1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2011 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
115 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
117 The Concepts of Bison
119 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
120 as mathematical ideas.
121 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
122 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
123 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
124 the name of an identifier, etc.).
125 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
126 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
127 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
128 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
129 how is the output used?
130 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
131 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
135 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
136 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
137 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
138 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
142 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
143 a first example with no operator precedence.
144 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
145 Operator precedence is introduced.
146 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
147 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
148 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
149 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
150 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
152 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
154 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
155 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
156 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
157 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
158 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
159 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
160 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
162 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
168 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
170 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
171 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
172 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
174 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
176 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
177 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
182 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
183 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
184 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
185 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
186 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
187 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
188 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
189 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
191 Outline of a Bison Grammar
193 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
194 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
195 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
196 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
197 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
199 Defining Language Semantics
201 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
202 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
203 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
204 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
205 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
206 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
207 action in the middle of a rule.
208 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
212 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
213 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
214 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
218 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
219 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
220 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
221 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
222 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
223 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
224 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
225 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
226 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
227 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
228 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
229 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
230 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
231 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
233 Parser C-Language Interface
235 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
236 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
237 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
238 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
239 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
240 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
242 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
243 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
244 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
247 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
249 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
250 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
251 of the token it has read.
252 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
253 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
255 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
256 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
258 The Bison Parser Algorithm
260 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
261 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
262 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
263 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
264 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
265 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
266 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
267 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
268 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
272 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
273 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
274 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
275 * How Precedence:: How they work.
277 Handling Context Dependencies
279 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
280 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
281 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
282 error recovery rules must be written.
284 Debugging Your Parser
286 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
287 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
291 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
292 in alphabetical order by short options.
293 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
294 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
296 Parsers Written In Other Languages
298 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
299 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
303 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
304 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
305 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
306 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
307 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
308 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
310 A Complete C++ Example
312 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
313 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
314 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
315 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
316 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
320 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
321 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
322 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
323 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
324 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
325 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
326 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
327 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
329 Frequently Asked Questions
331 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
332 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
333 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
334 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
335 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
336 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
337 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
338 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
339 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
340 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
341 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
342 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
346 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
352 @unnumbered Introduction
355 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
356 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
357 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
358 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
359 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
360 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
361 calculators to complex programming languages.
363 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
364 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
365 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
366 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
367 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
370 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
371 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
372 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
373 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
376 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
377 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
378 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
379 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
380 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
381 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
384 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
387 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
389 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
390 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
391 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
392 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
393 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
395 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
397 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
398 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
399 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
400 License to all of the Bison source code.
402 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
403 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
404 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
405 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
406 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
407 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
408 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
410 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
411 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
412 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
413 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
414 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
415 using the other GNU tools.
417 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
418 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
419 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
420 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
424 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
425 @include gpl-3.0.texi
428 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
430 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
431 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
432 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
435 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
436 as mathematical ideas.
437 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
438 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
439 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
440 the name of an identifier, etc.).
441 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
442 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
443 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
444 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
445 how is the output used?
446 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
447 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
450 @node Language and Grammar
451 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
453 @cindex context-free grammar
454 @cindex grammar, context-free
455 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
456 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
457 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
458 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
459 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
460 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
461 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
462 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
466 @cindex Backus-Naur form
467 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
468 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
469 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
470 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
471 essentially machine-readable BNF.
473 @cindex LALR(1) grammars
474 @cindex IELR(1) grammars
475 @cindex LR(1) grammars
476 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars.
477 Although it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is
478 optimized for what are called LR(1) grammars.
479 In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible to tell how to parse
480 any portion of an input string with just a single token of lookahead.
481 For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the additional
482 restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
483 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}, for
484 more information on this.
485 As an experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
486 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables.
487 @xref{%define Summary,,lr.type}, to learn how.
490 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
491 @cindex ambiguous grammars
492 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
494 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
495 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
496 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
497 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
498 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
499 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
500 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
501 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
502 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
503 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
504 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
505 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
506 possible parses of any given string is finite.
508 @cindex symbols (abstract)
510 @cindex syntactic grouping
511 @cindex grouping, syntactic
512 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
513 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
514 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
515 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
516 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
517 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
518 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
520 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
521 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
522 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
523 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
524 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
525 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
526 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
527 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
528 lexicography, not grammar.)
530 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
534 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
535 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
536 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
537 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
538 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
539 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
540 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
545 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
546 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
547 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
548 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
549 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
553 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
554 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
555 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
556 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
557 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
558 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
559 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
560 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
562 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
563 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
564 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
565 reads informally as follows:
568 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
573 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
577 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
578 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
579 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
580 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
583 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
584 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
585 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
586 not the start symbol.
588 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
589 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
590 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
591 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
592 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
593 reports a syntax error.
595 @node Grammar in Bison
596 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
597 @cindex Bison grammar
598 @cindex grammar, Bison
599 @cindex formal grammar
601 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
602 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
603 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
605 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
606 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
607 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
609 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
610 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
611 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
612 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
613 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
614 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
615 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
618 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
619 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
620 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
621 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
623 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
624 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
626 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
627 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
628 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
629 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
633 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
638 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
640 @node Semantic Values
641 @section Semantic Values
642 @cindex semantic value
643 @cindex value, semantic
645 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
646 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
647 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
648 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
649 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
652 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
653 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
654 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
655 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
656 ,Defining Language Semantics},
659 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
660 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
661 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
662 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
665 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
666 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
667 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
668 need to have any semantic value.)
670 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
671 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
672 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
673 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
674 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
675 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
677 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
678 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
679 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
680 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
681 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
683 @node Semantic Actions
684 @section Semantic Actions
685 @cindex semantic actions
686 @cindex actions, semantic
688 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
689 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
690 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
691 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
694 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
695 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
696 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
697 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
698 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
699 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
700 newly recognized larger expression.
702 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
706 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
711 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
712 from the values of the two subexpressions.
715 @section Writing GLR Parsers
717 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
720 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
721 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
723 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
724 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
725 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
726 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
727 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
728 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
729 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
730 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
731 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
733 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
734 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
735 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
736 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
737 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
738 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
739 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
740 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
741 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
742 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
743 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
744 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
745 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
746 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
747 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
748 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
749 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
750 identical set of symbols.
752 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
753 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
754 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
755 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
756 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
757 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
758 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
759 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
760 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
764 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
765 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
766 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
767 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
770 @node Simple GLR Parsers
771 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
772 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
773 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
777 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
778 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
780 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
781 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
782 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
784 Consider a problem that
785 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
786 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
789 type subrange = lo .. hi;
790 type enum = (a, b, c);
794 The original language standard allows only numeric
795 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
796 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
797 10206) and many other
798 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
799 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
803 type subrange = (a) .. b;
807 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
808 type with only one value:
815 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
816 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
818 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
819 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
820 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
821 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
822 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
823 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
824 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
825 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
827 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
828 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
829 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
830 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
833 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
834 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
835 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
836 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
837 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
838 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
841 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
842 use the GLR algorithm.
843 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
844 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
845 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
846 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
847 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
848 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
849 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
850 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
851 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
853 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
854 reports a syntax error as usual.
856 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
857 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
858 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
859 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
860 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
862 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
863 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
864 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
865 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
866 The present example contains only one conflict between two
867 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
868 cannot be nested. So the number of
869 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
870 and the parsing time is still linear.
872 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
873 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
876 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
886 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
891 type : '(' id_list ')'
913 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
914 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
915 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
916 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
923 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
924 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
925 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
934 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
935 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
936 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
937 notice when the parser splits.
939 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
940 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
941 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
942 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
943 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
944 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
945 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
946 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
947 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
948 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
949 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
950 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
951 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
954 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
955 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
956 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
957 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
958 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
959 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
961 @node Merging GLR Parses
962 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
963 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
964 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
968 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
970 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
975 #define YYSTYPE char const *
977 void yyerror (char const *);
990 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
993 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
997 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
998 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
999 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1000 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1001 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1004 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
1005 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1006 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1007 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1010 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1011 | '(' declarator ')'
1016 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1017 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1024 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1025 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1026 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1027 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1028 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1029 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1030 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1031 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1032 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1033 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1034 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1035 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1036 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1037 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1039 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1040 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1041 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1042 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1043 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1044 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1045 The parser therefore prints
1048 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1051 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1052 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1059 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1060 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1061 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1062 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1063 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1064 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1065 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1066 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1067 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1068 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1074 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1075 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1076 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1077 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1081 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1082 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1087 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1091 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1099 with an accompanying forward declaration
1100 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1104 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1105 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1110 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1111 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1114 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1117 Bison requires that all of the
1118 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1119 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1120 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1121 the offending merge.
1123 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1124 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1126 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1127 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1128 the associated reduction.
1129 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1130 action in a GLR parser.
1133 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1135 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1137 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1138 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1139 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1140 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1141 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1142 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1143 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1144 influence syntax analysis.
1145 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1148 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1149 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1150 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1151 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1152 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1153 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1154 future versions of Bison.
1155 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1156 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1157 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1160 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1161 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1162 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1163 initiate error recovery.
1164 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1165 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1166 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1167 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1169 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1170 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1172 @node Compiler Requirements
1173 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1174 @cindex @code{inline}
1175 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1177 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1178 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1179 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1180 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1181 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1182 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1191 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1195 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1201 @node Locations Overview
1204 @cindex textual location
1205 @cindex location, textual
1207 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1208 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1209 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1210 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1212 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1213 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens and
1214 groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1215 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Locations}, for more details).
1217 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1218 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1219 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1222 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1223 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1224 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1225 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1226 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1227 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1228 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1231 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1232 @cindex Bison parser
1233 @cindex Bison utility
1234 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1237 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1238 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1239 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1240 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1241 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1242 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1243 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1246 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1247 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1248 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1251 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1252 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1253 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1254 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1255 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1256 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1257 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1259 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1260 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1261 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1262 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1263 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1264 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1265 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1266 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1267 C-Language Interface}.
1269 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1270 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1271 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1272 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1273 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1274 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1275 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1276 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1277 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1278 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1279 anything other than their usual meanings.
1281 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1282 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1283 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1284 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1285 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1286 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1287 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1288 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1289 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1292 @section Stages in Using Bison
1293 @cindex stages in using Bison
1296 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1297 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1301 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1302 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1303 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1304 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1305 sequence of C statements.
1308 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1309 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1310 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1311 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1314 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1317 Write error-reporting routines.
1320 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1321 must follow these steps:
1325 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1328 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1331 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1334 @node Grammar Layout
1335 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1336 @cindex grammar file
1338 @cindex format of grammar file
1339 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1341 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1342 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1349 @var{Bison declarations}
1358 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1359 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1361 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1362 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1363 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1364 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1365 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1366 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1368 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1369 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1370 semantic values of various symbols.
1372 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1375 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1376 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1377 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1381 @cindex simple examples
1382 @cindex examples, simple
1384 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1385 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1386 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1387 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1388 desk-top calculator.
1390 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1391 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1392 source file to try them.
1395 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1396 a first example with no operator precedence.
1397 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1398 Operator precedence is introduced.
1399 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1400 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1401 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1402 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1403 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1407 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1408 @cindex reverse polish notation
1409 @cindex polish notation calculator
1410 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1411 @cindex calculator, simple
1413 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1414 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1415 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1416 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1418 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1419 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1422 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1423 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1424 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1425 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1426 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1427 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1428 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1431 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1432 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1434 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1435 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1438 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1441 #define YYSTYPE double
1444 void yyerror (char const *);
1449 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1452 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1453 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1455 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1456 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1457 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1458 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1459 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1460 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1461 which is a floating point number.
1463 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1464 function @code{pow}.
