1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual is for @acronym{GNU} Bison (version @value{VERSION},
34 @value{UPDATED}), the @acronym{GNU} parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1998,
37 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the @acronym{GNU} Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A @acronym{GNU} Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``@acronym{GNU} Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The @acronym{FSF}'s Back-Cover Text is: ``You have freedom to copy
49 and modify this @acronym{GNU} Manual, like @acronym{GNU} software.
50 Copies published by the Free Software Foundation raise funds for
51 @acronym{GNU} development.''
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). @acronym{GNU} parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
75 @acronym{ISBN} 1-882114-44-2
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The @acronym{GNU} General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser source file).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
115 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
117 The Concepts of Bison
119 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
120 as mathematical ideas.
121 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
122 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
123 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
124 the name of an identifier, etc.).
125 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
126 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
127 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
128 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
129 how is the output used?
130 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
131 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
133 Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers
135 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers on unambiguous grammars.
136 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers to resolve ambiguities.
137 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
138 * Compiler Requirements:: @acronym{GLR} parsers require a modern C compiler.
142 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
143 a first example with no operator precedence.
144 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
145 Operator precedence is introduced.
146 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
147 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
148 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
149 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
150 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
152 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
154 * Decls: Rpcalc Decls. Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
155 * Rules: Rpcalc Rules. Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
156 * Lexer: Rpcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
157 * Main: Rpcalc Main. The controlling function.
158 * Error: Rpcalc Error. The error reporting function.
159 * Gen: Rpcalc Gen. Running Bison on the grammar file.
160 * Comp: Rpcalc Compile. Run the C compiler on the output code.
162 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
168 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
170 * Decls: Ltcalc Decls. Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
171 * Rules: Ltcalc Rules. Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
172 * Lexer: Ltcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
174 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
176 * Decl: Mfcalc Decl. Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
177 * Rules: Mfcalc Rules. Grammar rules for the calculator.
178 * Symtab: Mfcalc Symtab. Symbol table management subroutines.
182 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
183 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
184 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
185 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
186 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
187 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
188 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
189 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
191 Outline of a Bison Grammar
193 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
194 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
195 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
196 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
197 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
199 Defining Language Semantics
201 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
202 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
203 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
204 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
205 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
206 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
207 action in the middle of a rule.
211 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
212 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
213 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
217 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
218 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
219 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
220 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
221 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
222 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
223 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
224 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
225 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
226 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
227 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
228 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
230 Parser C-Language Interface
232 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
233 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
235 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
236 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
237 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
240 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
242 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
243 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
244 of the token it has read.
245 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
246 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
248 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs
249 in a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
251 The Bison Parser Algorithm
253 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
254 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
255 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
256 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
257 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
258 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
259 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
260 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
261 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
265 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
266 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
267 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
268 * How Precedence:: How they work.
270 Handling Context Dependencies
272 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
273 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
274 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
275 error recovery rules must be written.
277 Debugging Your Parser
279 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
280 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
284 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
285 in alphabetical order by short options.
286 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
287 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
289 Parsers Written In Other Languages
291 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
292 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
296 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
297 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
298 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
299 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
300 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
301 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
303 A Complete C++ Example
305 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
306 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
307 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
308 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
309 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
313 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
314 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
315 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
316 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
317 * Java Scanner Interface:: Java scanners, and pure parsers
318 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
320 Frequently Asked Questions
322 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
323 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
324 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
325 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
326 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
327 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison @acronym{POSIX} safe?
328 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
329 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
330 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
331 * Other Languages:: Parsers in Java and others
332 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
333 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
337 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
343 @unnumbered Introduction
346 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
347 annotated context-free grammar into an @acronym{LALR}(1) or
348 @acronym{GLR} parser for that grammar. Once you are proficient with
349 Bison, you can use it to develop a wide range of language parsers, from those
350 used in simple desk calculators to complex programming languages.
352 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc grammars
353 ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar with Yacc
354 should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need to be fluent in
355 C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to understand this manual.
357 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of using
358 Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the last. If you
359 don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these chapters. Reference
360 chapters follow which describe specific aspects of Bison in detail.
362 Bison was written primarily by Robert Corbett; Richard Stallman made it
363 Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University added
364 multi-character string literals and other features.
366 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
369 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
371 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
372 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
373 permissions applied only when Bison was generating @acronym{LALR}(1)
374 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
375 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
377 The other @acronym{GNU} programming tools, such as the @acronym{GNU} C
379 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
380 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
381 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
382 License to all of the Bison source code.
384 The output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser file---contains a
385 verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is the code for the
386 parser's implementation. (The actions from your grammar are inserted
387 into this implementation at one point, but most of the rest of the
388 implementation is not changed.) When we applied the @acronym{GPL}
389 terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
390 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
392 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
393 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
394 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
395 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
396 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
397 using the other @acronym{GNU} tools.
399 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
400 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
401 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
402 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
406 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
407 @include gpl-3.0.texi
410 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
412 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
413 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
414 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
417 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
418 as mathematical ideas.
419 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
420 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
421 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
422 the name of an identifier, etc.).
423 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
424 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
425 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
426 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
427 how is the output used?
428 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
429 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
432 @node Language and Grammar
433 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
435 @cindex context-free grammar
436 @cindex grammar, context-free
437 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
438 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
439 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
440 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
441 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
442 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
443 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
444 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
447 @cindex @acronym{BNF}
448 @cindex Backus-Naur form
449 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
450 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``@acronym{BNF}'', which was developed in
451 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
452 @acronym{BNF} is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
453 essentially machine-readable @acronym{BNF}.
455 @cindex @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars
456 @cindex @acronym{LR}(1) grammars
457 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammar. Although it
458 can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
459 are called @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars.
460 In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible to
461 tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single
462 token of lookahead. Strictly speaking, that is a description of an
463 @acronym{LR}(1) grammar, and @acronym{LALR}(1) involves additional
464 restrictions that are
465 hard to explain simply; but it is rare in actual practice to find an
466 @acronym{LR}(1) grammar that fails to be @acronym{LALR}(1).
467 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}, for
468 more information on this.
470 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
471 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
472 @cindex ambiguous grammars
473 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
475 Parsers for @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
476 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
477 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
478 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
479 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
480 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
481 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
482 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
483 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
484 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as @acronym{GLR}
485 parsing (for Generalized @acronym{LR}). Bison's @acronym{GLR} parsers
486 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
487 possible parses of any given string is finite.
489 @cindex symbols (abstract)
491 @cindex syntactic grouping
492 @cindex grouping, syntactic
493 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
494 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
495 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
496 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
497 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
498 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
499 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
501 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
502 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
503 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
504 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
505 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
506 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
507 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
508 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
509 lexicography, not grammar.)
511 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
515 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
516 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
517 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
518 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
519 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
520 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
521 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
526 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
527 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
528 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
529 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
530 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
534 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
535 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
536 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
537 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
538 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
539 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
540 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
541 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
543 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
544 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
545 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
546 reads informally as follows:
549 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
554 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
558 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
559 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
560 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
561 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
564 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
565 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
566 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
567 not the start symbol.
569 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
570 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
571 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
572 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
573 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
574 reports a syntax error.
576 @node Grammar in Bison
577 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
578 @cindex Bison grammar
579 @cindex grammar, Bison
580 @cindex formal grammar
582 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
583 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
584 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
586 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
587 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
588 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
590 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
591 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
592 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
593 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
594 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
595 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
596 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
599 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
600 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
601 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
602 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
604 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
605 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
607 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
608 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
609 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
610 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
614 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
619 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
621 @node Semantic Values
622 @section Semantic Values
623 @cindex semantic value
624 @cindex value, semantic
626 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
627 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
628 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
629 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
630 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
633 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
634 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
635 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
636 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
637 ,Defining Language Semantics},
640 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
641 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
642 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
643 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
646 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
647 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
648 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
649 need to have any semantic value.)
651 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
652 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
653 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
654 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
655 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
656 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
658 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
659 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
660 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
661 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
662 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
664 @node Semantic Actions
665 @section Semantic Actions
666 @cindex semantic actions
667 @cindex actions, semantic
669 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
670 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
671 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
672 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
675 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
676 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
677 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
678 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
679 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
680 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
681 newly recognized larger expression.
683 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
687 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
692 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
693 from the values of the two subexpressions.
696 @section Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers
697 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
698 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
701 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
702 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
704 In some grammars, Bison's standard
705 @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
706 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
707 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
708 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
709 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
710 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
711 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
712 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
714 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be @acronym{LALR}(1), a
715 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
716 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
717 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized @acronym{LR}
718 (@acronym{GLR}) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
719 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
720 declarations) identically to @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers. However, when
721 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
722 @acronym{GLR} parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
723 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
724 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
725 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
726 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
727 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
728 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
729 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
730 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
731 identical set of symbols.
733 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
734 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
735 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
736 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
737 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
738 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
739 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
740 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
741 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
745 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers on unambiguous grammars.
746 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers to resolve ambiguities.
747 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
748 * Compiler Requirements:: @acronym{GLR} parsers require a modern C compiler.
751 @node Simple GLR Parsers
752 @subsection Using @acronym{GLR} on Unambiguous Grammars
753 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing, unambiguous grammars
754 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing, unambiguous grammars
758 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
759 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
761 In the simplest cases, you can use the @acronym{GLR} algorithm
762 to parse grammars that are unambiguous, but fail to be @acronym{LALR}(1).
763 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead,
764 or (in rare cases) fall into the category of grammars in which the
765 @acronym{LALR}(1) algorithm throws away too much information (they are in
766 @acronym{LR}(1), but not @acronym{LALR}(1), @ref{Mystery Conflicts}).
768 Consider a problem that
769 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
770 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
773 type subrange = lo .. hi;
774 type enum = (a, b, c);
778 The original language standard allows only numeric
779 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
780 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (@acronym{ISO}/@acronym{IEC}
781 10206) and many other
782 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
783 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
787 type subrange = (a) .. b;
791 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
792 type with only one value:
799 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
800 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
802 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
803 With normal @acronym{LALR}(1) one-token lookahead it is not
804 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
805 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
806 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
807 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
808 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
809 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
811 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
812 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
813 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
814 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
817 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
818 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
819 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
820 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
821 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
822 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
825 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
826 use the @acronym{GLR} algorithm.
827 When the @acronym{GLR} parser reaches the critical state, it
828 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
829 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
830 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
831 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
832 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
833 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
834 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
835 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
837 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
838 reports a syntax error as usual.
840 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
841 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
842 lookahead than the underlying @acronym{LALR}(1) algorithm actually allows
843 for. In this example, @acronym{LALR}(2) would suffice, but also some cases
844 that are not @acronym{LALR}(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
846 In general, a @acronym{GLR} parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
847 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
848 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
849 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
850 The present example contains only one conflict between two
851 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
852 cannot be nested. So the number of
853 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
854 and the parsing time is still linear.
856 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
857 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
860 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
870 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
875 type : '(' id_list ')'
897 When used as a normal @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
898 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
899 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
900 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
907 The parser can be turned into a @acronym{GLR} parser, while also telling Bison
908 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by
909 adding these two declarations to the Bison input file (before the first
918 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
919 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
920 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
921 notice when the parser splits.
923 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of @acronym{GLR},
924 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
925 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
926 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that @acronym{GLR}
927 splitting is only done where it is intended. A @acronym{GLR} parser
928 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
929 @acronym{LALR} parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
930 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
931 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
932 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
933 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
934 eliminated by using @acronym{GLR} to shift the complications from the
935 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
938 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
939 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
940 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
941 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
942 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
943 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
945 @node Merging GLR Parses
946 @subsection Using @acronym{GLR} to Resolve Ambiguities
947 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing, ambiguous grammars
948 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing, ambiguous grammars
952 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
954 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
959 #define YYSTYPE char const *
961 void yyerror (char const *);
974 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
977 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
981 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
982 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
983 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
984 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
985 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
988 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
989 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
990 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
991 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
994 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1000 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1001 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1008 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1009 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1010 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1011 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1012 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1013 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1014 @acronym{GLR} parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1015 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1016 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1017 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1018 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1019 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1020 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1021 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1023 At this point, the @acronym{GLR} parser requires a specification in the
1024 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1025 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1026 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1027 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1028 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1029 The parser therefore prints
1032 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1035 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1036 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1043 This is another example of using @acronym{GLR} to parse an unambiguous
1044 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1045 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1046 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1047 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1048 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1049 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1050 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1051 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1052 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1058 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1059 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1060 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1061 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1065 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1066 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1071 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1075 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1083 with an accompanying forward declaration
1084 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1088 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1089 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1094 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1095 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1098 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1101 Bison requires that all of the
1102 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1103 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1104 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1105 the offending merge.
1107 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1108 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1110 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1111 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1112 the associated reduction.
1113 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1114 action in a @acronym{GLR} parser.
1117 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yychar}
1119 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yylval}
1121 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yylloc}
1122 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1123 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1124 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1125 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1126 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1127 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1128 influence syntax analysis.
1129 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1132 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1133 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1134 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1135 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1136 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1137 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1138 future versions of Bison.
1139 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1140 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1141 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1144 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1145 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1146 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1147 initiate error recovery.
1148 During deterministic @acronym{GLR} operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1149 the same as its effect in an @acronym{LALR}(1) parser.
1150 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1151 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1153 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1154 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in @acronym{GLR} parsers.
1156 @node Compiler Requirements
1157 @subsection Considerations when Compiling @acronym{GLR} Parsers
1158 @cindex @code{inline}
1159 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{inline}
1161 The @acronym{GLR} parsers require a compiler for @acronym{ISO} C89 or
1162 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1163 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1164 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1165 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1166 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1175 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1179 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1185 @node Locations Overview
1188 @cindex textual location
1189 @cindex location, textual
1191 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1192 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1193 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1194 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1196 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1197 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens and
1198 groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1199 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Locations}, for more details).
1201 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1202 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1203 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1206 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1207 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1208 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1209 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1210 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1211 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1212 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1215 @section Bison Output: the Parser File
1216 @cindex Bison parser
1217 @cindex Bison utility
1218 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1221 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The output
1222 is a C source file that parses the language described by the grammar.
1223 This file is called a @dfn{Bison parser}. Keep in mind that the Bison
1224 utility and the Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility
1225 is a program whose output is the Bison parser that becomes part of your
1228 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1229 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1230 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1233 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1234 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1235 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1236 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1237 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1238 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1239 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1241 The Bison parser file is C code which defines a function named
1242 @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This function does not make
1243 a complete C program: you must supply some additional functions. One is
1244 the lexical analyzer. Another is an error-reporting function which the
1245 parser calls to report an error. In addition, a complete C program must
1246 start with a function called @code{main}; you have to provide this, and
1247 arrange for it to call @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run.
1248 @xref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}.
1250 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1251 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser file itself
1252 begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface functions
1253 such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the error reporting
1254 function @code{yyerror} and the parser function @code{yyparse} itself.
1255 This also includes numerous identifiers used for internal purposes.
1256 Therefore, you should avoid using C identifiers starting with @samp{yy}
1257 or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar file except for the ones defined in
1258 this manual. Also, you should avoid using the C identifiers
1259 @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for anything other than their usual
1262 In some cases the Bison parser file includes system headers, and in
1263 those cases your code should respect the identifiers reserved by those
1264 headers. On some non-@acronym{GNU} hosts, @code{<alloca.h>}, @code{<malloc.h>},
1265 @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are included as needed to
1266 declare memory allocators and related types. @code{<libintl.h>} is
1267 included if message translation is in use
1268 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may
1269 be included if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value
1270 (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1273 @section Stages in Using Bison
1274 @cindex stages in using Bison
1277 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1278 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1282 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1283 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1284 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1285 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1286 sequence of C statements.
1289 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1290 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1291 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1292 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1295 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1298 Write error-reporting routines.
1301 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1302 must follow these steps:
1306 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1309 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1312 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1315 @node Grammar Layout
1316 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1317 @cindex grammar file
1319 @cindex format of grammar file
1320 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1322 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1323 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1330 @var{Bison declarations}
1339 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1340 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1342 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1343 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1344 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1345 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1346 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1347 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1349 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1350 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1351 semantic values of various symbols.
1353 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1356 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1357 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1358 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1362 @cindex simple examples
1363 @cindex examples, simple
1365 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1366 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1367 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1368 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1369 desk-top calculator.
1371 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1372 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1373 source file to try them.
1376 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1377 a first example with no operator precedence.
1378 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1379 Operator precedence is introduced.
1380 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1381 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1382 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1383 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1384 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1388 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1389 @cindex reverse polish notation
1390 @cindex polish notation calculator
1391 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1392 @cindex calculator, simple
1394 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1395 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1396 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1397 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1399 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1400 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison input files.
1403 * Decls: Rpcalc Decls. Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1404 * Rules: Rpcalc Rules. Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1405 * Lexer: Rpcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
1406 * Main: Rpcalc Main. The controlling function.
1407 * Error: Rpcalc Error. The error reporting function.
1408 * Gen: Rpcalc Gen. Running Bison on the grammar file.
1409 * Comp: Rpcalc Compile. Run the C compiler on the output code.
1413 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1415 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1416 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1419 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1422 #define YYSTYPE double
1425 void yyerror (char const *);
1430 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1433 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1434 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1436 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1437 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1438 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1439 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1440 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1441 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1442 which is a floating point number.
1444 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1445 function @code{pow}.
1447 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1448 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1449 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1450 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1453 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1454 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1455 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1456 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1457 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1458 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1459 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1460 type for numeric constants.
1463 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1465 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1473 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1476 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1477 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1478 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1479 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1480 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1481 /* Exponentiation */
1482 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1484 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1489 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1490 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1491 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1492 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1493 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1496 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1497 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1498 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1500 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1501 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1502 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1503 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1504 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1505 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1514 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1516 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1524 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1525 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1526 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1527 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1528 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1530 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1531 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1532 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1533 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1534 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1535 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1537 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1538 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1539 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1540 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1543 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1544 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1545 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1548 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1550 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1554 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1558 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1559 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1560 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1561 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1562 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1563 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1564 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1566 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1567 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1568 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1569 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1570 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1573 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1575 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1576 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1577 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1578 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1582 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1583 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1588 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1589 equally well have written them separately:
1593 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1594 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1598 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1599 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1600 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1601 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1602 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1603 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1604 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1605 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1607 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1608 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1609 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1611 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1612 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1616 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1620 means the same thing as this:
1624 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1630 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1633 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1634 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1635 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1637 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1638 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1639 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1640 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1642 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the @acronym{RPN}
1644 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1645 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1646 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1647 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1649 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1650 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1651 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1652 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1653 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1654 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1655 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1656 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1657 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1659 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1660 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1661 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1662 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Decls,
1663 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1665 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1666 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1668 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1672 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1673 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1674 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1675 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1686 /* Skip white space. */
1687 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1691 /* Process numbers. */
1692 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1695 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1700 /* Return end-of-input. */
1703 /* Return a single char. */
1710 @subsection The Controlling Function
1711 @cindex controlling function
1712 @cindex main function in simple example
1714 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1715 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1716 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1729 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1730 @cindex error reporting routine
1732 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1733 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1734 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1735 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1736 here is the definition we will use:
1742 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1744 yyerror (char const *s)
1746 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1751 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1752 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1753 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1754 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1755 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1756 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1759 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1760 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1762 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1763 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1764 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file. The
1765 definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} go at the
1766 end, in the epilogue of the file
1767 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1769 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1770 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1772 With all the source in a single file, you use the following command to
1773 convert it into a parser file:
1780 In this example the file was called @file{rpcalc.y} (for ``Reverse Polish
1781 @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c},
1782 removing the @samp{.y} from the original file name. The file output by
1783 Bison contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional
1784 functions in the input file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main})
1785 are copied verbatim to the output.
1787 @node Rpcalc Compile
1788 @subsection Compiling the Parser File
1789 @cindex compiling the parser
1791 Here is how to compile and run the parser file:
1795 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1797 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1801 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1802 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1803 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1807 # @r{List files again.}
1809 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1813 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1814 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1820 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1822 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1826 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1828 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1833 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1834 @cindex infix notation calculator
1836 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1838 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1839 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1840 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1841 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1844 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1847 #define YYSTYPE double
1851 void yyerror (char const *);
1854 /* Bison declarations. */
1858 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1859 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1861 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1867 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1870 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1871 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1872 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1873 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1874 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1875 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1876 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1877 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1883 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1886 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1888 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1889 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1890 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1891 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1892 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1893 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1896 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1897 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1898 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1899 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1900 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1903 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1904 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1905 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1906 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1907 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1909 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1914 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1922 @node Simple Error Recovery
1923 @section Simple Error Recovery
1924 @cindex error recovery, simple
1926 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1927 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1928 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1929 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1930 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1931 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1933 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1934 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1935 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1940 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1941 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
1946 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
1947 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
1948 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
1949 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
1950 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
1951 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
1952 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
1953 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
1956 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
1957 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
1958 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
1959 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
1960 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
1961 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
1964 @node Location Tracking Calc
1965 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
1966 @cindex location tracking calculator
1967 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
1968 @cindex calculator, location tracking
1970 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
1971 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
1972 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
1973 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
1977 * Decls: Ltcalc Decls. Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
1978 * Rules: Ltcalc Rules. Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
1979 * Lexer: Ltcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
1983 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
1985 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
1986 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
1989 /* Location tracking calculator. */
1995 void yyerror (char const *);
1998 /* Bison declarations. */
2006 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2010 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2011 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2012 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2013 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2014 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2015 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2016 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2020 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2022 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2023 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2024 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2025 from the new information.
2027 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2028 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2039 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2044 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2045 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2046 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2047 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2057 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2058 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2059 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2064 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2065 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2066 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2070 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2071 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2072 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2074 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2075 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2076 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2077 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2078 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2079 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2083 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2085 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2086 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2087 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2090 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2091 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2102 /* Skip white space. */
2103 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2104 ++yylloc.last_column;
2109 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2110 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2114 /* Process numbers. */
2118 ++yylloc.last_column;
2119 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2121 ++yylloc.last_column;
2122 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2129 /* Return end-of-input. */
2133 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2137 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2140 ++yylloc.last_column;
2145 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2146 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2147 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2148 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2150 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2151 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2152 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2153 controlling function:
2160 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2161 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2167 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2168 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2169 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2171 @node Multi-function Calc
2172 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2173 @cindex multi-function calculator
2174 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2175 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2177 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2178 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2179 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2180 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2181 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2183 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2184 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2185 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2186 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2187 functions whose syntax has this form:
2190 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2194 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2195 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2196 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2200 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2204 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2210 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2215 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2218 * Decl: Mfcalc Decl. Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2219 * Rules: Mfcalc Rules. Grammar rules for the calculator.
2220 * Symtab: Mfcalc Symtab. Symbol table management subroutines.
2224 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2226 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2231 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2232 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2234 void yyerror (char const *);
2239 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2240 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2243 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2244 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2251 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2252 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2254 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2257 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2258 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2259 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2261 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2262 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2263 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2264 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2266 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2267 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2268 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2269 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2270 between angle brackets).
2272 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2273 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2274 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2275 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2276 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2277 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2280 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2282 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2283 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2284 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2296 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2297 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2302 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2303 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2304 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2305 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2306 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2307 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2308 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2309 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2310 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2311 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2312 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2315 /* End of grammar. */
2320 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2321 @cindex symbol table example
2323 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2324 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2325 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2326 requires some additional C functions for support.
2328 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2329 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2330 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2334 /* Function type. */
2335 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2339 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2342 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2343 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2346 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2347 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2349 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2354 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2356 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2357 extern symrec *sym_table;
2359 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2360 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2364 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2365 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2366 @code{init_table} as well:
2372 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2374 yyerror (char const *s)
2384 double (*fnct) (double);
2389 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2402 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2407 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2413 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2415 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2416 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2431 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2432 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2434 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2435 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2436 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2437 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2438 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2439 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2443 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2446 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2447 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2448 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2449 ptr->type = sym_type;
2450 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2451 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2457 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2460 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2461 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2462 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2468 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2469 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2470 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2471 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2473 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2474 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2475 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2476 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2477 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2478 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2480 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2481 operators in @code{yylex}.
2494 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2495 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t');
2502 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2503 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2506 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2512 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2516 static char *symbuf = 0;
2517 static int length = 0;
2522 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2523 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2525 length = 40, symbuf = (char *)malloc (length + 1);
2532 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2536 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2538 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2540 /* Get another character. */
2545 while (isalnum (c));
2552 s = getsym (symbuf);
2554 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2559 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2565 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2566 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2567 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2575 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2578 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2579 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2580 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2583 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2584 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2588 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2590 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2591 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2593 The Bison grammar input file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2594 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2597 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2598 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2599 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2600 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2601 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2602 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
2603 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2604 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2607 @node Grammar Outline
2608 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2610 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2611 appropriate delimiters:
2618 @var{Bison declarations}
2627 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2628 As a @acronym{GNU} extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2629 continues until end of line.
2632 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2633 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2634 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2635 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2636 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2640 @subsection The prologue
2641 @cindex declarations section
2643 @cindex declarations
2645 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2646 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2647 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser file so that
2648 they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can use
2649 @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If you
2650 don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2651 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2653 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2654 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2657 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2658 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2659 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2660 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2661 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2662 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2663 @code{%union} declaration.
2674 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2678 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2679 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2685 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2686 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2687 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2688 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2689 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2690 @code{#include} directives.
2692 @node Prologue Alternatives
2693 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2694 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2697 @findex %code requires
2698 @findex %code provides
2700 (The prologue alternatives described here are experimental.
2701 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
2704 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2706 As an alternative, Bison provides a %code directive with an explicit qualifier
2707 field, which identifies the purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where
2708 Bison should generate it.
2709 For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default location, or it can be
2710 one of @code{requires}, @code{provides}, @code{top}.
2711 @xref{Decl Summary,,%code}.
2713 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2724 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2728 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2729 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2736 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a subtle
2737 distinction between their functionality.
2738 For example, if you decide to override Bison's default definition for
2739 @code{YYLTYPE}, in which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new
2741 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code into the
2742 parser source code file @emph{before} the default @code{YYLTYPE} definition.
2743 In which @var{Prologue} section should you prototype an internal function,
2744 @code{trace_token}, that accepts @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as
2746 You should prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2747 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2749 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2750 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2751 This behavior raises a few questions.
2752 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2753 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2754 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2755 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2756 This behavior is not intuitive.
2758 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2759 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2760 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2761 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2768 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2769 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2772 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2773 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2785 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2789 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2790 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2791 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2798 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2799 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2800 explicit which kind you intend.
2801 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2803 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts.
2804 The first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2805 parser source code file.
2806 The first line after the warning is required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also
2807 needs to appear in the parser source code file.
2808 However, if you've instructed Bison to generate a parser header file
2809 (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably want that line to appear before
2810 the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that header file as well.
2811 The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear in the parser header file to
2812 override the default @code{YYLTYPE} definition there.
2814 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2815 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2817 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2830 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2834 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2835 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2846 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2847 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2848 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2855 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new @code{YYLTYPE}
2856 definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2857 definitions in both the parser source code file and the parser header file.
2858 (By the same reasoning, @code{%code requires} would also be the appropriate
2859 place to write your own definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2861 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}, you
2862 should prefer @code{%code requires} over @code{%code top} regardless of whether
2863 you instruct Bison to generate a parser header file.
2864 When you are writing code that you need Bison to insert only into the parser
2865 source code file and that has no special need to appear at the top of that
2866 file, you should prefer the unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}.
2867 These practices will make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to
2868 Bison and to other developers reading your grammar file.
2869 Following these practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and
2870 @code{%code requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2873 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to provide
2874 @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your parser.
2875 Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into both the parser
2876 header file and the parser source code file.
2877 Since this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2878 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2879 @code{%code requires}.
2880 More importantly, since it depends upon @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype},
2881 @code{%code requires} is not sufficient.
2882 Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified @code{%code} to a
2883 @code{%code provides}:
2896 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2900 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2901 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2912 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2916 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2917 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2924 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the parser header
2925 file and the parser source code file after the definitions for
2926 @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYSTYPE}.
2928 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that reflects
2929 the layout of the generated parser source code and header files:
2930 @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, and then
2932 While your grammar files may generally be easier to read if you also follow
2933 this order, Bison does not require it.
2934 Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense to you.
2936 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
2937 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
2938 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
2939 the grammar file affects its functionality.
2941 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
2942 organize your grammar file.
2943 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
2947 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
2948 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
2949 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
2950 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
2952 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
2953 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
2954 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
2955 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
2959 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
2960 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
2962 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
2964 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
2965 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
2966 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
2967 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
2969 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
2970 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
2971 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
2972 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
2973 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
2974 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
2975 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
2976 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
2979 @node Bison Declarations
2980 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
2981 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
2982 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
2984 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
2985 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
2986 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
2987 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
2990 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
2991 @cindex grammar rules section
2992 @cindex rules section for grammar
2994 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
2995 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
2997 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
2998 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
2999 if it is the first thing in the file.
3002 @subsection The epilogue
3003 @cindex additional C code section
3005 @cindex C code, section for additional
3007 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser file, just as
3008 the @var{Prologue} is copied to the beginning. This is the most convenient
3009 place to put anything that you want to have in the parser file but which need
3010 not come before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the
3011 definitions of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because
3012 C requires functions to be declared before being used, you often need
3013 to declare functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue,
3014 even if you define them in the Epilogue.
3015 @xref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}.
3017 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3018 from the grammar rules.
3020 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3021 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3022 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3023 of the grammar file.
3026 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3027 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3028 @cindex terminal symbol
3032 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3035 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3036 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3037 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3038 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3039 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3040 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3041 the symbol to stand for it.
3043 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3044 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3045 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3047 Symbol names can contain letters, digits (not at the beginning),
3048 underscores and periods. Periods make sense only in nonterminals.
3050 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3054 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3055 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3056 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3057 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3060 @cindex character token
3061 @cindex literal token
3062 @cindex single-character literal
3063 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3064 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3065 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3066 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3067 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3068 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3069 ,Operator Precedence}).
3071 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3072 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3073 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3074 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3075 your program will confuse other readers.
3077 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3078 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3079 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3080 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3081 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3082 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3086 @cindex string token
3087 @cindex literal string token
3088 @cindex multicharacter literal
3089 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3090 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3091 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3092 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3093 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3095 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3096 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3097 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3098 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3099 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3101 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3103 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3104 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3105 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3106 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3107 read your program will be confused.
3109 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3110 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3111 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3112 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3113 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3114 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3117 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3118 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3119 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3121 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3122 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3123 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3124 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3125 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3126 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3127 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3128 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3129 Each named token type becomes a C macro in
3130 the parser file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code.
3131 (This is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.)
3132 @xref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3134 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3135 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3136 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3137 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3138 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3140 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3141 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3142 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3143 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3144 characters in the following C-language string:
3147 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3150 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3151 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3152 @acronym{ASCII} environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3153 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3154 @acronym{EBCDIC}, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3155 generated by Bison will assume @acronym{ASCII} numeric values for
3156 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3157 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3158 @acronym{ASCII} environment, so installers on platforms that are
3159 incompatible with @acronym{ASCII} must rebuild those files before
3162 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3163 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3164 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3165 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3166 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3169 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3171 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3172 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3174 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3178 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3184 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3185 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3186 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3198 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3199 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3201 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3202 extra white space as you wish.
3204 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3205 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3208 @{@var{C statements}@}
3213 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3214 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3215 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3216 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3217 copies the code to the output file, where the C compiler can check it.
3219 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3220 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3221 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3222 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3223 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3224 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3225 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3226 character constants.
3228 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3232 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3233 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3237 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3238 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3245 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3247 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3248 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3249 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3266 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3270 @section Recursive Rules
3271 @cindex recursive rule
3273 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3274 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3275 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3276 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3277 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3287 @cindex left recursion
3288 @cindex right recursion
3290 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3291 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3292 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3303 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3304 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3305 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3306 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3307 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3308 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3309 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3312 @cindex mutual recursion
3313 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3314 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3315 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3323 | primary '+' primary
3335 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3339 @section Defining Language Semantics
3340 @cindex defining language semantics
3341 @cindex language semantics, defining
3343 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3344 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3345 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3347 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3348 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3349 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3350 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3353 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3354 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3355 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3356 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3357 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3358 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3359 action in the middle of a rule.
3363 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3364 @cindex semantic value type
3365 @cindex value type, semantic
3366 @cindex data types of semantic values
3367 @cindex default data type
3369 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3370 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3371 @acronym{RPN} and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3372 Notation Calculator}).
3374 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3375 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3376 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3379 #define YYSTYPE double
3383 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3384 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3385 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3386 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3388 @node Multiple Types
3389 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3391 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3392 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3393 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3394 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3397 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3398 requires you to do two things:
3402 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3403 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3404 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3405 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3409 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3410 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3411 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3412 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3413 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3422 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3423 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3424 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3425 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3427 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3428 placed at any position in the rule;
3429 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3430 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3431 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3432 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3434 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the components
3435 matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}}, which stands for
3436 the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic value for the grouping
3437 being constructed is @code{$$}. Bison translates both of these
3438 constructs into expressions of the appropriate type when it copies the
3439 actions into the parser file. @code{$$} is translated to a modifiable
3440 lvalue, so it can be assigned to.
3442 Here is a typical example:
3453 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3454 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3455 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3456 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3457 The sum is stored into @code{$$} so that it becomes the semantic value of
3458 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3459 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3460 referred to as @code{$2}.
3462 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3463 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3464 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3465 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3466 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3470 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3474 @cindex default action
3475 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3476 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3477 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3478 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3479 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3480 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3482 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3483 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3484 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3485 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3486 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3490 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3491 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3497 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3502 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3503 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3504 definition of @code{foo}.
3507 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3508 any, from a semantic action.
3509 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3510 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3513 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3514 @cindex action data types
3515 @cindex data types in actions
3517 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3518 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3520 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3521 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3522 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3523 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3524 in the rule. In this example,
3535 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3536 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3537 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3538 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3540 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3541 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3542 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3554 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3555 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3557 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3558 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3559 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3560 @cindex mid-rule actions
3562 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3563 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3564 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3566 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3567 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3568 it is run before they are parsed.
3570 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3571 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3572 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3573 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3576 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3577 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3578 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3579 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3580 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3581 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3583 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3584 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3585 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3586 at the end of the rule.
3588 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3589 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3590 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3591 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3592 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3593 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3597 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3598 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3599 declare_variable ($3); @}
3601 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3606 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3607 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3608 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3609 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3610 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3611 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3612 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3613 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3615 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3616 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3617 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3618 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3619 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3622 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3623 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3624 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3625 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3626 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3628 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3629 Discarded Symbols}).
3630 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3631 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3633 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3634 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3639 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3645 pop_context ($1); @}
3648 let: LET '(' var ')'
3649 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3650 declare_variable ($3); @}
3657 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3658 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3659 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3661 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3662 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3663 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3664 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3665 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3670 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3671 | '@{' statements '@}'
3677 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3681 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3682 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3685 | '@{' statements '@}'
3691 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3692 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3693 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3694 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3695 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3696 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3698 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3699 actions into the two rules, like this:
3703 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3704 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3705 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3706 '@{' statements '@}'
3712 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3713 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3715 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3716 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3717 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3721 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3722 declarations statements '@}'
3723 | '@{' statements '@}'
3729 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3730 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3732 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3733 serves as a subroutine:
3737 subroutine: /* empty */
3738 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3744 compound: subroutine
3745 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3747 '@{' statements '@}'
3753 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3754 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3757 @section Tracking Locations
3759 @cindex textual location
3760 @cindex location, textual
3762 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3763 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3764 especially symbol locations.
3766 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3767 actions to take when rules are matched.
3770 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3771 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3772 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3776 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3777 @cindex data type of locations
3778 @cindex default location type
3780 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3781 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3783 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3784 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3785 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3786 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3790 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3799 At the beginning of the parsing, Bison initializes all these fields to 1
3802 @node Actions and Locations
3803 @subsection Actions and Locations
3804 @cindex location actions
3805 @cindex actions, location
3809 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3810 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3812 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3813 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3814 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3815 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3816 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3819 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3826 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3827 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3828 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3829 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3836 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3837 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3838 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3844 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3845 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3846 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
3849 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
3850 example above simply rewrites this way:
3863 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3864 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3865 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3872 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
3873 from a semantic action.
3874 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
3875 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3877 @node Location Default Action
3878 @subsection Default Action for Locations
3879 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
3880 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
3882 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
3883 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
3884 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
3885 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
3886 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
3887 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
3888 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a @acronym{GLR}
3889 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
3892 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
3893 dedicated code from semantic actions.
3895 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
3896 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
3897 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
3898 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
3899 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
3900 When a @acronym{GLR} parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
3901 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
3902 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
3903 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
3904 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
3906 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
3910 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
3914 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
3915 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
3916 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
3917 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
3921 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
3922 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
3923 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
3924 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
3930 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
3931 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
3932 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
3934 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
3938 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
3939 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
3942 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
3943 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
3944 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
3945 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
3948 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
3949 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
3950 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
3951 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
3955 @section Bison Declarations
3956 @cindex declarations, Bison
3957 @cindex Bison declarations
3959 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
3960 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
3963 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
3964 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
3965 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
3966 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
3968 The first rule in the file also specifies the start symbol, by default.
3969 If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you must declare
3970 it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
3974 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
3975 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
3976 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
3977 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
3978 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
3979 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
3980 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
3981 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
3982 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
3983 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
3984 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
3985 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
3989 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
3990 @cindex version requirement
3991 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
3994 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
3995 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
3999 %require "@var{version}"
4003 @subsection Token Type Names
4004 @cindex declaring token type names
4005 @cindex token type names, declaring
4006 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4009 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4015 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4016 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4017 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4019 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4020 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4021 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4024 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4025 a decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4026 following the token name:
4030 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4034 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4035 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4036 with each other or with normal characters.
4038 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4039 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4040 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4041 Than One Value Type}).
4047 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4051 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4055 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4056 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4057 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4064 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4065 equivalent literal string tokens:
4068 %token <operator> OR "||"
4069 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4074 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4075 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4076 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4077 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4079 @node Precedence Decl
4080 @subsection Operator Precedence
4081 @cindex precedence declarations
4082 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4083 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4085 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4086 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4087 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4088 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4089 operator precedence.
4091 The syntax of a precedence declaration is the same as that of
4092 @code{%token}: either
4095 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4102 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4105 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4106 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4107 all the @var{symbols}:
4111 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4112 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4113 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4114 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4115 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4116 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4117 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4118 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4119 considered a syntax error.
4122 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4123 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4124 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4125 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4126 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4130 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4131 @cindex declaring value types
4132 @cindex value types, declaring
4135 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4136 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4137 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4152 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4153 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4154 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4155 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4157 As an extension to @acronym{POSIX}, a tag is allowed after the
4158 @code{union}. For example:
4170 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4171 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4174 As another extension to @acronym{POSIX}, you may specify multiple
4175 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4176 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4178 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4179 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4181 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4182 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4183 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4184 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4192 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4197 and then your grammar can use the following
4198 instead of @code{%union}:
4211 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4212 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4213 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4217 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4218 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4219 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4222 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4226 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4227 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4228 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4229 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4230 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4233 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4234 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4235 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4236 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4238 @node Initial Action Decl
4239 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4240 @findex %initial-action
4242 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4243 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4246 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4247 @findex %initial-action
4248 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4249 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4250 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4251 @code{%parse-param}.
4254 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4257 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4260 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4265 @node Destructor Decl
4266 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4267 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4271 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4272 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4273 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4274 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4275 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4276 must discard the start symbol.
4278 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4279 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4280 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4281 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4283 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4284 symbol is automatically discarded.
4286 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4288 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4290 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4291 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4292 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4293 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4295 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4296 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4297 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4298 tag among @var{symbols}.
4299 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4300 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4301 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4303 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4304 (These default forms are experimental.
4305 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4307 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4308 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4309 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4310 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4312 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4313 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4314 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4315 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4316 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4323 %union @{ char *string; @}
4324 %token <string> STRING1
4325 %token <string> STRING2
4326 %type <string> string1
4327 %type <string> string2
4328 %union @{ char character; @}
4329 %token <character> CHR
4330 %type <character> chr
4333 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4334 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4335 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4336 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4340 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4341 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4342 to @code{free} by default.
4343 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4344 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4345 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4346 @code{free} only once.
4347 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4348 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4350 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4351 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4352 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4353 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4354 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4355 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4356 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4357 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4358 reference it in your grammar.
4359 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4360 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4366 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4367 @cindex mid-rule actions
4368 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4369 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4370 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you do
4371 not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}} (where
4372 @var{n} is the RHS symbol position of the mid-rule) in any later action in that
4374 However, if you do reference either, the Bison-generated parser will invoke the
4375 @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4379 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4380 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4381 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4386 @cindex discarded symbols
4387 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4391 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4393 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4395 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4396 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4398 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4401 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4402 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4405 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4406 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4407 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4411 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4412 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4413 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4414 @cindex warnings, preventing
4415 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4419 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4420 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4421 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4422 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4423 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4424 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4426 The declaration looks like this:
4432 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4433 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4434 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4435 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4437 For normal @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4438 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4439 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With @acronym{GLR}
4440 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4441 there would be no need to use @acronym{GLR} parsing. Therefore, it is
4442 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4443 in @acronym{GLR} parsers, using the declaration:
4449 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4453 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4454 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4455 print the number of conflicts.
4458 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4459 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4460 go back to the beginning.
4463 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4464 number which Bison printed. With @acronym{GLR} parsers, add an
4465 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4468 Now Bison will warn you if you introduce an unexpected conflict, but
4469 will keep silent otherwise.
4472 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4473 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4474 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4475 @cindex default start symbol
4478 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4479 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4480 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4487 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4488 @cindex reentrant parser
4490 @findex %pure-parser
4492 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4493 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4494 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4495 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4496 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4497 program must be called only within interlocks.
4499 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4500 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4501 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4502 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4503 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4505 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4506 declaration @code{%pure-parser} says that you want the parser to be
4507 reentrant. It looks like this:
4513 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4514 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4515 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4516 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4517 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4518 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4519 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4520 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4521 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4523 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4524 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4528 @subsection A Push Parser
4531 @findex %define push_pull
4533 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4534 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4535 each time a new token is made available.
4537 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4538 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4539 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4540 within a certain time period.
4542 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4543 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4544 parser (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%define push_pull}):
4547 %define push_pull "push"
4550 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4551 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4552 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4553 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4554 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4558 %define push_pull "push"
4561 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4562 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4563 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4564 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4566 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4567 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4568 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4569 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4570 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4571 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4572 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4573 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4577 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4579 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4580 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4581 yypstate_delete (ps);
4584 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4585 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4586 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4587 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4588 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4589 example would thus look like this:
4594 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4597 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4598 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4599 yypstate_delete (ps);
4602 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4603 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4605 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4606 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4607 you should replace the @code{%define push_pull "push"} declaration with the
4608 @code{%define push_pull "both"} declaration. Doing this will create all of the
4609 symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4610 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4611 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4612 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4613 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4614 @code{%define push_pull "both"} declaration slower than the normal
4615 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4616 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4617 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4618 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4619 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4620 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4621 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4625 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4626 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4627 yypstate_delete (ps);
4630 Adding the @code{%pure-parser} declaration does exactly the same thing to the
4631 generated parser with @code{%define push_pull "both"} as it did for
4632 @code{%define push_pull "push"}.
4635 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4636 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4637 @cindex declaration summary
4638 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4640 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4642 @deffn {Directive} %union
4643 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4644 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4647 @deffn {Directive} %token
4648 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4649 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4652 @deffn {Directive} %right
4653 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4654 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4657 @deffn {Directive} %left
4658 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4659 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4662 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4663 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4664 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4665 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4669 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4670 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4671 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4675 @deffn {Directive} %type
4676 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4677 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4680 @deffn {Directive} %start
4681 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4685 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4686 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4687 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4693 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4696 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4698 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
4699 It inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location in the
4700 output@footnote{The default location is actually skeleton-dependent;
4701 writers of non-standard skeletons however should choose the default location
4702 consistently with the behavior of the standard Bison skeletons.}.
4705 For C/C++, the default location is the parser source code
4706 file after the usual contents of the parser header file.
4707 Thus, @code{%code} replaces the traditional Yacc prologue,
4708 @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}, for most purposes.
4709 For a detailed discussion, see @ref{Prologue Alternatives}.
4711 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
4713 (Like all the Yacc prologue alternatives, this directive is experimental.
4714 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
4718 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4719 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
4720 If you need to specify location-sensitive verbatim @var{code} that does not
4721 belong at the default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form,
4722 use this form instead.
4724 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the location(s)
4725 where Bison should generate it.
4726 Not all values of @var{qualifier} are available for all target languages:
4730 @findex %code requires
4733 @item Language(s): C, C++
4735 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
4736 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
4737 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
4738 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
4739 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
4741 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser source code file
4742 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
4746 @findex %code provides
4749 @item Language(s): C, C++
4751 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
4752 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
4754 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser source code file after
4755 the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and token definitions.
4762 @item Language(s): C, C++
4764 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires} should
4765 usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}.
4766 However, occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
4767 parser source code file.
4777 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser source code file.
4781 @findex %code imports
4784 @item Language(s): Java
4786 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
4788 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
4789 before any class definitions.
4793 (Like all the Yacc prologue alternatives, this directive is experimental.
4794 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
4798 For a detailed discussion of how to use @code{%code} in place of the
4799 traditional Yacc prologue for C/C++, see @ref{Prologue Alternatives}.
4802 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4803 In the parser file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 if it is not
4804 already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
4806 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4808 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
4809 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
4810 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior.
4811 The possible choices for @var{variable}, as well as their meanings, depend on
4812 the selected target language and/or the parser skeleton (@pxref{Decl
4813 Summary,,%language}).
4815 Bison will warn if a @var{variable} is defined multiple times.
4817 Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} is always equivalent to specifying it as
4820 Some @var{variable}s may be used as Booleans.
4821 In this case, Bison will complain if the variable definition does not meet one
4822 of the following four conditions:
4825 @item @code{"@var{value}"} is @code{"true"}
4827 @item @code{"@var{value}"} is omitted (or is @code{""}).
4828 This is equivalent to @code{"true"}.
4830 @item @code{"@var{value}"} is @code{"false"}.
4832 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
4833 In this case, Bison selects a default value, which may depend on the selected
4834 target language and/or parser skeleton.
4837 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
4841 @findex %define push_pull
4844 @item Language(s): C (LALR(1) only)
4846 @item Purpose: Requests a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
4847 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
4849 @item Accepted Values: @code{"pull"}, @code{"push"}, @code{"both"}
4851 @item Default Value: @code{"pull"}
4854 @item lr.keep_unreachable_states
4855 @findex %define lr.keep_unreachable_states
4858 @item Language(s): all
4860 @item Purpose: Requests that Bison allow unreachable parser states to remain in
4862 Bison considers a state to be unreachable if there exists no sequence of
4863 transitions from the start state to that state.
4864 A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison disables a
4865 shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
4866 Keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful for analysis purposes, but they
4867 are useless in the generated parser.
4869 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
4871 @item Default Value: @code{"false"}
4876 @item Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may reduce rules not
4877 reduced in any other state.
4878 Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are irrelevant to
4879 your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are relevant.
4880 Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a parser table
4881 analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this behavior will likely
4882 remain in future Bison releases.
4884 @item While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
4885 remove other kinds of useless states.
4886 Specifically, when Bison disables reduce actions during conflict resolution,
4887 some goto actions may become useless, and thus some additional states may
4889 If Bison were to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those
4890 actions, it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those
4892 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
4897 @findex %define namespace
4900 @item Languages(s): C++
4902 @item Purpose: Specifies the namespace for the parser class.
4903 For example, if you specify:
4906 %define namespace "foo::bar"
4909 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
4912 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
4915 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
4916 splits on any remaining occurrences:
4919 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
4925 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
4926 a trailing @code{"::"}.
4927 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
4929 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
4931 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
4932 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
4933 lexical analyzer function.
4934 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
4935 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
4936 lexical analyzer function.
4937 For example, if you specify:
4940 %define namespace "foo"
4941 %name-prefix "bar::"
4944 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
4951 @deffn {Directive} %defines
4952 Write a header file containing macro definitions for the token type
4953 names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
4954 If the parser output file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then this file
4955 is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
4957 For C parsers, the output header declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
4958 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
4959 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}.
4960 Therefore, if you are using a @code{%union}
4961 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}) with components that
4962 require other definitions, or if you have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro
4964 (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to
4965 arrange for these definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by
4966 putting them in a prerequisite header that is included both by your
4967 parser and by any other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
4969 Unless your parser is pure, the output header declares @code{yylval}
4970 as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
4973 If you have also used locations, the output header declares
4974 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of
4975 the @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Locations, ,Tracking
4978 This output file is normally essential if you wish to put the definition
4979 of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because @code{yylex}
4980 typically needs to be able to refer to the above-mentioned declarations
4981 and to the token type codes. @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of
4984 @findex %code requires
4985 @findex %code provides
4986 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
4987 header also contains their code.
4988 @xref{Decl Summary, ,%code}.
4991 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
4992 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
4995 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
4996 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
4997 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5000 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5001 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names are
5002 chosen as if the input file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5005 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5006 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5007 supported languages include C and C++.
5008 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5011 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5012 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5013 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5014 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5015 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5016 accurate syntax error messages.
5019 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5020 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5021 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5023 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5024 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5025 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5026 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5027 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5028 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5029 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5030 For C++ parsers, see the @code{%define namespace} documentation in this
5032 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5036 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5037 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5038 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5043 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5044 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5045 file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the parser file so that
5046 the C compiler and debuggers will associate errors and object code with
5047 your source file (the grammar file). This directive causes them to
5048 associate errors with the parser file, treating it an independent source
5049 file in its own right.
5052 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5053 Specify @var{file} for the parser file.
5056 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5057 Request a pure (reentrant) parser program (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5058 (Reentrant) Parser}).
5061 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5062 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5063 Require a Version of Bison}.
5066 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5067 Specify the skeleton to use.
5069 You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5070 You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5071 different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5072 correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5074 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5075 file in the Bison installation directory.
5076 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5077 directory of the grammar file.
5078 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5081 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5082 Generate an array of token names in the parser file. The name of the
5083 array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is the name of the
5084 token whose internal Bison token code number is @var{i}. The first
5085 three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the predefined tokens
5087 @code{"error"}, and @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols
5088 defined in the grammar file.
5090 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5091 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5092 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5093 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5094 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5095 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5096 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5099 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5100 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5101 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5105 The highest token number, plus one.
5107 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5109 The number of grammar rules,
5111 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5115 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5116 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5117 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5118 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5122 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5123 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5124 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5128 @node Multiple Parsers
5129 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5131 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5132 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5133 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5134 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5136 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5137 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5138 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5139 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5140 names that do not conflict.
5142 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5143 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5144 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5145 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5146 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5147 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5148 @code{clex}, and so on.
5150 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5151 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5152 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5153 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5154 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5156 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the beginning
5157 of the parser source file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5158 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes one
5159 name for the other in the entire parser file.
5162 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5163 @cindex C-language interface
5166 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5167 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5168 functions that it needs to use.
5170 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5171 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5172 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5173 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5176 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5177 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5178 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5179 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it
5181 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it
5183 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5185 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5186 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5187 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5191 @node Parser Function
5192 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5195 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5196 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5197 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5198 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5199 without reading further.
5202 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5203 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5204 is due to end-of-input).
5206 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5207 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5210 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5213 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5218 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5223 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5226 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5227 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5228 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5230 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5231 @findex %parse-param
5232 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5233 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5234 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5235 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5236 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5239 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5242 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5243 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5247 Then call the parser like this:
5251 int nastiness, randomness;
5252 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5253 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5259 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5262 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5265 @node Push Parser Function
5266 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5267 @findex yypush_parse
5269 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5270 function is available if either the @code{%define push_pull "push"} or
5271 @code{%define push_pull "both"} declaration is used.
5272 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5274 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5275 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5276 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5277 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5280 @node Pull Parser Function
5281 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5282 @findex yypull_parse
5284 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5285 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define push_pull "both"}
5286 declaration is used.
5287 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5289 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5290 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5293 @node Parser Create Function
5294 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5295 @findex yypstate_new
5297 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5298 This function is available if either the @code{%define push_pull "push"} or
5299 @code{%define push_pull "both"} declaration is used.
5300 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5302 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5303 The fuction will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5304 or NULL if no memory was available.
5307 @node Parser Delete Function
5308 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5309 @findex yypstate_delete
5311 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5312 function is available if either the @code{%define push_pull "push"} or
5313 @code{%define push_pull "both"} declaration is used.
5314 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5316 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5317 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5318 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5322 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5324 @cindex lexical analyzer
5326 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5327 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5328 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5329 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5331 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the Bison
5332 grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source file, you
5333 need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be available there.
5334 To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run Bison, so that it will
5335 write these macro definitions into a separate header file
5336 @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include in the other source files
5337 that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
5340 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5341 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5342 of the token it has read.
5343 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5344 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5346 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs
5347 in a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5350 @node Calling Convention
5351 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5353 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5354 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5355 signifies end-of-input.
5357 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5358 in the parser file becomes a C macro whose definition is the proper
5359 numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can use the name
5360 to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5362 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5363 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5364 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5365 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5366 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5367 signifies end-of-input.
5369 Here is an example showing these things:
5376 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5379 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5380 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5382 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5388 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5389 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5391 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5392 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5396 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5397 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5398 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5399 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5402 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5403 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5404 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5405 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5406 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5409 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5410 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5411 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5412 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5415 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5418 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5419 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5420 strlen (token_buffer))
5421 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5422 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5427 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5428 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5432 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5435 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5436 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5437 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5438 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5444 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5445 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5450 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5451 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5452 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5453 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5454 declaration looks like this:
5467 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5472 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5473 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5478 @node Token Locations
5479 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5482 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Locations, ,
5483 Tracking Locations}) in actions to keep track of the textual locations
5484 of tokens and groupings, then you must provide this information in
5485 @code{yylex}. The function @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual
5486 location of a token just parsed in the global variable @code{yylloc}.
5487 So @code{yylex} must store the proper data in that variable.
5489 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5490 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5491 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5492 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5493 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5496 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5499 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5501 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%pure-parser} to request a
5502 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5503 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5504 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5505 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5506 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
5511 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
5514 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5515 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5520 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
5521 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
5522 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
5526 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
5527 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
5530 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5532 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
5533 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
5539 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5540 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5541 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5545 results in the following signature:
5548 int yylex (int *nastiness);
5549 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5552 If @code{%pure-parser} is added:
5555 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
5556 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5560 and finally, if both @code{%pure-parser} and @code{%locations} are used:
5563 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5564 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5567 @node Error Reporting
5568 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
5569 @cindex error reporting function
5572 @cindex syntax error
5574 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
5575 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
5576 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
5577 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
5580 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
5581 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
5582 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
5583 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
5584 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
5586 @findex %error-verbose
5587 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison
5588 declarations section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations
5589 Section}), then Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message
5590 string instead of just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
5592 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
5593 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
5594 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
5595 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
5596 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
5597 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
5599 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
5600 translated automatically from English to some other language before
5601 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
5603 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
5608 yyerror (char const *s)
5612 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
5617 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
5618 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
5619 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
5620 immediately return 1.
5622 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
5623 an access to the current location.
5624 This is indeed the case for the @acronym{GLR}
5625 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
5626 @samp{%locations %pure-parser} is passed then the prototypes for
5630 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5631 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5634 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
5637 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5638 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5641 Finally, @acronym{GLR} and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
5642 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
5643 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
5644 @code{%pure-parser} are pure. I.e.:
5647 /* Location tracking. */
5651 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5653 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5654 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5658 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
5661 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5662 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5663 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
5664 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
5669 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
5670 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
5671 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
5672 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
5673 message is always passed last.
5675 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
5676 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
5677 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
5681 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
5682 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
5683 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
5684 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
5686 @node Action Features
5687 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
5688 @cindex summary, action features
5689 @cindex action features summary
5691 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
5692 are useful in actions.
5694 @deffn {Variable} $$
5695 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
5696 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
5699 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
5700 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
5701 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
5704 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
5705 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
5706 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
5707 Types of Values in Actions}.
5710 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
5711 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
5712 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
5713 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
5716 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
5717 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
5718 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
5721 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
5722 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
5723 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
5726 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
5728 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
5729 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
5730 It is also disallowed in @acronym{GLR} parsers.
5731 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
5732 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
5733 going to be reduced by this rule.
5735 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
5736 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
5737 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
5740 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
5743 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
5745 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
5748 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
5750 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
5754 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
5756 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
5757 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
5758 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
5759 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
5760 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
5763 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
5764 @findex YYRECOVERING
5765 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
5766 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
5767 @xref{Error Recovery}.
5770 @deffn {Variable} yychar
5771 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
5772 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
5773 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
5774 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
5776 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
5779 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
5780 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
5782 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
5784 @xref{Error Recovery}.
5787 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
5788 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
5789 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
5790 @xref{Error Recovery}.
5793 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
5794 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
5795 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
5796 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
5798 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
5801 @deffn {Variable} yylval
5802 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
5803 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
5804 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
5806 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
5811 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
5812 of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
5813 Tracking Locations}.
5815 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
5819 @c int first_line, last_line;
5820 @c int first_column, last_column;
5824 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
5825 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
5827 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
5828 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
5829 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
5832 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5835 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
5837 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
5838 of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
5839 Tracking Locations}.
5842 @node Internationalization
5843 @section Parser Internationalization
5844 @cindex internationalization
5850 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
5851 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
5852 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
5853 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
5854 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
5855 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
5856 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the @acronym{UTF}-8
5857 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
5860 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
5861 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
5862 steps. Here we assume a package that uses @acronym{GNU} Autoconf and
5863 @acronym{GNU} Automake.
5867 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
5868 Into the directory containing the @acronym{GNU} Autoconf macros used
5869 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
5870 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
5871 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
5875 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
5880 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
5881 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
5882 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
5883 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
5884 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
5885 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
5886 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
5887 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
5888 Bison-generated parser.
5891 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
5892 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
5893 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
5897 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
5900 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
5901 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
5902 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
5906 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
5907 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
5908 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
5911 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
5917 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
5921 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
5927 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
5928 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
5929 @cindex algorithm of parser
5932 @cindex parser stack
5933 @cindex stack, parser
5935 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
5936 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
5937 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
5939 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
5940 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
5943 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
5944 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
5945 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
5946 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
5947 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
5948 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
5949 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
5951 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
5958 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
5959 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
5962 expr: expr '*' expr;
5966 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
5973 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
5974 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
5976 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
5977 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
5978 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
5980 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
5983 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
5984 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
5985 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
5986 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
5987 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
5988 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
5989 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
5990 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
5991 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
5995 @section Lookahead Tokens
5996 @cindex lookahead token
5998 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
5999 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6000 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6001 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6002 token in order to decide what to do.
6004 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6005 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6006 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6007 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6008 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6009 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6010 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6013 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6014 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6015 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6032 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6033 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6034 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6035 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6036 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6038 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6039 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6040 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6041 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6042 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6043 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6048 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6049 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6050 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6051 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6054 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6056 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6057 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6058 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6060 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6061 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6067 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6073 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6074 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6076 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6077 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6078 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6079 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6082 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6083 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6084 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6085 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6086 contrast it with the other alternative.
6088 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6089 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6093 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6095 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6098 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6099 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6100 making these two inputs equivalent:
6103 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6105 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6108 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6109 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6110 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6111 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6112 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6113 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6114 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6115 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6117 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6118 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration. There will be no
6119 warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts is exactly @var{n}.
6120 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6122 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6123 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6124 rules. Here is a complete Bison input file that actually manifests the
6129 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6141 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6150 @section Operator Precedence
6151 @cindex operator precedence
6152 @cindex precedence of operators
6154 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6155 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6156 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6157 shift and when to reduce.
6160 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6161 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6162 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6163 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6166 @node Why Precedence
6167 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6169 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6170 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6184 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6185 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6186 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6187 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6188 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6189 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6190 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6193 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6194 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6195 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6196 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6197 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6198 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6199 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6200 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6203 @cindex associativity
6204 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6205 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6206 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6207 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6208 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6209 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6210 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6211 makes right-associativity.
6213 @node Using Precedence
6214 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6219 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6220 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6221 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6222 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6223 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6224 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6225 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6228 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6229 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6230 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6231 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6232 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6234 @node Precedence Examples
6235 @subsection Precedence Examples
6237 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6245 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6246 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6247 declared with @code{'-'}:
6250 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6256 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6257 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6258 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6260 @node How Precedence
6261 @subsection How Precedence Works
6263 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6264 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6265 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6266 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6267 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6268 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6270 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6271 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6272 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6273 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6274 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6275 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6276 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6279 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6280 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6282 @node Contextual Precedence
6283 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6284 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6285 @cindex unary operator precedence
6286 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6287 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6290 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6291 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6292 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6293 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6295 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6296 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6297 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6298 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6301 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6302 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6303 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6304 modifier's syntax is:
6307 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6311 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6312 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6313 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6314 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6315 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6317 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6318 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6319 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6329 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6336 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6341 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6342 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6343 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6344 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6346 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6347 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6348 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6349 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6351 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6352 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6353 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6354 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6355 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6356 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6358 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6359 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6363 @section Parser States
6364 @cindex finite-state machine
6365 @cindex parser state
6366 @cindex state (of parser)
6368 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6369 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6370 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6371 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6372 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6374 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6375 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6376 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6377 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6378 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6379 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6380 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6381 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6384 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6385 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6386 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6389 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6390 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6391 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6393 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6394 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6397 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6398 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6401 sequence: /* empty */
6402 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6405 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6408 maybeword: /* empty */
6409 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6411 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6416 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6417 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6418 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6419 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6420 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6421 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6423 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6424 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6425 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6427 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6428 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6429 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6430 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6431 In this example, the output of the program changes.
6433 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6434 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6435 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6436 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6439 sequence: /* empty */
6440 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6442 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6446 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6449 sequence: /* empty */
6451 | sequence redirects
6458 redirects:/* empty */
6459 | redirects redirect
6464 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6465 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6466 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6467 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6468 in infinitely many ways!
6470 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6471 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6472 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6473 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6475 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6479 sequence: /* empty */
6485 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6489 sequence: /* empty */
6491 | sequence redirects
6499 | redirects redirect
6503 @node Mystery Conflicts
6504 @section Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6506 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
6514 def: param_spec return_spec ','
6518 | name_list ':' type
6536 | name ',' name_list
6541 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
6542 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
6543 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
6544 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is @acronym{LR}(1).
6546 @cindex @acronym{LR}(1)
6547 @cindex @acronym{LALR}(1)
6548 However, Bison, like most parser generators, cannot actually handle all
6549 @acronym{LR}(1) grammars. In this grammar, two contexts, that after
6551 at the beginning of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of
6552 a @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
6553 same. They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
6554 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
6555 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
6556 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
6557 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
6558 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
6559 occurrence means that the grammar is not @acronym{LALR}(1).
6561 In general, it is better to fix deficiencies than to document them. But
6562 this particular deficiency is intrinsically hard to fix; parser
6563 generators that can handle @acronym{LR}(1) grammars are hard to write
6565 produce parsers that are very large. In practice, Bison is more useful
6568 When the problem arises, you can often fix it by identifying the two
6569 parser states that are being confused, and adding something to make them
6570 look distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
6571 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
6582 /* This rule is never used. */
6588 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
6589 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
6590 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
6591 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
6592 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
6593 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
6595 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
6596 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
6597 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
6598 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
6599 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
6600 rather than the one for @code{name}.
6605 | name_list ':' type
6613 For a more detailed exposition of @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers and parser
6614 generators, please see:
6615 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of
6616 @acronym{LALR}(1) Look-Ahead Sets, @cite{@acronym{ACM} Transactions on
6617 Programming Languages and Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982),
6618 pp.@: 615--649 @uref{http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/69622.357187}.
6620 @node Generalized LR Parsing
6621 @section Generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) Parsing
6622 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
6623 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
6624 @cindex ambiguous grammars
6625 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
6627 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
6628 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
6629 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
6630 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
6631 context-free languages.
6632 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
6633 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
6634 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
6635 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
6636 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
6637 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mystery Conflicts}),
6638 there are languages where Bison's particular choice of how to
6639 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
6641 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
6642 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
6643 Generalized @acronym{LR} (or @acronym{GLR}). A Bison @acronym{GLR}
6644 parser uses the same basic
6645 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
6646 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
6647 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
6648 reduce-reduce conflict. When a @acronym{GLR} parser encounters such a
6650 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
6651 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
6652 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
6653 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
6654 a Bison @acronym{GLR} parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
6656 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
6657 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
6658 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
6659 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
6660 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
6661 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
6662 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
6663 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
6664 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
6665 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
6666 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
6669 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
6670 states to having one, it reverts to the normal @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing
6671 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
6672 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
6673 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
6674 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
6675 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
6676 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
6677 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
6678 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
6679 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
6680 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
6682 It is possible to use a data structure for the @acronym{GLR} parsing tree that
6683 permits the processing of any @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar in linear time (in the
6684 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
6685 @acronym{LALR}(1)) grammar in
6686 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
6687 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
6688 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
6689 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
6690 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
6691 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
6692 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
6693 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
6694 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
6695 structure should generally be adequate. On @acronym{LALR}(1) portions of a
6696 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the default
6699 For a more detailed exposition of @acronym{GLR} parsers, please see: Elizabeth
6700 Scott, Adrian Johnstone and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain, Tomita-Style
6701 Generalised @acronym{LR} Parsers, Royal Holloway, University of
6702 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12,
6703 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps},
6706 @node Memory Management
6707 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
6708 @cindex memory exhaustion
6709 @cindex memory management
6710 @cindex stack overflow
6711 @cindex parser stack overflow
6712 @cindex overflow of parser stack
6714 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
6715 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
6716 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
6718 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
6719 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
6720 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
6723 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
6724 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
6725 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
6726 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
6728 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
6729 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
6730 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
6731 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
6732 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
6733 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
6735 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
6736 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
6737 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
6740 @cindex default stack limit
6741 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
6745 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
6746 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the C
6747 @acronym{LALR}(1) parser, this value must be a compile-time constant
6748 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
6749 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
6751 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
6753 @c FIXME: C++ output.
6754 Because of semantical differences between C and C++, the
6755 @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
6756 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
6757 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
6758 this deficiency in a future release.
6760 @node Error Recovery
6761 @chapter Error Recovery
6762 @cindex error recovery
6763 @cindex recovery from errors
6765 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
6766 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
6767 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
6770 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
6771 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
6772 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
6773 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
6774 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
6775 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
6776 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
6779 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
6780 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
6781 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
6782 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
6783 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
6784 in the current context, the parse can continue.
6789 stmnts: /* empty string */
6795 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
6796 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
6798 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
6799 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
6800 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
6801 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
6802 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
6803 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
6804 applicable in the ordinary way.
6806 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
6807 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
6808 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
6809 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
6810 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
6811 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
6812 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
6813 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
6814 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
6815 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
6816 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
6817 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
6819 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
6820 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
6821 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
6824 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
6827 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
6828 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
6829 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
6830 spurious error message:
6833 primary: '(' expr ')'
6839 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
6840 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
6841 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
6842 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
6843 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
6844 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
6845 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
6848 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
6849 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
6850 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
6851 error messages resume.
6853 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
6854 as any other rules can.
6857 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
6858 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
6859 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
6860 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
6863 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
6864 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
6865 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
6867 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6869 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
6870 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
6871 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
6872 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
6873 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
6875 @vindex YYRECOVERING
6876 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6877 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6878 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
6881 @node Context Dependency
6882 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
6884 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
6885 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
6886 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
6887 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
6891 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
6892 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
6893 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
6894 error recovery rules must be written.
6897 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
6898 neither clean nor robust.)
6900 @node Semantic Tokens
6901 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
6903 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
6904 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
6910 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
6911 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
6912 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
6914 The method used in @acronym{GNU} C is to have two different token types,
6915 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
6916 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
6917 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
6918 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
6920 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
6921 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
6922 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
6923 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
6924 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
6925 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
6926 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
6928 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
6929 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
6930 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
6931 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
6935 typedef int foo, bar;
6938 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
6939 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
6944 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
6945 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
6947 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
6948 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
6949 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
6950 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
6951 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
6955 declarator maybeasm '='
6957 | declarator maybeasm
6961 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
6963 | notype_declarator maybeasm
6968 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
6969 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
6970 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
6972 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
6973 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
6974 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
6975 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
6976 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
6977 the syntactic context.
6979 @node Lexical Tie-ins
6980 @section Lexical Tie-ins
6981 @cindex lexical tie-in
6983 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
6984 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
6987 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
6988 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
6989 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
6990 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
6991 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
6998 void yyerror (char const *);
7012 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7026 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7027 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7028 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7030 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the parser file
7031 is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue, ,The Prologue}).
7032 You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey the flag.
7034 @node Tie-in Recovery
7035 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7037 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7038 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7040 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7041 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7042 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7043 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7047 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7054 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7055 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7056 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7057 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7058 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7060 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7062 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7063 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7064 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7076 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7077 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7078 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7079 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7081 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7082 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7083 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7084 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7085 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7086 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7089 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7092 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7094 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
7095 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
7096 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
7097 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
7098 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
7099 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
7102 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7103 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7107 @section Understanding Your Parser
7109 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
7110 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
7111 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
7112 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
7113 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
7115 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
7116 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
7117 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
7118 the parser output file name, and adding @samp{.output} instead.
7119 Therefore, if the input file is @file{foo.y}, then the parser file is
7120 called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As a consequence, the verbose
7121 output file is called @file{foo.output}.
7123 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
7140 @command{bison} reports:
7143 calc.y: warning: 1 useless nonterminal and 1 useless rule
7144 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: useless nonterminal: useless
7145 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: useless rule: useless: STR
7146 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
7149 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
7150 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
7151 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
7152 interpretation is the same.
7154 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
7155 to precedence and/or associativity:
7158 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
7159 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
7160 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
7165 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
7168 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7169 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7170 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7171 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
7175 @cindex token, useless
7176 @cindex useless token
7177 @cindex nonterminal, useless
7178 @cindex useless nonterminal
7179 @cindex rule, useless
7180 @cindex useless rule
7181 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
7182 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
7183 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
7184 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``not used''
7188 Useless nonterminals:
7191 Terminals which are not used:
7199 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
7205 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
7206 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
7207 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
7208 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
7209 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
7214 and reports the uses of the symbols:
7217 Terminals, with rules where they appear
7227 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
7232 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
7237 @cindex pointed rule
7238 @cindex rule, pointed
7239 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
7240 with it set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
7241 item is a production rule together with a point (marked by @samp{.})
7242 that the input cursor.
7247 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7249 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7254 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
7255 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
7256 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
7257 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
7258 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
7259 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted on
7260 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
7261 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
7263 @cindex core, item set
7264 @cindex item set core
7265 @cindex kernel, item set
7266 @cindex item set core
7267 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
7268 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
7269 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
7270 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
7271 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
7272 @option{--report=itemset} to list all the items, include those that can
7278 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7279 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
7280 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
7281 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
7282 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
7283 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
7285 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7296 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
7298 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
7302 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
7303 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
7304 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
7305 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
7310 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
7311 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7312 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7313 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7314 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7316 $ shift, and go to state 3
7317 '+' shift, and go to state 4
7318 '-' shift, and go to state 5
7319 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7320 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7324 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
7325 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead if
7326 @samp{+}, it will be shifted on the parse stack, and the automaton
7327 control will jump to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp
7328 '+' . exp}. Since there is no default action, any other token than
7329 those listed above will trigger a syntax error.
7331 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
7337 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
7343 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
7344 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
7346 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
7352 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
7354 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7360 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
7362 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7368 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
7370 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7376 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
7378 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7383 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
7389 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7390 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
7391 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7392 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7393 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7395 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7396 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7398 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
7399 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
7402 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
7403 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
7404 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
7405 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
7406 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
7407 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
7408 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
7409 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
7411 Because in @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
7412 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7413 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
7416 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
7417 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
7418 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
7419 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
7420 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
7421 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
7422 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
7423 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
7424 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
7425 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
7426 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
7427 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
7432 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7433 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
7434 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7435 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7436 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7438 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7439 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7441 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
7442 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
7445 The remaining states are similar:
7450 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7451 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7452 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
7453 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7454 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7456 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7457 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7459 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
7460 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
7464 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7465 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7466 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7467 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
7468 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7470 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7472 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
7473 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
7477 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7478 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7479 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7480 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7481 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
7483 '+' shift, and go to state 4
7484 '-' shift, and go to state 5
7485 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7486 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7488 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7489 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7490 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7491 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7492 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
7496 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
7497 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
7498 @samp{*}, but also because the
7499 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
7503 @section Tracing Your Parser
7506 @cindex tracing the parser
7508 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
7509 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
7511 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
7514 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
7516 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
7517 parser. This is compliant with @acronym{POSIX} Yacc. You could use
7518 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
7519 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
7522 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
7523 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
7524 ,Invoking Bison}). This is @acronym{POSIX} compliant too.
7526 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
7528 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
7529 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
7530 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
7531 preprocessor. Unless @acronym{POSIX} and Yacc portability matter to
7533 the preferred solution.
7536 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
7539 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
7540 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
7541 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
7542 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
7543 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
7544 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
7546 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
7547 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
7548 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
7549 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
7551 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
7552 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
7553 messages tell you these things:
7557 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
7560 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
7561 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
7564 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
7565 of the state stack afterward.
7568 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
7569 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
7570 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
7571 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
7572 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
7573 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
7574 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
7575 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
7576 grammar are to blame.
7578 The parser file is a C program and you can use C debuggers on it, but it's
7579 not easy to interpret what it is doing. The parser function is a
7580 finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from the actions it executes
7581 the same code over and over. Only the values of variables show where in
7582 the grammar it is working.
7585 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
7586 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
7587 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
7588 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
7589 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
7590 value (from @code{yylval}).
7592 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
7593 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Decl, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
7597 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
7598 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
7601 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
7604 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
7607 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
7608 else if (type == NUM)
7609 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
7613 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
7616 @chapter Invoking Bison
7617 @cindex invoking Bison
7618 @cindex Bison invocation
7619 @cindex options for invoking Bison
7621 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
7627 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
7628 @samp{.y}. The parser file's name is made by replacing the @samp{.y}
7629 with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory. Thus, the
7630 @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields
7631 @file{foo.tab.c}, and the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields
7632 @file{foo.tab.c}. It's also possible, in case you are writing
7633 C++ code instead of C in your grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp}
7634 or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the output files will take an extension like
7635 the given one as input (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and
7636 @file{foo.tab.c++}).
7637 This feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
7638 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
7643 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
7646 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
7649 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
7652 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
7654 For compatibility with @acronym{POSIX}, the standard Bison
7655 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
7656 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
7659 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
7660 in alphabetical order by short options.
7661 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
7662 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
7666 @section Bison Options
7668 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
7669 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
7670 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
7671 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
7672 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
7675 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
7676 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
7679 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
7685 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
7689 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
7691 @item --print-localedir
7692 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
7694 @item --print-datadir
7695 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
7699 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause
7700 different diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in
7701 other minor ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output
7702 file name conventions, so that the parser output file is called
7703 @file{y.tab.c}, and the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and
7705 Also, if generating an @acronym{LALR}(1) parser in C, generate @code{#define}
7706 statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate token numbers with token
7708 Thus, the following shell script can substitute for Yacc, and the Bison
7709 distribution contains such a script for compatibility with @acronym{POSIX}:
7716 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
7717 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
7718 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
7719 this option is specified.
7729 In the parser file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 if it is not
7730 already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
7731 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
7733 @item -L @var{language}
7734 @itemx --language=@var{language}
7735 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
7736 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
7737 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C and C++.
7738 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
7741 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7743 @item -p @var{prefix}
7744 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
7745 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
7746 @xref{Decl Summary}.
7750 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser file.
7751 Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser file so that the C compiler
7752 and debuggers will associate errors with your source file, the
7753 grammar file. This option causes them to associate errors with the
7754 parser file, treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
7757 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
7758 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
7759 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
7761 You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
7762 You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
7763 different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
7764 choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
7766 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
7767 file in the Bison installation directory.
7768 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
7769 current working directory.
7770 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
7773 @itemx --token-table
7774 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7783 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
7784 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
7785 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7787 @item --defines=@var{defines-file}
7788 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
7790 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
7791 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
7792 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
7793 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7795 @item -r @var{things}
7796 @itemx --report=@var{things}
7797 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
7798 separated list of @var{things} among:
7802 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
7803 @acronym{LALR} automaton.
7806 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
7807 each rule's lookahead set.
7810 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
7811 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
7816 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
7817 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
7818 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7821 @itemx --output=@var{file}
7822 Specify the @var{file} for the parser file.
7824 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
7825 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
7828 Output a graphical representation of the @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar
7829 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
7830 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, @acronym{DOT}} format.
7831 If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will
7834 @item --graph=@var{graph-file}
7835 The behavior of @var{--graph} is the same than @samp{-g}. The only
7836 difference is that it has an optional argument which is the name of
7837 the output graph file.
7840 @node Option Cross Key
7841 @section Option Cross Key
7843 @c FIXME: How about putting the directives too?
7844 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
7845 the corresponding short option.
7847 @multitable {@option{--defines=@var{defines-file}}} {@option{-b @var{file-prefix}XXX}}
7848 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option
7849 @item @option{--debug} @tab @option{-t}
7850 @item @option{--defines=@var{defines-file}} @tab @option{-d}
7851 @item @option{--file-prefix=@var{prefix}} @tab @option{-b @var{file-prefix}}
7852 @item @option{--graph=@var{graph-file}} @tab @option{-d}
7853 @item @option{--help} @tab @option{-h}
7854 @item @option{--name-prefix=@var{prefix}} @tab @option{-p @var{name-prefix}}
7855 @item @option{--no-lines} @tab @option{-l}
7856 @item @option{--output=@var{outfile}} @tab @option{-o @var{outfile}}
7857 @item @option{--print-localedir} @tab
7858 @item @option{--print-datadir} @tab
7859 @item @option{--token-table} @tab @option{-k}
7860 @item @option{--verbose} @tab @option{-v}
7861 @item @option{--version} @tab @option{-V}
7862 @item @option{--yacc} @tab @option{-y}
7866 @section Yacc Library
7868 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
7869 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
7870 implementations are normally not useful, but @acronym{POSIX} requires
7871 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
7872 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
7873 library is distributed under the terms of the @acronym{GNU} General
7874 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
7876 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
7877 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
7880 int yyerror (char const *);
7883 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
7884 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
7885 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
7891 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
7893 @node Other Languages
7894 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
7897 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
7898 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
7902 @section C++ Parsers
7905 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
7906 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
7907 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
7908 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
7909 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
7910 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
7913 @node C++ Bison Interface
7914 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
7915 @c - %language "C++"
7919 The C++ @acronym{LALR}(1) parser is selected using the language directive,
7920 @samp{%language "C++"}, or the synonymous command-line option
7921 @option{--language=c++}.
7922 @xref{Decl Summary}.
7924 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
7926 @findex %define namespace
7927 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace name, see
7929 The various classes are generated in the following files:
7934 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
7935 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
7938 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
7941 @itemx @var{file}.cc
7942 (Assuming the extension of the input file was @samp{.yy}.) The
7943 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
7944 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
7945 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
7947 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
7948 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
7949 @samp{%defines} directive.
7952 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
7953 for a complete and accurate documentation.
7955 @node C++ Semantic Values
7956 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
7957 @c - No objects in unions
7959 @c - Printer and destructor
7961 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
7962 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
7963 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
7964 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
7965 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
7968 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
7969 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
7970 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
7972 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
7973 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
7974 to such objects are allowed.
7977 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
7978 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
7979 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
7983 @node C++ Location Values
7984 @subsection C++ Location Values
7988 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
7990 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
7991 location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}. Two
7992 auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point in a file,
7993 and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
7994 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files).
7996 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
7997 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
7998 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
7999 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
8000 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
8003 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
8004 The line, starting at 1.
8007 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8008 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
8011 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
8012 The column, starting at 0.
8015 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8016 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
8019 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8020 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8021 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8022 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8023 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
8026 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
8027 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
8028 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
8029 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
8032 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
8033 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
8034 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8037 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8038 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8039 Advance the @code{end} position.
8042 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
8043 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
8044 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
8045 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
8048 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
8049 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
8053 @node C++ Parser Interface
8054 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
8055 @c - define parser_class_name
8057 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8059 @c - Reporting errors
8061 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
8062 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
8063 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
8064 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
8065 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
8066 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
8067 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
8068 additional argument for its constructor.
8070 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_value_type}
8071 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_value_type}
8072 The types for semantics value and locations.
8075 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8076 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
8077 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
8080 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
8081 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
8084 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
8085 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
8086 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
8090 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
8091 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
8092 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
8093 or nonzero, full tracing.
8096 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
8097 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
8098 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
8099 described by @var{m}.
8103 @node C++ Scanner Interface
8104 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
8105 @c - prefix for yylex.
8106 @c - Pure interface to yylex
8109 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
8110 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
8111 @code{%pure-parser} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
8113 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_value_type& @var{yylval}, location_type& @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8114 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8115 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
8116 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
8120 @node A Complete C++ Example
8121 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
8123 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
8124 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
8125 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
8126 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
8127 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
8128 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
8129 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
8130 actually easier to interface with.
8133 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
8134 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
8135 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
8136 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
8137 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
8140 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8141 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8143 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
8144 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
8145 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
8146 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
8147 of valid input follows.
8151 seven := one + two * three
8155 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
8156 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
8158 @c - A place to store error messages
8159 @c - A place for the result
8161 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
8162 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
8163 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
8164 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
8165 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
8166 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
8167 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
8169 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
8170 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
8171 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
8174 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8176 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8177 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8180 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
8185 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
8186 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
8187 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
8188 factor both as follows.
8190 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8192 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
8194 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
8195 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
8196 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
8197 calcxx_driver& driver)
8198 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
8203 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
8206 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8208 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
8213 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
8215 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
8221 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
8222 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
8224 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8226 // Handling the scanner.
8229 bool trace_scanning;
8233 Similarly for the parser itself.
8235 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8237 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
8238 int parse (const std::string& f);
8244 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
8245 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
8246 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
8247 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
8249 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8252 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
8253 void error (const std::string& m);
8255 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8258 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
8259 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
8260 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
8261 messages and set error state.
8263 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
8265 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
8266 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
8268 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
8269 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
8271 variables["one"] = 1;
8272 variables["two"] = 2;
8275 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
8280 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
8284 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
8285 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
8286 int res = parser.parse ();
8292 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
8294 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
8298 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
8300 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
8305 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
8307 The parser definition file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for
8308 the C++ LALR(1) skeleton, the creation of the parser header file, and
8309 specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
8310 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
8313 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8315 %language "C++" /* -*- C++ -*- */
8316 %require "@value{VERSION}"
8318 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
8322 @findex %code requires
8323 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
8324 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
8325 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
8326 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
8327 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
8328 use a forward declaration of the driver.
8329 @xref{Decl Summary, ,%code}.
8331 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8335 class calcxx_driver;
8340 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
8341 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
8344 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8346 // The parsing context.
8347 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
8348 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
8352 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
8353 first location's file name. Afterwards new locations are computed
8354 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
8355 automatically propagated.
8357 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8362 // Initialize the initial location.
8363 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
8368 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose
8371 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8378 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
8381 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8393 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
8394 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
8396 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8399 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
8405 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
8406 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
8407 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
8408 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
8411 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8413 %token END 0 "end of file"
8415 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
8416 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
8421 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
8424 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
8425 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8427 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
8428 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
8430 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <ival>
8434 The grammar itself is straightforward.
8436 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8440 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
8442 assignments: assignments assignment @{@}
8443 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
8446 "identifier" ":=" exp
8447 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
8451 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
8452 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
8453 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
8454 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
8455 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
8456 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
8461 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
8464 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8467 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
8468 const std::string& m)
8470 driver.error (l, m);
8474 @node Calc++ Scanner
8475 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
8477 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
8478 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
8480 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8482 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
8485 # include <limits.h>
8487 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
8488 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
8490 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
8491 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
8492 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
8493 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
8497 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
8498 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
8499 not of token_type. */
8500 #define yyterminate() return token::END
8505 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
8506 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
8507 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
8508 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
8510 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8512 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
8516 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
8518 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8520 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
8526 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
8527 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
8528 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
8529 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
8530 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
8531 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
8532 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
8534 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8537 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
8543 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
8544 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
8548 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
8549 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
8550 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
8551 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
8553 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8556 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
8558 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
8559 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
8560 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
8563 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
8564 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
8565 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
8567 return token::NUMBER;
8569 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
8570 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
8575 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
8576 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
8578 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8581 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
8583 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
8586 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
8588 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file);
8594 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
8600 @node Calc++ Top Level
8601 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
8603 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
8605 @comment file: calc++.cc
8608 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
8611 main (int argc, char *argv[])
8613 calcxx_driver driver;
8614 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
8615 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
8616 driver.trace_parsing = true;
8617 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
8618 driver.trace_scanning = true;
8619 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
8620 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
8625 @section Java Parsers
8628 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
8629 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
8630 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
8631 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8632 * Java Scanner Interface:: Java scanners, and pure parsers
8633 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
8636 @node Java Bison Interface
8637 @subsection Java Bison Interface
8638 @c - %language "Java"
8641 The Java parser skeletons are selected using a language directive,
8642 @samp{%language "Java"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8643 @option{--language=java}.
8645 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities whose name
8646 starts with @samp{YY}. Use the @samp{%name-prefix} directive to
8647 change the prefix, see @ref{Decl Summary}; classes can be placed
8648 in an arbitrary Java package using a @samp{%define package} section.
8650 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
8651 for location tracking. If the parser is pure, it also defines an
8652 inner interface, @code{Lexer}; see~@ref{Java Scanner Interface} for the
8653 meaning of pure parsers when the Java language is chosen. Other than
8654 these inner class/interface, and the members described in~@ref{Java
8655 Parser Interface}, all the other members and fields are preceded
8656 with a @code{yy} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
8658 No header file can be generated for Java parsers; you must not pass
8659 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, nor use the
8660 @samp{%defines} directive.
8662 By default, the @samp{YYParser} class has package visibility. A
8663 declaration @samp{%define "public"} will change to public visibility.
8664 Remember that, according to the Java language specification, the name
8665 of the @file{.java} file should match the name of the class in this
8668 Similarly, a declaration @samp{%define "abstract"} will make your
8671 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
8673 @node Java Semantic Values
8674 @subsection Java Semantic Values
8675 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
8677 @c - Printer and destructor
8679 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
8680 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
8681 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
8684 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
8685 %type <Integer> number
8688 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
8689 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
8690 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
8691 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define} directive.
8692 For example, after the following declaration:
8695 %define "stype" "ASTNode"
8699 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
8700 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
8702 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
8703 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
8704 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
8706 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
8707 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
8708 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
8710 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
8711 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
8712 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
8715 @node Java Location Values
8716 @subsection Java Location Values
8721 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser
8722 supports location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
8723 An auxiliary user-defined class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point
8724 in a file; Bison itself defines a class representing a @dfn{location},
8725 a range composed of a pair of positions (possibly spanning several
8726 files). The location class is an inner class of the parser; the name
8727 is @code{Location} by default, may also be renamed using @code{%define
8728 "location_type" "@var{class-name}}.
8730 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
8731 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
8732 with @code{%define "position_type" "@var{class-name}"}.
8735 @deftypemethod {Location} {Position} begin
8736 @deftypemethodx {Location} {Position} end
8737 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8740 @deftypemethod {Location} {void} toString ()
8741 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
8742 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
8743 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
8747 @node Java Parser Interface
8748 @subsection Java Parser Interface
8749 @c - define parser_class_name
8751 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8753 @c - Reporting errors
8755 The output file defines the parser class in the package optionally
8756 indicated in the @code{%define package} section. The class name defaults
8757 to @code{YYParser}. The @code{YY} prefix may be changed using
8758 @samp{%name-prefix}; alternatively, you can use @samp{%define
8759 "parser_class_name" "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to the class.
8760 The interface of this class is detailed below. It can be extended using
8761 the @code{%parse-param} directive; each occurrence of the directive will
8762 add a field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor.
8764 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8765 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
8766 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
8769 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
8770 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
8771 @code{false} otherwise.
8774 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
8775 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
8776 from a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
8779 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
8780 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
8781 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
8785 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
8786 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
8787 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
8788 or nonzero, full tracing.
8791 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} error (Location @var{l}, String @var{m})
8792 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user
8793 in the same way as the scanner interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
8794 Interface}); the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at
8795 @var{l}, described by @var{m}.
8799 @node Java Scanner Interface
8800 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
8803 @c - Lexer interface
8805 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
8806 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
8807 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
8808 directive does not do anything when used in Java.
8810 The scanner always resides in a separate class than the parser.
8811 Still, Java also two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java
8812 parser with a scanner, that is, the scanner may reside in a separate file
8813 than the Bison grammar, or in the same file. The interface
8814 to the scanner is similar in the two cases.
8816 In the first case, where the scanner in the same file as the grammar, the
8817 scanner code has to be placed in @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want
8818 to pass parameters from the parser constructor to the scanner constructor,
8819 specify them with @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before
8820 @code{%parse-param}s to the constructor.
8822 In the second case, the scanner has to implement interface @code{Lexer},
8823 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
8824 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
8825 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
8828 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
8830 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{l}, String @var{m})
8831 As explained in @pxref{Java Parser Interface}, this method is defined
8832 by the user to emit an error message. The first parameter is omitted
8833 if location tracking is not active. Its type can be changed using
8834 @samp{%define "location_type" "@var{class-name}".}
8837 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8838 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8839 value and location are saved and returned by the ther methods in the
8840 interface. Invocations of @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1}
8841 @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
8844 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
8845 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
8846 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
8847 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
8848 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
8850 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define "position_type"
8851 "@var{class-name}".}
8854 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
8855 Return respectively the first position of the last token that yylex
8856 returned, and the first position beyond it.
8858 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define "stype"
8859 "@var{class-name}".}
8863 If @code{%pure-parser} is not specified, the lexer interface
8864 resides in the same class (@code{YYParser}) as the Bison-generated
8865 parser. The fields and methods that are provided to
8866 this end are as follows.
8868 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} error (Location @var{l}, String @var{m})
8869 As explained in @pxref{Java Parser Interface}, this method is defined
8870 by the user to emit an error message. The first parameter is not used
8871 unless location tracking is active. Its type can be changed using
8872 @samp{%define "location_type" "@var{class-name}".}
8875 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} yylex (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8876 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8877 value and location are saved into @code{yylval}, @code{yystartpos},
8878 @code{yyendpos}. Invocations of @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1}
8879 @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
8882 @deftypecv {Field} {YYParser} Position yystartpos
8883 @deftypecvx {Field} {YYParser} Position yyendpos
8884 Contain respectively the first position of the last token that yylex
8885 returned, and the first position beyond it. These methods are not
8886 needed unless location tracking is active.
8888 The field's type can be changed using @samp{%define "position_type"
8889 "@var{class-name}".}
8892 @deftypecv {Field} {YYParser} Object yylval
8893 Return respectively the first position of the last token that yylex
8894 returned, and the first position beyond it.
8896 The field's type can be changed using @samp{%define "stype"
8897 "@var{class-name}".}
8900 @node Java Differences
8901 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
8903 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
8904 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
8905 section summarizes these differences.
8909 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
8910 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
8911 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
8912 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
8913 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
8914 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
8916 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
8917 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
8918 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
8919 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
8920 corresponds to these C macros.}.
8923 The prolog declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
8925 @item @code{%code imports}
8926 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
8927 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
8928 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
8930 @item unqualified @code{%code}
8931 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
8933 @item @code{%code lexer}
8934 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
8935 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
8936 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
8940 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
8941 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
8942 be used to define other classes used by the parser.
8945 @c ================================================= FAQ
8948 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
8949 @cindex frequently asked questions
8952 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
8956 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
8957 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
8958 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
8959 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
8960 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
8961 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison @acronym{POSIX} safe?
8962 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
8963 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
8964 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
8965 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
8966 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
8967 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
8970 @node Memory Exhausted
8971 @section Memory Exhausted
8974 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
8975 message. What can I do?
8978 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
8981 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
8982 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
8984 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
8985 following typical questions:
8988 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
8989 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
8990 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
8997 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
8998 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
8999 although I did specify I needed a @code{%pure-parser}.
9002 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
9003 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
9004 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
9005 demonstration, consider the following source file,
9006 @file{first-line.l}:
9014 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
9017 yyparse (char const *file)
9019 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
9022 /* One token only. */
9024 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
9039 If the file @file{input} contains
9047 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
9050 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
9051 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
9052 $ @kbd{./first-line}
9057 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
9058 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
9059 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
9060 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
9061 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
9062 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
9063 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
9064 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
9067 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
9068 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
9069 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
9070 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
9072 @node Strings are Destroyed
9073 @section Strings are Destroyed
9076 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
9077 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
9078 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
9081 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
9082 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
9083 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
9088 char *yylval = NULL;
9091 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
9097 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
9098 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
9099 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
9100 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
9105 If you compile and run this code, you get:
9108 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
9109 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
9110 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
9116 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
9117 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
9118 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
9119 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
9120 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
9121 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
9124 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
9125 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
9126 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
9131 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
9132 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
9135 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
9136 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
9139 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
9140 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
9141 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
9142 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
9143 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
9144 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
9145 execute simple instructions one after the others.
9147 @cindex abstract syntax tree
9148 @cindex @acronym{AST}
9149 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
9150 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
9151 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
9152 or @dfn{@acronym{AST}} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
9153 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
9154 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
9157 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
9158 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
9161 @node Multiple start-symbols
9162 @section Multiple start-symbols
9165 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
9166 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
9167 multiple entry points.
9170 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
9171 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
9172 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
9173 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
9177 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
9179 start: START_FOO foo
9183 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
9184 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
9186 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
9187 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
9188 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
9189 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
9190 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
9191 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
9192 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
9193 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
9201 int t = start_token;
9206 /* @r{The rules.} */
9210 @node Secure? Conform?
9211 @section Secure? Conform?
9214 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
9217 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
9218 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
9219 @acronym{POSIX} specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
9220 please send us a bug report.
9222 @node I can't build Bison
9223 @section I can't build Bison
9226 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
9227 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
9231 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
9232 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
9233 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
9234 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
9235 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
9236 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
9237 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
9240 @node Where can I find help?
9241 @section Where can I find help?
9244 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
9247 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
9248 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
9249 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
9250 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
9251 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
9252 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
9253 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
9254 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
9258 @section Bug Reports
9261 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
9264 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
9265 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
9266 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
9267 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
9268 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
9270 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
9271 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
9272 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
9273 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
9274 easier it will be to fix the bug.
9276 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
9277 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
9278 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
9279 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
9280 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
9281 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
9283 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
9284 send a bug report just because you can not provide a fix.
9286 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
9288 @node More Languages
9289 @section More Languages
9292 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
9293 favorite language here}?
9296 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
9297 languages; contributions are welcome.
9300 @section Beta Testing
9303 What is involved in being a beta tester?
9306 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
9307 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
9308 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
9309 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
9310 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
9311 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
9314 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
9315 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
9316 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
9317 systems are especially welcome.
9320 @section Mailing Lists
9323 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
9326 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
9328 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
9330 @node Table of Symbols
9331 @appendix Bison Symbols
9332 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
9333 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
9335 @deffn {Variable} @@$
9336 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
9337 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
9340 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
9341 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand
9342 side of the rule. @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
9345 @deffn {Variable} $$
9346 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
9350 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
9351 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
9352 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
9355 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
9356 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
9357 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
9358 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
9361 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
9362 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
9363 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied directly to
9364 the output file uninterpreted. Such code forms the prologue of the input
9365 file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
9369 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
9370 Comment delimiters, as in C.
9373 @deffn {Delimiter} :
9374 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
9378 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
9379 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
9382 @deffn {Delimiter} |
9383 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
9384 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
9387 @deffn {Directive} <*>
9388 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
9391 This feature is experimental.
9392 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
9395 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
9398 @deffn {Directive} <>
9399 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
9402 This feature is experimental.
9403 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
9406 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
9409 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
9410 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
9411 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
9412 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
9415 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
9416 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
9417 Insert @var{code} verbatim into output parser source.
9418 @xref{Decl Summary,,%code}.
9421 @deffn {Directive} %debug
9422 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9425 @deffn {Directive} %debug
9426 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9430 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
9431 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
9432 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
9437 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{define-variable}
9438 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} @var{value}
9439 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior.
9440 @xref{Decl Summary,,%define}.
9443 @deffn {Directive} %defines
9444 Bison declaration to create a header file meant for the scanner.
9445 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9448 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
9449 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
9450 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9453 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
9454 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
9455 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
9458 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
9459 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
9460 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
9461 @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
9464 @deffn {Symbol} $end
9465 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
9466 used in the grammar.
9469 @deffn {Symbol} error
9470 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
9471 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
9472 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
9473 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
9474 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
9475 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
9476 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
9477 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9480 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
9481 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
9482 when @code{yyerror} is called.
9485 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9486 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
9490 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
9491 Bison declaration to produce a @acronym{GLR} parser. @xref{GLR
9492 Parsers, ,Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
9495 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
9496 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
9499 @deffn {Directive} %language
9500 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
9501 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9504 @deffn {Directive} %left
9505 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
9506 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
9509 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
9510 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
9511 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
9515 @deffn {Directive} %merge
9516 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
9517 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
9518 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
9519 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
9522 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9523 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9527 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
9528 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
9529 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
9534 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
9535 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
9536 parser file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9539 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
9540 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
9541 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
9544 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
9545 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser file. @xref{Decl
9549 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
9550 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
9551 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
9552 Function @code{yyparse}}.
9555 @deffn {Directive} %prec
9556 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
9557 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
9560 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
9561 Bison declaration to request a pure (reentrant) parser.
9562 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
9565 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
9566 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
9567 Require a Version of Bison}.
9570 @deffn {Directive} %right
9571 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
9572 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
9575 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
9576 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
9577 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9580 @deffn {Directive} %start
9581 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
9585 @deffn {Directive} %token
9586 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
9587 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
9590 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
9591 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser file.
9592 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9595 @deffn {Directive} %type
9596 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
9597 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
9600 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
9601 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
9602 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
9606 @deffn {Directive} %union
9607 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
9608 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
9611 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
9612 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
9613 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
9614 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
9615 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
9617 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
9621 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
9622 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
9623 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
9624 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
9626 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
9630 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
9631 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
9632 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
9635 @deffn {Variable} yychar
9636 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
9637 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
9638 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
9639 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
9642 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
9643 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
9644 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
9647 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
9648 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
9649 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9652 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
9653 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
9654 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
9655 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9658 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
9659 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
9660 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
9663 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
9664 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
9665 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
9666 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
9667 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
9669 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
9673 @deffn {Function} yyerror
9674 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
9675 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
9676 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
9679 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
9680 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
9681 to request verbose, specific error message strings
9682 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
9683 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
9684 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred.
9687 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
9688 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
9689 @xref{Memory Management}.
9692 @deffn {Function} yylex
9693 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
9694 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
9698 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
9699 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
9700 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
9701 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
9702 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
9705 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
9706 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
9707 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
9708 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
9710 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
9712 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
9713 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
9714 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
9717 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
9718 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
9719 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
9722 @deffn {Variable} yylval
9723 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
9724 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
9725 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
9727 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
9728 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
9729 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
9732 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
9733 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
9737 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
9738 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
9739 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
9740 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
9741 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
9744 @deffn {Function} yyparse
9745 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
9746 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
9749 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
9750 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
9751 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
9752 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
9753 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
9756 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
9757 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
9758 call this function to create a new parser.
9759 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
9760 @code{yypstate_new}}.
9763 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
9764 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
9765 parse the rest of the input stream.
9766 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
9767 @code{yypull_parse}}.
9770 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
9771 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
9772 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
9773 @code{yypush_parse}}.
9776 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
9777 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
9778 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
9779 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
9780 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
9783 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
9784 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
9785 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
9786 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
9789 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
9790 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the C
9791 @acronym{LALR}(1) parser needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
9792 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
9793 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
9794 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
9795 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
9797 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
9798 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
9799 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
9800 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
9801 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
9802 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
9803 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
9806 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
9807 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
9808 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
9816 @item Backus-Naur Form (@acronym{BNF}; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
9817 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
9818 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
9819 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
9820 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
9822 @item Context-free grammars
9823 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
9824 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
9825 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
9826 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
9829 @item Dynamic allocation
9830 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
9831 compile time or on entry to a function.
9834 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
9835 character string of length zero.
9837 @item Finite-state stack machine
9838 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
9839 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
9840 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
9841 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
9842 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
9843 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
9845 @item Generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR})
9846 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
9847 that are not @acronym{LALR}(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
9848 usual @acronym{LALR}(1)
9849 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
9850 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
9851 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
9852 @acronym{LR} Parsing}.
9855 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
9856 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
9857 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
9859 @item Infix operator
9860 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
9861 performs some operation.
9864 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
9866 @item Language construct
9867 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
9868 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
9869 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
9871 @item Left associativity
9872 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
9873 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
9874 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
9876 @item Left recursion
9877 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
9878 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
9881 @item Left-to-right parsing
9882 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
9883 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
9885 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
9886 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
9887 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
9889 @item Lexical tie-in
9890 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
9891 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
9893 @item Literal string token
9894 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
9896 @item Lookahead token
9897 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
9900 @item @acronym{LALR}(1)
9901 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
9902 generators) can handle; a subset of @acronym{LR}(1). @xref{Mystery
9903 Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}.
9905 @item @acronym{LR}(1)
9906 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
9907 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
9909 @item Nonterminal symbol
9910 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
9911 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
9912 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
9915 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
9916 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
9919 @item Postfix operator
9920 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
9921 performs some operation.
9924 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
9925 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
9929 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
9930 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
9931 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
9933 @item Reverse polish notation
9934 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
9936 @item Right recursion
9937 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
9938 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
9942 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
9943 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
9944 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
9947 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
9948 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
9949 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
9951 @item Single-character literal
9952 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
9953 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
9956 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
9957 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
9958 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
9959 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
9962 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
9963 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
9964 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
9967 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
9968 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
9971 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
9972 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
9973 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
9974 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
9976 @item Terminal symbol
9977 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
9978 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
9979 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
9982 @node Copying This Manual
9983 @appendix Copying This Manual
9993 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout
9994 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex
9995 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry
9996 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa
9997 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc
9998 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Gen Comp Expr ltcalc mfcalc Decl Symtab yylex
9999 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref
10000 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex
10001 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge
10002 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG
10003 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit
10004 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok
10005 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln
10006 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym
10007 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof
10008 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum
10009 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype
10010 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs
10011 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES
10012 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param
10013 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP
10014 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword
10015 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH
10016 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype
10017 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args
10018 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill
10019 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll
10020 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST
10021 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex