1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2013 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
190 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
191 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
192 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
193 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
195 Outline of a Bison Grammar
197 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
198 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
199 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
200 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
201 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
205 * Rules Syntax:: Syntax of the rules.
206 * Empty Rules:: Symbols that can match the empty string.
207 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
210 Defining Language Semantics
212 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
213 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
214 * Type Generation:: Generating the semantic value type.
215 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
216 * Structured Value Type:: Providing a structured semantic value type.
217 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
218 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
219 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
220 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
221 action in the middle of a rule.
225 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
226 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
227 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
231 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
232 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
233 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
237 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
238 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
239 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
240 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
241 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
242 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
243 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
244 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
245 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
246 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
247 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
248 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
249 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
250 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
252 Parser C-Language Interface
254 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
255 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
256 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
257 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
258 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
259 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
261 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
262 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
263 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
266 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
268 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
269 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
270 of the token it has read.
271 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
272 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
274 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
275 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
277 The Bison Parser Algorithm
279 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
280 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
281 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
282 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
283 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
284 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
285 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
286 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
287 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
288 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
292 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
293 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
294 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
295 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
296 * How Precedence:: How they work.
297 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
301 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
302 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
303 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
304 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
306 Handling Context Dependencies
308 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
309 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
310 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
311 error recovery rules must be written.
313 Debugging Your Parser
315 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
316 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
317 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
318 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
322 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
323 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
324 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
328 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
329 in alphabetical order by short options.
330 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
331 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
333 Parsers Written In Other Languages
335 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
336 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
340 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
341 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
342 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
343 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
344 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
345 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
349 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
350 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
351 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
353 A Complete C++ Example
355 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
356 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
357 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
358 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
359 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
363 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
364 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
365 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
366 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
367 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
368 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
369 * Java Push Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the a push parser
370 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
371 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
373 Frequently Asked Questions
375 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
376 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
377 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
378 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
379 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
380 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
381 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
382 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
383 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
384 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
385 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
386 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
390 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
396 @unnumbered Introduction
399 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
400 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
401 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
402 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
403 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
404 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
405 calculators to complex programming languages.
407 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
408 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
409 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
410 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
411 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
414 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
415 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
416 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
417 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
420 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
421 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
422 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
423 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
424 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
425 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
428 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
431 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
433 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
434 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
435 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
436 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
437 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
439 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
441 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
442 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
443 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
444 License to all of the Bison source code.
446 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
447 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
448 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
449 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
450 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
451 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
452 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
454 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
455 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
456 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
457 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
458 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
459 using the other GNU tools.
461 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
462 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
463 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
464 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
468 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
469 @include gpl-3.0.texi
472 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
474 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
475 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
476 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
479 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
480 as mathematical ideas.
481 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
482 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
483 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
484 the name of an identifier, etc.).
485 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
486 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
487 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
488 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
489 how is the output used?
490 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
491 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
494 @node Language and Grammar
495 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
497 @cindex context-free grammar
498 @cindex grammar, context-free
499 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
500 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
501 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
502 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
503 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
504 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
505 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
506 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
510 @cindex Backus-Naur form
511 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
512 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
513 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
514 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
515 essentially machine-readable BNF.
517 @cindex LALR grammars
518 @cindex IELR grammars
520 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
521 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
522 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
523 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
524 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
525 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
526 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
527 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
528 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
529 Construction}, to learn how.
532 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
533 @cindex ambiguous grammars
534 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
536 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
537 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
538 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
539 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
540 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
541 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
542 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
543 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
544 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
545 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
546 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
547 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
548 possible parses of any given string is finite.
550 @cindex symbols (abstract)
552 @cindex syntactic grouping
553 @cindex grouping, syntactic
554 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
555 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
556 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
557 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
558 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
559 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
560 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
562 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
563 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
564 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
565 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
566 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
567 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
568 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
569 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
570 lexicography, not grammar.)
572 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
575 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
576 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
577 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
578 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
579 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
580 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
581 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
584 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
585 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
586 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
587 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
588 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
589 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
590 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
591 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
593 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
594 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
595 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
596 reads informally as follows:
599 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
604 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
608 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
609 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
610 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
611 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
614 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
615 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
616 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
617 not the start symbol.
619 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
620 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
621 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
622 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
623 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
624 reports a syntax error.
626 @node Grammar in Bison
627 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
628 @cindex Bison grammar
629 @cindex grammar, Bison
630 @cindex formal grammar
632 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
633 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
634 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
636 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
637 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
638 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
640 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
641 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
642 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
643 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
644 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
645 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
646 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
649 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
650 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
651 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
652 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
654 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
655 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
657 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
658 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
659 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
660 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
664 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
668 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
670 @node Semantic Values
671 @section Semantic Values
672 @cindex semantic value
673 @cindex value, semantic
675 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
676 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
677 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
678 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
679 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
682 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
683 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
684 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
685 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
686 ,Defining Language Semantics},
689 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
690 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
691 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
692 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
695 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
696 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
697 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
698 need to have any semantic value.)
700 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
701 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
702 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
703 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
704 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
705 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
707 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
708 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
709 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
710 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
711 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
713 @node Semantic Actions
714 @section Semantic Actions
715 @cindex semantic actions
716 @cindex actions, semantic
718 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
719 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
720 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
721 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
724 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
725 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
726 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
727 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
728 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
729 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
730 newly recognized larger expression.
732 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
736 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
740 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
741 from the values of the two subexpressions.
744 @section Writing GLR Parsers
746 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
749 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
750 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
752 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
753 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
754 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
755 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
756 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
757 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
758 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
759 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
760 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
762 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
763 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
764 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
765 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
766 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
767 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
768 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
769 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
770 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
771 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
772 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
773 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
774 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
775 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
776 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
777 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
778 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
779 identical set of symbols.
781 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
782 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
783 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
784 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
785 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
786 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
787 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
788 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
789 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
793 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
794 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
795 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
796 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
797 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
800 @node Simple GLR Parsers
801 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
802 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
803 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
807 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
808 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
810 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
811 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
812 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
814 Consider a problem that
815 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
816 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
819 type subrange = lo .. hi;
820 type enum = (a, b, c);
824 The original language standard allows only numeric
825 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
826 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
827 10206) and many other
828 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
829 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
833 type subrange = (a) .. b;
837 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
838 type with only one value:
845 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
846 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
848 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
849 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
850 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
851 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
852 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
853 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
854 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
855 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
857 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
858 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
859 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
860 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
863 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
864 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
865 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
866 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
867 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
868 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
871 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
872 use the GLR algorithm.
873 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
874 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
875 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
876 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
877 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
878 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
879 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
880 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
881 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
883 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
884 reports a syntax error as usual.
886 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
887 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
888 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
889 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
890 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
892 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
893 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
894 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
895 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
896 The present example contains only one conflict between two
897 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
898 cannot be nested. So the number of
899 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
900 and the parsing time is still linear.
902 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
903 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
906 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
914 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
942 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
943 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
944 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
945 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
952 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
953 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
954 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
963 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
964 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
965 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
966 notice when the parser splits.
968 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
969 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
970 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
971 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
972 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
973 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
974 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
975 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
976 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
977 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
978 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
979 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
980 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
983 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
984 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
985 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
986 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
987 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
988 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
990 @node Merging GLR Parses
991 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
992 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
993 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
997 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
999 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
1004 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1006 void yyerror (char const *);
1020 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1029 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1030 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1031 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1032 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1033 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1037 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1038 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1039 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1040 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1044 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1045 | '(' declarator ')'
1050 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1051 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1058 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1059 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1060 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1061 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1062 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1063 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1064 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1065 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1066 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1067 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1068 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1069 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1070 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1071 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1073 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1074 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1075 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1076 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1077 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1078 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1079 The parser therefore prints
1082 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1085 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1086 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1093 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1094 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1095 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1096 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1097 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1098 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1099 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1100 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1101 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1102 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1108 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1109 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1110 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1111 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1116 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1117 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1122 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1126 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1134 with an accompanying forward declaration
1135 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1139 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1140 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1145 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1146 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1149 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1152 Bison requires that all of the
1153 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1154 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1155 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1156 the offending merge.
1158 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1159 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1161 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1162 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1164 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1165 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1166 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1167 the associated reduction.
1168 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1169 action in a GLR parser.
1172 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1174 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1176 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1177 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1178 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1179 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1180 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1181 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1182 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1183 influence syntax analysis.
1184 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1187 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1188 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1189 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1190 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1191 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1192 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1193 future versions of Bison.
1194 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1195 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1196 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1198 @subsubsection YYERROR
1200 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1201 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1202 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1203 initiate error recovery.
1204 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1205 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1206 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1207 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1208 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1209 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1210 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1211 the parse that invoked the test.
1213 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1214 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1215 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1218 @node Semantic Predicates
1219 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1221 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1223 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1225 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1226 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1227 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1228 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1232 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1233 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1238 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1239 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1240 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1241 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1242 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1243 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1244 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1246 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1247 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1248 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1249 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1252 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1253 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1254 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1258 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1259 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1260 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1261 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1266 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1267 false). However, this
1268 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1269 have overlapping syntax.
1270 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1271 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1272 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1273 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1276 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1277 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1279 @node Compiler Requirements
1280 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1281 @cindex @code{inline}
1282 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1284 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1285 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1286 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1287 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1288 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1289 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1298 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1302 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1303 && ! defined inline)
1312 @cindex textual location
1313 @cindex location, textual
1315 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1316 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1317 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1318 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1320 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1321 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1322 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1323 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1326 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1327 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1328 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1331 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1332 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1333 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1334 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1335 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1336 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1337 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1340 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1341 @cindex Bison parser
1342 @cindex Bison utility
1343 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1346 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1347 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1348 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1349 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1350 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1351 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1352 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1355 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1356 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1357 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1360 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1361 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1362 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1363 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1364 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1365 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1366 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1368 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1369 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1370 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1371 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1372 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1373 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1374 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1375 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1376 C-Language Interface}.
1378 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1379 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1380 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1381 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1382 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1383 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1384 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1385 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1386 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1387 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1388 anything other than their usual meanings.
1390 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1391 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1392 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1393 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1394 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1395 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1396 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1397 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1398 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1401 @section Stages in Using Bison
1402 @cindex stages in using Bison
1405 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1406 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1410 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1411 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1412 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1413 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1414 sequence of C statements.
1417 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1418 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1419 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1420 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1423 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1426 Write error-reporting routines.
1429 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1430 must follow these steps:
1434 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1437 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1440 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1443 @node Grammar Layout
1444 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1445 @cindex grammar file
1447 @cindex format of grammar file
1448 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1450 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1451 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1458 @var{Bison declarations}
1467 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1468 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1470 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1471 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1472 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1473 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1474 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1475 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1477 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1478 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1479 semantic values of various symbols.
1481 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1484 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1485 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1486 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1490 @cindex simple examples
1491 @cindex examples, simple
1493 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1494 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1495 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1496 and a multi-function calculator. All
1497 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1499 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1500 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1501 source file to try them.
1504 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1505 a first example with no operator precedence.
1506 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1507 Operator precedence is introduced.
1508 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1509 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1510 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1511 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1512 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1516 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1517 @cindex reverse polish notation
1518 @cindex polish notation calculator
1519 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1520 @cindex calculator, simple
1522 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1523 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1524 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1525 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1527 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1528 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1531 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1532 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1533 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1534 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1535 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1536 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1537 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1540 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1541 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1543 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1544 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1546 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1548 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1555 void yyerror (char const *);
1559 %define api.value.type @{double@}
1562 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1565 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1566 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1568 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1569 function @code{pow}.
1571 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1572 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1573 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1574 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1577 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison about
1578 the tokens and their types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1579 Declarations Section}).
1581 The @code{%define} directive defines the variable @code{api.value.type},
1582 thus specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1583 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The Bison
1584 parser will use whatever type @code{api.value.type} is defined as; if you
1585 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1586 @samp{@{double@}}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1587 which is a floating point number. C code can use @code{YYSTYPE} to refer to
1588 the value @code{api.value.type}.
1590 Each terminal symbol that is not a single-character literal must be
1591 declared. (Single-character literals normally don't need to be declared.)
1592 In this example, all the arithmetic operators are designated by
1593 single-character literals, so the only terminal symbol that needs to be
1594 declared is @code{NUM}, the token type for numeric constants.
1597 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1599 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1601 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1613 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1620 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1621 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1622 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1623 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1624 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1625 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1631 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1632 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1633 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1634 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1635 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1638 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1639 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1640 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1642 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1643 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1644 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1645 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1646 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1647 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1650 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1651 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1652 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1656 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1658 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1667 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1668 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1669 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1670 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1671 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1673 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1674 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1675 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1676 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1677 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and to use the
1678 (optional) @code{%empty} directive, or to write the comment @samp{/* empty
1679 */} in it (@pxref{Empty Rules}).
1681 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1682 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1683 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1684 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1687 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1688 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1689 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1692 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1694 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1699 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1703 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1704 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1705 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1706 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1707 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1708 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1709 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1711 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1712 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1713 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1714 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1715 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1718 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1720 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1721 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1722 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1723 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1728 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1729 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1734 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1735 equally well have written them separately:
1739 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1740 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1744 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1745 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1746 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1747 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1748 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1749 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1750 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1751 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1753 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1754 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1755 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1757 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1758 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1762 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1766 means the same thing as this:
1771 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1777 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1780 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1781 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1782 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1784 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1785 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1786 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1787 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1789 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1791 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1792 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1793 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1794 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1796 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1797 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1798 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1799 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1800 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1801 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1802 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1803 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1804 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1806 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1807 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1808 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, whose value
1809 was defined at the beginning of the grammar via @samp{%define api.value.type
1810 @{double@}}; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1812 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1813 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1815 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1817 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1820 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1821 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1822 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1823 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1834 /* Skip white space. */
1835 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1839 /* Process numbers. */
1840 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1843 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1848 /* Return end-of-input. */
1851 /* Return a single char. */
1858 @subsection The Controlling Function
1859 @cindex controlling function
1860 @cindex main function in simple example
1862 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1863 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1864 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1866 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1878 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1879 @cindex error reporting routine
1881 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1882 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1883 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1884 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1885 here is the definition we will use:
1887 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1892 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1894 yyerror (char const *s)
1896 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1901 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1902 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1903 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1904 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1905 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1906 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1908 @node Rpcalc Generate
1909 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1910 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1912 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1913 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1914 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1915 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1916 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1917 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1919 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1920 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1922 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1923 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1930 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1931 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1932 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1933 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1934 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1935 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1936 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1938 @node Rpcalc Compile
1939 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1940 @cindex compiling the parser
1942 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1946 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1948 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1952 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1953 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1954 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1958 # @r{List files again.}
1960 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1964 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1965 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1971 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1973 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1976 @result{} -3.166666667
1977 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1979 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1984 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1985 @cindex infix notation calculator
1987 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1989 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1990 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1991 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1992 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1995 /* Infix notation calculator. */
2002 void yyerror (char const *);
2007 /* Bison declarations. */
2008 %define api.value.type @{double@}
2012 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2013 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2016 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2027 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2034 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2035 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2036 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2037 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2038 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2039 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2040 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2047 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2050 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2052 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2053 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2054 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2055 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2056 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2057 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2058 the associativity/precedence.)
2060 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2061 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2062 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2063 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2064 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2065 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2068 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2069 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2070 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2071 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2072 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2074 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2079 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2087 @node Simple Error Recovery
2088 @section Simple Error Recovery
2089 @cindex error recovery, simple
2091 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2092 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2093 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2094 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2095 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2096 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2098 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2099 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2100 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2106 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2107 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2112 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2113 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2114 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2115 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2116 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2117 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2118 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2119 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2122 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2123 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2124 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2125 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2126 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2127 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2130 @node Location Tracking Calc
2131 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2132 @cindex location tracking calculator
2133 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2134 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2136 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2137 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2138 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2139 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2143 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2144 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2145 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2148 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2149 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2151 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2152 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2155 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2160 void yyerror (char const *);
2163 /* Bison declarations. */
2164 %define api.value.type @{int@}
2172 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2176 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2177 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2178 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2179 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2180 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2181 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2182 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2186 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2188 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2189 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2190 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2191 from the new information.
2193 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2194 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2207 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2214 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2215 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2216 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2226 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2227 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2228 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2233 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2234 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2235 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2239 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2240 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2241 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2243 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2244 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2245 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2246 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2247 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2248 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2252 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2254 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2255 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2256 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2259 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2260 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2271 /* Skip white space. */
2272 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2273 ++yylloc.last_column;
2278 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2279 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2283 /* Process numbers. */
2287 ++yylloc.last_column;
2288 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2290 ++yylloc.last_column;
2291 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2298 /* Return end-of-input. */
2303 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2307 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2310 ++yylloc.last_column;
2316 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2317 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2318 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2319 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2321 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2322 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2323 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2324 controlling function:
2331 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2332 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2338 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2339 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2340 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2342 @node Multi-function Calc
2343 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2344 @cindex multi-function calculator
2345 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2346 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2348 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2349 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2350 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2351 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2352 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2354 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2355 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2356 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2357 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2358 functions whose syntax has this form:
2361 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2365 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2366 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2367 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2372 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2373 @result{} 3.1415926536
2377 @result{} 0.0000000000
2379 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2380 @result{} 2.3000000000
2382 @result{} 2.3000000000
2384 @result{} 0.8329091229
2385 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2386 @result{} 2.3000000000
2390 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2393 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2394 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2395 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2396 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2397 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2400 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2401 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2403 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2405 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2409 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2410 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2411 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of 'symrec'. */
2413 void yyerror (char const *);
2417 %define api.value.type union /* Generate YYSTYPE from these types: */
2418 %token <double> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2419 %token <symrec*> VAR FNCT /* Symbol table pointer: variable and function. */
2426 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2427 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2431 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2432 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2433 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2435 The special @code{union} value assigned to the @code{%define} variable
2436 @code{api.value.type} specifies that the symbols are defined with their data
2437 types. Bison will generate an appropriate definition of @code{YYSTYPE} to
2440 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a type
2441 with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols are
2442 @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their declarations are
2443 augmented with their data type (placed between angle brackets). For
2444 instance, values of @code{NUM} are stored in @code{double}.
2446 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal symbols,
2447 just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. Previously we did
2448 not use @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are normally
2449 declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But @code{exp} must be
2450 declared explicitly so we can specify its value type. @xref{Type Decl,
2451 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2454 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2456 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2457 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2458 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2460 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2462 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2473 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2474 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2481 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2482 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2483 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2484 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2485 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2486 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2487 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2488 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2489 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2490 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2493 /* End of grammar. */
2497 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2498 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2499 @cindex symbol table example
2501 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2502 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2503 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2504 requires some additional C functions for support.
2506 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2507 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2508 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2510 @comment file: calc.h
2513 /* Function type. */
2514 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2518 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2521 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2522 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2525 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2526 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2528 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2533 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2535 /* The symbol table: a chain of 'struct symrec'. */
2536 extern symrec *sym_table;
2538 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2539 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2543 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2546 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2552 double (*fnct) (double);
2557 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2570 /* The symbol table: a chain of 'struct symrec'. */
2575 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2581 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2583 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2584 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2590 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2591 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2593 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2594 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2595 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2596 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2597 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2598 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2600 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2602 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2603 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2607 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2609 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2610 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2611 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2612 ptr->type = sym_type;
2613 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2614 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2622 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2625 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2626 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2627 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2635 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2637 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2638 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2639 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2640 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2642 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2643 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2644 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2645 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2646 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2647 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2649 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2650 operators in @code{yylex}.
2652 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2662 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2663 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2671 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2672 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2675 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.NUM);
2682 Bison generated a definition of @code{YYSTYPE} with a member named
2683 @code{NUM} to store value of @code{NUM} symbols.
2685 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2688 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2691 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2692 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2693 static size_t length = 40;
2694 static char *symbuf = 0;
2699 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2705 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2709 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2711 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2713 /* Get another character. */
2718 while (isalnum (c));
2725 s = getsym (symbuf);
2727 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2728 *((symrec**) &yylval) = s;
2732 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2739 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2741 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2742 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2743 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2745 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2748 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2750 yyerror (char const *s)
2752 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2758 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2761 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2762 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2763 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2771 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2772 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2773 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2781 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2784 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2785 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2786 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2789 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2790 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2794 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2796 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2797 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2799 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2800 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2803 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2804 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2805 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2806 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2807 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2808 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2809 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2810 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2813 @node Grammar Outline
2814 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2817 @findex /* @dots{} */
2819 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2820 appropriate delimiters:
2827 @var{Bison declarations}
2836 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2837 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that continues until end
2841 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2842 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2843 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2844 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2845 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2849 @subsection The prologue
2850 @cindex declarations section
2852 @cindex declarations
2854 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2855 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2856 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2857 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2858 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2859 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2860 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2862 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2863 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2866 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2867 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2868 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2869 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2870 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2871 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2872 @code{%union} declaration.
2886 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2892 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2893 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2900 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2901 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2902 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2903 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2904 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2905 @code{#include} directives.
2907 @node Prologue Alternatives
2908 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2909 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2912 @findex %code requires
2913 @findex %code provides
2916 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2917 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2918 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2919 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2920 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2921 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2922 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2924 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2938 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2944 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2945 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2953 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2954 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2955 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2956 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2957 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2958 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2959 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2960 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2961 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2962 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2963 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2965 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2966 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2967 This behavior raises a few questions.
2968 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2969 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2970 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2971 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2972 This behavior is not intuitive.
2974 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2975 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2976 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2977 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2984 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2985 * in a '%code requires'; see below. */
2988 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2989 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3002 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3008 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3009 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3010 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3018 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
3019 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
3020 explicit which kind you intend.
3021 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
3023 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
3024 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
3025 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
3026 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
3027 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
3028 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
3029 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
3030 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
3031 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
3034 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
3035 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
3037 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3055 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3061 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3062 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3075 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3076 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3077 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3085 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3086 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3087 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3088 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3089 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3090 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3092 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3093 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3094 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3095 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3096 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3097 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3098 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3099 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3100 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3101 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3102 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3105 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3106 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3107 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3108 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3109 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3110 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3111 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3112 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3113 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3114 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3132 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3138 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3139 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3152 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3158 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3159 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3167 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3168 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3169 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3172 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3173 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3174 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3175 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3176 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3177 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3180 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3181 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3182 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3183 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3185 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3186 organize your grammar file.
3187 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3192 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3193 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3194 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3195 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3199 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3200 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3201 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3202 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3207 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3208 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3210 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3212 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3213 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3214 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3215 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3217 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3218 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3219 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3220 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3221 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3222 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3223 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3224 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3227 @node Bison Declarations
3228 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3229 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3230 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3232 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3233 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3234 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3235 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3238 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3239 @cindex grammar rules section
3240 @cindex rules section for grammar
3242 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3243 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3245 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3246 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3247 if it is the first thing in the file.
3250 @subsection The epilogue
3251 @cindex additional C code section
3253 @cindex C code, section for additional
3255 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3256 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3257 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3258 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3259 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3260 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3261 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3262 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3263 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3264 C-Language Interface}.
3266 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3267 from the grammar rules.
3269 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3270 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3271 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3272 of the grammar file.
3275 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3276 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3277 @cindex terminal symbol
3281 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3284 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3285 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3286 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3287 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3288 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3289 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3290 the symbol to stand for it.
3292 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3293 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3294 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3296 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3297 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3298 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3299 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3300 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3301 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3302 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3304 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3308 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3309 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3310 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3311 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3314 @cindex character token
3315 @cindex literal token
3316 @cindex single-character literal
3317 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3318 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3319 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3320 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3321 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3322 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3323 ,Operator Precedence}).
3325 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3326 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3327 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3328 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3329 your program will confuse other readers.
3331 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3332 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3333 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3334 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3335 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3336 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3340 @cindex string token
3341 @cindex literal string token
3342 @cindex multicharacter literal
3343 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3344 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3345 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3346 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3347 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3349 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3350 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3351 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3352 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3353 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3355 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3357 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3358 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3359 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3360 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3361 read your program will be confused.
3363 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3364 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3365 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3366 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3367 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3368 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3371 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3372 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3373 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3375 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3376 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3377 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3378 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3379 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3380 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3381 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3382 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3383 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3384 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3385 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3386 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3388 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3389 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3390 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3391 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3392 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3394 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3395 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3396 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3397 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3398 characters in the following C-language string:
3401 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3404 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3405 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3406 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3407 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3408 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3409 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3410 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3411 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3412 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3413 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3416 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3417 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3418 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3419 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3420 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3423 @section Grammar Rules
3425 A Bison grammar is a list of rules.
3428 * Rules Syntax:: Syntax of the rules.
3429 * Empty Rules:: Symbols that can match the empty string.
3430 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
3434 @subsection Syntax of Grammar Rules
3436 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3437 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3439 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3442 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3446 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3447 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3448 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3457 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3458 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3460 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3461 extra white space as you wish.
3463 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3464 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3467 @{@var{C statements}@}
3472 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3473 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3474 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3475 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3476 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3477 compiler can check it.
3479 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3480 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3481 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3482 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3483 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3484 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3485 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3486 character constants.
3488 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3492 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3493 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3498 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3499 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3506 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3509 @subsection Empty Rules
3514 A rule is said to be @dfn{empty} if its right-hand side (@var{components})
3515 is empty. It means that @var{result} can match the empty string. For
3516 example, here is how to define an optional semicolon:
3519 semicolon.opt: | ";";
3523 It is easy not to see an empty rule, especially when @code{|} is used. The
3524 @code{%empty} directive allows to make explicit that a rule is empty on
3536 Flagging a non-empty rule with @code{%empty} is an error. If run with
3537 @option{-Wempty-rule}, @command{bison} will report empty rules without
3538 @code{%empty}. Using @code{%empty} enables this warning, unless
3539 @option{-Wno-empty-rule} was specified.
3541 The @code{%empty} directive is a Bison extension, it does not work with
3542 Yacc. To remain compatible with POSIX Yacc, it is customary to write a
3543 comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule with no components:
3556 @subsection Recursive Rules
3557 @cindex recursive rule
3558 @cindex rule, recursive
3560 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3561 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3562 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3563 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3564 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3575 @cindex left recursion
3576 @cindex right recursion
3578 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3579 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3580 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3592 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3593 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3594 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3595 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3596 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3597 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3598 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3601 @cindex mutual recursion
3602 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3603 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3604 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3613 | primary '+' primary
3626 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3630 @section Defining Language Semantics
3631 @cindex defining language semantics
3632 @cindex language semantics, defining
3634 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3635 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3636 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3638 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3639 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3640 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3641 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3644 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3645 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3646 * Type Generation:: Generating the semantic value type.
3647 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
3648 * Structured Value Type:: Providing a structured semantic value type.
3649 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3650 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3651 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3652 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3653 action in the middle of a rule.
3657 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3658 @cindex semantic value type
3659 @cindex value type, semantic
3660 @cindex data types of semantic values
3661 @cindex default data type
3663 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3664 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3665 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3666 Notation Calculator}).
3668 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3669 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3670 specify some other type, define the @code{%define} variable
3671 @code{api.value.type} like this:
3674 %define api.value.type @{double@}
3681 %define api.value.type @{struct semantic_type@}
3684 The value of @code{api.value.type} should be a type name that does not
3685 contain parentheses or square brackets.
3687 Alternatively, instead of relying of Bison's @code{%define} support, you may
3688 rely on the C/C++ preprocessor and define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like
3692 #define YYSTYPE double
3696 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3697 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}). If compatibility
3698 with POSIX Yacc matters to you, use this. Note however that Bison cannot
3699 know @code{YYSTYPE}'s value, not even whether it is defined, so there are
3700 services it cannot provide. Besides this works only for languages that have
3703 @node Multiple Types
3704 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3706 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3707 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3708 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3709 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3712 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3713 requires you to do two things:
3717 Specify the entire collection of possible data types. There are several
3721 let Bison compute the union type from the tags you assign to symbols;
3724 use the @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union
3728 define the @code{%define} variable @code{api.value.type} to be a union type
3729 whose members are the type tags (@pxref{Structured Value Type,, Providing a
3730 Structured Semantic Value Type});
3733 use a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a
3734 union type whose member names are the type tags.
3738 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3739 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3740 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3741 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3742 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3745 @node Type Generation
3746 @subsection Generating the Semantic Value Type
3747 @cindex declaring value types
3748 @cindex value types, declaring
3749 @findex %define api.value.type union
3751 The special value @code{union} of the @code{%define} variable
3752 @code{api.value.type} instructs Bison that the tags used with the
3753 @code{%token} and @code{%type} directives are genuine types, not names of
3754 members of @code{YYSTYPE}.
3759 %define api.value.type union
3760 %token <int> INT "integer"
3763 %token <char const *> ID "identifier"
3767 generates an appropriate value of @code{YYSTYPE} to support each symbol
3768 type. The name of the member of @code{YYSTYPE} for tokens than have a
3769 declared identifier @var{id} (such as @code{INT} and @code{ID} above, but
3770 not @code{'n'}) is @code{@var{id}}. The other symbols have unspecified
3771 names on which you should not depend; instead, relying on C casts to access
3772 the semantic value with the appropriate type:
3775 /* For an "integer". */
3779 /* For an 'n', also declared as int. */
3780 *((int*)&yylval) = 42;
3783 /* For an "identifier". */
3788 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.token.prefix} is defined
3789 (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}), then it is also used to prefix
3790 the union member names. For instance, with @samp{%define api.token.prefix
3794 /* For an "integer". */
3795 yylval.TOK_INT = 42;
3799 This Bison extension cannot work if @code{%yacc} (or
3800 @option{-y}/@option{--yacc}) is enabled, as POSIX mandates that Yacc
3801 generate tokens as macros (e.g., @samp{#define INT 258}, or @samp{#define
3804 This feature is new, and user feedback would be most welcome.
3806 A similar feature is provided for C++ that in addition overcomes C++
3807 limitations (that forbid non-trivial objects to be part of a @code{union}):
3808 @samp{%define api.value.type variant}, see @ref{C++ Variants}.
3811 @subsection The Union Declaration
3812 @cindex declaring value types
3813 @cindex value types, declaring
3816 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of possible
3817 data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is followed by
3818 braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a @code{union} in C@.
3832 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
3833 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
3834 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
3835 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3837 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the @code{%union}. For
3850 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
3851 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
3854 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple @code{%union}
3855 declarations; their contents are concatenated. However, only the first
3856 @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
3858 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
3859 a semicolon after the closing brace.
3861 @node Structured Value Type
3862 @subsection Providing a Structured Semantic Value Type
3863 @cindex declaring value types
3864 @cindex value types, declaring
3867 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
3868 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one @samp{<@var{type}>}
3869 tag. For example, you can put the following into a header file
3882 and then your grammar can use the following instead of @code{%union}:
3889 %define api.value.type @{union YYSTYPE@}
3895 Actually, you may also provide a @code{struct} rather that a @code{union},
3896 which may be handy if you want to track information for every symbol (such
3897 as preceding comments).
3899 The type you provide may even be structured and include pointers, in which
3900 case the type tags you provide may be composite, with @samp{.} and @samp{->}
3909 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3911 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3912 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3913 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3914 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3916 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3917 placed at any position in the rule;
3918 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3919 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3920 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3921 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3923 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3924 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3925 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3926 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3927 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3928 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3929 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3930 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3931 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3932 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3935 Here is a typical example:
3941 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3945 Or, in terms of named references:
3951 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3956 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3957 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3958 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3959 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3960 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3961 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3963 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3964 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3965 referred to as @code{$2}.
3967 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3968 references construct.
3970 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3971 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3972 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3973 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3974 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3977 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3980 @cindex default action
3981 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3982 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3983 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3984 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3985 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3986 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3988 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3989 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3990 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3991 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3992 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3997 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3998 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
4004 %empty @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
4009 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
4010 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
4011 definition of @code{foo}.
4014 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
4015 any, from a semantic action.
4016 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
4017 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4020 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
4021 @cindex action data types
4022 @cindex data types in actions
4024 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
4025 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
4027 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
4028 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
4029 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
4030 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
4031 in the rule. In this example,
4037 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
4042 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
4043 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
4044 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
4045 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
4047 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
4048 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
4049 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
4061 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
4062 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
4064 @node Mid-Rule Actions
4065 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
4066 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4067 @cindex mid-rule actions
4069 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
4070 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
4071 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
4074 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
4075 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
4076 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
4079 @node Using Mid-Rule Actions
4080 @subsubsection Using Mid-Rule Actions
4082 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
4083 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
4084 it is run before they are parsed.
4086 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
4087 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
4088 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
4089 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
4092 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
4093 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
4094 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
4095 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
4096 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
4097 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
4099 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
4100 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
4101 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
4102 at the end of the rule.
4104 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
4105 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
4106 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
4107 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
4108 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
4109 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
4116 $<context>$ = push_context ();
4117 declare_variable ($3);
4122 pop_context ($<context>5);
4128 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
4129 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
4130 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
4131 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
4132 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
4133 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
4136 Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the @samp{stmt} is
4137 component number 6. Named references can be used to improve the readability
4138 and maintainability (@pxref{Named References}):
4145 $<context>let = push_context ();
4146 declare_variable ($3);
4151 pop_context ($<context>let);
4156 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
4157 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
4158 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
4159 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
4160 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
4163 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
4164 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
4165 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
4166 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
4167 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
4169 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
4170 Discarded Symbols}).
4171 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
4172 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
4174 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
4175 declare a destructor for that symbol:
4180 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
4198 $let = push_context ();
4199 declare_variable ($3);
4206 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
4207 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
4208 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
4210 @node Mid-Rule Action Translation
4211 @subsubsection Mid-Rule Action Translation
4215 As hinted earlier, mid-rule actions are actually transformed into regular
4216 rules and actions. The various reports generated by Bison (textual,
4217 graphical, etc., see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser})
4218 reveal this translation, best explained by means of an example. The
4222 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f(); @};
4229 $@@1: %empty @{ a(); @};
4230 $@@2: %empty @{ c(); @};
4231 $@@3: %empty @{ d(); @};
4232 exp: $@@1 "b" $@@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f(); @};
4236 with new nonterminal symbols @code{$@@@var{n}}, where @var{n} is a number.
4238 A mid-rule action is expected to generate a value if it uses @code{$$}, or
4239 the (final) action uses @code{$@var{n}} where @var{n} denote the mid-rule
4240 action. In that case its nonterminal is rather named @code{@@@var{n}}:
4243 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4250 @@1: %empty @{ a(); @};
4251 @@2: %empty @{ $$ = c(); @};
4252 $@@3: %empty @{ d(); @};
4253 exp: @@1 "b" @@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f = $1; @}
4256 There are probably two errors in the above example: the first mid-rule
4257 action does not generate a value (it does not use @code{$$} although the
4258 final action uses it), and the value of the second one is not used (the
4259 final action does not use @code{$3}). Bison reports these errors when the
4260 @code{midrule-value} warnings are enabled (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
4264 $ bison -fcaret -Wmidrule-value mid.y
4266 mid.y:2.6-13: warning: unset value: $$
4267 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4271 mid.y:2.19-31: warning: unused value: $3
4272 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4278 @node Mid-Rule Conflicts
4279 @subsubsection Conflicts due to Mid-Rule Actions
4280 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
4281 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
4282 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
4283 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
4284 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
4290 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4291 | '@{' statements '@}'
4297 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
4302 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4303 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4306 | '@{' statements '@}'
4312 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
4313 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
4314 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
4315 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
4316 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
4317 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
4319 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
4320 actions into the two rules, like this:
4325 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4326 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4327 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4328 '@{' statements '@}'
4334 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
4335 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
4337 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
4338 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
4339 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
4344 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4345 declarations statements '@}'
4346 | '@{' statements '@}'
4352 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
4353 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
4355 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
4356 serves as a subroutine:
4361 %empty @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4367 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4368 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4374 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4375 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4378 @node Tracking Locations
4379 @section Tracking Locations
4381 @cindex textual location
4382 @cindex location, textual
4384 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4385 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4386 especially symbol locations.
4388 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4389 actions to take when rules are matched.
4392 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4393 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4394 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4398 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4399 @cindex data type of locations
4400 @cindex default location type
4402 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4403 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4405 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4406 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4407 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4408 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4412 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4421 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4422 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4423 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4424 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4425 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4427 @node Actions and Locations
4428 @subsection Actions and Locations
4429 @cindex location actions
4430 @cindex actions, location
4433 @vindex @@@var{name}
4434 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4436 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4437 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4439 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4440 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4441 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4442 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4443 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4446 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4447 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4448 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4449 references construct.
4451 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4459 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4460 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4461 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4462 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4468 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
4469 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4470 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4476 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4477 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4478 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4481 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4482 example above simply rewrites this way:
4495 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
4496 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4497 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4504 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4505 from a semantic action.
4506 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4507 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4509 @node Location Default Action
4510 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4511 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4512 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4514 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4515 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4516 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4517 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4518 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4519 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4520 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4521 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4524 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4525 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4527 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4528 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4529 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4530 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4531 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4532 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4533 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4534 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4535 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4536 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4538 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4542 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4546 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4547 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4548 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4549 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4553 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4554 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4555 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4556 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4563 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4564 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4565 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4567 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4571 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4572 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4575 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4576 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4577 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4578 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4581 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4582 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4583 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4584 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4587 @node Named References
4588 @section Named References
4589 @cindex named references
4591 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4592 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4593 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4594 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4595 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4596 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4598 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4599 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4600 used as named references. For example:
4604 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4605 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4610 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4614 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4615 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4620 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4626 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4629 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4632 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4637 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4638 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4639 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4642 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4643 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4648 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4649 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4650 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4653 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4654 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4660 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4661 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4664 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4665 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4669 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4670 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4671 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4672 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4673 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4674 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4675 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4677 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4681 @section Bison Declarations
4682 @cindex declarations, Bison
4683 @cindex Bison declarations
4685 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4686 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4689 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4690 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4691 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4692 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4694 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4695 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4696 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4697 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4700 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4701 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4702 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4703 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4704 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4705 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4706 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4707 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4708 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4709 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4710 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4711 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4712 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4713 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4717 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4718 @cindex version requirement
4719 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4722 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4723 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4727 %require "@var{version}"
4731 @subsection Token Type Names
4732 @cindex declaring token type names
4733 @cindex token type names, declaring
4734 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4737 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4743 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4744 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4745 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4747 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4748 @code{%precedence}, or
4749 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4750 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4753 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4754 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4755 following the token name:
4759 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4763 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4764 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4765 with each other or with normal characters.
4767 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4768 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4769 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4770 Than One Value Type}).
4776 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4780 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4784 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4785 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4786 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4793 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4794 equivalent literal string tokens:
4797 %token <operator> OR "||"
4798 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4803 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4804 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4805 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4806 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4807 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4808 the literal string instead of the token name.
4810 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4811 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4815 %token END 0 "end of file"
4818 @node Precedence Decl
4819 @subsection Operator Precedence
4820 @cindex precedence declarations
4821 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4822 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4824 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4825 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4826 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4827 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4828 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4829 operator precedence.
4831 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4832 @code{%token}: either
4835 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4842 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4845 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4846 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4847 all the @var{symbols}:
4851 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4852 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4853 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4854 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4855 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4856 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4857 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4858 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4859 considered a syntax error.
4861 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4862 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4863 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4866 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4867 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4868 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4869 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4870 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4873 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4874 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4875 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4876 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4881 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4882 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4886 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4887 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4888 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4892 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4893 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4894 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4897 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4901 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4902 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4903 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}). You
4904 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4905 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4908 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4909 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4910 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4911 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4913 @node Initial Action Decl
4914 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4915 @findex %initial-action
4917 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4918 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4921 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4922 @findex %initial-action
4923 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4924 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4925 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4926 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4929 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4932 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4935 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4940 @node Destructor Decl
4941 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4942 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4946 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4947 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4948 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4949 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4950 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4951 must discard the start symbol.
4953 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4954 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4955 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4956 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4958 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4959 symbol is automatically discarded.
4961 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4963 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4964 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4965 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4966 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4967 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4970 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4971 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4972 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4973 tag among @var{symbols}.
4974 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4975 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4976 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4978 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4979 (These default forms are experimental.
4980 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4982 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4983 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4984 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4985 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4987 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4988 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4989 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4990 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4991 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4998 %union @{ char *string; @}
4999 %token <string> STRING1 STRING2
5000 %type <string> string1 string2
5001 %union @{ char character; @}
5002 %token <character> CHR
5003 %type <character> chr
5006 %destructor @{ @} <character>
5007 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
5008 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
5009 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
5013 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
5014 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
5015 to @code{free} by default.
5016 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
5017 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
5018 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
5019 @code{free} only once.
5020 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
5021 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
5023 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
5024 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
5025 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
5026 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
5027 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
5028 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
5029 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
5030 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
5031 reference it in your grammar.
5032 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
5033 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
5039 @cindex actions in mid-rule
5040 @cindex mid-rule actions
5041 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
5042 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
5043 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
5044 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
5045 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
5046 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
5047 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
5048 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
5052 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
5053 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
5054 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
5059 @cindex discarded symbols
5060 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
5064 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
5066 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
5068 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
5069 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
5071 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
5072 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
5075 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
5078 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
5079 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
5082 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
5083 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
5084 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
5088 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
5089 @cindex printing semantic values
5093 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
5094 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
5095 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
5096 know how semantic values should be formatted.
5098 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
5099 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
5100 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
5102 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
5105 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
5106 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
5107 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
5108 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
5109 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
5110 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
5111 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
5114 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
5115 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
5116 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
5117 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
5125 %union @{ char *string; @}
5126 %token <string> STRING1 STRING2
5127 %type <string> string1 string2
5128 %union @{ char character; @}
5129 %token <character> CHR
5130 %type <character> chr
5133 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
5134 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
5135 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
5136 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
5140 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
5141 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
5142 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
5143 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
5144 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
5145 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
5146 that has no semantic type tag. See also
5150 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
5151 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
5152 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
5153 @cindex warnings, preventing
5154 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
5158 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
5159 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
5160 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
5161 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
5162 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
5163 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
5165 The declaration looks like this:
5171 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
5172 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
5173 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
5174 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
5176 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
5177 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
5178 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
5179 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
5180 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
5181 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
5182 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
5188 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
5192 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
5193 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
5194 print the number of conflicts.
5197 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
5198 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
5199 go back to the beginning.
5202 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
5203 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
5204 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
5207 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
5208 but will keep silent otherwise.
5211 @subsection The Start-Symbol
5212 @cindex declaring the start symbol
5213 @cindex start symbol, declaring
5214 @cindex default start symbol
5217 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
5218 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
5219 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
5226 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
5227 @cindex reentrant parser
5229 @findex %define api.pure
5231 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
5232 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
5233 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
5234 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
5235 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
5236 program must be called only within interlocks.
5238 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
5239 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
5240 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
5241 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
5242 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
5244 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
5245 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
5246 reentrant. It looks like this:
5249 %define api.pure full
5252 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
5253 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
5254 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
5255 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
5256 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
5257 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
5258 of @code{yypstate} in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5259 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
5260 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
5262 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
5263 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
5267 @subsection A Push Parser
5270 @findex %define api.push-pull
5272 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5273 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5275 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
5276 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
5277 each time a new token is made available.
5279 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
5280 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
5281 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
5282 within a certain time period.
5284 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
5285 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
5286 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5289 %define api.push-pull push
5292 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5293 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5294 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5295 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5296 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5299 %define api.pure full
5300 %define api.push-pull push
5303 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5304 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5305 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5306 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5308 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5309 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5310 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5311 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5312 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5313 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5314 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5315 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5319 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5321 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5322 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5323 yypstate_delete (ps);
5326 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5327 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5328 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5329 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5330 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5331 example would thus look like this:
5336 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5339 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5340 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5341 yypstate_delete (ps);
5344 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5345 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5347 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5348 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5349 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5350 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5351 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5352 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5353 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5354 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5355 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5356 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5357 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5358 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5359 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5360 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5361 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5362 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5363 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5367 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5368 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5369 yypstate_delete (ps);
5372 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5373 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5374 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5377 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5378 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5379 @cindex declaration summary
5380 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5382 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5384 @deffn {Directive} %union
5385 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5386 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}).
5389 @deffn {Directive} %token
5390 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5391 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5394 @deffn {Directive} %right
5395 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5396 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5399 @deffn {Directive} %left
5400 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5401 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5404 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5405 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5406 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5407 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5411 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5412 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5413 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5417 @deffn {Directive} %type
5418 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5419 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5422 @deffn {Directive} %start
5423 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5427 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5428 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5429 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5435 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5438 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5439 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5441 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5442 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5443 @xref{%code Summary}.
5446 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5447 Instrument the parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5449 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5452 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5453 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5454 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @{@var{value}@}
5455 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5456 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5459 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5460 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5461 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5462 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5463 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5465 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5466 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5467 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5468 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5469 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5470 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5471 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5472 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5473 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5474 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5476 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5477 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5478 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5480 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5481 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5482 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5484 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5485 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5486 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5487 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5488 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5490 @findex %code requires
5491 @findex %code provides
5492 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5493 header also contains their code.
5494 @xref{%code Summary}.
5496 @cindex Header guard
5497 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5498 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5499 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5500 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5501 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5504 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix @{calc@}} and @samp{%defines
5505 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5507 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5508 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5510 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5514 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5515 Same as above, but save in the file @file{@var{defines-file}}.
5518 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5519 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5520 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5523 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5524 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5525 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5528 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5529 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5530 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5531 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5535 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5536 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5537 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5538 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5539 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5540 accurate syntax error messages.
5543 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5544 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5545 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5547 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5548 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5549 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5550 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5551 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5552 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5553 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5554 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5556 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5560 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5561 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5562 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5567 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5568 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5569 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5570 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5571 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5572 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5573 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5577 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5578 Generate the parser implementation in @file{@var{file}}.
5581 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5582 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5583 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5587 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5588 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5589 Require a Version of Bison}.
5592 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5593 Specify the skeleton to use.
5595 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5596 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5597 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5598 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5600 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5601 file in the Bison installation directory.
5602 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5603 directory of the grammar file.
5604 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5607 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5608 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5609 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5610 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5611 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5612 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5613 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5616 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5617 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5618 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5619 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5620 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5621 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5622 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5625 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5626 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5627 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5631 The highest token number, plus one.
5633 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5635 The number of grammar rules,
5637 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5641 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5642 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5643 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5644 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5648 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5649 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5650 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5654 @node %define Summary
5655 @subsection %define Summary
5657 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5658 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5659 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5660 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5661 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5662 @code{%define} directive:
5664 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5665 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5666 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @{@var{value}@}
5667 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5668 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5670 The type of the values depend on the syntax. Braces denote value in the
5671 target language (e.g., a namespace, a type, etc.). Keyword values (no
5672 delimiters) denote finite choice (e.g., a variation of a feature). String
5673 values denote remaining cases (e.g., a file name).
5675 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define} multiple
5676 times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5679 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5680 @code{%define} accepts.
5682 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5683 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5687 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5689 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5690 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5692 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5694 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5695 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5698 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5699 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5700 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5701 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5702 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5703 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are described below.
5705 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5706 @deffn Directive {%define api.namespace} @{@var{namespace}@}
5708 @item Languages(s): C++
5710 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5711 For example, if you specify:
5714 %define api.namespace @{foo::bar@}
5717 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5720 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5723 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5724 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5727 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5733 @item Accepted Values:
5734 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5735 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5737 @item Default Value:
5738 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5739 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5740 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5741 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5742 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5743 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5744 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5747 %define api.namespace @{foo@}
5748 %name-prefix "bar::"
5751 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5757 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5758 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} @{@var{type}@}
5761 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5763 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5764 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5766 @item Accepted Values: String
5768 @item Default Value: none
5771 Introduced in Bison 2.7 for C, C++ and Java. Introduced under the name
5772 @code{location_type} for C++ in Bison 2.5 and for Java in Bison 2.4.
5776 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5777 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.prefix} @{@var{prefix}@}
5780 @item Language(s): All
5782 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5783 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5785 @item Accepted Values: String
5787 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5789 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5793 @c ================================================== api.pure
5794 @deffn Directive {%define api.pure} @var{purity}
5797 @item Language(s): C
5799 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5800 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5802 @item Accepted Values: @code{true}, @code{false}, @code{full}
5804 The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying @code{true}, as is
5805 the case for Boolean values.
5807 When @code{%define api.pure full} is used, the parser is made reentrant. This
5808 changes the signature for @code{yylex} (@pxref{Pure Calling}), and also that of
5809 @code{yyerror} when the tracking of locations has been activated, as shown
5812 The @code{true} value is very similar to the @code{full} value, the only
5813 difference is in the signature of @code{yyerror} on Yacc parsers without
5814 @code{%parse-param}, for historical reasons.
5816 I.e., if @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5820 void yyerror (char const *msg); // Yacc parsers.
5821 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); // GLR parsers.
5824 But if @samp{%locations %define api.pure %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is
5825 used, then both parsers have the same signature:
5828 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
5831 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5832 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}})
5834 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5837 the @code{full} value was introduced in Bison 2.7
5844 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5845 @deffn Directive {%define api.push-pull} @var{kind}
5848 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5850 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5851 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5852 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5853 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5855 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5857 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5864 @c ================================================== api.token.constructor
5865 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.constructor}
5872 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5873 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5874 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5876 @item Accepted Values:
5879 @item Default Value:
5882 introduced in Bison 3.0
5885 @c api.token.constructor
5888 @c ================================================== api.token.prefix
5889 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.prefix} @{@var{prefix}@}
5892 @item Languages(s): all
5895 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5896 target language. For instance
5899 %token FILE for ERROR
5900 %define api.token.prefix @{TOK_@}
5902 start: FILE for ERROR;
5906 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5907 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5908 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5909 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5910 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5911 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix.
5913 Bison also prefixes the generated member names of the semantic value union.
5914 @xref{Type Generation,, Generating the Semantic Value Type}, for more
5917 See @ref{Calc++ Parser} and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5919 @item Accepted Values:
5920 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5921 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5922 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5924 @item Default Value:
5927 introduced in Bison 3.0
5933 @c ================================================== api.value.type
5934 @deffn Directive {%define api.value.type} @var{support}
5935 @deffnx Directive {%define api.value.type} @{@var{type}@}
5941 The type for semantic values.
5943 @item Accepted Values:
5946 This grammar has no semantic value at all. This is not properly supported
5948 @item @samp{union-directive} (C, C++)
5949 The type is defined thanks to the @code{%union} directive. You don't have
5950 to define @code{api.value.type} in that case, using @code{%union} suffices.
5951 @xref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}.
5954 %define api.value.type union-directive
5960 %token <ival> INT "integer"
5961 %token <sval> STR "string"
5964 @item @samp{union} (C, C++)
5965 The symbols are defined with type names, from which Bison will generate a
5966 @code{union}. For instance:
5968 %define api.value.type union
5969 %token <int> INT "integer"
5970 %token <char *> STR "string"
5972 This feature needs user feedback to stabilize. Note that most C++ objects
5973 cannot be stored in a @code{union}.
5975 @item @samp{variant} (C++)
5976 This is similar to @code{union}, but special storage techniques are used to
5977 allow any kind of C++ object to be used. For instance:
5979 %define api.value.type variant
5980 %token <int> INT "integer"
5981 %token <std::string> STR "string"
5983 This feature needs user feedback to stabilize.
5984 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5986 @item @samp{@{@var{type}@}}
5987 Use this @var{type} as semantic value.
6004 %define api.value.type @{struct my_value@}
6005 %token <u.ival> INT "integer"
6006 %token <u.sval> STR "string"
6010 @item Default Value:
6013 @code{%union} if @code{%union} is used, otherwise @dots{}
6015 @code{int} if type tags are used (i.e., @samp{%token <@var{type}>@dots{}} or
6016 @samp{%token <@var{type}>@dots{}} is used), otherwise @dots{}
6022 introduced in Bison 3.0. Was introduced for Java only in 2.3b as
6029 @c ================================================== location_type
6030 @deffn Directive {%define location_type}
6031 Obsoleted by @code{api.location.type} since Bison 2.7.
6035 @c ================================================== lr.default-reduction
6037 @deffn Directive {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{when}
6040 @item Language(s): all
6042 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
6043 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
6044 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
6045 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6047 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
6048 @item Default Value:
6050 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
6051 @item @code{most} otherwise.
6054 introduced as @code{lr.default-reductions} in 2.5, renamed as
6055 @code{lr.default-reduction} in 3.0.
6059 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-state
6061 @deffn Directive {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state}
6064 @item Language(s): all
6065 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
6066 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
6067 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
6068 @item Default Value: @code{false}
6070 introduced as @code{lr.keep_unreachable_states} in 2.3b, renamed as
6071 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states} in 2.5, and as
6072 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 3.0.
6075 @c lr.keep-unreachable-state
6077 @c ================================================== lr.type
6079 @deffn Directive {%define lr.type} @var{type}
6082 @item Language(s): all
6084 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
6085 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
6086 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6088 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
6090 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
6094 @c ================================================== namespace
6095 @deffn Directive %define namespace @{@var{namespace}@}
6096 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
6100 @c ================================================== parse.assert
6101 @deffn Directive {%define parse.assert}
6104 @item Languages(s): C++
6106 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
6107 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
6109 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
6111 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
6113 @item Default Value: @code{false}
6119 @c ================================================== parse.error
6120 @deffn Directive {%define parse.error} @var{verbosity}
6125 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
6126 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
6128 @item Accepted Values:
6131 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
6133 @item @code{verbose}
6134 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
6135 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
6139 @item Default Value:
6146 @c ================================================== parse.lac
6147 @deffn Directive {%define parse.lac} @var{when}
6150 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
6152 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
6153 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
6154 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
6155 @item Default Value: @code{none}
6160 @c ================================================== parse.trace
6161 @deffn Directive {%define parse.trace}
6164 @item Languages(s): C, C++, Java
6166 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
6167 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
6169 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with
6170 @samp{%define api.prefix @{@var{prefix}@}}), see @ref{Multiple Parsers,
6171 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 in the parser implementation
6172 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
6175 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
6177 @item Default Value: @code{false}
6183 @subsection %code Summary
6187 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
6188 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
6189 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
6190 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
6191 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
6192 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
6193 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
6194 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
6196 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
6197 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
6198 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
6199 in the parser implementation.
6201 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
6202 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
6203 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
6205 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
6208 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
6209 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
6210 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
6211 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
6212 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
6213 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
6217 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
6218 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
6219 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
6222 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
6223 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
6227 @findex %code requires
6230 @item Language(s): C, C++
6232 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
6233 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}. In other words, it's the best place to
6234 define types referenced in @code{%union} directives. If you use
6235 @code{#define} to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
6236 definitions, then it is also the best place. However you should rather
6237 @code{%define} @code{api.value.type} and @code{api.location.type}.
6239 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
6240 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
6245 @findex %code provides
6248 @item Language(s): C, C++
6250 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
6251 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
6253 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
6254 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
6262 @item Language(s): C, C++
6264 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
6265 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
6266 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
6267 parser implementation file. For example:
6276 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
6280 @findex %code imports
6283 @item Language(s): Java
6285 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
6287 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
6288 before any class definitions.
6292 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
6293 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
6294 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
6295 of the standard Bison skeletons.
6298 @node Multiple Parsers
6299 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
6301 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
6302 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
6303 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
6304 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
6305 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
6306 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
6307 exported in the generated header.
6309 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
6310 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
6311 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
6312 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
6313 @{@var{prefix}@}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@{@var{prefix}@}}, see
6314 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
6315 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
6316 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
6317 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
6319 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
6320 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
6321 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
6322 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
6323 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
6324 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
6325 specifically --- more about this below.
6327 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix @{c@}}, the names become
6328 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
6331 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
6332 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
6333 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
6334 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
6337 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
6338 #define yyparse cparse
6339 #define yylval clval
6345 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
6346 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
6347 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
6349 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
6353 extern CSTYPE clval;
6357 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
6358 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
6359 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
6364 # if defined YYDEBUG
6381 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
6382 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
6383 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
6386 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
6387 @cindex C-language interface
6390 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
6391 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
6392 functions that it needs to use.
6394 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
6395 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
6396 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
6397 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
6400 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
6401 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
6402 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
6403 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
6404 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
6405 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
6407 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
6408 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
6409 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
6413 @node Parser Function
6414 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
6417 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
6418 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
6419 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
6420 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
6421 without reading further.
6424 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
6425 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
6426 is due to end-of-input).
6428 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
6429 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
6432 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
6435 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
6440 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
6445 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
6448 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
6449 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
6450 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
6452 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6453 @findex %parse-param
6454 Declare that one or more
6455 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
6456 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
6457 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
6458 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
6461 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
6464 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
6468 Then call the parser like this:
6472 int nastiness, randomness;
6473 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
6474 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
6480 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
6483 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
6487 Using the following:
6489 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6492 Results in these signatures:
6494 void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
6495 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6499 Or, if both @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure})
6500 and @code{%locations} are used:
6503 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
6504 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6507 @node Push Parser Function
6508 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
6509 @findex yypush_parse
6511 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6512 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6514 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
6515 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6516 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6517 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6519 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6520 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6521 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6522 required to finish parsing the grammar.
6525 @node Pull Parser Function
6526 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6527 @findex yypull_parse
6529 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6530 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6532 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6533 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
6534 declaration is used.
6535 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6537 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6538 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6541 @node Parser Create Function
6542 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6543 @findex yypstate_new
6545 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6546 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6548 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6549 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6550 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6551 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6553 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6554 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6555 or 0 if no memory was available.
6556 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6560 @node Parser Delete Function
6561 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6562 @findex yypstate_delete
6564 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6565 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6567 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6568 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6569 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6570 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6572 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6573 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6574 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6578 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6580 @cindex lexical analyzer
6582 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6583 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6584 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6585 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6587 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6588 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6589 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6590 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6591 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6592 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6593 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6597 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6598 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6599 of the token it has read.
6600 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6601 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6603 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6604 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6607 @node Calling Convention
6608 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6610 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6611 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6612 signifies end-of-input.
6614 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6615 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6616 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6617 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6619 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6620 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6621 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6622 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6623 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6624 signifies end-of-input.
6626 Here is an example showing these things:
6633 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6636 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6637 return c; /* Assume token type for '+' is '+'. */
6639 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6645 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6646 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6648 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6649 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6653 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6654 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6655 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6656 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6659 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6660 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6661 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6662 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6663 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6666 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6667 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6668 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6669 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6672 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6675 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6676 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6677 strlen (token_buffer))
6678 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6679 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6684 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6685 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6689 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6692 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6693 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6694 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6695 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6701 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6702 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6707 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6708 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6709 Union Declaration}). So when you store a token's value, you
6710 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6711 declaration looks like this:
6724 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6729 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6730 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6735 @node Token Locations
6736 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6739 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6740 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6741 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6742 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6743 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6744 data in that variable.
6746 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6747 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6748 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6749 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6750 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6753 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6756 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6758 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure full} to request a
6759 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6760 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6761 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6762 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6763 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6768 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6771 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6772 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6777 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6778 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6779 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6782 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6783 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6784 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6785 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6787 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6789 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6790 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6791 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6794 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6796 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6797 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6798 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6799 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6800 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6807 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6808 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6809 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6813 results in the following signatures:
6816 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6817 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6820 If @samp{%define api.pure full} is added:
6823 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6824 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6828 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure full} and @code{%locations} are
6832 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6833 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6834 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6837 @node Error Reporting
6838 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6839 @cindex error reporting function
6842 @cindex syntax error
6844 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6845 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6846 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6847 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6850 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6851 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6852 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6853 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6854 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6856 @findex %define parse.error
6857 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6858 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6859 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6860 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6861 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6863 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6864 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6865 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6866 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6867 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6868 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6870 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6871 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6872 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6874 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6879 yyerror (char const *s)
6883 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6888 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6889 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6890 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6891 immediately return 1.
6893 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6894 an access to the current location. With @code{%define api.pure}, this is
6895 indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
6896 historical reasons, and this is the why @code{%define api.pure full} should be
6897 prefered over @code{%define api.pure}.
6899 When @code{%locations %define api.pure full} is used, @code{yyerror} has the
6900 following signature:
6903 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
6907 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6908 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6909 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6910 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6911 message is always passed last.
6913 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6914 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6915 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6919 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6920 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6921 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6922 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6924 @node Action Features
6925 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6926 @cindex summary, action features
6927 @cindex action features summary
6929 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6930 are useful in actions.
6932 @deffn {Variable} $$
6933 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6934 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6937 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6938 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6939 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6942 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6943 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6944 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6945 Types of Values in Actions}.
6948 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6949 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6950 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6951 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6954 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6955 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6956 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6959 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6960 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6961 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6964 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6966 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6967 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6968 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6969 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6970 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6971 going to be reduced by this rule.
6973 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6974 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6975 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6978 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6981 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6982 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6985 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6986 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6990 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6991 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6992 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6993 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6994 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6995 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6998 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6999 @findex YYRECOVERING
7000 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7001 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7002 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7005 @deffn {Variable} yychar
7006 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
7007 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
7008 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
7009 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
7011 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
7014 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
7015 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
7017 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
7019 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7022 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
7023 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
7024 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
7025 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7028 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
7029 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
7030 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
7031 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
7033 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
7036 @deffn {Variable} yylval
7037 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
7038 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
7039 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
7041 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
7045 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
7046 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
7049 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
7053 @c int first_line, last_line;
7054 @c int first_column, last_column;
7058 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
7059 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
7061 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
7062 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
7063 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
7066 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
7069 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
7071 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
7072 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
7076 @node Internationalization
7077 @section Parser Internationalization
7078 @cindex internationalization
7084 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
7085 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
7086 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
7087 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
7088 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
7089 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
7090 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
7091 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
7094 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
7095 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
7096 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
7101 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
7102 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
7103 by the package ---often called @file{m4}--- copy the
7104 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
7105 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
7109 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
7114 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
7115 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
7116 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
7117 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
7118 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
7119 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
7120 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
7121 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
7122 Bison-generated parser.
7125 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
7126 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
7127 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
7131 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
7134 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
7135 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
7136 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
7140 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
7141 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
7142 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
7145 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
7151 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
7155 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
7161 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
7162 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
7163 @cindex algorithm of parser
7166 @cindex parser stack
7167 @cindex stack, parser
7169 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
7170 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
7171 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
7173 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
7174 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
7177 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
7178 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
7179 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
7180 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
7181 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
7182 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
7183 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
7185 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
7192 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
7193 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
7196 expr: expr '*' expr;
7200 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
7207 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
7208 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
7210 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
7211 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
7212 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
7214 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
7217 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
7218 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
7219 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
7220 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
7221 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
7222 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
7223 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
7224 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
7225 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
7226 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
7230 @section Lookahead Tokens
7231 @cindex lookahead token
7233 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
7234 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
7235 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
7236 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
7237 token in order to decide what to do.
7239 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
7240 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
7241 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
7242 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
7243 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
7244 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
7245 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
7248 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
7249 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
7250 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
7269 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
7270 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
7271 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
7272 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
7273 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
7275 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
7276 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
7277 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
7278 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
7279 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
7280 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
7285 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
7286 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
7287 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
7288 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7291 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
7293 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
7294 @cindex dangling @code{else}
7295 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
7297 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
7298 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
7303 "if" expr "then" stmt
7304 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7310 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
7311 specific keyword tokens.
7313 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
7314 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
7315 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
7316 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
7319 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
7320 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
7321 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
7322 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
7323 contrast it with the other alternative.
7325 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
7326 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
7330 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7332 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
7335 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
7336 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
7337 making these two inputs equivalent:
7340 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7342 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
7345 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
7346 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
7347 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
7348 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
7349 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
7350 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
7351 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
7352 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
7354 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
7355 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
7356 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
7357 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
7359 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
7360 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
7361 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
7362 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
7363 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
7366 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
7367 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
7368 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
7382 "if" expr "then" stmt
7383 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7393 @section Operator Precedence
7394 @cindex operator precedence
7395 @cindex precedence of operators
7397 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
7398 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
7399 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
7400 shift and when to reduce.
7403 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
7404 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
7405 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
7406 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
7407 * How Precedence:: How they work.
7408 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
7411 @node Why Precedence
7412 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
7414 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
7415 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
7430 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
7431 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
7432 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
7433 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
7434 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
7435 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
7436 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
7439 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
7440 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
7441 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
7442 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
7443 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
7444 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
7445 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
7446 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
7449 @cindex associativity
7450 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
7451 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
7452 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
7453 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
7454 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
7455 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
7456 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
7457 makes right-associativity.
7459 @node Using Precedence
7460 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
7466 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
7467 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
7468 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
7469 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
7470 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
7471 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
7472 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
7474 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
7475 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
7476 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
7477 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
7478 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
7479 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
7480 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
7481 what expected the grammar author.
7483 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
7484 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
7485 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
7486 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
7487 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
7489 @node Precedence Only
7490 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
7493 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
7494 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
7495 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
7496 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
7497 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
7498 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
7499 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
7501 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
7502 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
7503 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
7507 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
7510 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
7511 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
7512 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
7513 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7514 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7515 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7516 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7523 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7524 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7525 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7526 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7527 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7528 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7529 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7531 @node Precedence Examples
7532 @subsection Precedence Examples
7534 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7542 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7543 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7544 declared with @code{'-'}:
7547 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
7552 @node How Precedence
7553 @subsection How Precedence Works
7555 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7556 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7557 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7558 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7559 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7560 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7562 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7563 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7564 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7565 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7566 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7567 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7568 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7571 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7572 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7575 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
7577 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
7578 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
7579 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7580 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
7582 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
7583 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
7584 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
7585 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
7586 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
7587 instance as follows:
7596 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
7597 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
7598 use right associativity:
7601 %right "then" "else"
7604 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
7605 ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
7606 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
7607 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
7608 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
7609 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
7610 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
7612 @node Contextual Precedence
7613 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7614 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7615 @cindex unary operator precedence
7616 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7617 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7620 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7621 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7622 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7623 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7625 The Bison precedence declarations
7626 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7627 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7628 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7631 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7632 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7633 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7634 modifier's syntax is:
7637 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7641 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7642 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7643 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7644 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7645 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7647 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7648 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7649 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7659 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7667 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7672 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7673 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7674 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7675 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7677 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7678 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7679 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7680 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7682 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7683 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7684 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7685 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7686 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7687 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7689 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7690 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7694 @section Parser States
7695 @cindex finite-state machine
7696 @cindex parser state
7697 @cindex state (of parser)
7699 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7700 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7701 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7702 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7703 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7705 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7706 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7707 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7708 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7709 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7710 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7711 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7712 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7715 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7716 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7717 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7720 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7721 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7722 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7724 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7725 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7728 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7729 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7734 %empty @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7736 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7742 %empty @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7743 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7749 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7750 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7751 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7752 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7753 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7754 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7756 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7757 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7758 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7760 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7761 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7762 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7763 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7764 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7766 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7767 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7768 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7769 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7774 %empty @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7775 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7780 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7787 | sequence redirects
7801 | redirects redirect
7807 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7808 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7809 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7810 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7811 in infinitely many ways!
7813 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7814 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7815 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7816 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7818 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7829 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7837 | sequence redirects
7851 | redirects redirect
7856 Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7857 @samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7858 @samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7859 @code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7860 shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7863 To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7864 being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7866 To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7867 @code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7868 as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7869 @ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7870 relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7875 %precedence "sequence"
7880 | sequence word %prec "sequence"
7881 | sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7893 Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7894 rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7897 %right "word" "redirect"
7902 | sequence word %prec "word"
7903 | sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7908 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7909 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7910 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7912 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7918 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7921 | name_list ':' type
7938 | name ',' name_list
7943 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7944 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7945 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7946 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7950 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7952 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7953 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7954 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7956 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7957 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7958 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7959 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7960 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7961 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7962 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7965 @cindex canonical LR
7966 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7967 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7968 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7969 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7970 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7971 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7972 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7973 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7975 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7976 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7977 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7978 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7979 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7987 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7992 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7993 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7994 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7995 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7996 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7997 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7999 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
8000 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
8001 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
8002 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
8003 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
8004 rather than the one for @code{name}.
8010 | name_list ':' type
8022 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
8023 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
8028 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
8029 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
8030 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
8031 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
8032 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
8033 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
8034 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
8036 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
8037 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
8038 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
8039 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
8041 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
8042 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
8045 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
8046 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
8047 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
8048 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
8051 @node LR Table Construction
8052 @subsection LR Table Construction
8053 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
8056 @cindex canonical LR
8057 @findex %define lr.type
8059 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
8060 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
8061 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
8062 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
8065 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
8066 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
8067 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
8068 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
8071 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
8072 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
8073 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
8076 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type} @var{type}
8077 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
8078 values for @var{type} are:
8081 @item @code{lalr} (default)
8083 @item @code{canonical-lr}
8086 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
8090 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
8094 %define lr.type ielr
8097 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
8098 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
8099 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
8100 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
8101 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
8102 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
8103 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
8104 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
8105 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
8106 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
8108 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
8109 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
8110 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
8111 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
8117 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
8120 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
8122 @cindex GLR with LALR
8123 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
8124 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%precedence}),
8126 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
8127 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
8128 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
8129 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
8130 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
8131 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
8132 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
8133 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
8135 @item Malformed grammars.
8137 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
8138 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
8139 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
8140 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
8141 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
8146 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
8147 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
8148 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
8149 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
8150 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
8151 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
8152 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
8153 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
8154 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
8158 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
8161 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
8162 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
8163 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
8164 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
8165 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
8166 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
8167 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
8168 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
8169 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
8170 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
8171 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
8172 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
8175 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
8176 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
8177 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
8179 @node Default Reductions
8180 @subsection Default Reductions
8181 @cindex default reductions
8182 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
8185 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
8186 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
8187 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
8188 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
8189 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
8191 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
8192 also affect the behavior of the parser:
8195 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
8197 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
8198 @cindex consistent states
8199 @cindex defaulted states
8200 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
8201 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
8202 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
8203 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
8204 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
8205 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
8206 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
8207 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
8208 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
8209 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
8210 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
8212 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
8213 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
8214 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
8215 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
8216 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
8217 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
8218 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
8219 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
8220 should already be considered closed.
8222 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
8224 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
8225 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
8226 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
8227 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
8228 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
8229 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
8230 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
8231 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
8232 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
8236 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
8237 @c sentence from being rejected.
8238 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
8239 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
8240 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
8241 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
8242 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
8243 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
8246 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
8247 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
8248 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
8249 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
8250 because the accept action ends the parse.
8252 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
8253 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
8254 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
8255 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
8256 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
8257 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
8258 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
8259 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
8260 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
8261 split the parse instead.
8263 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
8264 @code{%define lr.default-reduction} directive.
8266 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{where}
8267 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
8268 The accepted values of @var{where} are:
8270 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
8271 @item @code{consistent}
8272 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
8275 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
8276 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8281 @findex %define parse.lac
8283 @cindex lookahead correction
8285 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
8286 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
8287 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
8288 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
8289 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
8290 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
8291 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
8292 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
8293 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
8295 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
8296 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
8297 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
8298 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
8299 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
8301 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
8302 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
8303 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
8304 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
8306 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac} @var{value}
8307 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
8309 @item @code{none} (default)
8312 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
8313 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
8317 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
8318 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
8319 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
8320 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
8321 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
8322 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
8323 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
8324 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
8325 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
8326 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
8329 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
8330 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
8331 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
8332 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
8333 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
8334 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
8335 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
8336 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
8337 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
8338 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
8340 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
8341 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
8342 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
8343 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
8344 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
8345 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
8346 language-recognition power.
8348 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
8351 @item Infinite parsing loops.
8353 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
8354 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
8355 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
8356 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
8359 @item Verbose error message limitations.
8361 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
8362 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
8363 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
8364 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
8365 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
8366 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
8370 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
8371 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
8372 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
8373 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
8374 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
8375 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
8376 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
8377 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
8378 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
8379 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
8380 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
8383 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
8384 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
8385 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
8387 @node Unreachable States
8388 @subsection Unreachable States
8389 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
8390 @cindex unreachable states
8392 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
8393 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
8394 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
8395 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
8397 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
8398 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
8399 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
8400 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
8402 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state} @var{value}
8403 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
8404 @var{value} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
8407 There are a few caveats to consider:
8410 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
8412 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
8413 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
8414 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
8415 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
8416 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
8417 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
8419 @item Other useless states.
8421 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
8422 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
8423 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
8424 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
8425 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
8426 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
8427 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
8430 @node Generalized LR Parsing
8431 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
8433 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
8434 @cindex ambiguous grammars
8435 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
8437 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
8438 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
8439 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
8440 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
8441 context-free languages.
8442 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
8443 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
8444 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
8445 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
8446 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
8447 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
8448 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
8449 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
8451 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
8452 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
8453 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
8454 parser uses the same basic
8455 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
8456 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
8457 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
8458 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
8460 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
8461 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
8462 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
8463 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
8464 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
8466 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
8467 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
8468 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
8469 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
8470 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
8471 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
8472 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
8473 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
8474 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
8475 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
8476 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
8479 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
8480 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
8481 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
8482 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
8483 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
8484 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
8485 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
8486 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
8487 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
8488 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
8489 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
8490 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
8492 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
8493 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
8494 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
8496 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
8497 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
8498 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
8499 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
8500 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
8501 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
8502 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
8503 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
8504 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
8505 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
8506 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
8507 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
8509 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
8512 @node Memory Management
8513 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
8514 @cindex memory exhaustion
8515 @cindex memory management
8516 @cindex stack overflow
8517 @cindex parser stack overflow
8518 @cindex overflow of parser stack
8520 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
8521 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
8522 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
8524 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
8525 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
8526 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
8529 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
8530 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
8531 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
8532 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
8534 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
8535 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
8536 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
8537 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
8538 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
8539 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
8541 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
8542 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
8543 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
8546 @cindex default stack limit
8547 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
8551 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
8552 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
8553 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
8554 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
8555 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
8557 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
8559 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
8560 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
8561 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
8562 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
8563 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
8564 non-trivial copy constructors.
8565 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
8568 @node Error Recovery
8569 @chapter Error Recovery
8570 @cindex error recovery
8571 @cindex recovery from errors
8573 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
8574 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
8575 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
8578 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
8579 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
8580 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
8581 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
8582 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
8583 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
8584 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
8587 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
8588 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
8589 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
8590 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
8591 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
8592 in the current context, the parse can continue.
8604 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8605 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8607 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8608 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8609 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8610 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8611 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8612 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8613 applicable in the ordinary way.
8615 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8616 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8617 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8618 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8619 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8620 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8621 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8622 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8623 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8624 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8625 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8626 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8628 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8629 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8630 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8633 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8636 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8637 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8638 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8639 spurious error message:
8649 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8650 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8651 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8652 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8653 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8654 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8655 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8658 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8659 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8660 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8661 error messages resume.
8663 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8664 as any other rules can.
8667 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8668 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8669 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8670 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8673 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8674 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8675 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8677 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8679 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8680 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8681 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8682 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8683 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8685 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8686 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8687 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8688 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8691 @node Context Dependency
8692 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8694 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8695 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8696 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8697 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8701 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8702 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8703 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8704 error recovery rules must be written.
8707 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8708 neither clean nor robust.)
8710 @node Semantic Tokens
8711 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8713 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8714 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8720 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8721 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8722 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8724 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8725 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8726 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8727 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8728 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8730 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8731 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8732 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8733 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8734 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8735 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8736 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8738 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8739 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8740 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8741 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8745 typedef int foo, bar;
8749 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8750 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8756 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8757 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8759 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8760 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8761 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8762 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8763 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8768 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8769 | declarator maybeasm
8775 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8776 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8782 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8783 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8784 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8786 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8787 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8788 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8789 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8790 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8791 the syntactic context.
8793 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8794 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8795 @cindex lexical tie-in
8797 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8798 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8801 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8802 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8803 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8804 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8805 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8812 void yyerror (char const *);
8821 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8822 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8823 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8837 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8838 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8839 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8841 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8842 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8843 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8846 @node Tie-in Recovery
8847 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8849 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8850 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8852 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8853 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8854 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8855 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8860 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8862 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8866 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8867 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8868 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8869 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8870 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8872 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8874 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8875 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8876 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8882 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8888 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8889 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8890 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8891 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8893 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8894 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8895 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8896 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8897 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8898 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8901 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8904 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8906 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8907 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8908 chapter explains how understand and debug a parser.
8910 The first sections focus on the static part of the parser: its structure.
8911 They explain how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8912 automaton. There are several formats available:
8915 as text, see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser};
8918 as a graph, see @ref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser};
8921 or as a markup report that can be turned, for instance, into HTML, see
8922 @ref{Xml,, Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}.
8925 The last section focuses on the dynamic part of the parser: how to enable
8926 and understand the parser run-time traces (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your
8930 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8931 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8932 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8933 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8937 @section Understanding Your Parser
8939 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8940 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8941 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8942 tune or simply fix a parser.
8944 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8945 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8946 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8947 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8948 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8949 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8950 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8952 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8974 @command{bison} reports:
8977 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8978 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8979 calc.y:12.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8980 calc.y:12.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8981 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8984 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8985 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8986 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8987 interpretation is the same.
8990 @cindex token, useless
8991 @cindex useless token
8992 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8993 @cindex useless nonterminal
8994 @cindex rule, useless
8995 @cindex useless rule
8996 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8997 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8998 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8999 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
9002 Nonterminals useless in grammar
9005 Terminals unused in grammar
9008 Rules useless in grammar
9013 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
9016 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
9017 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
9018 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
9019 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
9023 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
9038 and reports the uses of the symbols:
9042 Terminals, with rules where they appear
9055 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
9060 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
9066 @cindex pointed rule
9067 @cindex rule, pointed
9068 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
9069 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
9070 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
9071 the location of the input cursor.
9076 0 $accept: . exp $end
9078 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9083 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
9084 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
9085 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
9086 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
9087 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
9088 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
9089 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
9090 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
9092 @cindex core, item set
9093 @cindex item set core
9094 @cindex kernel, item set
9095 @cindex item set core
9096 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
9097 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
9098 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
9099 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
9100 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
9101 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
9106 0 $accept: . exp $end
9107 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
9113 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9119 In the state 1@dots{}
9126 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
9130 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
9131 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
9132 State 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
9133 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
9138 0 $accept: exp . $end
9139 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9144 $end shift, and go to state 3
9145 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9146 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9147 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9148 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9152 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
9153 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
9154 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
9155 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
9156 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
9159 @cindex accepting state
9160 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
9166 0 $accept: exp $end .
9172 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
9173 read), the parsing exits successfully.
9175 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
9181 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
9183 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9190 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
9192 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9199 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
9201 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9208 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
9210 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9215 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
9221 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9227 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9228 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9230 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9231 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9234 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
9235 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
9236 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
9237 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
9238 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
9239 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
9240 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
9241 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
9243 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
9244 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
9245 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
9248 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
9249 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
9250 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
9251 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
9252 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
9253 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
9254 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
9255 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
9256 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
9257 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
9258 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
9259 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
9264 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9265 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
9270 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9271 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9273 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9274 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9277 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
9278 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
9279 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
9280 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
9281 conflicts in the report:
9284 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
9285 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
9286 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
9290 The remaining states are similar:
9296 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9302 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9303 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9305 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
9306 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
9312 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9318 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9320 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
9321 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
9327 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9333 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9334 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9335 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9336 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9338 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9339 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9340 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9341 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9342 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
9347 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
9348 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and @samp{*}, but
9349 also because the associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
9351 Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML file and
9352 XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}).
9354 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
9357 @section Visualizing Your Parser
9360 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
9361 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
9362 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
9363 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
9364 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
9365 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
9366 to help them understand LR parsers.
9368 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
9369 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
9370 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
9371 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
9372 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}. A DOT file may also be
9373 produced via an XML file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your
9374 parser in multiple formats}).
9377 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
9388 The graphical output
9390 (see @ref{fig:graph})
9392 is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is easier understood by
9393 making direct comparisons between them. @xref{Debugging, , Debugging Your
9394 Parser}, for a detailled analysis of the textual report.
9397 @float Figure,fig:graph
9398 @image{figs/example, 430pt}
9399 @caption{A graphical rendering of the parser.}
9403 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
9405 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
9406 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
9407 about transitions, for examples
9409 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
9410 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
9411 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
9416 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
9419 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
9421 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
9422 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
9430 ";" shift, and go to state 6
9434 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9436 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
9438 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
9440 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
9441 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
9442 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
9443 action for the given state, there is no such label.
9445 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
9452 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
9453 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
9456 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9458 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
9460 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
9461 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
9462 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
9463 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
9464 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
9466 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation
9467 state. It is shown as a blue diamond, labelled ``Acc''.
9469 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
9471 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
9472 the name of the rule being jumped to.
9474 @c ================================================= XML
9477 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
9480 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
9481 (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}) when invoked
9482 with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
9483 (@pxref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser}) when invoked with
9484 option @option{--graph}. However,
9485 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
9486 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
9487 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
9488 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
9489 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
9490 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
9492 The XML file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
9493 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
9494 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
9495 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
9496 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
9497 file is @file{foo.xml}.
9499 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
9500 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
9504 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
9506 Used to output a copy of the @samp{.output} file.
9508 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the @samp{.output} file.
9511 Sample usage (requires @command{xsltproc}):
9515 $ bison --print-datadir
9516 /usr/local/share/bison
9518 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl gr.xml >gr.html
9521 @c ================================================= Tracing
9524 @section Tracing Your Parser
9527 @cindex tracing the parser
9529 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
9530 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
9533 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
9534 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
9535 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
9538 @node Enabling Traces
9539 @subsection Enabling Traces
9540 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
9543 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
9545 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
9546 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
9547 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
9548 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
9551 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
9552 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
9553 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
9554 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
9555 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
9557 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
9558 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
9559 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
9560 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix @{c@}}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
9561 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
9563 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
9565 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
9566 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
9567 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
9569 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
9570 @findex %define parse.trace
9571 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
9572 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
9573 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
9574 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
9575 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
9578 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
9582 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
9583 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
9584 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
9585 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
9586 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
9587 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
9589 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
9590 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
9591 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
9592 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
9594 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
9595 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
9596 messages tell you these things:
9600 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
9603 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
9604 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
9607 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
9608 of the state stack afterward.
9611 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
9612 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
9613 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
9614 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
9615 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
9616 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
9617 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
9618 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
9619 grammar are to blame.
9621 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
9622 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
9623 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
9624 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
9625 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
9628 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
9630 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
9631 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
9632 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
9633 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
9634 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
9635 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
9637 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
9638 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
9639 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
9642 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
9644 /* Generate the parser description file. */
9646 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
9649 /* Formatting semantic values. */
9650 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
9651 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
9652 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <double>;
9655 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
9656 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
9657 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
9658 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
9659 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
9660 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
9662 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
9663 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
9664 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
9665 tag: since @code{<double>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp},
9666 this printer will be used for them.
9668 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
9669 are sent onto standard error.
9672 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
9675 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
9676 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9682 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
9683 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
9684 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
9685 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
9687 Then the parser calls the scanner.
9689 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9690 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9695 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9696 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9697 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9701 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9702 Shifting token '(' ()
9704 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9705 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9707 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9708 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9709 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9715 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9716 @code{<double>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting nonterminal
9717 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9720 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9721 Shifting token '-' ()
9723 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9724 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9726 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9727 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9728 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9729 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9731 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9732 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9733 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9735 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9736 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9742 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9743 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9746 Next token is token ')' ()
9747 Shifting token ')' ()
9749 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9750 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9752 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9754 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9760 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9764 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9765 Shifting token '\n' ()
9767 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9768 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9771 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9774 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9777 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9782 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9783 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9784 completion of the parsing.
9787 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9788 Shifting token $end ()
9791 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9792 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9796 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9797 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9800 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9801 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9802 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9804 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9806 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9807 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9808 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9810 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9813 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9814 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9818 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9819 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9820 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9823 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9826 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9829 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9830 else if (type == NUM)
9831 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9835 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9838 @chapter Invoking Bison
9839 @cindex invoking Bison
9840 @cindex Bison invocation
9841 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9843 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9849 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9850 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9851 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9852 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9853 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9854 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9855 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9856 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9857 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9858 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9859 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9864 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9867 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9870 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9873 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9875 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9876 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9877 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9880 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9881 in alphabetical order by short options.
9882 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9883 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9887 @section Bison Options
9889 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9890 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9891 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9892 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9893 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9896 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9897 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9900 @c Please, keep this ordered as in 'bison --help'.
9906 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9910 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9912 @item --print-localedir
9913 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9915 @item --print-datadir
9916 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9920 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9921 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9922 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9923 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9924 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9925 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9926 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9927 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9928 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9929 for compatibility with POSIX:
9936 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9937 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9938 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9939 this option is specified.
9941 @item -W [@var{category}]
9942 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9943 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9946 @item midrule-values
9947 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9949 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9952 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9955 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9956 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9959 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9962 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9963 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9964 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9967 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9971 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9972 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9973 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9974 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9975 no effect on the conflict report.
9978 Deprecated constructs whose support will be removed in future versions of
9982 Empty rules without @code{%empty}. @xref{Empty Rules}. Disabled by
9983 default, but enabled by uses of @code{%empty}, unless
9984 @option{-Wno-empty-rule} was specified.
9987 Useless precedence and associativity directives. Disabled by default.
9989 Consider for instance the following grammar:
10018 @c cannot leave the location and the [-Wprecedence] for lack of
10022 warning: useless precedence and associativity for "="
10027 warning: useless associativity for "*", use %precedence
10032 warning: useless precedence for "("
10038 One would get the exact same parser with the following directives instead:
10048 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
10050 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
10051 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
10055 All the warnings except @code{yacc}.
10058 Turn off all the warnings.
10061 See @option{-Werror}, below.
10064 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
10065 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
10066 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
10069 Turn enabled warnings for every @var{category} into errors, unless they are
10070 explicitly disabled by @option{-Wno-error=@var{category}}.
10072 @item -Werror=@var{category}
10073 Enable warnings falling in @var{category}, and treat them as errors.
10075 @var{category} is the same as for @option{--warnings}, with the exception that
10076 it may not be prefixed with @samp{no-} (see above).
10078 Note that the precedence of the @samp{=} and @samp{,} operators is such that
10079 the following commands are @emph{not} equivalent, as the first will not treat
10080 S/R conflicts as errors.
10083 $ bison -Werror=yacc,conflicts-sr input.y
10084 $ bison -Werror=yacc,error=conflicts-sr input.y
10088 Do not turn enabled warnings for every @var{category} into errors, unless
10089 they are explicitly enabled by @option{-Werror=@var{category}}.
10091 @item -Wno-error=@var{category}
10092 Deactivate the error treatment for this @var{category}. However, the warning
10093 itself won't be disabled, or enabled, by this option.
10095 @item -f [@var{feature}]
10096 @itemx --feature[=@var{feature}]
10097 Activate miscellaneous @var{feature}. @var{feature} can be one of:
10100 @itemx diagnostics-show-caret
10101 Show caret errors, in a manner similar to GCC's
10102 @option{-fdiagnostics-show-caret}, or Clang's @option{-fcaret-diagnotics}. The
10103 location provided with the message is used to quote the corresponding line of
10104 the source file, underlining the important part of it with carets (^). Here is
10105 an example, using the following file @file{in.y}:
10110 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10113 When invoked with @option{-fcaret} (or nothing), Bison will report:
10117 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: '$exp'
10118 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10122 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
10123 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10127 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
10128 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10132 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
10133 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10137 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of 'exp' has no declared type
10138 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10143 Whereas, when invoked with @option{-fno-caret}, Bison will only report:
10147 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: ‘$exp’
10148 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
10149 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
10150 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
10151 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of ‘exp’ has no declared type
10155 This option is activated by default.
10166 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
10167 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
10168 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10170 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
10171 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
10172 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
10173 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
10174 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
10175 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
10176 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
10180 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
10183 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
10184 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
10185 definition for @var{name}.
10187 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
10188 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
10189 definitions for @var{name}.
10191 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
10192 definitions for @var{name}.
10195 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
10196 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
10197 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
10199 @item -L @var{language}
10200 @itemx --language=@var{language}
10201 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
10202 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
10203 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
10204 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
10207 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10209 @item -p @var{prefix}
10210 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
10211 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
10212 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
10213 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
10217 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
10218 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
10219 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
10220 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
10221 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
10222 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
10224 @item -S @var{file}
10225 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
10226 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
10227 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
10229 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
10230 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
10231 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
10232 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
10234 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
10235 file in the Bison installation directory.
10236 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
10237 current working directory.
10238 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
10241 @itemx --token-table
10242 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10249 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
10250 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10251 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
10252 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10255 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
10256 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
10257 with other short options.
10259 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
10260 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
10261 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
10262 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10264 @item -r @var{things}
10265 @itemx --report=@var{things}
10266 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
10267 separated list of @var{things} among:
10271 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
10272 parser's automaton.
10275 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10276 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
10279 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10280 each rule's lookahead set.
10283 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
10284 precedence and associativity directives.
10287 Enable all the items.
10290 Do not generate the report.
10293 @item --report-file=@var{file}
10294 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
10298 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10299 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
10300 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10302 @item -o @var{file}
10303 @itemx --output=@var{file}
10304 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
10306 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
10307 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
10309 @item -g [@var{file}]
10310 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
10311 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
10312 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
10313 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
10314 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
10315 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10318 @item -x [@var{file}]
10319 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
10320 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
10321 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
10322 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10324 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
10325 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10328 @node Option Cross Key
10329 @section Option Cross Key
10331 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
10332 the corresponding short option and directive.
10334 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
10335 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
10336 @include cross-options.texi
10340 @section Yacc Library
10342 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
10343 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
10344 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
10345 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
10346 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
10347 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
10348 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
10350 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
10351 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
10354 int yyerror (char const *);
10357 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
10358 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
10359 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
10362 int yyparse (void);
10365 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
10367 @node Other Languages
10368 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
10371 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
10372 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
10376 @section C++ Parsers
10379 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
10380 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
10381 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
10382 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10383 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
10384 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
10387 @node C++ Bison Interface
10388 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
10389 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
10391 @c - initial action
10393 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
10394 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
10395 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
10396 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10398 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
10400 @findex %define api.namespace
10401 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
10402 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
10403 in the following files:
10408 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
10409 location tracking when enabled. These files are not generated if the
10410 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++
10414 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
10416 @item @var{file}.hh
10417 @itemx @var{file}.cc
10418 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
10419 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
10420 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
10421 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
10423 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
10424 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
10425 @samp{%defines} directive.
10428 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
10429 for a complete and accurate documentation.
10431 @node C++ Semantic Values
10432 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
10433 @c - No objects in unions
10435 @c - Printer and destructor
10437 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
10438 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
10439 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
10440 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
10443 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
10444 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
10448 @subsubsection C++ Unions
10450 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
10451 Union Declaration}. In particular it produces a genuine
10452 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
10455 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
10456 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
10457 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
10459 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
10460 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
10461 to such objects are allowed.
10464 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
10465 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
10466 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
10470 @subsubsection C++ Variants
10472 Bison provides a @emph{variant} based implementation of semantic values for
10473 C++. This alleviates all the limitations reported in the previous section,
10474 and in particular, object types can be used without pointers.
10476 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
10477 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
10478 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
10479 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
10481 For instance, instead of
10489 %token <ival> NUMBER;
10490 %token <sval> STRING;
10497 %token <int> NUMBER;
10498 %token <std::string> STRING;
10501 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
10502 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
10505 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
10506 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
10507 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
10509 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
10510 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
10511 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
10512 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
10513 eventually, destroyed.
10515 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
10516 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
10517 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
10520 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
10521 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
10525 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
10526 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
10527 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
10528 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
10529 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
10530 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
10531 that would be duplicating the information.
10533 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
10534 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
10535 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
10536 (the current implementation of) variants:
10539 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
10540 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
10541 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
10542 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
10543 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
10544 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
10547 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
10550 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
10551 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
10553 @node C++ Location Values
10554 @subsection C++ Location Values
10556 @c - class Position
10557 @c - class Location
10558 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
10560 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
10561 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
10563 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
10564 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10565 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
10566 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
10567 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
10570 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
10571 genuine code only the latter is used.
10574 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
10575 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
10576 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
10580 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
10582 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10583 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
10584 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
10588 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10589 Reset the position to the given values.
10592 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
10593 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
10594 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
10595 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
10596 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
10599 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
10600 The line, starting at 1.
10603 @deftypemethod {position} {void} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10604 If @var{height} is not null, advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the
10605 column number. The resulting line number cannot be less than 1.
10608 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
10609 The column, starting at 1.
10612 @deftypemethod {position} {void} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10613 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number. The
10614 resulting column number cannot be less than 1.
10617 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
10618 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
10619 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
10620 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
10621 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
10624 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
10625 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
10626 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
10629 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
10630 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
10631 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
10632 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
10636 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
10638 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
10639 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10642 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
10643 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
10644 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10647 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10648 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
10651 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
10652 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
10653 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10656 @deftypemethod {location} {void} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10657 @deftypemethodx {location} {void} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10658 Forwarded to the @code{end} position.
10661 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
10662 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
10663 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
10664 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator- (int @var{width})
10665 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator-= (int @var{width})
10666 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
10669 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
10670 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
10673 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
10674 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
10675 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
10679 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
10680 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
10681 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
10684 @node User Defined Location Type
10685 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
10686 @findex %define api.location.type
10688 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
10689 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
10692 %define api.location.type @{@var{LocationType}@}
10695 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
10698 it must be copyable;
10701 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
10702 parser basically runs
10704 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
10705 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
10708 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
10711 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
10712 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
10715 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
10716 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
10721 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
10722 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
10723 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
10724 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
10729 %define api.namespace @{master::@}
10733 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
10734 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
10737 %define api.location.type @{master::location@}
10738 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
10741 @node C++ Parser Interface
10742 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
10743 @c - define parser_class_name
10745 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10747 @c - Reporting errors
10749 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
10750 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
10751 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
10752 @samp{%define parser_class_name @{@var{name}@}}. The interface of
10753 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
10754 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
10755 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
10756 additional argument for its constructor.
10758 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
10759 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
10760 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
10763 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
10764 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
10765 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
10766 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
10767 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
10768 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
10771 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
10772 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
10773 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
10774 equivalent with first
10775 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
10776 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
10777 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
10778 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
10779 function invoked from the user action.
10782 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10783 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
10784 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
10787 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10788 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
10789 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
10792 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
10793 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
10796 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
10797 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
10798 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
10801 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
10802 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
10803 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10807 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
10808 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
10809 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10810 or nonzero, full tracing.
10813 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10814 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
10815 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
10816 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
10817 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
10822 @node C++ Scanner Interface
10823 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
10824 @c - prefix for yylex.
10825 @c - Pure interface to yylex
10828 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
10829 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
10830 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
10831 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
10834 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
10835 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
10838 @node Split Symbols
10839 @subsubsection Split Symbols
10841 The interface is as follows.
10843 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10844 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10845 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
10846 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
10847 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10850 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
10851 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
10853 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
10857 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
10858 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10861 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
10862 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10866 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
10867 initialized. So the code would look like:
10871 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
10872 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10875 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
10876 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10885 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
10886 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10889 yylval.build(yytext);
10890 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10895 @node Complete Symbols
10896 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
10898 If you specified both @code{%define api.value.type variant} and
10899 @code{%define api.token.constructor},
10900 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
10901 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
10902 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
10903 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
10905 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10906 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
10907 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
10908 the @var{location}.
10911 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
10912 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
10913 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
10914 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
10916 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
10918 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10919 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
10920 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
10921 including the @code{api.token.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
10922 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
10923 also pass the @var{location}.
10926 For instance, given the following declarations:
10929 %define api.token.prefix @{TOK_@}
10930 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
10931 %token <int> INTEGER;
10936 Bison generates the following functions:
10939 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
10940 const location_type& l);
10941 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
10942 const location_type& loc);
10943 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
10947 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
10950 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
10951 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10952 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
10955 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
10956 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
10958 @node A Complete C++ Example
10959 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
10961 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10962 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10963 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10964 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10965 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10966 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10967 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
10968 actually easier to interface with.
10971 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10972 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10973 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10974 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10975 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10978 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10979 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10981 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10982 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10983 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10984 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10985 of valid input follows.
10989 seven := one + two * three
10993 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10994 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10996 @c - A place to store error messages
10997 @c - A place for the result
10999 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
11000 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
11001 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
11002 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
11003 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
11004 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
11005 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
11007 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
11008 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
11009 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
11012 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11014 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
11015 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
11018 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
11023 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
11024 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
11025 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
11026 factor both as follows.
11028 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11030 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
11032 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
11033 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
11038 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
11041 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11043 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
11044 class calcxx_driver
11048 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
11050 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
11056 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
11057 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
11059 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11061 // Handling the scanner.
11062 void scan_begin ();
11064 bool trace_scanning;
11068 Similarly for the parser itself.
11070 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11072 // Run the parser on file F.
11073 // Return 0 on success.
11074 int parse (const std::string& f);
11075 // The name of the file being parsed.
11076 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
11078 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
11079 bool trace_parsing;
11083 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
11084 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
11085 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
11086 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
11088 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11091 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
11092 void error (const std::string& m);
11094 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
11097 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
11098 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
11099 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
11100 messages and set error state.
11102 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
11104 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
11105 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
11107 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
11108 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
11110 variables["one"] = 1;
11111 variables["two"] = 2;
11114 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
11119 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
11123 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
11124 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
11125 int res = parser.parse ();
11131 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
11133 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
11137 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
11139 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
11143 @node Calc++ Parser
11144 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
11146 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
11147 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
11148 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
11149 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
11152 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11154 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
11155 %require "@value{VERSION}"
11157 %define parser_class_name @{calcxx_parser@}
11161 @findex %define api.token.constructor
11162 @findex %define api.value.type variant
11163 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
11164 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
11165 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
11166 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{api.token.constructor}.
11168 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11170 %define api.token.constructor
11171 %define api.value.type variant
11172 %define parse.assert
11176 @findex %code requires
11177 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
11178 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
11179 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
11180 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
11181 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
11182 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
11183 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
11185 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11190 class calcxx_driver;
11195 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
11196 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
11199 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11201 // The parsing context.
11202 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
11206 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
11207 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
11208 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
11211 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11216 // Initialize the initial location.
11217 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
11222 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
11223 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
11226 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11228 %define parse.trace
11229 %define parse.error verbose
11234 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
11235 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
11237 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11241 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
11247 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
11248 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
11249 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
11250 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
11251 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}).
11253 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11255 %define api.token.prefix @{TOK_@}
11257 END 0 "end of file"
11269 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
11270 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
11273 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11275 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
11276 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
11281 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
11282 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
11283 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
11284 @code{operator<<} (@pxref{Printer Decl, , Printing Semantic Values}).
11286 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11288 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
11292 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
11293 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
11295 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11299 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
11303 | assignments assignment @{@};
11306 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
11311 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
11312 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
11313 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
11314 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
11315 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
11316 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
11317 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
11322 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
11325 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11328 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
11329 const std::string& m)
11331 driver.error (l, m);
11335 @node Calc++ Scanner
11336 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
11338 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
11339 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
11341 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11343 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
11345 # include <climits>
11346 # include <cstdlib>
11348 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
11349 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
11351 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
11352 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
11353 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
11354 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
11356 # define yywrap() 1
11358 // The location of the current token.
11359 static yy::location loc;
11364 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
11365 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
11366 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
11367 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
11369 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11371 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug noinput
11375 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
11377 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11379 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
11385 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
11386 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
11387 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
11388 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
11389 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
11390 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
11391 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
11393 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11397 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
11398 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
11404 // Code run each time yylex is called.
11408 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
11409 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
11413 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
11415 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11417 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
11418 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
11419 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
11420 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
11421 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
11422 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
11423 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
11428 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
11429 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
11430 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
11431 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
11434 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
11435 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
11436 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
11441 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
11442 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
11444 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11448 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
11450 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
11451 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
11453 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
11455 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
11456 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11463 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
11470 @node Calc++ Top Level
11471 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
11473 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
11475 @comment file: calc++.cc
11477 #include <iostream>
11478 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
11482 main (int argc, char *argv[])
11485 calcxx_driver driver;
11486 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
11487 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
11488 driver.trace_parsing = true;
11489 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
11490 driver.trace_scanning = true;
11491 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
11492 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
11501 @section Java Parsers
11504 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
11505 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
11506 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
11507 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
11508 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
11509 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
11510 * Java Push Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the a push parser
11511 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11512 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
11515 @node Java Bison Interface
11516 @subsection Java Bison Interface
11517 @c - %language "Java"
11519 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
11520 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11522 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
11523 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
11525 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11526 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
11527 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
11528 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
11529 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
11530 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
11531 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
11532 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
11533 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
11534 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
11536 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
11538 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
11539 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
11540 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
11541 and @code{%define api.pure} directives do nothing when used in Java.
11543 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
11544 api.push-pull} have no effect.
11546 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
11547 @code{glr-parser} directive.
11549 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
11550 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
11552 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
11553 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
11554 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
11556 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
11557 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
11558 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
11560 if needed. Also, in the future the
11561 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
11562 access the token names and codes.
11564 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
11565 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
11566 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
11567 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
11570 @node Java Semantic Values
11571 @subsection Java Semantic Values
11572 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
11574 @c - Printer and destructor
11576 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
11577 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
11578 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
11581 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
11582 %type <Integer> number
11585 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
11586 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
11587 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
11588 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define api.value.type}
11589 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
11592 %define api.value.type @{ASTNode@}
11596 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
11597 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
11599 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11600 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
11601 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
11602 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
11603 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
11604 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
11606 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
11607 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
11608 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
11610 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
11611 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
11612 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
11615 @node Java Location Values
11616 @subsection Java Location Values
11618 @c - class Position
11619 @c - class Location
11621 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
11622 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
11623 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
11624 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
11625 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
11626 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
11627 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type @{@var{class-name}@}}.
11629 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
11630 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
11631 with @code{%define api.position.type @{@var{class-name}@}}. This class must
11632 be supplied by the user.
11635 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
11636 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
11637 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
11640 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
11641 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
11644 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
11645 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
11648 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
11649 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
11650 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
11651 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
11655 @node Java Parser Interface
11656 @subsection Java Parser Interface
11657 @c - define parser_class_name
11659 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
11661 @c - Reporting errors
11663 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
11664 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
11665 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
11666 @samp{%define parser_class_name @{@var{name}@}} to give a custom name to
11667 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
11669 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
11670 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
11671 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
11672 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
11673 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
11674 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
11675 A single @samp{%define annotations @{@var{annotations}@}} directive can
11676 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
11678 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
11679 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
11680 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
11681 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
11683 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
11684 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
11685 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
11686 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
11687 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
11688 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
11690 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
11691 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
11692 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
11693 which initialize them automatically.
11695 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11696 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
11697 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
11698 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
11700 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11701 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11702 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11705 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11706 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
11707 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
11710 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
11711 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
11712 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
11714 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11715 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11716 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11719 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
11720 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
11721 @code{false} otherwise.
11724 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
11725 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
11726 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
11727 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
11728 verbose error messages.
11731 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11732 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
11733 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11734 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11735 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11736 available only if location tracking is active.
11739 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
11740 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
11741 from a syntax error.
11742 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11745 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
11746 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
11747 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
11751 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
11752 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
11753 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
11754 or nonzero, full tracing.
11757 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
11758 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
11759 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
11763 @node Java Scanner Interface
11764 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
11767 @c - Lexer interface
11769 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
11770 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
11771 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
11772 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
11773 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
11776 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
11777 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
11778 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
11779 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
11782 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
11783 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
11784 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
11785 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
11788 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
11790 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11791 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
11792 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
11793 changed using @code{%define api.location.type @{@var{class-name}@}}.
11796 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
11797 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
11798 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
11801 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11802 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11805 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
11806 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
11807 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
11808 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
11809 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
11811 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
11812 @{@var{class-name}@}}.
11815 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
11816 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
11818 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define api.value.type
11819 @{@var{class-name}@}}.
11822 @node Java Action Features
11823 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
11825 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
11826 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
11828 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
11829 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
11832 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11833 This may not be assigned to.
11834 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11837 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
11838 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
11839 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11843 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
11844 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
11845 @samp{%define api.value.type}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
11846 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
11847 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
11848 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11851 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
11852 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
11853 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
11854 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
11856 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11860 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11861 This may not be assigned to.
11862 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11866 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
11867 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11870 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
11871 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
11872 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11875 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
11876 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
11877 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11880 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
11881 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
11882 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11885 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
11886 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
11887 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
11889 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11892 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11893 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11894 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11895 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11896 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11897 available only if location tracking is active.
11900 @node Java Push Parser Interface
11901 @subsection Java Push Parser Interface
11902 @c - define push_parse
11903 @findex %define api.push-pull
11905 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve. More
11906 user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11908 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser for Java.
11909 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
11910 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
11913 %define api.push-pull push
11916 Most of the discussion about the Java pull Parser Interface, (@pxref{Java
11917 Parser Interface}) applies to the push parser interface as well.
11919 When generating a push parser, the method @code{push_parse} is created with
11920 the following signature (depending on if locations are enabled).
11922 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} push_parse ({int} @var{token}, {Object} @var{yylval})
11923 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} push_parse ({int} @var{token}, {Object} @var{yylval}, {Location} @var{yyloc})
11924 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} push_parse ({int} @var{token}, {Object} @var{yylval}, {Position} @var{yypos})
11927 The primary difference with respect to a pull parser is that the parser
11928 method @code{push_parse} is invoked repeatedly to parse each token. This
11929 function is available if either the "%define api.push-pull push" or "%define
11930 api.push-pull both" declaration is used (@pxref{%define
11931 Summary,,api.push-pull}). The @code{Location} and @code{Position}
11932 parameters are available only if location tracking is active.
11934 The value returned by the @code{push_parse} method is one of the following
11935 four constants: @code{YYABORT}, @code{YYACCEPT}, @code{YYERROR}, or
11936 @code{YYPUSH_MORE}. This new value, @code{YYPUSH_MORE}, may be returned if
11937 more input is required to finish parsing the grammar.
11939 If api.push-pull is declared as @code{both}, then the generated parser class
11940 will also implement the @code{parse} method. This method's body is a loop
11941 that repeatedly invokes the scanner and then passes the values obtained from
11942 the scanner to the @code{push_parse} method.
11944 There is one additional complication. Technically, the push parser does not
11945 need to know about the scanner (i.e. an object implementing the
11946 @code{YYParser.Lexer} interface), but it does need access to the
11947 @code{yyerror} method. Currently, the @code{yyerror} method is defined in
11948 the @code{YYParser.Lexer} interface. Hence, an implementation of that
11949 interface is still required in order to provide an implementation of
11950 @code{yyerror}. The current approach (and subject to change) is to require
11951 the @code{YYParser} constructor to be given an object implementing the
11952 @code{YYParser.Lexer} interface. This object need only implement the
11953 @code{yyerror} method; the other methods can be stubbed since they will
11954 never be invoked. The simplest way to do this is to add a trivial scanner
11955 implementation to your grammar file using whatever implementation of
11956 @code{yyerror} is desired. The following code sample shows a simple way to
11962 public Object getLVal () @{return null;@}
11963 public int yylex () @{return 0;@}
11964 public void yyerror (String s) @{System.err.println(s);@}
11968 @node Java Differences
11969 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11971 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
11972 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
11973 section summarizes these differences.
11977 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
11978 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
11979 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
11980 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
11981 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
11982 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
11983 @xref{Java Action Features}.
11985 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
11986 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
11987 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
11988 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
11989 corresponds to these C macros.}.
11992 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
11993 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
11994 @samp{%define api.value.type}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
11995 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
11996 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
11997 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
11998 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
11999 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
12000 @ref{Java Action Features}.
12003 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
12005 @item @code{%code imports}
12006 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
12007 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
12008 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
12010 @item unqualified @code{%code}
12011 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
12013 @item @code{%code lexer}
12014 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
12015 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
12016 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
12020 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
12021 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
12022 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
12024 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
12025 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
12030 @node Java Declarations Summary
12031 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
12033 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
12034 meaning when used in a Java parser.
12036 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
12037 Generate a Java class for the parser.
12040 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
12041 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
12042 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
12043 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
12044 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
12047 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12048 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
12049 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
12050 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12053 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
12054 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
12055 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
12056 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12059 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
12060 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
12061 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
12064 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
12065 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
12066 a Java @emph{type}.
12067 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
12070 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12071 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
12072 @xref{Java Differences}.
12075 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12076 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
12077 @xref{Java Differences}.
12080 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12081 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
12082 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12085 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12086 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
12087 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
12090 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
12091 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
12092 @emph{outside} the parser class.
12093 @xref{Java Differences}.
12096 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
12097 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
12098 @xref{Java Differences}.
12101 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
12102 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
12103 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12106 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} @{@var{annotations}@}
12107 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
12108 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12111 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} @{@var{superclass}@}
12112 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
12113 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12116 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
12117 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
12118 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12121 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} @{@var{interfaces}@}
12122 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
12124 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12127 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} @{@var{exceptions}@}
12128 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
12129 constructor. Default is none.
12130 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12133 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} @{@var{exceptions}@}
12134 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
12135 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
12136 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
12139 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} @{@var{class}@}
12140 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
12141 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
12142 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
12143 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
12144 @xref{Java Location Values}.
12147 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} @{@var{package}@}
12148 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
12149 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12152 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} @{@var{name}@}
12153 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
12154 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
12155 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12158 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} @{@var{class}@}
12159 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
12160 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
12161 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
12162 @xref{Java Location Values}.
12165 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
12166 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
12167 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12170 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.value.type} @{@var{class}@}
12171 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
12172 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
12175 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
12176 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
12177 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12180 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} @{@var{exceptions}@}
12181 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
12182 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
12183 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12187 @c ================================================= FAQ
12190 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
12191 @cindex frequently asked questions
12194 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
12198 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
12199 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
12200 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
12201 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
12202 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
12203 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
12204 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
12205 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
12206 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
12207 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
12208 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
12209 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
12212 @node Memory Exhausted
12213 @section Memory Exhausted
12216 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
12217 message. What can I do?
12220 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12223 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
12224 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
12226 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
12227 following typical questions:
12230 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
12231 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
12232 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
12239 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
12240 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
12241 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure full}.
12244 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
12245 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
12246 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
12247 demonstration, consider the following source file,
12248 @file{first-line.l}:
12254 #include <stdlib.h>
12258 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
12262 yyparse (char const *file)
12264 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
12268 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
12272 /* One token only. */
12274 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
12277 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
12295 If the file @file{input} contains
12303 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
12306 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
12307 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
12308 $ @kbd{./first-line}
12313 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
12314 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
12315 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
12316 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
12317 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
12318 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
12319 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
12320 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
12323 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
12324 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
12325 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
12326 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
12328 @node Strings are Destroyed
12329 @section Strings are Destroyed
12332 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
12333 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
12334 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
12337 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
12338 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
12339 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
12345 char *yylval = NULL;
12350 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
12358 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
12359 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
12360 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
12361 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
12367 If you compile and run this code, you get:
12370 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12371 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12372 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12378 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
12379 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
12380 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
12381 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
12382 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
12383 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
12386 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12387 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12388 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12393 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
12394 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
12397 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
12398 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
12401 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
12402 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
12403 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
12404 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
12405 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
12406 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
12407 execute simple instructions one after the others.
12409 @cindex abstract syntax tree
12411 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
12412 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
12413 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
12414 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
12415 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
12416 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
12419 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
12420 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
12423 @node Multiple start-symbols
12424 @section Multiple start-symbols
12427 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
12428 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
12429 multiple entry points.
12432 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
12433 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
12434 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
12435 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
12439 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
12446 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
12447 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
12449 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
12450 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
12451 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
12452 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
12453 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
12454 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
12455 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
12456 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
12459 /* @r{Prologue.} */
12464 int t = start_token;
12469 /* @r{The rules.} */
12473 @node Secure? Conform?
12474 @section Secure? Conform?
12477 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
12480 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
12481 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
12482 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
12483 please send us a bug report.
12485 @node I can't build Bison
12486 @section I can't build Bison
12489 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
12490 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
12494 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
12495 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
12496 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
12497 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
12498 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
12499 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
12500 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
12503 @node Where can I find help?
12504 @section Where can I find help?
12507 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
12510 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
12511 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
12512 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
12513 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
12514 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
12515 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
12516 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
12517 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
12521 @section Bug Reports
12524 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
12527 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
12528 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
12529 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
12530 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
12531 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
12533 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
12534 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
12535 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
12536 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
12537 easier it will be to fix the bug.
12539 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
12540 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
12541 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
12542 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
12543 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
12544 send additional files as well (such as @file{config.h} or @file{config.cache}).
12546 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
12547 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
12549 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
12551 @node More Languages
12552 @section More Languages
12555 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
12556 favorite language here}?
12559 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
12560 languages; contributions are welcome.
12563 @section Beta Testing
12566 What is involved in being a beta tester?
12569 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
12570 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
12571 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
12572 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
12573 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
12574 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
12575 essentially halted.
12577 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
12578 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
12579 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
12580 systems are especially welcome.
12582 @node Mailing Lists
12583 @section Mailing Lists
12586 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
12589 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
12591 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
12593 @node Table of Symbols
12594 @appendix Bison Symbols
12595 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
12596 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
12598 @deffn {Variable} @@$
12599 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
12600 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12603 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
12604 @deffnx {Symbol} @@@var{n}
12605 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
12606 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12608 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12609 with a semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12612 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
12613 @deffnx {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
12614 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12615 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12618 @deffn {Symbol} $@@@var{n}
12619 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12620 with no semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12623 @deffn {Variable} $$
12624 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
12628 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
12629 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
12630 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
12633 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
12634 @deffnx {Variable} $[@var{name}]
12635 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12639 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
12640 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
12641 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
12642 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
12645 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
12646 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
12647 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
12648 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
12649 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
12653 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
12654 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
12655 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
12656 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
12657 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
12658 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
12659 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
12661 This feature is experimental.
12662 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12666 @deffn {Construct} /* @dots{} */
12667 @deffnx {Construct} // @dots{}
12668 Comments, as in C/C++.
12671 @deffn {Delimiter} :
12672 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
12676 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
12677 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12680 @deffn {Delimiter} |
12681 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
12682 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12685 @deffn {Directive} <*>
12686 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
12689 This feature is experimental.
12690 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12693 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12696 @deffn {Directive} <>
12697 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
12700 This feature is experimental.
12701 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12704 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12707 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
12708 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
12709 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
12710 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
12713 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
12714 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
12715 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
12716 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
12717 @xref{%code Summary}.
12720 @deffn {Directive} %debug
12721 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12725 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
12726 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12727 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12732 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
12733 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
12734 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @{@var{value}@}
12735 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
12736 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
12739 @deffn {Directive} %defines
12740 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
12741 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12744 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
12745 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
12746 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12749 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
12750 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
12751 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12754 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
12755 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
12756 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
12760 @deffn {Directive} %empty
12761 Bison declaration to declare make explicit that a rule has an empty
12762 right-hand side. @xref{Empty Rules}.
12765 @deffn {Symbol} $end
12766 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
12767 used in the grammar.
12770 @deffn {Symbol} error
12771 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
12772 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
12773 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
12774 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
12775 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
12776 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
12777 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
12778 @xref{Error Recovery}.
12781 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
12782 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
12783 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12786 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12787 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
12791 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
12792 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
12793 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12796 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
12797 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
12800 @deffn {Directive} %language
12801 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
12802 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12805 @deffn {Directive} %left
12806 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
12807 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12810 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12811 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
12812 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
12816 @deffn {Directive} %merge
12817 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
12818 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
12819 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
12820 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12823 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12824 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
12825 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
12827 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
12828 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
12829 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
12831 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
12832 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
12833 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
12834 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
12835 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
12836 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
12837 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
12838 @code{%define api.namespace} documentation in this section.
12843 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
12844 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12845 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12850 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
12851 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
12852 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12855 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
12856 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
12857 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12860 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
12861 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
12862 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12865 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12866 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
12867 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
12868 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12871 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12872 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
12873 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12876 @deffn {Directive} %prec
12877 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
12878 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
12881 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
12882 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
12883 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12886 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
12887 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
12888 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
12889 unreasonable usage.
12892 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
12893 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
12894 Require a Version of Bison}.
12897 @deffn {Directive} %right
12898 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
12899 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12902 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
12903 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
12904 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12907 @deffn {Directive} %start
12908 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
12912 @deffn {Directive} %token
12913 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
12914 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
12917 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
12918 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
12919 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12922 @deffn {Directive} %type
12923 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
12924 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
12927 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
12928 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
12929 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
12933 @deffn {Directive} %union
12934 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
12935 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}.
12938 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
12939 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
12940 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
12941 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
12942 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12944 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
12948 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
12949 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
12950 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
12951 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12953 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
12957 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
12958 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
12959 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12962 @deffn {Variable} yychar
12963 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
12964 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
12965 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
12966 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12969 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
12970 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
12971 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12974 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
12975 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
12976 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12979 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
12980 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
12981 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
12982 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12985 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
12986 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
12987 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12990 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
12991 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
12992 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
12993 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
12994 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
12995 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12997 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
13001 @deffn {Function} yyerror
13002 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
13003 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
13006 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
13007 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
13008 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
13009 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
13010 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
13011 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
13012 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
13015 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
13016 Macro used to output run-time traces.
13017 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
13020 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
13021 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
13022 @xref{Memory Management}.
13025 @deffn {Function} yylex
13026 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
13027 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
13031 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
13032 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
13033 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
13034 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
13036 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
13038 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
13039 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
13040 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
13043 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
13044 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
13045 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
13048 @deffn {Variable} yylval
13049 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
13050 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
13051 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
13053 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
13054 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
13055 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
13058 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
13059 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
13063 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
13064 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
13065 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
13066 pure push parser, it is a member of @code{yypstate}.)
13067 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
13070 @deffn {Function} yyparse
13071 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
13072 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
13075 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
13076 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
13077 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
13078 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
13081 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
13082 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
13083 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
13084 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
13085 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
13086 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13087 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13090 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
13091 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
13092 call this function to create a new parser.
13093 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
13094 @code{yypstate_new}}.
13095 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13096 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13099 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
13100 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
13101 parse the rest of the input stream.
13102 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
13103 @code{yypull_parse}}.
13104 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13105 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13108 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
13109 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
13110 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
13111 @code{yypush_parse}}.
13112 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13113 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13116 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
13117 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
13118 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
13119 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
13122 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
13123 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
13124 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
13125 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
13126 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
13127 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
13128 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
13130 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
13131 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
13132 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
13133 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
13134 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
13135 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
13136 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
13139 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
13140 Deprecated in favor of the @code{%define} variable @code{api.value.type}.
13141 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
13142 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
13150 @item Accepting state
13151 A state whose only action is the accept action.
13152 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
13153 @xref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}.
13155 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
13156 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
13157 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
13158 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
13159 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13161 @item Consistent state
13162 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
13164 @item Context-free grammars
13165 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
13166 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
13167 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
13168 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
13171 @item Default reduction
13172 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
13173 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
13174 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
13175 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
13178 @item Defaulted state
13179 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
13181 @item Dynamic allocation
13182 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
13183 compile time or on entry to a function.
13186 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
13187 character string of length zero.
13189 @item Finite-state stack machine
13190 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
13191 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
13192 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
13193 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
13194 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
13195 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13197 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
13198 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
13199 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
13200 deterministic parsing
13201 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
13202 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
13203 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
13207 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
13208 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
13209 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13211 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
13212 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
13213 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
13214 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
13215 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
13216 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
13217 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
13218 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
13219 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
13220 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
13222 @item Infix operator
13223 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
13224 performs some operation.
13227 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
13229 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
13230 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
13231 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
13232 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
13233 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
13234 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
13235 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
13237 @item Language construct
13238 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
13239 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
13240 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13242 @item Left associativity
13243 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
13244 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
13245 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
13247 @item Left recursion
13248 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
13249 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
13252 @item Left-to-right parsing
13253 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
13254 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13256 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
13257 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
13258 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
13260 @item Lexical tie-in
13261 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
13262 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
13264 @item Literal string token
13265 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
13267 @item Lookahead token
13268 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
13272 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
13273 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
13274 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
13277 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
13278 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
13280 @item Nonterminal symbol
13281 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
13282 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
13283 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
13286 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
13287 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
13290 @item Postfix operator
13291 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
13292 performs some operation.
13295 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
13296 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
13300 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
13301 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
13302 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
13304 @item Reverse polish notation
13305 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
13307 @item Right recursion
13308 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
13309 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
13313 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
13314 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
13315 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
13318 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
13319 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
13320 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13322 @item Single-character literal
13323 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
13324 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
13327 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
13328 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
13329 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
13330 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
13333 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
13334 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
13335 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
13338 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
13339 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
13342 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
13343 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
13344 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
13345 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
13347 @item Terminal symbol
13348 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
13349 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
13350 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13352 @item Unreachable state
13353 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
13354 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
13355 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
13358 @node Copying This Manual
13359 @appendix Copying This Manual
13363 @unnumbered Bibliography
13367 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
13368 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
13369 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
13370 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
13372 @item [Denny 2010 May]
13373 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
13374 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
13375 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
13376 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
13378 @item [Denny 2010 November]
13379 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
13380 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
13381 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
13382 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
13384 @item [DeRemer 1982]
13385 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
13386 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
13387 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
13388 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
13391 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
13392 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
13393 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
13396 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
13397 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
13398 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
13399 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
13402 @node Index of Terms
13403 @unnumbered Index of Terms
13409 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
13410 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
13411 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
13412 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
13413 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
13414 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
13415 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
13416 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
13417 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
13418 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
13419 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
13420 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
13421 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
13422 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
13423 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
13424 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
13425 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
13426 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
13427 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
13428 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
13429 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
13430 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
13431 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
13432 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
13433 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
13434 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
13435 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
13436 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
13437 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
13438 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
13439 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
13440 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
13441 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
13442 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
13443 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
13444 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
13445 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
13446 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
13447 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
13448 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
13449 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
13450 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
13451 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
13452 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
13453 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
13454 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
13455 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
13456 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
13457 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
13458 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
13459 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
13460 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
13461 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
13462 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
13463 @c LocalWords: parsers parser's
13464 @c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
13465 @c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
13466 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
13468 @c Local Variables:
13469 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"