1466 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1467 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1468 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1469 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1472 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1473 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1474 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1475 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1476 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1477 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1478 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1479 type for numeric constants.
1482 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1484 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1492 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1495 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1496 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1497 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1498 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1499 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1500 /* Exponentiation */
1501 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1503 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1508 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1509 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1510 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1511 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1512 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1515 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1516 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1517 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1519 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1520 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1521 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1522 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1523 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1524 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1533 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1535 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1543 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1544 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1545 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1546 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1547 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1549 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1550 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1551 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1552 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1553 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1554 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1556 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1557 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1558 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1559 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1562 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1563 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1564 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1567 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1569 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1573 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1577 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1578 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1579 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1580 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1581 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1582 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1583 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1585 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1586 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1587 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1588 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1589 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1592 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1594 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1595 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1596 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1597 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1601 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1602 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1607 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1608 equally well have written them separately:
1612 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1613 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1617 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1618 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1619 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1620 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1621 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1622 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1623 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1624 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1626 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1627 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1628 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1630 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1631 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1635 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1639 means the same thing as this:
1643 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1649 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1652 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1653 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1654 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1656 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1657 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1658 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1659 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1661 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1663 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1664 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1665 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1666 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1668 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1669 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1670 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1671 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1672 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1673 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1674 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1675 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1676 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1678 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1679 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1680 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1681 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1682 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1684 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1685 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1687 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1691 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1692 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1693 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1694 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1705 /* Skip white space. */
1706 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1710 /* Process numbers. */
1711 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1714 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1719 /* Return end-of-input. */
1722 /* Return a single char. */
1729 @subsection The Controlling Function
1730 @cindex controlling function
1731 @cindex main function in simple example
1733 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1734 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1735 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1748 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1749 @cindex error reporting routine
1751 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1752 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1753 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1754 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1755 here is the definition we will use:
1761 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1763 yyerror (char const *s)
1765 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1770 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1771 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1772 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1773 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1774 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1775 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1777 @node Rpcalc Generate
1778 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1779 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1781 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1782 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1783 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1784 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1785 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1786 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1788 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1789 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1791 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1792 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1799 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1800 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1801 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1802 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1803 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1804 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1805 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1807 @node Rpcalc Compile
1808 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1809 @cindex compiling the parser
1811 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1815 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1817 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1821 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1822 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1823 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1827 # @r{List files again.}
1829 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1833 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1834 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1840 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1842 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1846 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1848 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1853 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1854 @cindex infix notation calculator
1856 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1858 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1859 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1860 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1861 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1864 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1867 #define YYSTYPE double
1871 void yyerror (char const *);
1874 /* Bison declarations. */
1878 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1879 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1881 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1887 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1890 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1891 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1892 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1893 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1894 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1895 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1896 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1897 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1903 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1906 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1908 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1909 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1910 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1911 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1912 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1913 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1916 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1917 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1918 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1919 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1920 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1923 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1924 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1925 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1926 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1927 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1929 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1934 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1942 @node Simple Error Recovery
1943 @section Simple Error Recovery
1944 @cindex error recovery, simple
1946 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1947 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1948 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1949 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1950 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1951 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1953 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1954 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1955 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1960 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1961 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
1966 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
1967 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
1968 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
1969 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
1970 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
1971 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
1972 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
1973 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
1976 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
1977 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
1978 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
1979 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
1980 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
1981 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
1984 @node Location Tracking Calc
1985 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
1986 @cindex location tracking calculator
1987 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
1988 @cindex calculator, location tracking
1990 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
1991 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
1992 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
1993 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
1997 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
1998 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
1999 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2002 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2003 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2005 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2006 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2009 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2015 void yyerror (char const *);
2018 /* Bison declarations. */
2026 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2030 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2031 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2032 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2033 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2034 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2035 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2036 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2040 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2042 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2043 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2044 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2045 from the new information.
2047 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2048 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2059 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2064 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2065 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2066 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2067 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2077 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2078 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2079 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2084 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2085 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2086 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2090 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2091 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2092 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2094 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2095 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2096 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2097 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2098 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2099 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2103 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2105 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2106 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2107 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2110 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2111 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2122 /* Skip white space. */
2123 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2124 ++yylloc.last_column;
2129 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2130 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2134 /* Process numbers. */
2138 ++yylloc.last_column;
2139 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2141 ++yylloc.last_column;
2142 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2149 /* Return end-of-input. */
2153 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2157 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2160 ++yylloc.last_column;
2165 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2166 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2167 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2168 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2170 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2171 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2172 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2173 controlling function:
2180 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2181 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2187 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2188 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2189 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2191 @node Multi-function Calc
2192 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2193 @cindex multi-function calculator
2194 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2195 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2197 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2198 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2199 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2200 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2201 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2203 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2204 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2205 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2206 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2207 functions whose syntax has this form:
2210 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2214 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2215 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2216 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2220 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2224 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2230 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2235 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2238 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2239 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2240 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2243 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2244 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2246 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2251 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2252 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2254 void yyerror (char const *);
2259 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2260 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2263 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2264 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2271 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2272 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2274 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2277 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2278 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2279 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2281 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2282 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2283 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2284 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2286 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2287 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2288 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2289 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2290 between angle brackets).
2292 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2293 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2294 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2295 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2296 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2297 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2300 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2302 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2303 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2304 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2316 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2317 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2322 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2323 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2324 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2325 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2326 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2327 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2328 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2329 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2330 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2331 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2332 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2335 /* End of grammar. */
2339 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2340 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2341 @cindex symbol table example
2343 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2344 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2345 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2346 requires some additional C functions for support.
2348 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2349 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2350 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2354 /* Function type. */
2355 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2359 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2362 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2363 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2366 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2367 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2369 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2374 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2376 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2377 extern symrec *sym_table;
2379 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2380 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2384 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2385 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2386 @code{init_table} as well:
2392 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2394 yyerror (char const *s)
2404 double (*fnct) (double);
2409 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2422 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2427 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2433 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2435 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2436 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2451 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2452 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2454 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2455 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2456 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2457 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2458 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2459 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2463 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2466 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2467 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2468 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2469 ptr->type = sym_type;
2470 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2471 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2477 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2480 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2481 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2482 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2488 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2489 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2490 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2491 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2493 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2494 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2495 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2496 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2497 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2498 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2500 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2501 operators in @code{yylex}.
2514 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2515 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t');
2522 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2523 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2526 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2532 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2536 static char *symbuf = 0;
2537 static int length = 0;
2542 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2543 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2545 length = 40, symbuf = (char *)malloc (length + 1);
2552 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2556 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2558 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2560 /* Get another character. */
2565 while (isalnum (c));
2572 s = getsym (symbuf);
2574 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2579 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2585 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2586 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2587 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2595 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2598 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2599 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2600 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2603 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2604 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2608 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2610 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2611 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2613 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2614 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2617 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2618 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2619 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2620 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2621 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2622 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
2623 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2624 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2627 @node Grammar Outline
2628 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2630 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2631 appropriate delimiters:
2638 @var{Bison declarations}
2647 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2648 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2649 continues until end of line.
2652 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2653 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2654 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2655 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2656 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2660 @subsection The prologue
2661 @cindex declarations section
2663 @cindex declarations
2665 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2666 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2667 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2668 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2669 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2670 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2671 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2673 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2674 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2677 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2678 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2679 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2680 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2681 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2682 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2683 @code{%union} declaration.
2694 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2698 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2699 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2705 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2706 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2707 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2708 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2709 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2710 @code{#include} directives.
2712 @node Prologue Alternatives
2713 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2714 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2717 @findex %code requires
2718 @findex %code provides
2721 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2722 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2723 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2724 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2725 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2726 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2727 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2729 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2740 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2744 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2745 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2752 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2753 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2754 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2755 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2756 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2757 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2758 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2759 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2760 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2761 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2762 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2764 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2765 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2766 This behavior raises a few questions.
2767 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2768 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2769 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2770 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2771 This behavior is not intuitive.
2773 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2774 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2775 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2776 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2783 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2784 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2787 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2788 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2800 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2804 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2805 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2806 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2813 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2814 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2815 explicit which kind you intend.
2816 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2818 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2819 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2820 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2821 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2822 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2823 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2824 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2825 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2826 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2829 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2830 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2832 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2845 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2849 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2850 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2861 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2862 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2863 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2870 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2871 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2872 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2873 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2874 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2875 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2877 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2878 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2879 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2880 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2881 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2882 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2883 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2884 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2885 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2886 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2887 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2890 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2891 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2892 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2893 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2894 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2895 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2896 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
2897 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
2898 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
2899 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
2912 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2916 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2917 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2928 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2932 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2933 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2940 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
2941 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
2942 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
2945 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
2946 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
2947 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
2948 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
2949 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
2950 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
2953 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
2954 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
2955 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
2956 the grammar file affects its functionality.
2958 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
2959 organize your grammar file.
2960 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
2964 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
2965 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
2966 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
2967 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
2969 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
2970 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
2971 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
2972 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
2976 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
2977 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
2979 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
2981 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
2982 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
2983 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
2984 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
2986 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
2987 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
2988 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
2989 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
2990 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
2991 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
2992 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
2993 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
2996 @node Bison Declarations
2997 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
2998 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
2999 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3001 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3002 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3003 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3004 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3007 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3008 @cindex grammar rules section
3009 @cindex rules section for grammar
3011 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3012 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3014 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3015 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3016 if it is the first thing in the file.
3019 @subsection The epilogue
3020 @cindex additional C code section
3022 @cindex C code, section for additional
3024 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3025 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3026 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3027 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3028 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3029 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3030 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3031 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3032 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3033 C-Language Interface}.
3035 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3036 from the grammar rules.
3038 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3039 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3040 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3041 of the grammar file.
3044 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3045 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3046 @cindex terminal symbol
3050 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3053 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3054 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3055 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3056 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3057 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3058 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3059 the symbol to stand for it.
3061 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3062 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3063 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3065 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3066 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3067 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3068 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3069 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3070 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3071 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3073 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3077 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3078 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3079 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3080 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3083 @cindex character token
3084 @cindex literal token
3085 @cindex single-character literal
3086 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3087 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3088 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3089 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3090 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3091 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3092 ,Operator Precedence}).
3094 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3095 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3096 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3097 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3098 your program will confuse other readers.
3100 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3101 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3102 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3103 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3104 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3105 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3109 @cindex string token
3110 @cindex literal string token
3111 @cindex multicharacter literal
3112 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3113 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3114 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3115 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3116 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3118 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3119 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3120 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3121 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3122 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3124 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3126 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3127 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3128 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3129 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3130 read your program will be confused.
3132 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3133 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3134 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3135 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3136 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3137 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3140 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3141 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3142 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3144 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3145 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3146 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3147 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3148 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3149 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3150 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3151 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3152 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3153 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3154 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3155 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3157 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3158 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3159 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3160 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3161 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3163 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3164 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3165 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3166 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3167 characters in the following C-language string:
3170 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3173 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3174 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3175 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3176 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3177 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3178 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3179 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3180 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3181 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3182 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3185 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3186 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3187 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3188 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3189 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3192 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3194 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3195 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3197 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3201 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3207 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3208 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3209 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3221 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3222 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3224 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3225 extra white space as you wish.
3227 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3228 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3231 @{@var{C statements}@}
3236 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3237 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3238 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3239 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3240 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3241 compiler can check it.
3243 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3244 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3245 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3246 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3247 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3248 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3249 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3250 character constants.
3252 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3256 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3257 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3261 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3262 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3269 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3271 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3272 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3273 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3290 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3294 @section Recursive Rules
3295 @cindex recursive rule
3297 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3298 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3299 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3300 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3301 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3311 @cindex left recursion
3312 @cindex right recursion
3314 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3315 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3316 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3327 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3328 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3329 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3330 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3331 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3332 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3333 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3336 @cindex mutual recursion
3337 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3338 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3339 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3347 | primary '+' primary
3359 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3363 @section Defining Language Semantics
3364 @cindex defining language semantics
3365 @cindex language semantics, defining
3367 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3368 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3369 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3371 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3372 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3373 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3374 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3377 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3378 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3379 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3380 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3381 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3382 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3383 action in the middle of a rule.
3384 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
3388 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3389 @cindex semantic value type
3390 @cindex value type, semantic
3391 @cindex data types of semantic values
3392 @cindex default data type
3394 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3395 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3396 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3397 Notation Calculator}).
3399 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3400 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3401 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3404 #define YYSTYPE double
3408 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3409 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3410 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3411 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3413 @node Multiple Types
3414 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3416 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3417 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3418 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3419 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3422 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3423 requires you to do two things:
3427 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3428 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3429 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3430 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3434 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3435 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3436 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3437 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3438 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3447 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3449 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3450 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3451 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3452 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3454 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3455 placed at any position in the rule;
3456 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3457 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3458 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3459 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3461 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3462 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3463 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3464 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3465 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3466 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3467 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3468 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3469 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3470 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3473 Here is a typical example:
3483 Or, in terms of named references:
3487 exp[result]: @dots{}
3488 | exp[left] '+' exp[right]
3489 @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3494 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3495 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3496 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3497 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3498 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3499 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3501 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3502 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3503 referred to as @code{$2}.
3505 @xref{Named References,,Using Named References}, for more information
3506 about using the named references construct.
3508 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3509 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3510 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3511 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3512 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3516 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3520 @cindex default action
3521 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3522 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3523 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3524 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3525 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3526 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3528 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3529 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3530 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3531 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3532 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3536 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3537 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3543 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3548 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3549 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3550 definition of @code{foo}.
3553 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3554 any, from a semantic action.
3555 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3556 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3559 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3560 @cindex action data types
3561 @cindex data types in actions
3563 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3564 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3566 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3567 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3568 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3569 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3570 in the rule. In this example,
3581 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3582 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3583 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3584 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3586 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3587 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3588 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3600 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3601 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3603 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3604 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3605 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3606 @cindex mid-rule actions
3608 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3609 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3610 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3612 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3613 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3614 it is run before they are parsed.
3616 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3617 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3618 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3619 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3622 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3623 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3624 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3625 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3626 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3627 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3629 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3630 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3631 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3632 at the end of the rule.
3634 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3635 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3636 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3637 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3638 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3639 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3643 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3644 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3645 declare_variable ($3); @}
3647 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3652 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3653 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3654 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3655 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3656 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3657 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3658 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3659 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3661 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3662 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3663 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3664 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3665 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3668 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3669 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3670 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3671 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3672 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3674 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3675 Discarded Symbols}).
3676 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3677 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3679 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3680 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3685 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3691 pop_context ($1); @}
3694 let: LET '(' var ')'
3695 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3696 declare_variable ($3); @}
3703 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3704 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3705 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3707 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3708 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3709 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3710 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3711 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3716 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3717 | '@{' statements '@}'
3723 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3727 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3728 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3731 | '@{' statements '@}'
3737 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3738 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3739 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3740 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3741 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3742 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3744 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3745 actions into the two rules, like this:
3749 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3750 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3751 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3752 '@{' statements '@}'
3758 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3759 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3761 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3762 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3763 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3767 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3768 declarations statements '@}'
3769 | '@{' statements '@}'
3775 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3776 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3778 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3779 serves as a subroutine:
3783 subroutine: /* empty */
3784 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3790 compound: subroutine
3791 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3793 '@{' statements '@}'
3799 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3800 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3802 @node Named References
3803 @subsection Using Named References
3804 @cindex named references
3806 While every semantic value can be accessed with positional references
3807 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$}, it's often much more convenient to refer to
3808 them by name. First of all, original symbol names may be used as named
3809 references. For example:
3813 invocation: op '(' args ')'
3814 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
3819 The positional @code{$$}, @code{@@$}, @code{$n}, and @code{@@n} can be
3820 mixed with @code{$name} and @code{@@name} arbitrarily. For example:
3824 invocation: op '(' args ')'
3825 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
3830 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
3836 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
3839 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
3842 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
3847 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
3848 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
3849 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
3852 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
3853 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
3858 Explicit names may be declared for RHS and for LHS symbols as well. In order
3859 to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an explicit name
3860 may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the closing brace of
3861 the mid-rule action code:
3864 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
3865 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
3871 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
3872 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
3875 if-stmt: IF '(' expr ')' THEN then.stmt ';'
3876 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
3880 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
3881 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
3882 @code{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
3883 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @samp{suffix} field of the semantic
3884 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @code{name.suffix} in its entirety
3885 as the name of a semantic value, bracketed syntax @code{$[name.suffix]}
3890 @section Tracking Locations
3892 @cindex textual location
3893 @cindex location, textual
3895 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3896 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3897 especially symbol locations.
3899 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3900 actions to take when rules are matched.
3903 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3904 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3905 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3909 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3910 @cindex data type of locations
3911 @cindex default location type
3913 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3914 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3916 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3917 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3918 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3919 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3923 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3932 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3933 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3934 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3935 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3936 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3938 @node Actions and Locations
3939 @subsection Actions and Locations
3940 @cindex location actions
3941 @cindex actions, location
3944 @vindex @@@var{name}
3945 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3947 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3948 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3950 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3951 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3952 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3953 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3954 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3957 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
3958 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
3959 @xref{Named References,,Using Named References}, for more information
3960 about using the named references construct.
3962 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3969 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3970 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3971 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3972 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3979 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3980 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3981 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3987 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3988 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3989 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
3992 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
3993 example above simply rewrites this way:
4006 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4007 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4008 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4015 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4016 from a semantic action.
4017 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4018 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4020 @node Location Default Action
4021 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4022 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4023 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4025 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4026 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4027 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4028 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4029 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4030 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4031 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4032 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4035 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4036 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4038 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4039 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4040 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4041 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4042 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4043 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4044 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4045 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4046 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4047 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4049 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4053 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
4057 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4058 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4059 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4060 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4064 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
4065 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4066 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
4067 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4073 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4074 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4075 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4077 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4081 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4082 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4085 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4086 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4087 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4088 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4091 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4092 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4093 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4094 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4098 @section Bison Declarations
4099 @cindex declarations, Bison
4100 @cindex Bison declarations
4102 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4103 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4106 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4107 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4108 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4109 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4111 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4112 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4113 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4114 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4117 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4118 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4119 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4120 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4121 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4122 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4123 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4124 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4125 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4126 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4127 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4128 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4129 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4130 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4134 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4135 @cindex version requirement
4136 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4139 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4140 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4144 %require "@var{version}"
4148 @subsection Token Type Names
4149 @cindex declaring token type names
4150 @cindex token type names, declaring
4151 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4154 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4160 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4161 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4162 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4164 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4165 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4166 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4169 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4170 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4171 following the token name:
4175 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4179 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4180 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4181 with each other or with normal characters.
4183 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4184 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4185 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4186 Than One Value Type}).
4192 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4196 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4200 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4201 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4202 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4209 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4210 equivalent literal string tokens:
4213 %token <operator> OR "||"
4214 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4219 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4220 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4221 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4222 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4223 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4224 the literal string instead of the token name.
4226 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4227 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4231 %token END 0 "end of file"
4234 @node Precedence Decl
4235 @subsection Operator Precedence
4236 @cindex precedence declarations
4237 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4238 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4240 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4241 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4242 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4243 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4244 operator precedence.
4246 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4247 @code{%token}: either
4250 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4257 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4260 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4261 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4262 all the @var{symbols}:
4266 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4267 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4268 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4269 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4270 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4271 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4272 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4273 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4274 considered a syntax error.
4277 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4278 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4279 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4280 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4281 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4284 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4285 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4286 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4287 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4292 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4293 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4297 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4298 @cindex declaring value types
4299 @cindex value types, declaring
4302 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4303 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4304 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4319 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4320 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4321 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4322 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4324 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4325 @code{union}. For example:
4337 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4338 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4341 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4342 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4343 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4345 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4346 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4348 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4349 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4350 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4351 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4359 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4364 and then your grammar can use the following
4365 instead of @code{%union}:
4378 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4379 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4380 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4384 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4385 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4386 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4389 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4393 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4394 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4395 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4396 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4397 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4400 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4401 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4402 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4403 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4405 @node Initial Action Decl
4406 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4407 @findex %initial-action
4409 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4410 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4413 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4414 @findex %initial-action
4415 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4416 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4417 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4418 @code{%parse-param}.
4421 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4424 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4427 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4432 @node Destructor Decl
4433 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4434 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4438 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4439 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4440 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4441 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4442 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4443 must discard the start symbol.
4445 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4446 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4447 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4448 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4450 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4451 symbol is automatically discarded.
4453 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4455 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4457 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4458 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4459 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4460 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4462 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4463 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4464 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4465 tag among @var{symbols}.
4466 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4467 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4468 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4470 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4471 (These default forms are experimental.
4472 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4474 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4475 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4476 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4477 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4479 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4480 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4481 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4482 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4483 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4490 %union @{ char *string; @}
4491 %token <string> STRING1
4492 %token <string> STRING2
4493 %type <string> string1
4494 %type <string> string2
4495 %union @{ char character; @}
4496 %token <character> CHR
4497 %type <character> chr
4500 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4501 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4502 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4503 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4507 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4508 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4509 to @code{free} by default.
4510 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4511 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4512 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4513 @code{free} only once.
4514 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4515 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4517 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4518 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4519 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4520 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4521 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4522 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4523 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4524 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4525 reference it in your grammar.
4526 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4527 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4533 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4534 @cindex mid-rule actions
4535 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4536 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4537 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you do
4538 not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}} (where
4539 @var{n} is the RHS symbol position of the mid-rule) in any later action in that
4541 However, if you do reference either, the Bison-generated parser will invoke the
4542 @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4546 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4547 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4548 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4553 @cindex discarded symbols
4554 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4558 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4560 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4562 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4563 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4565 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4568 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4569 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4572 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4573 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4574 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4578 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4579 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4580 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4581 @cindex warnings, preventing
4582 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4586 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4587 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4588 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4589 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4590 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4591 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4593 The declaration looks like this:
4599 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4600 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4601 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4602 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4604 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4605 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4606 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4607 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4608 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4609 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4610 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4616 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4620 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4621 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4622 print the number of conflicts.
4625 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4626 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4627 go back to the beginning.
4630 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4631 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4632 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4635 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4636 but will keep silent otherwise.
4639 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4640 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4641 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4642 @cindex default start symbol
4645 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4646 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4647 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4654 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4655 @cindex reentrant parser
4657 @findex %define api.pure
4659 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4660 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4661 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4662 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4663 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4664 program must be called only within interlocks.
4666 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4667 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4668 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4669 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4670 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4672 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4673 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4674 reentrant. It looks like this:
4680 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4681 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4682 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4683 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4684 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4685 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4686 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4687 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4688 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4690 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4691 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4695 @subsection A Push Parser
4698 @findex %define api.push-pull
4700 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4701 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4703 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4704 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4705 each time a new token is made available.
4707 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4708 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4709 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4710 within a certain time period.
4712 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4713 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4714 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4717 %define api.push-pull push
4720 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4721 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4722 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4723 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4724 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4728 %define api.push-pull push
4731 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4732 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4733 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4734 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4736 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4737 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4738 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4739 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4740 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4741 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4742 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4743 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4747 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4749 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4750 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4751 yypstate_delete (ps);
4754 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4755 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4756 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4757 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4758 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4759 example would thus look like this:
4764 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4767 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4768 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4769 yypstate_delete (ps);
4772 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4773 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4775 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4776 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4777 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4778 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4779 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4780 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4781 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4782 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4783 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4784 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4785 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4786 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4787 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4788 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4789 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4790 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4791 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4795 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4796 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4797 yypstate_delete (ps);
4800 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4801 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
4802 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
4805 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4806 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4807 @cindex declaration summary
4808 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4810 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4812 @deffn {Directive} %union
4813 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4814 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4817 @deffn {Directive} %token
4818 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4819 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4822 @deffn {Directive} %right
4823 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4824 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4827 @deffn {Directive} %left
4828 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4829 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4832 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4833 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4834 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4835 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4839 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4840 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4841 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4845 @deffn {Directive} %type
4846 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4847 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4850 @deffn {Directive} %start
4851 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4855 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4856 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4857 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4863 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4866 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4867 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4869 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
4870 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
4871 @xref{%code Summary}.
4874 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4875 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
4876 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
4877 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4880 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
4881 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
4882 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
4883 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
4886 @deffn {Directive} %defines
4887 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
4888 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
4889 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
4890 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
4892 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
4893 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
4894 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
4895 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
4896 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
4897 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
4898 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
4899 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
4900 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
4901 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
4903 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
4904 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
4905 (Reentrant) Parser}.
4907 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
4908 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of
4909 the @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Locations,
4910 ,Tracking Locations}.
4912 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
4913 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
4914 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
4915 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
4916 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
4918 @findex %code requires
4919 @findex %code provides
4920 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
4921 header also contains their code.
4922 @xref{%code Summary}.
4925 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
4926 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
4929 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
4930 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
4931 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
4934 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
4935 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
4936 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
4939 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
4940 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
4941 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
4942 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
4944 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
4948 @deffn {Directive} %locations
4949 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
4950 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
4951 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
4952 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
4953 accurate syntax error messages.
4956 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
4957 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
4958 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
4960 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
4961 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
4962 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
4963 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
4964 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
4965 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
4966 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
4967 For C++ parsers, see the @code{%define namespace} documentation in this
4969 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
4973 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
4974 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
4975 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
4980 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
4981 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
4982 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
4983 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
4984 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
4985 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
4986 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
4990 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
4991 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
4994 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
4995 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
4996 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5000 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5001 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5002 Require a Version of Bison}.
5005 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5006 Specify the skeleton to use.
5008 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5009 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5010 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5011 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5013 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5014 file in the Bison installation directory.
5015 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5016 directory of the grammar file.
5017 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5020 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5021 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5022 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5023 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5024 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5025 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5026 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5029 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5030 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5031 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5032 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5033 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5034 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5035 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5038 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5039 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5040 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5044 The highest token number, plus one.
5046 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5048 The number of grammar rules,
5050 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5054 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5055 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5056 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5057 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5061 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5062 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5063 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5067 @node %define Summary
5068 @subsection %define Summary
5070 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5071 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5072 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5073 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5074 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5075 @code{%define} directive:
5077 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5078 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5079 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5080 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5082 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5083 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5084 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5085 to specifying @code{""}.
5087 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5088 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5089 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5092 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5093 @code{%define} accepts.
5095 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5096 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5100 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5102 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5103 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5105 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5107 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5108 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5111 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5112 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5113 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5114 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5115 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5116 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5120 @findex %define api.pure
5123 @item Language(s): C
5125 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5126 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5128 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5130 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5134 @findex %define api.push-pull
5137 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5139 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5140 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5141 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5142 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5144 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5146 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5149 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5151 @item lr.default-reductions
5152 @cindex default reductions
5153 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5154 @cindex delayed syntax errors
5155 @cindex syntax errors delayed
5160 @item Language(s): all
5162 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5163 contain default reductions.
5164 That is, in such a state, Bison selects the reduction with the largest
5165 lookahead set to be the default parser action and then removes that
5167 (The ability to specify where default reductions should be used is
5169 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5171 @item Accepted Values:
5174 This is the traditional Bison behavior. The main advantage is a
5175 significant decrease in the size of the parser tables. The
5176 disadvantage is that, when the generated parser encounters a
5177 syntactically unacceptable token, the parser might then perform
5178 unnecessary default reductions before it can detect the syntax error.
5179 Such delayed syntax error detection is usually inherent in LALR and
5180 IELR parser tables anyway due to LR state merging (@pxref{%define
5181 Summary,,lr.type}). Furthermore, the use of @code{%nonassoc} can
5182 contribute to delayed syntax error detection even in the case of
5183 canonical LR. As an experimental feature, delayed syntax error
5184 detection can be overcome in all cases by enabling LAC (@pxref{%define
5185 Summary,,parse.lac}, for details, including a discussion of the
5186 effects of delayed syntax error detection).
5188 @item @code{consistent}.
5189 @cindex consistent states
5190 A consistent state is a state that has only one possible action.
5191 If that action is a reduction, then the parser does not need to request
5192 a lookahead token from the scanner before performing that action.
5193 However, the parser recognizes the ability to ignore the lookahead token
5194 in this way only when such a reduction is encoded as a default
5196 Thus, if default reductions are permitted only in consistent states,
5197 then a canonical LR parser that does not employ
5198 @code{%nonassoc} detects a syntax error as soon as it @emph{needs} the
5199 syntactically unacceptable token from the scanner.
5201 @item @code{accepting}.
5202 @cindex accepting state
5203 In the accepting state, the default reduction is actually the accept
5205 In this case, a canonical LR parser that does not employ
5206 @code{%nonassoc} detects a syntax error as soon as it @emph{reaches} the
5207 syntactically unacceptable token in the input.
5208 That is, it does not perform any extra reductions.
5211 @item Default Value:
5213 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5214 @item @code{all} otherwise.
5218 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5220 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5221 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5224 @item Language(s): all
5226 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5227 remain in the parser tables.
5228 Bison considers a state to be unreachable if there exists no sequence of
5229 transitions from the start state to that state.
5230 A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison disables a
5231 shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
5232 Keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful for analysis purposes, but they
5233 are useless in the generated parser.
5235 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5237 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5243 @item Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in
5245 Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are irrelevant to
5246 your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are relevant.
5247 Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a parser table
5248 analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this behavior will likely
5249 remain in future Bison releases.
5251 @item While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
5252 remove other kinds of useless states.
5253 Specifically, when Bison disables reduce actions during conflict resolution,
5254 some goto actions may become useless, and thus some additional states may
5256 If Bison were to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those
5257 actions, it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those
5259 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
5263 @c ================================================== lr.type
5266 @findex %define lr.type
5272 @item Language(s): all
5274 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5276 (This feature is experimental.
5277 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5279 @item Accepted Values:
5282 While Bison generates LALR parser tables by default for
5283 historical reasons, IELR or canonical LR is almost
5284 always preferable for deterministic parsers.
5285 The trouble is that LALR parser tables can suffer from
5286 mysterious conflicts and thus may not accept the full set of sentences
5287 that IELR and canonical LR accept.
5288 @xref{Mystery Conflicts}, for details.
5289 However, there are at least two scenarios where LALR may be
5292 @cindex GLR with LALR
5293 @item When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you
5294 do not resolve any conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left}
5295 or @code{%prec}), then the parser explores all potential parses of any
5297 In this case, the use of LALR parser tables is guaranteed not
5298 to alter the language accepted by the parser.
5299 LALR parser tables are the smallest parser tables Bison can
5300 currently generate, so they may be preferable.
5301 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically,
5302 GLR begins to behave more like a deterministic parser, and so
5303 IELR and canonical LR can be helpful to avoid
5304 LALR's mysterious behavior.
5306 @item Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar
5307 with a major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or
5308 canonical LR parser table generation algorithm.
5309 LALR can be a quick way to generate parser tables in order to
5310 investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle differences
5311 from IELR and canonical LR.
5315 IELR is a minimal LR algorithm.
5316 That is, given any grammar (LR or non-LR),
5317 IELR and canonical LR always accept exactly the same
5319 However, as for LALR, the number of parser states is often an
5320 order of magnitude less for IELR than for canonical
5322 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states
5323 may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR
5324 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR is often an order
5325 of magnitude less as well.
5326 This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing of a grammar.
5328 @item @code{canonical-lr}.
5329 @cindex delayed syntax errors
5330 @cindex syntax errors delayed
5333 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting
5334 means to explore a grammar because they have a property that IELR and
5335 LALR tables do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and
5336 default reductions are left disabled (@pxref{%define
5337 Summary,,lr.default-reductions}), then, for every left context of
5338 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
5339 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically
5340 acceptable in that left context. It might then seem that an advantage
5341 of canonical LR parsers in production is that, under the above
5342 constraints, they are guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as
5343 possible without performing any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR
5344 parsers using LAC (@pxref{%define Summary,,parse.lac}) are also able
5345 to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
5349 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5353 @findex %define namespace
5356 @item Languages(s): C++
5358 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5359 For example, if you specify:
5362 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5365 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5368 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5371 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5372 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5375 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5381 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5382 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5383 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5385 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5387 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5388 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5389 lexical analyzer function.
5390 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5391 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5392 lexical analyzer function.
5393 For example, if you specify:
5396 %define namespace "foo"
5397 %name-prefix "bar::"
5400 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5404 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5406 @findex %define parse.lac
5408 @cindex lookahead correction
5411 @item Languages(s): C
5413 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5414 syntax error handling.
5416 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer
5417 from a couple of problems upon encountering a syntax error. First, the
5418 parser might perform additional parser stack reductions before
5419 discovering the syntax error. Such reductions perform user semantic
5420 actions that are unexpected because they are based on an invalid token,
5421 and they cause error recovery to begin in a different syntactic context
5422 than the one in which the invalid token was encountered. Second, when
5423 verbose error messages are enabled (with @code{%error-verbose} or
5424 @code{#define YYERROR_VERBOSE}), the expected token list in the syntax
5425 error message can both contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
5427 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default
5428 reductions in inconsistent states, and parser state merging. Thus,
5429 IELR and LALR suffer the most. Canonical
5430 LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
5431 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
5433 LAC is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm that
5434 completely solves these problems for canonical LR,
5435 IELR, and LALR without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc},
5436 default reductions, or state mering. Conceptually, the mechanism is
5437 straight-forward. Whenever the parser fetches a new token from the
5438 scanner so that it can determine the next parser action, it immediately
5439 suspends normal parsing and performs an exploratory parse using a
5440 temporary copy of the normal parser state stack. During this
5441 exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic actions.
5442 If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing then
5443 resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
5444 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
5445 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
5446 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each
5447 token in the grammar.
5449 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a
5450 consistent parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not
5451 attempt to fetch a token from the scanner because no lookahead is
5452 needed to determine the next parser action. Thus, whether default
5453 reductions are enabled in consistent states (@pxref{%define
5454 Summary,,lr.default-reductions}) affects how soon the parser detects a
5455 syntax error: when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous token or when it
5456 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead. The latter
5457 behavior is probably more intuitive, so Bison currently provides no
5458 way to achieve the former behavior while default reductions are fully
5461 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether
5462 to enable default reductions in consistent states, canonical
5463 LR and IELR behave exactly the same for both
5464 syntactically acceptable and syntactically unacceptable input. While
5465 LALR still does not support the full language-recognition
5466 power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at
5467 least enables LALR's syntax error handling to correctly
5468 reflect LALR's language-recognition power.
5470 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice,
5471 it can have a performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must
5472 be performed twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions
5473 in consistent states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate
5474 an exploratory parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a
5475 parse are often the file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the
5476 scanner, and the user's semantic actions, but none of these are
5477 performed during the exploratory parse. Finally, the base of the
5478 temporary stack used during an exploratory parse is a pointer into the
5479 normal parser state stack so that the stack is never physically copied.
5480 In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC has proven
5481 insignificant for practical grammars.
5483 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5485 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5491 @subsection %code Summary
5495 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5496 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5497 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5498 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5499 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5500 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5501 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5502 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5504 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5505 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5506 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5507 in the parser implementation.
5509 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5510 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5511 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5513 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5516 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5517 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5518 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5519 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5520 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5521 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5525 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5526 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5527 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5530 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5531 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5535 @findex %code requires
5538 @item Language(s): C, C++
5540 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5541 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5542 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5543 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5544 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5546 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5547 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5552 @findex %code provides
5555 @item Language(s): C, C++
5557 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5558 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5560 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5561 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5569 @item Language(s): C, C++
5571 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5572 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5573 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5574 parser implementation file. For example:
5583 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5587 @findex %code imports
5590 @item Language(s): Java
5592 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5594 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5595 before any class definitions.
5599 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5600 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5601 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5602 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5605 @node Multiple Parsers
5606 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5608 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5609 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5610 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5611 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5613 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5614 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5615 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5616 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5617 names that do not conflict.
5619 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5620 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5621 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5622 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5623 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5624 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5625 @code{clex}, and so on.
5627 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5628 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5629 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5630 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5631 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5633 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5634 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5635 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5636 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5639 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5640 @cindex C-language interface
5643 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5644 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5645 functions that it needs to use.
5647 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5648 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5649 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5650 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5653 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5654 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5655 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5656 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5657 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5658 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5660 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5661 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5662 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5666 @node Parser Function
5667 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5670 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5671 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5672 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5673 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5674 without reading further.
5677 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5678 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5679 is due to end-of-input).
5681 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5682 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5685 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5688 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5693 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5698 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5701 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5702 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5703 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5705 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5706 @findex %parse-param
5707 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5708 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5709 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5710 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5711 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5714 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5717 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5718 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5722 Then call the parser like this:
5726 int nastiness, randomness;
5727 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5728 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5734 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5737 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5740 @node Push Parser Function
5741 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5742 @findex yypush_parse
5744 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5745 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5747 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5748 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5749 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5750 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5752 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5753 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5754 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5755 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5758 @node Pull Parser Function
5759 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5760 @findex yypull_parse
5762 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5763 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5765 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5766 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5767 declaration is used.
5768 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5770 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5771 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5774 @node Parser Create Function
5775 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5776 @findex yypstate_new
5778 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5779 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5781 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5782 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5783 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5784 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5786 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5787 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5788 or 0 if no memory was available.
5789 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5793 @node Parser Delete Function
5794 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5795 @findex yypstate_delete
5797 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5798 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5800 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5801 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5802 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5803 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5805 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5806 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5807 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5811 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5813 @cindex lexical analyzer
5815 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5816 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5817 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5818 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5820 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5821 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5822 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5823 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5824 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5825 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5826 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5830 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5831 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5832 of the token it has read.
5833 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5834 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5836 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5837 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5840 @node Calling Convention
5841 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5843 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5844 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5845 signifies end-of-input.
5847 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5848 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5849 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5850 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5852 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5853 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5854 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5855 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5856 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5857 signifies end-of-input.
5859 Here is an example showing these things:
5866 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5869 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5870 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5872 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5878 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5879 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5881 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5882 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5886 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5887 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5888 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5889 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5892 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5893 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5894 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5895 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5896 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5899 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5900 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5901 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5902 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5905 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5908 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5909 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5910 strlen (token_buffer))
5911 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5912 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5917 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5918 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5922 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5925 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5926 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5927 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5928 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5934 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5935 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5940 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5941 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5942 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5943 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5944 declaration looks like this:
5957 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5962 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5963 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5968 @node Token Locations
5969 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5972 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Locations, ,
5973 Tracking Locations}) in actions to keep track of the textual locations
5974 of tokens and groupings, then you must provide this information in
5975 @code{yylex}. The function @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual
5976 location of a token just parsed in the global variable @code{yylloc}.
5977 So @code{yylex} must store the proper data in that variable.
5979 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5980 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5981 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5982 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5983 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5986 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5989 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5991 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
5992 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5993 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5994 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5995 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5996 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6001 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6004 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6005 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6010 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6011 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6012 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6016 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
6017 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6020 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
6022 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
6023 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
6029 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6030 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6031 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6035 results in the following signature:
6038 int yylex (int *nastiness);
6039 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6042 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
6045 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
6046 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6050 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6053 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6054 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6057 @node Error Reporting
6058 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6059 @cindex error reporting function
6062 @cindex syntax error
6064 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
6065 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6066 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6067 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6070 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6071 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6072 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6073 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6074 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6076 @findex %error-verbose
6077 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison
6078 declarations section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations
6079 Section}), then Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message
6080 string instead of just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6082 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6083 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6084 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6085 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6086 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6087 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6089 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6090 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6091 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6093 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6098 yyerror (char const *s)
6102 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6107 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6108 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6109 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6110 immediately return 1.
6112 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6113 an access to the current location.
6114 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6115 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6116 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6120 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6121 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6124 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6127 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6128 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6131 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6132 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6133 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6134 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
6138 /* Location tracking. */
6142 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6144 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6145 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6149 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6152 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6153 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6154 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6155 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6160 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6161 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6162 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6163 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6164 message is always passed last.
6166 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6167 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6168 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6172 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6173 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6174 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6175 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6177 @node Action Features
6178 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6179 @cindex summary, action features
6180 @cindex action features summary
6182 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6183 are useful in actions.
6185 @deffn {Variable} $$
6186 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6187 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6190 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6191 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6192 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6195 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6196 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6197 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6198 Types of Values in Actions}.
6201 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6202 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6203 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6204 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6207 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
6208 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6209 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6212 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
6213 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6214 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6217 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
6219 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6220 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6221 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6222 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6223 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6224 going to be reduced by this rule.
6226 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6227 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6228 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6231 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6234 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6236 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6239 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6241 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6245 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
6247 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6248 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6249 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6250 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6251 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6254 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6255 @findex YYRECOVERING
6256 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6257 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6258 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6261 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6262 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6263 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6264 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6265 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6267 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6270 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
6271 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6273 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6275 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6278 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
6279 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6280 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6281 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6284 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6285 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6286 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6287 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6289 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6292 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6293 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6294 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6295 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6297 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6302 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
6303 of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
6304 Tracking Locations}.
6306 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6310 @c int first_line, last_line;
6311 @c int first_column, last_column;
6315 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6316 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6318 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6319 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6320 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6323 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6326 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6328 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
6329 of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
6330 Tracking Locations}.
6333 @node Internationalization
6334 @section Parser Internationalization
6335 @cindex internationalization
6341 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6342 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6343 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6344 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6345 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6346 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6347 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6348 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6351 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6352 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6353 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6358 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6359 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6360 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6361 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6362 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6366 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6371 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6372 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6373 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6374 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6375 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6376 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6377 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6378 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6379 Bison-generated parser.
6382 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6383 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6384 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6388 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6391 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6392 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6393 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6397 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6398 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6399 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6402 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6408 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6412 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6418 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6419 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6420 @cindex algorithm of parser
6423 @cindex parser stack
6424 @cindex stack, parser
6426 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6427 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6428 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6430 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6431 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6434 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6435 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6436 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6437 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6438 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6439 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6440 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6442 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6449 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6450 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6453 expr: expr '*' expr;
6457 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6464 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6465 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6467 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6468 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6469 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6471 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6474 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6475 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6476 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6477 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6478 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6479 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6480 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
6481 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6482 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6486 @section Lookahead Tokens
6487 @cindex lookahead token
6489 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6490 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6491 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6492 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6493 token in order to decide what to do.
6495 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6496 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6497 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6498 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6499 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6500 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6501 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6504 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6505 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6506 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6523 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6524 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6525 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6526 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6527 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6529 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6530 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6531 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6532 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6533 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6534 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6539 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6540 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6541 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6542 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6545 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6547 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6548 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6549 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6551 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6552 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6558 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6564 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6565 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6567 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6568 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6569 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6570 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6573 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6574 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6575 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6576 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6577 contrast it with the other alternative.
6579 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6580 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6584 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6586 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6589 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6590 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6591 making these two inputs equivalent:
6594 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6596 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6599 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6600 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6601 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6602 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6603 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6604 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6605 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6606 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6608 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6609 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6610 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6611 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6613 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6615 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6616 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6617 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6622 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6634 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6643 @section Operator Precedence
6644 @cindex operator precedence
6645 @cindex precedence of operators
6647 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6648 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6649 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6650 shift and when to reduce.
6653 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6654 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6655 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6656 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6659 @node Why Precedence
6660 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6662 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6663 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6677 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6678 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6679 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6680 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6681 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6682 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6683 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6686 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6687 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6688 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6689 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6690 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6691 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6692 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6693 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6696 @cindex associativity
6697 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6698 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6699 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6700 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6701 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6702 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6703 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6704 makes right-associativity.
6706 @node Using Precedence
6707 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6712 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6713 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6714 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6715 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6716 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6717 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6718 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6721 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6722 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6723 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6724 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6725 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6727 @node Precedence Examples
6728 @subsection Precedence Examples
6730 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6738 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6739 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6740 declared with @code{'-'}:
6743 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6749 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6750 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6751 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6753 @node How Precedence
6754 @subsection How Precedence Works
6756 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6757 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6758 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6759 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6760 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6761 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6763 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6764 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6765 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6766 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6767 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6768 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6769 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6772 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6773 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6775 @node Contextual Precedence
6776 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6777 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6778 @cindex unary operator precedence
6779 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6780 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6783 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6784 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6785 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6786 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6788 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6789 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6790 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6791 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6794 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6795 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6796 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6797 modifier's syntax is:
6800 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6804 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6805 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6806 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6807 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6808 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6810 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6811 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6812 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6822 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6829 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6834 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6835 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6836 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6837 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6839 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6840 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6841 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6842 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6844 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6845 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6846 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6847 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6848 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6849 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6851 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6852 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6856 @section Parser States
6857 @cindex finite-state machine
6858 @cindex parser state
6859 @cindex state (of parser)
6861 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6862 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6863 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6864 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6865 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6867 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6868 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6869 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6870 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6871 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6872 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6873 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6874 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6877 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6878 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6879 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6882 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6883 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6884 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6886 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6887 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6890 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6891 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6894 sequence: /* empty */
6895 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6898 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6901 maybeword: /* empty */
6902 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6904 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6909 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6910 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6911 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6912 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6913 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6914 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6916 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6917 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6918 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6920 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6921 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6922 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6923 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6924 In this example, the output of the program changes.
6926 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6927 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6928 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6929 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6932 sequence: /* empty */
6933 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6935 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6939 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6942 sequence: /* empty */
6944 | sequence redirects
6951 redirects:/* empty */
6952 | redirects redirect
6957 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6958 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6959 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6960 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6961 in infinitely many ways!
6963 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6964 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6965 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6966 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6968 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6972 sequence: /* empty */
6978 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6982 sequence: /* empty */
6984 | sequence redirects
6992 | redirects redirect
6996 @node Mystery Conflicts
6997 @section Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6999 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7007 def: param_spec return_spec ','
7011 | name_list ':' type
7029 | name ',' name_list
7034 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7035 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7036 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7037 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7041 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7043 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7044 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7045 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7047 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7048 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7049 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7050 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7051 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7052 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7053 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7055 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the
7056 non-LR(1) class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties
7057 beyond just mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix
7058 all these problems is to select a different parser table generation
7059 algorithm. Either IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the
7060 former is more efficient and easier to debug during development.
7061 @xref{%define Summary,,lr.type}, for details. (Bison's IELR(1) and
7062 canonical LR(1) implementations are experimental. More user feedback
7063 will help to stabilize them.)
7065 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7066 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7067 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7068 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7069 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7080 /* This rule is never used. */
7086 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7087 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7088 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7089 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7090 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7091 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7093 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7094 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7095 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7096 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7097 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7098 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7103 | name_list ':' type
7111 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7112 generators, please see:
7113 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of
7114 LALR(1) Look-Ahead Sets, @cite{ACM Transactions on
7115 Programming Languages and Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982),
7116 pp.@: 615--649 @uref{http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/69622.357187}.
7118 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7119 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7121 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7122 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7123 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7125 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7126 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7127 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7128 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7129 context-free languages.
7130 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7131 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7132 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7133 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7134 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7135 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mystery Conflicts}),
7136 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7137 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7139 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7140 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7141 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7142 parser uses the same basic
7143 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7144 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7145 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7146 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7148 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7149 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7150 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7151 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7152 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7154 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7155 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7156 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7157 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7158 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7159 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7160 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7161 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7162 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7163 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7164 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7167 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7168 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7169 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7170 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7171 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7172 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7173 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7174 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7175 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7176 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7177 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7178 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7180 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7181 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7182 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7184 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7185 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7186 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7187 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7188 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7189 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7190 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7191 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7192 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7193 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7194 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7195 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7197 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, please see: Elizabeth
7198 Scott, Adrian Johnstone and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain, Tomita-Style
7199 Generalised LR Parsers, Royal Holloway, University of
7200 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12,
7201 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps},
7204 @node Memory Management
7205 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7206 @cindex memory exhaustion
7207 @cindex memory management
7208 @cindex stack overflow
7209 @cindex parser stack overflow
7210 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7212 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7213 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7214 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7216 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7217 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7218 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7221 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7222 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7223 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7224 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7226 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7227 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7228 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7229 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7230 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7231 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7233 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7234 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7235 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7238 @cindex default stack limit
7239 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7243 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7244 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7245 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7246 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7247 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7249 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7251 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7252 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7253 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7254 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7255 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7256 this deficiency in a future release.
7258 @node Error Recovery
7259 @chapter Error Recovery
7260 @cindex error recovery
7261 @cindex recovery from errors
7263 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7264 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7265 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7268 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7269 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7270 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7271 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7272 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7273 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7274 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7277 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7278 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7279 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7280 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7281 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7282 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7287 stmnts: /* empty string */
7293 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7294 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
7296 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7297 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7298 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7299 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7300 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
7301 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7302 applicable in the ordinary way.
7304 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7305 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7306 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7307 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7308 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
7309 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7310 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7311 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7312 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7313 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7314 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7315 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7317 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7318 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7319 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7322 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7325 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7326 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7327 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7328 spurious error message:
7331 primary: '(' expr ')'
7337 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7338 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7339 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7340 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7341 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7342 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7343 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7346 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7347 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7348 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7349 error messages resume.
7351 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7352 as any other rules can.
7355 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7356 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7357 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7358 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7361 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7362 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7363 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7365 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7367 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7368 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7369 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7370 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7371 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7373 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7374 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7375 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7376 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7379 @node Context Dependency
7380 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7382 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7383 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7384 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7385 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7389 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7390 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7391 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7392 error recovery rules must be written.
7395 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7396 neither clean nor robust.)
7398 @node Semantic Tokens
7399 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7401 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7402 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7408 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7409 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7410 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7412 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7413 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7414 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7415 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7416 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7418 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7419 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7420 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7421 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7422 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7423 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7424 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7426 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7427 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7428 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7429 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7433 typedef int foo, bar;
7436 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7437 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7442 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7443 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7445 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7446 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7447 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7448 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7449 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7453 declarator maybeasm '='
7455 | declarator maybeasm
7459 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
7461 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7466 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7467 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7468 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7470 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7471 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7472 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7473 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7474 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7475 the syntactic context.
7477 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7478 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7479 @cindex lexical tie-in
7481 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7482 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7485 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7486 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7487 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7488 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7489 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7496 void yyerror (char const *);
7510 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7524 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7525 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7526 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7528 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
7529 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
7530 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
7533 @node Tie-in Recovery
7534 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7536 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7537 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7539 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7540 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7541 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7542 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7546 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7553 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7554 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7555 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7556 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7557 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7559 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7561 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7562 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7563 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7575 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7576 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7577 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7578 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7580 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7581 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7582 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7583 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7584 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7585 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7588 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7591 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7593 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
7594 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
7595 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
7596 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
7597 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
7598 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
7601 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7602 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7606 @section Understanding Your Parser
7608 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
7609 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
7610 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
7611 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
7612 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
7614 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
7615 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
7616 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
7617 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
7618 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
7619 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
7620 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
7622 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
7639 @command{bison} reports:
7642 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
7643 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
7644 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
7645 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
7646 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
7649 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
7650 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
7651 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
7652 interpretation is the same.
7654 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
7655 to precedence and/or associativity:
7658 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
7659 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
7660 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
7665 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
7668 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7669 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7670 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7671 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
7675 @cindex token, useless
7676 @cindex useless token
7677 @cindex nonterminal, useless
7678 @cindex useless nonterminal
7679 @cindex rule, useless
7680 @cindex useless rule
7681 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
7682 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
7683 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
7684 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
7688 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
7691 Terminals unused in grammar:
7694 Rules useless in grammar:
7699 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
7705 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
7706 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
7707 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
7708 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
7709 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
7714 and reports the uses of the symbols:
7717 Terminals, with rules where they appear
7727 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
7732 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
7737 @cindex pointed rule
7738 @cindex rule, pointed
7739 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
7740 with it set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
7741 item is a production rule together with a point (marked by @samp{.})
7742 that the input cursor.
7747 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7749 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7754 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
7755 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
7756 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
7757 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
7758 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
7759 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted on
7760 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
7761 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
7763 @cindex core, item set
7764 @cindex item set core
7765 @cindex kernel, item set
7766 @cindex item set core
7767 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
7768 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
7769 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
7770 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
7771 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
7772 @option{--report=itemset} to list all the items, include those that can
7778 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7779 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
7780 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
7781 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
7782 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
7783 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
7785 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7796 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
7798 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
7802 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
7803 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
7804 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
7805 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
7810 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
7811 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7812 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7813 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7814 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7816 $ shift, and go to state 3
7817 '+' shift, and go to state 4
7818 '-' shift, and go to state 5
7819 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7820 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7824 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
7825 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead if
7826 @samp{+}, it will be shifted on the parse stack, and the automaton
7827 control will jump to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp
7828 '+' . exp}. Since there is no default action, any other token than
7829 those listed above will trigger a syntax error.
7831 @cindex accepting state
7832 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
7838 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
7844 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
7845 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
7847 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
7853 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
7855 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7861 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
7863 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7869 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
7871 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7877 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
7879 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7884 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
7890 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7891 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
7892 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7893 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7894 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7896 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7897 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7899 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
7900 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
7903 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
7904 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
7905 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
7906 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
7907 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
7908 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
7909 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
7910 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
7912 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
7913 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7914 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
7917 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
7918 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
7919 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
7920 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
7921 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
7922 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
7923 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
7924 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
7925 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
7926 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
7927 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
7928 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
7933 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7934 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
7935 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7936 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7937 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7939 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7940 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7942 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
7943 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
7946 The remaining states are similar:
7951 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7952 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7953 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
7954 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7955 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7957 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7958 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7960 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
7961 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
7965 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7966 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7967 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7968 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
7969 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7971 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7973 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
7974 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
7978 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7979 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7980 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7981 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7982 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
7984 '+' shift, and go to state 4
7985 '-' shift, and go to state 5
7986 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7987 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7989 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7990 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7991 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7992 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7993 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
7997 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
7998 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
7999 @samp{*}, but also because the
8000 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8004 @section Tracing Your Parser
8007 @cindex tracing the parser
8009 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
8010 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
8012 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8015 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8017 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8018 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8019 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8020 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8023 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8024 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8025 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8027 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8029 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
8030 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
8031 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
8032 preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to
8034 the preferred solution.
8037 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8040 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8041 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8042 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8043 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8044 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8045 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8047 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8048 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8049 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8050 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8052 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8053 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8054 messages tell you these things:
8058 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8061 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8062 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8065 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8066 of the state stack afterward.
8069 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8070 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8071 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8072 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8073 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8074 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8075 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8076 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8077 grammar are to blame.
8079 The parser implementation file is a C program and you can use C
8080 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8081 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8082 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8083 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8086 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8087 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8088 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8089 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8090 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8091 value (from @code{yylval}).
8093 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8094 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8098 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8099 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
8102 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8105 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8108 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8109 else if (type == NUM)
8110 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8114 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8117 @chapter Invoking Bison
8118 @cindex invoking Bison
8119 @cindex Bison invocation
8120 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8122 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8128 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8129 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8130 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8131 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8132 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8133 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8134 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8135 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8136 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8137 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8138 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8143 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8146 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8149 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8152 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8154 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8155 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8156 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8159 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8160 in alphabetical order by short options.
8161 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8162 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8166 @section Bison Options
8168 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8169 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8170 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8171 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8172 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8175 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8176 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8179 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8185 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8189 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8191 @item --print-localedir
8192 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8194 @item --print-datadir
8195 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8199 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8200 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8201 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8202 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8203 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8204 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8205 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8206 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8207 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8208 for compatibility with POSIX:
8215 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8216 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8217 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8218 this option is specified.
8220 @item -W [@var{category}]
8221 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8222 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8225 @item midrule-values
8226 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8228 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8231 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8234 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8235 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8238 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8241 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8242 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8243 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8247 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8252 Turn off all the warnings.
8254 Treat warnings as errors.
8257 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8258 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8259 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8268 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
8269 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8270 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8272 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8273 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8274 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8275 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8276 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8277 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
8278 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8282 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8285 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8286 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8287 definition for @var{name}.
8289 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8290 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8291 definitions for @var{name}.
8293 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8294 definitions for @var{name}.
8297 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8298 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8299 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8301 @item -L @var{language}
8302 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8303 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8304 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8305 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8306 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8308 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8312 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8314 @item -p @var{prefix}
8315 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8316 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8317 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8321 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8322 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8323 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8324 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8325 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8326 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8329 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8330 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8331 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8333 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8334 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8335 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8336 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8338 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8339 file in the Bison installation directory.
8340 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8341 current working directory.
8342 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8345 @itemx --token-table
8346 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8353 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8354 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8355 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8356 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8359 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8360 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8361 with other short options.
8363 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8364 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8365 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8366 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8368 @item -r @var{things}
8369 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8370 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8371 separated list of @var{things} among:
8375 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8379 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8380 each rule's lookahead set.
8383 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8384 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8387 @item --report-file=@var{file}
8388 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
8392 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8393 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
8394 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8397 @itemx --output=@var{file}
8398 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
8400 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
8401 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
8403 @item -g [@var{file}]
8404 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
8405 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
8406 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
8407 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
8408 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8409 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8412 @item -x [@var{file}]
8413 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
8414 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
8415 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8416 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8418 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
8419 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8422 @node Option Cross Key
8423 @section Option Cross Key
8425 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
8426 the corresponding short option and directive.
8428 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
8429 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
8430 @include cross-options.texi
8434 @section Yacc Library
8436 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
8437 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
8438 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
8439 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
8440 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
8441 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
8442 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
8444 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
8445 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
8448 int yyerror (char const *);
8451 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
8452 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
8453 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
8459 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
8461 @node Other Languages
8462 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
8465 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
8466 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
8470 @section C++ Parsers
8473 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
8474 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
8475 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
8476 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8477 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
8478 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
8481 @node C++ Bison Interface
8482 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
8483 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
8487 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
8488 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8489 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
8490 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8492 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
8494 @findex %define namespace
8495 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
8496 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
8497 generated in the following files:
8502 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
8503 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
8506 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
8509 @itemx @var{file}.cc
8510 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
8511 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
8512 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
8513 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
8515 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
8516 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
8517 @samp{%defines} directive.
8520 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
8521 for a complete and accurate documentation.
8523 @node C++ Semantic Values
8524 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
8525 @c - No objects in unions
8527 @c - Printer and destructor
8529 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
8530 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
8531 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
8532 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
8533 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
8536 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
8537 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
8538 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
8540 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
8541 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
8542 to such objects are allowed.
8545 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
8546 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
8547 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
8551 @node C++ Location Values
8552 @subsection C++ Location Values
8556 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
8558 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
8559 location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}. Two
8560 auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point in a file,
8561 and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
8562 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files).
8564 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
8565 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
8566 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
8567 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
8568 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
8571 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
8572 The line, starting at 1.
8575 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8576 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
8579 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
8580 The column, starting at 0.
8583 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8584 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
8587 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8588 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8589 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8590 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8591 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
8594 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
8595 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
8596 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
8597 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
8600 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
8601 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
8602 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8605 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8606 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8607 Advance the @code{end} position.
8610 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
8611 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
8612 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
8613 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
8616 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
8617 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
8621 @node C++ Parser Interface
8622 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
8623 @c - define parser_class_name
8625 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8627 @c - Reporting errors
8629 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
8630 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
8631 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
8632 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
8633 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
8634 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
8635 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
8636 additional argument for its constructor.
8638 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
8639 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
8640 The types for semantics value and locations.
8643 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
8644 A structure that contains (only) the definition of the tokens as the
8645 @code{yytokentype} enumeration. To refer to the token @code{FOO}, the
8646 scanner should use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
8647 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
8648 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
8651 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8652 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
8653 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
8656 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
8657 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
8660 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
8661 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
8662 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
8666 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
8667 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
8668 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
8669 or nonzero, full tracing.
8672 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
8673 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
8674 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
8675 described by @var{m}.
8679 @node C++ Scanner Interface
8680 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
8681 @c - prefix for yylex.
8682 @c - Pure interface to yylex
8685 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
8686 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
8687 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
8689 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8690 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8691 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
8692 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
8696 @node A Complete C++ Example
8697 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
8699 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
8700 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
8701 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
8702 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
8703 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
8704 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
8705 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
8706 actually easier to interface with.
8709 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
8710 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
8711 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
8712 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
8713 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
8716 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8717 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8719 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
8720 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
8721 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
8722 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
8723 of valid input follows.
8727 seven := one + two * three
8731 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
8732 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
8734 @c - A place to store error messages
8735 @c - A place for the result
8737 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
8738 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
8739 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
8740 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
8741 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
8742 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
8743 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
8745 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
8746 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
8747 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
8750 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8752 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8753 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8756 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
8761 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
8762 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
8763 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
8764 factor both as follows.
8766 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8768 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
8770 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
8771 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
8772 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
8773 calcxx_driver& driver)
8774 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
8779 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
8782 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8784 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
8789 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
8791 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
8797 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
8798 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
8800 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8802 // Handling the scanner.
8805 bool trace_scanning;
8809 Similarly for the parser itself.
8811 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8813 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
8814 int parse (const std::string& f);
8820 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
8821 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
8822 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
8823 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
8825 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8828 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
8829 void error (const std::string& m);
8831 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8834 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
8835 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
8836 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
8837 messages and set error state.
8839 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
8841 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
8842 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
8844 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
8845 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
8847 variables["one"] = 1;
8848 variables["two"] = 2;
8851 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
8856 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
8860 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
8861 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
8862 int res = parser.parse ();
8868 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
8870 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
8874 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
8876 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
8881 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
8883 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
8884 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
8885 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
8886 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
8889 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8891 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
8892 %require "@value{VERSION}"
8894 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
8898 @findex %code requires
8899 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
8900 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
8901 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
8902 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
8903 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
8904 use a forward declaration of the driver.
8905 @xref{%code Summary}.
8907 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8911 class calcxx_driver;
8916 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
8917 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
8920 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8922 // The parsing context.
8923 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
8924 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
8928 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
8929 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
8930 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
8931 automatically propagated.
8933 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8938 // Initialize the initial location.
8939 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
8944 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose
8947 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8954 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
8957 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8969 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
8970 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
8972 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8975 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
8981 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
8982 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
8983 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
8984 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
8987 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8989 %token END 0 "end of file"
8991 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
8992 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
8997 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
9000 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9001 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9003 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
9004 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
9006 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <ival>
9010 The grammar itself is straightforward.
9012 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9016 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9018 assignments: assignments assignment @{@}
9019 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
9022 "identifier" ":=" exp
9023 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
9027 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9028 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9029 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9030 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9031 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
9032 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
9037 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9040 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9043 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
9044 const std::string& m)
9046 driver.error (l, m);
9050 @node Calc++ Scanner
9051 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9053 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9054 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9056 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9058 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9063 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9064 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9066 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9067 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9068 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9069 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
9073 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
9074 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
9075 not of token_type. */
9076 #define yyterminate() return token::END
9081 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9082 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9083 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9084 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
9086 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9088 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9092 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9094 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9096 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9102 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9103 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9104 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
9105 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
9106 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9107 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9108 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9110 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9113 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
9119 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
9120 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
9124 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
9125 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
9126 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
9127 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
9129 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9132 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
9134 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
9135 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
9136 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
9139 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9140 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9141 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
9143 return token::NUMBER;
9145 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
9146 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
9151 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
9152 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9154 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9157 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9159 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9162 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9164 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file);
9170 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9176 @node Calc++ Top Level
9177 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9179 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9181 @comment file: calc++.cc
9184 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9187 main (int argc, char *argv[])
9189 calcxx_driver driver;
9190 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
9191 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
9192 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9193 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
9194 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9195 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
9196 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9201 @section Java Parsers
9204 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
9205 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
9206 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
9207 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9208 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
9209 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
9210 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9211 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
9214 @node Java Bison Interface
9215 @subsection Java Bison Interface
9216 @c - %language "Java"
9218 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
9219 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9221 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
9222 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
9224 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9225 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
9226 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
9227 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
9228 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
9229 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
9230 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
9231 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
9232 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
9233 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
9235 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
9237 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
9238 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
9239 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
9240 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
9243 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
9244 api.push-pull} have no effect.
9246 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
9247 @code{glr-parser} directive.
9249 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
9250 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
9252 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
9253 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
9254 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
9255 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
9256 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
9257 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
9258 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
9259 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
9260 access the token names and codes.
9262 @node Java Semantic Values
9263 @subsection Java Semantic Values
9264 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
9266 @c - Printer and destructor
9268 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
9269 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
9270 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
9273 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
9274 %type <Integer> number
9277 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
9278 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
9279 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
9280 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
9281 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
9284 %define stype "ASTNode"
9288 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
9289 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
9291 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9292 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
9293 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
9294 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
9295 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
9296 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
9298 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
9299 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
9300 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
9302 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
9303 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
9304 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
9307 @node Java Location Values
9308 @subsection Java Location Values
9313 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser
9314 supports location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
9315 An auxiliary user-defined class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point
9316 in a file; Bison itself defines a class representing a @dfn{location},
9317 a range composed of a pair of positions (possibly spanning several
9318 files). The location class is an inner class of the parser; the name
9319 is @code{Location} by default, and may also be renamed using
9320 @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
9322 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
9323 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
9324 with @code{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
9325 be supplied by the user.
9328 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
9329 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
9330 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9333 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
9334 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9337 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
9338 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9341 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
9342 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
9343 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
9344 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
9348 @node Java Parser Interface
9349 @subsection Java Parser Interface
9350 @c - define parser_class_name
9352 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9354 @c - Reporting errors
9356 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
9357 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
9358 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
9359 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
9360 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
9362 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
9363 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
9364 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
9365 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
9366 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
9367 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
9369 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
9370 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
9371 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
9372 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
9374 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
9375 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
9376 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
9377 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
9378 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
9379 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
9381 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
9382 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
9384 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
9385 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
9386 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
9387 which initialize them automatically.
9389 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
9390 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
9392 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9393 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
9394 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
9398 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9399 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
9400 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
9402 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
9403 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
9404 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
9407 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
9408 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
9409 @code{false} otherwise.
9412 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
9413 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
9414 from a syntax error.
9415 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9418 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
9419 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
9420 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9424 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
9425 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
9426 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9427 or nonzero, full tracing.
9431 @node Java Scanner Interface
9432 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
9435 @c - Lexer interface
9437 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
9438 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
9439 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
9440 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
9442 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
9443 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
9444 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
9445 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
9448 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
9449 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
9450 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
9451 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
9454 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
9456 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
9457 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
9458 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
9459 changed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
9462 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
9463 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9464 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
9467 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
9468 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9471 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
9472 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
9473 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
9474 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
9475 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
9477 The return type can be changed using @code{%define position_type
9478 "@var{class-name}".}
9481 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
9482 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
9484 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
9485 "@var{class-name}".}
9489 @node Java Action Features
9490 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
9492 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
9493 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
9495 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
9496 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
9499 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9500 This may not be assigned to.
9501 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9504 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
9505 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
9506 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9510 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
9511 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
9512 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
9513 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
9514 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
9515 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9518 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
9519 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
9520 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
9521 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
9523 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9527 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9528 This may not be assigned to.
9529 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9533 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
9534 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9537 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
9538 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
9539 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9542 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
9543 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
9544 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9547 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
9548 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
9549 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9552 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
9553 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
9554 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
9556 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9559 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
9560 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
9561 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
9562 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
9567 @node Java Differences
9568 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9570 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
9571 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
9572 section summarizes these differences.
9576 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
9577 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
9578 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
9579 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
9580 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
9581 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
9582 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9584 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
9585 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
9586 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
9587 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
9588 corresponds to these C macros.}.
9591 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
9592 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
9593 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
9594 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
9595 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
9596 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
9597 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
9598 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
9599 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9602 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
9604 @item @code{%code imports}
9605 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
9606 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
9607 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
9609 @item unqualified @code{%code}
9610 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
9612 @item @code{%code lexer}
9613 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
9614 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
9615 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
9619 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
9620 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
9621 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
9623 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
9624 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
9629 @node Java Declarations Summary
9630 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
9632 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
9633 meaning when used in a Java parser.
9635 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
9636 Generate a Java class for the parser.
9639 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9640 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
9641 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
9642 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
9643 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9646 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9647 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
9648 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
9649 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9652 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9653 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
9654 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
9655 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9658 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
9659 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
9660 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9663 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
9664 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
9666 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9669 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9670 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
9671 @xref{Java Differences}.
9674 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9675 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
9676 @xref{Java Differences}.
9679 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9680 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
9681 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9684 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
9685 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
9686 @emph{outside} the parser class.
9687 @xref{Java Differences}.
9690 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
9691 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
9692 @xref{Java Differences}.
9695 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
9696 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
9697 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9700 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
9701 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
9702 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9705 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
9706 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
9707 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9710 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
9711 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
9713 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9716 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
9717 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
9718 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9719 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9722 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
9723 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
9724 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
9725 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
9726 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9729 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
9730 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
9731 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9734 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
9735 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
9736 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
9737 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9740 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
9741 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
9742 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
9743 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9746 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
9747 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
9748 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9751 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
9752 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
9753 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9756 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
9757 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
9758 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9761 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
9762 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
9763 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
9764 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9768 @c ================================================= FAQ
9771 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
9772 @cindex frequently asked questions
9775 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
9779 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
9780 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
9781 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
9782 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
9783 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
9784 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
9785 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
9786 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
9787 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
9788 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
9789 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
9790 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
9793 @node Memory Exhausted
9794 @section Memory Exhausted
9797 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
9798 message. What can I do?
9801 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
9804 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
9805 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
9807 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
9808 following typical questions:
9811 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
9812 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
9813 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
9820 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
9821 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
9822 although I did specify @code{%define api.pure}.
9825 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
9826 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
9827 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
9828 demonstration, consider the following source file,
9829 @file{first-line.l}:
9837 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
9840 yyparse (char const *file)
9842 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
9845 /* One token only. */
9847 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
9862 If the file @file{input} contains
9870 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
9873 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
9874 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
9875 $ @kbd{./first-line}
9880 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
9881 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
9882 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
9883 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
9884 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
9885 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
9886 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
9887 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
9890 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
9891 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
9892 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
9893 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
9895 @node Strings are Destroyed
9896 @section Strings are Destroyed
9899 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
9900 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
9901 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
9904 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
9905 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
9906 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
9911 char *yylval = NULL;
9914 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
9920 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
9921 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
9922 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
9923 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
9928 If you compile and run this code, you get:
9931 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
9932 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
9933 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
9939 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
9940 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
9941 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
9942 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
9943 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
9944 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
9947 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
9948 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
9949 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
9954 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
9955 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
9958 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
9959 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
9962 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
9963 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
9964 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
9965 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
9966 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
9967 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
9968 execute simple instructions one after the others.
9970 @cindex abstract syntax tree
9972 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
9973 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
9974 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
9975 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
9976 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
9977 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
9980 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
9981 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
9984 @node Multiple start-symbols
9985 @section Multiple start-symbols
9988 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
9989 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
9990 multiple entry points.
9993 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
9994 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
9995 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
9996 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10000 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
10002 start: START_FOO foo
10006 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10007 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10009 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10010 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10011 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10012 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10013 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10014 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10015 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10016 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10019 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10024 int t = start_token;
10029 /* @r{The rules.} */
10033 @node Secure? Conform?
10034 @section Secure? Conform?
10037 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10040 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10041 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10042 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10043 please send us a bug report.
10045 @node I can't build Bison
10046 @section I can't build Bison
10049 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10050 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10054 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10055 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10056 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10057 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10058 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10059 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10060 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10063 @node Where can I find help?
10064 @section Where can I find help?
10067 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10070 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10071 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10072 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10073 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10074 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10075 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10076 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10077 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10081 @section Bug Reports
10084 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10087 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10088 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10089 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10090 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10091 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10093 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10094 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10095 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10096 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10097 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10099 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10100 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10101 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10102 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10103 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10104 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10106 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10107 send a bug report just because you can not provide a fix.
10109 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10111 @node More Languages
10112 @section More Languages
10115 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10116 favorite language here}?
10119 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10120 languages; contributions are welcome.
10123 @section Beta Testing
10126 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10129 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10130 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10131 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10132 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10133 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10134 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10135 essentially halted.
10137 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10138 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10139 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10140 systems are especially welcome.
10142 @node Mailing Lists
10143 @section Mailing Lists
10146 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10149 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10151 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10153 @node Table of Symbols
10154 @appendix Bison Symbols
10155 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
10156 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10158 @deffn {Variable} @@$
10159 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10160 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10163 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10164 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand
10165 side of the rule. @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10168 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
10169 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name.
10170 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10173 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
10174 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name.
10175 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10178 @deffn {Variable} $$
10179 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
10183 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
10184 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
10185 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
10188 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
10189 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10193 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
10194 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10198 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
10199 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
10200 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
10201 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
10204 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
10205 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
10206 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
10207 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
10208 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
10212 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
10213 Comment delimiters, as in C.
10216 @deffn {Delimiter} :
10217 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
10221 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
10222 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10225 @deffn {Delimiter} |
10226 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
10227 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10230 @deffn {Directive} <*>
10231 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
10234 This feature is experimental.
10235 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10238 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10241 @deffn {Directive} <>
10242 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
10245 This feature is experimental.
10246 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10249 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10252 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
10253 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
10254 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
10255 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
10258 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
10259 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
10260 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
10261 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
10262 @xref{%code Summary}.
10265 @deffn {Directive} %debug
10266 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10270 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
10271 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10272 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10277 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{define-variable}
10278 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} @var{value}
10279 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} "@var{value}"
10280 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
10283 @deffn {Directive} %defines
10284 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
10285 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10288 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
10289 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
10290 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10293 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
10294 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
10295 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10298 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
10299 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
10300 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
10304 @deffn {Symbol} $end
10305 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
10306 used in the grammar.
10309 @deffn {Symbol} error
10310 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
10311 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
10312 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
10313 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
10314 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
10315 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
10316 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
10317 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10320 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
10321 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
10322 when @code{yyerror} is called.
10325 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10326 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
10330 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
10331 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
10332 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10335 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
10336 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
10339 @deffn {Directive} %language
10340 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
10341 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10344 @deffn {Directive} %left
10345 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
10346 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10349 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10350 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10351 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
10355 @deffn {Directive} %merge
10356 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
10357 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
10358 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
10359 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10362 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10363 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10367 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
10368 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10369 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10374 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
10375 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
10376 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10379 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
10380 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
10381 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10384 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
10385 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
10386 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10389 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10390 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10391 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
10392 Function @code{yyparse}}.
10395 @deffn {Directive} %prec
10396 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
10397 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
10400 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
10401 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
10402 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
10403 unreasonable usage.
10406 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
10407 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
10408 Require a Version of Bison}.
10411 @deffn {Directive} %right
10412 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
10413 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10416 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
10417 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
10418 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10421 @deffn {Directive} %start
10422 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
10426 @deffn {Directive} %token
10427 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
10428 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
10431 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
10432 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
10433 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10436 @deffn {Directive} %type
10437 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
10438 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
10441 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
10442 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
10443 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
10447 @deffn {Directive} %union
10448 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
10449 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
10452 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
10453 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
10454 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
10455 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
10456 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10458 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
10462 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
10463 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
10464 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
10465 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10467 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
10471 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
10472 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
10473 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10476 @deffn {Variable} yychar
10477 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
10478 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
10479 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
10480 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10483 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
10484 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
10485 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10488 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
10489 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
10490 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10493 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
10494 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
10495 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
10496 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10499 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
10500 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
10501 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10504 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
10505 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
10506 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
10507 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
10508 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10510 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
10514 @deffn {Function} yyerror
10515 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
10516 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
10517 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10520 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
10521 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
10522 to request verbose, specific error message strings
10523 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
10524 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
10525 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred.
10528 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
10529 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
10530 @xref{Memory Management}.
10533 @deffn {Function} yylex
10534 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
10535 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
10539 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
10540 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
10541 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
10542 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
10543 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10546 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
10547 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
10548 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10549 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10551 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
10553 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
10554 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
10555 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
10558 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
10559 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
10560 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
10563 @deffn {Variable} yylval
10564 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
10565 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10566 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10568 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
10569 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
10570 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
10573 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
10574 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
10578 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
10579 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
10580 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
10581 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
10582 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10585 @deffn {Function} yyparse
10586 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
10587 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10590 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
10591 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10592 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
10593 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
10594 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
10595 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10596 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10599 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
10600 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10601 call this function to create a new parser.
10602 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
10603 @code{yypstate_new}}.
10604 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10605 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10608 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
10609 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10610 parse the rest of the input stream.
10611 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
10612 @code{yypull_parse}}.
10613 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10614 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10617 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
10618 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10619 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
10620 @code{yypush_parse}}.
10621 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10622 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10625 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
10626 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
10627 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
10628 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
10629 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10632 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
10633 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
10634 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
10635 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10638 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
10639 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
10640 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
10641 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
10642 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
10643 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
10644 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
10646 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
10647 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
10648 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
10649 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
10650 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
10651 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
10652 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
10655 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
10656 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
10657 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
10665 @item Accepting State
10666 A state whose only action is the accept action.
10667 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
10668 @xref{Understanding,,}.
10670 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
10671 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
10672 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
10673 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
10674 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10676 @item Consistent State
10677 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{%define
10678 Summary,,lr.default-reductions}.
10680 @item Context-free grammars
10681 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
10682 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
10683 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
10684 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
10687 @item Default Reduction
10688 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
10689 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
10690 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to
10691 be the default reduction and removes that lookahead set.
10692 @xref{%define Summary,,lr.default-reductions}.
10694 @item Dynamic allocation
10695 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
10696 compile time or on entry to a function.
10699 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
10700 character string of length zero.
10702 @item Finite-state stack machine
10703 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
10704 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
10705 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
10706 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
10707 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
10708 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10710 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
10711 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
10712 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
10713 deterministic parsing
10714 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
10715 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
10716 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
10720 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
10721 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
10722 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10725 A minimal LR(1) parser table generation algorithm. That is, given any
10726 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
10727 language recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
10728 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states
10729 is often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical
10730 LR(1)'s extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the
10731 case of non-LR(1) grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is
10732 often an order of magnitude less as well. This can significantly
10733 reduce the complexity of developing of a grammar. @xref{%define
10736 @item Infix operator
10737 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
10738 performs some operation.
10741 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
10743 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
10744 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
10745 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions,
10746 and the use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection
10747 results in unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery
10748 in the wrong syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected
10749 tokens in a verbose syntax error message. @xref{%define
10750 Summary,,parse.lac}.
10752 @item Language construct
10753 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
10754 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
10755 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10757 @item Left associativity
10758 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
10759 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
10760 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
10762 @item Left recursion
10763 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
10764 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10767 @item Left-to-right parsing
10768 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
10769 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10771 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
10772 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
10773 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
10775 @item Lexical tie-in
10776 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
10777 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
10779 @item Literal string token
10780 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
10782 @item Lookahead token
10783 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
10787 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
10788 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
10789 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}.
10792 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
10793 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
10795 @item Nonterminal symbol
10796 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
10797 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
10798 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
10801 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
10802 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
10805 @item Postfix operator
10806 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
10807 performs some operation.
10810 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
10811 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
10815 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
10816 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
10817 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
10819 @item Reverse polish notation
10820 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
10822 @item Right recursion
10823 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
10824 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10828 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
10829 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
10830 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
10833 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
10834 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
10835 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10837 @item Single-character literal
10838 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
10839 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
10842 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
10843 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
10844 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
10845 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
10848 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
10849 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
10850 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
10853 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
10854 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10857 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
10858 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
10859 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
10860 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
10862 @item Terminal symbol
10863 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
10864 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
10865 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10868 @node Copying This Manual
10869 @appendix Copying This Manual
10879 @c Local Variables:
10883 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
10884 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
10885 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
10886 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
10887 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
10888 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
10889 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
10890 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
10891 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
10892 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
10893 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
10894 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
10895 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
10896 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum
10897 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
10898 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
10899 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
10900 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
10901 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
10902 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
10903 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
10904 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
10905 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
10906 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead
10907 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
10908 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
10909 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
10910 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
10911 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
10912 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
10913 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs
10914 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC
10915 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
10916 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative
10917 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
10918 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
10919 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
10920 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz
10921 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
10922 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno
10923 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
10924 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
10925 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
10926 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
10927 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc
10928 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
10929 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
10930 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
10931 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
10932 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
10933 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett
10934 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity