1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual is for @acronym{GNU} Bison (version @value{VERSION},
34 @value{UPDATED}), the @acronym{GNU} parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1998,
37 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the @acronym{GNU} Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A @acronym{GNU} Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``@acronym{GNU} Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The @acronym{FSF}'s Back-Cover Text is: ``You have freedom to copy
49 and modify this @acronym{GNU} Manual, like @acronym{GNU} software.
50 Copies published by the Free Software Foundation raise funds for
51 @acronym{GNU} development.''
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). @acronym{GNU} parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
75 @acronym{ISBN} 1-882114-44-2
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The @acronym{GNU} General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser source file).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
115 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
117 The Concepts of Bison
119 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
120 as mathematical ideas.
121 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
122 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
123 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
124 the name of an identifier, etc.).
125 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
126 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
127 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
128 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
129 how is the output used?
130 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
131 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
133 Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers
135 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers on unambiguous grammars.
136 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers to resolve ambiguities.
137 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
138 * Compiler Requirements:: @acronym{GLR} parsers require a modern C compiler.
142 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
143 a first example with no operator precedence.
144 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
145 Operator precedence is introduced.
146 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
147 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
148 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
149 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
150 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
152 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
154 * Decls: Rpcalc Decls. Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
155 * Rules: Rpcalc Rules. Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
156 * Lexer: Rpcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
157 * Main: Rpcalc Main. The controlling function.
158 * Error: Rpcalc Error. The error reporting function.
159 * Gen: Rpcalc Gen. Running Bison on the grammar file.
160 * Comp: Rpcalc Compile. Run the C compiler on the output code.
162 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
168 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
170 * Decls: Ltcalc Decls. Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
171 * Rules: Ltcalc Rules. Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
172 * Lexer: Ltcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
174 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
176 * Decl: Mfcalc Decl. Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
177 * Rules: Mfcalc Rules. Grammar rules for the calculator.
178 * Symtab: Mfcalc Symtab. Symbol table management subroutines.
182 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
183 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
184 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
185 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
186 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
187 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
188 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
189 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
191 Outline of a Bison Grammar
193 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
194 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
195 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
196 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
197 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
199 Defining Language Semantics
201 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
202 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
203 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
204 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
205 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
206 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
207 action in the middle of a rule.
211 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
212 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
213 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
217 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
218 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
219 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
220 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
221 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
222 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
223 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
224 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
225 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
226 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
227 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
229 Parser C-Language Interface
231 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
232 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
234 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
235 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
236 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
239 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
241 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
242 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
243 of the token it has read.
244 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
245 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
247 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs
248 in a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
250 The Bison Parser Algorithm
252 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
253 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
254 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
255 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
256 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
257 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
258 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
259 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
260 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
264 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
265 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
266 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
267 * How Precedence:: How they work.
269 Handling Context Dependencies
271 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
272 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
273 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
274 error recovery rules must be written.
276 Debugging Your Parser
278 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
279 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
283 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
284 in alphabetical order by short options.
285 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
286 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
288 Parsers Written In Other Languages
290 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
291 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
295 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
296 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
297 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
298 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
299 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
300 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
302 A Complete C++ Example
304 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
305 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
306 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
307 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
308 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
312 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
313 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
314 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
315 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
316 * Java Scanner Interface:: Java scanners, and pure parsers
317 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
319 Frequently Asked Questions
321 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
322 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
323 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
324 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
325 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
326 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison @acronym{POSIX} safe?
327 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
328 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
329 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
330 * Other Languages:: Parsers in Java and others
331 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
332 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
336 * GNU Free Documentation License:: License for copying this manual.
342 @unnumbered Introduction
345 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
346 annotated context-free grammar into an @acronym{LALR}(1) or
347 @acronym{GLR} parser for that grammar. Once you are proficient with
348 Bison, you can use it to develop a wide range of language parsers, from those
349 used in simple desk calculators to complex programming languages.
351 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc grammars
352 ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar with Yacc
353 should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need to be fluent in
354 C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to understand this manual.
356 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of using
357 Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the last. If you
358 don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these chapters. Reference
359 chapters follow which describe specific aspects of Bison in detail.
361 Bison was written primarily by Robert Corbett; Richard Stallman made it
362 Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University added
363 multi-character string literals and other features.
365 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
368 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
370 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
371 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
372 permissions applied only when Bison was generating @acronym{LALR}(1)
373 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
374 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
376 The other @acronym{GNU} programming tools, such as the @acronym{GNU} C
378 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
379 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
380 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
381 License to all of the Bison source code.
383 The output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser file---contains a
384 verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is the code for the
385 parser's implementation. (The actions from your grammar are inserted
386 into this implementation at one point, but most of the rest of the
387 implementation is not changed.) When we applied the @acronym{GPL}
388 terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
389 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
391 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
392 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
393 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
394 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
395 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
396 using the other @acronym{GNU} tools.
398 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
399 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
400 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
401 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
407 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
409 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
410 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
411 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
414 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
415 as mathematical ideas.
416 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
417 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
418 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
419 the name of an identifier, etc.).
420 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
421 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
422 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
423 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
424 how is the output used?
425 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
426 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
429 @node Language and Grammar
430 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
432 @cindex context-free grammar
433 @cindex grammar, context-free
434 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
435 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
436 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
437 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
438 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
439 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
440 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
441 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
444 @cindex @acronym{BNF}
445 @cindex Backus-Naur form
446 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
447 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``@acronym{BNF}'', which was developed in
448 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
449 @acronym{BNF} is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
450 essentially machine-readable @acronym{BNF}.
452 @cindex @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars
453 @cindex @acronym{LR}(1) grammars
454 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammar. Although it
455 can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
456 are called @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars.
457 In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible to
458 tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single
459 token of lookahead. Strictly speaking, that is a description of an
460 @acronym{LR}(1) grammar, and @acronym{LALR}(1) involves additional
461 restrictions that are
462 hard to explain simply; but it is rare in actual practice to find an
463 @acronym{LR}(1) grammar that fails to be @acronym{LALR}(1).
464 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}, for
465 more information on this.
467 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
468 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
469 @cindex ambiguous grammars
470 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
472 Parsers for @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
473 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
474 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
475 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
476 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
477 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
478 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
479 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
480 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
481 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as @acronym{GLR}
482 parsing (for Generalized @acronym{LR}). Bison's @acronym{GLR} parsers
483 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
484 possible parses of any given string is finite.
486 @cindex symbols (abstract)
488 @cindex syntactic grouping
489 @cindex grouping, syntactic
490 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
491 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
492 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
493 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
494 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
495 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
496 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
498 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
499 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
500 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
501 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
502 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
503 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
504 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
505 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
506 lexicography, not grammar.)
508 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
512 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
513 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
514 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
515 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
516 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
517 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
518 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
523 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
524 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
525 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
526 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
527 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
531 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
532 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
533 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
534 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
535 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
536 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
537 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
538 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
540 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
541 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
542 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
543 reads informally as follows:
546 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
551 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
555 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
556 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
557 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
558 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
561 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
562 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
563 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
564 not the start symbol.
566 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
567 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
568 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
569 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
570 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
571 reports a syntax error.
573 @node Grammar in Bison
574 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
575 @cindex Bison grammar
576 @cindex grammar, Bison
577 @cindex formal grammar
579 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
580 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
581 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
583 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
584 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
585 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
587 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
588 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
589 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
590 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
591 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
592 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
593 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
596 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
597 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
598 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
599 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
601 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
602 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
604 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
605 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
606 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
607 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
611 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
616 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
618 @node Semantic Values
619 @section Semantic Values
620 @cindex semantic value
621 @cindex value, semantic
623 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
624 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
625 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
626 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
627 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
630 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
631 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
632 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
633 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
634 ,Defining Language Semantics},
637 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
638 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
639 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
640 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
643 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
644 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
645 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
646 need to have any semantic value.)
648 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
649 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
650 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
651 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
652 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
653 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
655 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
656 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
657 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
658 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
659 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
661 @node Semantic Actions
662 @section Semantic Actions
663 @cindex semantic actions
664 @cindex actions, semantic
666 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
667 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
668 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
669 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
672 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
673 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
674 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
675 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
676 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
677 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
678 newly recognized larger expression.
680 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
684 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
689 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
690 from the values of the two subexpressions.
693 @section Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers
694 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
695 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
698 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
699 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
701 In some grammars, Bison's standard
702 @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
703 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
704 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
705 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
706 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
707 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
708 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
709 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
711 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be @acronym{LALR}(1), a
712 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
713 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
714 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized @acronym{LR}
715 (@acronym{GLR}) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
716 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
717 declarations) identically to @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers. However, when
718 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
719 @acronym{GLR} parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
720 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
721 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
722 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
723 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
724 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
725 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
726 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
727 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
728 identical set of symbols.
730 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
731 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
732 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
733 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
734 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
735 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
736 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
737 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
738 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
742 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers on unambiguous grammars.
743 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers to resolve ambiguities.
744 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
745 * Compiler Requirements:: @acronym{GLR} parsers require a modern C compiler.
748 @node Simple GLR Parsers
749 @subsection Using @acronym{GLR} on Unambiguous Grammars
750 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing, unambiguous grammars
751 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing, unambiguous grammars
755 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
756 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
758 In the simplest cases, you can use the @acronym{GLR} algorithm
759 to parse grammars that are unambiguous, but fail to be @acronym{LALR}(1).
760 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead,
761 or (in rare cases) fall into the category of grammars in which the
762 @acronym{LALR}(1) algorithm throws away too much information (they are in
763 @acronym{LR}(1), but not @acronym{LALR}(1), @ref{Mystery Conflicts}).
765 Consider a problem that
766 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
767 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
770 type subrange = lo .. hi;
771 type enum = (a, b, c);
775 The original language standard allows only numeric
776 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
777 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (@acronym{ISO}/@acronym{IEC}
778 10206) and many other
779 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
780 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
784 type subrange = (a) .. b;
788 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
789 type with only one value:
796 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
797 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
799 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
800 With normal @acronym{LALR}(1) one-token lookahead it is not
801 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
802 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
803 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
804 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
805 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
806 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
808 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
809 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
810 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
811 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
814 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
815 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
816 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
817 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
818 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
819 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
822 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
823 use the @acronym{GLR} algorithm.
824 When the @acronym{GLR} parser reaches the critical state, it
825 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
826 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
827 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
828 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
829 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
830 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
831 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
832 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
834 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
835 reports a syntax error as usual.
837 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
838 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
839 lookahead than the underlying @acronym{LALR}(1) algorithm actually allows
840 for. In this example, @acronym{LALR}(2) would suffice, but also some cases
841 that are not @acronym{LALR}(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
843 In general, a @acronym{GLR} parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
844 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
845 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
846 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
847 The present example contains only one conflict between two
848 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
849 cannot be nested. So the number of
850 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
851 and the parsing time is still linear.
853 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
854 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
857 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
867 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
872 type : '(' id_list ')'
894 When used as a normal @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
895 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
896 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
897 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
904 The parser can be turned into a @acronym{GLR} parser, while also telling Bison
905 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by
906 adding these two declarations to the Bison input file (before the first
915 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
916 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
917 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
918 notice when the parser splits.
920 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of @acronym{GLR},
921 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
922 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
923 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that @acronym{GLR}
924 splitting is only done where it is intended. A @acronym{GLR} parser
925 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
926 @acronym{LALR} parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
927 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
928 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
929 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
930 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
931 eliminated by using @acronym{GLR} to shift the complications from the
932 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
935 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
936 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
937 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
938 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
939 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
940 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
942 @node Merging GLR Parses
943 @subsection Using @acronym{GLR} to Resolve Ambiguities
944 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing, ambiguous grammars
945 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing, ambiguous grammars
949 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
951 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
956 #define YYSTYPE char const *
958 void yyerror (char const *);
971 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
974 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
978 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
979 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
980 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
981 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
982 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
985 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
986 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
987 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
988 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
991 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
997 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
998 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1005 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1006 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1007 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1008 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1009 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1010 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1011 @acronym{GLR} parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1012 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1013 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1014 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1015 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1016 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1017 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1018 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1020 At this point, the @acronym{GLR} parser requires a specification in the
1021 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1022 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1023 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1024 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1025 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1026 The parser therefore prints
1029 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1032 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1033 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1040 This is another example of using @acronym{GLR} to parse an unambiguous
1041 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1042 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1043 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1044 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1045 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1046 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1047 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1048 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1049 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1055 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1056 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1057 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1058 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1062 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1063 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1068 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1072 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1080 with an accompanying forward declaration
1081 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1085 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1086 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1091 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1092 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1095 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1098 Bison requires that all of the
1099 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1100 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1101 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1102 the offending merge.
1104 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1105 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1107 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1108 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1109 the associated reduction.
1110 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1111 action in a @acronym{GLR} parser.
1114 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yychar}
1116 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yylval}
1118 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yylloc}
1119 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1120 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1121 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1122 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1123 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1124 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1125 influence syntax analysis.
1126 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1129 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1130 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1131 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1132 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1133 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1134 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1135 future versions of Bison.
1136 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1137 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1138 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1141 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1142 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1143 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1144 initiate error recovery.
1145 During deterministic @acronym{GLR} operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1146 the same as its effect in an @acronym{LALR}(1) parser.
1147 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1148 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1150 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1151 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in @acronym{GLR} parsers.
1153 @node Compiler Requirements
1154 @subsection Considerations when Compiling @acronym{GLR} Parsers
1155 @cindex @code{inline}
1156 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{inline}
1158 The @acronym{GLR} parsers require a compiler for @acronym{ISO} C89 or
1159 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1160 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1161 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1162 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1163 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1172 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1176 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1182 @node Locations Overview
1185 @cindex textual location
1186 @cindex location, textual
1188 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1189 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1190 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1191 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1193 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1194 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens and
1195 groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1196 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Locations}, for more details).
1198 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1199 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1200 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1203 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1204 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1205 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1206 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1207 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1208 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1209 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1212 @section Bison Output: the Parser File
1213 @cindex Bison parser
1214 @cindex Bison utility
1215 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1218 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The output
1219 is a C source file that parses the language described by the grammar.
1220 This file is called a @dfn{Bison parser}. Keep in mind that the Bison
1221 utility and the Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility
1222 is a program whose output is the Bison parser that becomes part of your
1225 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1226 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1227 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1230 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1231 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1232 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1233 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1234 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1235 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1236 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1238 The Bison parser file is C code which defines a function named
1239 @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This function does not make
1240 a complete C program: you must supply some additional functions. One is
1241 the lexical analyzer. Another is an error-reporting function which the
1242 parser calls to report an error. In addition, a complete C program must
1243 start with a function called @code{main}; you have to provide this, and
1244 arrange for it to call @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run.
1245 @xref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}.
1247 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1248 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser file itself
1249 begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface functions
1250 such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the error reporting
1251 function @code{yyerror} and the parser function @code{yyparse} itself.
1252 This also includes numerous identifiers used for internal purposes.
1253 Therefore, you should avoid using C identifiers starting with @samp{yy}
1254 or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar file except for the ones defined in
1255 this manual. Also, you should avoid using the C identifiers
1256 @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for anything other than their usual
1259 In some cases the Bison parser file includes system headers, and in
1260 those cases your code should respect the identifiers reserved by those
1261 headers. On some non-@acronym{GNU} hosts, @code{<alloca.h>}, @code{<malloc.h>},
1262 @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are included as needed to
1263 declare memory allocators and related types. @code{<libintl.h>} is
1264 included if message translation is in use
1265 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may
1266 be included if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value
1267 (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1270 @section Stages in Using Bison
1271 @cindex stages in using Bison
1274 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1275 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1279 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1280 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1281 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1282 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1283 sequence of C statements.
1286 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1287 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1288 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1289 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1292 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1295 Write error-reporting routines.
1298 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1299 must follow these steps:
1303 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1306 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1309 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1312 @node Grammar Layout
1313 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1314 @cindex grammar file
1316 @cindex format of grammar file
1317 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1319 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1320 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1327 @var{Bison declarations}
1336 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1337 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1339 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1340 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1341 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1342 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1343 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1344 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1346 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1347 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1348 semantic values of various symbols.
1350 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1353 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1354 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1355 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1359 @cindex simple examples
1360 @cindex examples, simple
1362 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1363 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1364 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1365 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1366 desk-top calculator.
1368 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1369 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1370 source file to try them.
1373 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1374 a first example with no operator precedence.
1375 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1376 Operator precedence is introduced.
1377 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1378 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1379 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1380 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1381 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1385 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1386 @cindex reverse polish notation
1387 @cindex polish notation calculator
1388 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1389 @cindex calculator, simple
1391 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1392 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1393 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1394 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1396 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1397 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison input files.
1400 * Decls: Rpcalc Decls. Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1401 * Rules: Rpcalc Rules. Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1402 * Lexer: Rpcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
1403 * Main: Rpcalc Main. The controlling function.
1404 * Error: Rpcalc Error. The error reporting function.
1405 * Gen: Rpcalc Gen. Running Bison on the grammar file.
1406 * Comp: Rpcalc Compile. Run the C compiler on the output code.
1410 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1412 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1413 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1416 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1419 #define YYSTYPE double
1422 void yyerror (char const *);
1427 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1430 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1431 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1433 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1434 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1435 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1436 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1437 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1438 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1439 which is a floating point number.
1441 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1442 function @code{pow}.
1444 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1445 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1446 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1447 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1450 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1451 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1452 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1453 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1454 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1455 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1456 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1457 type for numeric constants.
1460 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1462 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1470 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1473 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1474 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1475 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1476 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1477 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1478 /* Exponentiation */
1479 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1481 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1486 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1487 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1488 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1489 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1490 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1493 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1494 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1495 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1497 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1498 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1499 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1500 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1501 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1502 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1511 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1513 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1521 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1522 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1523 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1524 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1525 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1527 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1528 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1529 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1530 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1531 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1532 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1534 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1535 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1536 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1537 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1540 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1541 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1542 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1545 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1547 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1551 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1555 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1556 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1557 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1558 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1559 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1560 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1561 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1563 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1564 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1565 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1566 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1567 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1570 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1572 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1573 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1574 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1575 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1579 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1580 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1585 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1586 equally well have written them separately:
1590 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1591 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1595 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1596 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1597 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1598 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1599 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1600 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1601 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1602 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1604 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1605 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1606 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1608 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1609 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1613 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1617 means the same thing as this:
1621 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1627 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1630 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1631 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1632 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1634 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1635 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1636 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1637 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1639 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the @acronym{RPN}
1641 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1642 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1643 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1644 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1646 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1647 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1648 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1649 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1650 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1651 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1652 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1653 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1654 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1656 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1657 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1658 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1659 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Decls,
1660 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1662 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1663 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1665 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1669 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1670 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1671 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1672 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1683 /* Skip white space. */
1684 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1688 /* Process numbers. */
1689 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1692 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1697 /* Return end-of-input. */
1700 /* Return a single char. */
1707 @subsection The Controlling Function
1708 @cindex controlling function
1709 @cindex main function in simple example
1711 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1712 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1713 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1726 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1727 @cindex error reporting routine
1729 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1730 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1731 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1732 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1733 here is the definition we will use:
1739 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1741 yyerror (char const *s)
1743 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1748 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1749 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1750 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1751 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1752 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1753 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1756 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1757 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1759 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1760 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1761 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file. The
1762 definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} go at the
1763 end, in the epilogue of the file
1764 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1766 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1767 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1769 With all the source in a single file, you use the following command to
1770 convert it into a parser file:
1777 In this example the file was called @file{rpcalc.y} (for ``Reverse Polish
1778 @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c},
1779 removing the @samp{.y} from the original file name. The file output by
1780 Bison contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional
1781 functions in the input file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main})
1782 are copied verbatim to the output.
1784 @node Rpcalc Compile
1785 @subsection Compiling the Parser File
1786 @cindex compiling the parser
1788 Here is how to compile and run the parser file:
1792 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1794 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1798 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1799 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1800 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1804 # @r{List files again.}
1806 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1810 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1811 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1817 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1819 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1823 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1825 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1830 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1831 @cindex infix notation calculator
1833 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1835 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1836 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1837 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1838 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1841 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1844 #define YYSTYPE double
1848 void yyerror (char const *);
1851 /* Bison declarations. */
1855 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1856 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1858 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1864 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1867 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1868 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1869 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1870 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1871 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1872 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1873 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1874 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1880 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1883 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1885 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1886 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1887 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1888 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1889 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1890 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1893 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1894 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1895 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1896 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1897 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1900 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1901 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1902 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1903 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1904 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1906 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1911 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1919 @node Simple Error Recovery
1920 @section Simple Error Recovery
1921 @cindex error recovery, simple
1923 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1924 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1925 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1926 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1927 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1928 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1930 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1931 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1932 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1937 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1938 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
1943 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
1944 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
1945 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
1946 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
1947 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
1948 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
1949 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
1950 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
1953 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
1954 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
1955 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
1956 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
1957 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
1958 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
1961 @node Location Tracking Calc
1962 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
1963 @cindex location tracking calculator
1964 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
1965 @cindex calculator, location tracking
1967 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
1968 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
1969 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
1970 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
1974 * Decls: Ltcalc Decls. Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
1975 * Rules: Ltcalc Rules. Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
1976 * Lexer: Ltcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
1980 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
1982 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
1983 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
1986 /* Location tracking calculator. */
1992 void yyerror (char const *);
1995 /* Bison declarations. */
2003 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2007 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2008 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2009 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2010 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2011 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2012 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2013 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2017 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2019 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2020 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2021 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2022 from the new information.
2024 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2025 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2036 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2041 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2042 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2043 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2044 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2054 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2055 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2056 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2061 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2062 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2063 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2067 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2068 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2069 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2071 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2072 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2073 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2074 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2075 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2076 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2080 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2082 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2083 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2084 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2087 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2088 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2099 /* Skip white space. */
2100 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2101 ++yylloc.last_column;
2106 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2107 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2111 /* Process numbers. */
2115 ++yylloc.last_column;
2116 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2118 ++yylloc.last_column;
2119 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2126 /* Return end-of-input. */
2130 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2134 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2137 ++yylloc.last_column;
2142 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2143 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2144 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2145 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2147 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2148 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2149 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2150 controlling function:
2157 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2158 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2164 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2165 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2166 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2168 @node Multi-function Calc
2169 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2170 @cindex multi-function calculator
2171 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2172 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2174 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2175 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2176 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2177 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2178 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2180 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2181 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2182 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2183 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2184 functions whose syntax has this form:
2187 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2191 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2192 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2193 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2197 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2201 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2207 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2212 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2215 * Decl: Mfcalc Decl. Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2216 * Rules: Mfcalc Rules. Grammar rules for the calculator.
2217 * Symtab: Mfcalc Symtab. Symbol table management subroutines.
2221 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2223 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2228 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2229 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2231 void yyerror (char const *);
2236 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2237 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2240 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2241 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2248 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2249 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2251 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2254 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2255 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2256 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2258 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2259 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2260 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2261 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2263 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2264 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2265 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2266 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2267 between angle brackets).
2269 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2270 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2271 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2272 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2273 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2274 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2277 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2279 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2280 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2281 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2293 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2294 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2299 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2300 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2301 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2302 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2303 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2304 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2305 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2306 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2307 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2308 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2309 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2312 /* End of grammar. */
2317 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2318 @cindex symbol table example
2320 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2321 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2322 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2323 requires some additional C functions for support.
2325 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2326 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2327 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2331 /* Function type. */
2332 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2336 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2339 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2340 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2343 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2344 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2346 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2351 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2353 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2354 extern symrec *sym_table;
2356 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2357 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2361 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2362 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2363 @code{init_table} as well:
2369 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2371 yyerror (char const *s)
2381 double (*fnct) (double);
2386 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2399 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2404 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2410 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2412 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2413 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2428 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2429 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2431 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2432 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2433 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2434 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2435 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2436 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2440 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2443 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2444 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2445 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2446 ptr->type = sym_type;
2447 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2448 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2454 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2457 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2458 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2459 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2465 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2466 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2467 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2468 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2470 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2471 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2472 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2473 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2474 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2475 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2477 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2478 operators in @code{yylex}.
2491 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2492 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t');
2499 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2500 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2503 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2509 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2513 static char *symbuf = 0;
2514 static int length = 0;
2519 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2520 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2522 length = 40, symbuf = (char *)malloc (length + 1);
2529 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2533 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2535 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2537 /* Get another character. */
2542 while (isalnum (c));
2549 s = getsym (symbuf);
2551 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2556 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2562 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2563 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2564 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2572 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2575 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2576 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2577 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2580 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2581 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2585 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2587 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2588 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2590 The Bison grammar input file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2591 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2594 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2595 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2596 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2597 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2598 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2599 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
2600 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2601 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2604 @node Grammar Outline
2605 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2607 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2608 appropriate delimiters:
2615 @var{Bison declarations}
2624 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2625 As a @acronym{GNU} extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2626 continues until end of line.
2629 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2630 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2631 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2632 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2633 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2637 @subsection The prologue
2638 @cindex declarations section
2640 @cindex declarations
2642 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2643 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2644 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser file so that
2645 they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can use
2646 @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If you
2647 don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2648 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2650 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2651 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2654 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2655 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2656 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2657 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2658 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2659 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2660 @code{%union} declaration.
