1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
193 Outline of a Bison Grammar
195 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
201 Defining Language Semantics
203 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
227 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
228 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
229 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
230 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
231 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
232 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
234 Parser C-Language Interface
236 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
237 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
238 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
241 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
243 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
244 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
245 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
248 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
250 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
251 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
252 of the token it has read.
253 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
254 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
256 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
257 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
259 The Bison Parser Algorithm
261 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
262 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
263 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
264 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
265 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
266 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
267 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
268 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
269 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
270 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
274 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
275 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
276 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
277 * How Precedence:: How they work.
281 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
282 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
283 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
284 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
286 Handling Context Dependencies
288 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
289 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
290 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
291 error recovery rules must be written.
293 Debugging Your Parser
295 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
296 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
300 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
301 in alphabetical order by short options.
302 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
303 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
305 Parsers Written In Other Languages
307 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
308 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
312 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
313 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
314 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
315 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
316 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
317 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
319 A Complete C++ Example
321 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
322 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
323 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
324 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
325 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
329 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
330 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
331 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
332 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
333 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
334 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
335 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
336 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
338 Frequently Asked Questions
340 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
341 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
342 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
343 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
344 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
345 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
346 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
347 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
348 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
349 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
350 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
351 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
355 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
361 @unnumbered Introduction
364 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
365 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
366 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
367 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
368 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
369 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
370 calculators to complex programming languages.
372 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
373 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
374 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
375 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
376 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
379 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
380 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
381 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
382 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
385 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
386 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
387 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
388 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
389 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
390 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
393 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
396 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
398 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
399 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
400 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
401 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
402 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
404 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
406 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
407 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
408 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
409 License to all of the Bison source code.
411 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
412 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
413 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
414 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
415 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
416 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
417 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
419 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
420 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
421 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
422 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
423 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
424 using the other GNU tools.
426 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
427 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
428 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
429 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
433 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
434 @include gpl-3.0.texi
437 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
439 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
440 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
441 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
444 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
445 as mathematical ideas.
446 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
447 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
448 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
449 the name of an identifier, etc.).
450 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
451 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
452 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
453 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
454 how is the output used?
455 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
456 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
459 @node Language and Grammar
460 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
462 @cindex context-free grammar
463 @cindex grammar, context-free
464 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
465 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
466 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
467 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
468 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
469 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
470 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
471 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
475 @cindex Backus-Naur form
476 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
477 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
478 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
479 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
480 essentially machine-readable BNF.
482 @cindex LALR grammars
483 @cindex IELR grammars
485 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
486 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
487 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
488 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
489 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
490 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
491 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
492 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
493 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
494 Construction}, to learn how.
497 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
498 @cindex ambiguous grammars
499 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
501 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
502 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
503 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
504 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
505 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
506 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
507 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
508 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
509 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
510 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
511 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
512 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
513 possible parses of any given string is finite.
515 @cindex symbols (abstract)
517 @cindex syntactic grouping
518 @cindex grouping, syntactic
519 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
520 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
521 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
522 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
523 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
524 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
525 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
527 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
528 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
529 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
530 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
531 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
532 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
533 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
534 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
535 lexicography, not grammar.)
537 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
541 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
542 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
543 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
544 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
545 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
546 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
547 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
552 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
553 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
554 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
555 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
556 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
560 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
561 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
562 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
563 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
564 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
565 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
566 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
567 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
569 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
570 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
571 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
572 reads informally as follows:
575 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
580 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
584 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
585 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
586 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
587 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
590 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
591 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
592 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
593 not the start symbol.
595 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
596 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
597 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
598 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
599 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
600 reports a syntax error.
602 @node Grammar in Bison
603 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
604 @cindex Bison grammar
605 @cindex grammar, Bison
606 @cindex formal grammar
608 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
609 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
610 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
612 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
613 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
614 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
616 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
617 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
618 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
619 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
620 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
621 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
622 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
625 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
626 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
627 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
628 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
630 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
631 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
633 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
634 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
635 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
636 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
640 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
645 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
647 @node Semantic Values
648 @section Semantic Values
649 @cindex semantic value
650 @cindex value, semantic
652 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
653 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
654 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
655 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
656 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
659 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
660 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
661 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
662 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
663 ,Defining Language Semantics},
666 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
667 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
668 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
669 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
672 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
673 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
674 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
675 need to have any semantic value.)
677 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
678 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
679 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
680 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
681 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
682 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
684 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
685 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
686 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
687 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
688 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
690 @node Semantic Actions
691 @section Semantic Actions
692 @cindex semantic actions
693 @cindex actions, semantic
695 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
696 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
697 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
698 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
701 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
702 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
703 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
704 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
705 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
706 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
707 newly recognized larger expression.
709 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
713 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
718 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
719 from the values of the two subexpressions.
722 @section Writing GLR Parsers
724 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
727 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
728 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
730 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
731 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
732 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
733 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
734 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
735 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
736 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
737 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
738 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
740 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
741 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
742 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
743 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
744 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
745 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
746 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
747 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
748 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
749 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
750 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
751 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
752 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
753 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
754 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
755 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
756 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
757 identical set of symbols.
759 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
760 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
761 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
762 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
763 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
764 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
765 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
766 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
767 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
771 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
772 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
773 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
774 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
777 @node Simple GLR Parsers
778 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
779 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
780 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
784 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
785 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
787 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
788 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
789 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
791 Consider a problem that
792 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
793 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
796 type subrange = lo .. hi;
797 type enum = (a, b, c);
801 The original language standard allows only numeric
802 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
803 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
804 10206) and many other
805 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
806 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
810 type subrange = (a) .. b;
814 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
815 type with only one value:
822 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
823 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
825 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
826 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
827 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
828 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
829 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
830 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
831 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
832 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
834 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
835 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
836 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
837 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
840 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
841 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
842 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
843 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
844 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
845 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
848 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
849 use the GLR algorithm.
850 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
851 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
852 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
853 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
854 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
855 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
856 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
857 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
858 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
860 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
861 reports a syntax error as usual.
863 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
864 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
865 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
866 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
867 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
869 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
870 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
871 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
872 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
873 The present example contains only one conflict between two
874 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
875 cannot be nested. So the number of
876 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
877 and the parsing time is still linear.
879 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
880 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
883 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
893 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
898 type : '(' id_list ')'
920 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
921 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
922 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
923 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
930 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
931 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
932 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
941 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
942 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
943 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
944 notice when the parser splits.
946 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
947 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
948 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
949 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
950 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
951 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
952 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
953 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
954 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
955 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
956 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
957 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
958 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
961 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
962 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
963 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
964 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
965 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
966 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
968 @node Merging GLR Parses
969 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
970 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
971 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
975 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
977 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
982 #define YYSTYPE char const *
984 void yyerror (char const *);
997 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1000 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
1004 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1005 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1006 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1007 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1008 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1011 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
1012 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1013 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1014 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1017 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1018 | '(' declarator ')'
1023 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1024 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1031 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1032 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1033 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1034 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1035 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1036 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1037 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1038 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1039 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1040 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1041 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1042 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1043 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1044 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1046 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1047 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1048 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1049 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1050 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1051 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1052 The parser therefore prints
1055 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1058 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1059 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1066 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1067 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1068 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1069 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1070 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1071 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1072 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1073 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1074 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1075 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1081 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1082 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1083 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1084 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1088 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1089 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1094 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1098 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1106 with an accompanying forward declaration
1107 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1111 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1112 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1117 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1118 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1121 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1124 Bison requires that all of the
1125 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1126 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1127 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1128 the offending merge.
1130 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1131 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1133 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1134 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1135 the associated reduction.
1136 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1137 action in a GLR parser.
1140 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1142 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1144 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1145 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1146 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1147 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1148 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1149 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1150 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1151 influence syntax analysis.
1152 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1155 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1156 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1157 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1158 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1159 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1160 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1161 future versions of Bison.
1162 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1163 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1164 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1167 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1168 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1169 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1170 initiate error recovery.
1171 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1172 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1173 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1174 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1176 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1177 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1179 @node Compiler Requirements
1180 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1181 @cindex @code{inline}
1182 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1184 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1185 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1186 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1187 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1188 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1189 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1198 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1202 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1211 @cindex textual location
1212 @cindex location, textual
1214 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1215 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1216 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1217 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1219 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1220 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1221 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1222 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1225 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1226 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1227 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1230 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1231 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1232 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1233 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1234 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1235 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1236 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1239 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1240 @cindex Bison parser
1241 @cindex Bison utility
1242 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1245 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1246 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1247 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1248 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1249 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1250 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1251 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1254 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1255 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1256 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1259 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1260 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1261 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1262 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1263 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1264 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1265 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1267 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1268 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1269 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1270 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1271 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1272 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1273 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1274 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1275 C-Language Interface}.
1277 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1278 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1279 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1280 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1281 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1282 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1283 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1284 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1285 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1286 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1287 anything other than their usual meanings.
1289 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1290 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1291 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1292 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1293 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1294 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1295 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1296 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1297 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1300 @section Stages in Using Bison
1301 @cindex stages in using Bison
1304 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1305 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1309 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1310 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1311 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1312 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1313 sequence of C statements.
1316 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1317 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1318 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1319 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1322 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1325 Write error-reporting routines.
1328 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1329 must follow these steps:
1333 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1336 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1339 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1342 @node Grammar Layout
1343 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1344 @cindex grammar file
1346 @cindex format of grammar file
1347 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1349 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1350 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1357 @var{Bison declarations}
1366 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1367 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1369 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1370 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1371 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1372 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1373 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1374 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1376 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1377 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1378 semantic values of various symbols.
1380 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1383 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1384 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1385 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1389 @cindex simple examples
1390 @cindex examples, simple
1392 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1393 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1394 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1395 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1396 desk-top calculator.
1398 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1399 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1400 source file to try them.
1403 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1404 a first example with no operator precedence.
1405 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1406 Operator precedence is introduced.
1407 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1408 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1409 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1410 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1411 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1415 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1416 @cindex reverse polish notation
1417 @cindex polish notation calculator
1418 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1419 @cindex calculator, simple
1421 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1422 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1423 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1424 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1426 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1427 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1430 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1431 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1432 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1433 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1434 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1435 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1436 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1439 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1440 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1442 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1443 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1446 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1449 #define YYSTYPE double
1452 void yyerror (char const *);
1457 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1460 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1461 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1463 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1464 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1465 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1466 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1467 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1468 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1469 which is a floating point number.
1471 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1472 function @code{pow}.
1474 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1475 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1476 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1477 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1480 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1481 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1482 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1483 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1484 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1485 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1486 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1487 type for numeric constants.
1490 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1492 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1500 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1503 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1504 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1505 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1506 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1507 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1508 /* Exponentiation */
1509 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1511 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1516 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1517 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1518 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1519 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1520 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1523 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1524 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1525 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1527 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1528 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1529 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1530 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1531 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1532 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1541 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1543 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1551 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1552 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1553 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1554 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1555 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1557 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1558 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1559 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1560 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1561 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1562 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1564 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1565 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1566 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1567 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1570 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1571 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1572 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1575 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1577 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1581 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1585 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1586 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1587 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1588 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1589 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1590 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1591 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1593 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1594 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1595 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1596 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1597 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1600 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1602 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1603 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1604 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1605 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1609 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1610 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1615 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1616 equally well have written them separately:
1620 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1621 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1625 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1626 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1627 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1628 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1629 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1630 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1631 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1632 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1634 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1635 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1636 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1638 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1639 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1643 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1647 means the same thing as this:
1651 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1657 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1660 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1661 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1662 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1664 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1665 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1666 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1667 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1669 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1671 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1672 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1673 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1674 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1676 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1677 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1678 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1679 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1680 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1681 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1682 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1683 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1684 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1686 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1687 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1688 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1689 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1690 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1692 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1693 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1695 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1699 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1700 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1701 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1702 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1713 /* Skip white space. */
1714 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1718 /* Process numbers. */
1719 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1722 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1727 /* Return end-of-input. */
1730 /* Return a single char. */
1737 @subsection The Controlling Function
1738 @cindex controlling function
1739 @cindex main function in simple example
1741 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1742 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1743 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1756 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1757 @cindex error reporting routine
1759 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1760 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1761 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1762 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1763 here is the definition we will use:
1769 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1771 yyerror (char const *s)
1773 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1778 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1779 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1780 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1781 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1782 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1783 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1785 @node Rpcalc Generate
1786 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1787 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1789 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1790 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1791 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1792 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1793 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1794 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1796 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1797 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1799 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1800 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1807 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1808 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1809 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1810 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1811 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1812 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1813 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1815 @node Rpcalc Compile
1816 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1817 @cindex compiling the parser
1819 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1823 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1825 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1829 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1830 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1831 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1835 # @r{List files again.}
1837 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1841 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1842 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1848 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1850 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1854 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1856 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1861 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1862 @cindex infix notation calculator
1864 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1866 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1867 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1868 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1869 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1872 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1875 #define YYSTYPE double
1879 void yyerror (char const *);
1882 /* Bison declarations. */
1886 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1887 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1889 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1895 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1898 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1899 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1900 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1901 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1902 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1903 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1904 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1905 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1911 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1914 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1916 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1917 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1918 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1919 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1920 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1921 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1924 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1925 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1926 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1927 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1928 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1931 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1932 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1933 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1934 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1935 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1937 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1942 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1950 @node Simple Error Recovery
1951 @section Simple Error Recovery
1952 @cindex error recovery, simple
1954 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1955 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1956 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1957 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1958 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1959 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1961 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1962 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1963 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1968 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1969 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
1974 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
1975 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
1976 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
1977 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
1978 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
1979 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
1980 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
1981 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
1984 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
1985 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
1986 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
1987 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
1988 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
1989 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
1992 @node Location Tracking Calc
1993 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
1994 @cindex location tracking calculator
1995 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
1996 @cindex calculator, location tracking
1998 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
1999 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2000 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2001 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2005 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2006 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2007 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2010 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2011 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2013 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2014 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2017 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2023 void yyerror (char const *);
2026 /* Bison declarations. */
2034 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2038 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2039 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2040 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2041 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2042 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2043 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2044 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2048 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2050 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2051 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2052 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2053 from the new information.
2055 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2056 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2067 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2072 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2073 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2074 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2075 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2085 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2086 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2087 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2092 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2093 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2094 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2098 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2099 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2100 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2102 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2103 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2104 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2105 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2106 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2107 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2111 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2113 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2114 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2115 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2118 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2119 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2130 /* Skip white space. */
2131 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2132 ++yylloc.last_column;
2137 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2138 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2142 /* Process numbers. */
2146 ++yylloc.last_column;
2147 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2149 ++yylloc.last_column;
2150 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2157 /* Return end-of-input. */
2161 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2165 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2168 ++yylloc.last_column;
2173 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2174 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2175 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2176 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2178 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2179 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2180 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2181 controlling function:
2188 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2189 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2195 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2196 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2197 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2199 @node Multi-function Calc
2200 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2201 @cindex multi-function calculator
2202 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2203 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2205 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2206 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2207 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2208 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2209 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2211 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2212 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2213 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2214 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2215 functions whose syntax has this form:
2218 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2222 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2223 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2224 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2228 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2232 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2238 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2243 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2246 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2247 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2248 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2251 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2252 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2254 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2259 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2260 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2262 void yyerror (char const *);
2267 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2268 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2271 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2272 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2279 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2280 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2282 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2285 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2286 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2287 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2289 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2290 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2291 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2292 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2294 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2295 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2296 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2297 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2298 between angle brackets).
2300 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2301 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2302 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2303 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2304 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2305 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2308 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2310 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2311 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2312 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2324 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2325 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2330 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2331 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2332 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2333 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2334 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2335 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2336 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2337 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2338 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2339 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2340 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2343 /* End of grammar. */
2347 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2348 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2349 @cindex symbol table example
2351 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2352 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2353 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2354 requires some additional C functions for support.
2356 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2357 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2358 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2362 /* Function type. */
2363 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2367 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2370 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2371 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2374 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2375 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2377 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2382 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2384 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2385 extern symrec *sym_table;
2387 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2388 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2392 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2393 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2394 @code{init_table} as well:
2400 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2402 yyerror (char const *s)
2412 double (*fnct) (double);
2417 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2430 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2435 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2441 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2443 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2444 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2459 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2460 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2462 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2463 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2464 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2465 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2466 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2467 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2471 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2474 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2475 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2476 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2477 ptr->type = sym_type;
2478 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2479 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2485 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2488 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2489 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2490 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2496 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2497 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2498 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2499 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2501 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2502 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2503 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2504 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2505 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2506 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2508 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2509 operators in @code{yylex}.
2522 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2523 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t');
2530 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2531 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2534 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2540 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2544 static char *symbuf = 0;
2545 static int length = 0;
2550 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2551 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2553 length = 40, symbuf = (char *)malloc (length + 1);
2560 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2564 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2566 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2568 /* Get another character. */
2573 while (isalnum (c));
2580 s = getsym (symbuf);
2582 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2587 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2593 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2594 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2595 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2603 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2606 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2607 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2608 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2611 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2612 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2616 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2618 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2619 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2621 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2622 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2625 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2626 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2627 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2628 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2629 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2630 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2631 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2632 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2633 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2636 @node Grammar Outline
2637 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2639 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2640 appropriate delimiters:
2647 @var{Bison declarations}
2656 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2657 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2658 continues until end of line.
2661 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2662 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2663 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2664 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2665 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2669 @subsection The prologue
2670 @cindex declarations section
2672 @cindex declarations
2674 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2675 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2676 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2677 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2678 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2679 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2680 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2682 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2683 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2686 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2687 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2688 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2689 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2690 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2691 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2692 @code{%union} declaration.
2703 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2707 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2708 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2714 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2715 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2716 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2717 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2718 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2719 @code{#include} directives.
2721 @node Prologue Alternatives
2722 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2723 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2726 @findex %code requires
2727 @findex %code provides
2730 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2731 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2732 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2733 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2734 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2735 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2736 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2738 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2749 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2753 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2754 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2761 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2762 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2763 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2764 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2765 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2766 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2767 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2768 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2769 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2770 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2771 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2773 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2774 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2775 This behavior raises a few questions.
2776 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2777 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2778 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2779 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2780 This behavior is not intuitive.
2782 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2783 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2784 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2785 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2792 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2793 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2796 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2797 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2809 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2813 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2814 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2815 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2822 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2823 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2824 explicit which kind you intend.
2825 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2827 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2828 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2829 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2830 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2831 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2832 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2833 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2834 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2835 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2838 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2839 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2841 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2854 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2858 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2859 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2870 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2871 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2872 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2879 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2880 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2881 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2882 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2883 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2884 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2886 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2887 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2888 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2889 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2890 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2891 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2892 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2893 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2894 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2895 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2896 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2899 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2900 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2901 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2902 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2903 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2904 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2905 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
2906 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
2907 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
2908 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
2921 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2925 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2926 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2937 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2941 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2942 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2949 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
2950 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
2951 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
2954 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
2955 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
2956 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
2957 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
2958 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
2959 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
2962 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
2963 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
2964 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
2965 the grammar file affects its functionality.
2967 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
2968 organize your grammar file.
2969 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
2973 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
2974 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
2975 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
2976 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
2978 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
2979 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
2980 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
2981 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
2985 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
2986 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
2988 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
2990 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
2991 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
2992 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
2993 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
2995 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
2996 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
2997 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
2998 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
2999 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3000 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3001 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3002 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3005 @node Bison Declarations
3006 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3007 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3008 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3010 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3011 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3012 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3013 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3016 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3017 @cindex grammar rules section
3018 @cindex rules section for grammar
3020 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3021 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3023 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3024 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3025 if it is the first thing in the file.
3028 @subsection The epilogue
3029 @cindex additional C code section
3031 @cindex C code, section for additional
3033 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3034 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3035 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3036 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3037 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3038 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3039 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3040 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3041 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3042 C-Language Interface}.
3044 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3045 from the grammar rules.
3047 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3048 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3049 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3050 of the grammar file.
3053 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3054 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3055 @cindex terminal symbol
3059 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3062 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3063 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3064 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3065 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3066 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3067 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3068 the symbol to stand for it.
3070 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3071 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3072 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3074 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3075 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3076 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3077 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3078 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3079 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3080 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3082 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3086 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3087 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3088 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3089 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3092 @cindex character token
3093 @cindex literal token
3094 @cindex single-character literal
3095 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3096 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3097 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3098 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3099 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3100 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3101 ,Operator Precedence}).
3103 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3104 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3105 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3106 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3107 your program will confuse other readers.
3109 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3110 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3111 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3112 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3113 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3114 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3118 @cindex string token
3119 @cindex literal string token
3120 @cindex multicharacter literal
3121 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3122 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3123 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3124 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3125 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3127 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3128 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3129 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3130 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3131 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3133 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3135 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3136 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3137 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3138 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3139 read your program will be confused.
3141 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3142 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3143 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3144 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3145 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3146 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3149 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3150 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3151 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3153 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3154 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3155 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3156 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3157 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3158 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3159 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3160 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3161 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3162 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3163 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3164 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3166 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3167 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3168 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3169 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3170 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3172 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3173 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3174 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3175 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3176 characters in the following C-language string:
3179 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3182 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3183 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3184 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3185 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3186 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3187 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3188 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3189 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3190 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3191 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3194 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3195 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3196 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3197 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3198 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3201 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3203 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3204 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3206 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3210 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3216 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3217 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3218 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3230 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3231 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3233 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3234 extra white space as you wish.
3236 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3237 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3240 @{@var{C statements}@}
3245 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3246 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3247 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3248 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3249 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3250 compiler can check it.
3252 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3253 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3254 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3255 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3256 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3257 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3258 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3259 character constants.
3261 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3265 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3266 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3270 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3271 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3278 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3280 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3281 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3282 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3299 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3303 @section Recursive Rules
3304 @cindex recursive rule
3306 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3307 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3308 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3309 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3310 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3320 @cindex left recursion
3321 @cindex right recursion
3323 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3324 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3325 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3336 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3337 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3338 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3339 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3340 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3341 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3342 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3345 @cindex mutual recursion
3346 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3347 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3348 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3356 | primary '+' primary
3368 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3372 @section Defining Language Semantics
3373 @cindex defining language semantics
3374 @cindex language semantics, defining
3376 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3377 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3378 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3380 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3381 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3382 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3383 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3386 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3387 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3388 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3389 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3390 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3391 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3392 action in the middle of a rule.
3396 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3397 @cindex semantic value type
3398 @cindex value type, semantic
3399 @cindex data types of semantic values
3400 @cindex default data type
3402 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3403 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3404 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3405 Notation Calculator}).
3407 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3408 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3409 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3412 #define YYSTYPE double
3416 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3417 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3418 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3419 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3421 @node Multiple Types
3422 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3424 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3425 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3426 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3427 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3430 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3431 requires you to do two things:
3435 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3436 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3437 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3438 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3442 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3443 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3444 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3445 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3446 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3455 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3457 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3458 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3459 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3460 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3462 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3463 placed at any position in the rule;
3464 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3465 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3466 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3467 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3469 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3470 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3471 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3472 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3473 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3474 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3475 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3476 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3477 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3478 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3481 Here is a typical example:
3491 Or, in terms of named references:
3495 exp[result]: @dots{}
3496 | exp[left] '+' exp[right]
3497 @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3502 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3503 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3504 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3505 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3506 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3507 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3509 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3510 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3511 referred to as @code{$2}.
3513 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3514 references construct.
3516 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3517 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3518 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3519 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3520 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3524 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3528 @cindex default action
3529 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3530 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3531 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3532 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3533 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3534 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3536 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3537 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3538 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3539 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3540 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3544 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3545 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3551 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3556 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3557 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3558 definition of @code{foo}.
3561 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3562 any, from a semantic action.
3563 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3564 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3567 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3568 @cindex action data types
3569 @cindex data types in actions
3571 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3572 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3574 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3575 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3576 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3577 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3578 in the rule. In this example,
3589 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3590 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3591 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3592 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3594 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3595 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3596 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3608 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3609 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3611 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3612 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3613 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3614 @cindex mid-rule actions
3616 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3617 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3618 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3620 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3621 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3622 it is run before they are parsed.
3624 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3625 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3626 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3627 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3630 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3631 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3632 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3633 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3634 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3635 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3637 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3638 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3639 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3640 at the end of the rule.
3642 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3643 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3644 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3645 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3646 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3647 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3651 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3652 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3653 declare_variable ($3); @}
3655 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3660 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3661 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3662 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3663 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3664 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3665 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3666 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3667 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3669 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3670 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3671 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3672 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3673 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3676 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3677 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3678 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3679 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3680 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3682 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3683 Discarded Symbols}).
3684 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3685 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3687 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3688 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3693 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3699 pop_context ($1); @}
3702 let: LET '(' var ')'
3703 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3704 declare_variable ($3); @}
3711 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3712 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3713 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3715 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3716 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3717 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3718 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3719 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3724 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3725 | '@{' statements '@}'
3731 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3735 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3736 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3739 | '@{' statements '@}'
3745 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3746 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3747 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3748 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3749 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3750 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3752 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3753 actions into the two rules, like this:
3757 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3758 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3759 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3760 '@{' statements '@}'
3766 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3767 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3769 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3770 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3771 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3775 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3776 declarations statements '@}'
3777 | '@{' statements '@}'
3783 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3784 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3786 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3787 serves as a subroutine:
3791 subroutine: /* empty */
3792 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3798 compound: subroutine
3799 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3801 '@{' statements '@}'
3807 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3808 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3810 @node Tracking Locations
3811 @section Tracking Locations
3813 @cindex textual location
3814 @cindex location, textual
3816 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3817 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3818 especially symbol locations.
3820 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3821 actions to take when rules are matched.
3824 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3825 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3826 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3830 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3831 @cindex data type of locations
3832 @cindex default location type
3834 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3835 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3837 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3838 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3839 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3840 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3844 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3853 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3854 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3855 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3856 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3857 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3859 @node Actions and Locations
3860 @subsection Actions and Locations
3861 @cindex location actions
3862 @cindex actions, location
3865 @vindex @@@var{name}
3866 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3868 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3869 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3871 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3872 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3873 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3874 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3875 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3878 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
3879 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
3880 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3881 references construct.
3883 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3890 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3891 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3892 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3893 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3900 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3901 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3902 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3908 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3909 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3910 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
3913 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
3914 example above simply rewrites this way:
3927 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3928 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3929 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3936 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
3937 from a semantic action.
3938 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
3939 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3941 @node Location Default Action
3942 @subsection Default Action for Locations
3943 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
3944 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
3946 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
3947 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
3948 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
3949 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
3950 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
3951 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
3952 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
3953 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
3956 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
3957 dedicated code from semantic actions.
3959 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
3960 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
3961 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
3962 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
3963 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
3964 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
3965 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
3966 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
3967 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
3968 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
3970 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
3974 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
3978 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
3979 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
3980 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
3981 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
3985 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
3986 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
3987 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
3988 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
3994 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
3995 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
3996 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
3998 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4002 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4003 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4006 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4007 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4008 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4009 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4012 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4013 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4014 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4015 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4018 @node Named References
4019 @section Named References
4020 @cindex named references
4022 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4023 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4024 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4025 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4026 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4027 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4029 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4030 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4031 used as named references. For example:
4035 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4036 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4041 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4045 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4046 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4051 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4057 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4060 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4063 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4068 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4069 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4070 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4073 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4074 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4079 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4080 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4081 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4084 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4085 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4091 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4092 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4095 if-stmt: IF '(' expr ')' THEN then.stmt ';'
4096 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4100 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4101 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4102 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4103 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4104 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4105 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4106 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4108 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4112 @section Bison Declarations
4113 @cindex declarations, Bison
4114 @cindex Bison declarations
4116 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4117 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4120 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4121 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4122 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4123 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4125 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4126 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4127 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4128 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4131 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4132 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4133 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4134 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4135 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4136 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4137 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4138 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4139 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4140 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4141 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4142 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4143 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4144 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4148 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4149 @cindex version requirement
4150 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4153 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4154 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4158 %require "@var{version}"
4162 @subsection Token Type Names
4163 @cindex declaring token type names
4164 @cindex token type names, declaring
4165 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4168 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4174 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4175 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4176 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4178 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4179 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4180 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4183 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4184 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4185 following the token name:
4189 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4193 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4194 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4195 with each other or with normal characters.
4197 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4198 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4199 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4200 Than One Value Type}).
4206 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4210 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4214 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4215 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4216 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4223 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4224 equivalent literal string tokens:
4227 %token <operator> OR "||"
4228 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4233 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4234 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4235 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4236 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4237 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4238 the literal string instead of the token name.
4240 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4241 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4245 %token END 0 "end of file"
4248 @node Precedence Decl
4249 @subsection Operator Precedence
4250 @cindex precedence declarations
4251 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4252 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4254 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4255 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4256 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4257 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4258 operator precedence.
4260 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4261 @code{%token}: either
4264 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4271 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4274 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4275 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4276 all the @var{symbols}:
4280 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4281 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4282 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4283 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4284 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4285 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4286 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4287 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4288 considered a syntax error.
4291 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4292 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4293 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4294 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4295 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4298 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4299 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4300 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4301 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4306 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4307 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4311 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4312 @cindex declaring value types
4313 @cindex value types, declaring
4316 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4317 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4318 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4333 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4334 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4335 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4336 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4338 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4339 @code{union}. For example:
4351 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4352 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4355 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4356 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4357 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4359 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4360 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4362 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4363 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4364 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4365 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4373 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4378 and then your grammar can use the following
4379 instead of @code{%union}:
4392 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4393 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4394 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4398 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4399 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4400 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4403 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4407 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4408 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4409 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4410 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4411 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4414 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4415 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4416 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4417 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4419 @node Initial Action Decl
4420 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4421 @findex %initial-action
4423 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4424 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4427 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4428 @findex %initial-action
4429 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4430 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4431 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4432 @code{%parse-param}.
4435 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4438 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4441 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4446 @node Destructor Decl
4447 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4448 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4452 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4453 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4454 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4455 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4456 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4457 must discard the start symbol.
4459 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4460 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4461 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4462 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4464 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4465 symbol is automatically discarded.
4467 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4469 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4471 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4472 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4473 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4474 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4476 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4477 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4478 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4479 tag among @var{symbols}.
4480 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4481 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4482 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4484 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4485 (These default forms are experimental.
4486 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4488 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4489 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4490 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4491 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4493 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4494 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4495 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4496 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4497 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4504 %union @{ char *string; @}
4505 %token <string> STRING1
4506 %token <string> STRING2
4507 %type <string> string1
4508 %type <string> string2
4509 %union @{ char character; @}
4510 %token <character> CHR
4511 %type <character> chr
4514 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4515 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4516 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4517 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4521 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4522 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4523 to @code{free} by default.
4524 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4525 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4526 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4527 @code{free} only once.
4528 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4529 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4531 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4532 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4533 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4534 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4535 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4536 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4537 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4538 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4539 reference it in your grammar.
4540 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4541 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4547 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4548 @cindex mid-rule actions
4549 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4550 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4551 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4552 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4553 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4554 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4555 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4556 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4560 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4561 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4562 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4567 @cindex discarded symbols
4568 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4572 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4574 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4576 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4577 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4579 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4582 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4583 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4586 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4587 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4588 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4592 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4593 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4594 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4595 @cindex warnings, preventing
4596 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4600 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4601 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4602 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4603 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4604 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4605 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4607 The declaration looks like this:
4613 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4614 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4615 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4616 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4618 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4619 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4620 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4621 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4622 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4623 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4624 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4630 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4634 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4635 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4636 print the number of conflicts.
4639 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4640 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4641 go back to the beginning.
4644 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4645 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4646 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4649 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4650 but will keep silent otherwise.
4653 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4654 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4655 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4656 @cindex default start symbol
4659 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4660 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4661 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4668 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4669 @cindex reentrant parser
4671 @findex %define api.pure
4673 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4674 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4675 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4676 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4677 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4678 program must be called only within interlocks.
4680 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4681 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4682 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4683 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4684 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4686 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4687 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4688 reentrant. It looks like this:
4694 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4695 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4696 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4697 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4698 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4699 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4700 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4701 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4702 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4704 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4705 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4709 @subsection A Push Parser
4712 @findex %define api.push-pull
4714 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4715 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4717 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4718 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4719 each time a new token is made available.
4721 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4722 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4723 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4724 within a certain time period.
4726 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4727 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4728 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4731 %define api.push-pull push
4734 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4735 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4736 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4737 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4738 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4742 %define api.push-pull push
4745 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4746 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4747 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4748 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4750 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4751 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4752 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4753 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4754 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4755 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4756 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4757 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4761 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4763 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4764 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4765 yypstate_delete (ps);
4768 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4769 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4770 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4771 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4772 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4773 example would thus look like this:
4778 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4781 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4782 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4783 yypstate_delete (ps);
4786 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4787 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4789 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4790 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4791 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4792 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4793 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4794 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4795 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4796 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4797 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4798 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4799 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4800 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4801 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4802 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4803 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4804 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4805 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4809 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4810 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4811 yypstate_delete (ps);
4814 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4815 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
4816 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
4819 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4820 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4821 @cindex declaration summary
4822 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4824 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4826 @deffn {Directive} %union
4827 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4828 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4831 @deffn {Directive} %token
4832 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4833 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4836 @deffn {Directive} %right
4837 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4838 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4841 @deffn {Directive} %left
4842 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4843 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4846 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4847 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4848 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4849 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4853 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4854 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4855 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4859 @deffn {Directive} %type
4860 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4861 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4864 @deffn {Directive} %start
4865 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4869 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4870 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4871 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4877 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4880 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4881 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4883 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
4884 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
4885 @xref{%code Summary}.
4888 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4889 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
4890 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
4891 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4894 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
4895 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
4896 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
4897 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
4900 @deffn {Directive} %defines
4901 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
4902 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
4903 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
4904 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
4906 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
4907 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
4908 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
4909 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
4910 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
4911 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
4912 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
4913 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
4914 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
4915 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
4917 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
4918 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
4919 (Reentrant) Parser}.
4921 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
4922 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
4923 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
4925 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
4926 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
4927 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
4928 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
4929 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
4931 @findex %code requires
4932 @findex %code provides
4933 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
4934 header also contains their code.
4935 @xref{%code Summary}.
4938 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
4939 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
4942 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
4943 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
4944 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
4947 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
4948 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
4949 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
4952 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
4953 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
4954 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
4955 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
4957 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
4961 @deffn {Directive} %locations
4962 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
4963 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
4964 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
4965 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
4966 accurate syntax error messages.
4969 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
4970 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
4971 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
4973 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
4974 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
4975 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
4976 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
4977 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
4978 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
4979 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
4980 For C++ parsers, see the @code{%define namespace} documentation in this
4982 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
4986 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
4987 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
4988 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
4993 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
4994 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
4995 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
4996 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
4997 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
4998 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
4999 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5003 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5004 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5007 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5008 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5009 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5013 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5014 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5015 Require a Version of Bison}.
5018 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5019 Specify the skeleton to use.
5021 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5022 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5023 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5024 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5026 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5027 file in the Bison installation directory.
5028 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5029 directory of the grammar file.
5030 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5033 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5034 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5035 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5036 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5037 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5038 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5039 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5042 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5043 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5044 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5045 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5046 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5047 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5048 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5051 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5052 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5053 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5057 The highest token number, plus one.
5059 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5061 The number of grammar rules,
5063 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5067 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5068 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5069 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5070 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5074 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5075 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5076 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5080 @node %define Summary
5081 @subsection %define Summary
5083 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5084 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5085 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5086 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5087 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5088 @code{%define} directive:
5090 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5091 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5092 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5093 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5095 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5096 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5097 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5098 to specifying @code{""}.
5100 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5101 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5102 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5105 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5106 @code{%define} accepts.
5108 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5109 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5113 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5115 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5116 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5118 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5120 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5121 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5124 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5125 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5126 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5127 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5128 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5129 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5133 @findex %define api.pure
5136 @item Language(s): C
5138 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5139 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5141 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5143 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5147 @findex %define api.push-pull
5150 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5152 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5153 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5154 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5155 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5157 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5159 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5162 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5164 @item lr.default-reductions
5165 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5168 @item Language(s): all
5170 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5171 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5172 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5173 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5175 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5176 @item Default Value:
5178 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5179 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5183 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5185 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5186 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5189 @item Language(s): all
5190 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5191 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5192 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5193 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5196 @c ================================================== lr.type
5199 @findex %define lr.type
5202 @item Language(s): all
5204 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5205 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5206 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5208 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5210 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5214 @findex %define namespace
5217 @item Languages(s): C++
5219 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5220 For example, if you specify:
5223 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5226 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5229 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5232 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5233 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5236 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5242 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5243 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5244 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5246 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5248 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5249 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5250 lexical analyzer function.
5251 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5252 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5253 lexical analyzer function.
5254 For example, if you specify:
5257 %define namespace "foo"
5258 %name-prefix "bar::"
5261 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5265 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5267 @findex %define parse.lac
5270 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5272 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5273 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5274 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5275 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5281 @subsection %code Summary
5285 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5286 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5287 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5288 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5289 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5290 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5291 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5292 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5294 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5295 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5296 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5297 in the parser implementation.
5299 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5300 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5301 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5303 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5306 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5307 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5308 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5309 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5310 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5311 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5315 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5316 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5317 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5320 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5321 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5325 @findex %code requires
5328 @item Language(s): C, C++
5330 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5331 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5332 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5333 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5334 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5336 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5337 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5342 @findex %code provides
5345 @item Language(s): C, C++
5347 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5348 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5350 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5351 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5359 @item Language(s): C, C++
5361 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5362 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5363 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5364 parser implementation file. For example:
5373 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5377 @findex %code imports
5380 @item Language(s): Java
5382 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5384 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5385 before any class definitions.
5389 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5390 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5391 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5392 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5395 @node Multiple Parsers
5396 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5398 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5399 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5400 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5401 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5403 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5404 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5405 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5406 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5407 names that do not conflict.
5409 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5410 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5411 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5412 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5413 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5414 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5415 @code{clex}, and so on.
5417 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5418 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5419 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5420 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5421 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5423 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5424 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5425 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5426 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5429 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5430 @cindex C-language interface
5433 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5434 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5435 functions that it needs to use.
5437 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5438 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5439 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5440 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5443 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5444 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5445 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5446 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5447 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5448 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5450 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5451 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5452 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5456 @node Parser Function
5457 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5460 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5461 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5462 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5463 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5464 without reading further.
5467 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5468 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5469 is due to end-of-input).
5471 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5472 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5475 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5478 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5483 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5488 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5491 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5492 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5493 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5495 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5496 @findex %parse-param
5497 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5498 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5499 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5500 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5501 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5504 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5507 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5508 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5512 Then call the parser like this:
5516 int nastiness, randomness;
5517 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5518 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5524 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5527 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5530 @node Push Parser Function
5531 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5532 @findex yypush_parse
5534 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5535 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5537 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5538 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5539 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5540 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5542 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5543 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5544 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5545 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5548 @node Pull Parser Function
5549 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5550 @findex yypull_parse
5552 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5553 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5555 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5556 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5557 declaration is used.
5558 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5560 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5561 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5564 @node Parser Create Function
5565 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5566 @findex yypstate_new
5568 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5569 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5571 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5572 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5573 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5574 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5576 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5577 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5578 or 0 if no memory was available.
5579 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5583 @node Parser Delete Function
5584 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5585 @findex yypstate_delete
5587 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5588 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5590 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5591 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5592 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5593 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5595 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5596 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5597 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5601 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5603 @cindex lexical analyzer
5605 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5606 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5607 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5608 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5610 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5611 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5612 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5613 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5614 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5615 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5616 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5620 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5621 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5622 of the token it has read.
5623 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5624 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5626 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5627 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5630 @node Calling Convention
5631 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5633 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5634 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5635 signifies end-of-input.
5637 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5638 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5639 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5640 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5642 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5643 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5644 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5645 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5646 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5647 signifies end-of-input.
5649 Here is an example showing these things:
5656 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5659 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5660 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5662 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5668 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5669 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5671 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5672 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5676 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5677 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5678 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5679 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5682 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5683 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5684 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5685 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5686 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5689 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5690 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5691 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5692 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5695 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5698 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5699 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5700 strlen (token_buffer))
5701 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5702 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5707 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5708 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5712 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5715 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5716 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5717 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5718 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5724 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5725 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5730 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5731 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5732 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5733 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5734 declaration looks like this:
5747 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5752 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5753 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5758 @node Token Locations
5759 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5762 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
5763 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
5764 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
5765 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
5766 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
5767 data in that variable.
5769 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5770 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5771 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5772 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5773 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5776 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5779 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5781 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
5782 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5783 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5784 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5785 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5786 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
5791 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
5794 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5795 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5800 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
5801 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
5802 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
5806 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
5807 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
5810 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5812 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
5813 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
5819 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5820 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5821 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5825 results in the following signature:
5828 int yylex (int *nastiness);
5829 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5832 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
5835 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
5836 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5840 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
5843 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5844 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5847 @node Error Reporting
5848 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
5849 @cindex error reporting function
5852 @cindex syntax error
5854 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
5855 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
5856 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
5857 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
5860 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
5861 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
5862 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
5863 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
5864 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
5866 @findex %error-verbose
5867 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
5868 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
5869 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
5870 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
5871 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
5873 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
5874 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
5875 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
5876 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
5877 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
5878 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
5880 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
5881 translated automatically from English to some other language before
5882 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
5884 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
5889 yyerror (char const *s)
5893 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
5898 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
5899 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
5900 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
5901 immediately return 1.
5903 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
5904 an access to the current location.
5905 This is indeed the case for the GLR
5906 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
5907 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5911 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5912 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5915 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
5918 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5919 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5922 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
5923 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
5924 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
5925 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
5929 /* Location tracking. */
5933 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5935 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5936 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5940 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
5943 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5944 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5945 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
5946 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
5951 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
5952 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
5953 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
5954 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
5955 message is always passed last.
5957 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
5958 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
5959 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
5963 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
5964 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
5965 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
5966 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
5968 @node Action Features
5969 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
5970 @cindex summary, action features
5971 @cindex action features summary
5973 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
5974 are useful in actions.
5976 @deffn {Variable} $$
5977 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
5978 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
5981 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
5982 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
5983 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
5986 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
5987 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
5988 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
5989 Types of Values in Actions}.
5992 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
5993 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
5994 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
5995 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
5998 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
5999 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6000 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6003 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
6004 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6005 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6008 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
6010 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6011 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6012 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6013 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6014 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6015 going to be reduced by this rule.
6017 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6018 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6019 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6022 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6025 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6027 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6030 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6032 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6036 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
6038 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6039 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6040 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6041 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6042 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6045 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6046 @findex YYRECOVERING
6047 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6048 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6049 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6052 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6053 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6054 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6055 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6056 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6058 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6061 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
6062 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6064 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6066 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6069 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
6070 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6071 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6072 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6075 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6076 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6077 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6078 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6080 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6083 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6084 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6085 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6086 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6088 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6093 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6094 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6097 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6101 @c int first_line, last_line;
6102 @c int first_column, last_column;
6106 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6107 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6109 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6110 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6111 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6114 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6117 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6119 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6120 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6124 @node Internationalization
6125 @section Parser Internationalization
6126 @cindex internationalization
6132 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6133 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6134 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6135 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6136 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6137 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6138 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6139 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6142 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6143 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6144 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6149 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6150 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6151 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6152 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6153 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6157 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6162 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6163 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6164 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6165 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6166 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6167 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6168 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6169 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6170 Bison-generated parser.
6173 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6174 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6175 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6179 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6182 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6183 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6184 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6188 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6189 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6190 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6193 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6199 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6203 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6209 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6210 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6211 @cindex algorithm of parser
6214 @cindex parser stack
6215 @cindex stack, parser
6217 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6218 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6219 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6221 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6222 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6225 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6226 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6227 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6228 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6229 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6230 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6231 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6233 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6240 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6241 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6244 expr: expr '*' expr;
6248 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6255 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6256 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6258 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6259 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6260 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6262 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6265 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6266 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6267 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6268 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6269 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6270 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6271 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6272 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6273 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6274 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6278 @section Lookahead Tokens
6279 @cindex lookahead token
6281 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6282 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6283 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6284 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6285 token in order to decide what to do.
6287 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6288 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6289 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6290 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6291 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6292 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6293 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6296 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6297 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6298 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6315 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6316 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6317 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6318 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6319 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6321 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6322 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6323 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6324 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6325 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6326 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6331 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6332 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6333 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6334 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6337 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6339 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6340 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6341 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6343 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6344 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6350 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6356 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6357 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6359 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6360 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6361 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6362 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6365 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6366 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6367 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6368 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6369 contrast it with the other alternative.
6371 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6372 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6376 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6378 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6381 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6382 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6383 making these two inputs equivalent:
6386 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6388 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6391 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6392 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6393 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6394 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6395 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6396 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6397 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6398 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6400 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6401 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6402 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6403 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6405 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6407 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6408 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6409 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6414 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6426 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6435 @section Operator Precedence
6436 @cindex operator precedence
6437 @cindex precedence of operators
6439 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6440 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6441 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6442 shift and when to reduce.
6445 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6446 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6447 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6448 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6451 @node Why Precedence
6452 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6454 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6455 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6469 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6470 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6471 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6472 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6473 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6474 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6475 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6478 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6479 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6480 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6481 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6482 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6483 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6484 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6485 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6488 @cindex associativity
6489 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6490 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6491 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6492 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6493 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6494 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6495 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6496 makes right-associativity.
6498 @node Using Precedence
6499 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6504 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6505 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6506 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6507 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6508 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6509 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6510 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6513 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6514 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6515 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6516 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6517 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6519 @node Precedence Examples
6520 @subsection Precedence Examples
6522 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6530 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6531 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6532 declared with @code{'-'}:
6535 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6541 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6542 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6543 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6545 @node How Precedence
6546 @subsection How Precedence Works
6548 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6549 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6550 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6551 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6552 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6553 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6555 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6556 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6557 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6558 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6559 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6560 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6561 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6564 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6565 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6567 @node Contextual Precedence
6568 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6569 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6570 @cindex unary operator precedence
6571 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6572 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6575 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6576 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6577 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6578 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6580 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6581 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6582 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6583 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6586 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6587 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6588 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6589 modifier's syntax is:
6592 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6596 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6597 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6598 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6599 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6600 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6602 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6603 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6604 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6614 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6621 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6626 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6627 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6628 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6629 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6631 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6632 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6633 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6634 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6636 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6637 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6638 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6639 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6640 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6641 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6643 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6644 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6648 @section Parser States
6649 @cindex finite-state machine
6650 @cindex parser state
6651 @cindex state (of parser)
6653 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6654 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6655 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6656 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6657 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6659 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6660 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6661 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6662 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6663 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6664 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6665 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6666 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6669 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6670 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6671 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6674 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6675 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6676 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6678 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6679 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6682 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6683 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6686 sequence: /* empty */
6687 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6690 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6693 maybeword: /* empty */
6694 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6696 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6701 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6702 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6703 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6704 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6705 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6706 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6708 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6709 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6710 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6712 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6713 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6714 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6715 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6716 In this example, the output of the program changes.
6718 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6719 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6720 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6721 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6724 sequence: /* empty */
6725 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6727 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6731 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6734 sequence: /* empty */
6736 | sequence redirects
6743 redirects:/* empty */
6744 | redirects redirect
6749 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6750 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6751 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6752 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6753 in infinitely many ways!
6755 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6756 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6757 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6758 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6760 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6764 sequence: /* empty */
6770 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6774 sequence: /* empty */
6776 | sequence redirects
6784 | redirects redirect
6788 @node Mysterious Conflicts
6789 @section Mysterious Conflicts
6790 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
6792 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
6800 def: param_spec return_spec ','
6804 | name_list ':' type
6822 | name ',' name_list
6827 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
6828 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
6829 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
6830 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
6834 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
6836 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
6837 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
6838 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
6840 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
6841 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
6842 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
6843 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
6844 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
6845 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
6846 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
6849 @cindex canonical LR
6850 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
6851 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
6852 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
6853 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
6854 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
6855 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
6856 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
6857 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
6859 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
6860 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
6861 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
6862 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
6863 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
6874 /* This rule is never used. */
6880 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
6881 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
6882 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
6883 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
6884 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
6885 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
6887 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
6888 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
6889 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
6890 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
6891 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
6892 rather than the one for @code{name}.
6897 | name_list ':' type
6905 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
6906 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
6911 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
6912 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
6913 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
6914 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
6915 Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
6916 the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
6917 sometimes contain incorrect information.
6919 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
6920 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
6921 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
6922 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
6924 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
6925 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
6928 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
6929 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
6930 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
6931 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
6934 @node LR Table Construction
6935 @subsection LR Table Construction
6936 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
6939 @cindex canonical LR
6940 @findex %define lr.type
6942 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
6943 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
6944 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
6945 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
6948 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
6949 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
6950 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
6951 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
6954 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
6955 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
6956 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
6959 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
6960 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
6961 values for @var{TYPE} are:
6964 @item @code{lalr} (default)
6966 @item @code{canonical-lr}
6969 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
6973 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
6977 %define lr.type ielr
6980 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
6981 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
6982 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
6983 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
6984 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
6985 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
6986 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
6987 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
6988 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
6989 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
6991 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
6992 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
6993 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
6994 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7000 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7003 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7005 @cindex GLR with LALR
7006 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7007 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7008 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7009 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7010 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7011 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7012 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7013 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7014 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7015 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7017 @item Malformed grammars.
7019 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7020 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7021 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7022 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7023 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7028 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7029 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7030 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7031 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7032 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7033 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7034 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7035 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7036 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7040 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7043 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7044 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7045 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7046 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7047 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7048 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7049 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7050 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7051 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7052 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7053 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7054 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7057 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7058 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7059 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7061 @node Default Reductions
7062 @subsection Default Reductions
7063 @cindex default reductions
7064 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7067 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7068 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7069 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7070 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7071 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7073 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7074 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7077 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7079 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7080 @cindex consistent states
7081 @cindex defaulted states
7082 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7083 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7084 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7085 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7086 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7087 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7088 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7089 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7090 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7091 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7092 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7094 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7095 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7096 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7097 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7098 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7099 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7100 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7101 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7102 should already be considered closed.
7104 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7106 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7107 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7108 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7109 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7110 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7111 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7112 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7113 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7114 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7118 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7119 @c sentence from being rejected.
7120 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7121 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7122 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7123 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7124 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7125 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7128 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7129 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7130 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7131 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7132 because the accept action ends the parse.
7134 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7135 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7136 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7137 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7138 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7139 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7140 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7141 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7142 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7143 split the parse instead.
7145 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7146 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7148 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7149 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7150 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7152 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7153 @item @code{consistent}
7154 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7157 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7158 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7163 @findex %define parse.lac
7165 @cindex lookahead correction
7167 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7168 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7169 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7170 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7171 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7172 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7173 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7174 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7175 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7177 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7178 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7179 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7180 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7181 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7183 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7184 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7185 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7186 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7188 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7189 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7191 @item @code{none} (default)
7194 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7195 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7199 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7200 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7201 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7202 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7203 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7204 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7205 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7206 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7207 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7208 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7211 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7212 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7213 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7214 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7215 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7216 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7217 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7218 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7219 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7220 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7222 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7223 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7224 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7225 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7226 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7227 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7228 language-recognition power.
7230 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7233 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7235 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7236 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7237 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7238 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7241 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7243 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7244 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7245 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7246 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7247 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7248 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7252 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7253 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7254 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7255 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7256 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7257 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7258 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7259 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7260 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7261 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7262 has proven insignificant for practical grammars.
7265 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7266 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7267 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7269 @node Unreachable States
7270 @subsection Unreachable States
7271 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7272 @cindex unreachable states
7274 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7275 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7276 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7277 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7279 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7280 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7281 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7282 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7284 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7285 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7286 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7289 There are a few caveats to consider:
7292 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7294 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7295 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7296 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7297 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7298 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7299 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7301 @item Other useless states.
7303 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7304 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7305 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7306 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7307 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7308 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7309 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7312 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7313 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7315 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7316 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7317 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7319 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7320 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7321 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7322 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7323 context-free languages.
7324 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7325 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7326 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7327 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7328 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7329 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7330 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7331 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7333 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7334 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7335 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7336 parser uses the same basic
7337 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7338 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7339 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7340 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7342 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7343 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7344 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7345 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7346 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7348 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7349 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7350 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7351 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7352 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7353 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7354 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7355 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7356 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7357 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7358 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7361 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7362 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7363 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7364 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7365 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7366 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7367 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7368 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7369 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7370 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7371 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7372 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7374 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7375 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7376 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7378 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7379 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7380 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7381 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7382 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7383 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7384 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7385 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7386 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7387 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7388 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7389 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7391 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7394 @node Memory Management
7395 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7396 @cindex memory exhaustion
7397 @cindex memory management
7398 @cindex stack overflow
7399 @cindex parser stack overflow
7400 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7402 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7403 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7404 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7406 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7407 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7408 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7411 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7412 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7413 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7414 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7416 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7417 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7418 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7419 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7420 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7421 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7423 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7424 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7425 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7428 @cindex default stack limit
7429 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7433 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7434 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7435 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7436 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7437 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7439 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7441 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7442 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7443 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7444 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7445 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7446 this deficiency in a future release.
7448 @node Error Recovery
7449 @chapter Error Recovery
7450 @cindex error recovery
7451 @cindex recovery from errors
7453 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7454 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7455 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7458 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7459 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7460 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7461 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7462 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7463 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7464 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7467 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7468 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7469 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7470 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7471 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7472 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7477 stmnts: /* empty string */
7483 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7484 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
7486 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7487 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7488 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7489 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7490 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
7491 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7492 applicable in the ordinary way.
7494 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7495 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7496 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7497 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7498 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
7499 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7500 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7501 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7502 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7503 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7504 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7505 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7507 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7508 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7509 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7512 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7515 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7516 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7517 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7518 spurious error message:
7521 primary: '(' expr ')'
7527 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7528 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7529 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7530 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7531 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7532 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7533 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7536 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7537 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7538 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7539 error messages resume.
7541 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7542 as any other rules can.
7545 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7546 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7547 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7548 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7551 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7552 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7553 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7555 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7557 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7558 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7559 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7560 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7561 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7563 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7564 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7565 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7566 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7569 @node Context Dependency
7570 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7572 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7573 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7574 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7575 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7579 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7580 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7581 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7582 error recovery rules must be written.
7585 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7586 neither clean nor robust.)
7588 @node Semantic Tokens
7589 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7591 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7592 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7598 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7599 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7600 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7602 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7603 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7604 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7605 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7606 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7608 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7609 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7610 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7611 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7612 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7613 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7614 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7616 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7617 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7618 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7619 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7623 typedef int foo, bar;
7626 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7627 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7632 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7633 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7635 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7636 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7637 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7638 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7639 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7643 declarator maybeasm '='
7645 | declarator maybeasm
7649 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
7651 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7656 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7657 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7658 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7660 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7661 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7662 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7663 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7664 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7665 the syntactic context.
7667 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7668 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7669 @cindex lexical tie-in
7671 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7672 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7675 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7676 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7677 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7678 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7679 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7686 void yyerror (char const *);
7700 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7714 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7715 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7716 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7718 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
7719 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
7720 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
7723 @node Tie-in Recovery
7724 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7726 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7727 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7729 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7730 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7731 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7732 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7736 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7743 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7744 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7745 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7746 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7747 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7749 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7751 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7752 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7753 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7765 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7766 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7767 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7768 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7770 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7771 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7772 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7773 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7774 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7775 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7778 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7781 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7783 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
7784 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
7785 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
7786 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
7787 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
7788 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
7791 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7792 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7796 @section Understanding Your Parser
7798 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
7799 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
7800 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
7801 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
7802 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
7804 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
7805 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
7806 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
7807 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
7808 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
7809 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
7810 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
7812 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
7829 @command{bison} reports:
7832 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
7833 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
7834 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
7835 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
7836 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
7839 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
7840 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
7841 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
7842 interpretation is the same.
7844 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
7845 to precedence and/or associativity:
7848 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
7849 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
7850 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
7855 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
7858 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7859 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7860 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7861 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
7865 @cindex token, useless
7866 @cindex useless token
7867 @cindex nonterminal, useless
7868 @cindex useless nonterminal
7869 @cindex rule, useless
7870 @cindex useless rule
7871 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
7872 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
7873 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
7874 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
7878 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
7881 Terminals unused in grammar:
7884 Rules useless in grammar:
7889 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
7895 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
7896 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
7897 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
7898 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
7899 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
7904 and reports the uses of the symbols:
7907 Terminals, with rules where they appear
7917 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
7922 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
7927 @cindex pointed rule
7928 @cindex rule, pointed
7929 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
7930 with it set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
7931 item is a production rule together with a point (marked by @samp{.})
7932 that the input cursor.
7937 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7939 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7944 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
7945 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
7946 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
7947 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
7948 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
7949 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted on
7950 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
7951 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
7953 @cindex core, item set
7954 @cindex item set core
7955 @cindex kernel, item set
7956 @cindex item set core
7957 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
7958 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
7959 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
7960 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
7961 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
7962 @option{--report=itemset} to list all the items, include those that can
7968 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7969 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
7970 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
7971 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
7972 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
7973 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
7975 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7986 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
7988 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
7992 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
7993 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
7994 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
7995 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8000 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
8001 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8002 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8003 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8004 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8006 $ shift, and go to state 3
8007 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8008 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8009 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8010 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8014 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8015 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead if
8016 @samp{+}, it will be shifted on the parse stack, and the automaton
8017 control will jump to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp
8018 '+' . exp}. Since there is no default action, any other token than
8019 those listed above will trigger a syntax error.
8021 @cindex accepting state
8022 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8028 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
8034 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
8035 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
8037 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8043 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
8045 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8051 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
8053 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8059 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
8061 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8067 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
8069 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8074 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8080 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8081 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
8082 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8083 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8084 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8086 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8087 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8089 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8090 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8093 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8094 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8095 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8096 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8097 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8098 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8099 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8100 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8102 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8103 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8104 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
8107 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8108 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8109 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8110 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8111 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8112 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8113 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8114 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8115 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8116 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8117 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8118 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8123 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8124 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
8125 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8126 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8127 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8129 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8130 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8132 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8133 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8136 The remaining states are similar:
8141 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8142 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8143 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
8144 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8145 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8147 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8148 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8150 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8151 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8155 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8156 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8157 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8158 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
8159 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8161 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8163 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8164 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8168 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8169 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8170 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8171 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8172 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
8174 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8175 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8176 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8177 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8179 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8180 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8181 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8182 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8183 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8187 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8188 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8189 @samp{*}, but also because the
8190 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8194 @section Tracing Your Parser
8197 @cindex tracing the parser
8199 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
8200 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
8202 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8205 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8207 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8208 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8209 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8210 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8213 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8214 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8215 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8217 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8219 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
8220 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
8221 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
8222 preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to
8224 the preferred solution.
8227 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8230 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8231 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8232 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8233 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8234 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8235 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8237 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8238 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8239 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8240 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8242 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8243 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8244 messages tell you these things:
8248 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8251 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8252 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8255 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8256 of the state stack afterward.
8259 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8260 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8261 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8262 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8263 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8264 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8265 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8266 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8267 grammar are to blame.
8269 The parser implementation file is a C program and you can use C
8270 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8271 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8272 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8273 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8276 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8277 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8278 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8279 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8280 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8281 value (from @code{yylval}).
8283 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8284 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8288 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8289 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
8292 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8295 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8298 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8299 else if (type == NUM)
8300 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8304 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8307 @chapter Invoking Bison
8308 @cindex invoking Bison
8309 @cindex Bison invocation
8310 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8312 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8318 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8319 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8320 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8321 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8322 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8323 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8324 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8325 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8326 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8327 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8328 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8333 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8336 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8339 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8342 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8344 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8345 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8346 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8349 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8350 in alphabetical order by short options.
8351 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8352 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8356 @section Bison Options
8358 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8359 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8360 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8361 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8362 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8365 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8366 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8369 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8375 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8379 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8381 @item --print-localedir
8382 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8384 @item --print-datadir
8385 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8389 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8390 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8391 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8392 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8393 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8394 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8395 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8396 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8397 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8398 for compatibility with POSIX:
8405 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8406 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8407 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8408 this option is specified.
8410 @item -W [@var{category}]
8411 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8412 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8415 @item midrule-values
8416 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8418 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8421 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8424 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8425 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8428 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8431 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8432 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8433 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8436 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8440 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
8441 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
8442 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
8443 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
8444 no effect on the conflict report.
8447 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
8449 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
8450 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
8456 Turn off all the warnings.
8458 Treat warnings as errors.
8461 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8462 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8463 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8472 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
8473 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8474 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8476 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8477 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8478 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8479 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8480 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8481 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
8482 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8486 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8489 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8490 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8491 definition for @var{name}.
8493 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8494 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8495 definitions for @var{name}.
8497 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8498 definitions for @var{name}.
8501 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8502 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8503 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8505 @item -L @var{language}
8506 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8507 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8508 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8509 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8510 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8512 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8516 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8518 @item -p @var{prefix}
8519 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8520 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8521 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8525 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8526 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8527 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8528 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8529 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8530 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8533 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8534 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8535 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8537 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8538 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8539 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8540 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8542 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8543 file in the Bison installation directory.
8544 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8545 current working directory.
8546 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8549 @itemx --token-table
8550 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8557 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8558 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8559 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8560 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8563 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8564 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8565 with other short options.
8567 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8568 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8569 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8570 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8572 @item -r @var{things}
8573 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8574 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8575 separated list of @var{things} among:
8579 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8583 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8584 each rule's lookahead set.
8587 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8588 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8591 @item --report-file=@var{file}
8592 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
8596 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8597 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
8598 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8601 @itemx --output=@var{file}
8602 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
8604 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
8605 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
8607 @item -g [@var{file}]
8608 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
8609 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
8610 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
8611 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
8612 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8613 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8616 @item -x [@var{file}]
8617 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
8618 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
8619 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8620 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8622 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
8623 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8626 @node Option Cross Key
8627 @section Option Cross Key
8629 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
8630 the corresponding short option and directive.
8632 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
8633 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
8634 @include cross-options.texi
8638 @section Yacc Library
8640 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
8641 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
8642 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
8643 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
8644 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
8645 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
8646 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
8648 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
8649 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
8652 int yyerror (char const *);
8655 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
8656 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
8657 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
8663 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
8665 @node Other Languages
8666 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
8669 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
8670 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
8674 @section C++ Parsers
8677 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
8678 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
8679 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
8680 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8681 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
8682 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
8685 @node C++ Bison Interface
8686 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
8687 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
8691 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
8692 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8693 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
8694 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8696 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
8698 @findex %define namespace
8699 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
8700 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
8701 generated in the following files:
8706 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
8707 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
8710 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
8713 @itemx @var{file}.cc
8714 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
8715 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
8716 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
8717 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
8719 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
8720 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
8721 @samp{%defines} directive.
8724 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
8725 for a complete and accurate documentation.
8727 @node C++ Semantic Values
8728 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
8729 @c - No objects in unions
8731 @c - Printer and destructor
8733 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
8734 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
8735 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
8736 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
8737 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
8740 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
8741 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
8742 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
8744 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
8745 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
8746 to such objects are allowed.
8749 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
8750 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
8751 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
8755 @node C++ Location Values
8756 @subsection C++ Location Values
8760 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
8762 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
8763 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. Two auxiliary classes
8764 define a @code{position}, a single point in a file, and a @code{location}, a
8765 range composed of a pair of @code{position}s (possibly spanning several
8768 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
8769 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
8770 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
8771 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
8772 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
8775 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
8776 The line, starting at 1.
8779 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8780 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
8783 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
8784 The column, starting at 0.
8787 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8788 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
8791 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8792 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8793 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8794 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8795 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
8798 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
8799 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
8800 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
8801 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
8804 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
8805 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
8806 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8809 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8810 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8811 Advance the @code{end} position.
8814 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
8815 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
8816 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
8817 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
8820 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
8821 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
8825 @node C++ Parser Interface
8826 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
8827 @c - define parser_class_name
8829 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8831 @c - Reporting errors
8833 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
8834 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
8835 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
8836 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
8837 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
8838 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
8839 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
8840 additional argument for its constructor.
8842 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
8843 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
8844 The types for semantics value and locations.
8847 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
8848 A structure that contains (only) the definition of the tokens as the
8849 @code{yytokentype} enumeration. To refer to the token @code{FOO}, the
8850 scanner should use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
8851 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
8852 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
8855 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8856 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
8857 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
8860 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
8861 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
8864 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
8865 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
8866 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
8870 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
8871 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
8872 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
8873 or nonzero, full tracing.
8876 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
8877 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
8878 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
8879 described by @var{m}.
8883 @node C++ Scanner Interface
8884 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
8885 @c - prefix for yylex.
8886 @c - Pure interface to yylex
8889 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
8890 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
8891 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
8893 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8894 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8895 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
8896 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
8900 @node A Complete C++ Example
8901 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
8903 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
8904 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
8905 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
8906 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
8907 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
8908 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
8909 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
8910 actually easier to interface with.
8913 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
8914 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
8915 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
8916 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
8917 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
8920 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8921 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8923 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
8924 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
8925 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
8926 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
8927 of valid input follows.
8931 seven := one + two * three
8935 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
8936 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
8938 @c - A place to store error messages
8939 @c - A place for the result
8941 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
8942 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
8943 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
8944 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
8945 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
8946 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
8947 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
8949 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
8950 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
8951 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
8954 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8956 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8957 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8960 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
8965 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
8966 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
8967 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
8968 factor both as follows.
8970 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8972 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
8974 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
8975 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
8976 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
8977 calcxx_driver& driver)
8978 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
8983 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
8986 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8988 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
8993 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
8995 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9001 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
9002 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
9004 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9006 // Handling the scanner.
9009 bool trace_scanning;
9013 Similarly for the parser itself.
9015 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9017 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
9018 int parse (const std::string& f);
9024 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9025 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9026 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9027 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9029 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9032 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9033 void error (const std::string& m);
9035 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9038 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9039 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9040 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9041 messages and set error state.
9043 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9045 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9046 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9048 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9049 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9051 variables["one"] = 1;
9052 variables["two"] = 2;
9055 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9060 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9064 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9065 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9066 int res = parser.parse ();
9072 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9074 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9078 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9080 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9085 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9087 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9088 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9089 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
9090 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
9093 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9095 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9096 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9098 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9102 @findex %code requires
9103 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
9104 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
9105 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
9106 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9107 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
9108 use a forward declaration of the driver.
9109 @xref{%code Summary}.
9111 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9115 class calcxx_driver;
9120 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9121 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9124 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9126 // The parsing context.
9127 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9128 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9132 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
9133 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9134 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9135 automatically propagated.
9137 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9142 // Initialize the initial location.
9143 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9148 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
9149 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
9152 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9159 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
9162 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9174 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9175 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9177 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9180 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9186 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9187 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
9188 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
9189 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
9192 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9194 %token END 0 "end of file"
9196 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9197 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
9202 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
9205 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9206 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9208 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
9209 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
9211 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <ival>
9215 The grammar itself is straightforward.
9217 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9221 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9223 assignments: assignments assignment @{@}
9224 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
9227 "identifier" ":=" exp
9228 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
9232 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9233 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9234 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9235 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9236 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
9237 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
9242 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9245 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9248 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
9249 const std::string& m)
9251 driver.error (l, m);
9255 @node Calc++ Scanner
9256 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9258 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9259 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9261 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9263 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9268 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9269 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9271 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9272 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9273 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9274 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
9278 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
9279 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
9280 not of token_type. */
9281 #define yyterminate() return token::END
9286 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9287 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9288 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9289 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
9291 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9293 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9297 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9299 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9301 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9307 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9308 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9309 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
9310 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
9311 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9312 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9313 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9315 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9318 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
9324 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
9325 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
9329 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
9330 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
9331 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
9332 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
9334 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9337 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
9339 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
9340 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
9341 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
9344 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9345 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9346 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
9348 return token::NUMBER;
9350 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
9351 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
9356 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
9357 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9359 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9362 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9364 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9367 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9369 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
9370 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
9375 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9381 @node Calc++ Top Level
9382 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9384 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9386 @comment file: calc++.cc
9389 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9392 main (int argc, char *argv[])
9394 calcxx_driver driver;
9395 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
9396 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
9397 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9398 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
9399 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9400 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
9401 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9406 @section Java Parsers
9409 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
9410 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
9411 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
9412 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9413 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
9414 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
9415 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9416 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
9419 @node Java Bison Interface
9420 @subsection Java Bison Interface
9421 @c - %language "Java"
9423 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
9424 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9426 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
9427 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
9429 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9430 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
9431 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
9432 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
9433 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
9434 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
9435 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
9436 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
9437 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
9438 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
9440 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
9442 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
9443 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
9444 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
9445 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
9448 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
9449 api.push-pull} have no effect.
9451 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
9452 @code{glr-parser} directive.
9454 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
9455 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
9457 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
9458 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
9459 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
9460 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
9461 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
9462 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
9463 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
9464 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
9465 access the token names and codes.
9467 @node Java Semantic Values
9468 @subsection Java Semantic Values
9469 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
9471 @c - Printer and destructor
9473 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
9474 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
9475 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
9478 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
9479 %type <Integer> number
9482 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
9483 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
9484 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
9485 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
9486 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
9489 %define stype "ASTNode"
9493 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
9494 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
9496 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9497 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
9498 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
9499 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
9500 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
9501 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
9503 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
9504 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
9505 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
9507 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
9508 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
9509 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
9512 @node Java Location Values
9513 @subsection Java Location Values
9518 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
9519 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
9520 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
9521 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9522 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
9523 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
9524 renamed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
9526 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
9527 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
9528 with @code{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
9529 be supplied by the user.
9532 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
9533 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
9534 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9537 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
9538 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9541 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
9542 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9545 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
9546 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
9547 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
9548 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
9552 @node Java Parser Interface
9553 @subsection Java Parser Interface
9554 @c - define parser_class_name
9556 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9558 @c - Reporting errors
9560 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
9561 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
9562 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
9563 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
9564 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
9566 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
9567 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
9568 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
9569 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
9570 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
9571 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
9573 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
9574 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
9575 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
9576 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
9578 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
9579 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
9580 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
9581 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
9582 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
9583 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
9585 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
9586 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
9588 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
9589 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
9590 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
9591 which initialize them automatically.
9593 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
9594 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
9596 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9597 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
9598 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
9602 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9603 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
9604 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
9606 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
9607 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
9608 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
9611 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
9612 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
9613 @code{false} otherwise.
9616 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
9617 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
9618 from a syntax error.
9619 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9622 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
9623 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
9624 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9628 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
9629 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
9630 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9631 or nonzero, full tracing.
9635 @node Java Scanner Interface
9636 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
9639 @c - Lexer interface
9641 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
9642 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
9643 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
9644 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
9646 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
9647 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
9648 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
9649 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
9652 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
9653 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
9654 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
9655 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
9658 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
9660 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
9661 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
9662 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
9663 changed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
9666 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
9667 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9668 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
9671 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
9672 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9675 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
9676 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
9677 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
9678 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
9679 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
9681 The return type can be changed using @code{%define position_type
9682 "@var{class-name}".}
9685 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
9686 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
9688 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
9689 "@var{class-name}".}
9693 @node Java Action Features
9694 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
9696 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
9697 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
9699 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
9700 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
9703 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9704 This may not be assigned to.
9705 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9708 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
9709 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
9710 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9714 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
9715 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
9716 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
9717 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
9718 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
9719 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9722 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
9723 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
9724 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
9725 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
9727 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9731 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9732 This may not be assigned to.
9733 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9737 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
9738 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9741 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
9742 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
9743 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9746 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
9747 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
9748 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9751 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
9752 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
9753 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9756 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
9757 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
9758 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
9760 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9763 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
9764 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
9765 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
9766 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
9771 @node Java Differences
9772 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9774 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
9775 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
9776 section summarizes these differences.
9780 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
9781 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
9782 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
9783 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
9784 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
9785 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
9786 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9788 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
9789 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
9790 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
9791 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
9792 corresponds to these C macros.}.
9795 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
9796 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
9797 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
9798 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
9799 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
9800 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
9801 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
9802 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
9803 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9806 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
9808 @item @code{%code imports}
9809 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
9810 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
9811 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
9813 @item unqualified @code{%code}
9814 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
9816 @item @code{%code lexer}
9817 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
9818 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
9819 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
9823 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
9824 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
9825 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
9827 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
9828 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
9833 @node Java Declarations Summary
9834 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
9836 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
9837 meaning when used in a Java parser.
9839 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
9840 Generate a Java class for the parser.
9843 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9844 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
9845 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
9846 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
9847 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9850 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9851 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
9852 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
9853 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9856 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9857 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
9858 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
9859 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9862 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
9863 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
9864 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9867 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
9868 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
9870 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9873 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9874 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
9875 @xref{Java Differences}.
9878 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9879 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
9880 @xref{Java Differences}.
9883 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9884 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
9885 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9888 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
9889 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
9890 @emph{outside} the parser class.
9891 @xref{Java Differences}.
9894 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
9895 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
9896 @xref{Java Differences}.
9899 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
9900 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
9901 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9904 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
9905 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
9906 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9909 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
9910 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
9911 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9914 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
9915 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
9917 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9920 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
9921 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
9922 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9923 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9926 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
9927 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
9928 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
9929 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
9930 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9933 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
9934 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
9935 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9938 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
9939 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
9940 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
9941 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9944 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
9945 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
9946 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
9947 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9950 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
9951 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
9952 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9955 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
9956 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
9957 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9960 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
9961 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
9962 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9965 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
9966 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
9967 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
9968 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9972 @c ================================================= FAQ
9975 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
9976 @cindex frequently asked questions
9979 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
9983 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
9984 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
9985 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
9986 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
9987 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
9988 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
9989 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
9990 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
9991 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
9992 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
9993 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
9994 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
9997 @node Memory Exhausted
9998 @section Memory Exhausted
10001 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10002 message. What can I do?
10005 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
10008 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10009 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10011 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10012 following typical questions:
10015 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10016 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10017 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10024 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10025 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10026 although I did specify @code{%define api.pure}.
10029 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10030 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10031 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10032 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10033 @file{first-line.l}:
10038 #include <stdlib.h>
10041 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10044 yyparse (char const *file)
10046 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10050 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10052 /* One token only. */
10054 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10057 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10072 If the file @file{input} contains
10080 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10083 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10084 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10085 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10090 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10091 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10092 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10093 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10094 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10095 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10096 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10097 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10100 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10101 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10102 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10103 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10105 @node Strings are Destroyed
10106 @section Strings are Destroyed
10109 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10110 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10111 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10114 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10115 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10116 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10121 char *yylval = NULL;
10124 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10130 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10131 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10132 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10133 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10138 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10141 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10142 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10143 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10149 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10150 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10151 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10152 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10153 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10154 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10157 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10158 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10159 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10164 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10165 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10168 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10169 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10172 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10173 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10174 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10175 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10176 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10177 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10178 execute simple instructions one after the others.
10180 @cindex abstract syntax tree
10182 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10183 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10184 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10185 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10186 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10187 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10190 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10191 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10194 @node Multiple start-symbols
10195 @section Multiple start-symbols
10198 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
10199 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
10200 multiple entry points.
10203 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
10204 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
10205 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
10206 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10210 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
10212 start: START_FOO foo
10216 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10217 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10219 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10220 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10221 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10222 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10223 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10224 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10225 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10226 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10229 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10234 int t = start_token;
10239 /* @r{The rules.} */
10243 @node Secure? Conform?
10244 @section Secure? Conform?
10247 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10250 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10251 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10252 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10253 please send us a bug report.
10255 @node I can't build Bison
10256 @section I can't build Bison
10259 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10260 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10264 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10265 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10266 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10267 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10268 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10269 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10270 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10273 @node Where can I find help?
10274 @section Where can I find help?
10277 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10280 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10281 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10282 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10283 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10284 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10285 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10286 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10287 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10291 @section Bug Reports
10294 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10297 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10298 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10299 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10300 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10301 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10303 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10304 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10305 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10306 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10307 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10309 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10310 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10311 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10312 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10313 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10314 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10316 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10317 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
10319 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10321 @node More Languages
10322 @section More Languages
10325 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10326 favorite language here}?
10329 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10330 languages; contributions are welcome.
10333 @section Beta Testing
10336 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10339 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10340 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10341 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10342 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10343 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10344 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10345 essentially halted.
10347 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10348 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10349 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10350 systems are especially welcome.
10352 @node Mailing Lists
10353 @section Mailing Lists
10356 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10359 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10361 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10363 @node Table of Symbols
10364 @appendix Bison Symbols
10365 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
10366 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10368 @deffn {Variable} @@$
10369 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10370 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10373 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10374 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
10375 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10378 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
10379 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10383 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
10384 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10388 @deffn {Variable} $$
10389 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
10393 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
10394 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
10395 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
10398 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
10399 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10403 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
10404 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10408 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
10409 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
10410 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
10411 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
10414 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
10415 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
10416 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
10417 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
10418 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
10422 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
10423 Comment delimiters, as in C.
10426 @deffn {Delimiter} :
10427 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
10431 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
10432 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10435 @deffn {Delimiter} |
10436 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
10437 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10440 @deffn {Directive} <*>
10441 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
10444 This feature is experimental.
10445 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10448 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10451 @deffn {Directive} <>
10452 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
10455 This feature is experimental.
10456 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10459 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10462 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
10463 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
10464 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
10465 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
10468 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
10469 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
10470 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
10471 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
10472 @xref{%code Summary}.
10475 @deffn {Directive} %debug
10476 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10480 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
10481 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10482 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10487 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
10488 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
10489 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
10490 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
10493 @deffn {Directive} %defines
10494 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
10495 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10498 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
10499 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
10500 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10503 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
10504 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
10505 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10508 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
10509 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
10510 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
10514 @deffn {Symbol} $end
10515 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
10516 used in the grammar.
10519 @deffn {Symbol} error
10520 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
10521 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
10522 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
10523 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
10524 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
10525 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
10526 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
10527 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10530 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
10531 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
10532 when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
10535 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10536 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
10540 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
10541 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
10542 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10545 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
10546 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
10549 @deffn {Directive} %language
10550 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
10551 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10554 @deffn {Directive} %left
10555 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
10556 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10559 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10560 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10561 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
10565 @deffn {Directive} %merge
10566 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
10567 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
10568 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
10569 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10572 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10573 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10577 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
10578 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10579 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10584 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
10585 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
10586 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10589 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
10590 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
10591 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10594 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
10595 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
10596 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10599 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10600 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10601 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
10602 Function @code{yyparse}}.
10605 @deffn {Directive} %prec
10606 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
10607 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
10610 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
10611 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
10612 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
10613 unreasonable usage.
10616 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
10617 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
10618 Require a Version of Bison}.
10621 @deffn {Directive} %right
10622 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
10623 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10626 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
10627 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
10628 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10631 @deffn {Directive} %start
10632 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
10636 @deffn {Directive} %token
10637 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
10638 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
10641 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
10642 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
10643 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10646 @deffn {Directive} %type
10647 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
10648 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
10651 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
10652 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
10653 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
10657 @deffn {Directive} %union
10658 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
10659 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
10662 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
10663 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
10664 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
10665 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
10666 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10668 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
10672 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
10673 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
10674 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
10675 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10677 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
10681 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
10682 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
10683 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10686 @deffn {Variable} yychar
10687 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
10688 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
10689 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
10690 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10693 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
10694 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
10695 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10698 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
10699 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
10700 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10703 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
10704 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
10705 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
10706 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10709 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
10710 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
10711 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10714 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
10715 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
10716 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
10717 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
10718 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10720 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
10724 @deffn {Function} yyerror
10725 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
10726 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
10727 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10730 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
10731 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
10732 to request verbose, specific error message strings
10733 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
10734 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
10735 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
10738 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
10739 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
10740 @xref{Memory Management}.
10743 @deffn {Function} yylex
10744 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
10745 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
10749 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
10750 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
10751 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
10752 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
10753 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10756 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
10757 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
10758 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10759 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10761 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
10763 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
10764 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
10765 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
10768 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
10769 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
10770 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
10773 @deffn {Variable} yylval
10774 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
10775 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10776 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10778 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
10779 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
10780 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
10783 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
10784 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
10788 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
10789 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
10790 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
10791 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
10792 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10795 @deffn {Function} yyparse
10796 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
10797 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10800 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
10801 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10802 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
10803 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
10804 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
10805 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10806 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10809 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
10810 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10811 call this function to create a new parser.
10812 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
10813 @code{yypstate_new}}.
10814 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10815 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10818 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
10819 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10820 parse the rest of the input stream.
10821 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
10822 @code{yypull_parse}}.
10823 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10824 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10827 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
10828 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10829 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
10830 @code{yypush_parse}}.
10831 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10832 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10835 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
10836 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
10837 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
10838 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
10839 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10842 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
10843 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
10844 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
10845 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10848 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
10849 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
10850 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
10851 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
10852 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
10853 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
10854 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
10856 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
10857 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
10858 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
10859 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
10860 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
10861 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
10862 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
10865 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
10866 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
10867 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
10875 @item Accepting state
10876 A state whose only action is the accept action.
10877 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
10878 @xref{Understanding,,}.
10880 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
10881 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
10882 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
10883 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
10884 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10886 @item Consistent state
10887 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
10889 @item Context-free grammars
10890 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
10891 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
10892 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
10893 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
10896 @item Default reduction
10897 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
10898 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
10899 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
10900 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
10903 @item Defaulted state
10904 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
10906 @item Dynamic allocation
10907 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
10908 compile time or on entry to a function.
10911 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
10912 character string of length zero.
10914 @item Finite-state stack machine
10915 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
10916 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
10917 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
10918 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
10919 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
10920 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10922 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
10923 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
10924 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
10925 deterministic parsing
10926 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
10927 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
10928 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
10932 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
10933 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
10934 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10936 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
10937 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
10938 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
10939 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
10940 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
10941 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
10942 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
10943 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
10944 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
10945 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
10947 @item Infix operator
10948 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
10949 performs some operation.
10952 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
10954 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
10955 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
10956 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
10957 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
10958 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
10959 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
10960 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
10962 @item Language construct
10963 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
10964 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
10965 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10967 @item Left associativity
10968 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
10969 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
10970 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
10972 @item Left recursion
10973 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
10974 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10977 @item Left-to-right parsing
10978 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
10979 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10981 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
10982 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
10983 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
10985 @item Lexical tie-in
10986 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
10987 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
10989 @item Literal string token
10990 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
10992 @item Lookahead token
10993 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
10997 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
10998 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
10999 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11002 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11003 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11005 @item Nonterminal symbol
11006 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11007 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11008 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11011 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11012 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11015 @item Postfix operator
11016 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11017 performs some operation.
11020 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11021 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11025 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11026 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11027 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11029 @item Reverse polish notation
11030 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11032 @item Right recursion
11033 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11034 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11038 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11039 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11040 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11043 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11044 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11045 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11047 @item Single-character literal
11048 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11049 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11052 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11053 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11054 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11055 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11058 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11059 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11060 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11063 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11064 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11067 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11068 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11069 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11070 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11072 @item Terminal symbol
11073 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11074 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11075 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11077 @item Unreachable state
11078 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
11079 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
11080 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
11083 @node Copying This Manual
11084 @appendix Copying This Manual
11088 @unnumbered Bibliography
11092 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
11093 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
11094 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
11095 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
11097 @item [Denny 2010 May]
11098 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
11099 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
11100 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
11101 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
11103 @item [Denny 2010 November]
11104 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
11105 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
11106 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
11107 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
11109 @item [DeRemer 1982]
11110 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
11111 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
11112 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
11113 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
11116 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
11117 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
11118 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
11121 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
11122 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
11123 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
11124 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
11134 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11135 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11136 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11137 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11138 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11139 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11140 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11141 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11142 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11143 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11144 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11145 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11146 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11147 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum
11148 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11149 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11150 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11151 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11152 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11153 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11154 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11155 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11156 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11157 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead
11158 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11159 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11160 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11161 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11162 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11163 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11164 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs
11165 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC
11166 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11167 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative
11168 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11169 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11170 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11171 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz
11172 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
11173 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno
11174 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
11175 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
11176 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
11177 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
11178 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc
11179 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
11180 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
11181 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
11182 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
11183 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
11184 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett
11185 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity
11187 @c Local Variables:
11188 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"