1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
193 Outline of a Bison Grammar
195 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
201 Defining Language Semantics
203 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
227 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
228 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
229 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
230 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
231 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
232 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
233 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
235 Parser C-Language Interface
237 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
238 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
241 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
242 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
244 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
245 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
246 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
249 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
251 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
252 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
253 of the token it has read.
254 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
255 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
257 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
258 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
260 The Bison Parser Algorithm
262 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
263 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
264 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
265 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
266 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
267 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
268 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
269 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
270 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
271 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
275 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
276 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
277 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
278 * How Precedence:: How they work.
279 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
283 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
284 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
285 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
286 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
288 Handling Context Dependencies
290 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
291 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
292 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
293 error recovery rules must be written.
295 Debugging Your Parser
297 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
298 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
299 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
300 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
304 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
305 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
306 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
310 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
311 in alphabetical order by short options.
312 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
313 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
315 Parsers Written In Other Languages
317 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
318 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
322 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
323 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
324 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
325 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
326 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
327 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
331 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
332 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
333 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
335 A Complete C++ Example
337 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
338 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
339 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
340 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
341 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
345 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
346 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
347 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
348 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
349 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
350 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
351 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
352 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
354 Frequently Asked Questions
356 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
357 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
358 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
359 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
360 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
361 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
362 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
363 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
364 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
365 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
366 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
367 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
371 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
377 @unnumbered Introduction
380 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
381 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
382 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
383 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
384 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
385 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
386 calculators to complex programming languages.
388 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
389 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
390 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
391 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
392 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
395 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
396 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
397 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
398 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
401 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
402 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
403 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
404 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
405 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
406 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
409 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
412 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
414 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
415 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
416 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
417 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
418 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
420 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
422 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
423 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
424 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
425 License to all of the Bison source code.
427 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
428 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
429 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
430 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
431 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
432 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
433 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
435 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
436 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
437 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
438 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
439 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
440 using the other GNU tools.
442 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
443 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
444 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
445 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
449 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
450 @include gpl-3.0.texi
453 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
455 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
456 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
457 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
460 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
461 as mathematical ideas.
462 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
463 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
464 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
465 the name of an identifier, etc.).
466 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
467 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
468 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
469 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
470 how is the output used?
471 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
472 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
475 @node Language and Grammar
476 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
478 @cindex context-free grammar
479 @cindex grammar, context-free
480 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
481 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
482 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
483 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
484 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
485 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
486 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
487 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
491 @cindex Backus-Naur form
492 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
493 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
494 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
495 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
496 essentially machine-readable BNF.
498 @cindex LALR grammars
499 @cindex IELR grammars
501 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
502 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
503 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
504 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
505 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
506 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
507 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
508 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
509 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
510 Construction}, to learn how.
513 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
514 @cindex ambiguous grammars
515 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
517 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
518 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
519 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
520 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
521 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
522 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
523 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
524 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
525 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
526 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
527 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
528 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
529 possible parses of any given string is finite.
531 @cindex symbols (abstract)
533 @cindex syntactic grouping
534 @cindex grouping, syntactic
535 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
536 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
537 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
538 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
539 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
540 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
541 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
543 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
544 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
545 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
546 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
547 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
548 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
549 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
550 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
551 lexicography, not grammar.)
553 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
556 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
557 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
558 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
559 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
560 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
561 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
562 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
565 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
566 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
567 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
568 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
569 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
570 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
571 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
572 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
574 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
575 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
576 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
577 reads informally as follows:
580 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
585 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
589 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
590 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
591 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
592 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
595 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
596 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
597 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
598 not the start symbol.
600 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
601 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
602 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
603 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
604 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
605 reports a syntax error.
607 @node Grammar in Bison
608 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
609 @cindex Bison grammar
610 @cindex grammar, Bison
611 @cindex formal grammar
613 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
614 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
615 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
617 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
618 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
619 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
621 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
622 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
623 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
624 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
625 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
626 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
627 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
630 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
631 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
632 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
633 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
635 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
636 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
638 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
639 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
640 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
641 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
645 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
649 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
651 @node Semantic Values
652 @section Semantic Values
653 @cindex semantic value
654 @cindex value, semantic
656 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
657 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
658 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
659 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
660 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
663 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
664 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
665 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
666 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
667 ,Defining Language Semantics},
670 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
671 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
672 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
673 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
676 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
677 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
678 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
679 need to have any semantic value.)
681 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
682 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
683 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
684 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
685 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
686 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
688 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
689 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
690 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
691 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
692 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
694 @node Semantic Actions
695 @section Semantic Actions
696 @cindex semantic actions
697 @cindex actions, semantic
699 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
700 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
701 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
702 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
705 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
706 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
707 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
708 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
709 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
710 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
711 newly recognized larger expression.
713 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
717 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
721 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
722 from the values of the two subexpressions.
725 @section Writing GLR Parsers
727 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
730 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
731 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
733 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
734 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
735 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
736 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
737 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
738 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
739 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
740 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
741 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
743 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
744 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
745 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
746 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
747 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
748 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
749 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
750 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
751 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
752 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
753 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
754 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
755 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
756 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
757 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
758 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
759 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
760 identical set of symbols.
762 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
763 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
764 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
765 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
766 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
767 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
768 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
769 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
770 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
774 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
775 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
776 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
777 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
780 @node Simple GLR Parsers
781 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
782 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
783 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
787 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
788 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
790 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
791 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
792 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
794 Consider a problem that
795 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
796 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
799 type subrange = lo .. hi;
800 type enum = (a, b, c);
804 The original language standard allows only numeric
805 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
806 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
807 10206) and many other
808 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
809 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
813 type subrange = (a) .. b;
817 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
818 type with only one value:
825 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
826 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
828 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
829 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
830 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
831 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
832 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
833 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
834 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
835 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
837 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
838 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
839 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
840 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
843 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
844 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
845 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
846 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
847 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
848 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
851 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
852 use the GLR algorithm.
853 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
854 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
855 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
856 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
857 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
858 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
859 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
860 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
861 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
863 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
864 reports a syntax error as usual.
866 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
867 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
868 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
869 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
870 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
872 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
873 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
874 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
875 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
876 The present example contains only one conflict between two
877 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
878 cannot be nested. So the number of
879 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
880 and the parsing time is still linear.
882 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
883 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
886 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
896 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
925 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
926 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
927 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
928 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
935 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
936 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
937 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
946 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
947 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
948 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
949 notice when the parser splits.
951 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
952 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
953 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
954 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
955 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
956 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
957 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
958 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
959 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
960 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
961 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
962 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
963 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
966 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
967 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
968 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
969 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
970 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
971 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
973 @node Merging GLR Parses
974 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
975 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
976 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
980 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
982 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
987 #define YYSTYPE char const *
989 void yyerror (char const *);
1003 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1012 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1013 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1014 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1015 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1016 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1020 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1021 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1022 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1023 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1027 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1028 | '(' declarator ')'
1033 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1034 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1041 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1042 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1043 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1044 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1045 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1046 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1047 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1048 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1049 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1050 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1051 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1052 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1053 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1054 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1056 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1057 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1058 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1059 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1060 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1061 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1062 The parser therefore prints
1065 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1068 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1069 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1076 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1077 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1078 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1079 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1080 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1081 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1082 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1083 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1084 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1085 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1091 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1092 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1093 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1094 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1099 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1100 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1105 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1109 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1117 with an accompanying forward declaration
1118 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1122 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1123 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1128 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1129 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1132 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1135 Bison requires that all of the
1136 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1137 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1138 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1139 the offending merge.
1141 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1142 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1144 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1145 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1146 the associated reduction.
1147 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1148 action in a GLR parser.
1151 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1153 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1155 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1156 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1157 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1158 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1159 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1160 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1161 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1162 influence syntax analysis.
1163 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1166 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1167 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1168 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1169 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1170 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1171 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1172 future versions of Bison.
1173 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1174 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1175 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1178 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1179 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1180 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1181 initiate error recovery.
1182 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1183 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1184 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1185 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1187 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1188 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1190 @node Compiler Requirements
1191 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1192 @cindex @code{inline}
1193 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1195 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1196 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1197 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1198 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1199 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1200 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1209 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1213 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1214 && ! defined inline)
1223 @cindex textual location
1224 @cindex location, textual
1226 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1227 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1228 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1229 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1231 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1232 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1233 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1234 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1237 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1238 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1239 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1242 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1243 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1244 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1245 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1246 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1247 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1248 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1251 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1252 @cindex Bison parser
1253 @cindex Bison utility
1254 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1257 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1258 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1259 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1260 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1261 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1262 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1263 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1266 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1267 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1268 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1271 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1272 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1273 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1274 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1275 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1276 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1277 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1279 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1280 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1281 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1282 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1283 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1284 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1285 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1286 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1287 C-Language Interface}.
1289 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1290 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1291 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1292 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1293 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1294 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1295 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1296 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1297 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1298 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1299 anything other than their usual meanings.
1301 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1302 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1303 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1304 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1305 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1306 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1307 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1308 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1309 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1312 @section Stages in Using Bison
1313 @cindex stages in using Bison
1316 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1317 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1321 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1322 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1323 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1324 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1325 sequence of C statements.
1328 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1329 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1330 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1331 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1334 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1337 Write error-reporting routines.
1340 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1341 must follow these steps:
1345 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1348 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1351 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1354 @node Grammar Layout
1355 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1356 @cindex grammar file
1358 @cindex format of grammar file
1359 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1361 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1362 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1369 @var{Bison declarations}
1378 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1379 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1381 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1382 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1383 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1384 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1385 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1386 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1388 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1389 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1390 semantic values of various symbols.
1392 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1395 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1396 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1397 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1401 @cindex simple examples
1402 @cindex examples, simple
1404 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1405 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1406 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1407 and a multi-function calculator. All
1408 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1410 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1411 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1412 source file to try them.
1415 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1416 a first example with no operator precedence.
1417 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1418 Operator precedence is introduced.
1419 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1420 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1421 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1422 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1423 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1427 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1428 @cindex reverse polish notation
1429 @cindex polish notation calculator
1430 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1431 @cindex calculator, simple
1433 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1434 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1435 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1436 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1438 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1439 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1442 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1443 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1444 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1445 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1446 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1447 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1448 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1451 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1452 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1454 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1455 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1458 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1461 #define YYSTYPE double
1464 void yyerror (char const *);
1469 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1472 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1473 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1475 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1476 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1477 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1478 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1479 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1480 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1481 which is a floating point number.
1483 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1484 function @code{pow}.
1486 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1487 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1488 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1489 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1492 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1493 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1494 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1495 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1496 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1497 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1498 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1499 type for numeric constants.
