1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
193 Outline of a Bison Grammar
195 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
201 Defining Language Semantics
203 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
227 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
228 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
229 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
230 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
231 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
232 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
234 Parser C-Language Interface
236 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
237 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
238 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
241 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
243 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
244 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
245 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
248 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
250 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
251 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
252 of the token it has read.
253 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
254 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
256 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
257 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
259 The Bison Parser Algorithm
261 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
262 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
263 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
264 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
265 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
266 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
267 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
268 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
269 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
270 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
274 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
275 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
276 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
277 * How Precedence:: How they work.
281 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
282 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
283 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
284 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
286 Handling Context Dependencies
288 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
289 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
290 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
291 error recovery rules must be written.
293 Debugging Your Parser
295 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
296 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
300 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
301 in alphabetical order by short options.
302 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
303 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
305 Parsers Written In Other Languages
307 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
308 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
312 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
313 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
314 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
315 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
316 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
317 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
319 A Complete C++ Example
321 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
322 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
323 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
324 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
325 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
329 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
330 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
331 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
332 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
333 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
334 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
335 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
336 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
338 Frequently Asked Questions
340 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
341 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
342 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
343 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
344 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
345 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
346 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
347 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
348 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
349 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
350 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
351 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
355 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
361 @unnumbered Introduction
364 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
365 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
366 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
367 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
368 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
369 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
370 calculators to complex programming languages.
372 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
373 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
374 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
375 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
376 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
379 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
380 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
381 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
382 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
385 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
386 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
387 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
388 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
389 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
390 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
393 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
396 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
398 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
399 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
400 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
401 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
402 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
404 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
406 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
407 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
408 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
409 License to all of the Bison source code.
411 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
412 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
413 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
414 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
415 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
416 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
417 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
419 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
420 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
421 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
422 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
423 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
424 using the other GNU tools.
426 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
427 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
428 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
429 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
433 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
434 @include gpl-3.0.texi
437 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
439 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
440 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
441 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
444 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
445 as mathematical ideas.
446 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
447 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
448 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
449 the name of an identifier, etc.).
450 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
451 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
452 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
453 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
454 how is the output used?
455 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
456 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
459 @node Language and Grammar
460 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
462 @cindex context-free grammar
463 @cindex grammar, context-free
464 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
465 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
466 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
467 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
468 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
469 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
470 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
471 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
475 @cindex Backus-Naur form
476 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
477 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
478 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
479 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
480 essentially machine-readable BNF.
482 @cindex LALR grammars
483 @cindex IELR grammars
485 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
486 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
487 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
488 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
489 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
490 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
491 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
492 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
493 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
494 Construction}, to learn how.
497 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
498 @cindex ambiguous grammars
499 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
501 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
502 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
503 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
504 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
505 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
506 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
507 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
508 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
509 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
510 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
511 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
512 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
513 possible parses of any given string is finite.
515 @cindex symbols (abstract)
517 @cindex syntactic grouping
518 @cindex grouping, syntactic
519 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
520 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
521 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
522 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
523 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
524 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
525 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
527 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
528 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
529 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
530 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
531 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
532 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
533 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
534 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
535 lexicography, not grammar.)
537 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
541 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
542 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
543 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
544 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
545 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
546 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
547 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
552 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
553 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
554 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
555 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
556 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
560 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
561 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
562 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
563 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
564 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
565 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
566 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
567 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
569 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
570 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
571 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
572 reads informally as follows:
575 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
580 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
584 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
585 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
586 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
587 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
590 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
591 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
592 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
593 not the start symbol.
595 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
596 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
597 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
598 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
599 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
600 reports a syntax error.
602 @node Grammar in Bison
603 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
604 @cindex Bison grammar
605 @cindex grammar, Bison
606 @cindex formal grammar
608 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
609 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
610 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
612 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
613 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
614 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
616 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
617 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
618 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
619 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
620 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
621 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
622 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
625 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
626 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
627 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
628 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
630 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
631 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
633 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
634 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
635 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
636 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
640 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
645 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
647 @node Semantic Values
648 @section Semantic Values
649 @cindex semantic value
650 @cindex value, semantic
652 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
653 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
654 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
655 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
656 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
659 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
660 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
661 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
662 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
663 ,Defining Language Semantics},
666 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
667 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
668 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
669 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
672 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
673 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
674 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
675 need to have any semantic value.)
677 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
678 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
679 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
680 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
681 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
682 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
684 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
685 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
686 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
687 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
688 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
690 @node Semantic Actions
691 @section Semantic Actions
692 @cindex semantic actions
693 @cindex actions, semantic
695 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
696 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
697 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
698 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
701 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
702 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
703 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
704 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
705 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
706 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
707 newly recognized larger expression.
709 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
713 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
718 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
719 from the values of the two subexpressions.
722 @section Writing GLR Parsers
724 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
727 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
728 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
730 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
731 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
732 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
733 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
734 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
735 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
736 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
737 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
738 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
740 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
741 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
742 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
743 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
744 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
745 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
746 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
747 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
748 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
749 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
750 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
751 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
752 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
753 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
754 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
755 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
756 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
757 identical set of symbols.
759 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
760 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
761 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
762 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
763 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
764 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
765 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
766 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
767 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
771 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
772 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
773 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
774 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
777 @node Simple GLR Parsers
778 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
779 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
780 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
784 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
785 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
787 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
788 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
789 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
791 Consider a problem that
792 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
793 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
796 type subrange = lo .. hi;
797 type enum = (a, b, c);
801 The original language standard allows only numeric
802 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
803 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
804 10206) and many other
805 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
806 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
810 type subrange = (a) .. b;
814 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
815 type with only one value:
822 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
823 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
825 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
826 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
827 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
828 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
829 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
830 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
831 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
832 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
834 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
835 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
836 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
837 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
840 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
841 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
842 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
843 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
844 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
845 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
848 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
849 use the GLR algorithm.
850 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
851 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
852 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
853 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
854 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
855 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
856 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
857 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
858 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
860 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
861 reports a syntax error as usual.
863 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
864 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
865 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
866 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
867 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
869 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
870 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
871 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
872 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
873 The present example contains only one conflict between two
874 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
875 cannot be nested. So the number of
876 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
877 and the parsing time is still linear.
879 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
880 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
883 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
893 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
898 type : '(' id_list ')'
920 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
921 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
922 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
923 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
930 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
931 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
932 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
941 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
942 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
943 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
944 notice when the parser splits.
946 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
947 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
948 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
949 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
950 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
951 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
952 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
953 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
954 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
955 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
956 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
957 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
958 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
961 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
962 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
963 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
964 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
965 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
966 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
968 @node Merging GLR Parses
969 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
970 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
971 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
975 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
977 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
982 #define YYSTYPE char const *
984 void yyerror (char const *);
997 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1000 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
1004 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1005 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1006 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1007 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1008 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1011 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
1012 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1013 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1014 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1017 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1018 | '(' declarator ')'
1023 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1024 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1031 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1032 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1033 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1034 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1035 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1036 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1037 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1038 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1039 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1040 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1041 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1042 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1043 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1044 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1046 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1047 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1048 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1049 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1050 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1051 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1052 The parser therefore prints
1055 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1058 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1059 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1066 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1067 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1068 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1069 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1070 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1071 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1072 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1073 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1074 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1075 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1081 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1082 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1083 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1084 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1088 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1089 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1094 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1098 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1106 with an accompanying forward declaration
1107 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1111 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1112 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1117 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1118 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1121 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1124 Bison requires that all of the
1125 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1126 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1127 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1128 the offending merge.
1130 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1131 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1133 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1134 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1135 the associated reduction.
1136 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1137 action in a GLR parser.
1140 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1142 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1144 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1145 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1146 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1147 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1148 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1149 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1150 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1151 influence syntax analysis.
1152 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1155 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1156 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1157 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1158 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1159 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1160 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1161 future versions of Bison.
1162 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1163 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1164 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1167 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1168 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1169 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1170 initiate error recovery.
1171 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1172 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1173 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1174 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1176 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1177 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1179 @node Compiler Requirements
1180 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1181 @cindex @code{inline}
1182 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1184 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1185 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1186 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1187 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1188 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1189 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1198 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1202 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1203 && ! defined inline)
1212 @cindex textual location
1213 @cindex location, textual
1215 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1216 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1217 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1218 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1220 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1221 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1222 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1223 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1226 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1227 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1228 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1231 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1232 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1233 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1234 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1235 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1236 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1237 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1240 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1241 @cindex Bison parser
1242 @cindex Bison utility
1243 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1246 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1247 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1248 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1249 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1250 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1251 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1252 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1255 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1256 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1257 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1260 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1261 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1262 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1263 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1264 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1265 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1266 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1268 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1269 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1270 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1271 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1272 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1273 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1274 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1275 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1276 C-Language Interface}.
1278 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1279 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1280 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1281 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1282 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1283 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1284 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1285 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1286 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1287 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1288 anything other than their usual meanings.
1290 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1291 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1292 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1293 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1294 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1295 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1296 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1297 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1298 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1301 @section Stages in Using Bison
1302 @cindex stages in using Bison
1305 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1306 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1310 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1311 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1312 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1313 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1314 sequence of C statements.
1317 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1318 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1319 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1320 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1323 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1326 Write error-reporting routines.
1329 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1330 must follow these steps:
1334 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1337 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1340 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1343 @node Grammar Layout
1344 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1345 @cindex grammar file
1347 @cindex format of grammar file
1348 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1350 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1351 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1358 @var{Bison declarations}
1367 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1368 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1370 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1371 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1372 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1373 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1374 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1375 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1377 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1378 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1379 semantic values of various symbols.
1381 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1384 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1385 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1386 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1390 @cindex simple examples
1391 @cindex examples, simple
1393 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1394 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1395 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1396 and a multi-function calculator. All
1397 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1399 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1400 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1401 source file to try them.
1404 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1405 a first example with no operator precedence.
1406 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1407 Operator precedence is introduced.
1408 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1409 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1410 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1411 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1412 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1416 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1417 @cindex reverse polish notation
1418 @cindex polish notation calculator
1419 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1420 @cindex calculator, simple
1422 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1423 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1424 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1425 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1427 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1428 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1431 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1432 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1433 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1434 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1435 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1436 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1437 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1440 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1441 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1443 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1444 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1447 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1450 #define YYSTYPE double
1453 void yyerror (char const *);
1458 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1461 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1462 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1464 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1465 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1466 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1467 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1468 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1469 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1470 which is a floating point number.
1472 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1473 function @code{pow}.
1475 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1476 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1477 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1478 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1481 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1482 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1483 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1484 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1485 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1486 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1487 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1488 type for numeric constants.
1491 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1493 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1504 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1509 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1510 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1511 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1512 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1513 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1514 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1515 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1521 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1522 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1523 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1524 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1525 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1528 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1529 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1530 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1532 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1533 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1534 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1535 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1536 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1537 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1546 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1548 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1556 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1557 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1558 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1559 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1560 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1562 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1563 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1564 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1565 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1566 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1567 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1569 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1570 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1571 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1572 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1575 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1576 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1577 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1580 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1582 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1586 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1590 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1591 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1592 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1593 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1594 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1595 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1596 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1598 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1599 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1600 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1601 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1602 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1605 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1607 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1608 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1609 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1610 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1614 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1615 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1620 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1621 equally well have written them separately:
1625 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1626 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1630 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1631 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1632 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1633 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1634 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1635 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1636 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1637 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1639 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1640 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1641 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1643 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1644 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1648 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1652 means the same thing as this:
1656 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1662 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1665 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1666 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1667 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1669 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1670 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1671 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1672 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1674 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1676 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1677 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1678 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1679 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1681 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1682 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1683 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1684 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1685 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1686 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1687 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1688 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1689 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1691 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1692 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1693 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1694 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1695 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1697 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1698 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1700 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1704 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1705 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1706 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1707 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1718 /* Skip white space. */
1719 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1723 /* Process numbers. */
1724 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1727 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1732 /* Return end-of-input. */
1735 /* Return a single char. */
1742 @subsection The Controlling Function
1743 @cindex controlling function
1744 @cindex main function in simple example
1746 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1747 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1748 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1761 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1762 @cindex error reporting routine
1764 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1765 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1766 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1767 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1768 here is the definition we will use:
1776 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1778 yyerror (char const *s)
1780 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1785 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1786 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1787 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1788 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1789 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1790 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1792 @node Rpcalc Generate
1793 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1794 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1796 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1797 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1798 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1799 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1800 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1801 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1803 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1804 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1806 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1807 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1814 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1815 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1816 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1817 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1818 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1819 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1820 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1822 @node Rpcalc Compile
1823 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1824 @cindex compiling the parser
1826 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1830 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1832 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1836 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1837 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1838 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1842 # @r{List files again.}
1844 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1848 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1849 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1855 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1857 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1861 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1863 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1868 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1869 @cindex infix notation calculator
1871 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1873 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1874 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1875 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1876 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1879 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1883 #define YYSTYPE double
1887 void yyerror (char const *);
1892 /* Bison declarations. */
1896 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1897 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1900 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1909 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1914 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1915 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1916 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1917 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1918 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1919 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1920 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1921 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1928 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1931 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1933 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1934 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1935 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1936 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1937 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1938 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1941 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1942 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1943 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1944 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1945 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1948 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1949 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1950 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1951 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1952 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1954 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1959 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1967 @node Simple Error Recovery
1968 @section Simple Error Recovery
1969 @cindex error recovery, simple
1971 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1972 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1973 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1974 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1975 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1976 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1978 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1979 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1980 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1985 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1986 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
1991 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
1992 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
1993 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
1994 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
1995 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
1996 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
1997 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
1998 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2001 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2002 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2003 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2004 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2005 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2006 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2009 @node Location Tracking Calc
2010 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2011 @cindex location tracking calculator
2012 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2013 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2015 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2016 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2017 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2018 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2022 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2023 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2024 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2027 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2028 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2030 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2031 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2034 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2040 void yyerror (char const *);
2043 /* Bison declarations. */
2051 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2055 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2056 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2057 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2058 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2059 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2060 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2061 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2065 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2067 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2068 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2069 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2070 from the new information.
2072 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2073 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2084 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2089 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2090 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2091 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2092 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2102 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2103 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2104 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2109 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2110 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2111 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2115 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2116 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2117 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2119 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2120 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2121 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2122 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2123 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2124 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2128 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2130 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2131 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2132 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2135 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2136 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2147 /* Skip white space. */
2148 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2149 ++yylloc.last_column;
2154 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2155 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2159 /* Process numbers. */
2163 ++yylloc.last_column;
2164 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2166 ++yylloc.last_column;
2167 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2174 /* Return end-of-input. */
2179 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2183 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2186 ++yylloc.last_column;
2192 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2193 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2194 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2195 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2197 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2198 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2199 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2200 controlling function:
2207 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2208 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2214 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2215 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2216 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2218 @node Multi-function Calc
2219 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2220 @cindex multi-function calculator
2221 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2222 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2224 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2225 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2226 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2227 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2228 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2230 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2231 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2232 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2233 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2234 functions whose syntax has this form:
2237 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2241 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2242 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2243 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2247 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2251 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2257 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2262 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2265 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2266 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2267 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2270 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2271 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2273 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2278 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2279 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2281 void yyerror (char const *);
2286 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2287 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2290 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2291 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2298 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2299 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2301 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2304 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2305 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2306 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2308 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2309 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2310 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2311 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2313 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2314 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2315 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2316 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2317 between angle brackets).
2319 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2320 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2321 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2322 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2323 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2324 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2327 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2329 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2330 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2331 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2343 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2344 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2349 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2350 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2351 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2352 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2353 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2354 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2355 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2356 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2357 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2358 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2359 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2362 /* End of grammar. */
2366 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2367 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2368 @cindex symbol table example
2370 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2371 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2372 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2373 requires some additional C functions for support.
2375 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2376 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2377 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2381 /* Function type. */
2382 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2386 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2389 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2390 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2393 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2394 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2396 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2401 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2403 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2404 extern symrec *sym_table;
2406 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2407 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2411 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2412 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2413 @code{init_table} as well:
2419 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2421 yyerror (char const *s)
2431 double (*fnct) (double);
2436 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2449 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2454 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2459 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2461 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2462 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2477 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2478 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2480 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2481 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2482 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2483 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2484 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2485 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2488 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2489 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2493 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2495 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2496 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2497 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2498 ptr->type = sym_type;
2499 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2500 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2508 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2511 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2512 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2513 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2520 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2521 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2522 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2523 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2525 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2526 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2527 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2528 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2529 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2530 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2532 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2533 operators in @code{yylex}.
2546 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2547 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2555 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2556 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2559 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2565 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2568 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2569 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2570 static size_t length = 40;
2571 static char *symbuf = 0;
2578 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2584 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2588 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2590 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2592 /* Get another character. */
2597 while (isalnum (c));
2604 s = getsym (symbuf);
2606 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2611 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2617 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2618 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2619 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2627 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2630 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2631 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2632 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2635 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2636 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2640 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2642 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2643 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2645 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2646 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2649 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2650 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2651 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2652 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2653 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2654 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2655 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2656 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2657 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2660 @node Grammar Outline
2661 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2663 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2664 appropriate delimiters:
2671 @var{Bison declarations}
2680 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2681 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2682 continues until end of line.
2685 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2686 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2687 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2688 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2689 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2693 @subsection The prologue
2694 @cindex declarations section
2696 @cindex declarations
2698 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2699 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2700 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2701 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2702 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2703 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2704 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2706 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2707 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2710 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2711 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2712 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2713 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2714 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2715 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2716 @code{%union} declaration.
2727 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2731 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2732 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2738 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2739 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2740 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2741 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2742 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2743 @code{#include} directives.
2745 @node Prologue Alternatives
2746 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2747 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2750 @findex %code requires
2751 @findex %code provides
2754 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2755 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2756 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2757 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2758 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2759 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2760 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2762 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2773 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2777 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2778 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2785 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2786 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2787 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2788 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2789 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2790 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2791 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2792 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2793 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2794 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2795 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2797 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2798 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2799 This behavior raises a few questions.
2800 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2801 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2802 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2803 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2804 This behavior is not intuitive.
2806 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2807 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2808 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2809 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2816 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2817 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2820 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2821 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2833 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2837 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2838 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2839 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2846 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2847 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2848 explicit which kind you intend.
2849 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2851 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2852 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2853 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2854 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2855 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2856 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2857 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2858 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2859 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2862 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2863 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2865 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2883 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2889 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2890 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2903 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2904 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2905 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2913 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2914 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2915 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2916 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2917 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2918 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2920 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2921 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2922 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2923 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2924 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2925 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2926 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2927 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2928 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2929 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2930 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2933 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2934 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2935 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2936 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2937 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2938 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2939 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
2940 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
2941 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
2942 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
2960 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2966 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2967 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2980 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2986 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2987 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2995 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
2996 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
2997 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3000 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3001 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3002 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3003 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3004 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3005 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3008 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3009 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3010 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3011 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3013 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3014 organize your grammar file.
3015 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3020 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3021 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3022 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3023 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
3027 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3028 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3029 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3030 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
3035 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3036 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3038 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3040 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3041 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3042 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3043 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3045 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3046 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3047 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3048 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3049 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3050 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3051 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3052 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3055 @node Bison Declarations
3056 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3057 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3058 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3060 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3061 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3062 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3063 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3066 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3067 @cindex grammar rules section
3068 @cindex rules section for grammar
3070 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3071 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3073 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3074 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3075 if it is the first thing in the file.
3078 @subsection The epilogue
3079 @cindex additional C code section
3081 @cindex C code, section for additional
3083 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3084 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3085 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3086 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3087 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3088 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3089 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3090 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3091 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3092 C-Language Interface}.
3094 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3095 from the grammar rules.
3097 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3098 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3099 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3100 of the grammar file.
3103 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3104 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3105 @cindex terminal symbol
3109 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3112 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3113 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3114 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3115 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3116 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3117 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3118 the symbol to stand for it.
3120 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3121 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3122 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3124 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3125 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3126 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3127 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3128 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3129 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3130 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3132 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3136 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3137 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3138 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3139 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3142 @cindex character token
3143 @cindex literal token
3144 @cindex single-character literal
3145 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3146 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3147 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3148 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3149 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3150 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3151 ,Operator Precedence}).
3153 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3154 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3155 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3156 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3157 your program will confuse other readers.
3159 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3160 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3161 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3162 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3163 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3164 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3168 @cindex string token
3169 @cindex literal string token
3170 @cindex multicharacter literal
3171 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3172 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3173 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3174 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3175 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3177 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3178 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3179 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3180 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3181 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3183 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3185 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3186 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3187 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3188 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3189 read your program will be confused.
3191 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3192 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3193 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3194 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3195 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3196 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3199 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3200 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3201 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3203 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3204 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3205 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3206 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3207 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3208 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3209 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3210 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3211 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3212 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3213 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3214 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3216 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3217 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3218 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3219 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3220 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3222 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3223 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3224 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3225 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3226 characters in the following C-language string:
3229 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3232 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3233 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3234 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3235 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3236 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3237 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3238 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3239 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3240 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3241 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3244 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3245 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3246 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3247 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3248 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3251 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3253 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3254 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3256 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3260 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3266 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3267 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3268 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3280 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3281 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3283 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3284 extra white space as you wish.
3286 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3287 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3290 @{@var{C statements}@}
3295 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3296 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3297 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3298 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3299 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3300 compiler can check it.
3302 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3303 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3304 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3305 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3306 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3307 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3308 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3309 character constants.
3311 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3315 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3316 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3320 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3321 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3328 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3330 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3331 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3332 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3349 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3353 @section Recursive Rules
3354 @cindex recursive rule
3356 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3357 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3358 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3359 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3360 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3370 @cindex left recursion
3371 @cindex right recursion
3373 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3374 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3375 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3386 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3387 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3388 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3389 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3390 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3391 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3392 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3395 @cindex mutual recursion
3396 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3397 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3398 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3406 | primary '+' primary
3418 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3422 @section Defining Language Semantics
3423 @cindex defining language semantics
3424 @cindex language semantics, defining
3426 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3427 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3428 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3430 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3431 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3432 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3433 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3436 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3437 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3438 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3439 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3440 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3441 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3442 action in the middle of a rule.
3446 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3447 @cindex semantic value type
3448 @cindex value type, semantic
3449 @cindex data types of semantic values
3450 @cindex default data type
3452 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3453 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3454 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3455 Notation Calculator}).
3457 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3458 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3459 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3462 #define YYSTYPE double
3466 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3467 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3468 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3469 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3471 @node Multiple Types
3472 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3474 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3475 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3476 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3477 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3480 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3481 requires you to do two things:
3485 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3486 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3487 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3488 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3492 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3493 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3494 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3495 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3496 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3505 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3507 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3508 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3509 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3510 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3512 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3513 placed at any position in the rule;
3514 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3515 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3516 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3517 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3519 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3520 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3521 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3522 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3523 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3524 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3525 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3526 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3527 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3528 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3531 Here is a typical example:
3541 Or, in terms of named references:
3545 exp[result]: @dots{}
3546 | exp[left] '+' exp[right]
3547 @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3552 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3553 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3554 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3555 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3556 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3557 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3559 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3560 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3561 referred to as @code{$2}.
3563 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3564 references construct.
3566 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3567 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3568 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3569 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3570 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3574 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3578 @cindex default action
3579 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3580 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3581 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3582 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3583 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3584 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3586 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3587 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3588 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3589 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3590 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3594 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3595 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3601 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3606 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3607 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3608 definition of @code{foo}.
3611 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3612 any, from a semantic action.
3613 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3614 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3617 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3618 @cindex action data types
3619 @cindex data types in actions
3621 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3622 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3624 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3625 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3626 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3627 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3628 in the rule. In this example,
3639 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3640 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3641 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3642 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3644 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3645 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3646 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3658 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3659 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3661 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3662 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3663 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3664 @cindex mid-rule actions
3666 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3667 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3668 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3670 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3671 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3672 it is run before they are parsed.
3674 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3675 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3676 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3677 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3680 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3681 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3682 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3683 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3684 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3685 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3687 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3688 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3689 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3690 at the end of the rule.
3692 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3693 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3694 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3695 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3696 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3697 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3701 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3702 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3703 declare_variable ($3); @}
3705 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3710 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3711 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3712 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3713 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3714 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3715 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3716 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3717 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3719 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3720 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3721 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3722 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3723 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3726 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3727 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3728 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3729 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3730 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3732 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3733 Discarded Symbols}).
3734 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3735 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3737 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3738 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3743 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3749 pop_context ($1); @}
3752 let: LET '(' var ')'
3753 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3754 declare_variable ($3); @}
3761 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3762 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3763 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3765 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3766 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3767 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3768 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3769 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3774 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3775 | '@{' statements '@}'
3781 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3785 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3786 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3789 | '@{' statements '@}'
3795 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3796 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3797 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3798 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3799 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3800 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3802 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3803 actions into the two rules, like this:
3807 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3808 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3809 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3810 '@{' statements '@}'
3816 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3817 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3819 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3820 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3821 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3825 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3826 declarations statements '@}'
3827 | '@{' statements '@}'
3833 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3834 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3836 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3837 serves as a subroutine:
3841 subroutine: /* empty */
3842 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3848 compound: subroutine
3849 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3851 '@{' statements '@}'
3857 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3858 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3860 @node Tracking Locations
3861 @section Tracking Locations
3863 @cindex textual location
3864 @cindex location, textual
3866 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3867 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3868 especially symbol locations.
3870 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3871 actions to take when rules are matched.
3874 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3875 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3876 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3880 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3881 @cindex data type of locations
3882 @cindex default location type
3884 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3885 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3887 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3888 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3889 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3890 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3894 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3903 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3904 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3905 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3906 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3907 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3909 @node Actions and Locations
3910 @subsection Actions and Locations
3911 @cindex location actions
3912 @cindex actions, location
3915 @vindex @@@var{name}
3916 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3918 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3919 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3921 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3922 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3923 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3924 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3925 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3928 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
3929 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
3930 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3931 references construct.
3933 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3940 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3941 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3942 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3943 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3950 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3951 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3952 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3958 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3959 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3960 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
3963 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
3964 example above simply rewrites this way:
3977 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3978 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3979 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3986 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
3987 from a semantic action.
3988 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
3989 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3991 @node Location Default Action
3992 @subsection Default Action for Locations
3993 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
3994 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
3996 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
3997 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
3998 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
3999 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4000 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4001 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4002 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4003 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4006 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4007 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4009 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4010 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4011 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4012 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4013 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4014 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4015 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4016 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4017 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4018 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4020 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4024 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
4028 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4029 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4030 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4031 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4035 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
4036 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4037 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
4038 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4045 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4046 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4047 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4049 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4053 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4054 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4057 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4058 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4059 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4060 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4063 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4064 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4065 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4066 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4069 @node Named References
4070 @section Named References
4071 @cindex named references
4073 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4074 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4075 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4076 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4077 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4078 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4080 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4081 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4082 used as named references. For example:
4086 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4087 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4092 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4096 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4097 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4102 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4108 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4111 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4114 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4119 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4120 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4121 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4124 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4125 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4130 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4131 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4132 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4135 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4136 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4142 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4143 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4146 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4147 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4151 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4152 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4153 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4154 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4155 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4156 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4157 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4159 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4163 @section Bison Declarations
4164 @cindex declarations, Bison
4165 @cindex Bison declarations
4167 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4168 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4171 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4172 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4173 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4174 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4176 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4177 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4178 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4179 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4182 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4183 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4184 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4185 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4186 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4187 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4188 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4189 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4190 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4191 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4192 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4193 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4194 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4195 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4199 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4200 @cindex version requirement
4201 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4204 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4205 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4209 %require "@var{version}"
4213 @subsection Token Type Names
4214 @cindex declaring token type names
4215 @cindex token type names, declaring
4216 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4219 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4225 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4226 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4227 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4229 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4230 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4231 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4234 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4235 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4236 following the token name:
4240 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4244 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4245 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4246 with each other or with normal characters.
4248 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4249 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4250 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4251 Than One Value Type}).
4257 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4261 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4265 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4266 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4267 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4274 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4275 equivalent literal string tokens:
4278 %token <operator> OR "||"
4279 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4284 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4285 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4286 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4287 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4288 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4289 the literal string instead of the token name.
4291 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4292 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4296 %token END 0 "end of file"
4299 @node Precedence Decl
4300 @subsection Operator Precedence
4301 @cindex precedence declarations
4302 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4303 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4305 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4306 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4307 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4308 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4309 operator precedence.
4311 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4312 @code{%token}: either
4315 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4322 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4325 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4326 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4327 all the @var{symbols}:
4331 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4332 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4333 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4334 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4335 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4336 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4337 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4338 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4339 considered a syntax error.
4342 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4343 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4344 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4345 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4346 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4349 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4350 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4351 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4352 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4357 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4358 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4362 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4363 @cindex declaring value types
4364 @cindex value types, declaring
4367 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4368 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4369 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4384 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4385 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4386 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4387 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4389 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4390 @code{union}. For example:
4402 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4403 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4406 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4407 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4408 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4410 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4411 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4413 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4414 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4415 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4416 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4424 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4429 and then your grammar can use the following
4430 instead of @code{%union}:
4443 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4444 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4445 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4449 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4450 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4451 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4454 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4458 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4459 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4460 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4461 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4462 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4465 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4466 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4467 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4468 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4470 @node Initial Action Decl
4471 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4472 @findex %initial-action
4474 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4475 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4478 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4479 @findex %initial-action
4480 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4481 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4482 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4483 @code{%parse-param}.
4486 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4489 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4492 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4497 @node Destructor Decl
4498 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4499 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4503 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4504 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4505 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4506 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4507 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4508 must discard the start symbol.
4510 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4511 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4512 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4513 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4515 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4516 symbol is automatically discarded.
4518 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4520 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4522 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4523 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4524 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4525 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4527 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4528 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4529 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4530 tag among @var{symbols}.
4531 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4532 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4533 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4535 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4536 (These default forms are experimental.
4537 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4539 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4540 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4541 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4542 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4544 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4545 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4546 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4547 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4548 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4555 %union @{ char *string; @}
4556 %token <string> STRING1
4557 %token <string> STRING2
4558 %type <string> string1
4559 %type <string> string2
4560 %union @{ char character; @}
4561 %token <character> CHR
4562 %type <character> chr
4565 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4566 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4567 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4568 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4572 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4573 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4574 to @code{free} by default.
4575 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4576 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4577 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4578 @code{free} only once.
4579 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4580 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4582 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4583 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4584 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4585 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4586 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4587 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4588 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4589 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4590 reference it in your grammar.
4591 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4592 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4598 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4599 @cindex mid-rule actions
4600 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4601 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4602 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4603 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4604 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4605 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4606 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4607 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4611 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4612 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4613 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4618 @cindex discarded symbols
4619 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4623 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4625 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4627 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4628 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4630 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4633 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4634 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4637 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4638 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4639 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4643 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4644 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4645 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4646 @cindex warnings, preventing
4647 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4651 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4652 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4653 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4654 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4655 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4656 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4658 The declaration looks like this:
4664 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4665 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4666 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4667 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4669 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4670 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4671 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4672 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4673 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4674 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4675 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4681 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4685 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4686 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4687 print the number of conflicts.
4690 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4691 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4692 go back to the beginning.
4695 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4696 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4697 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4700 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4701 but will keep silent otherwise.
4704 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4705 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4706 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4707 @cindex default start symbol
4710 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4711 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4712 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4719 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4720 @cindex reentrant parser
4722 @findex %define api.pure
4724 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4725 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4726 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4727 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4728 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4729 program must be called only within interlocks.
4731 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4732 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4733 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4734 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4735 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4737 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4738 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4739 reentrant. It looks like this:
4745 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4746 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4747 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4748 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4749 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4750 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4751 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4752 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4753 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4755 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4756 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4760 @subsection A Push Parser
4763 @findex %define api.push-pull
4765 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4766 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4768 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4769 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4770 each time a new token is made available.
4772 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4773 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4774 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4775 within a certain time period.
4777 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4778 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4779 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4782 %define api.push-pull push
4785 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4786 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4787 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4788 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4789 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4793 %define api.push-pull push
4796 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4797 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4798 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4799 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4801 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4802 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4803 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4804 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4805 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4806 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4807 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4808 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4812 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4814 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4815 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4816 yypstate_delete (ps);
4819 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4820 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4821 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4822 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4823 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4824 example would thus look like this:
4829 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4832 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4833 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4834 yypstate_delete (ps);
4837 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4838 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4840 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4841 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4842 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4843 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4844 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4845 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4846 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4847 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4848 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4849 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4850 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4851 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4852 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4853 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4854 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4855 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4856 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4860 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4861 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4862 yypstate_delete (ps);
4865 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4866 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
4867 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
4870 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4871 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4872 @cindex declaration summary
4873 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4875 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4877 @deffn {Directive} %union
4878 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4879 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4882 @deffn {Directive} %token
4883 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4884 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4887 @deffn {Directive} %right
4888 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4889 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4892 @deffn {Directive} %left
4893 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4894 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4897 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4898 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4899 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4900 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4904 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4905 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4906 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4910 @deffn {Directive} %type
4911 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4912 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4915 @deffn {Directive} %start
4916 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4920 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4921 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4922 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4928 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4931 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4932 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4934 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
4935 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
4936 @xref{%code Summary}.
4939 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4940 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
4941 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
4942 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4945 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
4946 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
4947 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
4948 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
4951 @deffn {Directive} %defines
4952 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
4953 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
4954 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
4955 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
4957 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
4958 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
4959 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
4960 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
4961 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
4962 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
4963 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
4964 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
4965 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
4966 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
4968 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
4969 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
4970 (Reentrant) Parser}.
4972 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
4973 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
4974 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
4976 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
4977 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
4978 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
4979 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
4980 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
4982 @findex %code requires
4983 @findex %code provides
4984 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
4985 header also contains their code.
4986 @xref{%code Summary}.
4989 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
4990 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
4993 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
4994 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
4995 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
4998 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
4999 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5000 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5003 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5004 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5005 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5006 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5008 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5012 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5013 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5014 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5015 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5016 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5017 accurate syntax error messages.
5020 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5021 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5022 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5024 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5025 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5026 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5027 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5028 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5029 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5030 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5031 For C++ parsers, see the @code{%define namespace} documentation in this
5033 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5037 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5038 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5039 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5044 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5045 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5046 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5047 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5048 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5049 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5050 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5054 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5055 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5058 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5059 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5060 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5064 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5065 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5066 Require a Version of Bison}.
5069 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5070 Specify the skeleton to use.
5072 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5073 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5074 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5075 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5077 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5078 file in the Bison installation directory.
5079 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5080 directory of the grammar file.
5081 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5084 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5085 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5086 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5087 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5088 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5089 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5090 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5093 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5094 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5095 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5096 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5097 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5098 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5099 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5102 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5103 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5104 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5108 The highest token number, plus one.
5110 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5112 The number of grammar rules,
5114 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5118 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5119 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5120 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5121 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5125 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5126 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5127 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5131 @node %define Summary
5132 @subsection %define Summary
5134 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5135 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5136 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5137 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5138 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5139 @code{%define} directive:
5141 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5142 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5143 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5144 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5146 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5147 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5148 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5149 to specifying @code{""}.
5151 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5152 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5153 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5156 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5157 @code{%define} accepts.
5159 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5160 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5164 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5166 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5167 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5169 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5171 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5172 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5175 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5176 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5177 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5178 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5179 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5180 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5184 @findex %define api.pure
5187 @item Language(s): C
5189 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5190 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5192 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5194 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5198 @findex %define api.push-pull
5201 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5203 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5204 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5205 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5206 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5208 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5210 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5213 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5215 @item lr.default-reductions
5216 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5219 @item Language(s): all
5221 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5222 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5223 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5224 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5226 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5227 @item Default Value:
5229 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5230 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5234 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5236 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5237 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5240 @item Language(s): all
5241 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5242 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5243 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5244 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5247 @c ================================================== lr.type
5250 @findex %define lr.type
5253 @item Language(s): all
5255 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5256 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5257 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5259 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5261 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5265 @findex %define namespace
5268 @item Languages(s): C++
5270 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5271 For example, if you specify:
5274 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5277 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5280 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5283 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5284 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5287 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5293 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5294 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5295 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5297 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5299 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5300 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5301 lexical analyzer function.
5302 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5303 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5304 lexical analyzer function.
5305 For example, if you specify:
5308 %define namespace "foo"
5309 %name-prefix "bar::"
5312 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5316 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5318 @findex %define parse.lac
5321 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5323 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5324 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5325 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5326 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5332 @subsection %code Summary
5336 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5337 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5338 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5339 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5340 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5341 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5342 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5343 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5345 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5346 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5347 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5348 in the parser implementation.
5350 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5351 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5352 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5354 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5357 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5358 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5359 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5360 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5361 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5362 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5366 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5367 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5368 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5371 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5372 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5376 @findex %code requires
5379 @item Language(s): C, C++
5381 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5382 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5383 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5384 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5385 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5387 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5388 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5393 @findex %code provides
5396 @item Language(s): C, C++
5398 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5399 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5401 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5402 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5410 @item Language(s): C, C++
5412 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5413 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5414 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5415 parser implementation file. For example:
5424 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5428 @findex %code imports
5431 @item Language(s): Java
5433 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5435 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5436 before any class definitions.
5440 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5441 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5442 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5443 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5446 @node Multiple Parsers
5447 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5449 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5450 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5451 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5452 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5454 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5455 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5456 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5457 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5458 names that do not conflict.
5460 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5461 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5462 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5463 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5464 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5465 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5466 @code{clex}, and so on.
5468 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5469 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5470 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5471 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5472 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5474 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5475 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5476 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5477 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5480 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5481 @cindex C-language interface
5484 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5485 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5486 functions that it needs to use.
5488 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5489 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5490 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5491 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5494 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5495 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5496 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5497 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5498 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5499 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5501 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5502 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5503 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5507 @node Parser Function
5508 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5511 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5512 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5513 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5514 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5515 without reading further.
5518 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5519 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5520 is due to end-of-input).
5522 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5523 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5526 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5529 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5534 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5539 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5542 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5543 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5544 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5546 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5547 @findex %parse-param
5548 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5549 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5550 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5551 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5552 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5555 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5558 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5559 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5563 Then call the parser like this:
5567 int nastiness, randomness;
5568 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5569 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5575 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5578 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5581 @node Push Parser Function
5582 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5583 @findex yypush_parse
5585 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5586 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5588 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5589 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5590 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5591 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5593 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5594 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5595 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5596 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5599 @node Pull Parser Function
5600 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5601 @findex yypull_parse
5603 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5604 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5606 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5607 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5608 declaration is used.
5609 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5611 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5612 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5615 @node Parser Create Function
5616 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5617 @findex yypstate_new
5619 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5620 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5622 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5623 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5624 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5625 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5627 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5628 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5629 or 0 if no memory was available.
5630 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5634 @node Parser Delete Function
5635 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5636 @findex yypstate_delete
5638 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5639 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5641 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5642 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5643 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5644 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5646 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5647 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5648 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5652 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5654 @cindex lexical analyzer
5656 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5657 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5658 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5659 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5661 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5662 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5663 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5664 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5665 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5666 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5667 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5671 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5672 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5673 of the token it has read.
5674 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5675 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5677 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5678 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5681 @node Calling Convention
5682 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5684 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5685 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5686 signifies end-of-input.
5688 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5689 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5690 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5691 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5693 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5694 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5695 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5696 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5697 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5698 signifies end-of-input.
5700 Here is an example showing these things:
5707 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5710 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5711 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5713 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5719 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5720 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5722 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5723 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5727 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5728 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5729 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5730 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5733 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5734 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5735 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5736 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5737 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5740 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5741 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5742 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5743 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5746 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5749 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5750 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5751 strlen (token_buffer))
5752 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5753 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5758 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5759 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5763 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5766 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5767 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5768 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5769 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5775 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5776 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5781 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5782 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5783 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5784 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5785 declaration looks like this:
5798 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5803 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5804 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5809 @node Token Locations
5810 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5813 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
5814 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
5815 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
5816 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
5817 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
5818 data in that variable.
5820 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5821 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5822 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5823 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5824 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5827 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5830 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5832 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
5833 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5834 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5835 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5836 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5837 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
5842 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
5845 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5846 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5851 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
5852 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
5853 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
5857 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
5858 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
5861 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5863 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
5864 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
5870 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5871 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5872 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5876 results in the following signature:
5879 int yylex (int *nastiness);
5880 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5883 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
5886 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
5887 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5891 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
5894 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5895 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5898 @node Error Reporting
5899 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
5900 @cindex error reporting function
5903 @cindex syntax error
5905 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
5906 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
5907 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
5908 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
5911 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
5912 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
5913 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
5914 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
5915 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
5917 @findex %error-verbose
5918 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
5919 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
5920 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
5921 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
5922 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
5924 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
5925 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
5926 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
5927 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
5928 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
5929 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
5931 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
5932 translated automatically from English to some other language before
5933 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
5935 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
5940 yyerror (char const *s)
5944 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
5949 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
5950 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
5951 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
5952 immediately return 1.
5954 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
5955 an access to the current location.
5956 This is indeed the case for the GLR
5957 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
5958 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5962 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5963 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5966 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
5969 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5970 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5973 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
5974 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
5975 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
5976 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
5980 /* Location tracking. */
5984 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5986 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5987 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5991 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
5994 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5995 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5996 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
5997 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6002 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6003 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6004 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6005 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6006 message is always passed last.
6008 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6009 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6010 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6014 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6015 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6016 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6017 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6019 @node Action Features
6020 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6021 @cindex summary, action features
6022 @cindex action features summary
6024 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6025 are useful in actions.
6027 @deffn {Variable} $$
6028 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6029 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6032 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6033 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6034 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6037 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6038 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6039 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6040 Types of Values in Actions}.
6043 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6044 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6045 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6046 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6049 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
6050 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6051 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6054 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
6055 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6056 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6059 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
6061 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6062 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6063 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6064 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6065 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6066 going to be reduced by this rule.
6068 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6069 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6070 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6073 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6076 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6078 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6081 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6083 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6087 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
6089 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6090 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6091 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6092 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6093 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6096 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6097 @findex YYRECOVERING
6098 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6099 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6100 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6103 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6104 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6105 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6106 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6107 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6109 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6112 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
6113 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6115 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6117 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6120 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
6121 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6122 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6123 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6126 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6127 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6128 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6129 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6131 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6134 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6135 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6136 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6137 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6139 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6144 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6145 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6148 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6152 @c int first_line, last_line;
6153 @c int first_column, last_column;
6157 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6158 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6160 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6161 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6162 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6165 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6168 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6170 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6171 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6175 @node Internationalization
6176 @section Parser Internationalization
6177 @cindex internationalization
6183 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6184 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6185 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6186 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6187 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6188 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6189 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6190 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6193 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6194 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6195 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6200 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6201 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6202 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6203 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6204 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6208 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6213 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6214 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6215 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6216 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6217 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6218 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6219 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6220 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6221 Bison-generated parser.
6224 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6225 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6226 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6230 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6233 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6234 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6235 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6239 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6240 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6241 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6244 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6250 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6254 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6260 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6261 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6262 @cindex algorithm of parser
6265 @cindex parser stack
6266 @cindex stack, parser
6268 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6269 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6270 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6272 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6273 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6276 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6277 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6278 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6279 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6280 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6281 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6282 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6284 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6291 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6292 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6295 expr: expr '*' expr;
6299 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6306 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6307 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6309 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6310 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6311 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6313 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6316 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6317 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6318 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6319 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6320 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6321 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6322 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6323 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6324 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6325 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6329 @section Lookahead Tokens
6330 @cindex lookahead token
6332 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6333 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6334 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6335 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6336 token in order to decide what to do.
6338 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6339 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6340 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6341 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6342 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6343 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6344 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6347 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6348 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6349 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6366 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6367 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6368 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6369 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6370 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6372 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6373 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6374 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6375 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6376 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6377 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6382 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6383 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6384 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6385 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6388 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6390 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6391 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6392 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6394 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6395 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6401 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6407 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6408 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6410 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6411 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6412 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6413 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6416 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6417 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6418 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6419 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6420 contrast it with the other alternative.
6422 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6423 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6427 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6429 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6432 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6433 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6434 making these two inputs equivalent:
6437 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6439 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6442 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6443 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6444 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6445 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6446 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6447 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6448 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6449 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6451 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6452 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6453 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6454 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6456 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6458 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6459 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6460 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6465 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6477 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6486 @section Operator Precedence
6487 @cindex operator precedence
6488 @cindex precedence of operators
6490 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6491 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6492 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6493 shift and when to reduce.
6496 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6497 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6498 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6499 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6502 @node Why Precedence
6503 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6505 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6506 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6520 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6521 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6522 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6523 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6524 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6525 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6526 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6529 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6530 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6531 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6532 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6533 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6534 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6535 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6536 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6539 @cindex associativity
6540 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6541 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6542 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6543 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6544 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6545 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6546 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6547 makes right-associativity.
6549 @node Using Precedence
6550 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6555 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6556 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6557 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6558 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6559 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6560 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6561 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6564 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6565 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6566 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6567 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6568 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6570 @node Precedence Examples
6571 @subsection Precedence Examples
6573 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6581 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6582 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6583 declared with @code{'-'}:
6586 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6592 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6593 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6594 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6596 @node How Precedence
6597 @subsection How Precedence Works
6599 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6600 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6601 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6602 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6603 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6604 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6606 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6607 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6608 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6609 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6610 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6611 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6612 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6615 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6616 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6618 @node Contextual Precedence
6619 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6620 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6621 @cindex unary operator precedence
6622 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6623 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6626 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6627 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6628 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6629 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6631 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6632 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6633 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6634 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6637 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6638 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6639 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6640 modifier's syntax is:
6643 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6647 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6648 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6649 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6650 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6651 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6653 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6654 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6655 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6665 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6672 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6677 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6678 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6679 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6680 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6682 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6683 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6684 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6685 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6687 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6688 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6689 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6690 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6691 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6692 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6694 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6695 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6699 @section Parser States
6700 @cindex finite-state machine
6701 @cindex parser state
6702 @cindex state (of parser)
6704 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6705 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6706 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6707 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6708 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6710 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6711 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6712 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6713 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6714 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6715 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6716 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6717 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6720 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6721 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6722 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6725 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6726 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6727 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6729 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6730 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6733 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6734 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6738 sequence: /* empty */
6739 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6742 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6747 maybeword: /* empty */
6748 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6750 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6756 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6757 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6758 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6759 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6760 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6761 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6763 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6764 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6765 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6767 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6768 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6769 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6770 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6771 In this example, the output of the program changes.
6773 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6774 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6775 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6776 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6779 sequence: /* empty */
6780 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6782 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6786 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6789 sequence: /* empty */
6791 | sequence redirects
6798 redirects:/* empty */
6799 | redirects redirect
6804 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6805 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6806 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6807 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6808 in infinitely many ways!
6810 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6811 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6812 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6813 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6815 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6819 sequence: /* empty */
6825 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6830 sequence: /* empty */
6832 | sequence redirects
6844 | redirects redirect
6849 @node Mysterious Conflicts
6850 @section Mysterious Conflicts
6851 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
6853 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
6861 def: param_spec return_spec ','
6865 | name_list ':' type
6883 | name ',' name_list
6888 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
6889 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
6890 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
6891 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
6895 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
6897 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
6898 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
6899 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
6901 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
6902 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
6903 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
6904 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
6905 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
6906 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
6907 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
6910 @cindex canonical LR
6911 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
6912 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
6913 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
6914 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
6915 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
6916 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
6917 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
6918 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
6920 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
6921 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
6922 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
6923 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
6924 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
6935 /* This rule is never used. */
6941 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
6942 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
6943 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
6944 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
6945 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
6946 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
6948 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
6949 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
6950 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
6951 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
6952 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
6953 rather than the one for @code{name}.
6958 | name_list ':' type
6966 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
6967 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
6972 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
6973 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
6974 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
6975 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
6976 Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
6977 the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
6978 sometimes contain incorrect information.
6980 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
6981 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
6982 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
6983 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
6985 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
6986 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
6989 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
6990 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
6991 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
6992 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
6995 @node LR Table Construction
6996 @subsection LR Table Construction
6997 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7000 @cindex canonical LR
7001 @findex %define lr.type
7003 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7004 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7005 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7006 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7009 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7010 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7011 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7012 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7015 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7016 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7017 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7020 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7021 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7022 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7025 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7027 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7030 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7034 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7038 %define lr.type ielr
7041 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7042 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7043 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7044 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7045 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7046 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7047 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7048 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7049 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7050 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7052 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7053 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7054 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7055 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7061 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7064 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7066 @cindex GLR with LALR
7067 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7068 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7069 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7070 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7071 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7072 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7073 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7074 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7075 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7076 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7078 @item Malformed grammars.
7080 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7081 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7082 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7083 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7084 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7089 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7090 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7091 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7092 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7093 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7094 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7095 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7096 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7097 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7101 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7104 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7105 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7106 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7107 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7108 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7109 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7110 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7111 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7112 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7113 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7114 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7115 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7118 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7119 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7120 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7122 @node Default Reductions
7123 @subsection Default Reductions
7124 @cindex default reductions
7125 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7128 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7129 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7130 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7131 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7132 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7134 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7135 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7138 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7140 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7141 @cindex consistent states
7142 @cindex defaulted states
7143 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7144 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7145 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7146 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7147 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7148 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7149 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7150 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7151 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7152 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7153 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7155 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7156 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7157 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7158 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7159 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7160 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7161 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7162 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7163 should already be considered closed.
7165 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7167 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7168 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7169 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7170 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7171 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7172 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7173 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7174 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7175 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7179 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7180 @c sentence from being rejected.
7181 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7182 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7183 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7184 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7185 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7186 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7189 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7190 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7191 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7192 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7193 because the accept action ends the parse.
7195 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7196 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7197 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7198 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7199 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7200 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7201 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7202 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7203 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7204 split the parse instead.
7206 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7207 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7209 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7210 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7211 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7213 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7214 @item @code{consistent}
7215 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7218 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7219 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7224 @findex %define parse.lac
7226 @cindex lookahead correction
7228 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7229 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7230 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7231 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7232 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7233 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7234 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7235 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7236 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7238 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7239 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7240 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7241 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7242 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7244 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7245 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7246 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7247 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7249 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7250 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7252 @item @code{none} (default)
7255 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7256 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7260 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7261 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7262 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7263 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7264 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7265 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7266 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7267 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7268 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7269 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7272 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7273 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7274 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7275 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7276 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7277 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7278 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7279 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7280 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7281 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7283 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7284 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7285 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7286 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7287 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7288 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7289 language-recognition power.
7291 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7294 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7296 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7297 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7298 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7299 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7302 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7304 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7305 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7306 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7307 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7308 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7309 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7313 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7314 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7315 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7316 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7317 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7318 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7319 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7320 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7321 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7322 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7323 has proven insignificant for practical grammars.
7326 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7327 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7328 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7330 @node Unreachable States
7331 @subsection Unreachable States
7332 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7333 @cindex unreachable states
7335 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7336 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7337 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7338 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7340 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7341 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7342 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7343 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7345 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7346 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7347 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7350 There are a few caveats to consider:
7353 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7355 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7356 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7357 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7358 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7359 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7360 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7362 @item Other useless states.
7364 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7365 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7366 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7367 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7368 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7369 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7370 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7373 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7374 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7376 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7377 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7378 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7380 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7381 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7382 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7383 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7384 context-free languages.
7385 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7386 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7387 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7388 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7389 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7390 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7391 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7392 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7394 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7395 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7396 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7397 parser uses the same basic
7398 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7399 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7400 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7401 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7403 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7404 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7405 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7406 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7407 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7409 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7410 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7411 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7412 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7413 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7414 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7415 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7416 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7417 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7418 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7419 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7422 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7423 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7424 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7425 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7426 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7427 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7428 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7429 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7430 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7431 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7432 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7433 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7435 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7436 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7437 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7439 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7440 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7441 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7442 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7443 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7444 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7445 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7446 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7447 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7448 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7449 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7450 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7452 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7455 @node Memory Management
7456 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7457 @cindex memory exhaustion
7458 @cindex memory management
7459 @cindex stack overflow
7460 @cindex parser stack overflow
7461 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7463 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7464 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7465 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7467 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7468 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7469 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7472 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7473 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7474 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7475 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7477 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7478 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7479 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7480 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7481 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7482 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7484 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7485 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7486 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7489 @cindex default stack limit
7490 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7494 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7495 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7496 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7497 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7498 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7500 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7502 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7503 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7504 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7505 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7506 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7507 this deficiency in a future release.
7509 @node Error Recovery
7510 @chapter Error Recovery
7511 @cindex error recovery
7512 @cindex recovery from errors
7514 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7515 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7516 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7519 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7520 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7521 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7522 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7523 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7524 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7525 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7528 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7529 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7530 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7531 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7532 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7533 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7538 stmnts: /* empty string */
7544 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7545 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
7547 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7548 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7549 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7550 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7551 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
7552 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7553 applicable in the ordinary way.
7555 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7556 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7557 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7558 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7559 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
7560 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7561 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7562 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7563 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7564 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7565 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7566 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7568 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7569 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7570 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7573 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7576 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7577 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7578 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7579 spurious error message:
7582 primary: '(' expr ')'
7588 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7589 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7590 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7591 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7592 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7593 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7594 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7597 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7598 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7599 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7600 error messages resume.
7602 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7603 as any other rules can.
7606 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7607 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7608 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7609 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7612 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7613 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7614 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7616 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7618 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7619 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7620 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7621 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7622 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7624 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7625 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7626 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7627 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7630 @node Context Dependency
7631 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7633 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7634 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7635 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7636 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7640 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7641 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7642 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7643 error recovery rules must be written.
7646 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7647 neither clean nor robust.)
7649 @node Semantic Tokens
7650 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7652 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7653 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7659 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7660 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7661 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7663 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7664 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7665 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7666 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7667 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7669 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7670 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7671 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7672 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7673 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7674 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7675 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7677 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7678 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7679 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7680 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7684 typedef int foo, bar;
7688 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7689 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7695 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7696 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7698 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7699 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7700 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7701 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7702 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7707 declarator maybeasm '='
7709 | declarator maybeasm
7715 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
7717 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7723 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7724 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7725 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7727 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7728 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7729 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7730 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7731 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7732 the syntactic context.
7734 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7735 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7736 @cindex lexical tie-in
7738 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7739 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7742 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7743 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7744 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7745 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7746 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7753 void yyerror (char const *);
7767 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7781 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7782 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7783 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7785 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
7786 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
7787 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
7790 @node Tie-in Recovery
7791 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7793 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7794 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7796 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7797 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7798 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7799 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7803 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7810 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7811 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7812 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7813 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7814 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7816 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7818 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7819 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7820 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7832 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7833 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7834 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7835 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7837 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7838 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7839 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7840 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7841 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7842 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7845 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7848 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7850 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
7851 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
7852 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
7853 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
7854 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
7855 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
7858 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7859 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7863 @section Understanding Your Parser
7865 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
7866 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
7867 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
7868 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
7869 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
7871 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
7872 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
7873 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
7874 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
7875 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
7876 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
7877 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
7879 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
7896 @command{bison} reports:
7899 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
7900 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
7901 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
7902 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
7903 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
7906 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
7907 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
7908 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
7909 interpretation is the same.
7911 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
7912 to precedence and/or associativity:
7915 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
7916 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
7917 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
7922 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
7925 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7926 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7927 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7928 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
7932 @cindex token, useless
7933 @cindex useless token
7934 @cindex nonterminal, useless
7935 @cindex useless nonterminal
7936 @cindex rule, useless
7937 @cindex useless rule
7938 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
7939 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
7940 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
7941 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
7945 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
7948 Terminals unused in grammar:
7951 Rules useless in grammar:
7956 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
7962 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
7963 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
7964 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
7965 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
7966 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
7971 and reports the uses of the symbols:
7975 Terminals, with rules where they appear
7987 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
7992 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
7998 @cindex pointed rule
7999 @cindex rule, pointed
8000 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8001 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8002 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8003 the location of the input cursor.
8008 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8010 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8015 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8016 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8017 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8018 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8019 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8020 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8021 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8022 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8024 @cindex core, item set
8025 @cindex item set core
8026 @cindex kernel, item set
8027 @cindex item set core
8028 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8029 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8030 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8031 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8032 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8033 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8038 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8039 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
8040 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
8041 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
8042 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
8043 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
8045 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8056 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
8058 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8062 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8063 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8064 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8065 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8070 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
8071 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8072 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8073 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8074 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8076 $ shift, and go to state 3
8077 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8078 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8079 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8080 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8084 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8085 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8086 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8087 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp '+' . exp}.
8088 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8091 @cindex accepting state
8092 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8098 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
8104 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
8105 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
8107 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8113 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
8115 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8121 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
8123 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8129 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
8131 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8137 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
8139 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8144 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8150 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8151 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
8152 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8153 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8154 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8156 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8157 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8159 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8160 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8163 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8164 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8165 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8166 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8167 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8168 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8169 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8170 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8172 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8173 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8174 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
8177 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8178 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8179 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8180 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8181 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8182 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8183 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8184 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8185 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8186 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8187 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8188 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8193 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8194 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
8195 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8196 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8197 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8199 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8200 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8202 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8203 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8206 The remaining states are similar:
8212 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8213 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8214 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
8215 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8216 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8218 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8219 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8221 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8222 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8228 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8229 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8230 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8231 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
8232 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8234 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8236 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8237 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8243 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8244 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8245 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8246 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8247 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
8249 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8250 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8251 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8252 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8254 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8255 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8256 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8257 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8258 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8263 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8264 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8265 @samp{*}, but also because the
8266 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8270 @section Tracing Your Parser
8273 @cindex tracing the parser
8275 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
8276 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
8278 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8281 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8283 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8284 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8285 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8286 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8289 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8290 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8291 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8293 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8295 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
8296 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
8297 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
8298 preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to
8300 the preferred solution.
8303 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8306 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8307 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8308 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8309 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8310 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8311 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8313 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8314 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8315 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8316 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8318 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8319 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8320 messages tell you these things:
8324 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8327 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8328 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8331 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8332 of the state stack afterward.
8335 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8336 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8337 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8338 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8339 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8340 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8341 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8342 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8343 grammar are to blame.
8345 The parser implementation file is a C program and you can use C
8346 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8347 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8348 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8349 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8352 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8353 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8354 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8355 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8356 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8357 value (from @code{yylval}).
8359 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8360 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8364 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8365 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
8368 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8371 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8374 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8375 else if (type == NUM)
8376 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8380 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8383 @chapter Invoking Bison
8384 @cindex invoking Bison
8385 @cindex Bison invocation
8386 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8388 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8394 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8395 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8396 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8397 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8398 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8399 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8400 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8401 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8402 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8403 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8404 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8409 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8412 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8415 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8418 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8420 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8421 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8422 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8425 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8426 in alphabetical order by short options.
8427 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8428 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8432 @section Bison Options
8434 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8435 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8436 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8437 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8438 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8441 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8442 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8445 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8451 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8455 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8457 @item --print-localedir
8458 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8460 @item --print-datadir
8461 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8465 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8466 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8467 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8468 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8469 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8470 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8471 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8472 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8473 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8474 for compatibility with POSIX:
8481 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8482 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8483 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8484 this option is specified.
8486 @item -W [@var{category}]
8487 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8488 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8491 @item midrule-values
8492 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8494 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8497 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8500 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8501 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8504 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8507 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8508 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8509 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8512 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8516 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
8517 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
8518 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
8519 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
8520 no effect on the conflict report.
8523 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
8525 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
8526 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
8532 Turn off all the warnings.
8534 Treat warnings as errors.
8537 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8538 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8539 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8548 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
8549 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8550 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8552 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8553 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8554 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8555 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8556 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8557 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
8558 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8562 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8565 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8566 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8567 definition for @var{name}.
8569 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8570 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8571 definitions for @var{name}.
8573 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8574 definitions for @var{name}.
8577 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8578 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8579 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8581 @item -L @var{language}
8582 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8583 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8584 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8585 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8586 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8588 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8592 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8594 @item -p @var{prefix}
8595 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8596 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8597 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8601 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8602 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8603 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8604 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8605 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8606 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8609 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8610 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8611 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8613 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8614 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8615 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8616 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8618 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8619 file in the Bison installation directory.
8620 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8621 current working directory.
8622 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8625 @itemx --token-table
8626 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8633 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8634 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8635 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8636 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8639 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8640 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8641 with other short options.
8643 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8644 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8645 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8646 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8648 @item -r @var{things}
8649 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8650 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8651 separated list of @var{things} among:
8655 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8659 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8660 each rule's lookahead set.
8663 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8664 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8667 @item --report-file=@var{file}
8668 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
8672 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8673 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
8674 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8677 @itemx --output=@var{file}
8678 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
8680 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
8681 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
8683 @item -g [@var{file}]
8684 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
8685 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
8686 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
8687 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
8688 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8689 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8692 @item -x [@var{file}]
8693 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
8694 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
8695 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8696 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8698 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
8699 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8702 @node Option Cross Key
8703 @section Option Cross Key
8705 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
8706 the corresponding short option and directive.
8708 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
8709 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
8710 @include cross-options.texi
8714 @section Yacc Library
8716 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
8717 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
8718 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
8719 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
8720 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
8721 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
8722 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
8724 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
8725 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
8728 int yyerror (char const *);
8731 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
8732 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
8733 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
8739 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
8741 @node Other Languages
8742 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
8745 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
8746 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
8750 @section C++ Parsers
8753 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
8754 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
8755 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
8756 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8757 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
8758 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
8761 @node C++ Bison Interface
8762 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
8763 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
8767 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
8768 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8769 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
8770 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8772 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
8774 @findex %define namespace
8775 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
8776 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
8777 generated in the following files:
8782 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
8783 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
8786 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
8789 @itemx @var{file}.cc
8790 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
8791 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
8792 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
8793 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
8795 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
8796 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
8797 @samp{%defines} directive.
8800 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
8801 for a complete and accurate documentation.
8803 @node C++ Semantic Values
8804 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
8805 @c - No objects in unions
8807 @c - Printer and destructor
8809 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
8810 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
8811 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
8812 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
8813 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
8816 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
8817 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
8818 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
8820 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
8821 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
8822 to such objects are allowed.
8825 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
8826 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
8827 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
8831 @node C++ Location Values
8832 @subsection C++ Location Values
8836 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
8838 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
8839 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. Two auxiliary classes
8840 define a @code{position}, a single point in a file, and a @code{location}, a
8841 range composed of a pair of @code{position}s (possibly spanning several
8844 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
8845 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
8846 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
8847 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
8848 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
8851 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
8852 The line, starting at 1.
8855 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8856 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
8859 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
8860 The column, starting at 0.
8863 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8864 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
8867 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8868 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8869 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8870 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8871 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
8874 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
8875 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
8876 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
8877 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
8880 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
8881 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
8882 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8885 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8886 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8887 Advance the @code{end} position.
8890 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
8891 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
8892 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
8893 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
8896 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
8897 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
8901 @node C++ Parser Interface
8902 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
8903 @c - define parser_class_name
8905 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8907 @c - Reporting errors
8909 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
8910 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
8911 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
8912 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
8913 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
8914 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
8915 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
8916 additional argument for its constructor.
8918 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
8919 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
8920 The types for semantics value and locations.
8923 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
8924 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
8925 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
8926 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
8927 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
8928 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
8931 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8932 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
8933 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
8936 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
8937 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
8940 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
8941 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
8942 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
8946 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
8947 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
8948 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
8949 or nonzero, full tracing.
8952 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
8953 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
8954 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
8955 described by @var{m}.
8959 @node C++ Scanner Interface
8960 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
8961 @c - prefix for yylex.
8962 @c - Pure interface to yylex
8965 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
8966 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
8967 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
8969 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8970 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8971 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
8972 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
8976 @node A Complete C++ Example
8977 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
8979 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
8980 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
8981 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
8982 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
8983 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
8984 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
8985 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
8986 actually easier to interface with.
8989 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
8990 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
8991 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
8992 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
8993 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
8996 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8997 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8999 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9000 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9001 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9002 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9003 of valid input follows.
9007 seven := one + two * three
9011 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9012 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9014 @c - A place to store error messages
9015 @c - A place for the result
9017 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9018 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9019 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9020 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9021 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9022 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9023 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9025 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9026 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9027 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9030 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9032 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9033 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9036 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9041 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9042 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9043 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9044 factor both as follows.
9046 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9048 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9050 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
9051 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
9052 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
9053 calcxx_driver& driver)
9054 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9059 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9062 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9064 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9069 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9071 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9077 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
9078 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
9080 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9082 // Handling the scanner.
9085 bool trace_scanning;
9089 Similarly for the parser itself.
9091 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9093 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
9094 int parse (const std::string& f);
9100 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9101 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9102 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9103 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9105 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9108 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9109 void error (const std::string& m);
9111 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9114 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9115 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9116 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9117 messages and set error state.
9119 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9121 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9122 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9124 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9125 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9127 variables["one"] = 1;
9128 variables["two"] = 2;
9131 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9136 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9140 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9141 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9142 int res = parser.parse ();
9148 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9150 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9154 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9156 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9161 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9163 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9164 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9165 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
9166 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
9169 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9171 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9172 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9174 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9178 @findex %code requires
9179 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
9180 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
9181 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
9182 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9183 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
9184 use a forward declaration of the driver.
9185 @xref{%code Summary}.
9187 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9191 class calcxx_driver;
9196 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9197 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9200 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9202 // The parsing context.
9203 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9204 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9208 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
9209 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9210 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9211 automatically propagated.
9213 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9218 // Initialize the initial location.
9219 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9224 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
9225 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
9228 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9235 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
9238 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9250 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9251 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9253 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9256 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9262 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9263 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
9264 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
9265 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
9268 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9270 %token END 0 "end of file"
9272 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9273 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
9278 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
9281 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9282 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9284 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
9285 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
9287 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <ival>
9291 The grammar itself is straightforward.
9293 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9297 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9299 assignments: assignments assignment @{@}
9300 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
9303 "identifier" ":=" exp
9304 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
9308 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9309 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9310 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9311 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9312 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
9313 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
9318 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9321 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9324 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
9325 const std::string& m)
9327 driver.error (l, m);
9331 @node Calc++ Scanner
9332 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9334 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9335 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9337 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9339 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9344 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9345 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9347 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9348 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9349 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9350 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
9354 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
9355 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
9356 not of token_type. */
9357 #define yyterminate() return token::END
9362 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9363 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9364 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9365 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
9367 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9369 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9373 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9375 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9377 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9383 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9384 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9385 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
9386 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
9387 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9388 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9389 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9391 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9395 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
9402 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
9403 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
9407 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
9408 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
9409 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
9410 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
9412 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9415 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
9417 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
9418 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
9419 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
9422 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9423 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9424 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
9426 return token::NUMBER;
9428 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
9429 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
9434 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
9435 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9437 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9441 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9443 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9446 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9448 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
9449 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
9456 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9463 @node Calc++ Top Level
9464 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9466 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9468 @comment file: calc++.cc
9471 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9475 main (int argc, char *argv[])
9477 calcxx_driver driver;
9478 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
9479 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
9480 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9481 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
9482 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9483 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
9484 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9490 @section Java Parsers
9493 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
9494 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
9495 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
9496 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9497 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
9498 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
9499 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9500 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
9503 @node Java Bison Interface
9504 @subsection Java Bison Interface
9505 @c - %language "Java"
9507 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
9508 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9510 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
9511 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
9513 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9514 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
9515 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
9516 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
9517 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
9518 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
9519 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
9520 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
9521 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
9522 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
9524 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
9526 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
9527 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
9528 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
9529 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
9532 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
9533 api.push-pull} have no effect.
9535 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
9536 @code{glr-parser} directive.
9538 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
9539 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
9541 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
9542 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
9543 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
9544 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
9545 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
9546 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
9547 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
9548 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
9549 access the token names and codes.
9551 @node Java Semantic Values
9552 @subsection Java Semantic Values
9553 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
9555 @c - Printer and destructor
9557 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
9558 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
9559 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
9562 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
9563 %type <Integer> number
9566 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
9567 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
9568 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
9569 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
9570 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
9573 %define stype "ASTNode"
9577 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
9578 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
9580 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9581 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
9582 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
9583 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
9584 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
9585 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
9587 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
9588 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
9589 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
9591 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
9592 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
9593 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
9596 @node Java Location Values
9597 @subsection Java Location Values
9602 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
9603 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
9604 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
9605 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9606 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
9607 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
9608 renamed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
9610 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
9611 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
9612 with @code{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
9613 be supplied by the user.
9616 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
9617 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
9618 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9621 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
9622 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9625 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
9626 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9629 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
9630 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
9631 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
9632 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
9636 @node Java Parser Interface
9637 @subsection Java Parser Interface
9638 @c - define parser_class_name
9640 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9642 @c - Reporting errors
9644 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
9645 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
9646 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
9647 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
9648 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
9650 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
9651 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
9652 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
9653 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
9654 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
9655 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
9657 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
9658 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
9659 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
9660 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
9662 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
9663 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
9664 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
9665 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
9666 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
9667 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
9669 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
9670 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
9672 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
9673 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
9674 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
9675 which initialize them automatically.
9677 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
9678 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
9680 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9681 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
9682 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
9686 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9687 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
9688 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
9690 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
9691 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
9692 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
9695 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
9696 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
9697 @code{false} otherwise.
9700 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
9701 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
9702 from a syntax error.
9703 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9706 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
9707 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
9708 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9712 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
9713 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
9714 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9715 or nonzero, full tracing.
9719 @node Java Scanner Interface
9720 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
9723 @c - Lexer interface
9725 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
9726 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
9727 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
9728 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
9730 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
9731 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
9732 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
9733 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
9736 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
9737 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
9738 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
9739 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
9742 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
9744 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
9745 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
9746 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
9747 changed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
9750 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
9751 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9752 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
9755 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
9756 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9759 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
9760 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
9761 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
9762 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
9763 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
9765 The return type can be changed using @code{%define position_type
9766 "@var{class-name}".}
9769 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
9770 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
9772 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
9773 "@var{class-name}".}
9777 @node Java Action Features
9778 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
9780 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
9781 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
9783 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
9784 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
9787 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9788 This may not be assigned to.
9789 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9792 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
9793 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
9794 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9798 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
9799 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
9800 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
9801 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
9802 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
9803 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9806 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
9807 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
9808 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
9809 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
9811 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9815 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9816 This may not be assigned to.
9817 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9821 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
9822 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9825 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
9826 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
9827 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9830 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
9831 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
9832 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9835 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
9836 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
9837 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9840 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
9841 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
9842 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
9844 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9847 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
9848 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
9849 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
9850 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
9855 @node Java Differences
9856 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9858 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
9859 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
9860 section summarizes these differences.
9864 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
9865 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
9866 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
9867 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
9868 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
9869 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
9870 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9872 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
9873 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
9874 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
9875 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
9876 corresponds to these C macros.}.
9879 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
9880 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
9881 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
9882 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
9883 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
9884 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
9885 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
9886 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
9887 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9890 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
9892 @item @code{%code imports}
9893 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
9894 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
9895 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
9897 @item unqualified @code{%code}
9898 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
9900 @item @code{%code lexer}
9901 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
9902 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
9903 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
9907 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
9908 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
9909 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
9911 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
9912 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
9917 @node Java Declarations Summary
9918 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
9920 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
9921 meaning when used in a Java parser.
9923 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
9924 Generate a Java class for the parser.
9927 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9928 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
9929 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
9930 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
9931 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9934 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9935 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
9936 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
9937 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9940 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9941 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
9942 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
9943 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9946 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
9947 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
9948 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9951 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
9952 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
9954 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9957 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9958 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
9959 @xref{Java Differences}.
9962 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9963 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
9964 @xref{Java Differences}.
9967 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9968 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
9969 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9972 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
9973 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
9974 @emph{outside} the parser class.
9975 @xref{Java Differences}.
9978 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
9979 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
9980 @xref{Java Differences}.
9983 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
9984 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
9985 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9988 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
9989 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
9990 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9993 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
9994 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
9995 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9998 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
9999 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10001 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10004 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10005 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10006 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10007 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10010 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
10011 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10012 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10013 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10014 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10017 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10018 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10019 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10022 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10023 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10024 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10025 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10028 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
10029 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10030 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10031 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10034 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10035 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10036 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10039 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10040 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10041 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10044 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10045 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10046 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10049 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10050 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10051 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10052 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10056 @c ================================================= FAQ
10059 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10060 @cindex frequently asked questions
10063 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10067 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10068 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10069 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10070 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10071 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10072 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10073 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10074 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10075 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10076 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10077 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10078 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10081 @node Memory Exhausted
10082 @section Memory Exhausted
10085 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10086 message. What can I do?
10089 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
10092 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10093 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10095 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10096 following typical questions:
10099 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10100 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10101 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10108 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10109 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10110 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10113 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10114 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10115 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10116 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10117 @file{first-line.l}:
10123 #include <stdlib.h>
10127 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10131 yyparse (char const *file)
10133 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10137 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10141 /* One token only. */
10143 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10146 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10164 If the file @file{input} contains
10172 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10175 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10176 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10177 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10182 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10183 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10184 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10185 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10186 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10187 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10188 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10189 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10192 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10193 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10194 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10195 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10197 @node Strings are Destroyed
10198 @section Strings are Destroyed
10201 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10202 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10203 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10206 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10207 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10208 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10214 char *yylval = NULL;
10219 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10227 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10228 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10229 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10230 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10236 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10239 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10240 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10241 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10247 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10248 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10249 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10250 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10251 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10252 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10255 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10256 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10257 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10262 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10263 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10266 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10267 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10270 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10271 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10272 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10273 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10274 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10275 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10276 execute simple instructions one after the others.
10278 @cindex abstract syntax tree
10280 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10281 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10282 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10283 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10284 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10285 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10288 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10289 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10292 @node Multiple start-symbols
10293 @section Multiple start-symbols
10296 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
10297 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
10298 multiple entry points.
10301 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
10302 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
10303 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
10304 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10308 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
10310 start: START_FOO foo
10314 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10315 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10317 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10318 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10319 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10320 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10321 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10322 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10323 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10324 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10327 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10332 int t = start_token;
10337 /* @r{The rules.} */
10341 @node Secure? Conform?
10342 @section Secure? Conform?
10345 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10348 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10349 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10350 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10351 please send us a bug report.
10353 @node I can't build Bison
10354 @section I can't build Bison
10357 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10358 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10362 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10363 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10364 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10365 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10366 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10367 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10368 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10371 @node Where can I find help?
10372 @section Where can I find help?
10375 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10378 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10379 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10380 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10381 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10382 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10383 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10384 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10385 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10389 @section Bug Reports
10392 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10395 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10396 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10397 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10398 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10399 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10401 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10402 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10403 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10404 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10405 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10407 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10408 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10409 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10410 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10411 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10412 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10414 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10415 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
10417 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10419 @node More Languages
10420 @section More Languages
10423 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10424 favorite language here}?
10427 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10428 languages; contributions are welcome.
10431 @section Beta Testing
10434 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10437 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10438 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10439 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10440 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10441 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10442 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10443 essentially halted.
10445 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10446 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10447 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10448 systems are especially welcome.
10450 @node Mailing Lists
10451 @section Mailing Lists
10454 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10457 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10459 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10461 @node Table of Symbols
10462 @appendix Bison Symbols
10463 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
10464 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10466 @deffn {Variable} @@$
10467 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10468 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10471 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10472 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
10473 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10476 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
10477 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10481 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
10482 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10486 @deffn {Variable} $$
10487 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
10491 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
10492 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
10493 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
10496 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
10497 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10501 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
10502 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10506 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
10507 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
10508 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
10509 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
10512 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
10513 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
10514 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
10515 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
10516 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
10520 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
10521 Comment delimiters, as in C.
10524 @deffn {Delimiter} :
10525 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
10529 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
10530 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10533 @deffn {Delimiter} |
10534 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
10535 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10538 @deffn {Directive} <*>
10539 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
10542 This feature is experimental.
10543 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10546 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10549 @deffn {Directive} <>
10550 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
10553 This feature is experimental.
10554 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10557 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10560 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
10561 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
10562 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
10563 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
10566 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
10567 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
10568 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
10569 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
10570 @xref{%code Summary}.
10573 @deffn {Directive} %debug
10574 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10578 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
10579 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10580 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10585 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
10586 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
10587 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
10588 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
10591 @deffn {Directive} %defines
10592 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
10593 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10596 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
10597 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
10598 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10601 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
10602 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
10603 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10606 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
10607 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
10608 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
10612 @deffn {Symbol} $end
10613 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
10614 used in the grammar.
10617 @deffn {Symbol} error
10618 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
10619 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
10620 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
10621 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
10622 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
10623 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
10624 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
10625 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10628 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
10629 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
10630 when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
10633 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10634 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
10638 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
10639 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
10640 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10643 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
10644 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
10647 @deffn {Directive} %language
10648 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
10649 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10652 @deffn {Directive} %left
10653 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
10654 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10657 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10658 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10659 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
10663 @deffn {Directive} %merge
10664 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
10665 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
10666 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
10667 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10670 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10671 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10675 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
10676 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10677 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10682 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
10683 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
10684 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10687 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
10688 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
10689 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10692 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
10693 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
10694 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10697 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10698 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10699 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
10700 Function @code{yyparse}}.
10703 @deffn {Directive} %prec
10704 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
10705 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
10708 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
10709 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
10710 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
10711 unreasonable usage.
10714 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
10715 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
10716 Require a Version of Bison}.
10719 @deffn {Directive} %right
10720 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
10721 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10724 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
10725 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
10726 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10729 @deffn {Directive} %start
10730 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
10734 @deffn {Directive} %token
10735 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
10736 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
10739 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
10740 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
10741 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10744 @deffn {Directive} %type
10745 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
10746 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
10749 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
10750 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
10751 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
10755 @deffn {Directive} %union
10756 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
10757 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
10760 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
10761 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
10762 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
10763 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
10764 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10766 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
10770 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
10771 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
10772 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
10773 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10775 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
10779 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
10780 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
10781 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10784 @deffn {Variable} yychar
10785 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
10786 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
10787 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
10788 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10791 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
10792 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
10793 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10796 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
10797 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
10798 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10801 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
10802 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
10803 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
10804 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10807 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
10808 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
10809 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10812 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
10813 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
10814 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
10815 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
10816 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10818 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
10822 @deffn {Function} yyerror
10823 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
10824 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
10825 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10828 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
10829 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
10830 to request verbose, specific error message strings
10831 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
10832 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
10833 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
10836 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
10837 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
10838 @xref{Memory Management}.
10841 @deffn {Function} yylex
10842 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
10843 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
10847 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
10848 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
10849 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
10850 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
10851 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10854 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
10855 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
10856 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10857 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10859 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
10861 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
10862 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
10863 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
10866 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
10867 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
10868 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
10871 @deffn {Variable} yylval
10872 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
10873 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10874 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10876 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
10877 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
10878 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
10881 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
10882 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
10886 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
10887 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
10888 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
10889 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
10890 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10893 @deffn {Function} yyparse
10894 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
10895 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10898 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
10899 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10900 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
10901 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
10902 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
10903 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10904 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10907 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
10908 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10909 call this function to create a new parser.
10910 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
10911 @code{yypstate_new}}.
10912 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10913 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10916 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
10917 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10918 parse the rest of the input stream.
10919 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
10920 @code{yypull_parse}}.
10921 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10922 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10925 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
10926 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10927 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
10928 @code{yypush_parse}}.
10929 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10930 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10933 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
10934 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
10935 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
10936 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
10937 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10940 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
10941 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
10942 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
10943 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10946 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
10947 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
10948 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
10949 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
10950 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
10951 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
10952 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
10954 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
10955 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
10956 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
10957 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
10958 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
10959 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
10960 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
10963 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
10964 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
10965 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
10973 @item Accepting state
10974 A state whose only action is the accept action.
10975 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
10976 @xref{Understanding,,}.
10978 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
10979 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
10980 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
10981 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
10982 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10984 @item Consistent state
10985 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
10987 @item Context-free grammars
10988 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
10989 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
10990 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
10991 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
10994 @item Default reduction
10995 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
10996 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
10997 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
10998 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11001 @item Defaulted state
11002 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11004 @item Dynamic allocation
11005 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11006 compile time or on entry to a function.
11009 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11010 character string of length zero.
11012 @item Finite-state stack machine
11013 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11014 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11015 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11016 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11017 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11018 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11020 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11021 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11022 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11023 deterministic parsing
11024 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11025 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11026 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11030 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11031 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11032 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11034 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11035 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11036 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11037 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11038 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11039 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11040 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11041 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11042 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11043 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11045 @item Infix operator
11046 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11047 performs some operation.
11050 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11052 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11053 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11054 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11055 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11056 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11057 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11058 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11060 @item Language construct
11061 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11062 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11063 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11065 @item Left associativity
11066 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11067 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11068 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11070 @item Left recursion
11071 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11072 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11075 @item Left-to-right parsing
11076 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11077 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11079 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11080 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11081 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11083 @item Lexical tie-in
11084 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11085 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11087 @item Literal string token
11088 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11090 @item Lookahead token
11091 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11095 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11096 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11097 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11100 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11101 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11103 @item Nonterminal symbol
11104 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11105 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11106 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11109 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11110 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11113 @item Postfix operator
11114 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11115 performs some operation.
11118 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11119 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11123 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11124 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11125 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11127 @item Reverse polish notation
11128 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11130 @item Right recursion
11131 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11132 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11136 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11137 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11138 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11141 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11142 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11143 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11145 @item Single-character literal
11146 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11147 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11150 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11151 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11152 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11153 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11156 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11157 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11158 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11161 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11162 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11165 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11166 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11167 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11168 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11170 @item Terminal symbol
11171 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11172 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11173 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11175 @item Unreachable state
11176 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
11177 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
11178 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
11181 @node Copying This Manual
11182 @appendix Copying This Manual
11186 @unnumbered Bibliography
11190 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
11191 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
11192 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
11193 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
11195 @item [Denny 2010 May]
11196 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
11197 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
11198 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
11199 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
11201 @item [Denny 2010 November]
11202 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
11203 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
11204 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
11205 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
11207 @item [DeRemer 1982]
11208 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
11209 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
11210 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
11211 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
11214 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
11215 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
11216 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
11219 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
11220 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
11221 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
11222 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
11232 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11233 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11234 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11235 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11236 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11237 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11238 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11239 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11240 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11241 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11242 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11243 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11244 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11245 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum
11246 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11247 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11248 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11249 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11250 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11251 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11252 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11253 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11254 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11255 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead
11256 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11257 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11258 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11259 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11260 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11261 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11262 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs
11263 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC
11264 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11265 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative
11266 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11267 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11268 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11269 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz
11270 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
11271 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno
11272 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
11273 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
11274 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
11275 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
11276 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc
11277 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
11278 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
11279 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
11280 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
11281 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
11282 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett
11283 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity
11285 @c Local Variables:
11286 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"