1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
190 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
191 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
192 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
193 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
194 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
196 Outline of a Bison Grammar
198 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
199 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
200 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
201 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
202 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
204 Defining Language Semantics
206 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
207 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
208 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
209 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
210 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
211 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
212 action in the middle of a rule.
216 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
217 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
218 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
222 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
223 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
224 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
225 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
226 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
227 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
228 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
229 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
230 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
231 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
232 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
233 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
234 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
235 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
236 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
238 Parser C-Language Interface
240 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
241 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
242 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
243 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
244 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
245 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
247 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
248 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
249 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
252 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
254 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
255 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
256 of the token it has read.
257 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
258 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
260 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
261 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
263 The Bison Parser Algorithm
265 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
266 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
267 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
268 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
269 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
270 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
271 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
272 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
273 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
274 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
278 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
279 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
280 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
281 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
282 * How Precedence:: How they work.
286 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
287 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
288 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
289 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
291 Handling Context Dependencies
293 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
294 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
295 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
296 error recovery rules must be written.
298 Debugging Your Parser
300 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
301 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
302 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
306 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
307 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
308 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
312 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
313 in alphabetical order by short options.
314 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
315 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
317 Parsers Written In Other Languages
319 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
320 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
324 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
325 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
326 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
327 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
328 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
329 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
333 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
334 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
335 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
337 A Complete C++ Example
339 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
340 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
341 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
342 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
343 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
347 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
348 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
349 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
350 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
351 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
352 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
353 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
354 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
356 Frequently Asked Questions
358 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
359 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
360 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
361 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
362 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
363 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
364 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
365 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
366 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
367 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
368 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
369 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
373 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
379 @unnumbered Introduction
382 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
383 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
384 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
385 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
386 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
387 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
388 calculators to complex programming languages.
390 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
391 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
392 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
393 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
394 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
397 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
398 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
399 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
400 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
403 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
404 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
405 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
406 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
407 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
408 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
411 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
414 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
416 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
417 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
418 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
419 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
420 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
422 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
424 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
425 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
426 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
427 License to all of the Bison source code.
429 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
430 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
431 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
432 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
433 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
434 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
435 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
437 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
438 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
439 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
440 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
441 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
442 using the other GNU tools.
444 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
445 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
446 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
447 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
451 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
452 @include gpl-3.0.texi
455 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
457 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
458 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
459 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
462 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
463 as mathematical ideas.
464 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
465 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
466 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
467 the name of an identifier, etc.).
468 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
469 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
470 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
471 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
472 how is the output used?
473 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
474 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
477 @node Language and Grammar
478 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
480 @cindex context-free grammar
481 @cindex grammar, context-free
482 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
483 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
484 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
485 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
486 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
487 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
488 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
489 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
493 @cindex Backus-Naur form
494 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
495 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
496 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
497 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
498 essentially machine-readable BNF.
500 @cindex LALR grammars
501 @cindex IELR grammars
503 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
504 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
505 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
506 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
507 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
508 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
509 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
510 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
511 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
512 Construction}, to learn how.
515 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
516 @cindex ambiguous grammars
517 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
519 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
520 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
521 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
522 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
523 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
524 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
525 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
526 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
527 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
528 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
529 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
530 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
531 possible parses of any given string is finite.
533 @cindex symbols (abstract)
535 @cindex syntactic grouping
536 @cindex grouping, syntactic
537 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
538 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
539 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
540 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
541 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
542 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
543 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
545 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
546 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
547 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
548 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
549 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
550 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
551 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
552 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
553 lexicography, not grammar.)
555 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
558 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
559 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
560 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
561 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
562 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
563 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
564 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
567 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
568 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
569 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
570 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
571 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
572 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
573 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
574 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
576 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
577 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
578 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
579 reads informally as follows:
582 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
587 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
591 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
592 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
593 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
594 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
597 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
598 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
599 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
600 not the start symbol.
602 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
603 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
604 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
605 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
606 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
607 reports a syntax error.
609 @node Grammar in Bison
610 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
611 @cindex Bison grammar
612 @cindex grammar, Bison
613 @cindex formal grammar
615 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
616 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
617 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
619 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
620 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
621 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
623 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
624 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
625 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
626 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
627 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
628 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
629 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
632 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
633 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
634 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
635 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
637 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
638 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
640 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
641 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
642 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
643 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
647 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
651 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
653 @node Semantic Values
654 @section Semantic Values
655 @cindex semantic value
656 @cindex value, semantic
658 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
659 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
660 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
661 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
662 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
665 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
666 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
667 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
668 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
669 ,Defining Language Semantics},
672 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
673 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
674 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
675 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
678 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
679 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
680 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
681 need to have any semantic value.)
683 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
684 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
685 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
686 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
687 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
688 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
690 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
691 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
692 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
693 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
694 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
696 @node Semantic Actions
697 @section Semantic Actions
698 @cindex semantic actions
699 @cindex actions, semantic
701 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
702 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
703 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
704 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
707 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
708 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
709 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
710 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
711 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
712 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
713 newly recognized larger expression.
715 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
719 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
723 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
724 from the values of the two subexpressions.
727 @section Writing GLR Parsers
729 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
732 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
733 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
735 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
736 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
737 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
738 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
739 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
740 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
741 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
742 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
743 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
745 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
746 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
747 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
748 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
749 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
750 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
751 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
752 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
753 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
754 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
755 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
756 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
757 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
758 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
759 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
760 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
761 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
762 identical set of symbols.
764 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
765 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
766 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
767 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
768 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
769 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
770 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
771 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
772 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
776 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
777 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
778 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
779 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
780 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
783 @node Simple GLR Parsers
784 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
785 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
786 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
790 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
791 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
793 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
794 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
795 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
797 Consider a problem that
798 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
799 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
802 type subrange = lo .. hi;
803 type enum = (a, b, c);
807 The original language standard allows only numeric
808 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
809 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
810 10206) and many other
811 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
812 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
816 type subrange = (a) .. b;
820 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
821 type with only one value:
828 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
829 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
831 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
832 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
833 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
834 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
835 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
836 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
837 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
838 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
840 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
841 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
842 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
843 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
846 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
847 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
848 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
849 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
850 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
851 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
854 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
855 use the GLR algorithm.
856 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
857 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
858 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
859 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
860 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
861 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
862 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
863 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
864 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
866 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
867 reports a syntax error as usual.
869 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
870 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
871 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
872 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
873 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
875 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
876 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
877 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
878 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
879 The present example contains only one conflict between two
880 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
881 cannot be nested. So the number of
882 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
883 and the parsing time is still linear.
885 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
886 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
889 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
899 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
928 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
929 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
930 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
931 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
938 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
939 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
940 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
949 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
950 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
951 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
952 notice when the parser splits.
954 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
955 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
956 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
957 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
958 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
959 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
960 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
961 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
962 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
963 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
964 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
965 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
966 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
969 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
970 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
971 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
972 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
973 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
974 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
976 @node Merging GLR Parses
977 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
978 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
979 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
983 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
985 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
990 #define YYSTYPE char const *
992 void yyerror (char const *);
1006 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1015 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1016 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1017 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1018 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1019 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1023 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1024 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1025 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1026 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1030 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1031 | '(' declarator ')'
1036 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1037 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1044 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1045 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1046 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1047 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1048 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1049 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1050 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1051 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1052 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1053 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1054 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1055 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1056 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1057 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1059 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1060 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1061 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1062 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1063 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1064 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1065 The parser therefore prints
1068 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1071 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1072 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1079 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1080 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1081 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1082 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1083 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1084 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1085 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1086 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1087 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1088 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1094 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1095 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1096 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1097 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1102 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1103 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1108 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1112 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1120 with an accompanying forward declaration
1121 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1125 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1126 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1131 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1132 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1135 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1138 Bison requires that all of the
1139 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1140 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1141 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1142 the offending merge.
1144 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1145 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1147 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1148 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1150 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1151 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1152 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1153 the associated reduction.
1154 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1155 action in a GLR parser.
1158 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1160 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1162 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1163 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1164 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1165 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1166 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1167 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1168 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1169 influence syntax analysis.
1170 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1173 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1174 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1175 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1176 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1177 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1178 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1179 future versions of Bison.
1180 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1181 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1182 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1184 @subsubsection YYERROR
1186 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1187 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1188 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1189 initiate error recovery.
1190 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1191 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1192 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1193 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1194 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1195 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1196 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1197 the parse that invoked the test.
1199 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1200 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1201 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1204 @node Semantic Predicates
1205 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1207 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1209 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1211 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1212 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1213 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1214 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1218 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1219 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1224 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1225 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1226 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1227 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1228 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1229 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1230 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1232 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1233 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1234 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1235 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1238 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1239 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1240 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1244 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1245 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1246 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1247 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1252 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1253 false). However, this
1254 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1255 have overlapping syntax.
1256 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1257 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1258 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1259 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1262 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1263 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1265 @node Compiler Requirements
1266 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1267 @cindex @code{inline}
1268 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1270 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1271 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1272 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1273 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1274 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1275 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1284 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1288 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1289 && ! defined inline)
1298 @cindex textual location
1299 @cindex location, textual
1301 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1302 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1303 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1304 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1306 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1307 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1308 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1309 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1312 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1313 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1314 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1317 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1318 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1319 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1320 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1321 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1322 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1323 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1326 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1327 @cindex Bison parser
1328 @cindex Bison utility
1329 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1332 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1333 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1334 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1335 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1336 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1337 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1338 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1341 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1342 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1343 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1346 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1347 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1348 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1349 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1350 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1351 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1352 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1354 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1355 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1356 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1357 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1358 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1359 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1360 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1361 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1362 C-Language Interface}.
1364 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1365 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1366 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1367 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1368 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1369 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1370 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1371 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1372 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1373 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1374 anything other than their usual meanings.
1376 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1377 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1378 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1379 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1380 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1381 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1382 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1383 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1384 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1387 @section Stages in Using Bison
1388 @cindex stages in using Bison
1391 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1392 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1396 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1397 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1398 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1399 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1400 sequence of C statements.
1403 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1404 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1405 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1406 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1409 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1412 Write error-reporting routines.
1415 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1416 must follow these steps:
1420 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1423 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1426 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1429 @node Grammar Layout
1430 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1431 @cindex grammar file
1433 @cindex format of grammar file
1434 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1436 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1437 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1444 @var{Bison declarations}
1453 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1454 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1456 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1457 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1458 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1459 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1460 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1461 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1463 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1464 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1465 semantic values of various symbols.
1467 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1470 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1471 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1472 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1476 @cindex simple examples
1477 @cindex examples, simple
1479 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1480 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1481 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1482 and a multi-function calculator. All
1483 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1485 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1486 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1487 source file to try them.
1490 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1491 a first example with no operator precedence.
1492 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1493 Operator precedence is introduced.
1494 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1495 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1496 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1497 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1498 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1502 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1503 @cindex reverse polish notation
1504 @cindex polish notation calculator
1505 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1506 @cindex calculator, simple
1508 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1509 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1510 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1511 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1513 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1514 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1517 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1518 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1519 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1520 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1521 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1522 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1523 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1526 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1527 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1529 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1530 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1532 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1534 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1537 #define YYSTYPE double
1541 void yyerror (char const *);
1546 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1549 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1550 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1552 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1553 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1554 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1555 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1556 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1557 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1558 which is a floating point number.
1560 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1561 function @code{pow}.
1563 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1564 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1565 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1566 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1569 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1570 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1571 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1572 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1573 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1574 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1575 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1576 type for numeric constants.
1579 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1581 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1583 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1595 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1602 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1603 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1604 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1605 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1606 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1607 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1613 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1614 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1615 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1616 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1617 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1620 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1621 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1622 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1624 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1625 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1626 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1627 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1628 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1629 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1632 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1633 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1634 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1638 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1640 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1649 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1650 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1651 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1652 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1653 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1655 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1656 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1657 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1658 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1659 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1660 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1662 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1663 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1664 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1665 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1668 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1669 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1670 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1673 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1675 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1680 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1684 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1685 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1686 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1687 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1688 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1689 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1690 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1692 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1693 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1694 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1695 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1696 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1699 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1701 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1702 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1703 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1704 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1709 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1710 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1715 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1716 equally well have written them separately:
1720 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1721 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1725 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1726 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1727 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1728 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1729 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1730 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1731 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1732 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1734 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1735 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1736 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1738 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1739 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1743 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1747 means the same thing as this:
1752 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1758 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1761 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1762 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1763 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1765 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1766 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1767 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1768 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1770 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1772 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1773 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1774 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1775 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1777 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1778 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1779 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1780 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1781 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1782 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1783 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1784 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1785 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1787 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1788 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1789 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1790 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1791 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1793 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1794 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1796 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1798 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1801 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1802 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1803 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1804 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1815 /* Skip white space. */
1816 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1820 /* Process numbers. */
1821 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1824 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1829 /* Return end-of-input. */
1832 /* Return a single char. */
1839 @subsection The Controlling Function
1840 @cindex controlling function
1841 @cindex main function in simple example
1843 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1844 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1845 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1847 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1859 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1860 @cindex error reporting routine
1862 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1863 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1864 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1865 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1866 here is the definition we will use:
1868 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1875 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1877 yyerror (char const *s)
1879 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1884 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1885 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1886 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1887 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1888 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1889 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1891 @node Rpcalc Generate
1892 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1893 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1895 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1896 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1897 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1898 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1899 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1900 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1902 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1903 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1905 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1906 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1913 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1914 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1915 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1916 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1917 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1918 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1919 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1921 @node Rpcalc Compile
1922 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1923 @cindex compiling the parser
1925 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1929 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1931 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1935 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1936 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1937 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1941 # @r{List files again.}
1943 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1947 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1948 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1954 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1956 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1959 @result{} -3.166666667
1960 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1962 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1967 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1968 @cindex infix notation calculator
1970 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1972 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1973 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1974 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1975 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1978 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1982 #define YYSTYPE double
1986 void yyerror (char const *);
1991 /* Bison declarations. */
1995 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1996 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1999 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2010 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2017 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2018 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2019 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2020 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2021 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2022 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2023 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2030 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2033 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2035 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2036 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2037 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2038 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2039 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2040 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2041 the associativity/precedence.)
2043 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2044 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2045 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2046 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2047 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2048 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2051 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2052 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2053 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2054 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2055 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2057 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2062 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2070 @node Simple Error Recovery
2071 @section Simple Error Recovery
2072 @cindex error recovery, simple
2074 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2075 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2076 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2077 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2078 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2079 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2081 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2082 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2083 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2089 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2090 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2095 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2096 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2097 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2098 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2099 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2100 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2101 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2102 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2105 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2106 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2107 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2108 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2109 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2110 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2113 @node Location Tracking Calc
2114 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2115 @cindex location tracking calculator
2116 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2117 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2119 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2120 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2121 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2122 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2126 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2127 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2128 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2131 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2132 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2134 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2135 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2138 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2144 void yyerror (char const *);
2147 /* Bison declarations. */
2155 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2159 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2160 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2161 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2162 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2163 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2164 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2165 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2169 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2171 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2172 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2173 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2174 from the new information.
2176 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2177 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2190 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2197 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2198 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2199 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2209 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2210 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2211 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2216 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2217 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2218 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2222 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2223 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2224 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2226 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2227 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2228 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2229 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2230 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2231 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2235 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2237 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2238 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2239 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2242 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2243 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2254 /* Skip white space. */
2255 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2256 ++yylloc.last_column;
2261 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2262 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2266 /* Process numbers. */
2270 ++yylloc.last_column;
2271 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2273 ++yylloc.last_column;
2274 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2281 /* Return end-of-input. */
2286 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2290 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2293 ++yylloc.last_column;
2299 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2300 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2301 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2302 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2304 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2305 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2306 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2307 controlling function:
2314 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2315 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2321 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2322 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2323 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2325 @node Multi-function Calc
2326 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2327 @cindex multi-function calculator
2328 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2329 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2331 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2332 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2333 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2334 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2335 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2337 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2338 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2339 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2340 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2341 functions whose syntax has this form:
2344 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2348 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2349 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2350 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2355 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2356 @result{} 3.1415926536
2360 @result{} 0.0000000000
2362 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2363 @result{} 2.3000000000
2365 @result{} 2.3000000000
2367 @result{} 0.8329091229
2368 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2369 @result{} 2.3000000000
2373 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2376 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2377 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2378 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2379 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2380 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2383 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2384 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2386 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2388 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2392 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2393 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2394 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2396 void yyerror (char const *);
2402 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2403 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2406 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2407 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2414 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2415 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2419 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2420 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2421 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2423 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2424 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2425 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2426 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2428 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2429 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2430 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2431 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2432 between angle brackets).
2434 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2435 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2436 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2437 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2438 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2439 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2442 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2444 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2445 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2446 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2448 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2450 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2461 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2462 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2469 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2470 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2471 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2472 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2473 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2474 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2475 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2476 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2477 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2478 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2481 /* End of grammar. */
2485 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2486 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2487 @cindex symbol table example
2489 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2490 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2491 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2492 requires some additional C functions for support.
2494 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2495 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2496 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2498 @comment file: calc.h
2501 /* Function type. */
2502 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2506 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2509 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2510 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2513 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2514 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2516 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2521 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2523 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2524 extern symrec *sym_table;
2526 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2527 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2531 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2534 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2540 double (*fnct) (double);
2545 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2558 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2563 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2569 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2571 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2572 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2578 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2579 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2581 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2582 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2583 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2584 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2585 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2586 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2588 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2590 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2591 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2595 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2597 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2598 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2599 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2600 ptr->type = sym_type;
2601 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2602 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2610 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2613 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2614 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2615 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2623 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2625 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2626 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2627 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2628 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2630 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2631 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2632 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2633 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2634 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2635 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2637 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2638 operators in @code{yylex}.
2640 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2652 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2653 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2661 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2662 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2665 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2671 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2674 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2675 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2676 static size_t length = 40;
2677 static char *symbuf = 0;
2682 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2688 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2692 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2694 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2696 /* Get another character. */
2701 while (isalnum (c));
2708 s = getsym (symbuf);
2710 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2715 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2722 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2724 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2725 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2726 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2728 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2731 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2733 yyerror (char const *s)
2735 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2741 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2744 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2745 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2746 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2754 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2755 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2756 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2764 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2767 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2768 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2769 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2772 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2773 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2777 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2779 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2780 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2782 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2783 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2786 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2787 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2788 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2789 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2790 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2791 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2792 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2793 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2794 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2797 @node Grammar Outline
2798 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2800 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2801 appropriate delimiters:
2808 @var{Bison declarations}
2817 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2818 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2819 continues until end of line.
2822 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2823 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2824 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2825 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2826 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2830 @subsection The prologue
2831 @cindex declarations section
2833 @cindex declarations
2835 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2836 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2837 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2838 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2839 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2840 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2841 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2843 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2844 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2847 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2848 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2849 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2850 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2851 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2852 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2853 @code{%union} declaration.
2864 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2868 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2869 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2875 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2876 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2877 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2878 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2879 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2880 @code{#include} directives.
2882 @node Prologue Alternatives
2883 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2884 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2887 @findex %code requires
2888 @findex %code provides
2891 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2892 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2893 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2894 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2895 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2896 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2897 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2899 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2910 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2914 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2915 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2922 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2923 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2924 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2925 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2926 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2927 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2928 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2929 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2930 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2931 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2932 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2934 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2935 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2936 This behavior raises a few questions.
2937 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2938 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2939 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2940 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2941 This behavior is not intuitive.
2943 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2944 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2945 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2946 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2953 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2954 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2957 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2958 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2970 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2974 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2975 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2976 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2983 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2984 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2985 explicit which kind you intend.
2986 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2988 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2989 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2990 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2991 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2992 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2993 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2994 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2995 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2996 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2999 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
3000 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
3002 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3020 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3026 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3027 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3040 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3041 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3042 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3050 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3051 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3052 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3053 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3054 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3055 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3057 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3058 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3059 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3060 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3061 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3062 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3063 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3064 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3065 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3066 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3067 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3070 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3071 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3072 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3073 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3074 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3075 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3076 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3077 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3078 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3079 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3097 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3103 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3104 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3117 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3123 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3124 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3132 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3133 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3134 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3137 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3138 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3139 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3140 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3141 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3142 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3145 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3146 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3147 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3148 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3150 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3151 organize your grammar file.
3152 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3157 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3158 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3159 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3160 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3164 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3165 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3166 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3167 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3172 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3173 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3175 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3177 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3178 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3179 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3180 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3182 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3183 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3184 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3185 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3186 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3187 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3188 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3189 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3192 @node Bison Declarations
3193 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3194 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3195 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3197 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3198 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3199 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3200 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3203 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3204 @cindex grammar rules section
3205 @cindex rules section for grammar
3207 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3208 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3210 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3211 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3212 if it is the first thing in the file.
3215 @subsection The epilogue
3216 @cindex additional C code section
3218 @cindex C code, section for additional
3220 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3221 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3222 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3223 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3224 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3225 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3226 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3227 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3228 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3229 C-Language Interface}.
3231 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3232 from the grammar rules.
3234 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3235 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3236 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3237 of the grammar file.
3240 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3241 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3242 @cindex terminal symbol
3246 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3249 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3250 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3251 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3252 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3253 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3254 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3255 the symbol to stand for it.
3257 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3258 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3259 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3261 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3262 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3263 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3264 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3265 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3266 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3267 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3269 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3273 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3274 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3275 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3276 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3279 @cindex character token
3280 @cindex literal token
3281 @cindex single-character literal
3282 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3283 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3284 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3285 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3286 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3287 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3288 ,Operator Precedence}).
3290 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3291 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3292 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3293 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3294 your program will confuse other readers.
3296 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3297 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3298 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3299 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3300 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3301 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3305 @cindex string token
3306 @cindex literal string token
3307 @cindex multicharacter literal
3308 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3309 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3310 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3311 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3312 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3314 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3315 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3316 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3317 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3318 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3320 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3322 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3323 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3324 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3325 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3326 read your program will be confused.
3328 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3329 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3330 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3331 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3332 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3333 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3336 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3337 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3338 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3340 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3341 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3342 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3343 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3344 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3345 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3346 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3347 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3348 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3349 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3350 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3351 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3353 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3354 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3355 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3356 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3357 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3359 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3360 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3361 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3362 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3363 characters in the following C-language string:
3366 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3369 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3370 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3371 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3372 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3373 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3374 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3375 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3376 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3377 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3378 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3381 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3382 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3383 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3384 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3385 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3388 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3390 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3391 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3393 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3397 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3402 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3403 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3404 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3415 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3416 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3418 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3419 extra white space as you wish.
3421 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3422 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3425 @{@var{C statements}@}
3430 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3431 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3432 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3433 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3434 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3435 compiler can check it.
3437 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3438 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3439 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3440 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3441 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3442 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3443 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3444 character constants.
3446 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3450 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3451 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3456 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3457 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3464 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3466 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3467 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3468 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3487 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3491 @section Recursive Rules
3492 @cindex recursive rule
3494 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3495 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3496 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3497 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3498 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3509 @cindex left recursion
3510 @cindex right recursion
3512 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3513 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3514 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3526 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3527 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3528 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3529 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3530 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3531 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3532 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3535 @cindex mutual recursion
3536 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3537 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3538 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3547 | primary '+' primary
3560 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3564 @section Defining Language Semantics
3565 @cindex defining language semantics
3566 @cindex language semantics, defining
3568 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3569 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3570 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3572 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3573 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3574 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3575 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3578 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3579 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3580 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3581 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3582 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3583 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3584 action in the middle of a rule.
3588 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3589 @cindex semantic value type
3590 @cindex value type, semantic
3591 @cindex data types of semantic values
3592 @cindex default data type
3594 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3595 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3596 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3597 Notation Calculator}).
3599 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3600 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3601 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3604 #define YYSTYPE double
3608 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3609 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3610 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3611 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3613 @node Multiple Types
3614 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3616 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3617 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3618 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3619 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3622 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3623 requires you to do two things:
3627 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3628 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3629 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3630 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3634 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3635 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3636 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3637 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3638 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3647 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3649 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3650 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3651 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3652 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3654 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3655 placed at any position in the rule;
3656 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3657 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3658 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3659 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3661 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3662 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3663 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3664 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3665 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3666 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3667 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3668 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3669 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3670 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3673 Here is a typical example:
3679 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3683 Or, in terms of named references:
3689 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3694 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3695 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3696 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3697 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3698 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3699 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3701 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3702 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3703 referred to as @code{$2}.
3705 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3706 references construct.
3708 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3709 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3710 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3711 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3712 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3716 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3720 @cindex default action
3721 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3722 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3723 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3724 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3725 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3726 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3728 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3729 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3730 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3731 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3732 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3737 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3738 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3744 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3749 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3750 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3751 definition of @code{foo}.
3754 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3755 any, from a semantic action.
3756 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3757 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3760 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3761 @cindex action data types
3762 @cindex data types in actions
3764 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3765 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3767 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3768 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3769 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3770 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3771 in the rule. In this example,
3777 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3782 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3783 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3784 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3785 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3787 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3788 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3789 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3801 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3802 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3804 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3805 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3806 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3807 @cindex mid-rule actions
3809 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3810 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3811 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3813 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3814 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3815 it is run before they are parsed.
3817 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3818 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3819 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3820 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3823 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3824 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3825 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3826 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3827 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3828 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3830 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3831 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3832 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3833 at the end of the rule.
3835 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3836 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3837 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3838 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3839 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3840 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3846 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3848 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3853 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3854 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3855 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3856 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3857 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3858 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3859 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3860 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3862 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3863 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3864 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3865 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3866 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3869 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3870 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3871 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3872 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3873 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3875 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3876 Discarded Symbols}).
3877 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3878 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3880 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3881 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3886 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3900 $$ = push_context ();
3901 declare_variable ($3);
3908 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3909 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3910 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3912 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3913 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3914 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3915 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3916 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3922 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3923 | '@{' statements '@}'
3929 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3934 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3935 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3938 | '@{' statements '@}'
3944 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3945 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3946 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3947 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3948 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3949 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3951 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3952 actions into the two rules, like this:
3957 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3958 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3959 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3960 '@{' statements '@}'
3966 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3967 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3969 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3970 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3971 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3976 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3977 declarations statements '@}'
3978 | '@{' statements '@}'
3984 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3985 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3987 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3988 serves as a subroutine:
3993 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3999 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4000 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4006 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4007 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4009 @node Tracking Locations
4010 @section Tracking Locations
4012 @cindex textual location
4013 @cindex location, textual
4015 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4016 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4017 especially symbol locations.
4019 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4020 actions to take when rules are matched.
4023 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4024 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4025 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4029 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4030 @cindex data type of locations
4031 @cindex default location type
4033 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4034 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4036 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4037 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4038 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4039 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4043 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4052 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4053 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4054 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4055 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4056 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4058 @node Actions and Locations
4059 @subsection Actions and Locations
4060 @cindex location actions
4061 @cindex actions, location
4064 @vindex @@@var{name}
4065 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4067 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4068 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4070 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4071 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4072 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4073 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4074 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4077 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4078 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4079 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4080 references construct.
4082 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4090 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4091 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4092 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4093 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4100 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4101 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4102 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4108 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4109 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4110 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4113 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4114 example above simply rewrites this way:
4128 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4129 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4130 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4137 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4138 from a semantic action.
4139 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4140 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4142 @node Location Default Action
4143 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4144 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4145 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4147 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4148 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4149 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4150 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4151 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4152 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4153 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4154 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4157 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4158 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4160 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4161 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4162 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4163 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4164 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4165 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4166 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4167 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4168 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4169 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4171 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4175 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4179 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4180 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4181 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4182 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4186 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4187 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4188 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4189 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4196 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4197 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4198 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4200 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4204 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4205 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4208 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4209 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4210 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4211 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4214 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4215 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4216 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4217 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4220 @node Named References
4221 @section Named References
4222 @cindex named references
4224 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4225 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4226 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4227 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4228 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4229 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4231 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4232 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4233 used as named references. For example:
4237 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4238 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4243 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4247 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4248 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4253 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4259 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4262 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4265 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4270 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4271 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4272 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4275 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4276 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4281 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4282 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4283 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4286 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4287 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4293 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4294 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4297 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4298 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4302 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4303 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4304 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4305 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4306 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4307 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4308 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4310 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4314 @section Bison Declarations
4315 @cindex declarations, Bison
4316 @cindex Bison declarations
4318 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4319 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4322 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4323 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4324 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4325 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4327 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4328 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4329 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4330 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4333 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4334 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4335 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4336 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4337 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4338 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4339 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4340 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4341 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4342 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4343 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4344 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4345 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4346 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4347 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4351 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4352 @cindex version requirement
4353 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4356 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4357 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4361 %require "@var{version}"
4365 @subsection Token Type Names
4366 @cindex declaring token type names
4367 @cindex token type names, declaring
4368 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4371 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4377 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4378 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4379 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4381 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4382 @code{%precedence}, or
4383 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4384 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4387 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4388 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4389 following the token name:
4393 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4397 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4398 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4399 with each other or with normal characters.
4401 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4402 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4403 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4404 Than One Value Type}).
4410 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4414 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4418 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4419 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4420 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4427 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4428 equivalent literal string tokens:
4431 %token <operator> OR "||"
4432 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4437 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4438 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4439 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4440 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4441 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4442 the literal string instead of the token name.
4444 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4445 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4449 %token END 0 "end of file"
4452 @node Precedence Decl
4453 @subsection Operator Precedence
4454 @cindex precedence declarations
4455 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4456 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4458 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4459 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4460 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4461 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4462 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4463 operator precedence.
4465 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4466 @code{%token}: either
4469 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4476 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4479 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4480 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4481 all the @var{symbols}:
4485 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4486 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4487 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4488 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4489 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4490 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4491 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4492 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4493 considered a syntax error.
4495 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4496 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4497 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4500 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4501 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4502 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4503 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4504 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4507 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4508 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4509 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4510 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4515 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4516 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4520 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4521 @cindex declaring value types
4522 @cindex value types, declaring
4525 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4526 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4527 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4542 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4543 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4544 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4545 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4547 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4548 @code{union}. For example:
4560 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4561 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4564 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4565 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4566 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4568 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4569 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4571 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4572 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4573 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4574 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4582 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4587 and then your grammar can use the following
4588 instead of @code{%union}:
4601 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4602 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4603 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4607 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4608 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4609 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4612 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4616 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4617 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4618 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4619 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4620 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4623 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4624 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4625 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4626 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4628 @node Initial Action Decl
4629 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4630 @findex %initial-action
4632 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4633 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4636 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4637 @findex %initial-action
4638 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4639 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4640 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4641 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4644 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4647 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4650 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4655 @node Destructor Decl
4656 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4657 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4661 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4662 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4663 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4664 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4665 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4666 must discard the start symbol.
4668 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4669 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4670 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4671 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4673 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4674 symbol is automatically discarded.
4676 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4678 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4679 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4680 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4681 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4682 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4685 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4686 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4687 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4688 tag among @var{symbols}.
4689 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4690 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4691 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4693 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4694 (These default forms are experimental.
4695 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4697 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4698 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4699 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4700 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4702 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4703 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4704 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4705 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4706 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4713 %union @{ char *string; @}
4714 %token <string> STRING1
4715 %token <string> STRING2
4716 %type <string> string1
4717 %type <string> string2
4718 %union @{ char character; @}
4719 %token <character> CHR
4720 %type <character> chr
4723 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4724 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4725 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4726 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4730 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4731 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4732 to @code{free} by default.
4733 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4734 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4735 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4736 @code{free} only once.
4737 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4738 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4740 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4741 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4742 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4743 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4744 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4745 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4746 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4747 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4748 reference it in your grammar.
4749 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4750 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4756 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4757 @cindex mid-rule actions
4758 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4759 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4760 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4761 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4762 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4763 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4764 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4765 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4769 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4770 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4771 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4776 @cindex discarded symbols
4777 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4781 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4783 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4785 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4786 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4788 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4789 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4792 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4795 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4796 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4799 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4800 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4801 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4805 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4806 @cindex printing semantic values
4810 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4811 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4812 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4813 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4815 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4816 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4817 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4819 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4822 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4823 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4824 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4825 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4826 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4827 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4828 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4831 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4832 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4833 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4834 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4842 %union @{ char *string; @}
4843 %token <string> STRING1
4844 %token <string> STRING2
4845 %type <string> string1
4846 %type <string> string2
4847 %union @{ char character; @}
4848 %token <character> CHR
4849 %type <character> chr
4852 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4853 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4854 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4855 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4859 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4860 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4861 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4862 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4863 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4864 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4865 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4869 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4870 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4871 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4872 @cindex warnings, preventing
4873 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4877 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4878 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4879 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4880 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4881 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4882 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4884 The declaration looks like this:
4890 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4891 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4892 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4893 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4895 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4896 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4897 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4898 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4899 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4900 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4901 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4907 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4911 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4912 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4913 print the number of conflicts.
4916 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4917 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4918 go back to the beginning.
4921 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4922 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4923 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4926 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4927 but will keep silent otherwise.
4930 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4931 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4932 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4933 @cindex default start symbol
4936 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4937 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4938 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4945 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4946 @cindex reentrant parser
4948 @findex %define api.pure
4950 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4951 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4952 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4953 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4954 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4955 program must be called only within interlocks.
4957 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4958 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4959 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4960 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4961 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4963 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4964 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4965 reentrant. It looks like this:
4971 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4972 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4973 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4974 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4975 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4976 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4977 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4978 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4979 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4981 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4982 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4986 @subsection A Push Parser
4989 @findex %define api.push-pull
4991 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4992 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4994 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4995 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4996 each time a new token is made available.
4998 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4999 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
5000 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
5001 within a certain time period.
5003 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
5004 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
5005 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5008 %define api.push-pull push
5011 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5012 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5013 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5014 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5015 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5019 %define api.push-pull push
5022 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5023 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5024 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5025 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5027 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5028 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5029 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5030 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5031 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5032 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5033 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5034 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5038 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5040 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5041 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5042 yypstate_delete (ps);
5045 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5046 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5047 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5048 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5049 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5050 example would thus look like this:
5055 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5058 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5059 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5060 yypstate_delete (ps);
5063 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5064 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5066 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5067 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5068 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5069 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5070 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5071 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5072 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5073 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5074 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5075 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5076 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5077 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5078 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5079 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5080 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5081 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5082 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5086 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5087 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5088 yypstate_delete (ps);
5091 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5092 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5093 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5096 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5097 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5098 @cindex declaration summary
5099 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5101 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5103 @deffn {Directive} %union
5104 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5105 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5108 @deffn {Directive} %token
5109 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5110 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5113 @deffn {Directive} %right
5114 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5115 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5118 @deffn {Directive} %left
5119 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5120 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5123 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5124 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5125 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5126 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5130 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5131 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5132 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5136 @deffn {Directive} %type
5137 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5138 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5141 @deffn {Directive} %start
5142 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5146 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5147 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5148 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5154 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5157 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5158 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5160 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5161 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5162 @xref{%code Summary}.
5165 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5166 Instrument the parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5168 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5171 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5172 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5173 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5174 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5177 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5178 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5179 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5180 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5181 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5183 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5184 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5185 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5186 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5187 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5188 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5189 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5190 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5191 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5192 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5194 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5195 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5196 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5198 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5199 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5200 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5202 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5203 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5204 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5205 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5206 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5208 @findex %code requires
5209 @findex %code provides
5210 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5211 header also contains their code.
5212 @xref{%code Summary}.
5214 @cindex Header guard
5215 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5216 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5217 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5218 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5219 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5222 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5223 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5225 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5226 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5228 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5232 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5233 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5236 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5237 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5238 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5241 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5242 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5243 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5246 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5247 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5248 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5249 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5251 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5255 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5256 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5257 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5258 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5259 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5260 accurate syntax error messages.
5263 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5264 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5265 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5267 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5268 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5269 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5270 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5271 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5272 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5273 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5274 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5276 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5280 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5281 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5282 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5287 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5288 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5289 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5290 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5291 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5292 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5293 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5297 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5298 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5301 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5302 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5303 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5307 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5308 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5309 Require a Version of Bison}.
5312 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5313 Specify the skeleton to use.
5315 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5316 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5317 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5318 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5320 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5321 file in the Bison installation directory.
5322 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5323 directory of the grammar file.
5324 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5327 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5328 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5329 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5330 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5331 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5332 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5333 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5336 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5337 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5338 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5339 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5340 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5341 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5342 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5345 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5346 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5347 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5351 The highest token number, plus one.
5353 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5355 The number of grammar rules,
5357 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5361 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5362 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5363 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5364 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5368 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5369 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5370 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5374 @node %define Summary
5375 @subsection %define Summary
5377 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5378 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5379 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5380 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5381 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5382 @code{%define} directive:
5384 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5385 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5386 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5387 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5389 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5390 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5391 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5392 to specifying @code{""}.
5394 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5395 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5396 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5399 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5400 @code{%define} accepts.
5402 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5403 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5407 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5409 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5410 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5412 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5414 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5415 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5418 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5419 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5420 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5421 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5422 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5423 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5426 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5428 @findex %define api.namespace
5430 @item Languages(s): C++
5432 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5433 For example, if you specify:
5436 %define api.namespace "foo::bar"
5439 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5442 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5445 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5446 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5449 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5455 @item Accepted Values:
5456 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5457 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5459 @item Default Value:
5460 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5461 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5462 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5463 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5464 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5465 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5466 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5469 %define api.namespace "foo"
5470 %name-prefix "bar::"
5473 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5478 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5479 @item @code{api.location.type}
5480 @findex %define api.location.type
5483 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5485 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5486 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5488 @item Accepted Values: String
5490 @item Default Value: none
5492 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.7
5495 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5497 @findex %define api.prefix
5500 @item Language(s): All
5502 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5503 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5505 @item Accepted Values: String
5507 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5509 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5512 @c ================================================== api.pure
5514 @findex %define api.pure
5517 @item Language(s): C
5519 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5520 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5522 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5524 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5530 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5532 @findex %define api.push-pull
5535 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5537 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5538 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5539 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5540 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5542 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5544 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5550 @c ================================================== api.token.constructor
5551 @item api.token.constructor
5552 @findex %define api.token.constructor
5559 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5560 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5561 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5563 @item Accepted Values:
5566 @item Default Value:
5569 introduced in Bison 2.8
5571 @c api.token.constructor
5574 @c ================================================== api.token.prefix
5575 @item api.token.prefix
5576 @findex %define api.token.prefix
5579 @item Languages(s): all
5582 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5583 target language. For instance
5586 %token FILE for ERROR
5587 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
5589 start: FILE for ERROR;
5593 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5594 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5595 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5596 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5597 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5598 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5599 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5601 @item Accepted Values:
5602 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5603 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5604 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5606 @item Default Value:
5609 introduced in Bison 2.8
5614 @c ================================================== lr.default-reduction
5616 @item lr.default-reduction
5617 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
5620 @item Language(s): all
5622 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5623 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5624 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5625 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5627 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5628 @item Default Value:
5630 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5631 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5634 introduced as @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.5, renamed as
5635 @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.8.
5638 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-state
5640 @item lr.keep-unreachable-state
5641 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
5644 @item Language(s): all
5645 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5646 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5647 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5648 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5650 introduced as @code{lr.keep_unreachable_states} in 2.3b, renamed as
5651 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 2.5, and as
5652 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 2.8.
5653 @c lr.keep-unreachable-state
5655 @c ================================================== lr.type
5658 @findex %define lr.type
5661 @item Language(s): all
5663 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5664 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5665 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5667 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5669 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5673 @c ================================================== namespace
5675 @findex %define namespace
5676 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5680 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5682 @findex %define parse.assert
5685 @item Languages(s): C++
5687 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5688 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5690 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5692 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5694 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5699 @c ================================================== parse.error
5701 @findex %define parse.error
5706 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
5707 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
5709 @item Accepted Values:
5712 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
5714 @item @code{verbose}
5715 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
5716 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
5720 @item Default Value:
5726 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5728 @findex %define parse.lac
5731 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5733 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5734 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5735 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5736 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5740 @c ================================================== parse.trace
5742 @findex %define parse.trace
5745 @item Languages(s): C, C++, Java
5747 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
5748 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5750 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with
5751 @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}), see @ref{Multiple Parsers,
5752 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 in the parser implementation
5753 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
5756 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5758 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5762 @c ================================================== variant
5764 @findex %define variant
5771 Request variant-based semantic values.
5772 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5774 @item Accepted Values:
5777 @item Default Value:
5785 @subsection %code Summary
5789 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5790 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5791 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5792 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5793 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5794 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5795 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5796 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5798 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5799 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5800 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5801 in the parser implementation.
5803 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5804 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5805 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5807 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5810 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5811 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5812 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5813 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5814 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5815 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5819 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5820 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5821 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5824 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5825 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5829 @findex %code requires
5832 @item Language(s): C, C++
5834 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5835 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5836 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5837 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5838 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5840 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5841 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5846 @findex %code provides
5849 @item Language(s): C, C++
5851 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5852 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5854 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5855 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5863 @item Language(s): C, C++
5865 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5866 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5867 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5868 parser implementation file. For example:
5877 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5881 @findex %code imports
5884 @item Language(s): Java
5886 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5888 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5889 before any class definitions.
5893 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5894 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5895 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5896 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5899 @node Multiple Parsers
5900 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5902 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5903 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
5904 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
5905 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
5906 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
5907 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
5908 exported in the generated header.
5910 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
5911 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
5912 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
5913 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
5914 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
5915 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
5916 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
5917 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
5918 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
5920 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
5921 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
5922 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
5923 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
5924 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
5925 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
5926 specifically --- more about this below.
5928 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
5929 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
5932 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
5933 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
5934 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5935 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
5938 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
5939 #define yyparse cparse
5940 #define yylval clval
5946 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
5947 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
5948 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
5950 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
5954 extern CSTYPE clval;
5958 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
5959 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
5960 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
5963 /* Enabling traces. */
5965 # if defined YYDEBUG
5982 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
5983 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
5984 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
5987 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5988 @cindex C-language interface
5991 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5992 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5993 functions that it needs to use.
5995 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5996 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5997 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5998 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
6001 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
6002 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
6003 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
6004 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
6005 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
6006 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
6008 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
6009 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
6010 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
6014 @node Parser Function
6015 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
6018 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
6019 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
6020 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
6021 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
6022 without reading further.
6025 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
6026 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
6027 is due to end-of-input).
6029 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
6030 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
6033 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
6036 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
6041 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
6046 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
6049 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
6050 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
6051 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
6053 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6054 @findex %parse-param
6055 Declare that one or more
6056 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
6057 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
6058 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
6059 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
6062 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
6065 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
6069 Then call the parser like this:
6073 int nastiness, randomness;
6074 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
6075 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
6081 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
6084 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
6087 @node Push Parser Function
6088 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
6089 @findex yypush_parse
6091 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6092 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6094 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
6095 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6096 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6097 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6099 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
6100 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6101 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6102 required to finish parsing the grammar.
6105 @node Pull Parser Function
6106 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6107 @findex yypull_parse
6109 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6110 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6112 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6113 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
6114 declaration is used.
6115 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6117 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
6118 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6121 @node Parser Create Function
6122 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6123 @findex yypstate_new
6125 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6126 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6128 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6129 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6130 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6131 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6133 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6134 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6135 or 0 if no memory was available.
6136 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6140 @node Parser Delete Function
6141 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6142 @findex yypstate_delete
6144 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6145 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6147 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6148 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6149 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6150 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6152 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
6153 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6154 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6158 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6160 @cindex lexical analyzer
6162 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6163 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6164 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6165 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6167 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6168 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6169 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6170 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6171 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6172 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6173 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6177 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6178 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6179 of the token it has read.
6180 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6181 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6183 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6184 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6187 @node Calling Convention
6188 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6190 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6191 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6192 signifies end-of-input.
6194 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6195 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6196 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6197 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6199 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6200 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6201 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6202 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6203 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6204 signifies end-of-input.
6206 Here is an example showing these things:
6213 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6216 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6217 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6219 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6225 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6226 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6228 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6229 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6233 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6234 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6235 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6236 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6239 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6240 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6241 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6242 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6243 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6246 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6247 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6248 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6249 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6252 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6255 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6256 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6257 strlen (token_buffer))
6258 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6259 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6264 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6265 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6269 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6272 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6273 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6274 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6275 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6281 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6282 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6287 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6288 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6289 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6290 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6291 declaration looks like this:
6304 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6309 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6310 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6315 @node Token Locations
6316 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6319 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6320 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6321 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6322 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6323 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6324 data in that variable.
6326 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6327 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6328 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6329 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6330 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6333 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6336 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6338 When you use the Bison declaration @samp{%define api.pure} to request a
6339 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6340 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6341 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6342 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6343 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6348 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6351 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6352 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6357 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6358 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6359 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6362 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6363 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6364 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6365 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6367 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6369 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6370 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6371 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6374 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6376 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6377 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6378 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6379 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6380 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6386 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6387 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6388 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6392 results in the following signatures:
6395 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6396 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6399 If @samp{%define api.pure} is added:
6402 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6403 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6407 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6410 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6411 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6412 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6415 @node Error Reporting
6416 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6417 @cindex error reporting function
6420 @cindex syntax error
6422 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6423 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6424 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6425 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6428 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6429 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6430 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6431 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6432 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6434 @findex %define parse.error
6435 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6436 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6437 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6438 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6439 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6441 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6442 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6443 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6444 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6445 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6446 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6448 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6449 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6450 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6452 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6457 yyerror (char const *s)
6461 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6466 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6467 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6468 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6469 immediately return 1.
6471 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6472 an access to the current location.
6473 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6474 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6475 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6479 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6480 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6483 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6486 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6487 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6490 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6491 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6492 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6493 @samp{%define api.pure} are pure.
6497 /* Location tracking. */
6501 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6503 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6504 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6508 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6511 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6512 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6513 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6514 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6519 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6520 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6521 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6522 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6523 message is always passed last.
6525 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6526 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6527 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6531 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6532 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6533 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6534 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6536 @node Action Features
6537 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6538 @cindex summary, action features
6539 @cindex action features summary
6541 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6542 are useful in actions.
6544 @deffn {Variable} $$
6545 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6546 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6549 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6550 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6551 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6554 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6555 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6556 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6557 Types of Values in Actions}.
6560 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6561 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6562 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6563 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6566 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6567 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6568 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6571 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6572 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6573 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6576 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6578 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6579 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6580 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6581 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6582 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6583 going to be reduced by this rule.
6585 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6586 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6587 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6590 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6593 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6594 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6597 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6598 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6602 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6603 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6604 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6605 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6606 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6607 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6610 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6611 @findex YYRECOVERING
6612 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6613 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6614 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6617 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6618 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6619 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6620 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6621 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6623 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6626 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6627 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6629 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6631 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6634 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6635 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6636 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6637 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6640 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6641 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6642 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6643 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6645 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6648 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6649 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6650 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6651 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6653 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6658 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6659 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6662 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6666 @c int first_line, last_line;
6667 @c int first_column, last_column;
6671 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6672 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6674 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6675 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6676 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6679 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6682 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6684 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6685 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6689 @node Internationalization
6690 @section Parser Internationalization
6691 @cindex internationalization
6697 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6698 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6699 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6700 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6701 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6702 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6703 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6704 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6707 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6708 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6709 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6714 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6715 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6716 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6717 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6718 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6722 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6727 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6728 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6729 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6730 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6731 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6732 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6733 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6734 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6735 Bison-generated parser.
6738 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6739 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6740 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6744 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6747 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6748 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6749 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6753 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6754 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6755 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6758 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6764 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6768 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6774 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6775 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6776 @cindex algorithm of parser
6779 @cindex parser stack
6780 @cindex stack, parser
6782 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6783 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6784 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6786 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6787 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6790 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6791 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6792 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6793 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6794 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6795 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6796 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6798 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6805 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6806 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6809 expr: expr '*' expr;
6813 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6820 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6821 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6823 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6824 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6825 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6827 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6830 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6831 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6832 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6833 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6834 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6835 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6836 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6837 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6838 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6839 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6843 @section Lookahead Tokens
6844 @cindex lookahead token
6846 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6847 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6848 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6849 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6850 token in order to decide what to do.
6852 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6853 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6854 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6855 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6856 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6857 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6858 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6861 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6862 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6863 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6882 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6883 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6884 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6885 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6886 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6888 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6889 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6890 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6891 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6892 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6893 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6898 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6899 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6900 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6901 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6904 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6906 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6907 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6908 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6910 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6911 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6917 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6923 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6924 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6926 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6927 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6928 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6929 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6932 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6933 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6934 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6935 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6936 contrast it with the other alternative.
6938 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6939 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6943 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6945 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6948 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6949 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6950 making these two inputs equivalent:
6953 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6955 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6958 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6959 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6960 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6961 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6962 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6963 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6964 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6965 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6967 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6968 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6969 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6970 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6972 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6974 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6975 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6976 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6981 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6994 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
7004 @section Operator Precedence
7005 @cindex operator precedence
7006 @cindex precedence of operators
7008 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
7009 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
7010 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
7011 shift and when to reduce.
7014 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
7015 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
7016 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
7017 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
7018 * How Precedence:: How they work.
7021 @node Why Precedence
7022 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
7024 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
7025 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
7040 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
7041 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
7042 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
7043 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
7044 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
7045 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
7046 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
7049 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
7050 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
7051 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
7052 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
7053 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
7054 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
7055 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
7056 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
7059 @cindex associativity
7060 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
7061 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
7062 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
7063 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
7064 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
7065 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
7066 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
7067 makes right-associativity.
7069 @node Using Precedence
7070 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
7076 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
7077 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
7078 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
7079 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
7080 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
7081 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
7082 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
7084 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
7085 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
7086 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
7087 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
7088 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
7089 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
7090 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
7091 what expected the grammar author.
7093 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
7094 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
7095 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
7096 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
7097 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
7099 @node Precedence Only
7100 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
7103 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
7104 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
7105 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
7106 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
7107 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
7108 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
7109 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
7111 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
7112 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
7113 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
7117 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
7120 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
7121 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
7122 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
7123 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7124 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7125 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7126 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7133 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7134 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7135 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7136 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7137 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7138 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7139 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7141 @node Precedence Examples
7142 @subsection Precedence Examples
7144 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7152 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7153 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7154 declared with @code{'-'}:
7157 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
7163 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
7164 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
7165 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
7167 @node How Precedence
7168 @subsection How Precedence Works
7170 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7171 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7172 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7173 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7174 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7175 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7177 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7178 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7179 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7180 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7181 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7182 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7183 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7186 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7187 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7189 @node Contextual Precedence
7190 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7191 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7192 @cindex unary operator precedence
7193 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7194 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7197 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7198 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7199 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7200 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7202 The Bison precedence declarations
7203 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7204 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7205 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7208 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7209 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7210 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7211 modifier's syntax is:
7214 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7218 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7219 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7220 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7221 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7222 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7224 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7225 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7226 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7236 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7244 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7249 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7250 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7251 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7252 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7254 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7255 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7256 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7257 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7259 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7260 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7261 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7262 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7263 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7264 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7266 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7267 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7271 @section Parser States
7272 @cindex finite-state machine
7273 @cindex parser state
7274 @cindex state (of parser)
7276 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7277 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7278 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7279 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7280 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7282 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7283 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7284 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7285 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7286 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7287 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7288 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7289 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7292 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7293 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7294 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7297 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7298 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7299 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7301 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7302 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7305 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7306 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7311 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7313 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7319 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7320 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7326 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7327 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7328 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7329 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7330 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7331 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7333 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7334 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7335 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7337 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7338 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7339 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7340 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7341 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7343 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7344 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7345 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7346 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7350 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7351 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7355 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7361 | sequence redirects
7371 | redirects redirect
7376 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7377 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7378 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7379 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7380 in infinitely many ways!
7382 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7383 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7384 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7385 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7387 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7398 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7406 | sequence redirects
7420 | redirects redirect
7425 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7426 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7427 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7429 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7437 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7440 | name_list ':' type
7456 | name ',' name_list
7461 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7462 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7463 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7464 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7468 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7470 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7471 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7472 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7474 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7475 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7476 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7477 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7478 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7479 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7480 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7483 @cindex canonical LR
7484 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7485 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7486 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7487 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7488 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7489 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7490 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7491 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7493 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7494 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7495 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7496 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7497 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7508 | ID BOGUS /* This rule is never used. */
7513 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7514 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7515 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7516 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7517 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7518 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7520 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7521 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7522 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7523 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7524 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7525 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7530 | name_list ':' type
7538 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7539 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7544 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7545 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7546 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7547 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7548 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
7549 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
7550 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
7552 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7553 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7554 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7555 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7557 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7558 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7561 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7562 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7563 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7564 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7567 @node LR Table Construction
7568 @subsection LR Table Construction
7569 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7572 @cindex canonical LR
7573 @findex %define lr.type
7575 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7576 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7577 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7578 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7581 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7582 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7583 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7584 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7587 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7588 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7589 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7592 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7593 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7594 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7597 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7599 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7602 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7606 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7610 %define lr.type ielr
7613 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7614 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7615 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7616 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7617 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7618 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7619 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7620 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7621 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7622 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7624 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7625 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7626 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7627 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7633 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7636 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7638 @cindex GLR with LALR
7639 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7640 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7641 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7642 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7643 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7644 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7645 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7646 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7647 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7648 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7650 @item Malformed grammars.
7652 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7653 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7654 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7655 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7656 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7661 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7662 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7663 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7664 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7665 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7666 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7667 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7668 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7669 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7673 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7676 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7677 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7678 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7679 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7680 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7681 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7682 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7683 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7684 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7685 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7686 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7687 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7690 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7691 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7692 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7694 @node Default Reductions
7695 @subsection Default Reductions
7696 @cindex default reductions
7697 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
7700 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7701 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7702 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7703 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7704 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7706 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7707 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7710 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7712 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7713 @cindex consistent states
7714 @cindex defaulted states
7715 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7716 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7717 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7718 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7719 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7720 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7721 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7722 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7723 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7724 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7725 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7727 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7728 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7729 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7730 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7731 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7732 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7733 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7734 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7735 should already be considered closed.
7737 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7739 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7740 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7741 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7742 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7743 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7744 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7745 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7746 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7747 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7751 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7752 @c sentence from being rejected.
7753 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7754 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7755 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7756 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7757 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7758 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7761 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7762 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7763 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7764 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7765 because the accept action ends the parse.
7767 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7768 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7769 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7770 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7771 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7772 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7773 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7774 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7775 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7776 split the parse instead.
7778 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7779 @code{%define lr.default-reduction} directive.
7781 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reduction @var{WHERE}}
7782 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7783 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7785 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7786 @item @code{consistent}
7787 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7790 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7791 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7796 @findex %define parse.lac
7798 @cindex lookahead correction
7800 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7801 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7802 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7803 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7804 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7805 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7806 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7807 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7808 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7810 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7811 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7812 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7813 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7814 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7816 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7817 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7818 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7819 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7821 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7822 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7824 @item @code{none} (default)
7827 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7828 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7832 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7833 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7834 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7835 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7836 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7837 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7838 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7839 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7840 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7841 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7844 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7845 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7846 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7847 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7848 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7849 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7850 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7851 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7852 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7853 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7855 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7856 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7857 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7858 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7859 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7860 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7861 language-recognition power.
7863 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7866 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7868 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7869 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7870 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7871 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7874 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7876 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7877 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7878 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7879 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7880 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7881 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7885 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7886 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7887 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7888 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7889 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7890 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7891 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7892 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7893 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7894 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7895 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7898 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7899 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7900 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7902 @node Unreachable States
7903 @subsection Unreachable States
7904 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
7905 @cindex unreachable states
7907 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7908 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7909 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7910 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7912 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7913 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7914 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7915 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7917 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state @var{VALUE}}
7918 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7919 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7922 There are a few caveats to consider:
7925 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7927 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7928 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7929 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7930 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7931 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7932 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7934 @item Other useless states.
7936 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7937 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7938 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7939 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7940 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7941 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7942 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7945 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7946 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7948 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7949 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7950 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7952 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7953 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7954 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7955 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7956 context-free languages.
7957 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7958 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7959 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7960 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7961 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7962 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7963 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7964 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7966 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7967 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7968 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7969 parser uses the same basic
7970 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7971 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7972 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7973 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7975 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7976 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7977 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7978 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7979 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7981 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7982 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7983 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7984 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7985 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7986 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7987 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7988 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7989 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7990 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7991 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7994 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7995 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7996 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7997 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7998 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7999 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
8000 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
8001 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
8002 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
8003 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
8004 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
8005 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
8007 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
8008 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
8009 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
8011 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
8012 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
8013 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
8014 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
8015 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
8016 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
8017 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
8018 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
8019 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
8020 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
8021 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
8022 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
8024 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
8027 @node Memory Management
8028 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
8029 @cindex memory exhaustion
8030 @cindex memory management
8031 @cindex stack overflow
8032 @cindex parser stack overflow
8033 @cindex overflow of parser stack
8035 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
8036 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
8037 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
8039 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
8040 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
8041 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
8044 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
8045 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
8046 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
8047 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
8049 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
8050 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
8051 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
8052 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
8053 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
8054 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
8056 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
8057 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
8058 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
8061 @cindex default stack limit
8062 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
8066 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
8067 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
8068 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
8069 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
8070 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
8072 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
8074 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
8075 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
8076 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
8077 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
8078 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
8079 non-trivial copy constructors.
8080 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
8083 @node Error Recovery
8084 @chapter Error Recovery
8085 @cindex error recovery
8086 @cindex recovery from errors
8088 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
8089 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
8090 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
8093 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
8094 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
8095 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
8096 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
8097 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
8098 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
8099 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
8102 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
8103 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
8104 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
8105 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
8106 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
8107 in the current context, the parse can continue.
8119 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8120 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8122 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8123 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8124 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8125 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8126 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8127 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8128 applicable in the ordinary way.
8130 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8131 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8132 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8133 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8134 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8135 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8136 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8137 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8138 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8139 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8140 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8141 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8143 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8144 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8145 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8148 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8151 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8152 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8153 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8154 spurious error message:
8164 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8165 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8166 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8167 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8168 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8169 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8170 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8173 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8174 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8175 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8176 error messages resume.
8178 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8179 as any other rules can.
8182 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8183 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8184 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8185 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8188 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8189 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8190 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8192 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8194 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8195 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8196 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8197 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8198 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8200 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8201 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8202 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8203 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8206 @node Context Dependency
8207 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8209 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8210 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8211 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8212 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8216 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8217 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8218 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8219 error recovery rules must be written.
8222 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8223 neither clean nor robust.)
8225 @node Semantic Tokens
8226 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8228 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8229 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8235 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8236 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8237 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8239 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8240 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8241 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8242 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8243 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8245 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8246 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8247 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8248 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8249 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8250 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8251 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8253 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8254 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8255 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8256 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8260 typedef int foo, bar;
8264 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8265 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8271 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8272 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8274 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8275 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8276 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8277 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8278 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8283 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8284 | declarator maybeasm
8290 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8291 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8297 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8298 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8299 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8301 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8302 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8303 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8304 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8305 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8306 the syntactic context.
8308 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8309 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8310 @cindex lexical tie-in
8312 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8313 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8316 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8317 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8318 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8319 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8320 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8327 void yyerror (char const *);
8336 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8337 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8338 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8352 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8353 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8354 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8356 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8357 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8358 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8361 @node Tie-in Recovery
8362 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8364 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8365 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8367 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8368 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8369 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8370 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8375 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8377 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8381 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8382 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8383 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8384 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8385 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8387 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8389 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8390 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8391 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8397 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8403 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8404 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8405 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8406 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8408 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8409 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8410 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8411 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8412 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8413 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8416 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8419 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8421 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8422 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8423 chapter explains how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8424 automaton, and how to enable and understand the parser run-time traces.
8427 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8428 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8429 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8433 @section Understanding Your Parser
8435 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8436 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8437 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8438 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8439 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8441 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8442 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8443 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8444 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8445 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8446 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8447 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8449 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8467 @command{bison} reports:
8470 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8471 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8472 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8473 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8474 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8477 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8478 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8479 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8480 interpretation is the same.
8483 @cindex token, useless
8484 @cindex useless token
8485 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8486 @cindex useless nonterminal
8487 @cindex rule, useless
8488 @cindex useless rule
8489 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8490 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8491 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8492 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8495 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8498 Terminals unused in grammar
8501 Rules useless in grammar
8506 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8509 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8510 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8511 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8512 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8516 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8531 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8535 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8548 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8553 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8559 @cindex pointed rule
8560 @cindex rule, pointed
8561 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8562 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8563 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8564 the location of the input cursor.
8569 0 $accept: . exp $end
8571 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8576 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8577 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8578 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8579 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8580 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8581 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8582 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8583 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8585 @cindex core, item set
8586 @cindex item set core
8587 @cindex kernel, item set
8588 @cindex item set core
8589 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8590 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8591 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8592 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8593 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8594 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8599 0 $accept: . exp $end
8600 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8606 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8612 In the state 1@dots{}
8619 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8623 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8624 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8625 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8626 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8631 0 $accept: exp . $end
8632 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8637 $end shift, and go to state 3
8638 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8639 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8640 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8641 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8645 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8646 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8647 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8648 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8649 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8652 @cindex accepting state
8653 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8659 0 $accept: exp $end .
8665 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8666 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8668 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8674 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8676 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8683 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8685 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8692 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8694 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8701 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8703 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8708 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8714 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8720 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8721 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8723 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8724 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8727 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8728 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8729 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8730 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8731 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8732 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8733 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8734 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8736 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8737 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8738 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8741 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8742 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8743 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8744 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8745 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8746 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8747 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8748 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8749 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8750 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8751 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8752 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8757 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8758 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8763 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8764 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8766 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8767 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8770 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8771 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8772 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8773 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8774 conflicts in the report:
8777 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8778 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8779 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8783 The remaining states are similar:
8789 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8795 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8796 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8798 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8799 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8805 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8811 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8813 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8814 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8820 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8826 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8827 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8828 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8829 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8831 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8832 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8833 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8834 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8835 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8840 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8841 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8842 @samp{*}, but also because the
8843 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8845 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
8848 @section Visualizing Your Parser
8851 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
8852 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
8853 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
8854 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
8855 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
8856 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
8857 to help them understand LR parsers.
8859 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
8860 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
8861 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
8862 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
8863 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}.
8865 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8876 The graphical output is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is
8877 easier understood by making direct comparisons between them. See
8878 @ref{Debugging, , Debugging Your Parser} for a detailled analysis of the
8881 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
8883 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
8884 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
8885 about transitions, for examples
8887 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
8888 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
8889 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
8894 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
8897 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
8899 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
8900 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
8908 ";" shift, and go to state 6
8912 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8914 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
8916 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
8918 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
8919 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
8920 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
8921 action for the given state, there is no such label.
8923 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
8930 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
8931 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
8934 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8936 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
8938 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
8939 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
8940 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
8941 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
8942 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
8944 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation state. It
8945 is shown as a blue diamond, labelled "Acc".
8947 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
8949 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
8950 the name of the rule being jumped to.
8952 @c ================================================= Tracing
8955 @section Tracing Your Parser
8958 @cindex tracing the parser
8960 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
8961 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
8964 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
8965 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
8966 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
8969 @node Enabling Traces
8970 @subsection Enabling Traces
8971 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8974 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8976 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8977 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8978 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8979 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8982 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
8983 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
8984 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
8985 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
8986 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
8988 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
8989 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
8990 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8991 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
8992 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
8994 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8996 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8997 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
8998 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
9000 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
9001 @findex %define parse.trace
9002 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
9003 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
9004 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
9005 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
9006 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
9009 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
9013 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
9014 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
9015 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
9016 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
9017 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
9018 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
9020 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
9021 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
9022 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
9023 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
9025 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
9026 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
9027 messages tell you these things:
9031 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
9034 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
9035 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
9038 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
9039 of the state stack afterward.
9042 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
9043 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
9044 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
9045 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
9046 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
9047 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
9048 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
9049 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
9050 grammar are to blame.
9052 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
9053 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
9054 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
9055 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
9056 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
9059 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
9061 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
9062 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
9063 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
9064 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
9065 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
9066 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
9068 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
9069 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
9070 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
9073 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
9075 /* Generate the parser description file. */
9077 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
9080 /* Formatting semantic values. */
9081 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
9082 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
9083 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
9086 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
9087 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
9088 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
9089 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
9090 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
9091 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
9093 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
9094 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
9095 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
9096 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
9097 printer will be used for them.
9099 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
9100 are sent onto standard error.
9103 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
9106 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
9107 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9113 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
9114 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
9115 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
9116 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
9118 Then the parser calls the scanner.
9120 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9121 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9126 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9127 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9128 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9132 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9133 Shifting token '(' ()
9135 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9136 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9138 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9139 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9140 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9146 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9147 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting non-terminal
9148 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9151 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9152 Shifting token '-' ()
9154 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9155 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9157 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9158 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9159 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9160 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9162 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9163 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9164 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9166 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9167 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9173 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9174 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9177 Next token is token ')' ()
9178 Shifting token ')' ()
9180 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9181 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9183 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9185 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9191 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9195 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9196 Shifting token '\n' ()
9198 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9199 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9202 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9205 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9208 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9213 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9214 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9215 completion of the parsing.
9218 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9219 Shifting token $end ()
9222 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9223 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9227 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9228 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9231 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9232 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9233 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9235 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9237 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9238 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9239 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9241 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9244 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9245 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9249 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9250 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9251 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9254 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9257 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9260 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9261 else if (type == NUM)
9262 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9266 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9269 @chapter Invoking Bison
9270 @cindex invoking Bison
9271 @cindex Bison invocation
9272 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9274 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9280 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9281 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9282 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9283 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9284 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9285 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9286 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9287 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9288 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9289 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9290 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9295 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9298 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9301 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9304 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9306 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9307 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9308 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9311 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9312 in alphabetical order by short options.
9313 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9314 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9318 @section Bison Options
9320 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9321 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9322 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9323 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9324 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9327 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9328 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9331 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
9337 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9341 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9343 @item --print-localedir
9344 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9346 @item --print-datadir
9347 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9351 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9352 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9353 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9354 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9355 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9356 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9357 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9358 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9359 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9360 for compatibility with POSIX:
9367 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9368 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9369 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9370 this option is specified.
9372 @item -W [@var{category}]
9373 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9374 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9377 @item midrule-values
9378 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9380 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9383 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9386 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9387 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9390 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9393 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9394 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9395 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9398 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9402 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9403 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9404 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9405 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9406 no effect on the conflict report.
9409 Deprecated constructs whose support will be removed in future versions of
9413 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9415 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9416 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9422 Turn off all the warnings.
9424 See @option{-Werror}, below.
9427 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9428 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9429 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9431 @item -Werror[=@var{category}]
9432 @itemx -Wno-error[=@var{category}]
9433 Enable warnings falling in @var{category}, and treat them as errors. If no
9434 @var{category} is given, it defaults to making all enabled warnings into errors.
9436 @var{category} is the same as for @option{--warnings}, with the exception that
9437 it may not be prefixed with @samp{no-} (see above).
9439 Prefixed with @samp{no}, it deactivates the error treatment for this
9440 @var{category}. However, the warning itself won't be disabled, or enabled, by
9443 Note that the precedence of the @samp{=} and @samp{,} operators is such that
9444 the following commands are @emph{not} equivalent, as the first will not treat
9445 S/R conflicts as errors.
9448 $ bison -Werror=yacc,conflicts-sr input.y
9449 $ bison -Werror=yacc,error=conflicts-sr input.y
9459 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9460 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9461 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9463 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9464 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9465 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9466 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9467 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9468 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9469 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9473 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9476 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9477 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9478 definition for @var{name}.
9480 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9481 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9482 definitions for @var{name}.
9484 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9485 definitions for @var{name}.
9488 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9489 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9490 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9492 @item -L @var{language}
9493 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9494 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9495 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9496 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9497 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9499 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
9503 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9505 @item -p @var{prefix}
9506 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9507 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
9508 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
9509 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
9513 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9514 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9515 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9516 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9517 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9518 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9521 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9522 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9523 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9525 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9526 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9527 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9528 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9530 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9531 file in the Bison installation directory.
9532 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9533 current working directory.
9534 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9537 @itemx --token-table
9538 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9545 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9546 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9547 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9548 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9551 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9552 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9553 with other short options.
9555 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9556 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9557 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9558 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9560 @item -r @var{things}
9561 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9562 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9563 separated list of @var{things} among:
9567 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9571 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9572 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9575 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9576 each rule's lookahead set.
9579 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
9580 precedence and associativity directives.
9583 Enable all the items.
9586 Do not generate the report.
9589 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9590 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9594 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9595 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9596 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9599 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9600 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9602 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9603 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9605 @item -g [@var{file}]
9606 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9607 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9608 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9609 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9610 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9611 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9614 @item -x [@var{file}]
9615 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9616 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9617 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9618 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9620 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9621 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9624 @node Option Cross Key
9625 @section Option Cross Key
9627 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9628 the corresponding short option and directive.
9630 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9631 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9632 @include cross-options.texi
9636 @section Yacc Library
9638 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9639 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9640 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9641 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9642 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9643 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9644 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9646 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9647 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9650 int yyerror (char const *);
9653 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9654 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9655 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9661 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9663 @node Other Languages
9664 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9667 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9668 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9672 @section C++ Parsers
9675 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9676 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9677 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9678 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9679 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9680 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9683 @node C++ Bison Interface
9684 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9685 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9689 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9690 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9691 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9692 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9694 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9696 @findex %define api.namespace
9697 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
9698 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
9699 in the following files:
9704 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
9705 location tracking when enabled. These files are not generated if the
9706 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++
9710 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9713 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9714 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9715 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9716 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9717 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9719 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9720 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9721 @samp{%defines} directive.
9724 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9725 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9727 @node C++ Semantic Values
9728 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9729 @c - No objects in unions
9731 @c - Printer and destructor
9733 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
9734 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
9735 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
9736 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
9739 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
9740 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
9744 @subsubsection C++ Unions
9746 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9747 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9748 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9751 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9752 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9753 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9755 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9756 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9757 to such objects are allowed.
9760 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9761 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9762 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9766 @subsubsection C++ Variants
9768 Starting with version 2.6, Bison provides a @emph{variant} based
9769 implementation of semantic values for C++. This alleviates all the
9770 limitations reported in the previous section, and in particular, object
9771 types can be used without pointers.
9773 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
9774 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
9775 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
9776 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
9778 For instance, instead of
9786 %token <ival> NUMBER;
9787 %token <sval> STRING;
9794 %token <int> NUMBER;
9795 %token <std::string> STRING;
9798 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
9799 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
9802 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
9803 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
9804 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
9806 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
9807 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
9808 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
9809 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
9810 eventually, destroyed.
9812 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
9813 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
9814 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
9817 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
9818 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
9822 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
9823 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
9824 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
9825 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
9826 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
9827 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
9828 that would be duplicating the information.
9830 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
9831 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
9832 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
9833 (the current implementation of) variants:
9836 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
9837 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
9838 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
9839 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
9840 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
9841 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
9844 Our implementation is not conforming with strict aliasing rules. Alias
9845 analysis is a technique used in optimizing compilers to detect when two
9846 pointers are disjoint (they cannot ``meet''). Our implementation breaks
9847 some of the rules that G++ 4.4 uses in its alias analysis, so @emph{strict
9848 alias analysis must be disabled}. Use the option
9849 @option{-fno-strict-aliasing} to compile the generated parser.
9852 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
9855 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
9856 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
9858 @node C++ Location Values
9859 @subsection C++ Location Values
9863 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9865 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9866 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
9868 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
9869 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9870 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
9871 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
9872 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
9875 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
9876 genuine code only the latter is used.
9879 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
9880 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
9881 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
9885 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
9887 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9888 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
9889 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
9893 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9894 Reset the position to the given values.
9897 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
9898 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9899 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9900 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9901 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9904 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
9905 The line, starting at 1.
9908 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9909 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9912 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
9913 The column, starting at 1.
9916 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9917 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9920 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
9921 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
9922 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
9923 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
9924 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9927 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
9928 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
9929 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
9932 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9933 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9934 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9935 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9939 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
9941 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
9942 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9945 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
9946 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
9947 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9950 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9951 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
9954 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
9955 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
9956 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9959 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9960 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9961 Advance the @code{end} position.
9964 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
9965 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
9966 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
9967 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9970 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9971 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9974 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
9975 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
9976 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
9980 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
9981 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
9982 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
9985 @node User Defined Location Type
9986 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
9987 @findex %define api.location.type
9989 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
9990 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
9993 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
9996 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
9999 it must be copyable;
10002 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
10003 parser basically runs
10005 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
10006 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
10009 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
10012 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
10013 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
10016 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
10017 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
10022 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
10023 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
10024 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
10025 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
10030 %define namespace "master::"
10034 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
10035 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
10038 %define api.location.type "master::location"
10039 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
10042 @node C++ Parser Interface
10043 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
10044 @c - define parser_class_name
10046 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10048 @c - Reporting errors
10050 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
10051 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
10052 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
10053 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
10054 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
10055 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
10056 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
10057 additional argument for its constructor.
10059 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
10060 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
10061 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
10064 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
10065 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
10066 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
10067 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
10068 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
10069 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
10072 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
10073 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
10074 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
10075 equivalent with first
10076 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
10077 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
10078 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
10079 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
10080 function invoked from the user action.
10083 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10084 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
10085 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
10088 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10089 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
10090 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
10093 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
10094 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
10097 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
10098 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
10099 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
10102 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
10103 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
10104 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10108 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
10109 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
10110 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10111 or nonzero, full tracing.
10114 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10115 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
10116 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
10117 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
10118 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
10123 @node C++ Scanner Interface
10124 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
10125 @c - prefix for yylex.
10126 @c - Pure interface to yylex
10129 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
10130 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
10131 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
10132 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
10135 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
10136 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
10139 @node Split Symbols
10140 @subsubsection Split Symbols
10142 Therefore the interface is as follows.
10144 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10145 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10146 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
10147 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
10148 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10151 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
10152 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
10154 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
10158 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
10159 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10162 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
10163 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10167 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
10168 initialized. So the code would look like:
10172 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
10173 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10176 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
10177 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10186 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
10187 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10190 yylval.build(yytext);
10191 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10196 @node Complete Symbols
10197 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
10199 If you specified both @code{%define variant} and
10200 @code{%define api.token.constructor},
10201 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
10202 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
10203 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
10204 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
10206 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10207 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
10208 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
10209 the @var{location}.
10212 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
10213 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
10214 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
10215 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
10217 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
10219 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10220 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
10221 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
10222 including the @code{api.token.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
10223 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
10224 also pass the @var{location}.
10227 For instance, given the following declarations:
10230 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10231 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
10232 %token <int> INTEGER;
10237 Bison generates the following functions:
10240 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
10241 const location_type& l);
10242 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
10243 const location_type& loc);
10244 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
10248 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
10251 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
10252 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10253 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
10256 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
10257 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
10259 @node A Complete C++ Example
10260 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
10262 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10263 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10264 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10265 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10266 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10267 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10268 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
10269 actually easier to interface with.
10272 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10273 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10274 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10275 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10276 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10279 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10280 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10282 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10283 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10284 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10285 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10286 of valid input follows.
10290 seven := one + two * three
10294 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10295 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10297 @c - A place to store error messages
10298 @c - A place for the result
10300 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
10301 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
10302 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
10303 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
10304 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
10305 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
10306 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
10308 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
10309 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
10310 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
10313 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10315 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10316 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10319 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10324 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
10325 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
10326 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
10327 factor both as follows.
10329 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10331 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
10333 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
10334 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
10339 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
10342 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10344 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
10345 class calcxx_driver
10349 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
10351 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
10357 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
10358 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
10360 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10362 // Handling the scanner.
10363 void scan_begin ();
10365 bool trace_scanning;
10369 Similarly for the parser itself.
10371 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10373 // Run the parser on file F.
10374 // Return 0 on success.
10375 int parse (const std::string& f);
10376 // The name of the file being parsed.
10377 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
10379 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
10380 bool trace_parsing;
10384 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
10385 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
10386 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
10387 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
10389 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10392 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
10393 void error (const std::string& m);
10395 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10398 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
10399 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
10400 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
10401 messages and set error state.
10403 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
10405 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10406 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
10408 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
10409 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
10411 variables["one"] = 1;
10412 variables["two"] = 2;
10415 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
10420 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
10424 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
10425 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
10426 int res = parser.parse ();
10432 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
10434 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
10438 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
10440 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
10444 @node Calc++ Parser
10445 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
10447 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
10448 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
10449 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
10450 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
10453 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10455 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
10456 %require "@value{VERSION}"
10458 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
10462 @findex %define api.token.constructor
10463 @findex %define variant
10464 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
10465 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
10466 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
10467 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{api.token.constructor}.
10469 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10471 %define api.token.constructor
10472 %define parse.assert
10477 @findex %code requires
10478 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
10479 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
10480 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
10481 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
10482 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
10483 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
10484 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
10486 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10491 class calcxx_driver;
10496 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
10497 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
10500 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10502 // The parsing context.
10503 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10507 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
10508 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
10509 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
10512 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10517 // Initialize the initial location.
10518 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
10523 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
10524 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
10527 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10529 %define parse.trace
10530 %define parse.error verbose
10535 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
10536 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
10538 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10542 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10548 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
10549 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
10550 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
10551 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
10552 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}).
10554 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10556 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10558 END 0 "end of file"
10570 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
10571 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
10574 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10576 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
10577 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
10582 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
10583 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
10584 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
10585 @code{operator<<} (@pxref{Printer Decl, , Printing Semantic Values}).
10587 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10589 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
10593 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
10594 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
10596 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10600 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
10603 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
10604 | assignments assignment @{@};
10607 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
10612 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
10613 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
10614 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
10615 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
10616 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
10617 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
10618 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
10623 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
10626 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10629 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
10630 const std::string& m)
10632 driver.error (l, m);
10636 @node Calc++ Scanner
10637 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
10639 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
10640 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
10642 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10644 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
10646 # include <climits>
10647 # include <cstdlib>
10649 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10650 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10652 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
10653 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
10654 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
10655 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
10657 # define yywrap() 1
10659 // The location of the current token.
10660 static yy::location loc;
10665 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
10666 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
10667 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
10668 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
10670 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10672 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
10676 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
10678 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10680 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
10686 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
10687 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
10688 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
10689 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
10690 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
10691 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
10692 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
10694 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10698 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
10699 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
10705 // Code run each time yylex is called.
10709 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
10710 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
10714 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
10716 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10718 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
10719 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
10720 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
10721 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
10722 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
10723 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
10724 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
10729 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
10730 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
10731 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
10732 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
10735 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10736 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
10737 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
10742 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
10743 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
10745 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10749 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
10751 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
10752 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
10754 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
10756 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
10757 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10764 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
10771 @node Calc++ Top Level
10772 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
10774 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
10776 @comment file: calc++.cc
10778 #include <iostream>
10779 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10783 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10786 calcxx_driver driver;
10787 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
10788 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
10789 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10790 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
10791 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10792 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
10793 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10802 @section Java Parsers
10805 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10806 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10807 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10808 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10809 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10810 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10811 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10812 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10815 @node Java Bison Interface
10816 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10817 @c - %language "Java"
10819 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10820 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10822 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10823 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10825 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10826 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10827 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10828 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10829 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10830 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10831 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10832 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10833 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10834 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10836 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10838 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10839 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10840 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10841 and @samp{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
10844 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10845 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10847 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10848 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10850 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10851 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10853 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10854 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
10855 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
10857 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10858 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10859 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
10861 if needed. Also, in the future the
10862 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
10863 access the token names and codes.
10865 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
10866 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
10867 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
10868 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
10871 @node Java Semantic Values
10872 @subsection Java Semantic Values
10873 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
10875 @c - Printer and destructor
10877 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
10878 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
10879 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
10882 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
10883 %type <Integer> number
10886 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
10887 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
10888 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
10889 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define stype}
10890 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
10893 %define stype "ASTNode"
10897 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
10898 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
10900 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10901 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
10902 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
10903 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
10904 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
10905 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
10907 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
10908 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
10909 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
10911 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
10912 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
10913 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
10916 @node Java Location Values
10917 @subsection Java Location Values
10919 @c - class Position
10920 @c - class Location
10922 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
10923 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
10924 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
10925 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10926 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
10927 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
10928 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
10930 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
10931 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
10932 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
10933 be supplied by the user.
10936 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10937 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10938 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10941 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10942 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10945 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10946 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10949 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10950 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10951 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10952 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10956 @node Java Parser Interface
10957 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10958 @c - define parser_class_name
10960 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10962 @c - Reporting errors
10964 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10965 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10966 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10967 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10968 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10970 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10971 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10972 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10973 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10974 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10975 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10976 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
10977 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
10979 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10980 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10981 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10982 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
10984 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10985 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10986 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10987 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10988 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10989 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10991 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10992 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10993 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10994 which initialize them automatically.
10996 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10997 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10998 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
10999 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
11001 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11002 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11003 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11006 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11007 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
11008 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
11011 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
11012 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
11013 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
11015 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11016 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11017 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11020 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
11021 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
11022 @code{false} otherwise.
11025 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
11026 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
11027 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
11028 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
11029 verbose error messages.
11032 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11033 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
11034 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11035 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11036 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11037 available only if location tracking is active.
11040 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
11041 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
11042 from a syntax error.
11043 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11046 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
11047 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
11048 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
11052 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
11053 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
11054 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
11055 or nonzero, full tracing.
11058 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
11059 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
11060 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
11064 @node Java Scanner Interface
11065 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
11068 @c - Lexer interface
11070 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
11071 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
11072 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
11073 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
11074 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
11077 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
11078 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
11079 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
11080 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
11083 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
11084 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
11085 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
11086 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
11089 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
11091 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11092 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
11093 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
11094 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
11097 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
11098 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
11099 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
11102 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11103 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11106 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
11107 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
11108 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
11109 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
11110 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
11112 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
11113 "@var{class-name}".}
11116 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
11117 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
11119 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define stype
11120 "@var{class-name}".}
11124 @node Java Action Features
11125 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
11127 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
11128 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
11130 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
11131 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
11134 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11135 This may not be assigned to.
11136 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11139 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
11140 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
11141 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11145 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
11146 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
11147 @samp{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
11148 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
11149 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
11150 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11153 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
11154 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
11155 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
11156 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
11158 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11162 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11163 This may not be assigned to.
11164 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11168 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
11169 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11172 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
11173 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
11174 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11177 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
11178 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
11179 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11182 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
11183 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
11184 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11187 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
11188 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
11189 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
11191 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11194 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11195 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11196 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11197 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11198 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11199 available only if location tracking is active.
11203 @node Java Differences
11204 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11206 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
11207 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
11208 section summarizes these differences.
11212 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
11213 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
11214 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
11215 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
11216 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
11217 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
11218 @xref{Java Action Features}.
11220 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
11221 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
11222 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
11223 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
11224 corresponds to these C macros.}.
11227 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
11228 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
11229 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
11230 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
11231 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
11232 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
11233 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
11234 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
11235 @ref{Java Action Features}.
11238 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
11240 @item @code{%code imports}
11241 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
11242 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
11243 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
11245 @item unqualified @code{%code}
11246 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
11248 @item @code{%code lexer}
11249 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
11250 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
11251 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
11255 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
11256 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
11257 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
11259 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
11260 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
11265 @node Java Declarations Summary
11266 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
11268 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
11269 meaning when used in a Java parser.
11271 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
11272 Generate a Java class for the parser.
11275 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11276 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
11277 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
11278 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
11279 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11282 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11283 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
11284 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
11285 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11288 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11289 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
11290 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
11291 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11294 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
11295 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
11296 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11299 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
11300 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
11301 a Java @emph{type}.
11302 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11305 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11306 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
11307 @xref{Java Differences}.
11310 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11311 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
11312 @xref{Java Differences}.
11315 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11316 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
11317 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11320 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11321 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
11322 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11325 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
11326 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
11327 @emph{outside} the parser class.
11328 @xref{Java Differences}.
11331 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
11332 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
11333 @xref{Java Differences}.
11336 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
11337 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
11338 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11341 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
11342 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
11343 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11346 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
11347 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
11348 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11351 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
11352 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
11353 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11356 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
11357 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
11359 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11362 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11363 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
11364 constructor. Default is none.
11365 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11368 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11369 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
11370 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11371 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11374 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
11375 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
11376 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
11377 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
11378 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
11379 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11382 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
11383 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
11384 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11387 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
11388 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
11389 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
11390 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11393 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
11394 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
11395 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
11396 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
11397 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11400 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
11401 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
11402 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11405 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
11406 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
11407 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11410 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
11411 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
11412 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11415 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11416 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
11417 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
11418 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11422 @c ================================================= FAQ
11425 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
11426 @cindex frequently asked questions
11429 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
11433 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
11434 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
11435 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
11436 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
11437 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
11438 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
11439 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
11440 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
11441 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
11442 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
11443 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
11444 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
11447 @node Memory Exhausted
11448 @section Memory Exhausted
11451 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
11452 message. What can I do?
11455 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11458 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
11459 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
11461 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
11462 following typical questions:
11465 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
11466 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
11467 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
11474 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
11475 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
11476 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
11479 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
11480 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
11481 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
11482 demonstration, consider the following source file,
11483 @file{first-line.l}:
11489 #include <stdlib.h>
11493 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
11497 yyparse (char const *file)
11499 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
11503 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11507 /* One token only. */
11509 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
11512 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11530 If the file @file{input} contains
11538 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
11541 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
11542 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
11543 $ @kbd{./first-line}
11548 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
11549 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
11550 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
11551 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
11552 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
11553 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
11554 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
11555 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
11558 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
11559 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
11560 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
11561 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
11563 @node Strings are Destroyed
11564 @section Strings are Destroyed
11567 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
11568 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
11569 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
11572 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
11573 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
11574 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
11580 char *yylval = NULL;
11585 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
11593 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
11594 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
11595 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
11596 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
11602 If you compile and run this code, you get:
11605 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11606 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11607 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11613 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
11614 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
11615 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
11616 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
11617 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
11618 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
11621 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11622 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11623 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11628 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
11629 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
11632 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
11633 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
11636 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
11637 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
11638 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
11639 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
11640 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
11641 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
11642 execute simple instructions one after the others.
11644 @cindex abstract syntax tree
11646 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
11647 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
11648 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
11649 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
11650 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
11651 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
11654 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
11655 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
11658 @node Multiple start-symbols
11659 @section Multiple start-symbols
11662 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
11663 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
11664 multiple entry points.
11667 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
11668 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
11669 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
11670 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
11674 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
11681 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
11682 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
11684 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
11685 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
11686 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
11687 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
11688 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
11689 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
11690 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
11691 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
11694 /* @r{Prologue.} */
11699 int t = start_token;
11704 /* @r{The rules.} */
11708 @node Secure? Conform?
11709 @section Secure? Conform?
11712 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
11715 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
11716 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
11717 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
11718 please send us a bug report.
11720 @node I can't build Bison
11721 @section I can't build Bison
11724 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
11725 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
11729 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
11730 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
11731 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
11732 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
11733 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
11734 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
11735 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
11738 @node Where can I find help?
11739 @section Where can I find help?
11742 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
11745 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
11746 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
11747 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
11748 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
11749 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
11750 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
11751 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
11752 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
11756 @section Bug Reports
11759 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
11762 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
11763 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
11764 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
11765 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
11766 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
11768 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
11769 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
11770 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
11771 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
11772 easier it will be to fix the bug.
11774 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
11775 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
11776 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
11777 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
11778 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
11779 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
11781 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
11782 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
11784 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
11786 @node More Languages
11787 @section More Languages
11790 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
11791 favorite language here}?
11794 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
11795 languages; contributions are welcome.
11798 @section Beta Testing
11801 What is involved in being a beta tester?
11804 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
11805 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
11806 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
11807 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
11808 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
11809 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
11810 essentially halted.
11812 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
11813 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
11814 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
11815 systems are especially welcome.
11817 @node Mailing Lists
11818 @section Mailing Lists
11821 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
11824 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
11826 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11828 @node Table of Symbols
11829 @appendix Bison Symbols
11830 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11831 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11833 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11834 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11835 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11838 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11839 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11840 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11843 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11844 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11848 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11849 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11853 @deffn {Variable} $$
11854 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11858 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11859 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11860 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
11863 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
11864 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11868 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
11869 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11873 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
11874 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
11875 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
11876 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
11879 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
11880 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
11881 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
11882 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
11883 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
11887 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
11888 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
11889 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
11890 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
11891 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
11892 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
11893 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
11895 This feature is experimental.
11896 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11900 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
11901 Comment delimiters, as in C.
11904 @deffn {Delimiter} :
11905 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
11909 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
11910 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11913 @deffn {Delimiter} |
11914 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
11915 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11918 @deffn {Directive} <*>
11919 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
11922 This feature is experimental.
11923 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11926 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11929 @deffn {Directive} <>
11930 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
11933 This feature is experimental.
11934 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11937 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11940 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
11941 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
11942 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
11943 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
11946 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
11947 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
11948 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
11949 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
11950 @xref{%code Summary}.
11953 @deffn {Directive} %debug
11954 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11958 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
11959 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11960 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11965 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
11966 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
11967 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
11968 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
11971 @deffn {Directive} %defines
11972 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
11973 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11976 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
11977 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
11978 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11981 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
11982 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
11983 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11986 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
11987 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
11988 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
11992 @deffn {Symbol} $end
11993 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11994 used in the grammar.
11997 @deffn {Symbol} error
11998 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11999 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
12000 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
12001 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
12002 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
12003 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
12004 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
12005 @xref{Error Recovery}.
12008 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
12009 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
12010 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12013 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12014 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
12018 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
12019 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
12020 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12023 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
12024 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
12027 @deffn {Directive} %language
12028 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
12029 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12032 @deffn {Directive} %left
12033 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
12034 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12037 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12038 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
12039 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
12043 @deffn {Directive} %merge
12044 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
12045 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
12046 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
12047 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12050 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12051 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
12052 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
12054 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
12055 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
12056 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
12058 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
12059 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
12060 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
12061 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
12062 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
12063 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
12064 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
12065 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
12070 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
12071 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12072 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12077 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
12078 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
12079 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12082 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
12083 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
12084 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12087 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
12088 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
12089 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12092 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12093 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
12094 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
12095 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12098 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12099 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
12100 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12103 @deffn {Directive} %prec
12104 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
12105 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
12108 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
12109 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
12110 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12113 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
12114 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
12115 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
12116 unreasonable usage.
12119 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
12120 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
12121 Require a Version of Bison}.
12124 @deffn {Directive} %right
12125 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
12126 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12129 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
12130 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
12131 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12134 @deffn {Directive} %start
12135 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
12139 @deffn {Directive} %token
12140 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
12141 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
12144 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
12145 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
12146 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12149 @deffn {Directive} %type
12150 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
12151 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
12154 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
12155 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
12156 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
12160 @deffn {Directive} %union
12161 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
12162 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
12165 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
12166 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
12167 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
12168 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
12169 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12171 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
12175 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
12176 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
12177 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
12178 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12180 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
12184 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
12185 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
12186 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12189 @deffn {Variable} yychar
12190 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
12191 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
12192 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
12193 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12196 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
12197 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
12198 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12201 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
12202 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
12203 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12206 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
12207 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
12208 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
12209 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12212 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
12213 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
12214 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12217 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
12218 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
12219 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
12220 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
12221 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
12222 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12224 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
12228 @deffn {Function} yyerror
12229 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
12230 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12233 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
12234 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
12235 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
12236 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
12237 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
12238 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
12239 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12242 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
12243 Macro used to output run-time traces.
12244 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
12247 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
12248 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
12249 @xref{Memory Management}.
12252 @deffn {Function} yylex
12253 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
12254 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
12258 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
12259 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
12260 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
12261 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
12262 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
12265 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
12266 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
12267 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12268 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12270 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
12272 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
12273 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
12274 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
12277 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
12278 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
12279 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
12282 @deffn {Variable} yylval
12283 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
12284 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12285 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12287 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
12288 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
12289 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
12292 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
12293 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
12297 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
12298 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
12299 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
12300 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
12301 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12304 @deffn {Function} yyparse
12305 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
12306 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12309 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
12310 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
12311 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
12312 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
12315 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
12316 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12317 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
12318 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
12319 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
12320 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12321 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12324 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
12325 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12326 call this function to create a new parser.
12327 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
12328 @code{yypstate_new}}.
12329 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12330 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12333 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
12334 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12335 parse the rest of the input stream.
12336 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
12337 @code{yypull_parse}}.
12338 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12339 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12342 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
12343 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12344 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
12345 @code{yypush_parse}}.
12346 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12347 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12350 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
12351 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
12352 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
12353 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12356 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
12357 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
12358 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
12359 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
12360 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
12361 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
12362 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
12364 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
12365 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
12366 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
12367 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
12368 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
12369 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
12370 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
12373 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
12374 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
12375 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
12383 @item Accepting state
12384 A state whose only action is the accept action.
12385 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
12386 @xref{Understanding,,}.
12388 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
12389 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
12390 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
12391 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
12392 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12394 @item Consistent state
12395 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12397 @item Context-free grammars
12398 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
12399 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
12400 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
12401 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
12404 @item Default reduction
12405 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
12406 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
12407 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
12408 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
12411 @item Defaulted state
12412 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12414 @item Dynamic allocation
12415 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
12416 compile time or on entry to a function.
12419 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
12420 character string of length zero.
12422 @item Finite-state stack machine
12423 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
12424 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
12425 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
12426 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
12427 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
12428 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12430 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
12431 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
12432 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
12433 deterministic parsing
12434 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
12435 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
12436 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
12440 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
12441 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
12442 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12444 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
12445 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
12446 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
12447 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
12448 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
12449 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
12450 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
12451 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
12452 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
12453 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
12455 @item Infix operator
12456 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
12457 performs some operation.
12460 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
12462 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
12463 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
12464 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
12465 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
12466 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
12467 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
12468 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
12470 @item Language construct
12471 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
12472 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
12473 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12475 @item Left associativity
12476 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
12477 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
12478 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
12480 @item Left recursion
12481 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
12482 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12485 @item Left-to-right parsing
12486 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
12487 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12489 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
12490 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
12491 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
12493 @item Lexical tie-in
12494 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
12495 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
12497 @item Literal string token
12498 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
12500 @item Lookahead token
12501 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
12505 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
12506 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
12507 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
12510 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
12511 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
12513 @item Nonterminal symbol
12514 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
12515 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
12516 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
12519 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
12520 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
12523 @item Postfix operator
12524 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
12525 performs some operation.
12528 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
12529 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
12533 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
12534 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
12535 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
12537 @item Reverse polish notation
12538 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
12540 @item Right recursion
12541 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
12542 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12546 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
12547 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
12548 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
12551 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
12552 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
12553 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12555 @item Single-character literal
12556 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
12557 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
12560 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
12561 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
12562 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
12563 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
12566 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
12567 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
12568 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
12571 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
12572 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12575 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
12576 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
12577 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
12578 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
12580 @item Terminal symbol
12581 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
12582 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
12583 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12585 @item Unreachable state
12586 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
12587 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
12588 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
12591 @node Copying This Manual
12592 @appendix Copying This Manual
12596 @unnumbered Bibliography
12600 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
12601 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
12602 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
12603 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
12605 @item [Denny 2010 May]
12606 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
12607 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
12608 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
12609 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
12611 @item [Denny 2010 November]
12612 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
12613 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
12614 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
12615 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
12617 @item [DeRemer 1982]
12618 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
12619 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
12620 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
12621 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
12624 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
12625 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
12626 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
12629 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
12630 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
12631 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
12632 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
12635 @node Index of Terms
12636 @unnumbered Index of Terms
12642 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
12643 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
12644 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
12645 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
12646 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
12647 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
12648 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
12649 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
12650 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
12651 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
12652 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
12653 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
12654 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
12655 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
12656 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
12657 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
12658 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
12659 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
12660 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
12661 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
12662 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
12663 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
12664 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
12665 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
12666 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
12667 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
12668 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
12669 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
12670 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
12671 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
12672 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
12673 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
12674 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
12675 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
12676 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
12677 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
12678 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
12679 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
12680 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
12681 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
12682 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
12683 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
12684 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
12685 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
12686 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
12687 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
12688 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
12689 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
12690 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
12691 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
12692 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
12693 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
12694 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
12695 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
12696 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose
12698 @c Local Variables:
12699 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"