1502 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1504 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1517 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1524 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1525 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1526 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1527 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1528 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1529 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1535 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1536 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1537 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1538 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1539 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1542 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1543 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1544 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1546 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1547 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1548 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1549 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1550 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1551 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1560 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1562 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1571 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1572 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1573 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1574 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1575 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1577 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1578 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1579 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1580 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1581 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1582 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1584 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1585 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1586 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1587 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1590 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1591 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1592 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1595 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1597 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1602 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1606 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1607 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1608 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1609 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1610 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1611 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1612 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1614 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1615 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1616 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1617 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1618 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1621 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1623 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1624 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1625 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1626 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1631 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1632 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1637 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1638 equally well have written them separately:
1642 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1643 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1647 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1648 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1649 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1650 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1651 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1652 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1653 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1654 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1656 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1657 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1658 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1660 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1661 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1665 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1669 means the same thing as this:
1674 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1680 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1683 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1684 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1685 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1687 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1688 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1689 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1690 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1692 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1694 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1695 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1696 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1697 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1699 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1700 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1701 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1702 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1703 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1704 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1705 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1706 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1707 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1709 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1710 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1711 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1712 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1713 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1715 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1716 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1718 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1722 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1723 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1724 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1725 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1736 /* Skip white space. */
1737 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1741 /* Process numbers. */
1742 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1745 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1750 /* Return end-of-input. */
1753 /* Return a single char. */
1760 @subsection The Controlling Function
1761 @cindex controlling function
1762 @cindex main function in simple example
1764 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1765 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1766 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1779 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1780 @cindex error reporting routine
1782 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1783 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1784 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1785 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1786 here is the definition we will use:
1794 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1796 yyerror (char const *s)
1798 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1803 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1804 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1805 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1806 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1807 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1808 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1810 @node Rpcalc Generate
1811 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1812 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1814 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1815 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1816 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1817 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1818 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1819 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1821 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1822 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1824 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1825 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1832 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1833 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1834 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1835 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1836 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1837 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1838 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1840 @node Rpcalc Compile
1841 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1842 @cindex compiling the parser
1844 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1848 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1850 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1854 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1855 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1856 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1860 # @r{List files again.}
1862 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1866 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1867 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1873 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1875 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1879 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1881 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1886 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1887 @cindex infix notation calculator
1889 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1891 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1892 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1893 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1894 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1897 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1901 #define YYSTYPE double
1905 void yyerror (char const *);
1910 /* Bison declarations. */
1914 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1915 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1918 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1929 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1936 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1937 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1938 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1939 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1940 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1941 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1942 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1949 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1952 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1954 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1955 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1956 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1957 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1958 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1959 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1962 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1963 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1964 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1965 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1966 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1969 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1970 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1971 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1972 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1973 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1975 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1980 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1988 @node Simple Error Recovery
1989 @section Simple Error Recovery
1990 @cindex error recovery, simple
1992 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1993 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1994 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1995 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1996 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1997 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1999 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2000 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2001 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2007 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2008 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2013 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2014 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2015 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2016 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2017 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2018 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2019 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2020 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2023 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2024 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2025 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2026 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2027 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2028 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2031 @node Location Tracking Calc
2032 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2033 @cindex location tracking calculator
2034 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2035 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2037 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2038 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2039 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2040 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2044 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2045 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2046 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2049 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2050 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2052 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2053 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2056 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2062 void yyerror (char const *);
2065 /* Bison declarations. */
2073 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2077 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2078 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2079 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2080 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2081 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2082 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2083 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2087 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2089 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2090 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2091 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2092 from the new information.
2094 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2095 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2108 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2115 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2116 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2117 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2127 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2128 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2129 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2134 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2135 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2136 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2140 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2141 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2142 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2144 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2145 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2146 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2147 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2148 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2149 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2153 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2155 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2156 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2157 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2160 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2161 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2172 /* Skip white space. */
2173 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2174 ++yylloc.last_column;
2179 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2180 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2184 /* Process numbers. */
2188 ++yylloc.last_column;
2189 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2191 ++yylloc.last_column;
2192 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2199 /* Return end-of-input. */
2204 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2208 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2211 ++yylloc.last_column;
2217 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2218 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2219 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2220 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2222 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2223 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2224 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2225 controlling function:
2232 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2233 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2239 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2240 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2241 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2243 @node Multi-function Calc
2244 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2245 @cindex multi-function calculator
2246 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2247 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2249 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2250 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2251 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2252 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2253 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2255 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2256 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2257 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2258 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2259 functions whose syntax has this form:
2262 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2266 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2267 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2268 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2272 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2276 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2282 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2287 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2290 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2291 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2292 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2295 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2296 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2298 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2300 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2304 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2305 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2307 void yyerror (char const *);
2313 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2314 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2317 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2318 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2325 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2326 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2330 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2331 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2332 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2334 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2335 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2336 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2337 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2339 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2340 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2341 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2342 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2343 between angle brackets).
2345 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2346 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2347 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2348 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2349 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2350 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2353 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2355 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2356 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2357 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2359 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2361 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2372 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2373 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2380 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2381 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2382 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2383 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2384 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2385 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2386 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2387 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2388 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2389 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2392 /* End of grammar. */
2396 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2397 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2398 @cindex symbol table example
2400 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2401 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2402 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2403 requires some additional C functions for support.
2405 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2406 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2407 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2409 @comment file: calc.h
2412 /* Function type. */
2413 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2417 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2420 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2421 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2424 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2425 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2427 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2432 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2434 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2435 extern symrec *sym_table;
2437 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2438 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2442 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2443 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2444 @code{init_table} as well:
2446 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2451 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2453 yyerror (char const *s)
2463 double (*fnct) (double);
2468 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2481 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2486 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2491 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2493 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2494 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2509 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2510 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2512 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2513 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2514 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2515 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2516 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2517 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2519 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2521 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2522 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2526 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2528 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2529 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2530 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2531 ptr->type = sym_type;
2532 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2533 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2541 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2544 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2545 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2546 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2553 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2554 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2555 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2556 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2558 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2559 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2560 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2561 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2562 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2563 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2565 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2566 operators in @code{yylex}.
2568 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2580 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2581 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2589 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2590 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2593 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2599 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2602 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2603 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2604 static size_t length = 40;
2605 static char *symbuf = 0;
2611 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2617 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2621 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2623 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2625 /* Get another character. */
2630 while (isalnum (c));
2637 s = getsym (symbuf);
2639 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2644 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2650 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2651 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2652 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2654 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2657 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2659 yyerror (char const *s)
2661 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2667 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2670 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2671 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2672 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2680 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2681 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2682 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2690 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2693 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2694 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2695 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2698 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2699 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2703 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2705 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2706 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2708 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2709 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2712 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2713 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2714 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2715 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2716 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2717 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2718 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2719 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2720 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2723 @node Grammar Outline
2724 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2726 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2727 appropriate delimiters:
2734 @var{Bison declarations}
2743 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2744 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2745 continues until end of line.
2748 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2749 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2750 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2751 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2752 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2756 @subsection The prologue
2757 @cindex declarations section
2759 @cindex declarations
2761 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2762 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2763 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2764 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2765 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2766 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2767 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2769 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2770 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2773 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2774 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2775 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2776 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2777 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2778 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2779 @code{%union} declaration.
2790 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2794 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2795 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2801 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2802 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2803 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2804 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2805 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2806 @code{#include} directives.
2808 @node Prologue Alternatives
2809 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2810 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2813 @findex %code requires
2814 @findex %code provides
2817 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2818 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2819 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2820 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2821 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2822 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2823 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2825 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2836 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2840 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2841 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2848 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2849 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2850 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2851 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2852 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2853 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2854 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2855 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2856 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2857 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2858 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2860 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2861 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2862 This behavior raises a few questions.
2863 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2864 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2865 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2866 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2867 This behavior is not intuitive.
2869 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2870 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2871 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2872 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2879 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2880 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2883 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2884 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2896 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2900 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2901 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2902 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2909 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2910 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2911 explicit which kind you intend.
2912 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2914 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2915 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2916 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2917 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2918 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2919 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2920 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2921 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2922 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2925 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2926 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2928 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2946 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2952 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2953 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2966 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2967 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2968 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2976 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2977 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2978 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2979 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2980 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2981 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2983 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2984 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2985 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2986 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2987 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2988 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2989 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2990 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2991 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2992 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2993 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2996 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2997 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2998 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2999 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3000 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3001 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3002 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3003 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3004 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3005 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3023 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3029 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3030 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3043 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3049 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3050 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3058 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3059 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3060 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3063 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3064 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3065 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3066 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3067 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3068 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3071 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3072 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3073 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3074 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3076 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3077 organize your grammar file.
3078 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3083 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3084 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3085 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3086 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3090 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3091 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3092 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3093 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3098 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3099 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3101 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3103 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3104 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3105 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3106 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3108 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3109 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3110 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3111 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3112 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3113 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3114 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3115 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3118 @node Bison Declarations
3119 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3120 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3121 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3123 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3124 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3125 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3126 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3129 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3130 @cindex grammar rules section
3131 @cindex rules section for grammar
3133 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3134 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3136 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3137 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3138 if it is the first thing in the file.
3141 @subsection The epilogue
3142 @cindex additional C code section
3144 @cindex C code, section for additional
3146 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3147 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3148 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3149 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3150 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3151 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3152 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3153 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3154 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3155 C-Language Interface}.
3157 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3158 from the grammar rules.
3160 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3161 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3162 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3163 of the grammar file.
3166 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3167 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3168 @cindex terminal symbol
3172 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3175 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3176 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3177 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3178 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3179 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3180 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3181 the symbol to stand for it.
3183 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3184 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3185 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3187 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3188 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3189 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3190 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3191 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3192 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3193 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3195 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3199 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3200 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3201 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3202 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3205 @cindex character token
3206 @cindex literal token
3207 @cindex single-character literal
3208 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3209 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3210 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3211 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3212 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3213 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3214 ,Operator Precedence}).
3216 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3217 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3218 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3219 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3220 your program will confuse other readers.
3222 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3223 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3224 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3225 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3226 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3227 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3231 @cindex string token
3232 @cindex literal string token
3233 @cindex multicharacter literal
3234 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3235 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3236 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3237 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3238 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3240 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3241 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3242 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3243 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3244 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3246 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3248 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3249 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3250 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3251 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3252 read your program will be confused.
3254 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3255 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3256 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3257 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3258 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3259 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3262 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3263 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3264 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3266 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3267 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3268 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3269 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3270 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3271 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3272 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3273 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3274 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3275 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3276 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3277 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3279 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3280 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3281 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3282 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3283 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3285 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3286 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3287 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3288 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3289 characters in the following C-language string:
3292 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3295 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3296 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3297 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3298 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3299 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3300 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3301 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3302 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3303 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3304 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3307 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3308 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3309 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3310 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3311 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3314 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3316 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3317 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3319 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3323 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3328 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3329 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3330 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3341 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3342 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3344 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3345 extra white space as you wish.
3347 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3348 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3351 @{@var{C statements}@}
3356 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3357 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3358 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3359 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3360 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3361 compiler can check it.
3363 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3364 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3365 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3366 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3367 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3368 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3369 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3370 character constants.
3372 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3376 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3377 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3382 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3383 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3390 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3392 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3393 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3394 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3413 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3417 @section Recursive Rules
3418 @cindex recursive rule
3420 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3421 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3422 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3423 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3424 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3435 @cindex left recursion
3436 @cindex right recursion
3438 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3439 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3440 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3452 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3453 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3454 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3455 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3456 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3457 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3458 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3461 @cindex mutual recursion
3462 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3463 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3464 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3473 | primary '+' primary
3486 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3490 @section Defining Language Semantics
3491 @cindex defining language semantics
3492 @cindex language semantics, defining
3494 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3495 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3496 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3498 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3499 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3500 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3501 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3504 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3505 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3506 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3507 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3508 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3509 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3510 action in the middle of a rule.
3514 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3515 @cindex semantic value type
3516 @cindex value type, semantic
3517 @cindex data types of semantic values
3518 @cindex default data type
3520 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3521 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3522 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3523 Notation Calculator}).
3525 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3526 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3527 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3530 #define YYSTYPE double
3534 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3535 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3536 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3537 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3539 @node Multiple Types
3540 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3542 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3543 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3544 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3545 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3548 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3549 requires you to do two things:
3553 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3554 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3555 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3556 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3560 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3561 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3562 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3563 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3564 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3573 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3575 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3576 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3577 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3578 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3580 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3581 placed at any position in the rule;
3582 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3583 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3584 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3585 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3587 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3588 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3589 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3590 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3591 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3592 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3593 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3594 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3595 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3596 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3599 Here is a typical example:
3605 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3609 Or, in terms of named references:
3615 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3620 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3621 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3622 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3623 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3624 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3625 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3627 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3628 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3629 referred to as @code{$2}.
3631 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3632 references construct.
3634 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3635 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3636 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3637 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3638 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3642 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3646 @cindex default action
3647 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3648 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3649 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3650 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3651 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3652 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3654 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3655 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3656 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3657 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3658 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3663 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3664 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3670 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3675 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3676 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3677 definition of @code{foo}.
3680 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3681 any, from a semantic action.
3682 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3683 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3686 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3687 @cindex action data types
3688 @cindex data types in actions
3690 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3691 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3693 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3694 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3695 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3696 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3697 in the rule. In this example,
3703 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3708 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3709 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3710 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3711 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3713 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3714 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3715 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3727 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3728 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3730 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3731 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3732 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3733 @cindex mid-rule actions
3735 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3736 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3737 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3739 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3740 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3741 it is run before they are parsed.
3743 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3744 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3745 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3746 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3749 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3750 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3751 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3752 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3753 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3754 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3756 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3757 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3758 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3759 at the end of the rule.
3761 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3762 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3763 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3764 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3765 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3766 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3772 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3774 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3779 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3780 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3781 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3782 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3783 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3784 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3785 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3786 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3788 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3789 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3790 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3791 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3792 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3795 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3796 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3797 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3798 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3799 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3801 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3802 Discarded Symbols}).
3803 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3804 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3806 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3807 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3812 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3826 $$ = push_context ();
3827 declare_variable ($3);
3834 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3835 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3836 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3838 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3839 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3840 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3841 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3842 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3848 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3849 | '@{' statements '@}'
3855 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3860 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3861 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3864 | '@{' statements '@}'
3870 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3871 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3872 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3873 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3874 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3875 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3877 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3878 actions into the two rules, like this:
3883 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3884 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3885 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3886 '@{' statements '@}'
3892 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3893 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3895 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3896 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3897 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3902 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3903 declarations statements '@}'
3904 | '@{' statements '@}'
3910 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3911 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3913 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3914 serves as a subroutine:
3919 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3925 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3926 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
3932 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3933 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3935 @node Tracking Locations
3936 @section Tracking Locations
3938 @cindex textual location
3939 @cindex location, textual
3941 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3942 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3943 especially symbol locations.
3945 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3946 actions to take when rules are matched.
3949 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3950 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3951 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3955 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3956 @cindex data type of locations
3957 @cindex default location type
3959 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3960 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3962 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3963 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3964 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3965 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3969 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3978 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3979 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3980 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3981 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3982 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3984 @node Actions and Locations
3985 @subsection Actions and Locations
3986 @cindex location actions
3987 @cindex actions, location
3990 @vindex @@@var{name}
3991 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3993 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3994 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3996 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3997 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3998 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3999 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4000 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4003 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4004 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4005 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4006 references construct.
4008 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4016 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4017 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4018 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4019 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4026 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4027 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4028 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4034 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4035 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4036 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4039 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4040 example above simply rewrites this way:
4054 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4055 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4056 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4063 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4064 from a semantic action.
4065 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4066 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4068 @node Location Default Action
4069 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4070 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4071 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4073 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4074 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4075 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4076 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4077 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4078 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4079 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4080 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4083 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4084 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4086 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4087 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4088 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4089 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4090 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4091 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4092 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4093 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4094 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4095 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4097 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4101 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4105 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4106 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4107 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4108 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4112 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4113 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4114 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4115 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4122 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4123 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4124 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4126 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4130 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4131 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4134 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4135 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4136 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4137 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4140 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4141 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4142 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4143 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4146 @node Named References
4147 @section Named References
4148 @cindex named references
4150 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4151 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4152 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4153 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4154 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4155 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4157 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4158 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4159 used as named references. For example:
4163 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4164 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4169 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4173 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4174 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4179 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4185 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4188 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4191 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4196 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4197 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4198 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4201 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4202 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4207 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4208 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4209 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4212 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4213 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4219 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4220 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4223 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4224 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4228 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4229 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4230 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4231 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4232 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4233 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4234 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4236 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4240 @section Bison Declarations
4241 @cindex declarations, Bison
4242 @cindex Bison declarations
4244 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4245 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4248 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4249 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4250 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4251 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4253 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4254 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4255 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4256 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4259 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4260 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4261 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4262 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4263 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4264 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4265 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4266 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4267 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4268 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4269 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4270 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4271 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4272 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4273 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4277 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4278 @cindex version requirement
4279 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4282 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4283 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4287 %require "@var{version}"
4291 @subsection Token Type Names
4292 @cindex declaring token type names
4293 @cindex token type names, declaring
4294 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4297 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4303 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4304 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4305 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4307 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4308 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4309 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4312 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4313 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4314 following the token name:
4318 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4322 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4323 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4324 with each other or with normal characters.
4326 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4327 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4328 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4329 Than One Value Type}).
4335 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4339 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4343 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4344 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4345 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4352 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4353 equivalent literal string tokens:
4356 %token <operator> OR "||"
4357 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4362 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4363 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4364 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4365 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4366 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4367 the literal string instead of the token name.
4369 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4370 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4374 %token END 0 "end of file"
4377 @node Precedence Decl
4378 @subsection Operator Precedence
4379 @cindex precedence declarations
4380 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4381 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4383 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4384 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4385 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4386 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4387 operator precedence.
4389 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4390 @code{%token}: either
4393 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4400 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4403 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4404 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4405 all the @var{symbols}:
4409 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4410 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4411 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4412 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4413 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4414 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4415 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4416 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4417 considered a syntax error.
4420 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4421 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4422 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4423 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4424 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4427 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4428 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4429 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4430 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4435 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4436 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4440 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4441 @cindex declaring value types
4442 @cindex value types, declaring
4445 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4446 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4447 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4462 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4463 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4464 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4465 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4467 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4468 @code{union}. For example:
4480 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4481 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4484 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4485 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4486 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4488 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4489 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4491 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4492 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4493 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4494 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4502 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4507 and then your grammar can use the following
4508 instead of @code{%union}:
4521 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4522 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4523 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4527 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4528 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4529 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4532 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4536 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4537 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4538 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4539 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4540 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4543 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4544 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4545 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4546 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4548 @node Initial Action Decl
4549 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4550 @findex %initial-action
4552 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4553 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4556 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4557 @findex %initial-action
4558 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4559 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4560 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4561 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4564 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4567 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4570 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4575 @node Destructor Decl
4576 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4577 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4581 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4582 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4583 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4584 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4585 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4586 must discard the start symbol.
4588 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4589 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4590 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4591 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4593 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4594 symbol is automatically discarded.
4596 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4598 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4599 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4600 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4601 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4602 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4605 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4606 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4607 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4608 tag among @var{symbols}.
4609 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4610 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4611 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4613 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4614 (These default forms are experimental.
4615 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4617 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4618 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4619 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4620 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4622 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4623 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4624 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4625 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4626 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4633 %union @{ char *string; @}
4634 %token <string> STRING1
4635 %token <string> STRING2
4636 %type <string> string1
4637 %type <string> string2
4638 %union @{ char character; @}
4639 %token <character> CHR
4640 %type <character> chr
4643 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4644 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4645 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4646 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4650 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4651 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4652 to @code{free} by default.
4653 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4654 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4655 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4656 @code{free} only once.
4657 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4658 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4660 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4661 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4662 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4663 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4664 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4665 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4666 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4667 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4668 reference it in your grammar.
4669 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4670 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4676 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4677 @cindex mid-rule actions
4678 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4679 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4680 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4681 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4682 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4683 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4684 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4685 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4689 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4690 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4691 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4696 @cindex discarded symbols
4697 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4701 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4703 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4705 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4706 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4708 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4709 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4712 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4715 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4716 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4719 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4720 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4721 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4725 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4726 @cindex printing semantic values
4730 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4731 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4732 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4733 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4735 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4736 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4737 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4739 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4742 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4743 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4744 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4745 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4746 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4747 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4748 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4751 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4752 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4753 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4754 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4762 %union @{ char *string; @}
4763 %token <string> STRING1
4764 %token <string> STRING2
4765 %type <string> string1
4766 %type <string> string2
4767 %union @{ char character; @}
4768 %token <character> CHR
4769 %type <character> chr
4772 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4773 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4774 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4775 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4779 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4780 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4781 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4782 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4783 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4784 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4785 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4789 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4790 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4791 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4792 @cindex warnings, preventing
4793 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4797 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4798 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4799 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4800 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4801 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4802 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4804 The declaration looks like this:
4810 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4811 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4812 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4813 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4815 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4816 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4817 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4818 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4819 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4820 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4821 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4827 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4831 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4832 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4833 print the number of conflicts.
4836 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4837 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4838 go back to the beginning.
4841 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4842 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4843 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4846 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4847 but will keep silent otherwise.
4850 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4851 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4852 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4853 @cindex default start symbol
4856 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4857 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4858 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4865 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4866 @cindex reentrant parser
4868 @findex %define api.pure
4870 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4871 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4872 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4873 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4874 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4875 program must be called only within interlocks.
4877 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4878 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4879 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4880 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4881 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4883 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4884 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4885 reentrant. It looks like this:
4888 %define api.pure full
4891 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4892 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4893 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4894 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4895 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4896 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4897 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4898 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4899 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4901 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4902 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4906 @subsection A Push Parser
4909 @findex %define api.push-pull
4911 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4912 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4914 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4915 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4916 each time a new token is made available.
4918 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4919 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4920 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4921 within a certain time period.
4923 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4924 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4925 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4928 %define api.push-pull push
4931 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4932 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4933 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4934 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4935 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4938 %define api.pure full
4939 %define api.push-pull push
4942 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4943 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4944 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4945 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4947 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4948 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4949 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4950 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4951 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4952 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4953 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4954 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4958 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4960 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4961 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4962 yypstate_delete (ps);
4965 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4966 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4967 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4968 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4969 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4970 example would thus look like this:
4975 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4978 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4979 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4980 yypstate_delete (ps);
4983 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4984 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4986 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4987 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4988 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4989 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4990 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4991 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4992 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4993 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4994 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4995 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4996 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4997 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4998 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4999 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5000 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5001 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5002 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5006 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5007 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5008 yypstate_delete (ps);
5011 Adding the @code{%define api.pure full} declaration does exactly the same thing
5012 to the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5013 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
5016 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5017 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5018 @cindex declaration summary
5019 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5021 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5023 @deffn {Directive} %union
5024 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5025 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5028 @deffn {Directive} %token
5029 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5030 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5033 @deffn {Directive} %right
5034 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5035 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5038 @deffn {Directive} %left
5039 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5040 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5043 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5044 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5045 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5046 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5050 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5051 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5052 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5056 @deffn {Directive} %type
5057 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5058 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5061 @deffn {Directive} %start
5062 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5066 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5067 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5068 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5074 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5077 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5078 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5080 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5081 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5082 @xref{%code Summary}.
5085 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5086 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or
5087 @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}, see
5088 @ref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 if it is
5089 not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
5090 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5093 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5094 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5095 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5096 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5099 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5100 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5101 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5102 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5103 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5105 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5106 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5107 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5108 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5109 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5110 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5111 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5112 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5113 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5114 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5116 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5117 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5118 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5120 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5121 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5122 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5124 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5125 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5126 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5127 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5128 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5130 @findex %code requires
5131 @findex %code provides
5132 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5133 header also contains their code.
5134 @xref{%code Summary}.
5136 @cindex Header guard
5137 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5138 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5139 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5140 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5141 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5144 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5145 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5147 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5148 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5150 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5154 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5155 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5158 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5159 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5160 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5163 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5164 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5165 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5168 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5169 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5170 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5171 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5173 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5177 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5178 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5179 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5180 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5181 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5182 accurate syntax error messages.
5186 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5187 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5188 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5193 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5194 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5195 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5196 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5197 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5198 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5199 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5203 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5204 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5207 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5208 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5209 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5213 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5214 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5215 Require a Version of Bison}.
5218 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5219 Specify the skeleton to use.
5221 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5222 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5223 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5224 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5226 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5227 file in the Bison installation directory.
5228 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5229 directory of the grammar file.
5230 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5233 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5234 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5235 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5236 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5237 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5238 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5239 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5242 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5243 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5244 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5245 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5246 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5247 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5248 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5251 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5252 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5253 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5257 The highest token number, plus one.
5259 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5261 The number of grammar rules,
5263 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5267 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5268 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5269 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5270 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5274 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5275 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5276 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5280 @node %define Summary
5281 @subsection %define Summary
5283 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5284 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5285 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5286 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5287 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5288 @code{%define} directive:
5290 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5291 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5292 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5293 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5295 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5296 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5297 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5298 to specifying @code{""}.
5300 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5301 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5302 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5305 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5306 @code{%define} accepts.
5308 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5309 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5313 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5315 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5316 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5318 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5320 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5321 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5324 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5325 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5326 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5327 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5328 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5329 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5332 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5333 @item @code{api.location.type}
5334 @findex %define api.location.type
5337 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5339 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5340 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5342 @item Accepted Values: String
5344 @item Default Value: none
5346 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.7
5349 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5350 @item @code{api.prefix}
5351 @findex %define api.prefix
5354 @item Language(s): All
5356 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5357 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5359 @item Accepted Values: String
5361 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5363 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5366 @c ================================================== api.pure
5367 @item @code{api.pure}
5368 @findex %define api.pure
5371 @item Language(s): C
5373 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5374 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5376 @item Accepted Values: @code{true}, @code{false}, @code{full}
5378 The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying @code{true}, as is
5379 the case for Boolean values.
5381 When @code{%define api.pure full} is used, the parser is made reentrant. This
5382 changes the signature for yylex (@pxref{Pure Calling}), and also that of
5383 yyerror when the tracking of locations has been activated, as shown below.
5385 The @code{true} value is very similar to the @code{full} value, the only
5386 difference is in the signature of @code{yyerror} on Yacc parsers without
5387 @code{%parse-param}, for historical reasons.
5389 I.e., if @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5393 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5394 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5397 But if @samp{%locations %define api.pure %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is
5398 used, then both parsers have the same signature:
5401 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
5404 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5405 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}})
5407 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5409 @item History: the @code{full} value was introduced in Bison 2.7
5412 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5414 @item @code{api.push-pull}
5415 @findex %define api.push-pull
5418 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5420 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5421 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5422 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5423 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5425 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5427 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5430 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5432 @item @code{lr.default-reductions}
5433 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5436 @item Language(s): all
5438 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5439 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5440 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5441 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5443 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5444 @item Default Value:
5446 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5447 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5451 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5453 @item @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states}
5454 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5457 @item Language(s): all
5458 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5459 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5460 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5461 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5464 @c ================================================== lr.type
5466 @item @code{lr.type}
5467 @findex %define lr.type
5470 @item Language(s): all
5472 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5473 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5474 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5476 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5478 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5481 @c ================================================== namespace
5483 @item @code{namespace}
5484 @findex %define namespace
5487 @item Languages(s): C++
5489 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5490 For example, if you specify:
5493 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5496 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5499 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5502 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5503 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5506 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5512 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5513 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5514 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5516 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5518 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5519 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5520 lexical analyzer function.
5521 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5522 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5523 lexical analyzer function.
5524 For example, if you specify:
5527 %define namespace "foo"
5528 %name-prefix "bar::"
5531 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5535 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5536 @item @code{parse.lac}
5537 @findex %define parse.lac
5540 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5542 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5543 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5544 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5545 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5551 @subsection %code Summary
5555 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5556 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5557 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5558 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5559 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5560 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5561 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5562 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5564 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5565 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5566 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5567 in the parser implementation.
5569 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5570 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5571 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5573 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5576 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5577 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5578 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5579 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5580 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5581 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5585 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5586 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5587 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5590 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5591 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5595 @findex %code requires
5598 @item Language(s): C, C++
5600 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5601 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5602 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5603 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5604 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5606 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5607 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5612 @findex %code provides
5615 @item Language(s): C, C++
5617 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5618 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5620 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5621 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5629 @item Language(s): C, C++
5631 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5632 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5633 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5634 parser implementation file. For example:
5643 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5647 @findex %code imports
5650 @item Language(s): Java
5652 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5654 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5655 before any class definitions.
5659 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5660 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5661 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5662 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5665 @node Multiple Parsers
5666 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5668 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5669 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
5670 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
5671 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
5672 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
5673 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
5674 exported in the generated header.
5676 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
5677 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
5678 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
5679 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
5680 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
5681 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
5682 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
5683 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
5684 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
5686 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
5687 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
5688 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
5689 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
5690 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
5691 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
5692 specifically --- more about this below.
5694 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
5695 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
5698 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
5699 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
5700 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5701 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
5704 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
5705 #define yyparse cparse
5706 #define yylval clval
5712 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
5713 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
5714 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
5716 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
5720 extern CSTYPE clval;
5724 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
5725 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
5726 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
5729 /* Enabling traces. */
5731 # if defined YYDEBUG
5748 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
5749 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
5750 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
5753 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5754 @cindex C-language interface
5757 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5758 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5759 functions that it needs to use.
5761 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5762 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5763 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5764 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5767 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5768 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5769 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5770 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5771 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5772 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5774 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5775 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5776 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5780 @node Parser Function
5781 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5784 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5785 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5786 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5787 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5788 without reading further.
5791 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5792 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5793 is due to end-of-input).
5795 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5796 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5799 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5802 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5807 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5812 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5815 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5816 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5817 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5819 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5820 @findex %parse-param
5821 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5822 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5823 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5824 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5825 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5828 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5831 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5832 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5836 Then call the parser like this:
5840 int nastiness, randomness;
5841 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5842 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5848 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5851 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5855 Using the following:
5857 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5860 Results in these signatures:
5862 void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
5863 int yyparse (int *randomness);
5867 Or, if both @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure})
5868 and @code{%locations} are used:
5871 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
5872 int yyparse (int *randomness);
5875 @node Push Parser Function
5876 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5877 @findex yypush_parse
5879 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5880 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5882 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5883 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5884 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5885 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5887 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5888 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
5889 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
5890 required to finish parsing the grammar.
5893 @node Pull Parser Function
5894 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5895 @findex yypull_parse
5897 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5898 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5900 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5901 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5902 declaration is used.
5903 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5905 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5906 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5909 @node Parser Create Function
5910 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5911 @findex yypstate_new
5913 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5914 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5916 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5917 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5918 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5919 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5921 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
5922 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5923 or 0 if no memory was available.
5924 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5928 @node Parser Delete Function
5929 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5930 @findex yypstate_delete
5932 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5933 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5935 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5936 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5937 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5938 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5940 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5941 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5942 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5946 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5948 @cindex lexical analyzer
5950 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5951 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5952 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5953 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5955 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5956 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5957 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5958 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5959 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5960 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5961 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5965 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5966 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5967 of the token it has read.
5968 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5969 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5971 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5972 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5975 @node Calling Convention
5976 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5978 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5979 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5980 signifies end-of-input.
5982 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5983 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5984 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5985 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5987 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5988 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5989 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5990 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5991 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5992 signifies end-of-input.
5994 Here is an example showing these things:
6001 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6004 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6005 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6007 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6013 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6014 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6016 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6017 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6021 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6022 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6023 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6024 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6027 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6028 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6029 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6030 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6031 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6034 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6035 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6036 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6037 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6040 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6043 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6044 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6045 strlen (token_buffer))
6046 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6047 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6052 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6053 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6057 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6060 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6061 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6062 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6063 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6069 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6070 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6075 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6076 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6077 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6078 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6079 declaration looks like this:
6092 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6097 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6098 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6103 @node Token Locations
6104 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6107 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6108 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6109 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6110 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6111 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6112 data in that variable.
6114 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6115 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6116 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6117 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6118 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6121 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6124 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6126 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure full} to request a
6127 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6128 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6129 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6130 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6131 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6136 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6139 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6140 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6145 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6146 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6147 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6151 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
6152 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6155 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
6157 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
6158 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
6165 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6169 results in the following signature:
6172 int yylex (int *nastiness);
6176 If @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure}) is added:
6179 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
6182 @node Error Reporting
6183 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6184 @cindex error reporting function
6187 @cindex syntax error
6189 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
6190 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6191 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6192 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6195 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6196 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6197 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6198 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6199 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6201 @findex %error-verbose
6202 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
6203 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6204 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6205 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6206 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6208 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6209 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6210 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6211 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6212 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6213 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6215 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6216 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6217 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6219 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6224 yyerror (char const *s)
6228 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6233 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6234 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6235 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6236 immediately return 1.
6238 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6239 an access to the current location. With @code{%define api.pure}, this is
6240 indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
6241 historical reasons, and this is the why @code{%define api.pure full} should be
6242 prefered over @code{%define api.pure}.
6244 When @code{%locations %define api.pure full} is used, @code{yyerror} has the
6245 following signature:
6248 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
6252 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6253 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6254 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6255 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6256 message is always passed last.
6258 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6259 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6260 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6264 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6265 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6266 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6267 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6269 @node Action Features
6270 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6271 @cindex summary, action features
6272 @cindex action features summary
6274 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6275 are useful in actions.
6277 @deffn {Variable} $$
6278 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6279 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6282 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6283 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6284 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6287 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6288 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6289 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6290 Types of Values in Actions}.
6293 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6294 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6295 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6296 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6299 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6300 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6301 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6304 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6305 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6306 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6309 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6311 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6312 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6313 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6314 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6315 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6316 going to be reduced by this rule.
6318 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6319 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6320 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6323 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6326 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6327 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6330 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6331 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6335 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6336 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6337 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6338 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6339 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6340 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6343 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6344 @findex YYRECOVERING
6345 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6346 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6347 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6350 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6351 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6352 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6353 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6354 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6356 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6359 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6360 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6362 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6364 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6367 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6368 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6369 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6370 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6373 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6374 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6375 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6376 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6378 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6381 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6382 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6383 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6384 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6386 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6391 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6392 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6395 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6399 @c int first_line, last_line;
6400 @c int first_column, last_column;
6404 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6405 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6407 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6408 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6409 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6412 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6415 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6417 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6418 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6422 @node Internationalization
6423 @section Parser Internationalization
6424 @cindex internationalization
6430 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6431 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6432 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6433 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6434 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6435 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6436 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6437 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6440 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6441 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6442 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6447 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6448 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6449 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6450 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6451 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6455 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6460 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6461 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6462 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6463 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6464 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6465 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6466 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6467 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6468 Bison-generated parser.
6471 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6472 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6473 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6477 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6480 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6481 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6482 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6486 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6487 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6488 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6491 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6497 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6501 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6507 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6508 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6509 @cindex algorithm of parser
6512 @cindex parser stack
6513 @cindex stack, parser
6515 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6516 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6517 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6519 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6520 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6523 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6524 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6525 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6526 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6527 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6528 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6529 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6531 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6538 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6539 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6542 expr: expr '*' expr;
6546 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6553 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6554 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6556 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6557 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6558 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6560 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6563 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6564 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6565 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6566 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6567 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6568 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6569 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6570 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6571 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6572 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6576 @section Lookahead Tokens
6577 @cindex lookahead token
6579 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6580 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6581 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6582 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6583 token in order to decide what to do.
6585 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6586 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6587 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6588 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6589 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6590 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6591 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6594 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6595 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6596 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6615 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6616 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6617 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6618 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6619 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6621 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6622 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6623 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6624 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6625 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6626 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6631 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6632 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6633 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6634 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6637 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6639 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6640 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6641 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6643 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6644 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6649 "if" expr "then" stmt
6650 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
6656 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
6657 specific keyword tokens.
6659 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6660 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6661 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6662 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6665 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6666 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6667 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6668 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6669 contrast it with the other alternative.
6671 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
6672 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6676 if x then if y then win; else lose;
6678 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
6681 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6682 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6683 making these two inputs equivalent:
6686 if x then if y then win; else lose;
6688 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
6691 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6692 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6693 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6694 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6695 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6696 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6697 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6698 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6700 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6701 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6702 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6703 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6705 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
6706 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
6707 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
6708 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
6709 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
6712 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6713 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6714 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6730 "if" expr "then" stmt
6731 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
6741 @section Operator Precedence
6742 @cindex operator precedence
6743 @cindex precedence of operators
6745 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6746 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6747 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6748 shift and when to reduce.
6751 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6752 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6753 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6754 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6755 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
6758 @node Why Precedence
6759 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6761 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6762 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6777 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6778 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6779 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6780 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6781 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6782 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6783 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6786 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6787 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6788 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6789 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6790 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6791 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6792 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6793 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6796 @cindex associativity
6797 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6798 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6799 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6800 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6801 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6802 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6803 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6804 makes right-associativity.
6806 @node Using Precedence
6807 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6812 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6813 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6814 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6815 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6816 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6817 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6818 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6821 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6822 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6823 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6824 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6825 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6827 @node Precedence Examples
6828 @subsection Precedence Examples
6830 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6838 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6839 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6840 declared with @code{'-'}:
6843 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
6848 @node How Precedence
6849 @subsection How Precedence Works
6851 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6852 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6853 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6854 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6855 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6856 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6858 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6859 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6860 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6861 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6862 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6863 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6864 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6867 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6868 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6871 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
6873 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
6874 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
6875 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
6876 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
6878 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
6879 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
6880 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
6881 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
6882 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
6883 instance as follows:
6892 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
6893 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
6894 use right associativity:
6897 %right "then" "else"
6900 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
6901 support for ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
6902 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
6903 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
6904 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
6905 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
6906 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
6908 @node Contextual Precedence
6909 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6910 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6911 @cindex unary operator precedence
6912 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6913 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6916 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6917 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6918 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6919 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6921 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6922 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6923 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6924 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6927 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6928 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6929 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6930 modifier's syntax is:
6933 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6937 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6938 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6939 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6940 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6941 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6943 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6944 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6945 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6955 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6963 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6968 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6969 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6970 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6971 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6973 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6974 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6975 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6976 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6978 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6979 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6980 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6981 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6982 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6983 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6985 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6986 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6990 @section Parser States
6991 @cindex finite-state machine
6992 @cindex parser state
6993 @cindex state (of parser)
6995 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6996 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6997 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6998 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6999 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7001 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7002 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7003 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7004 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7005 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7006 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7007 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7008 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7011 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7012 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7013 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7016 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7017 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7018 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7020 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7021 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7024 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7025 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7030 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7032 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7038 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7039 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7045 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7046 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7047 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7048 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7049 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7050 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7052 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7053 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7054 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7056 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7057 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7058 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7059 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7060 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7062 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7063 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7064 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7065 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7070 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7071 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7076 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7083 | sequence redirects
7097 | redirects redirect
7103 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7104 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7105 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7106 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7107 in infinitely many ways!
7109 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7110 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7111 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7112 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7114 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7125 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7133 | sequence redirects
7147 | redirects redirect
7152 Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7153 @samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7154 @samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7155 @code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7156 shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7159 To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7160 being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7162 To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7163 @code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7164 as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7165 @ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7166 relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7171 %nonassoc "sequence"
7176 | sequence word %prec "sequence"
7177 | sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7189 Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7190 rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7193 %right "word" "redirect"
7198 | sequence word %prec "word"
7199 | sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7204 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7205 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7206 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7208 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7214 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7217 | name_list ':' type
7233 | name ',' name_list
7238 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7239 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7240 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7241 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7245 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7247 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7248 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7249 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7251 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7252 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7253 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7254 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7255 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7256 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7257 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7260 @cindex canonical LR
7261 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7262 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7263 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7264 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7265 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7266 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7267 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7268 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7270 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7271 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7272 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7273 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7274 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7282 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7287 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7288 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7289 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7290 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7291 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7292 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7294 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7295 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
7296 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7297 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7298 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7299 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7304 | name_list ':' type
7312 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7313 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7318 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7319 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7320 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7321 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7322 Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
7323 the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
7324 sometimes contain incorrect information.
7326 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7327 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7328 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7329 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7331 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7332 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7335 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7336 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7337 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7338 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7341 @node LR Table Construction
7342 @subsection LR Table Construction
7343 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7346 @cindex canonical LR
7347 @findex %define lr.type
7349 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7350 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7351 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7352 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7355 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7356 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7357 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7358 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7361 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7362 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7363 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7366 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type} @var{TYPE}
7367 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7368 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7371 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7373 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7376 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7380 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7384 %define lr.type ielr
7387 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7388 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7389 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7390 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7391 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7392 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7393 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7394 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7395 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7396 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7398 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7399 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7400 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7401 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7407 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7410 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7412 @cindex GLR with LALR
7413 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7414 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7415 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7416 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7417 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7418 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7419 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7420 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7421 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7422 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7424 @item Malformed grammars.
7426 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7427 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7428 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7429 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7430 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7435 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7436 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7437 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7438 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7439 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7440 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7441 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7442 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7443 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7447 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7450 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7451 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7452 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7453 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7454 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7455 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7456 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7457 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7458 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7459 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7460 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7461 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7464 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7465 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7466 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7468 @node Default Reductions
7469 @subsection Default Reductions
7470 @cindex default reductions
7471 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7474 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7475 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7476 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7477 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7478 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7480 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7481 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7484 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7486 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7487 @cindex consistent states
7488 @cindex defaulted states
7489 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7490 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7491 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7492 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7493 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7494 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7495 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7496 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7497 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7498 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7499 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7501 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7502 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7503 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7504 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7505 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7506 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7507 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7508 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7509 should already be considered closed.
7511 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7513 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7514 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7515 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7516 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7517 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7518 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7519 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7520 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7521 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7525 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7526 @c sentence from being rejected.
7527 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7528 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7529 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7530 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7531 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7532 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7535 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7536 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7537 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7538 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7539 because the accept action ends the parse.
7541 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7542 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7543 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7544 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7545 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7546 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7547 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7548 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7549 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7550 split the parse instead.
7552 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7553 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7555 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions} @var{WHERE}
7556 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7557 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7559 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7560 @item @code{consistent}
7561 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7564 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7565 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7570 @findex %define parse.lac
7572 @cindex lookahead correction
7574 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7575 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7576 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7577 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7578 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7579 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7580 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7581 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7582 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7584 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7585 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7586 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7587 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7588 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7590 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7591 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7592 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7593 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7595 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac} @var{VALUE}
7596 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7598 @item @code{none} (default)
7601 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7602 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7606 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7607 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7608 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7609 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7610 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7611 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7612 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7613 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7614 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7615 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7618 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7619 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7620 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7621 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7622 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7623 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7624 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7625 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7626 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7627 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7629 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7630 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7631 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7632 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7633 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7634 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7635 language-recognition power.
7637 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7640 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7642 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7643 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7644 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7645 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7648 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7650 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7651 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7652 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7653 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7654 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7655 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7659 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7660 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7661 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7662 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7663 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7664 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7665 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7666 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7667 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7668 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7669 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7672 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7673 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7674 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7676 @node Unreachable States
7677 @subsection Unreachable States
7678 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7679 @cindex unreachable states
7681 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7682 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7683 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7684 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7686 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7687 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7688 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7689 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7691 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states} @var{VALUE}
7692 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7693 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7696 There are a few caveats to consider:
7699 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7701 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7702 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7703 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7704 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7705 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7706 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7708 @item Other useless states.
7710 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7711 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7712 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7713 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7714 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7715 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7716 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7719 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7720 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7722 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7723 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7724 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7726 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7727 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7728 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7729 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7730 context-free languages.
7731 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7732 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7733 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7734 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7735 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7736 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7737 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7738 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7740 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7741 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7742 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7743 parser uses the same basic
7744 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7745 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7746 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7747 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7749 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7750 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7751 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7752 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7753 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7755 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7756 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7757 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7758 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7759 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7760 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7761 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7762 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7763 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7764 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7765 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7768 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7769 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7770 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7771 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7772 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7773 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7774 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7775 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7776 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7777 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7778 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7779 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7781 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7782 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7783 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7785 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7786 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7787 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7788 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7789 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7790 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7791 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7792 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7793 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7794 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7795 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7796 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7798 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7801 @node Memory Management
7802 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7803 @cindex memory exhaustion
7804 @cindex memory management
7805 @cindex stack overflow
7806 @cindex parser stack overflow
7807 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7809 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7810 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7811 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7813 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7814 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7815 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7818 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7819 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7820 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7821 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7823 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7824 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7825 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7826 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7827 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7828 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7830 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7831 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7832 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7835 @cindex default stack limit
7836 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7840 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7841 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7842 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7843 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7844 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7846 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7848 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7849 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7850 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7851 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7852 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7853 this deficiency in a future release.
7855 @node Error Recovery
7856 @chapter Error Recovery
7857 @cindex error recovery
7858 @cindex recovery from errors
7860 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7861 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7862 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7865 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7866 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7867 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7868 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7869 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7870 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7871 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7874 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7875 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7876 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7877 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7878 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7879 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7891 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7892 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
7894 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7895 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7896 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7897 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7898 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
7899 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7900 applicable in the ordinary way.
7902 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7903 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7904 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7905 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7906 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
7907 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7908 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7909 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7910 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7911 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7912 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7913 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7915 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7916 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7917 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7920 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7923 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7924 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7925 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7926 spurious error message:
7936 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7937 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7938 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7939 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7940 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7941 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7942 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7945 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7946 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7947 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7948 error messages resume.
7950 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7951 as any other rules can.
7954 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7955 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7956 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7957 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7960 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7961 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7962 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7964 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7966 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7967 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7968 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7969 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7970 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7972 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7973 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7974 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7975 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7978 @node Context Dependency
7979 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7981 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7982 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7983 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7984 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7988 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7989 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7990 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7991 error recovery rules must be written.
7994 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7995 neither clean nor robust.)
7997 @node Semantic Tokens
7998 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8000 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8001 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8007 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8008 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8009 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8011 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8012 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8013 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8014 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8015 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8017 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8018 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8019 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8020 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8021 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8022 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8023 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8025 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8026 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8027 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8028 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8032 typedef int foo, bar;
8036 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8037 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8043 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8044 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8046 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8047 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8048 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8049 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8050 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8055 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8056 | declarator maybeasm
8062 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8063 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8069 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8070 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8071 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8073 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8074 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8075 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8076 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8077 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8078 the syntactic context.
8080 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8081 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8082 @cindex lexical tie-in
8084 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8085 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8088 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8089 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8090 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8091 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8092 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8099 void yyerror (char const *);
8108 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8109 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8110 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8124 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8125 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8126 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8128 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8129 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8130 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8133 @node Tie-in Recovery
8134 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8136 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8137 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8139 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8140 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8141 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8142 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8147 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8149 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8153 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8154 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8155 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8156 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8157 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8159 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8161 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8162 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8163 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8169 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8175 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8176 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8177 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8178 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8180 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8181 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8182 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8183 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8184 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8185 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8188 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8191 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8193 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8194 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8195 chapter explains how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8196 automaton, and how to enable and understand the parser run-time traces.
8199 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8200 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8201 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8202 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8206 @section Understanding Your Parser
8208 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8209 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8210 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8211 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8212 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8214 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8215 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8216 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8217 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8218 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8219 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8220 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8222 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8240 @command{bison} reports:
8243 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8244 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8245 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8246 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8247 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8250 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8251 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8252 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8253 interpretation is the same.
8256 @cindex token, useless
8257 @cindex useless token
8258 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8259 @cindex useless nonterminal
8260 @cindex rule, useless
8261 @cindex useless rule
8262 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8263 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8264 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8265 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8268 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8271 Terminals unused in grammar
8274 Rules useless in grammar
8279 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8282 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8283 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8284 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8285 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8289 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8304 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8308 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8321 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8326 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8332 @cindex pointed rule
8333 @cindex rule, pointed
8334 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8335 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8336 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8337 the location of the input cursor.
8342 0 $accept: . exp $end
8344 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8349 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8350 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8351 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8352 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8353 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8354 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8355 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8356 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8358 @cindex core, item set
8359 @cindex item set core
8360 @cindex kernel, item set
8361 @cindex item set core
8362 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8363 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8364 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8365 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8366 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8367 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8372 0 $accept: . exp $end
8373 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8379 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8385 In the state 1@dots{}
8392 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8396 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8397 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8398 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8399 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8404 0 $accept: exp . $end
8405 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8410 $end shift, and go to state 3
8411 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8412 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8413 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8414 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8418 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8419 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8420 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8421 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8422 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8425 @cindex accepting state
8426 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8432 0 $accept: exp $end .
8438 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8439 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8441 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8447 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8449 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8456 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8458 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8465 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8467 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8474 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8476 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8481 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8487 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8493 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8494 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8496 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8497 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8500 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8501 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8502 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8503 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8504 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8505 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8506 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8507 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8509 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8510 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8511 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8514 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8515 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8516 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8517 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8518 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8519 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8520 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8521 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8522 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8523 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8524 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8525 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8530 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8531 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8536 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8537 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8539 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8540 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8543 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8544 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8545 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8546 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8547 conflicts in the report:
8550 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8551 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8552 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8556 The remaining states are similar:
8562 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8568 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8569 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8571 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8572 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8578 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8584 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8586 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8587 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8593 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8599 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8600 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8601 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8602 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8604 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8605 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8606 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8607 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8608 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8613 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8614 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8615 @samp{*}, but also because the
8616 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8618 Note that Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML
8619 file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml}).
8621 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
8624 @section Visualizing Your Parser
8627 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
8628 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
8629 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
8630 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
8631 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
8632 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
8633 to help them understand LR parsers.
8635 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
8636 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
8637 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
8638 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
8639 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}.
8641 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8652 The graphical output is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is
8653 easier understood by making direct comparisons between them. See
8654 @ref{Debugging, , Debugging Your Parser} for a detailled analysis of the
8657 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
8659 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
8660 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
8661 about transitions, for examples
8663 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
8664 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
8665 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
8670 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
8673 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
8675 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
8676 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
8684 ";" shift, and go to state 6
8688 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8690 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
8692 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
8694 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
8695 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
8696 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
8697 action for the given state, there is no such label.
8699 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
8706 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
8707 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
8710 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8712 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
8714 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
8715 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
8716 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
8717 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
8718 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
8720 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation state. It
8721 is shown as a blue diamond, labelled "Acc".
8723 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
8725 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
8726 the name of the rule being jumped to.
8728 Note that a DOT file may also be produced via an XML file and XSLT
8729 processing (@pxref{Xml}).
8731 @c ================================================= XML
8734 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
8737 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
8738 (@pxref{Understanding}) when invoked with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
8739 (@pxref{Graphviz}) when invoked with option @option{--graph}. However,
8740 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
8741 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
8742 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
8743 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
8744 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
8745 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
8747 The textual file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
8748 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
8749 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
8750 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
8751 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
8752 file is @file{foo.xml}.
8754 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
8755 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
8759 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
8761 Used to output a copy of the .output file.
8763 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the .output file.
8766 Sample usage (requires @code{xsltproc}):
8770 $ bison --print-datadir
8771 /usr/local/share/bison
8773 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl input.xml > input.html
8776 @c ================================================= Tracing
8779 @section Tracing Your Parser
8782 @cindex tracing the parser
8784 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
8785 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
8788 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
8789 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
8790 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
8793 @node Enabling Traces
8794 @subsection Enabling Traces
8795 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8798 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8800 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8801 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8802 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8803 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8806 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
8807 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
8808 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
8809 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
8810 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
8812 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
8813 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
8814 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8815 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
8816 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
8818 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8820 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8821 Summary}). This is a Bison extension, especially useful for languages that
8822 don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to you,
8823 this is the preferred solution.
8826 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8830 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8831 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8832 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8833 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8834 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8835 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8837 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8838 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8839 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8840 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8842 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8843 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8844 messages tell you these things:
8848 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8851 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8852 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8855 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8856 of the state stack afterward.
8859 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
8860 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
8861 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8862 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8863 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8864 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8865 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8866 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8867 grammar are to blame.
8869 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
8870 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8871 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8872 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8873 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8876 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
8878 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
8879 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
8880 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
8881 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
8882 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
8883 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
8885 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
8886 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
8887 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
8890 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
8892 /* Generate the parser description file. */
8894 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
8897 /* Formatting semantic values. */
8898 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
8899 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
8900 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
8903 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
8904 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
8905 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
8906 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
8907 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
8908 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
8910 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
8911 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
8912 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
8913 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
8914 printer will be used for them.
8916 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
8917 are sent onto standard error.
8920 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
8923 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
8924 -> $$ = nterm input ()
8930 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
8931 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
8932 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
8933 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
8935 Then the parser calls the scanner.
8937 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
8938 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
8943 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
8944 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
8945 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
8949 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
8950 Shifting token '(' ()
8952 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8953 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8955 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8956 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8957 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8963 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
8964 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting non-terminal
8965 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
8968 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
8969 Shifting token '-' ()
8971 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8972 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8974 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8975 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8976 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8977 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
8979 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
8980 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
8981 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8983 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8984 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
8990 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
8991 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
8994 Next token is token ')' ()
8995 Shifting token ')' ()
8997 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
8998 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9000 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9002 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9008 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9012 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9013 Shifting token '\n' ()
9015 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9016 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9019 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9022 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9025 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9030 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9031 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9032 completion of the parsing.
9035 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9036 Shifting token $end ()
9039 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9040 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9044 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9045 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9048 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9049 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9050 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9052 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9054 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9055 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9056 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9058 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9061 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9062 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9066 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9067 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9068 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9071 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9074 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9077 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9078 else if (type == NUM)
9079 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9083 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9086 @chapter Invoking Bison
9087 @cindex invoking Bison
9088 @cindex Bison invocation
9089 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9091 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9097 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9098 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9099 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9100 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9101 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9102 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9103 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9104 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9105 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9106 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9107 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9112 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9115 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9118 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9121 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9123 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9124 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9125 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9128 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9129 in alphabetical order by short options.
9130 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9131 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9135 @section Bison Options
9137 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9138 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9139 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9140 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9141 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9144 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9145 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9148 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
9154 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9158 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9160 @item --print-localedir
9161 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9163 @item --print-datadir
9164 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9168 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9169 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9170 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9171 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9172 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9173 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9174 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9175 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9176 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9177 for compatibility with POSIX:
9184 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9185 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9186 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9187 this option is specified.
9189 @item -W [@var{category}]
9190 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9191 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9194 @item midrule-values
9195 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9197 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9200 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9203 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9204 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9207 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9210 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9211 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9212 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9215 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9219 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9220 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9221 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9222 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9223 no effect on the conflict report.
9226 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9228 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9229 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9235 Turn off all the warnings.
9237 Treat warnings as errors.
9240 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9241 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9242 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9251 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9252 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9253 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9255 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9256 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9257 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9258 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9259 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9260 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9261 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9265 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9268 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9269 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9270 definition for @var{name}.
9272 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9273 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9274 definitions for @var{name}.
9276 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9277 definitions for @var{name}.
9280 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9281 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9282 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9284 @item -L @var{language}
9285 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9286 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9287 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9288 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9289 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9291 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
9295 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9297 @item -p @var{prefix}
9298 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9299 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
9300 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
9301 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
9305 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9306 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9307 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9308 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9309 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9310 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9313 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9314 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9315 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9317 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9318 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9319 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9320 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9322 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9323 file in the Bison installation directory.
9324 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9325 current working directory.
9326 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9329 @itemx --token-table
9330 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9337 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9338 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9339 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9340 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9343 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9344 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9345 with other short options.
9347 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9348 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9349 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9350 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9352 @item -r @var{things}
9353 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9354 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9355 separated list of @var{things} among:
9359 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9363 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9364 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9367 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9368 each rule's lookahead set.
9371 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
9372 precedence and associativity directives.
9375 Enable all the items.
9378 Do not generate the report.
9381 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9382 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9386 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9387 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9388 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9391 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9392 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9394 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9395 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9397 @item -g [@var{file}]
9398 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9399 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9400 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9401 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9402 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9403 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9406 @item -x [@var{file}]
9407 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9408 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9409 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9410 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9412 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9413 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9416 @node Option Cross Key
9417 @section Option Cross Key
9419 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9420 the corresponding short option and directive.
9422 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9423 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9424 @include cross-options.texi
9428 @section Yacc Library
9430 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9431 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9432 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9433 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9434 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9435 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9436 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9438 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9439 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9442 int yyerror (char const *);
9445 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9446 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9447 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9453 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9455 @node Other Languages
9456 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9459 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9460 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9464 @section C++ Parsers
9467 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9468 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9469 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9470 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9471 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9472 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9475 @node C++ Bison Interface
9476 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9477 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9481 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9482 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9483 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9484 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9486 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9488 @findex %define namespace
9489 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
9490 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
9491 generated in the following files:
9496 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
9497 location tracking. These files are not generated if the @code{%define}
9498 variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
9501 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9504 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9505 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9506 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9507 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9508 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9510 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9511 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9512 @samp{%defines} directive.
9515 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9516 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9518 @node C++ Semantic Values
9519 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9520 @c - No objects in unions
9522 @c - Printer and destructor
9524 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9525 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9526 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
9527 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
9528 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9531 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9532 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9533 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9535 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9536 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9537 to such objects are allowed.
9540 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9541 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9542 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9546 @node C++ Location Values
9547 @subsection C++ Location Values
9551 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9553 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9554 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
9556 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
9557 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9558 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
9559 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
9560 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
9563 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
9564 genuine code only the latter is used.
9567 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
9568 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
9569 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
9573 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
9575 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9576 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
9577 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
9581 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9582 Reset the position to the given values.
9585 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
9586 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9587 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9588 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9589 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9592 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
9593 The line, starting at 1.
9596 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9597 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9600 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
9601 The column, starting at 1.
9604 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9605 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9608 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
9609 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
9610 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
9611 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
9612 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9615 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
9616 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
9617 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
9620 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9621 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9622 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9623 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9627 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
9629 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
9630 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9633 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
9634 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
9635 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9638 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9639 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
9642 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
9643 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
9644 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9647 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9648 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9649 Advance the @code{end} position.
9652 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
9653 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
9654 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
9655 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9658 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9659 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9662 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
9663 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
9664 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
9668 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
9669 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
9670 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
9673 @node User Defined Location Type
9674 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
9675 @findex %define api.location.type
9677 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
9678 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
9681 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
9684 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
9687 it must be copyable;
9690 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
9691 parser basically runs
9693 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
9694 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
9697 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
9700 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
9701 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
9704 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
9705 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
9710 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
9711 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
9712 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
9713 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
9718 %define namespace "master::"
9722 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
9723 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
9726 %define api.location.type "master::location"
9727 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
9730 @node C++ Parser Interface
9731 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
9732 @c - define parser_class_name
9734 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9736 @c - Reporting errors
9738 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9739 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9740 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9741 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9742 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9743 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9744 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9745 additional argument for its constructor.
9747 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9748 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9749 The types for semantics value and locations.
9752 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9753 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
9754 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
9755 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9756 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9757 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9760 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9761 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9762 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9765 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9766 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9769 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
9770 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
9771 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
9774 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9775 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9776 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9780 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9781 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9782 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9783 or nonzero, full tracing.
9786 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9787 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9788 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9789 described by @var{m}.
9793 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9794 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9795 @c - prefix for yylex.
9796 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9799 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9800 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9801 @code{%define api.pure full} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
9803 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9804 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9805 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9806 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9810 @node A Complete C++ Example
9811 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9813 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9814 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9815 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9816 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9817 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9818 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9819 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
9820 actually easier to interface with.
9823 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9824 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9825 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9826 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9827 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9830 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9831 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9833 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9834 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9835 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9836 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9837 of valid input follows.
9841 seven := one + two * three
9845 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9846 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9848 @c - A place to store error messages
9849 @c - A place for the result
9851 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9852 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9853 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9854 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9855 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9856 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9857 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9859 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9860 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9861 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9864 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9866 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9867 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9870 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9875 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9876 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9877 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9878 factor both as follows.
9880 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9882 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9884 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
9885 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
9886 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
9887 calcxx_driver& driver)
9888 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9893 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9896 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9898 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9903 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9905 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9911 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
9912 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
9914 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9916 // Handling the scanner.
9919 bool trace_scanning;
9923 Similarly for the parser itself.
9925 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9927 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
9928 int parse (const std::string& f);
9934 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9935 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9936 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9937 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9939 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9942 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9943 void error (const std::string& m);
9945 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9948 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9949 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9950 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9951 messages and set error state.
9953 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9955 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9956 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9958 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9959 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9961 variables["one"] = 1;
9962 variables["two"] = 2;
9965 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9970 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9974 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9975 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9976 int res = parser.parse ();
9982 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9984 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9988 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9990 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9995 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9997 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9998 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9999 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
10000 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
10003 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10005 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
10006 %require "@value{VERSION}"
10008 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
10012 @findex %code requires
10013 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
10014 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
10015 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
10016 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
10017 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
10018 use a forward declaration of the driver.
10019 @xref{%code Summary}.
10021 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10025 class calcxx_driver;
10030 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
10031 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
10034 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10036 // The parsing context.
10037 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10038 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10042 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
10043 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
10044 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
10045 automatically propagated.
10047 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10052 // Initialize the initial location.
10053 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
10058 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
10059 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
10062 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10069 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
10072 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10084 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
10085 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
10087 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10090 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10096 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
10097 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
10098 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
10099 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
10100 avoid name clashes.
10102 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10104 %token END 0 "end of file"
10106 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
10107 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
10112 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
10113 @code{%destructor}.
10115 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
10116 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10118 %printer @{ yyoutput << *$$; @} "identifier"
10119 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
10121 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <ival>
10125 The grammar itself is straightforward.
10127 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10131 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
10134 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
10135 | assignments assignment @{@};
10138 "identifier" ":=" exp
10139 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
10143 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
10144 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
10145 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
10146 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
10147 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
10148 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
10153 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
10156 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10159 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
10160 const std::string& m)
10162 driver.error (l, m);
10166 @node Calc++ Scanner
10167 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
10169 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
10170 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
10172 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10174 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
10175 # include <cstdlib>
10177 # include <climits>
10179 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10180 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10182 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
10183 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
10184 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
10185 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
10187 # define yywrap() 1
10189 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
10190 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
10191 not of token_type. */
10192 #define yyterminate() return token::END
10197 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
10198 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
10199 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
10200 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
10202 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10204 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
10208 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
10210 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10212 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
10218 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
10219 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
10220 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
10221 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
10222 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
10223 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
10224 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
10226 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10230 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
10237 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
10238 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
10242 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
10243 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
10244 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
10245 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
10247 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10250 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
10252 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
10253 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
10254 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
10257 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
10258 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
10259 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
10261 return token::NUMBER;
10263 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
10264 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
10269 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
10270 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
10272 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10276 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
10278 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
10279 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
10281 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
10283 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
10284 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10291 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
10298 @node Calc++ Top Level
10299 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
10301 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
10303 @comment file: calc++.cc
10305 #include <iostream>
10306 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10310 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10312 calcxx_driver driver;
10313 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
10314 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
10315 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10316 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
10317 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10318 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
10319 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10325 @section Java Parsers
10328 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10329 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10330 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10331 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10332 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10333 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10334 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10335 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10338 @node Java Bison Interface
10339 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10340 @c - %language "Java"
10342 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10343 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10345 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10346 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10348 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10349 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10350 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10351 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10352 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10353 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10354 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10355 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10356 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10357 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10359 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10361 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10362 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10363 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10364 and @code{%define api.pure full} directives does not do anything when used in
10367 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10368 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10370 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10371 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10373 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10374 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10376 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10377 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
10378 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
10379 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10380 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10381 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
10382 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
10383 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
10384 access the token names and codes.
10386 @node Java Semantic Values
10387 @subsection Java Semantic Values
10388 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
10390 @c - Printer and destructor
10392 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
10393 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
10394 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
10397 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
10398 %type <Integer> number
10401 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
10402 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
10403 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
10404 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
10405 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
10408 %define stype "ASTNode"
10412 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
10413 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
10415 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10416 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
10417 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
10418 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
10419 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
10420 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
10422 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
10423 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
10424 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
10426 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
10427 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
10428 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
10431 @node Java Location Values
10432 @subsection Java Location Values
10434 @c - class Position
10435 @c - class Location
10437 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
10438 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
10439 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
10440 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10441 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
10442 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
10443 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
10445 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
10446 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
10447 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
10448 be supplied by the user.
10451 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10452 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10453 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10456 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10457 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10460 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10461 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10464 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10465 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10466 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10467 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10471 @node Java Parser Interface
10472 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10473 @c - define parser_class_name
10475 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10477 @c - Reporting errors
10479 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10480 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10481 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10482 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10483 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10485 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10486 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10487 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10488 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10489 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10490 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10492 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10493 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10494 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10495 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
10497 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10498 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10499 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10500 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10501 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10502 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10504 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
10505 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
10507 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10508 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10509 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10510 which initialize them automatically.
10512 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
10513 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
10515 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10516 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10517 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
10521 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10522 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
10523 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
10525 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
10526 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
10527 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
10530 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
10531 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
10532 @code{false} otherwise.
10535 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
10536 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
10537 from a syntax error.
10538 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10541 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
10542 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
10543 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10547 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
10548 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
10549 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10550 or nonzero, full tracing.
10554 @node Java Scanner Interface
10555 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
10558 @c - Lexer interface
10560 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
10561 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10562 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10563 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
10565 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10566 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10567 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10568 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10571 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10572 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10573 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10574 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10577 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10579 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10580 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10581 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10582 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
10585 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10586 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10587 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10590 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10591 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10594 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10595 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10596 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10597 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10598 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10600 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
10601 "@var{class-name}".}
10604 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10605 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10607 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
10608 "@var{class-name}".}
10612 @node Java Action Features
10613 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10615 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10616 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10618 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10619 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10622 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10623 This may not be assigned to.
10624 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10627 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10628 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10629 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10633 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10634 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10635 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10636 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10637 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10638 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10641 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10642 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10643 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10644 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10646 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10650 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10651 This may not be assigned to.
10652 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10656 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10657 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10660 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
10661 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10662 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10665 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
10666 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10667 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10670 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
10671 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
10672 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10675 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10676 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10677 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10679 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10682 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
10683 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
10684 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
10685 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10690 @node Java Differences
10691 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10693 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10694 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10695 section summarizes these differences.
10699 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10700 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10701 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10702 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10703 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10704 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10705 @xref{Java Action Features}.
10707 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10708 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10709 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10710 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10711 corresponds to these C macros.}.
10714 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10715 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10716 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10717 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10718 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10719 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10720 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10721 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
10722 @ref{Java Action Features}.
10725 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10727 @item @code{%code imports}
10728 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10729 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10730 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
10732 @item unqualified @code{%code}
10733 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10735 @item @code{%code lexer}
10736 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10737 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10738 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
10742 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10743 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10744 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10746 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10747 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10752 @node Java Declarations Summary
10753 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10755 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10756 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10758 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10759 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10762 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10763 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10764 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10765 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10766 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10769 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10770 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10771 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10772 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10775 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10776 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10777 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10778 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10781 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10782 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10783 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10786 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10787 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10788 a Java @emph{type}.
10789 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10792 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10793 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10794 @xref{Java Differences}.
10797 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10798 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10799 @xref{Java Differences}.
10802 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10803 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10804 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10807 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10808 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10809 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10810 @xref{Java Differences}.
10813 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10814 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
10815 @xref{Java Differences}.
10818 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10819 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10820 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10823 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10824 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10825 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10828 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10829 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10830 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10833 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10834 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10836 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10839 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10840 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10841 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10842 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10845 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
10846 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10847 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10848 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10849 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
10850 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10853 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10854 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10855 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10858 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10859 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10860 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10861 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10864 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
10865 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10866 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10867 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
10868 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10871 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10872 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10873 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10876 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10877 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10878 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10881 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10882 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10883 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10886 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10887 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10888 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10889 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10893 @c ================================================= FAQ
10896 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10897 @cindex frequently asked questions
10900 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10904 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10905 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10906 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10907 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10908 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10909 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10910 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10911 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10912 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10913 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10914 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10915 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10918 @node Memory Exhausted
10919 @section Memory Exhausted
10922 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10923 message. What can I do?
10926 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10929 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10930 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10932 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10933 following typical questions:
10936 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10937 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10938 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10945 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10946 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10947 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure full}.
10950 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10951 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10952 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10953 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10954 @file{first-line.l}:
10960 #include <stdlib.h>
10964 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10968 yyparse (char const *file)
10970 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10974 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10978 /* One token only. */
10980 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10983 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11001 If the file @file{input} contains
11009 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
11012 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
11013 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
11014 $ @kbd{./first-line}
11019 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
11020 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
11021 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
11022 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
11023 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
11024 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
11025 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
11026 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
11029 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
11030 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
11031 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
11032 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
11034 @node Strings are Destroyed
11035 @section Strings are Destroyed
11038 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
11039 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
11040 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
11043 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
11044 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
11045 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
11051 char *yylval = NULL;
11056 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
11064 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
11065 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
11066 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
11067 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
11073 If you compile and run this code, you get:
11076 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11077 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11078 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11084 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
11085 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
11086 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
11087 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
11088 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
11089 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
11092 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11093 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11094 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11099 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
11100 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
11103 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
11104 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
11107 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
11108 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
11109 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
11110 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
11111 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
11112 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
11113 execute simple instructions one after the others.
11115 @cindex abstract syntax tree
11117 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
11118 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
11119 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
11120 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
11121 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
11122 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
11125 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
11126 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
11129 @node Multiple start-symbols
11130 @section Multiple start-symbols
11133 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
11134 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
11135 multiple entry points.
11138 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
11139 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
11140 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
11141 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
11145 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
11152 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
11153 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
11155 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
11156 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
11157 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
11158 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
11159 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
11160 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
11161 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
11162 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
11165 /* @r{Prologue.} */
11170 int t = start_token;
11175 /* @r{The rules.} */
11179 @node Secure? Conform?
11180 @section Secure? Conform?
11183 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
11186 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
11187 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
11188 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
11189 please send us a bug report.
11191 @node I can't build Bison
11192 @section I can't build Bison
11195 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
11196 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
11200 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
11201 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
11202 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
11203 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
11204 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
11205 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
11206 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
11209 @node Where can I find help?
11210 @section Where can I find help?
11213 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
11216 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
11217 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
11218 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
11219 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
11220 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
11221 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
11222 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
11223 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
11227 @section Bug Reports
11230 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
11233 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
11234 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
11235 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
11236 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
11237 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
11239 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
11240 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
11241 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
11242 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
11243 easier it will be to fix the bug.
11245 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
11246 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
11247 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
11248 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
11249 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
11250 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
11252 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
11253 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
11255 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
11257 @node More Languages
11258 @section More Languages
11261 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
11262 favorite language here}?
11265 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
11266 languages; contributions are welcome.
11269 @section Beta Testing
11272 What is involved in being a beta tester?
11275 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
11276 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
11277 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
11278 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
11279 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
11280 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
11281 essentially halted.
11283 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
11284 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
11285 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
11286 systems are especially welcome.
11288 @node Mailing Lists
11289 @section Mailing Lists
11292 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
11295 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
11297 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11299 @node Table of Symbols
11300 @appendix Bison Symbols
11301 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11302 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11304 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11305 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11306 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11309 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11310 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11311 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11314 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11315 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11319 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11320 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11324 @deffn {Variable} $$
11325 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11329 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11330 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11331 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
11334 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
11335 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11339 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
11340 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11344 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
11345 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
11346 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
11347 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
11350 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
11351 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
11352 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
11353 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
11354 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
11358 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
11359 Comment delimiters, as in C.
11362 @deffn {Delimiter} :
11363 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
11367 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
11368 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11371 @deffn {Delimiter} |
11372 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
11373 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11376 @deffn {Directive} <*>
11377 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
11380 This feature is experimental.
11381 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11384 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11387 @deffn {Directive} <>
11388 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
11391 This feature is experimental.
11392 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11395 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11398 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
11399 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
11400 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
11401 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
11404 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
11405 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
11406 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
11407 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
11408 @xref{%code Summary}.
11411 @deffn {Directive} %debug
11412 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11416 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
11417 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11418 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11423 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
11424 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
11425 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
11426 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
11429 @deffn {Directive} %defines
11430 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
11431 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11434 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
11435 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
11436 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11439 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
11440 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
11441 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11444 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
11445 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
11446 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
11450 @deffn {Symbol} $end
11451 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11452 used in the grammar.
11455 @deffn {Symbol} error
11456 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11457 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11458 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11459 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11460 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
11461 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
11462 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
11463 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11466 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
11467 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
11468 when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11471 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11472 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
11476 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
11477 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
11478 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11481 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
11482 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
11485 @deffn {Directive} %language
11486 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
11487 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11490 @deffn {Directive} %left
11491 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
11492 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11495 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11496 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11497 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
11501 @deffn {Directive} %merge
11502 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
11503 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
11504 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
11505 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11508 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11509 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
11510 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
11512 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
11513 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
11514 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
11516 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
11517 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
11518 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
11519 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
11520 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
11521 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
11522 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
11523 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
11528 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
11529 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11530 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11535 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
11536 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
11537 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11540 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
11541 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
11542 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11545 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
11546 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
11547 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11550 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11551 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11552 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
11553 Function @code{yyparse}}.
11556 @deffn {Directive} %prec
11557 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
11558 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
11561 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11562 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
11563 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
11564 unreasonable usage.
11567 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11568 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11569 Require a Version of Bison}.
11572 @deffn {Directive} %right
11573 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
11574 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11577 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11578 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11579 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11582 @deffn {Directive} %start
11583 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11587 @deffn {Directive} %token
11588 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11589 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11592 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
11593 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
11594 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11597 @deffn {Directive} %type
11598 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11599 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11602 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11603 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11604 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11608 @deffn {Directive} %union
11609 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11610 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11613 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11614 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11615 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11616 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11617 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11619 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11623 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11624 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11625 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11626 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11628 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11632 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11633 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11634 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11637 @deffn {Variable} yychar
11638 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11639 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11640 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11641 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11644 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11645 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11646 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11649 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11650 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11651 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11654 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
11655 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11656 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11657 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11660 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11661 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11662 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11665 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11666 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
11667 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
11668 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
11669 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
11670 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11672 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11676 @deffn {Function} yyerror
11677 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11678 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
11679 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11682 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11683 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
11684 to request verbose, specific error message strings
11685 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
11686 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it.
11687 Supported by the C skeletons only; using
11688 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11691 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
11692 Macro used to output run-time traces.
11693 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
11696 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11697 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11698 @xref{Memory Management}.
11701 @deffn {Function} yylex
11702 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11703 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11707 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11708 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11709 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11710 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11711 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11714 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
11715 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11716 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11717 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11719 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11721 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11722 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11723 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11726 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11727 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11728 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11731 @deffn {Variable} yylval
11732 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11733 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11734 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11736 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11737 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11738 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11741 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11742 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11746 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11747 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11748 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11749 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11750 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11753 @deffn {Function} yyparse
11754 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11755 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11758 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
11759 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
11760 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
11761 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
11764 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11765 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11766 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11767 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11768 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11769 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11770 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11773 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11774 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11775 call this function to create a new parser.
11776 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11777 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11778 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11779 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11782 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11783 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11784 parse the rest of the input stream.
11785 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11786 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11787 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11788 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11791 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11792 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11793 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11794 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11795 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11796 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11799 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11800 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11801 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11802 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11803 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11806 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11807 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11808 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11809 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11812 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
11813 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
11814 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
11815 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
11816 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
11817 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11818 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11820 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11821 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11822 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11823 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11824 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11825 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11826 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11829 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11830 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11831 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11839 @item Accepting state
11840 A state whose only action is the accept action.
11841 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11842 @xref{Understanding,,}.
11844 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11845 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11846 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11847 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11848 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11850 @item Consistent state
11851 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11853 @item Context-free grammars
11854 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11855 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11856 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11857 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11860 @item Default reduction
11861 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11862 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
11863 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
11864 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11867 @item Defaulted state
11868 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11870 @item Dynamic allocation
11871 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11872 compile time or on entry to a function.
11875 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11876 character string of length zero.
11878 @item Finite-state stack machine
11879 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11880 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11881 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11882 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11883 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11884 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11886 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11887 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11888 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11889 deterministic parsing
11890 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11891 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11892 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11896 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11897 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11898 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11900 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11901 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11902 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11903 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11904 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11905 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11906 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11907 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11908 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11909 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11911 @item Infix operator
11912 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11913 performs some operation.
11916 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11918 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11919 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11920 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11921 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11922 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11923 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11924 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11926 @item Language construct
11927 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11928 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11929 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11931 @item Left associativity
11932 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11933 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11934 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11936 @item Left recursion
11937 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11938 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11941 @item Left-to-right parsing
11942 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11943 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11945 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11946 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11947 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11949 @item Lexical tie-in
11950 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11951 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11953 @item Literal string token
11954 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11956 @item Lookahead token
11957 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11961 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11962 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11963 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11966 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11967 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11969 @item Nonterminal symbol
11970 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11971 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11972 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11975 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11976 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11979 @item Postfix operator
11980 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11981 performs some operation.
11984 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11985 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11989 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11990 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11991 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11993 @item Reverse polish notation
11994 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11996 @item Right recursion
11997 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11998 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12002 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
12003 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
12004 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
12007 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
12008 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
12009 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12011 @item Single-character literal
12012 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
12013 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
12016 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
12017 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
12018 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
12019 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
12022 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
12023 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
12024 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
12027 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
12028 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12031 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
12032 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
12033 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
12034 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
12036 @item Terminal symbol
12037 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
12038 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
12039 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12041 @item Unreachable state
12042 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
12043 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
12044 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
12047 @node Copying This Manual
12048 @appendix Copying This Manual
12052 @unnumbered Bibliography
12056 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
12057 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
12058 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
12059 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
12061 @item [Denny 2010 May]
12062 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
12063 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
12064 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
12065 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
12067 @item [Denny 2010 November]
12068 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
12069 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
12070 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
12071 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
12073 @item [DeRemer 1982]
12074 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
12075 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
12076 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
12077 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
12080 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
12081 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
12082 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
12085 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
12086 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
12087 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
12088 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
12091 @node Index of Terms
12092 @unnumbered Index of Terms
12098 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
12099 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
12100 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
12101 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
12102 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
12103 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
12104 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
12105 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
12106 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
12107 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
12108 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
12109 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
12110 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
12111 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
12112 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
12113 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
12114 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
12115 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
12116 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
12117 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
12118 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
12119 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
12120 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
12121 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
12122 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
12123 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
12124 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
12125 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
12126 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
12127 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
12128 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
12129 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
12130 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
12131 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
12132 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
12133 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
12134 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
12135 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
12136 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
12137 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
12138 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
12139 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
12140 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
12141 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
12142 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
12143 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
12144 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
12145 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
12146 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
12147 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
12148 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
12149 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
12150 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
12151 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
12152 @c LocalWords: parsers parser's
12153 @c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
12154 @c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
12155 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
12157 @c Local Variables:
12158 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"