2671 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2675 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2676 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2682 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2683 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2684 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2685 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2686 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2687 @code{#include} directives.
2689 @node Prologue Alternatives
2690 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2691 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2694 @findex %code requires
2695 @findex %code provides
2697 (The prologue alternatives described here are experimental.
2698 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
2701 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2703 As an alternative, Bison provides a %code directive with an explicit qualifier
2704 field, which identifies the purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where
2705 Bison should generate it.
2706 For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default location, or it can be
2707 one of @code{requires}, @code{provides}, @code{top}.
2708 @xref{Decl Summary,,%code}.
2710 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2721 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2725 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2726 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2733 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a subtle
2734 distinction between their functionality.
2735 For example, if you decide to override Bison's default definition for
2736 @code{YYLTYPE}, in which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new
2738 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code into the
2739 parser source code file @emph{before} the default @code{YYLTYPE} definition.
2740 In which @var{Prologue} section should you prototype an internal function,
2741 @code{trace_token}, that accepts @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as
2743 You should prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2744 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2746 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2747 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2748 This behavior raises a few questions.
2749 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2750 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2751 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2752 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2753 This behavior is not intuitive.
2755 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2756 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2757 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2758 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2765 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2766 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2769 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2770 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2782 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2786 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2787 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2788 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2795 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2796 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2797 explicit which kind you intend.
2798 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2800 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts.
2801 The first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2802 parser source code file.
2803 The first line after the warning is required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also
2804 needs to appear in the parser source code file.
2805 However, if you've instructed Bison to generate a parser header file
2806 (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably want that line to appear before
2807 the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that header file as well.
2808 The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear in the parser header file to
2809 override the default @code{YYLTYPE} definition there.
2811 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2812 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2814 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2827 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2831 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2832 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2843 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2844 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2845 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2852 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new @code{YYLTYPE}
2853 definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2854 definitions in both the parser source code file and the parser header file.
2855 (By the same reasoning, @code{%code requires} would also be the appropriate
2856 place to write your own definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2858 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}, you
2859 should prefer @code{%code requires} over @code{%code top} regardless of whether
2860 you instruct Bison to generate a parser header file.
2861 When you are writing code that you need Bison to insert only into the parser
2862 source code file and that has no special need to appear at the top of that
2863 file, you should prefer the unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}.
2864 These practices will make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to
2865 Bison and to other developers reading your grammar file.
2866 Following these practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and
2867 @code{%code requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2870 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to provide
2871 @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your parser.
2872 Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into both the parser
2873 header file and the parser source code file.
2874 Since this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2875 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2876 @code{%code requires}.
2877 More importantly, since it depends upon @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype},
2878 @code{%code requires} is not sufficient.
2879 Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified @code{%code} to a
2880 @code{%code provides}:
2893 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2897 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2898 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2909 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2913 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2914 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2921 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the parser header
2922 file and the parser source code file after the definitions for
2923 @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYSTYPE}.
2925 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that reflects
2926 the layout of the generated parser source code and header files:
2927 @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, and then
2929 While your grammar files may generally be easier to read if you also follow
2930 this order, Bison does not require it.
2931 Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense to you.
2933 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
2934 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
2935 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
2936 the grammar file affects its functionality.
2938 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
2939 organize your grammar file.
2940 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
2944 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
2945 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
2946 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
2947 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
2949 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
2950 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
2951 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
2952 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
2956 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
2957 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
2959 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
2961 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
2962 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
2963 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
2964 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
2966 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
2967 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
2968 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
2969 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
2970 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
2971 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
2972 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
2973 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
2976 @node Bison Declarations
2977 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
2978 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
2979 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
2981 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
2982 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
2983 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
2984 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
2987 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
2988 @cindex grammar rules section
2989 @cindex rules section for grammar
2991 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
2992 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
2994 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
2995 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
2996 if it is the first thing in the file.
2999 @subsection The epilogue
3000 @cindex additional C code section
3002 @cindex C code, section for additional
3004 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser file, just as
3005 the @var{Prologue} is copied to the beginning. This is the most convenient
3006 place to put anything that you want to have in the parser file but which need
3007 not come before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the
3008 definitions of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because
3009 C requires functions to be declared before being used, you often need
3010 to declare functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue,
3011 even if you define them in the Epilogue.
3012 @xref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}.
3014 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3015 from the grammar rules.
3017 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3018 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3019 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3020 of the grammar file.
3023 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3024 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3025 @cindex terminal symbol
3029 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3032 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3033 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3034 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3035 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3036 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3037 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3038 the symbol to stand for it.
3040 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3041 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3042 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3044 Symbol names can contain letters, digits (not at the beginning),
3045 underscores and periods. Periods make sense only in nonterminals.
3047 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3051 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3052 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3053 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3054 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3057 @cindex character token
3058 @cindex literal token
3059 @cindex single-character literal
3060 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3061 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3062 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3063 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3064 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3065 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3066 ,Operator Precedence}).
3068 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3069 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3070 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3071 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3072 your program will confuse other readers.
3074 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3075 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3076 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3077 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3078 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3079 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3083 @cindex string token
3084 @cindex literal string token
3085 @cindex multicharacter literal
3086 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3087 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3088 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3089 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3090 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3092 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3093 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3094 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3095 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3096 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3098 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3100 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3101 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3102 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3103 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3104 read your program will be confused.
3106 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3107 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3108 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3109 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3110 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3111 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3114 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3115 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3116 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3118 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3119 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3120 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3121 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3122 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3123 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3124 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3125 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3126 Each named token type becomes a C macro in
3127 the parser file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code.
3128 (This is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.)
3129 @xref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3131 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3132 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3133 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3134 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3135 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3137 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3138 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3139 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3140 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3141 characters in the following C-language string:
3144 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3147 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3148 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3149 @acronym{ASCII} environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3150 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3151 @acronym{EBCDIC}, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3152 generated by Bison will assume @acronym{ASCII} numeric values for
3153 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3154 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3155 @acronym{ASCII} environment, so installers on platforms that are
3156 incompatible with @acronym{ASCII} must rebuild those files before
3159 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3160 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3161 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3162 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3163 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3166 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3168 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3169 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3171 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3175 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3181 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3182 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3183 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3195 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3196 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3198 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3199 extra white space as you wish.
3201 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3202 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3205 @{@var{C statements}@}
3210 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3211 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3212 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3213 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3214 copies the code to the output file, where the C compiler can check it.
3216 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3217 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3218 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3219 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3220 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3221 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3222 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3223 character constants.
3225 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3229 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3230 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3234 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3235 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3242 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3244 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3245 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3246 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3263 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3267 @section Recursive Rules
3268 @cindex recursive rule
3270 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3271 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3272 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3273 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3274 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3284 @cindex left recursion
3285 @cindex right recursion
3287 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3288 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3289 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3300 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3301 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3302 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3303 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3304 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3305 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3306 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3309 @cindex mutual recursion
3310 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3311 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3312 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3320 | primary '+' primary
3332 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3336 @section Defining Language Semantics
3337 @cindex defining language semantics
3338 @cindex language semantics, defining
3340 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3341 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3342 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3344 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3345 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3346 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3347 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3350 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3351 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3352 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3353 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3354 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3355 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3356 action in the middle of a rule.
3360 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3361 @cindex semantic value type
3362 @cindex value type, semantic
3363 @cindex data types of semantic values
3364 @cindex default data type
3366 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3367 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3368 @acronym{RPN} and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3369 Notation Calculator}).
3371 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3372 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3373 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3376 #define YYSTYPE double
3380 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3381 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3382 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3383 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3385 @node Multiple Types
3386 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3388 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3389 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3390 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3391 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3394 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3395 requires you to do two things:
3399 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3400 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3401 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3402 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3406 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3407 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3408 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3409 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3410 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3419 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3420 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3421 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3422 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3424 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3425 placed at any position in the rule;
3426 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3427 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3428 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3429 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3431 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the components
3432 matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}}, which stands for
3433 the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic value for the grouping
3434 being constructed is @code{$$}. Bison translates both of these
3435 constructs into expressions of the appropriate type when it copies the
3436 actions into the parser file. @code{$$} is translated to a modifiable
3437 lvalue, so it can be assigned to.
3439 Here is a typical example:
3450 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3451 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3452 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3453 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3454 The sum is stored into @code{$$} so that it becomes the semantic value of
3455 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3456 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3457 referred to as @code{$2}.
3459 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3460 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3461 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3462 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3463 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3467 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3471 @cindex default action
3472 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3473 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3474 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3475 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3476 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3477 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3479 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3480 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3481 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3482 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3483 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3487 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3488 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3494 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3499 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3500 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3501 definition of @code{foo}.
3504 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3505 any, from a semantic action.
3506 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3507 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3510 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3511 @cindex action data types
3512 @cindex data types in actions
3514 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3515 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3517 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3518 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3519 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3520 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3521 in the rule. In this example,
3532 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3533 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3534 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3535 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3537 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3538 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3539 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3551 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3552 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3554 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3555 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3556 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3557 @cindex mid-rule actions
3559 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3560 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3561 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3563 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3564 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3565 it is run before they are parsed.
3567 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3568 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3569 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3570 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3573 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3574 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3575 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3576 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3577 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3578 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3580 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3581 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3582 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3583 at the end of the rule.
3585 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3586 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3587 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3588 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3589 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3590 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3594 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3595 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3596 declare_variable ($3); @}
3598 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3603 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3604 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3605 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3606 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3607 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3608 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3609 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3610 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3612 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3613 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3614 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3615 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3616 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3619 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3620 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3621 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3622 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3623 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3625 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3626 Discarded Symbols}).
3627 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3628 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3630 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3631 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3636 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3642 pop_context ($1); @}
3645 let: LET '(' var ')'
3646 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3647 declare_variable ($3); @}
3654 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3655 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3656 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3658 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3659 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3660 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3661 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3662 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3667 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3668 | '@{' statements '@}'
3674 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3678 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3679 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3682 | '@{' statements '@}'
3688 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3689 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3690 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3691 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3692 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3693 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3695 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3696 actions into the two rules, like this:
3700 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3701 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3702 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3703 '@{' statements '@}'
3709 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3710 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3712 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3713 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3714 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3718 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3719 declarations statements '@}'
3720 | '@{' statements '@}'
3726 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3727 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3729 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3730 serves as a subroutine:
3734 subroutine: /* empty */
3735 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3741 compound: subroutine
3742 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3744 '@{' statements '@}'
3750 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3751 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3754 @section Tracking Locations
3756 @cindex textual location
3757 @cindex location, textual
3759 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3760 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3761 especially symbol locations.
3763 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3764 actions to take when rules are matched.
3767 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3768 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3769 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3773 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3774 @cindex data type of locations
3775 @cindex default location type
3777 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3778 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3780 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3781 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3782 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3783 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3787 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3796 At the beginning of the parsing, Bison initializes all these fields to 1
3799 @node Actions and Locations
3800 @subsection Actions and Locations
3801 @cindex location actions
3802 @cindex actions, location
3806 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3807 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3809 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3810 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3811 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3812 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3813 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3816 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3823 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3824 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3825 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3826 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3833 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3834 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3835 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3841 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3842 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3843 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
3846 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
3847 example above simply rewrites this way:
3860 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3861 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3862 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3869 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
3870 from a semantic action.
3871 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
3872 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3874 @node Location Default Action
3875 @subsection Default Action for Locations
3876 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
3877 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
3879 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
3880 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
3881 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
3882 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
3883 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
3884 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
3885 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a @acronym{GLR}
3886 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
3889 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
3890 dedicated code from semantic actions.
3892 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
3893 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
3894 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
3895 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
3896 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
3897 When a @acronym{GLR} parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
3898 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
3899 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
3900 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
3901 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
3903 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
3907 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
3911 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
3912 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
3913 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
3914 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
3918 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
3919 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
3920 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
3921 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
3927 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
3928 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
3929 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
3931 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
3935 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
3936 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
3939 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
3940 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
3941 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
3942 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
3945 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
3946 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
3947 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
3948 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
3952 @section Bison Declarations
3953 @cindex declarations, Bison
3954 @cindex Bison declarations
3956 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
3957 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
3960 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
3961 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
3962 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
3963 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
3965 The first rule in the file also specifies the start symbol, by default.
3966 If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you must declare
3967 it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
3971 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
3972 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
3973 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
3974 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
3975 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
3976 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
3977 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
3978 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
3979 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
3980 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
3981 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
3985 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
3986 @cindex version requirement
3987 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
3990 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
3991 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
3995 %require "@var{version}"
3999 @subsection Token Type Names
4000 @cindex declaring token type names
4001 @cindex token type names, declaring
4002 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4005 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4011 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4012 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4013 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4015 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4016 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4017 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4020 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4021 a decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4022 following the token name:
4026 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4030 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4031 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4032 with each other or with normal characters.
4034 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4035 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4036 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4037 Than One Value Type}).
4043 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4047 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4051 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4052 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4053 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4060 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4061 equivalent literal string tokens:
4064 %token <operator> OR "||"
4065 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4070 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4071 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4072 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4073 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4075 @node Precedence Decl
4076 @subsection Operator Precedence
4077 @cindex precedence declarations
4078 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4079 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4081 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4082 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4083 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4084 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4085 operator precedence.
4087 The syntax of a precedence declaration is the same as that of
4088 @code{%token}: either
4091 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4098 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4101 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4102 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4103 all the @var{symbols}:
4107 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4108 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4109 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4110 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4111 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4112 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4113 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4114 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4115 considered a syntax error.
4118 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4119 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4120 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4121 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4122 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4126 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4127 @cindex declaring value types
4128 @cindex value types, declaring
4131 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4132 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4133 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4148 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4149 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4150 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4151 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4153 As an extension to @acronym{POSIX}, a tag is allowed after the
4154 @code{union}. For example:
4166 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4167 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4170 As another extension to @acronym{POSIX}, you may specify multiple
4171 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4172 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4174 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4175 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4177 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4178 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4179 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4180 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4188 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4193 and then your grammar can use the following
4194 instead of @code{%union}:
4207 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4208 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4209 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4213 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4214 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4215 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4218 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4222 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4223 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4224 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4225 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4226 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4229 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4230 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4231 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4232 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4234 @node Initial Action Decl
4235 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4236 @findex %initial-action
4238 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4239 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4242 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4243 @findex %initial-action
4244 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4245 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4246 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4247 @code{%parse-param}.
4250 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4253 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4256 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4261 @node Destructor Decl
4262 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4263 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4267 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4268 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4269 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4270 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4271 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4272 must discard the start symbol.
4274 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4275 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4276 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4277 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4279 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4280 symbol is automatically discarded.
4282 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4284 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4286 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4287 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4288 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4289 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4291 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4292 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4293 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4294 tag among @var{symbols}.
4295 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4296 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4297 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4299 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4300 (These default forms are experimental.
4301 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4303 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4304 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4305 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4306 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4308 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4309 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4310 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4311 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4312 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4319 %union @{ char *string; @}
4320 %token <string> STRING1
4321 %token <string> STRING2
4322 %type <string> string1
4323 %type <string> string2
4324 %union @{ char character; @}
4325 %token <character> CHR
4326 %type <character> chr
4329 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4330 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4331 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4332 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4336 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4337 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4338 to @code{free} by default.
4339 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4340 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4341 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4342 @code{free} only once.
4343 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4344 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4346 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4347 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4348 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4349 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4350 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4351 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4352 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4353 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4354 reference it in your grammar.
4355 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4356 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4362 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4363 @cindex mid-rule actions
4364 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4365 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4366 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you do
4367 not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}} (where
4368 @var{n} is the RHS symbol position of the mid-rule) in any later action in that
4370 However, if you do reference either, the Bison-generated parser will invoke the
4371 @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4375 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4376 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4377 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4382 @cindex discarded symbols
4383 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4387 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4389 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4391 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4392 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4394 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4397 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4398 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4401 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4402 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4403 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4407 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4408 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4409 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4410 @cindex warnings, preventing
4411 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4415 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4416 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4417 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4418 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4419 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4420 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4422 The declaration looks like this:
4428 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4429 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4430 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4431 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4433 For normal @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4434 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4435 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With @acronym{GLR}
4436 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4437 there would be no need to use @acronym{GLR} parsing. Therefore, it is
4438 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4439 in @acronym{GLR} parsers, using the declaration:
4445 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4449 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4450 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4451 print the number of conflicts.
4454 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4455 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4456 go back to the beginning.
4459 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4460 number which Bison printed. With @acronym{GLR} parsers, add an
4461 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4464 Now Bison will warn you if you introduce an unexpected conflict, but
4465 will keep silent otherwise.
4468 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4469 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4470 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4471 @cindex default start symbol
4474 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4475 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4476 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4483 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4484 @cindex reentrant parser
4486 @findex %pure-parser
4488 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4489 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4490 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4491 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4492 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4493 program must be called only within interlocks.
4495 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4496 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4497 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4498 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4499 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4501 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4502 declaration @code{%pure-parser} says that you want the parser to be
4503 reentrant. It looks like this:
4509 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4510 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4511 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4512 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4513 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs} also
4514 becomes local in @code{yyparse} (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4515 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4516 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4518 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4519 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4523 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4524 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4525 @cindex declaration summary
4526 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4528 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4530 @deffn {Directive} %union
4531 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4532 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4535 @deffn {Directive} %token
4536 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4537 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4540 @deffn {Directive} %right
4541 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4542 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4545 @deffn {Directive} %left
4546 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4547 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4550 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4551 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4552 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4553 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4557 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4558 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4559 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4563 @deffn {Directive} %type
4564 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4565 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4568 @deffn {Directive} %start
4569 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4573 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4574 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4575 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4581 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4584 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4586 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
4587 It inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location in the
4588 output@footnote{The default location is actually skeleton-dependent;
4589 writers of non-standard skeletons however should choose the default location
4590 consistently with the behavior of the standard Bison skeletons.}.
4593 For C/C++, the default location is the parser source code
4594 file after the usual contents of the parser header file.
4595 Thus, @code{%code} replaces the traditional Yacc prologue,
4596 @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}, for most purposes.
4597 For a detailed discussion, see @ref{Prologue Alternatives}.
4599 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
4601 (Like all the Yacc prologue alternatives, this directive is experimental.
4602 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
4606 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4607 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
4608 If you need to specify location-sensitive verbatim @var{code} that does not
4609 belong at the default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form,
4610 use this form instead.
4612 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the location(s)
4613 where Bison should generate it.
4614 Not all values of @var{qualifier} are available for all target languages:
4617 @findex %code requires
4621 @item Language(s): C, C++
4623 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
4624 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
4625 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
4626 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
4627 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
4629 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser source code file
4630 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
4634 @findex %code provides
4637 @item Language(s): C, C++
4639 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
4640 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
4642 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser source code file after
4643 the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and token definitions.
4650 @item Language(s): C, C++
4652 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires} should
4653 usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}.
4654 However, occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
4655 parser source code file.
4665 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser source code file.
4669 @findex %code imports
4672 @item Language(s): Java
4674 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
4676 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
4677 before any class definitions.
4681 (Like all the Yacc prologue alternatives, this directive is experimental.
4682 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
4686 For a detailed discussion of how to use @code{%code} in place of the
4687 traditional Yacc prologue for C/C++, see @ref{Prologue Alternatives}.
4690 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4691 In the parser file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 if it is not
4692 already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
4694 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4696 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
4697 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
4698 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior.
4699 The possible choices for @var{variable}, as well as their meanings, depend on
4700 the selected target language and/or the parser skeleton (@pxref{Decl
4701 Summary,,%language}).
4703 Bison will warn if a @var{variable} is defined multiple times.
4705 Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} is always equivalent to specifying it as
4708 Some @var{variable}s may be used as booleans.
4709 In this case, Bison will complain if the variable definition does not meet one
4710 of the following four conditions:
4713 @item @code{"@var{value}"} is @code{"true"}
4715 @item @code{"@var{value}"} is omitted (or is @code{""}).
4716 This is equivalent to @code{"true"}.
4718 @item @code{"@var{value}"} is @code{"false"}.
4720 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
4721 In this case, Bison selects a default value, which may depend on the selected
4722 target language and/or parser skeleton.
4726 @deffn {Directive} %defines
4727 Write a header file containing macro definitions for the token type
4728 names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
4729 If the parser output file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then this file
4730 is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
4732 For C parsers, the output header declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
4733 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
4734 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}.
4735 Therefore, if you are using a @code{%union}
4736 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}) with components that
4737 require other definitions, or if you have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro
4739 (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to
4740 arrange for these definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by
4741 putting them in a prerequisite header that is included both by your
4742 parser and by any other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
4744 Unless your parser is pure, the output header declares @code{yylval}
4745 as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
4748 If you have also used locations, the output header declares
4749 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of
4750 the @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Locations, ,Tracking
4753 This output file is normally essential if you wish to put the definition
4754 of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because @code{yylex}
4755 typically needs to be able to refer to the above-mentioned declarations
4756 and to the token type codes. @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of
4759 @findex %code requires
4760 @findex %code provides
4761 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
4762 header also contains their code.
4763 @xref{Decl Summary, ,%code}.
4766 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
4767 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
4770 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
4771 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
4772 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
4775 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
4776 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names are
4777 chosen as if the input file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
4780 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
4781 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
4782 supported languages include C and C++.
4783 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
4786 @deffn {Directive} %locations
4787 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
4788 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
4789 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
4790 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
4791 accurate syntax error messages.
4794 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
4795 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
4796 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
4798 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
4799 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
4800 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. For example, if you use
4801 @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex},
4802 and so on. In C++ parsers, it is only the surrounding namespace which is
4803 named @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}.
4804 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
4808 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
4809 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
4810 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
4815 @deffn {Directive} %no-parser
4816 Do not include any C code in the parser file; generate tables only. The
4817 parser file contains just @code{#define} directives and static variable
4820 This option also tells Bison to write the C code for the grammar actions
4821 into a file named @file{@var{file}.act}, in the form of a
4822 brace-surrounded body fit for a @code{switch} statement.
4825 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
4826 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
4827 file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the parser file so that
4828 the C compiler and debuggers will associate errors and object code with
4829 your source file (the grammar file). This directive causes them to
4830 associate errors with the parser file, treating it an independent source
4831 file in its own right.
4834 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
4835 Specify @var{file} for the parser file.
4838 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
4839 Request a pure (reentrant) parser program (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
4840 (Reentrant) Parser}).
4843 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
4844 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
4845 Require a Version of Bison}.
4848 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
4849 Specify the skeleton to use.
4851 You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
4852 You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
4853 different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
4854 correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
4856 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
4857 file in the Bison installation directory.
4858 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
4859 directory of the grammar file.
4860 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
4863 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
4864 Generate an array of token names in the parser file. The name of the
4865 array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is the name of the
4866 token whose internal Bison token code number is @var{i}. The first
4867 three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the predefined tokens
4869 @code{"error"}, and @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols
4870 defined in the grammar file.
4872 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
4873 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
4874 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
4875 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
4876 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
4877 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
4878 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
4881 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
4882 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
4883 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
4887 The highest token number, plus one.
4889 The number of nonterminal symbols.
4891 The number of grammar rules,
4893 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
4897 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
4898 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
4899 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
4900 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
4904 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
4905 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
4906 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
4910 @node Multiple Parsers
4911 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
4913 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
4914 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
4915 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
4916 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
4918 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
4919 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
4920 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
4921 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
4922 names that do not conflict.
4924 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
4925 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
4926 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. For example, if you use @samp{-p c},
4927 the names become @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, and so on.
4929 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
4930 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
4931 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
4932 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
4933 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
4935 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the beginning
4936 of the parser source file, defining @code{yyparse} as
4937 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes one
4938 name for the other in the entire parser file.
4941 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
4942 @cindex C-language interface
4945 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
4946 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
4947 functions that it needs to use.
4949 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
4950 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
4951 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
4952 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
4955 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
4956 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
4958 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
4959 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
4960 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
4964 @node Parser Function
4965 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
4968 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
4969 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
4970 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
4971 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
4972 without reading further.
4975 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
4976 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
4977 is due to end-of-input).
4979 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
4980 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
4983 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
4986 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
4991 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
4996 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
4999 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5000 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5001 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5003 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5004 @findex %parse-param
5005 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5006 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5007 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5008 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5009 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5012 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5015 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5016 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5020 Then call the parser like this:
5024 int nastiness, randomness;
5025 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5026 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5032 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5035 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5040 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5042 @cindex lexical analyzer
5044 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5045 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5046 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5047 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5049 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the Bison
5050 grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source file, you
5051 need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be available there.
5052 To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run Bison, so that it will
5053 write these macro definitions into a separate header file
5054 @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include in the other source files
5055 that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
5058 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5059 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5060 of the token it has read.
5061 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5062 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5064 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs
5065 in a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5068 @node Calling Convention
5069 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5071 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5072 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5073 signifies end-of-input.
5075 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5076 in the parser file becomes a C macro whose definition is the proper
5077 numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can use the name
5078 to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5080 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5081 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5082 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5083 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5084 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5085 signifies end-of-input.
5087 Here is an example showing these things:
5094 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5097 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5098 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5100 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5106 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5107 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5109 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5110 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5114 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5115 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5116 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5117 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5120 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5121 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5122 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5123 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5124 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5127 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5128 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5129 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5130 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5133 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5136 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5137 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5138 strlen (token_buffer))
5139 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5140 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5145 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5146 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5150 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5153 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5154 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5155 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5156 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5162 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5163 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5168 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5169 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5170 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5171 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5172 declaration looks like this:
5185 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5190 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5191 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5196 @node Token Locations
5197 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5200 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Locations, ,
5201 Tracking Locations}) in actions to keep track of the textual locations
5202 of tokens and groupings, then you must provide this information in
5203 @code{yylex}. The function @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual
5204 location of a token just parsed in the global variable @code{yylloc}.
5205 So @code{yylex} must store the proper data in that variable.
5207 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5208 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5209 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5210 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5211 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5214 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5217 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5219 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%pure-parser} to request a
5220 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5221 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5222 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5223 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5224 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
5229 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
5232 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5233 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5238 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
5239 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
5240 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
5244 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
5245 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
5248 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5250 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
5251 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
5257 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5258 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5259 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5263 results in the following signature:
5266 int yylex (int *nastiness);
5267 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5270 If @code{%pure-parser} is added:
5273 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
5274 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5278 and finally, if both @code{%pure-parser} and @code{%locations} are used:
5281 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5282 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5285 @node Error Reporting
5286 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
5287 @cindex error reporting function
5290 @cindex syntax error
5292 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
5293 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
5294 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
5295 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
5298 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
5299 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
5300 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
5301 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
5302 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
5304 @findex %error-verbose
5305 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison
5306 declarations section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations
5307 Section}), then Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message
5308 string instead of just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
5310 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
5311 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
5312 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
5313 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
5314 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
5315 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
5317 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
5318 translated automatically from English to some other language before
5319 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
5321 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
5326 yyerror (char const *s)
5330 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
5335 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
5336 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
5337 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
5338 immediately return 1.
5340 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
5341 an access to the current location.
5342 This is indeed the case for the @acronym{GLR}
5343 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
5344 @samp{%locations %pure-parser} is passed then the prototypes for
5348 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5349 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5352 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
5355 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5356 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5359 Finally, @acronym{GLR} and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
5360 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
5361 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
5362 @code{%pure-parser} are pure. I.e.:
5365 /* Location tracking. */
5369 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5371 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5372 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5376 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
5379 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5380 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5381 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
5382 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
5387 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
5388 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
5389 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
5390 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
5391 message is always passed last.
5393 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
5394 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
5395 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
5399 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
5400 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
5401 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
5402 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
5404 @node Action Features
5405 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
5406 @cindex summary, action features
5407 @cindex action features summary
5409 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
5410 are useful in actions.
5412 @deffn {Variable} $$
5413 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
5414 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
5417 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
5418 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
5419 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
5422 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
5423 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
5424 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
5425 Types of Values in Actions}.
5428 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
5429 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
5430 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
5431 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
5434 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
5435 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
5436 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
5439 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
5440 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
5441 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
5444 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
5446 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
5447 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
5448 It is also disallowed in @acronym{GLR} parsers.
5449 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
5450 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
5451 going to be reduced by this rule.
5453 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
5454 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
5455 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
5458 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
5461 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
5463 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
5466 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
5468 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
5472 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
5474 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
5475 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
5476 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
5477 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
5478 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
5481 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
5482 @findex YYRECOVERING
5483 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
5484 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
5485 @xref{Error Recovery}.
5488 @deffn {Variable} yychar
5489 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
5490 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
5491 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
5492 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
5494 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
5497 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
5498 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
5500 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
5502 @xref{Error Recovery}.
5505 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
5506 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
5507 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
5508 @xref{Error Recovery}.
5511 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
5512 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
5513 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
5514 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
5516 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
5519 @deffn {Variable} yylval
5520 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
5521 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
5522 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
5524 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
5529 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
5530 of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
5531 Tracking Locations}.
5533 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
5537 @c int first_line, last_line;
5538 @c int first_column, last_column;
5542 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
5543 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
5545 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
5546 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
5547 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
5550 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5553 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
5555 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
5556 of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
5557 Tracking Locations}.
5560 @node Internationalization
5561 @section Parser Internationalization
5562 @cindex internationalization
5568 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
5569 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
5570 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
5571 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
5572 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
5573 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
5574 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the @acronym{UTF}-8
5575 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
5578 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
5579 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
5580 steps. Here we assume a package that uses @acronym{GNU} Autoconf and
5581 @acronym{GNU} Automake.
5585 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
5586 Into the directory containing the @acronym{GNU} Autoconf macros used
5587 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
5588 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
5589 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
5593 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
5598 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
5599 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
5600 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
5601 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
5602 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
5603 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
5604 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
5605 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
5606 Bison-generated parser.
5609 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
5610 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
5611 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
5615 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
5618 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
5619 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
5620 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
5624 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
5625 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
5626 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
5629 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
5635 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
5639 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
5645 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
5646 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
5647 @cindex algorithm of parser
5650 @cindex parser stack
5651 @cindex stack, parser
5653 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
5654 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
5655 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
5657 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
5658 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
5661 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
5662 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
5663 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
5664 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
5665 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
5666 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
5667 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
5669 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
5676 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
5677 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
5680 expr: expr '*' expr;
5684 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
5691 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
5692 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
5694 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
5695 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
5696 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
5698 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
5701 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
5702 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
5703 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
5704 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
5705 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
5706 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
5707 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
5708 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
5709 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
5713 @section Lookahead Tokens
5714 @cindex lookahead token
5716 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
5717 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
5718 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
5719 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
5720 token in order to decide what to do.
5722 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
5723 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
5724 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
5725 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
5726 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
5727 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
5728 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
5731 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
5732 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
5733 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
5750 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
5751 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
5752 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
5753 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
5754 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
5756 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
5757 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
5758 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
5759 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
5760 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
5761 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
5766 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
5767 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
5768 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
5769 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
5772 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
5774 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
5775 @cindex dangling @code{else}
5776 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
5778 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
5779 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
5785 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
5791 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
5792 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
5794 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
5795 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
5796 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
5797 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
5800 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
5801 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
5802 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
5803 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
5804 contrast it with the other alternative.
5806 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
5807 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
5811 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
5813 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
5816 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
5817 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
5818 making these two inputs equivalent:
5821 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
5823 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
5826 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
5827 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
5828 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
5829 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
5830 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
5831 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
5832 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
5833 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
5835 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
5836 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration. There will be no
5837 warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts is exactly @var{n}.
5838 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
5840 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
5841 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
5842 rules. Here is a complete Bison input file that actually manifests the
5847 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
5859 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
5868 @section Operator Precedence
5869 @cindex operator precedence
5870 @cindex precedence of operators
5872 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
5873 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
5874 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
5875 shift and when to reduce.
5878 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
5879 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
5880 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
5881 * How Precedence:: How they work.
5884 @node Why Precedence
5885 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
5887 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
5888 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
5902 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
5903 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
5904 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
5905 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
5906 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
5907 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
5908 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
5911 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
5912 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
5913 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
5914 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
5915 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
5916 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
5917 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
5918 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
5921 @cindex associativity
5922 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
5923 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
5924 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
5925 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
5926 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
5927 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
5928 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
5929 makes right-associativity.
5931 @node Using Precedence
5932 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
5937 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
5938 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
5939 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
5940 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
5941 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
5942 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
5943 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
5946 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
5947 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
5948 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
5949 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
5950 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
5952 @node Precedence Examples
5953 @subsection Precedence Examples
5955 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
5963 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
5964 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
5965 declared with @code{'-'}:
5968 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
5974 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
5975 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
5976 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
5978 @node How Precedence
5979 @subsection How Precedence Works
5981 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
5982 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
5983 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
5984 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
5985 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
5986 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
5988 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
5989 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
5990 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
5991 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
5992 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
5993 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
5994 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
5997 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
5998 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6000 @node Contextual Precedence
6001 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6002 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6003 @cindex unary operator precedence
6004 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6005 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6008 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6009 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6010 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6011 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6013 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6014 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6015 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6016 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6019 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6020 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6021 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6022 modifier's syntax is:
6025 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6029 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6030 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6031 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6032 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6033 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6035 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6036 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6037 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6047 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6054 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6059 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6060 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6061 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6062 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6064 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6065 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6066 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6067 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6069 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6070 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6071 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6072 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6073 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6074 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6076 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6077 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6081 @section Parser States
6082 @cindex finite-state machine
6083 @cindex parser state
6084 @cindex state (of parser)
6086 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6087 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6088 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6089 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6090 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6092 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6093 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6094 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6095 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6096 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6097 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6098 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6099 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6102 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6103 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6104 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6107 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6108 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6109 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6111 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6112 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6115 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6116 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6119 sequence: /* empty */
6120 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6123 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6126 maybeword: /* empty */
6127 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6129 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6134 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6135 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6136 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6137 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6138 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6139 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6141 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6142 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6143 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6145 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6146 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6147 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6148 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6149 In this example, the output of the program changes.
6151 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6152 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6153 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6154 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6157 sequence: /* empty */
6158 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6160 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6164 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6167 sequence: /* empty */
6169 | sequence redirects
6176 redirects:/* empty */
6177 | redirects redirect
6182 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6183 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6184 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6185 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6186 in infinitely many ways!
6188 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6189 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6190 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6191 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6193 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6197 sequence: /* empty */
6203 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6207 sequence: /* empty */
6209 | sequence redirects
6217 | redirects redirect
6221 @node Mystery Conflicts
6222 @section Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6224 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
6232 def: param_spec return_spec ','
6236 | name_list ':' type
6254 | name ',' name_list
6259 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
6260 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
6261 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
6262 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is @acronym{LR}(1).
6264 @cindex @acronym{LR}(1)
6265 @cindex @acronym{LALR}(1)
6266 However, Bison, like most parser generators, cannot actually handle all
6267 @acronym{LR}(1) grammars. In this grammar, two contexts, that after
6269 at the beginning of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of
6270 a @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
6271 same. They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
6272 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
6273 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
6274 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
6275 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
6276 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
6277 occurrence means that the grammar is not @acronym{LALR}(1).
6279 In general, it is better to fix deficiencies than to document them. But
6280 this particular deficiency is intrinsically hard to fix; parser
6281 generators that can handle @acronym{LR}(1) grammars are hard to write
6283 produce parsers that are very large. In practice, Bison is more useful
6286 When the problem arises, you can often fix it by identifying the two
6287 parser states that are being confused, and adding something to make them
6288 look distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
6289 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
6300 /* This rule is never used. */
6306 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
6307 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
6308 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
6309 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
6310 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
6311 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
6313 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
6314 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
6315 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
6316 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
6317 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
6318 rather than the one for @code{name}.
6323 | name_list ':' type
6331 For a more detailed exposition of @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers and parser
6332 generators, please see:
6333 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of
6334 @acronym{LALR}(1) Look-Ahead Sets, @cite{@acronym{ACM} Transactions on
6335 Programming Languages and Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982),
6336 pp.@: 615--649 @uref{http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/69622.357187}.
6338 @node Generalized LR Parsing
6339 @section Generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) Parsing
6340 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
6341 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
6342 @cindex ambiguous grammars
6343 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
6345 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
6346 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
6347 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
6348 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
6349 context-free languages.
6350 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
6351 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
6352 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
6353 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
6354 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
6355 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mystery Conflicts}),
6356 there are languages where Bison's particular choice of how to
6357 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
6359 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
6360 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
6361 Generalized @acronym{LR} (or @acronym{GLR}). A Bison @acronym{GLR}
6362 parser uses the same basic
6363 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
6364 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
6365 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
6366 reduce-reduce conflict. When a @acronym{GLR} parser encounters such a
6368 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
6369 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
6370 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
6371 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
6372 a Bison @acronym{GLR} parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
6374 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
6375 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
6376 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
6377 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
6378 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
6379 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
6380 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
6381 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
6382 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
6383 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
6384 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
6387 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
6388 states to having one, it reverts to the normal @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing
6389 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
6390 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
6391 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
6392 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
6393 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
6394 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
6395 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
6396 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
6397 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
6398 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
6400 It is possible to use a data structure for the @acronym{GLR} parsing tree that
6401 permits the processing of any @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar in linear time (in the
6402 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
6403 @acronym{LALR}(1)) grammar in
6404 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
6405 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
6406 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
6407 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
6408 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
6409 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
6410 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
6411 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
6412 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
6413 structure should generally be adequate. On @acronym{LALR}(1) portions of a
6414 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the default
6417 For a more detailed exposition of @acronym{GLR} parsers, please see: Elizabeth
6418 Scott, Adrian Johnstone and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain, Tomita-Style
6419 Generalised @acronym{LR} Parsers, Royal Holloway, University of
6420 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12,
6421 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps},
6424 @node Memory Management
6425 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
6426 @cindex memory exhaustion
6427 @cindex memory management
6428 @cindex stack overflow
6429 @cindex parser stack overflow
6430 @cindex overflow of parser stack
6432 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
6433 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
6434 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
6436 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
6437 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
6438 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
6441 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
6442 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
6443 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
6444 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
6446 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
6447 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
6448 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
6449 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
6450 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
6451 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
6453 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
6454 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
6455 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
6458 @cindex default stack limit
6459 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
6463 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
6464 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the C
6465 @acronym{LALR}(1) parser, this value must be a compile-time constant
6466 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
6467 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
6469 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
6471 @c FIXME: C++ output.
6472 Because of semantical differences between C and C++, the
6473 @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
6474 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
6475 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
6476 this deficiency in a future release.
6478 @node Error Recovery
6479 @chapter Error Recovery
6480 @cindex error recovery
6481 @cindex recovery from errors
6483 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
6484 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
6485 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
6488 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
6489 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
6490 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
6491 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
6492 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
6493 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
6494 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
6497 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
6498 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
6499 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
6500 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
6501 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
6502 in the current context, the parse can continue.
6507 stmnts: /* empty string */
6513 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
6514 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
6516 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
6517 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
6518 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
6519 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
6520 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
6521 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
6522 applicable in the ordinary way.
6524 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
6525 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
6526 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
6527 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
6528 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
6529 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
6530 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
6531 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
6532 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
6533 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
6534 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
6535 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
6537 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
6538 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
6539 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
6542 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
6545 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
6546 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
6547 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
6548 spurious error message:
6551 primary: '(' expr ')'
6557 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
6558 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
6559 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
6560 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
6561 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
6562 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
6563 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
6566 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
6567 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
6568 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
6569 error messages resume.
6571 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
6572 as any other rules can.
6575 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
6576 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
6577 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
6578 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
6581 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
6582 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
6583 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
6585 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6587 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
6588 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
6589 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
6590 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
6591 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
6593 @vindex YYRECOVERING
6594 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6595 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6596 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
6599 @node Context Dependency
6600 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
6602 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
6603 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
6604 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
6605 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
6609 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
6610 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
6611 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
6612 error recovery rules must be written.
6615 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
6616 neither clean nor robust.)
6618 @node Semantic Tokens
6619 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
6621 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
6622 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
6628 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
6629 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
6630 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
6632 The method used in @acronym{GNU} C is to have two different token types,
6633 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
6634 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
6635 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
6636 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
6638 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
6639 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
6640 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
6641 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
6642 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
6643 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
6644 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
6646 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
6647 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
6648 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
6649 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
6653 typedef int foo, bar;
6656 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
6657 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
6662 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
6663 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
6665 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
6666 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
6667 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
6668 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
6669 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
6673 declarator maybeasm '='
6675 | declarator maybeasm
6679 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
6681 | notype_declarator maybeasm
6686 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
6687 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
6688 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
6690 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
6691 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
6692 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
6693 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
6694 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
6695 the syntactic context.
6697 @node Lexical Tie-ins
6698 @section Lexical Tie-ins
6699 @cindex lexical tie-in
6701 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
6702 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
6705 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
6706 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
6707 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
6708 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
6709 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
6716 void yyerror (char const *);
6730 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
6744 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
6745 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
6746 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
6748 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the parser file
6749 is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue, ,The Prologue}).
6750 You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey the flag.
6752 @node Tie-in Recovery
6753 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
6755 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
6756 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6758 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
6759 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
6760 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
6761 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
6765 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
6772 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
6773 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
6774 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
6775 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
6776 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
6778 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
6780 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
6781 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
6782 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
6794 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
6795 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
6796 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
6797 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
6799 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
6800 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
6801 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
6802 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
6803 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
6804 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
6807 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
6810 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
6812 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
6813 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
6814 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
6815 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
6816 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
6817 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
6820 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
6821 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
6825 @section Understanding Your Parser
6827 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
6828 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
6829 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
6830 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
6831 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
6833 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
6834 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
6835 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
6836 the parser output file name, and adding @samp{.output} instead.
6837 Therefore, if the input file is @file{foo.y}, then the parser file is
6838 called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As a consequence, the verbose
6839 output file is called @file{foo.output}.
6841 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
6858 @command{bison} reports:
6861 calc.y: warning: 1 useless nonterminal and 1 useless rule
6862 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: useless nonterminal: useless
6863 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: useless rule: useless: STR
6864 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
6867 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
6868 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
6869 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
6870 interpretation is the same.
6872 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
6873 to precedence and/or associativity:
6876 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
6877 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
6878 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
6883 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
6886 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
6887 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
6888 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
6889 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
6893 @cindex token, useless
6894 @cindex useless token
6895 @cindex nonterminal, useless
6896 @cindex useless nonterminal
6897 @cindex rule, useless
6898 @cindex useless rule
6899 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
6900 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
6901 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
6902 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``not used''
6906 Useless nonterminals:
6909 Terminals which are not used:
6917 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
6923 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
6924 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
6925 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
6926 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
6927 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
6932 and reports the uses of the symbols:
6935 Terminals, with rules where they appear
6945 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
6950 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
6955 @cindex pointed rule
6956 @cindex rule, pointed
6957 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
6958 with it set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
6959 item is a production rule together with a point (marked by @samp{.})
6960 that the input cursor.
6965 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
6967 NUM shift, and go to state 1
6972 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
6973 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
6974 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
6975 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
6976 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
6977 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted on
6978 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
6979 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
6981 @cindex core, item set
6982 @cindex item set core
6983 @cindex kernel, item set
6984 @cindex item set core
6985 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
6986 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
6987 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
6988 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
6989 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
6990 @option{--report=itemset} to list all the items, include those that can
6996 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
6997 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
6998 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
6999 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
7000 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
7001 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
7003 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7014 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
7016 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
7020 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
7021 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
7022 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
7023 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
7028 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
7029 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7030 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7031 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7032 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7034 $ shift, and go to state 3
7035 '+' shift, and go to state 4
7036 '-' shift, and go to state 5
7037 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7038 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7042 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
7043 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead if
7044 @samp{+}, it will be shifted on the parse stack, and the automaton
7045 control will jump to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp
7046 '+' . exp}. Since there is no default action, any other token than
7047 those listed above will trigger a syntax error.
7049 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
7055 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
7061 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
7062 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
7064 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
7070 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
7072 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7078 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
7080 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7086 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
7088 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7094 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
7096 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7101 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
7107 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7108 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
7109 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7110 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7111 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7113 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7114 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7116 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
7117 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
7120 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
7121 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
7122 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
7123 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
7124 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
7125 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
7126 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
7127 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
7129 Because in @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
7130 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7131 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
7134 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
7135 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
7136 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
7137 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
7138 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
7139 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
7140 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
7141 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
7142 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
7143 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
7144 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
7145 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
7150 exp -> exp . '+' exp [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
7151 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
7152 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7153 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7154 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7156 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7157 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7159 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
7160 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
7163 The remaining states are similar:
7168 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7169 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7170 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
7171 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7172 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7174 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7175 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7177 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
7178 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
7182 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7183 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7184 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7185 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
7186 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7188 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7190 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
7191 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
7195 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7196 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7197 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7198 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7199 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
7201 '+' shift, and go to state 4
7202 '-' shift, and go to state 5
7203 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7204 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7206 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7207 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7208 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7209 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7210 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
7214 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
7215 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
7216 @samp{*}, but also because the
7217 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
7221 @section Tracing Your Parser
7224 @cindex tracing the parser
7226 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
7227 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
7229 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
7232 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
7234 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
7235 parser. This is compliant with @acronym{POSIX} Yacc. You could use
7236 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
7237 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
7240 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
7241 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
7242 ,Invoking Bison}). This is @acronym{POSIX} compliant too.
7244 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
7246 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
7247 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
7248 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
7249 preprocessor. Unless @acronym{POSIX} and Yacc portability matter to
7251 the preferred solution.
7254 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
7257 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
7258 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
7259 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
7260 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
7261 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
7262 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
7264 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
7265 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
7266 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
7267 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
7269 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
7270 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
7271 messages tell you these things:
7275 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
7278 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
7279 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
7282 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
7283 of the state stack afterward.
7286 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
7287 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
7288 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
7289 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
7290 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
7291 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
7292 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
7293 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
7294 grammar are to blame.
7296 The parser file is a C program and you can use C debuggers on it, but it's
7297 not easy to interpret what it is doing. The parser function is a
7298 finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from the actions it executes
7299 the same code over and over. Only the values of variables show where in
7300 the grammar it is working.
7303 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
7304 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
7305 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
7306 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
7307 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
7308 value (from @code{yylval}).
7310 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
7311 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Decl, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
7315 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
7316 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
7319 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
7322 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
7325 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
7326 else if (type == NUM)
7327 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
7331 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
7334 @chapter Invoking Bison
7335 @cindex invoking Bison
7336 @cindex Bison invocation
7337 @cindex options for invoking Bison
7339 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
7345 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
7346 @samp{.y}. The parser file's name is made by replacing the @samp{.y}
7347 with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory. Thus, the
7348 @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields
7349 @file{foo.tab.c}, and the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields
7350 @file{foo.tab.c}. It's also possible, in case you are writing
7351 C++ code instead of C in your grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp}
7352 or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the output files will take an extension like
7353 the given one as input (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and
7354 @file{foo.tab.c++}).
7355 This feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
7356 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
7361 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
7364 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
7367 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
7370 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
7372 For compatibility with @acronym{POSIX}, the standard Bison
7373 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
7374 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
7377 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
7378 in alphabetical order by short options.
7379 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
7380 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
7384 @section Bison Options
7386 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
7387 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
7388 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
7389 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
7390 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
7393 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
7394 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
7397 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
7403 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
7407 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
7409 @item --print-localedir
7410 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
7414 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause
7415 different diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in
7416 other minor ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output
7417 file name conventions, so that the parser output file is called
7418 @file{y.tab.c}, and the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and
7420 Also, if generating an @acronym{LALR}(1) parser in C, generate @code{#define}
7421 statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate token numbers with token
7423 Thus, the following shell script can substitute for Yacc, and the Bison
7424 distribution contains such a script for compatibility with @acronym{POSIX}:
7431 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
7432 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
7433 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
7434 this option is specified.
7444 In the parser file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 if it is not
7445 already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
7446 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
7448 @item -L @var{language}
7449 @itemx --language=@var{language}
7450 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
7451 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
7452 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C and C++.
7453 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
7456 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7458 @item -p @var{prefix}
7459 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
7460 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
7461 @xref{Decl Summary}.
7465 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser file.
7466 Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser file so that the C compiler
7467 and debuggers will associate errors with your source file, the
7468 grammar file. This option causes them to associate errors with the
7469 parser file, treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
7473 Pretend that @code{%no-parser} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7476 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
7477 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
7478 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
7480 You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
7481 You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
7482 different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
7483 choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
7485 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
7486 file in the Bison installation directory.
7487 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
7488 current working directory.
7489 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
7492 @itemx --token-table
7493 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7502 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
7503 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
7504 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7506 @item --defines=@var{defines-file}
7507 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
7509 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
7510 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
7511 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
7512 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7514 @item -r @var{things}
7515 @itemx --report=@var{things}
7516 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
7517 separated list of @var{things} among:
7521 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
7522 @acronym{LALR} automaton.
7525 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
7526 each rule's lookahead set.
7529 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
7530 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
7535 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
7536 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
7537 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7540 @itemx --output=@var{file}
7541 Specify the @var{file} for the parser file.
7543 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
7544 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
7547 Output a graphical representation of the @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar
7548 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
7549 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, @acronym{DOT}} format.
7550 If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will
7553 @item --graph=@var{graph-file}
7554 The behavior of @var{--graph} is the same than @samp{-g}. The only
7555 difference is that it has an optional argument which is the name of
7556 the output graph file.
7559 @node Option Cross Key
7560 @section Option Cross Key
7562 @c FIXME: How about putting the directives too?
7563 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
7564 the corresponding short option.
7566 @multitable {@option{--defines=@var{defines-file}}} {@option{-b @var{file-prefix}XXX}}
7567 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option
7568 @item @option{--debug} @tab @option{-t}
7569 @item @option{--defines=@var{defines-file}} @tab @option{-d}
7570 @item @option{--file-prefix=@var{prefix}} @tab @option{-b @var{file-prefix}}
7571 @item @option{--graph=@var{graph-file}} @tab @option{-d}
7572 @item @option{--help} @tab @option{-h}
7573 @item @option{--name-prefix=@var{prefix}} @tab @option{-p @var{name-prefix}}
7574 @item @option{--no-lines} @tab @option{-l}
7575 @item @option{--no-parser} @tab @option{-n}
7576 @item @option{--output=@var{outfile}} @tab @option{-o @var{outfile}}
7577 @item @option{--print-localedir} @tab
7578 @item @option{--token-table} @tab @option{-k}
7579 @item @option{--verbose} @tab @option{-v}
7580 @item @option{--version} @tab @option{-V}
7581 @item @option{--yacc} @tab @option{-y}
7585 @section Yacc Library
7587 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
7588 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
7589 implementations are normally not useful, but @acronym{POSIX} requires
7590 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
7591 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
7592 library is distributed under the terms of the @acronym{GNU} General
7593 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
7595 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
7596 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
7599 int yyerror (char const *);
7602 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
7603 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
7604 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
7610 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
7612 @node Other Languages
7613 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
7616 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
7617 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
7621 @section C++ Parsers
7624 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
7625 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
7626 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
7627 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
7628 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
7629 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
7632 @node C++ Bison Interface
7633 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
7634 @c - %language "C++"
7638 The C++ @acronym{LALR}(1) parser is selected using the language directive,
7639 @samp{%language "C++"}, or the synonymous command-line option
7640 @option{--language=c++}.
7641 @xref{Decl Summary}.
7643 When run, @command{bison} will create several
7644 entities in the @samp{yy} namespace. Use the @samp{%name-prefix}
7645 directive to change the namespace name, see @ref{Decl Summary}. The
7646 various classes are generated in the following files:
7651 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
7652 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
7655 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
7658 @itemx @var{file}.cc
7659 (Assuming the extension of the input file was @samp{.yy}.) The
7660 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
7661 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
7662 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
7664 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
7665 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
7666 @samp{%defines} directive.
7669 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
7670 for a complete and accurate documentation.
7672 @node C++ Semantic Values
7673 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
7674 @c - No objects in unions
7676 @c - Printer and destructor
7678 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
7679 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
7680 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
7681 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
7682 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
7685 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
7686 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
7687 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
7689 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
7690 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
7691 to such objects are allowed.
7694 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
7695 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
7696 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
7700 @node C++ Location Values
7701 @subsection C++ Location Values
7705 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
7707 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
7708 location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}. Two
7709 auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point in a file,
7710 and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
7711 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files).
7713 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
7714 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
7715 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
7716 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
7717 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
7720 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
7721 The line, starting at 1.
7724 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
7725 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
7728 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
7729 The column, starting at 0.
7732 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
7733 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
7736 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
7737 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
7738 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
7739 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
7740 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
7743 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
7744 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
7745 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
7746 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
7749 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
7750 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
7751 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
7754 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
7755 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
7756 Advance the @code{end} position.
7759 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
7760 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
7761 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
7762 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
7765 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
7766 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
7770 @node C++ Parser Interface
7771 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
7772 @c - define parser_class_name
7774 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
7776 @c - Reporting errors
7778 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
7779 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
7780 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
7781 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
7782 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
7783 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
7784 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
7785 additional argument for its constructor.
7787 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_value_type}
7788 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_value_type}
7789 The types for semantics value and locations.
7792 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
7793 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
7794 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
7797 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
7798 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
7801 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
7802 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
7803 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
7807 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
7808 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
7809 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
7810 or nonzero, full tracing.
7813 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
7814 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
7815 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
7816 described by @var{m}.
7820 @node C++ Scanner Interface
7821 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
7822 @c - prefix for yylex.
7823 @c - Pure interface to yylex
7826 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
7827 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
7828 @code{%pure-parser} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
7830 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_value_type& @var{yylval}, location_type& @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
7831 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
7832 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
7833 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
7837 @node A Complete C++ Example
7838 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
7840 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
7841 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
7842 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
7843 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
7844 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
7845 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
7846 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
7847 actually easier to interface with.
7850 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
7851 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
7852 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
7853 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
7854 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
7857 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
7858 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
7860 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
7861 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
7862 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
7863 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
7864 of valid input follows.
7868 seven := one + two * three
7872 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
7873 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
7875 @c - A place to store error messages
7876 @c - A place for the result
7878 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
7879 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
7880 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
7881 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
7882 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
7883 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
7884 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
7886 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
7887 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
7888 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
7891 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7893 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
7894 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
7897 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
7902 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
7903 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
7904 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
7905 factor both as follows.
7907 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7909 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
7911 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
7912 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
7913 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
7914 calcxx_driver& driver)
7915 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
7920 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
7923 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7925 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
7930 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
7932 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
7938 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
7939 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
7941 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7943 // Handling the scanner.
7946 bool trace_scanning;
7950 Similarly for the parser itself.
7952 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7954 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
7955 int parse (const std::string& f);
7961 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
7962 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
7963 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
7964 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
7966 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
7969 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
7970 void error (const std::string& m);
7972 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
7975 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
7976 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
7977 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
7978 messages and set error state.
7980 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
7982 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
7983 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
7985 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
7986 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
7988 variables["one"] = 1;
7989 variables["two"] = 2;
7992 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
7997 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
8001 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
8002 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
8003 int res = parser.parse ();
8009 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
8011 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
8015 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
8017 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
8022 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
8024 The parser definition file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for
8025 the C++ LALR(1) skeleton, the creation of the parser header file, and
8026 specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
8027 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
8030 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8032 %language "C++" /* -*- C++ -*- */
8033 %require "@value{VERSION}"
8035 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
8039 @findex %code requires
8040 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
8041 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
8042 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
8043 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
8044 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
8045 use a forward declaration of the driver.
8046 @xref{Decl Summary, ,%code}.
8048 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8052 class calcxx_driver;
8057 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
8058 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
8061 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8063 // The parsing context.
8064 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
8065 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
8069 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
8070 first location's file name. Afterwards new locations are computed
8071 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
8072 automatically propagated.
8074 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8079 // Initialize the initial location.
8080 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
8085 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose
8088 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8095 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
8098 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8110 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
8111 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
8113 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8116 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
8122 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
8123 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
8124 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
8125 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
8128 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8130 %token END 0 "end of file"
8132 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
8133 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
8138 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
8141 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
8142 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8144 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
8145 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
8147 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <ival>
8151 The grammar itself is straightforward.
8153 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8157 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
8159 assignments: assignments assignment @{@}
8160 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
8163 "identifier" ":=" exp
8164 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
8168 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
8169 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
8170 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
8171 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
8172 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
8173 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
8178 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
8181 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8184 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
8185 const std::string& m)
8187 driver.error (l, m);
8191 @node Calc++ Scanner
8192 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
8194 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
8195 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
8197 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8199 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
8202 # include <limits.h>
8204 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
8205 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
8207 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
8208 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
8209 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
8210 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
8214 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
8215 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
8216 not of token_type. */
8217 #define yyterminate() return token::END
8222 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
8223 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
8224 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
8225 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
8227 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8229 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
8233 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
8235 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8237 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
8243 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
8244 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
8245 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
8246 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
8247 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
8248 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
8249 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
8251 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8254 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
8260 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
8261 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
8265 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
8266 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
8267 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
8268 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
8270 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8273 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
8275 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
8276 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
8277 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
8280 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
8281 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
8282 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
8284 return token::NUMBER;
8286 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
8287 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
8292 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
8293 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
8295 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8298 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
8300 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
8303 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
8305 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file);
8311 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
8317 @node Calc++ Top Level
8318 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
8320 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
8322 @comment file: calc++.cc
8325 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
8328 main (int argc, char *argv[])
8330 calcxx_driver driver;
8331 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
8332 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
8333 driver.trace_parsing = true;
8334 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
8335 driver.trace_scanning = true;
8336 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
8337 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
8342 @section Java Parsers
8345 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
8346 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
8347 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
8348 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8349 * Java Scanner Interface:: Java scanners, and pure parsers
8350 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
8353 @node Java Bison Interface
8354 @subsection Java Bison Interface
8355 @c - %language "Java"
8358 The Java parser skeletons are selected using a language directive,
8359 @samp{%language "Java"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8360 @option{--language=java}.
8362 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities whose name
8363 starts with @samp{YY}. Use the @samp{%name-prefix} directive to
8364 change the prefix, see @ref{Decl Summary}; classes can be placed
8365 in an arbitrary Java package using a @samp{%define package} section.
8367 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
8368 for location tracking. If the parser is pure, it also defines an
8369 inner interface, @code{Lexer}; see~@ref{Java Scanner Interface} for the
8370 meaning of pure parsers when the Java language is chosen. Other than
8371 these inner class/interface, and the members described in~@ref{Java
8372 Parser Interface}, all the other members and fields are preceded
8373 with a @code{yy} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
8375 No header file can be generated for Java parsers; you must not pass
8376 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, nor use the
8377 @samp{%defines} directive.
8379 By default, the @samp{YYParser} class has package visibility. A
8380 declaration @samp{%define "public"} will change to public visibility.
8381 Remember that, according to the Java language specification, the name
8382 of the @file{.java} file should match the name of the class in this
8385 Similarly, a declaration @samp{%define "abstract"} will make your
8388 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
8390 @node Java Semantic Values
8391 @subsection Java Semantic Values
8392 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
8394 @c - Printer and destructor
8396 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
8397 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
8398 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
8401 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
8402 %type <Integer> number
8405 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
8406 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
8407 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
8408 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define} directive.
8409 For example, after the following declaration:
8412 %define "stype" "ASTNode"
8416 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
8417 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
8419 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
8420 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
8421 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
8423 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
8424 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
8425 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
8427 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
8428 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
8429 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
8432 @node Java Location Values
8433 @subsection Java Location Values
8438 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser
8439 supports location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
8440 An auxiliary user-defined class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point
8441 in a file; Bison itself defines a class representing a @dfn{location},
8442 a range composed of a pair of positions (possibly spanning several
8443 files). The location class is an inner class of the parser; the name
8444 is @code{Location} by default, may also be renamed using @code{%define
8445 "location_type" "@var{class-name}}.
8447 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
8448 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
8449 with @code{%define "position_type" "@var{class-name}"}.
8452 @deftypemethod {Location} {Position} begin
8453 @deftypemethodx {Location} {Position} end
8454 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8457 @deftypemethod {Location} {void} toString ()
8458 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
8459 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
8460 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
8464 @node Java Parser Interface
8465 @subsection Java Parser Interface
8466 @c - define parser_class_name
8468 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8470 @c - Reporting errors
8472 The output file defines the parser class in the package optionally
8473 indicated in the @code{%define package} section. The class name defaults
8474 to @code{YYParser}. The @code{YY} prefix may be changed using
8475 @samp{%name-prefix}; alternatively, you can use @samp{%define
8476 "parser_class_name" "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to the class.
8477 The interface of this class is detailed below. It can be extended using
8478 the @code{%parse-param} directive; each occurrence of the directive will
8479 add a field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor.
8481 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8482 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
8483 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
8486 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
8487 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
8488 @code{false} otherwise.
8491 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
8492 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
8493 from a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
8496 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
8497 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
8498 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
8502 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
8503 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
8504 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
8505 or nonzero, full tracing.
8508 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} error (Location @var{l}, String @var{m})
8509 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user
8510 in the same way as the scanner interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
8511 Interface}); the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at
8512 @var{l}, described by @var{m}.
8516 @node Java Scanner Interface
8517 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
8520 @c - Lexer interface
8522 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
8523 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
8524 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
8525 directive does not do anything when used in Java.
8527 The scanner always resides in a separate class than the parser.
8528 Still, Java also two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java
8529 parser with a scanner, that is, the scanner may reside in a separate file
8530 than the Bison grammar, or in the same file. The interface
8531 to the scanner is similar in the two cases.
8533 In the first case, where the scanner in the same file as the grammar, the
8534 scanner code has to be placed in @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want
8535 to pass parameters from the parser constructor to the scanner constructor,
8536 specify them with @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before
8537 @code{%parse-param}s to the constructor.
8539 In the second case, the scanner has to implement interface @code{Lexer},
8540 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
8541 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
8542 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
8545 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
8547 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{l}, String @var{m})
8548 As explained in @pxref{Java Parser Interface}, this method is defined
8549 by the user to emit an error message. The first parameter is omitted
8550 if location tracking is not active. Its type can be changed using
8551 @samp{%define "location_type" "@var{class-name}".}
8554 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8555 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8556 value and location are saved and returned by the ther methods in the
8557 interface. Invocations of @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1}
8558 @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
8561 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
8562 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
8563 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
8564 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
8565 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
8567 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define "position_type"
8568 "@var{class-name}".}
8571 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
8572 Return respectively the first position of the last token that yylex
8573 returned, and the first position beyond it.
8575 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define "stype"
8576 "@var{class-name}".}
8580 If @code{%pure-parser} is not specified, the lexer interface
8581 resides in the same class (@code{YYParser}) as the Bison-generated
8582 parser. The fields and methods that are provided to
8583 this end are as follows.
8585 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} error (Location @var{l}, String @var{m})
8586 As explained in @pxref{Java Parser Interface}, this method is defined
8587 by the user to emit an error message. The first parameter is not used
8588 unless location tracking is active. Its type can be changed using
8589 @samp{%define "location_type" "@var{class-name}".}
8592 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} yylex (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8593 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8594 value and location are saved into @code{yylval}, @code{yystartpos},
8595 @code{yyendpos}. Invocations of @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1}
8596 @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
8599 @deftypecv {Field} {YYParser} Position yystartpos
8600 @deftypecvx {Field} {YYParser} Position yyendpos
8601 Contain respectively the first position of the last token that yylex
8602 returned, and the first position beyond it. These methods are not
8603 needed unless location tracking is active.
8605 The field's type can be changed using @samp{%define "position_type"
8606 "@var{class-name}".}
8609 @deftypecv {Field} {YYParser} Object yylval
8610 Return respectively the first position of the last token that yylex
8611 returned, and the first position beyond it.
8613 The field's type can be changed using @samp{%define "stype"
8614 "@var{class-name}".}
8617 @node Java Differences
8618 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
8620 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
8621 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
8622 section summarizes these differences.
8626 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
8627 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
8628 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
8629 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
8630 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
8631 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
8633 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
8634 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
8635 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
8636 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
8637 corresponds to these C macros.}.
8640 The prolog declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
8642 @item @code{%code imports}
8643 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
8644 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
8645 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
8647 @item unqualified @code{%code}
8648 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
8650 @item @code{%code lexer}
8651 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
8652 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
8653 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
8657 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
8658 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
8659 be used to define other classes used by the parser.
8662 @c ================================================= FAQ
8665 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
8666 @cindex frequently asked questions
8669 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
8673 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
8674 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
8675 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
8676 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
8677 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
8678 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison @acronym{POSIX} safe?
8679 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
8680 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
8681 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
8682 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
8683 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
8684 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
8687 @node Memory Exhausted
8688 @section Memory Exhausted
8691 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
8692 message. What can I do?
8695 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
8698 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
8699 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
8701 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
8702 following typical questions:
8705 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
8706 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
8707 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
8714 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
8715 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
8716 although I did specify I needed a @code{%pure-parser}.
8719 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
8720 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
8721 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
8722 demonstration, consider the following source file,
8723 @file{first-line.l}:
8731 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
8734 yyparse (char const *file)
8736 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
8739 /* One token only. */
8741 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
8756 If the file @file{input} contains
8764 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
8767 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
8768 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
8769 $ @kbd{./first-line}
8774 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
8775 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
8776 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
8777 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
8778 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
8779 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
8780 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
8781 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
8784 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
8785 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
8786 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
8787 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
8789 @node Strings are Destroyed
8790 @section Strings are Destroyed
8793 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
8794 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
8795 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
8798 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
8799 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
8800 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
8805 char *yylval = NULL;
8808 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
8814 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
8815 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
8816 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
8817 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
8822 If you compile and run this code, you get:
8825 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
8826 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
8827 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
8833 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
8834 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
8835 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
8836 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
8837 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
8838 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
8841 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
8842 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
8843 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
8848 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
8849 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
8852 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
8853 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
8856 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
8857 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
8858 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
8859 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
8860 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
8861 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
8862 execute simple instructions one after the others.
8864 @cindex abstract syntax tree
8865 @cindex @acronym{AST}
8866 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
8867 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
8868 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
8869 or @dfn{@acronym{AST}} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
8870 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
8871 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
8874 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
8875 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
8878 @node Multiple start-symbols
8879 @section Multiple start-symbols
8882 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
8883 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
8884 multiple entry points.
8887 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
8888 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
8889 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
8890 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
8894 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
8896 start: START_FOO foo
8900 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
8901 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
8903 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
8904 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
8905 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
8906 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
8907 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
8908 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
8909 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
8910 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
8918 int t = start_token;
8923 /* @r{The rules.} */
8927 @node Secure? Conform?
8928 @section Secure? Conform?
8931 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
8934 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
8935 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
8936 @acronym{POSIX} specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
8937 please send us a bug report.
8939 @node I can't build Bison
8940 @section I can't build Bison
8943 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
8944 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
8948 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
8949 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
8950 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
8951 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
8952 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
8953 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
8954 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
8957 @node Where can I find help?
8958 @section Where can I find help?
8961 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
8964 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
8965 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
8966 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
8967 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
8968 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
8969 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
8970 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
8971 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
8975 @section Bug Reports
8978 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
8981 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
8982 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
8983 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
8984 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
8985 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
8987 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
8988 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
8989 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
8990 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
8991 easier it will be to fix the bug.
8993 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
8994 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
8995 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
8996 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
8997 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
8998 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
9000 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
9001 send a bug report just because you can not provide a fix.
9003 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
9005 @node More Languages
9006 @section More Languages
9009 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
9010 favorite language here}?
9013 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
9014 languages; contributions are welcome.
9017 @section Beta Testing
9020 What is involved in being a beta tester?
9023 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
9024 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
9025 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
9026 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
9027 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
9028 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
9031 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
9032 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
9033 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
9034 systems are especially welcome.
9037 @section Mailing Lists
9040 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
9043 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
9045 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
9047 @node Table of Symbols
9048 @appendix Bison Symbols
9049 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
9050 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
9052 @deffn {Variable} @@$
9053 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
9054 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
9057 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
9058 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand
9059 side of the rule. @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
9062 @deffn {Variable} $$
9063 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
9067 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
9068 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
9069 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
9072 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
9073 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
9074 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
9075 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
9078 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
9079 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
9080 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied directly to
9081 the output file uninterpreted. Such code forms the prologue of the input
9082 file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
9086 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
9087 Comment delimiters, as in C.
9090 @deffn {Delimiter} :
9091 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
9095 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
9096 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
9099 @deffn {Delimiter} |
9100 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
9101 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
9104 @deffn {Directive} <*>
9105 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
9108 This feature is experimental.
9109 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
9112 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
9115 @deffn {Directive} <>
9116 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
9119 This feature is experimental.
9120 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
9123 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
9126 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
9127 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
9128 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
9129 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
9132 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
9133 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
9134 Insert @var{code} verbatim into output parser source.
9135 @xref{Decl Summary,,%code}.
9138 @deffn {Directive} %debug
9139 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9142 @deffn {Directive} %debug
9143 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9147 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
9148 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
9149 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
9154 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{define-variable}
9155 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} @var{value}
9156 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior.
9157 @xref{Decl Summary,,%define}.
9160 @deffn {Directive} %defines
9161 Bison declaration to create a header file meant for the scanner.
9162 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9165 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
9166 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
9167 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9170 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
9171 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
9172 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
9175 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
9176 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
9177 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
9178 @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
9181 @deffn {Symbol} $end
9182 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
9183 used in the grammar.
9186 @deffn {Symbol} error
9187 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
9188 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
9189 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
9190 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
9191 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
9192 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
9193 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
9194 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9197 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
9198 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
9199 when @code{yyerror} is called.
9202 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9203 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
9207 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
9208 Bison declaration to produce a @acronym{GLR} parser. @xref{GLR
9209 Parsers, ,Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
9212 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
9213 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
9216 @deffn {Directive} %language
9217 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
9218 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9221 @deffn {Directive} %left
9222 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
9223 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
9226 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
9227 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
9228 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
9232 @deffn {Directive} %merge
9233 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
9234 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
9235 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
9236 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
9239 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9240 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9244 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
9245 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
9246 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
9251 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
9252 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
9253 parser file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9256 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
9257 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
9258 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
9261 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
9262 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser file. @xref{Decl
9266 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
9267 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
9268 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
9269 Function @code{yyparse}}.
9272 @deffn {Directive} %prec
9273 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
9274 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
9277 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
9278 Bison declaration to request a pure (reentrant) parser.
9279 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
9282 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
9283 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
9284 Require a Version of Bison}.
9287 @deffn {Directive} %right
9288 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
9289 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
9292 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
9293 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
9294 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9297 @deffn {Directive} %start
9298 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
9302 @deffn {Directive} %token
9303 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
9304 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
9307 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
9308 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser file.
9309 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9312 @deffn {Directive} %type
9313 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
9314 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
9317 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
9318 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
9319 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
9323 @deffn {Directive} %union
9324 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
9325 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
9328 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
9329 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
9330 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
9331 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
9332 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
9334 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
9338 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
9339 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
9340 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
9341 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
9343 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
9347 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
9348 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
9349 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
9352 @deffn {Variable} yychar
9353 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
9354 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
9355 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
9356 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
9359 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
9360 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
9361 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
9364 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
9365 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
9366 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9369 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
9370 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
9371 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
9372 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9375 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
9376 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
9377 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
9380 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
9381 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
9382 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
9383 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
9384 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
9386 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
9390 @deffn {Function} yyerror
9391 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
9392 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
9393 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
9396 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
9397 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
9398 to request verbose, specific error message strings
9399 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
9400 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
9401 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred.
9404 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
9405 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
9406 @xref{Memory Management}.
9409 @deffn {Function} yylex
9410 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
9411 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
9415 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
9416 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
9417 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
9418 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
9419 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
9422 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
9423 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
9424 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
9425 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
9427 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
9429 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
9430 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
9431 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
9434 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
9435 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
9436 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
9439 @deffn {Variable} yylval
9440 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
9441 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
9442 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
9444 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
9445 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
9446 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
9449 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
9450 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
9454 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
9455 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
9456 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}.)
9457 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
9460 @deffn {Function} yyparse
9461 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
9462 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
9465 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
9466 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
9467 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
9468 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
9469 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
9472 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
9473 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
9474 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
9475 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
9478 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
9479 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the C
9480 @acronym{LALR}(1) parser needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
9481 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
9482 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
9483 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
9484 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
9486 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
9487 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
9488 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
9489 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
9490 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
9491 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
9492 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
9495 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
9496 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
9497 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
9505 @item Backus-Naur Form (@acronym{BNF}; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
9506 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
9507 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
9508 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
9509 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
9511 @item Context-free grammars
9512 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
9513 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
9514 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
9515 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
9518 @item Dynamic allocation
9519 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
9520 compile time or on entry to a function.
9523 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
9524 character string of length zero.
9526 @item Finite-state stack machine
9527 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
9528 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
9529 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
9530 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
9531 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
9532 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
9534 @item Generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR})
9535 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
9536 that are not @acronym{LALR}(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
9537 usual @acronym{LALR}(1)
9538 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
9539 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
9540 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
9541 @acronym{LR} Parsing}.
9544 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
9545 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
9546 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
9548 @item Infix operator
9549 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
9550 performs some operation.
9553 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
9555 @item Language construct
9556 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
9557 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
9558 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
9560 @item Left associativity
9561 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
9562 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
9563 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
9565 @item Left recursion
9566 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
9567 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
9570 @item Left-to-right parsing
9571 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
9572 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
9574 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
9575 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
9576 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
9578 @item Lexical tie-in
9579 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
9580 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
9582 @item Literal string token
9583 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
9585 @item Lookahead token
9586 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
9589 @item @acronym{LALR}(1)
9590 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
9591 generators) can handle; a subset of @acronym{LR}(1). @xref{Mystery
9592 Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}.
9594 @item @acronym{LR}(1)
9595 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
9596 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
9598 @item Nonterminal symbol
9599 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
9600 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
9601 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
9604 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
9605 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
9608 @item Postfix operator
9609 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
9610 performs some operation.
9613 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
9614 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
9618 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
9619 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
9620 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
9622 @item Reverse polish notation
9623 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
9625 @item Right recursion
9626 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
9627 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
9631 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
9632 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
9633 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
9636 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
9637 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
9638 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
9640 @item Single-character literal
9641 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
9642 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
9645 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
9646 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
9647 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
9648 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
9651 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
9652 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
9653 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
9656 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
9657 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
9660 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
9661 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
9662 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
9663 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
9665 @item Terminal symbol
9666 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
9667 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
9668 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
9671 @node Copying This Manual
9672 @appendix Copying This Manual
9675 * GNU Free Documentation License:: License for copying this manual.
9687 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout
9688 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex
9689 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry
9690 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa
9691 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc
9692 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Gen Comp Expr ltcalc mfcalc Decl Symtab yylex
9693 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref
9694 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex
9695 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge
9696 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG
9697 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit
9698 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok
9699 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln
9700 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym
9701 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof
9702 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum
9703 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype
9704 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs
9705 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES
9706 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param
9707 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP
9708 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword
9709 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH
9710 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype
9711 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args
9712 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill
9713 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll
9714 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST
9715 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex