1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
193 Outline of a Bison Grammar
195 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
201 Defining Language Semantics
203 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
227 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
228 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
229 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
230 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
231 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
232 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
233 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
235 Parser C-Language Interface
237 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
238 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
241 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
242 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
244 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
245 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
246 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
249 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
251 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
252 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
253 of the token it has read.
254 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
255 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
257 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
258 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
260 The Bison Parser Algorithm
262 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
263 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
264 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
265 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
266 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
267 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
268 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
269 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
270 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
271 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
275 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
276 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
277 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
278 * How Precedence:: How they work.
282 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
283 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
284 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
285 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
287 Handling Context Dependencies
289 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
290 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
291 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
292 error recovery rules must be written.
294 Debugging Your Parser
296 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
297 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
301 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
302 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
303 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
307 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
308 in alphabetical order by short options.
309 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
310 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
312 Parsers Written In Other Languages
314 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
315 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
319 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
320 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
321 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
322 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
323 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
324 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
328 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
329 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
331 A Complete C++ Example
333 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
334 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
335 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
336 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
337 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
341 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
342 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
343 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
344 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
345 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
346 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
347 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
348 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
350 Frequently Asked Questions
352 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
353 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
354 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
355 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
356 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
357 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
358 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
359 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
360 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
361 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
362 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
363 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
367 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
373 @unnumbered Introduction
376 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
377 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
378 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
379 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
380 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
381 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
382 calculators to complex programming languages.
384 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
385 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
386 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
387 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
388 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
391 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
392 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
393 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
394 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
397 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
398 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
399 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
400 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
401 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
402 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
405 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
408 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
410 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
411 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
412 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
413 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
414 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
416 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
418 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
419 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
420 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
421 License to all of the Bison source code.
423 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
424 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
425 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
426 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
427 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
428 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
429 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
431 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
432 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
433 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
434 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
435 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
436 using the other GNU tools.
438 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
439 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
440 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
441 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
445 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
446 @include gpl-3.0.texi
449 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
451 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
452 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
453 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
456 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
457 as mathematical ideas.
458 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
459 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
460 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
461 the name of an identifier, etc.).
462 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
463 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
464 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
465 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
466 how is the output used?
467 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
468 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
471 @node Language and Grammar
472 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
474 @cindex context-free grammar
475 @cindex grammar, context-free
476 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
477 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
478 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
479 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
480 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
481 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
482 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
483 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
487 @cindex Backus-Naur form
488 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
489 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
490 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
491 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
492 essentially machine-readable BNF.
494 @cindex LALR grammars
495 @cindex IELR grammars
497 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
498 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
499 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
500 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
501 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
502 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
503 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
504 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
505 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
506 Construction}, to learn how.
509 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
510 @cindex ambiguous grammars
511 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
513 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
514 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
515 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
516 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
517 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
518 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
519 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
520 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
521 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
522 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
523 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
524 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
525 possible parses of any given string is finite.
527 @cindex symbols (abstract)
529 @cindex syntactic grouping
530 @cindex grouping, syntactic
531 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
532 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
533 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
534 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
535 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
536 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
537 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
539 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
540 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
541 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
542 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
543 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
544 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
545 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
546 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
547 lexicography, not grammar.)
549 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
552 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
553 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
554 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
555 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
556 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
557 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
558 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
561 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
562 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
563 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
564 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
565 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
566 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
567 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
568 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
570 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
571 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
572 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
573 reads informally as follows:
576 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
581 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
585 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
586 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
587 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
588 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
591 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
592 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
593 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
594 not the start symbol.
596 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
597 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
598 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
599 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
600 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
601 reports a syntax error.
603 @node Grammar in Bison
604 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
605 @cindex Bison grammar
606 @cindex grammar, Bison
607 @cindex formal grammar
609 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
610 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
611 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
613 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
614 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
615 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
617 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
618 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
619 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
620 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
621 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
622 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
623 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
626 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
627 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
628 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
629 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
631 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
632 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
634 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
635 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
636 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
637 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
641 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
645 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
647 @node Semantic Values
648 @section Semantic Values
649 @cindex semantic value
650 @cindex value, semantic
652 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
653 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
654 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
655 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
656 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
659 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
660 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
661 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
662 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
663 ,Defining Language Semantics},
666 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
667 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
668 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
669 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
672 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
673 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
674 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
675 need to have any semantic value.)
677 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
678 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
679 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
680 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
681 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
682 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
684 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
685 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
686 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
687 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
688 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
690 @node Semantic Actions
691 @section Semantic Actions
692 @cindex semantic actions
693 @cindex actions, semantic
695 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
696 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
697 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
698 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
701 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
702 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
703 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
704 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
705 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
706 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
707 newly recognized larger expression.
709 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
713 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
717 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
718 from the values of the two subexpressions.
721 @section Writing GLR Parsers
723 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
726 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
727 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
729 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
730 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
731 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
732 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
733 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
734 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
735 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
736 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
737 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
739 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
740 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
741 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
742 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
743 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
744 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
745 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
746 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
747 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
748 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
749 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
750 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
751 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
752 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
753 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
754 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
755 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
756 identical set of symbols.
758 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
759 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
760 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
761 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
762 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
763 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
764 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
765 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
766 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
770 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
771 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
772 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
773 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
776 @node Simple GLR Parsers
777 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
778 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
779 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
783 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
784 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
786 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
787 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
788 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
790 Consider a problem that
791 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
792 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
795 type subrange = lo .. hi;
796 type enum = (a, b, c);
800 The original language standard allows only numeric
801 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
802 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
803 10206) and many other
804 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
805 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
809 type subrange = (a) .. b;
813 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
814 type with only one value:
821 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
822 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
824 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
825 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
826 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
827 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
828 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
829 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
830 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
831 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
833 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
834 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
835 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
836 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
839 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
840 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
841 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
842 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
843 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
844 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
847 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
848 use the GLR algorithm.
849 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
850 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
851 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
852 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
853 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
854 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
855 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
856 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
857 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
859 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
860 reports a syntax error as usual.
862 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
863 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
864 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
865 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
866 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
868 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
869 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
870 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
871 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
872 The present example contains only one conflict between two
873 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
874 cannot be nested. So the number of
875 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
876 and the parsing time is still linear.
878 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
879 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
882 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
892 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
921 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
922 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
923 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
924 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
931 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
932 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
933 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
942 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
943 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
944 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
945 notice when the parser splits.
947 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
948 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
949 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
950 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
951 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
952 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
953 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
954 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
955 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
956 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
957 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
958 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
959 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
962 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
963 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
964 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
965 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
966 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
967 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
969 @node Merging GLR Parses
970 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
971 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
972 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
976 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
978 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
983 #define YYSTYPE char const *
985 void yyerror (char const *);
999 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1008 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1009 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1010 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1011 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1012 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1016 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1017 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1018 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1019 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1023 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1024 | '(' declarator ')'
1029 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1030 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1037 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1038 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1039 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1040 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1041 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1042 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1043 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1044 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1045 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1046 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1047 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1048 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1049 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1050 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1052 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1053 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1054 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1055 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1056 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1057 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1058 The parser therefore prints
1061 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1064 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1065 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1072 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1073 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1074 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1075 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1076 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1077 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1078 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1079 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1080 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1081 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1087 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1088 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1089 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1090 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1095 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1096 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1101 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1105 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1113 with an accompanying forward declaration
1114 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1118 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1119 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1124 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1125 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1128 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1131 Bison requires that all of the
1132 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1133 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1134 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1135 the offending merge.
1137 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1138 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1140 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1141 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1142 the associated reduction.
1143 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1144 action in a GLR parser.
1147 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1149 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1151 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1152 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1153 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1154 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1155 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1156 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1157 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1158 influence syntax analysis.
1159 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1162 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1163 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1164 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1165 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1166 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1167 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1168 future versions of Bison.
1169 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1170 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1171 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1174 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1175 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1176 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1177 initiate error recovery.
1178 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1179 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1180 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1181 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1183 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1184 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1186 @node Compiler Requirements
1187 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1188 @cindex @code{inline}
1189 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1191 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1192 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1193 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1194 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1195 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1196 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1205 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1209 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1210 && ! defined inline)
1219 @cindex textual location
1220 @cindex location, textual
1222 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1223 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1224 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1225 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1227 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1228 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1229 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1230 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1233 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1234 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1235 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1238 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1239 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1240 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1241 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1242 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1243 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1244 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1247 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1248 @cindex Bison parser
1249 @cindex Bison utility
1250 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1253 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1254 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1255 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1256 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1257 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1258 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1259 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1262 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1263 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1264 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1267 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1268 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1269 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1270 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1271 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1272 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1273 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1275 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1276 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1277 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1278 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1279 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1280 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1281 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1282 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1283 C-Language Interface}.
1285 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1286 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1287 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1288 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1289 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1290 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1291 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1292 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1293 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1294 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1295 anything other than their usual meanings.
1297 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1298 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1299 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1300 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1301 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1302 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1303 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1304 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1305 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1308 @section Stages in Using Bison
1309 @cindex stages in using Bison
1312 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1313 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1317 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1318 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1319 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1320 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1321 sequence of C statements.
1324 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1325 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1326 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1327 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1330 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1333 Write error-reporting routines.
1336 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1337 must follow these steps:
1341 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1344 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1347 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1350 @node Grammar Layout
1351 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1352 @cindex grammar file
1354 @cindex format of grammar file
1355 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1357 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1358 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1365 @var{Bison declarations}
1374 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1375 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1377 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1378 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1379 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1380 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1381 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1382 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1384 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1385 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1386 semantic values of various symbols.
1388 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1391 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1392 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1393 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1397 @cindex simple examples
1398 @cindex examples, simple
1400 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1401 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1402 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1403 and a multi-function calculator. All
1404 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1406 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1407 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1408 source file to try them.
1411 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1412 a first example with no operator precedence.
1413 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1414 Operator precedence is introduced.
1415 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1416 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1417 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1418 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1419 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1423 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1424 @cindex reverse polish notation
1425 @cindex polish notation calculator
1426 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1427 @cindex calculator, simple
1429 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1430 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1431 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1432 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1434 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1435 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1438 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1439 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1440 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1441 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1442 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1443 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1444 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1447 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1448 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1450 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1451 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1454 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1457 #define YYSTYPE double
1460 void yyerror (char const *);
1465 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1468 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1469 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1471 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1472 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1473 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1474 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1475 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1476 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1477 which is a floating point number.
1479 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1480 function @code{pow}.
1482 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1483 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1484 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1485 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1488 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1489 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1490 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1491 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1492 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1493 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1494 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1495 type for numeric constants.
1498 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1500 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1513 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1520 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1521 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1522 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1523 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1524 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1525 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1531 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1532 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1533 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1534 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1535 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1538 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1539 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1540 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1542 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1543 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1544 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1545 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1546 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1547 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1556 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1558 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1567 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1568 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1569 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1570 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1571 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1573 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1574 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1575 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1576 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1577 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1578 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1580 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1581 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1582 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1583 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1586 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1587 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1588 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1591 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1593 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1598 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1602 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1603 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1604 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1605 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1606 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1607 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1608 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1610 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1611 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1612 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1613 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1614 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1617 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1619 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1620 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1621 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1622 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1627 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1628 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1633 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1634 equally well have written them separately:
1638 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1639 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1643 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1644 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1645 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1646 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1647 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1648 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1649 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1650 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1652 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1653 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1654 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1656 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1657 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1661 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1665 means the same thing as this:
1670 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1676 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1679 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1680 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1681 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1683 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1684 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1685 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1686 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1688 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1690 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1691 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1692 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1693 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1695 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1696 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1697 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1698 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1699 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1700 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1701 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1702 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1703 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1705 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1706 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1707 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1708 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1709 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1711 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1712 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1714 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1718 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1719 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1720 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1721 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1732 /* Skip white space. */
1733 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1737 /* Process numbers. */
1738 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1741 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1746 /* Return end-of-input. */
1749 /* Return a single char. */
1756 @subsection The Controlling Function
1757 @cindex controlling function
1758 @cindex main function in simple example
1760 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1761 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1762 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1775 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1776 @cindex error reporting routine
1778 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1779 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1780 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1781 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1782 here is the definition we will use:
1790 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1792 yyerror (char const *s)
1794 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1799 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1800 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1801 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1802 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1803 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1804 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1806 @node Rpcalc Generate
1807 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1808 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1810 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1811 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1812 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1813 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1814 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1815 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1817 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1818 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1820 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1821 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1828 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1829 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1830 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1831 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1832 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1833 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1834 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1836 @node Rpcalc Compile
1837 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1838 @cindex compiling the parser
1840 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1844 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1846 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1850 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1851 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1852 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1856 # @r{List files again.}
1858 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1862 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1863 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1869 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1871 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1875 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1877 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1882 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1883 @cindex infix notation calculator
1885 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1887 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1888 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1889 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1890 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1893 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1897 #define YYSTYPE double
1901 void yyerror (char const *);
1906 /* Bison declarations. */
1910 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1911 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1914 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1925 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1932 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1933 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1934 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1935 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1936 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1937 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1938 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1945 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1948 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1950 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1951 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1952 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1953 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1954 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1955 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1958 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1959 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1960 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1961 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1962 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1965 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1966 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1967 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1968 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1969 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1971 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1976 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1984 @node Simple Error Recovery
1985 @section Simple Error Recovery
1986 @cindex error recovery, simple
1988 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1989 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1990 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1991 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1992 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1993 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1995 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1996 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1997 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2003 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2004 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2009 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2010 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2011 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2012 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2013 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2014 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2015 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2016 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2019 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2020 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2021 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2022 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2023 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2024 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2027 @node Location Tracking Calc
2028 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2029 @cindex location tracking calculator
2030 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2031 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2033 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2034 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2035 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2036 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2040 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2041 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2042 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2045 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2046 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2048 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2049 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2052 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2058 void yyerror (char const *);
2061 /* Bison declarations. */
2069 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2073 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2074 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2075 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2076 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2077 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2078 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2079 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2083 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2085 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2086 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2087 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2088 from the new information.
2090 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2091 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2104 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2111 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2112 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2113 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2123 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2124 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2125 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2130 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2131 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2132 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2136 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2137 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2138 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2140 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2141 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2142 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2143 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2144 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2145 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2149 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2151 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2152 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2153 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2156 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2157 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2168 /* Skip white space. */
2169 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2170 ++yylloc.last_column;
2175 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2176 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2180 /* Process numbers. */
2184 ++yylloc.last_column;
2185 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2187 ++yylloc.last_column;
2188 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2195 /* Return end-of-input. */
2200 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2204 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2207 ++yylloc.last_column;
2213 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2214 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2215 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2216 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2218 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2219 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2220 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2221 controlling function:
2228 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2229 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2235 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2236 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2237 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2239 @node Multi-function Calc
2240 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2241 @cindex multi-function calculator
2242 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2243 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2245 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2246 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2247 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2248 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2249 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2251 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2252 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2253 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2254 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2255 functions whose syntax has this form:
2258 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2262 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2263 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2264 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2268 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2272 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2278 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2283 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2286 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2287 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2288 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2291 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2292 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2294 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2296 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2300 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2301 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2303 void yyerror (char const *);
2309 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2310 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2313 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2314 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2321 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2322 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2326 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2327 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2328 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2330 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2331 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2332 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2333 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2335 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2336 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2337 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2338 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2339 between angle brackets).
2341 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2342 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2343 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2344 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2345 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2346 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2349 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2351 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2352 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2353 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2355 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2357 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2368 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2369 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2376 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2377 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2378 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2379 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2380 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2381 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2382 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2383 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2384 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2385 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2388 /* End of grammar. */
2392 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2393 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2394 @cindex symbol table example
2396 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2397 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2398 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2399 requires some additional C functions for support.
2401 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2402 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2403 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2405 @comment file: calc.h
2408 /* Function type. */
2409 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2413 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2416 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2417 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2420 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2421 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2423 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2428 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2430 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2431 extern symrec *sym_table;
2433 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2434 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2438 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2439 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2440 @code{init_table} as well:
2442 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2447 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2449 yyerror (char const *s)
2459 double (*fnct) (double);
2464 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2477 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2482 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2487 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2489 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2490 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2505 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2506 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2508 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2509 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2510 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2511 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2512 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2513 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2515 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2517 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2518 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2522 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2524 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2525 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2526 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2527 ptr->type = sym_type;
2528 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2529 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2537 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2540 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2541 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2542 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2549 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2550 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2551 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2552 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2554 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2555 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2556 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2557 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2558 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2559 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2561 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2562 operators in @code{yylex}.
2564 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2576 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2577 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2585 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2586 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2589 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2595 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2598 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2599 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2600 static size_t length = 40;
2601 static char *symbuf = 0;
2607 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2613 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2617 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2619 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2621 /* Get another character. */
2626 while (isalnum (c));
2633 s = getsym (symbuf);
2635 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2640 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2646 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2647 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2648 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2650 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2653 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2655 yyerror (char const *s)
2657 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2663 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2666 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2667 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2668 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2676 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2677 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2678 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2686 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2689 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2690 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2691 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2694 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2695 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2699 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2701 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2702 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2704 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2705 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2708 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2709 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2710 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2711 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2712 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2713 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2714 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2715 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2716 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2719 @node Grammar Outline
2720 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2722 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2723 appropriate delimiters:
2730 @var{Bison declarations}
2739 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2740 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2741 continues until end of line.
2744 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2745 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2746 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2747 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2748 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2752 @subsection The prologue
2753 @cindex declarations section
2755 @cindex declarations
2757 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2758 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2759 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2760 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2761 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2762 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2763 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2765 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2766 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2769 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2770 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2771 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2772 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2773 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2774 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2775 @code{%union} declaration.
2786 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2790 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2791 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2797 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2798 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2799 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2800 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2801 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2802 @code{#include} directives.
2804 @node Prologue Alternatives
2805 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2806 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2809 @findex %code requires
2810 @findex %code provides
2813 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2814 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2815 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2816 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2817 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2818 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2819 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2821 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2832 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2836 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2837 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2844 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2845 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2846 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2847 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2848 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2849 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2850 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2851 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2852 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2853 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2854 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2856 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2857 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2858 This behavior raises a few questions.
2859 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2860 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2861 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2862 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2863 This behavior is not intuitive.
2865 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2866 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2867 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2868 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2875 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2876 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2879 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2880 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2892 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2896 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2897 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2898 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2905 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2906 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2907 explicit which kind you intend.
2908 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2910 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2911 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2912 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2913 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2914 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2915 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2916 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2917 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2918 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2921 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2922 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2924 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2942 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2948 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2949 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2962 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2963 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2964 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2972 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2973 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2974 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2975 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2976 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2977 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2979 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2980 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2981 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2982 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2983 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2984 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2985 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2986 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2987 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2988 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2989 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2992 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2993 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2994 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2995 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2996 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2997 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2998 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
2999 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3000 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3001 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3019 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3025 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3026 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3039 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3045 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3046 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3054 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3055 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3056 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3059 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3060 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3061 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3062 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3063 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3064 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3067 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3068 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3069 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3070 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3072 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3073 organize your grammar file.
3074 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3079 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3080 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3081 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3082 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3086 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3087 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3088 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3089 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3094 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3095 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3097 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3099 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3100 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3101 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3102 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3104 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3105 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3106 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3107 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3108 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3109 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3110 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3111 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3114 @node Bison Declarations
3115 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3116 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3117 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3119 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3120 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3121 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3122 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3125 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3126 @cindex grammar rules section
3127 @cindex rules section for grammar
3129 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3130 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3132 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3133 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3134 if it is the first thing in the file.
3137 @subsection The epilogue
3138 @cindex additional C code section
3140 @cindex C code, section for additional
3142 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3143 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3144 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3145 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3146 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3147 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3148 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3149 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3150 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3151 C-Language Interface}.
3153 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3154 from the grammar rules.
3156 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3157 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3158 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3159 of the grammar file.
3162 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3163 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3164 @cindex terminal symbol
3168 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3171 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3172 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3173 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3174 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3175 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3176 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3177 the symbol to stand for it.
3179 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3180 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3181 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3183 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3184 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3185 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3186 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3187 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3188 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3189 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3191 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3195 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3196 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3197 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3198 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3201 @cindex character token
3202 @cindex literal token
3203 @cindex single-character literal
3204 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3205 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3206 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3207 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3208 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3209 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3210 ,Operator Precedence}).
3212 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3213 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3214 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3215 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3216 your program will confuse other readers.
3218 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3219 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3220 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3221 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3222 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3223 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3227 @cindex string token
3228 @cindex literal string token
3229 @cindex multicharacter literal
3230 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3231 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3232 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3233 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3234 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3236 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3237 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3238 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3239 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3240 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3242 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3244 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3245 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3246 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3247 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3248 read your program will be confused.
3250 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3251 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3252 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3253 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3254 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3255 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3258 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3259 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3260 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3262 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3263 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3264 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3265 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3266 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3267 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3268 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3269 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3270 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3271 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3272 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3273 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3275 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3276 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3277 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3278 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3279 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3281 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3282 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3283 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3284 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3285 characters in the following C-language string:
3288 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3291 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3292 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3293 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3294 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3295 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3296 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3297 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3298 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3299 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3300 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3303 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3304 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3305 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3306 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3307 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3310 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3312 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3313 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3315 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3319 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3324 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3325 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3326 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3337 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3338 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3340 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3341 extra white space as you wish.
3343 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3344 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3347 @{@var{C statements}@}
3352 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3353 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3354 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3355 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3356 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3357 compiler can check it.
3359 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3360 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3361 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3362 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3363 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3364 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3365 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3366 character constants.
3368 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3372 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3373 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3378 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3379 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3386 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3388 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3389 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3390 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3409 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3413 @section Recursive Rules
3414 @cindex recursive rule
3416 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3417 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3418 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3419 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3420 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3431 @cindex left recursion
3432 @cindex right recursion
3434 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3435 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3436 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3448 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3449 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3450 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3451 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3452 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3453 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3454 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3457 @cindex mutual recursion
3458 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3459 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3460 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3469 | primary '+' primary
3482 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3486 @section Defining Language Semantics
3487 @cindex defining language semantics
3488 @cindex language semantics, defining
3490 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3491 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3492 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3494 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3495 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3496 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3497 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3500 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3501 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3502 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3503 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3504 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3505 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3506 action in the middle of a rule.
3510 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3511 @cindex semantic value type
3512 @cindex value type, semantic
3513 @cindex data types of semantic values
3514 @cindex default data type
3516 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3517 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3518 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3519 Notation Calculator}).
3521 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3522 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3523 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3526 #define YYSTYPE double
3530 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3531 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3532 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3533 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3535 @node Multiple Types
3536 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3538 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3539 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3540 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3541 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3544 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3545 requires you to do two things:
3549 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3550 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3551 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3552 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3556 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3557 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3558 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3559 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3560 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3569 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3571 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3572 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3573 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3574 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3576 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3577 placed at any position in the rule;
3578 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3579 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3580 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3581 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3583 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3584 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3585 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3586 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3587 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3588 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3589 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3590 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3591 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3592 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3595 Here is a typical example:
3601 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3605 Or, in terms of named references:
3611 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3616 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3617 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3618 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3619 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3620 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3621 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3623 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3624 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3625 referred to as @code{$2}.
3627 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3628 references construct.
3630 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3631 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3632 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3633 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3634 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3638 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3642 @cindex default action
3643 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3644 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3645 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3646 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3647 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3648 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3650 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3651 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3652 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3653 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3654 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3659 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3660 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3666 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3671 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3672 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3673 definition of @code{foo}.
3676 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3677 any, from a semantic action.
3678 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3679 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3682 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3683 @cindex action data types
3684 @cindex data types in actions
3686 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3687 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3689 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3690 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3691 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3692 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3693 in the rule. In this example,
3699 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3704 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3705 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3706 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3707 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3709 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3710 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3711 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3723 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3724 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3726 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3727 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3728 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3729 @cindex mid-rule actions
3731 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3732 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3733 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3735 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3736 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3737 it is run before they are parsed.
3739 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3740 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3741 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3742 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3745 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3746 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3747 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3748 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3749 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3750 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3752 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3753 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3754 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3755 at the end of the rule.
3757 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3758 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3759 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3760 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3761 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3762 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3768 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3770 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3775 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3776 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3777 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3778 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3779 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3780 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3781 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3782 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3784 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3785 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3786 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3787 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3788 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3791 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3792 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3793 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3794 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3795 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3797 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3798 Discarded Symbols}).
3799 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3800 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3802 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3803 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3808 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3822 $$ = push_context ();
3823 declare_variable ($3);
3830 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3831 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3832 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3834 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3835 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3836 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3837 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3838 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3844 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3845 | '@{' statements '@}'
3851 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3856 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3857 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3860 | '@{' statements '@}'
3866 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3867 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3868 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3869 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3870 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3871 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3873 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3874 actions into the two rules, like this:
3879 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3880 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3881 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3882 '@{' statements '@}'
3888 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3889 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3891 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3892 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3893 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3898 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3899 declarations statements '@}'
3900 | '@{' statements '@}'
3906 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3907 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3909 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3910 serves as a subroutine:
3915 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3921 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3922 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
3928 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3929 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3931 @node Tracking Locations
3932 @section Tracking Locations
3934 @cindex textual location
3935 @cindex location, textual
3937 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3938 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3939 especially symbol locations.
3941 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3942 actions to take when rules are matched.
3945 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3946 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3947 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3951 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3952 @cindex data type of locations
3953 @cindex default location type
3955 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3956 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3958 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3959 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3960 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3961 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3965 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3974 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3975 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3976 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3977 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3978 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3980 @node Actions and Locations
3981 @subsection Actions and Locations
3982 @cindex location actions
3983 @cindex actions, location
3986 @vindex @@@var{name}
3987 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3989 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3990 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3992 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3993 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3994 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3995 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3996 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3999 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4000 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4001 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4002 references construct.
4004 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4012 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4013 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4014 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4015 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4022 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4023 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4024 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4030 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4031 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4032 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4035 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4036 example above simply rewrites this way:
4050 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4051 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4052 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4059 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4060 from a semantic action.
4061 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4062 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4064 @node Location Default Action
4065 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4066 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4067 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4069 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4070 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4071 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4072 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4073 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4074 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4075 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4076 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4079 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4080 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4082 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4083 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4084 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4085 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4086 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4087 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4088 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4089 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4090 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4091 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4093 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4097 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4101 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4102 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4103 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4104 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4108 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4109 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4110 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4111 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4118 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4119 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4120 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4122 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4126 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4127 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4130 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4131 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4132 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4133 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4136 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4137 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4138 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4139 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4142 @node Named References
4143 @section Named References
4144 @cindex named references
4146 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4147 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4148 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4149 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4150 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4151 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4153 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4154 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4155 used as named references. For example:
4159 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4160 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4165 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4169 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4170 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4175 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4181 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4184 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4187 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4192 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4193 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4194 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4197 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4198 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4203 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4204 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4205 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4208 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4209 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4215 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4216 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4219 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4220 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4224 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4225 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4226 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4227 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4228 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4229 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4230 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4232 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4236 @section Bison Declarations
4237 @cindex declarations, Bison
4238 @cindex Bison declarations
4240 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4241 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4244 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4245 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4246 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4247 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4249 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4250 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4251 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4252 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4255 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4256 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4257 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4258 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4259 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4260 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4261 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4262 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4263 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4264 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4265 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4266 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4267 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4268 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4269 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4273 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4274 @cindex version requirement
4275 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4278 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4279 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4283 %require "@var{version}"
4287 @subsection Token Type Names
4288 @cindex declaring token type names
4289 @cindex token type names, declaring
4290 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4293 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4299 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4300 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4301 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4303 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4304 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4305 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4308 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4309 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4310 following the token name:
4314 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4318 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4319 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4320 with each other or with normal characters.
4322 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4323 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4324 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4325 Than One Value Type}).
4331 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4335 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4339 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4340 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4341 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4348 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4349 equivalent literal string tokens:
4352 %token <operator> OR "||"
4353 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4358 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4359 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4360 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4361 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4362 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4363 the literal string instead of the token name.
4365 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4366 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4370 %token END 0 "end of file"
4373 @node Precedence Decl
4374 @subsection Operator Precedence
4375 @cindex precedence declarations
4376 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4377 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4379 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4380 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4381 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4382 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4383 operator precedence.
4385 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4386 @code{%token}: either
4389 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4396 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4399 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4400 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4401 all the @var{symbols}:
4405 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4406 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4407 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4408 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4409 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4410 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4411 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4412 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4413 considered a syntax error.
4416 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4417 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4418 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4419 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4420 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4423 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4424 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4425 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4426 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4431 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4432 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4436 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4437 @cindex declaring value types
4438 @cindex value types, declaring
4441 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4442 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4443 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4458 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4459 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4460 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4461 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4463 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4464 @code{union}. For example:
4476 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4477 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4480 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4481 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4482 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4484 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4485 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4487 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4488 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4489 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4490 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4498 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4503 and then your grammar can use the following
4504 instead of @code{%union}:
4517 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4518 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4519 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4523 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4524 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4525 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4528 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4532 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4533 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4534 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4535 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4536 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4539 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4540 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4541 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4542 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4544 @node Initial Action Decl
4545 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4546 @findex %initial-action
4548 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4549 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4552 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4553 @findex %initial-action
4554 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4555 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4556 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4557 @code{%parse-param}.
4560 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4563 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4566 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4571 @node Destructor Decl
4572 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4573 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4577 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4578 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4579 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4580 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4581 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4582 must discard the start symbol.
4584 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4585 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4586 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4587 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4589 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4590 symbol is automatically discarded.
4592 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4594 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4596 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4597 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4598 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4599 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4601 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4602 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4603 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4604 tag among @var{symbols}.
4605 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4606 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4607 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4609 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4610 (These default forms are experimental.
4611 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4613 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4614 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4615 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4616 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4618 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4619 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4620 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4621 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4622 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4629 %union @{ char *string; @}
4630 %token <string> STRING1
4631 %token <string> STRING2
4632 %type <string> string1
4633 %type <string> string2
4634 %union @{ char character; @}
4635 %token <character> CHR
4636 %type <character> chr
4639 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4640 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4641 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4642 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4646 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4647 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4648 to @code{free} by default.
4649 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4650 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4651 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4652 @code{free} only once.
4653 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4654 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4656 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4657 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4658 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4659 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4660 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4661 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4662 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4663 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4664 reference it in your grammar.
4665 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4666 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4672 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4673 @cindex mid-rule actions
4674 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4675 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4676 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4677 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4678 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4679 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4680 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4681 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4685 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4686 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4687 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4692 @cindex discarded symbols
4693 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4697 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4699 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4701 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4702 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4704 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4707 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4708 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4711 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4712 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4713 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4717 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4718 @cindex printing semantic values
4722 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4723 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4724 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4725 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4727 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4728 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4729 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4731 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4734 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4735 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4736 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4737 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++),
4738 @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated with the symbol, and
4739 @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are also
4740 available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4742 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4743 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4744 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4745 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4753 %union @{ char *string; @}
4754 %token <string> STRING1
4755 %token <string> STRING2
4756 %type <string> string1
4757 %type <string> string2
4758 %union @{ char character; @}
4759 %token <character> CHR
4760 %type <character> chr
4763 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4764 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4765 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4766 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4770 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4771 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4772 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4773 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4774 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4775 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4776 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4780 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4781 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4782 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4783 @cindex warnings, preventing
4784 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4788 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4789 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4790 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4791 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4792 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4793 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4795 The declaration looks like this:
4801 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4802 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4803 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4804 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4806 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4807 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4808 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4809 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4810 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4811 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4812 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4818 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4822 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4823 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4824 print the number of conflicts.
4827 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4828 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4829 go back to the beginning.
4832 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4833 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4834 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4837 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4838 but will keep silent otherwise.
4841 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4842 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4843 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4844 @cindex default start symbol
4847 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4848 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4849 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4856 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4857 @cindex reentrant parser
4859 @findex %define api.pure
4861 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4862 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4863 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4864 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4865 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4866 program must be called only within interlocks.
4868 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4869 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4870 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4871 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4872 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4874 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4875 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4876 reentrant. It looks like this:
4882 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4883 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4884 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4885 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4886 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4887 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4888 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4889 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4890 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4892 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4893 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4897 @subsection A Push Parser
4900 @findex %define api.push-pull
4902 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4903 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4905 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4906 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4907 each time a new token is made available.
4909 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4910 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4911 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4912 within a certain time period.
4914 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4915 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4916 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4919 %define api.push-pull push
4922 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4923 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4924 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4925 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4926 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4930 %define api.push-pull push
4933 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4934 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4935 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4936 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4938 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4939 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4940 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4941 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4942 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4943 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4944 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4945 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4949 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4951 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4952 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4953 yypstate_delete (ps);
4956 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4957 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4958 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4959 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4960 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4961 example would thus look like this:
4966 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4969 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4970 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4971 yypstate_delete (ps);
4974 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4975 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4977 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4978 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4979 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4980 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4981 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4982 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4983 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4984 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4985 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4986 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4987 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4988 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4989 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4990 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4991 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4992 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4993 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4997 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4998 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4999 yypstate_delete (ps);
5002 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5003 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5004 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
5007 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5008 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5009 @cindex declaration summary
5010 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5012 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5014 @deffn {Directive} %union
5015 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5016 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5019 @deffn {Directive} %token
5020 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5021 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5024 @deffn {Directive} %right
5025 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5026 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5029 @deffn {Directive} %left
5030 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5031 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5034 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5035 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5036 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5037 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5041 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5042 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5043 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5047 @deffn {Directive} %type
5048 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5049 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5052 @deffn {Directive} %start
5053 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5057 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5058 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5059 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5065 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5068 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5069 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5071 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5072 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5073 @xref{%code Summary}.
5076 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5077 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
5078 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
5079 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5082 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5083 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5084 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5085 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5088 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5089 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5090 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5091 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5092 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5094 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5095 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5096 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5097 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5098 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5099 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5100 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5101 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5102 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5103 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5105 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5106 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5107 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5109 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5110 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5111 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5113 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5114 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5115 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5116 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5117 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5119 @findex %code requires
5120 @findex %code provides
5121 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5122 header also contains their code.
5123 @xref{%code Summary}.
5126 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5127 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5130 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5131 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5132 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5135 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5136 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5137 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5140 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5141 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5142 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5143 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5145 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5149 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5150 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5151 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5152 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5153 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5154 accurate syntax error messages.
5157 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5158 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5159 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5161 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5162 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5163 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5164 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5165 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5166 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5167 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5168 For C++ parsers, see the @code{%define namespace} documentation in this
5170 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5174 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5175 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5176 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5181 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5182 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5183 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5184 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5185 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5186 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5187 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5191 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5192 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5195 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5196 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5197 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5201 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5202 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5203 Require a Version of Bison}.
5206 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5207 Specify the skeleton to use.
5209 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5210 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5211 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5212 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5214 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5215 file in the Bison installation directory.
5216 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5217 directory of the grammar file.
5218 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5221 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5222 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5223 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5224 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5225 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5226 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5227 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5230 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5231 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5232 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5233 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5234 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5235 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5236 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5239 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5240 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5241 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5245 The highest token number, plus one.
5247 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5249 The number of grammar rules,
5251 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5255 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5256 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5257 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5258 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5262 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5263 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5264 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5268 @node %define Summary
5269 @subsection %define Summary
5271 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5272 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5273 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5274 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5275 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5276 @code{%define} directive:
5278 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5279 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5280 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5281 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5283 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5284 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5285 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5286 to specifying @code{""}.
5288 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5289 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5290 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5293 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5294 @code{%define} accepts.
5296 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5297 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5301 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5303 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5304 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5306 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5308 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5309 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5312 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5313 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5314 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5315 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5316 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5317 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5320 @c ================================================== api.pure
5322 @findex %define api.pure
5325 @item Language(s): C
5327 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5328 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5330 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5332 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5336 @findex %define api.push-pull
5339 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5341 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5342 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5343 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5344 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5346 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5348 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5351 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5353 @item lr.default-reductions
5354 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5357 @item Language(s): all
5359 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5360 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5361 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5362 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5364 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5365 @item Default Value:
5367 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5368 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5372 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5374 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5375 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5378 @item Language(s): all
5379 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5380 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5381 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5382 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5385 @c ================================================== lr.type
5388 @findex %define lr.type
5391 @item Language(s): all
5393 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5394 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5395 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5397 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5399 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5403 @findex %define namespace
5406 @item Languages(s): C++
5408 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5409 For example, if you specify:
5412 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5415 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5418 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5421 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5422 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5425 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5431 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5432 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5433 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5435 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5437 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5438 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5439 lexical analyzer function.
5440 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5441 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5442 lexical analyzer function.
5443 For example, if you specify:
5446 %define namespace "foo"
5447 %name-prefix "bar::"
5450 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5454 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5456 @findex %define parse.lac
5459 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5461 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5462 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5463 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5464 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5470 @subsection %code Summary
5474 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5475 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5476 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5477 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5478 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5479 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5480 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5481 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5483 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5484 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5485 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5486 in the parser implementation.
5488 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5489 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5490 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5492 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5495 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5496 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5497 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5498 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5499 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5500 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5504 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5505 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5506 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5509 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5510 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5514 @findex %code requires
5517 @item Language(s): C, C++
5519 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5520 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5521 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5522 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5523 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5525 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5526 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5531 @findex %code provides
5534 @item Language(s): C, C++
5536 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5537 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5539 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5540 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5548 @item Language(s): C, C++
5550 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5551 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5552 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5553 parser implementation file. For example:
5562 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5566 @findex %code imports
5569 @item Language(s): Java
5571 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5573 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5574 before any class definitions.
5578 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5579 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5580 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5581 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5584 @node Multiple Parsers
5585 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5587 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5588 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5589 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5590 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5592 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5593 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5594 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5595 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5596 names that do not conflict.
5598 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5599 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5600 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5601 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5602 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5603 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5604 @code{clex}, and so on.
5606 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5607 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5608 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5609 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5610 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5612 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5613 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5614 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5615 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5618 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5619 @cindex C-language interface
5622 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5623 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5624 functions that it needs to use.
5626 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5627 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5628 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5629 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5632 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5633 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5634 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5635 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5636 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5637 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5639 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5640 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5641 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5645 @node Parser Function
5646 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5649 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5650 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5651 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5652 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5653 without reading further.
5656 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5657 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5658 is due to end-of-input).
5660 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5661 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5664 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5667 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5672 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5677 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5680 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5681 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5682 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5684 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5685 @findex %parse-param
5686 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5687 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5688 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5689 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5690 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5693 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5696 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5697 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5701 Then call the parser like this:
5705 int nastiness, randomness;
5706 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5707 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5713 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5716 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5719 @node Push Parser Function
5720 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5721 @findex yypush_parse
5723 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5724 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5726 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5727 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5728 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5729 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5731 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5732 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5733 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5734 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5737 @node Pull Parser Function
5738 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5739 @findex yypull_parse
5741 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5742 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5744 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5745 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5746 declaration is used.
5747 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5749 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5750 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5753 @node Parser Create Function
5754 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5755 @findex yypstate_new
5757 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5758 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5760 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5761 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5762 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5763 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5765 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
5766 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5767 or 0 if no memory was available.
5768 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5772 @node Parser Delete Function
5773 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5774 @findex yypstate_delete
5776 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5777 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5779 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5780 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5781 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5782 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5784 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5785 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5786 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5790 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5792 @cindex lexical analyzer
5794 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5795 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5796 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5797 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5799 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5800 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5801 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5802 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5803 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5804 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5805 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5809 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5810 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5811 of the token it has read.
5812 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5813 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5815 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5816 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5819 @node Calling Convention
5820 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5822 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5823 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5824 signifies end-of-input.
5826 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5827 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5828 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5829 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5831 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5832 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5833 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5834 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5835 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5836 signifies end-of-input.
5838 Here is an example showing these things:
5845 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5848 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5849 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5851 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5857 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5858 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5860 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5861 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5865 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5866 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5867 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5868 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5871 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5872 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5873 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5874 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5875 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5878 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5879 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5880 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5881 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5884 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5887 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5888 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5889 strlen (token_buffer))
5890 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5891 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5896 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5897 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5901 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5904 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5905 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5906 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5907 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5913 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5914 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5919 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5920 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5921 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5922 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5923 declaration looks like this:
5936 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5941 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5942 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5947 @node Token Locations
5948 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5951 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
5952 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
5953 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
5954 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
5955 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
5956 data in that variable.
5958 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5959 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5960 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5961 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5962 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5965 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5968 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5970 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
5971 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5972 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5973 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5974 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5975 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
5980 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
5983 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5984 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5989 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
5990 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
5991 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
5995 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
5996 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
5999 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
6001 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
6002 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
6008 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6009 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6010 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6014 results in the following signatures:
6017 int yylex (int *nastiness);
6018 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6021 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
6024 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
6025 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6029 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6032 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6033 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6036 @node Error Reporting
6037 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6038 @cindex error reporting function
6041 @cindex syntax error
6043 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
6044 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6045 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6046 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6049 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6050 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6051 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6052 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6053 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6055 @findex %error-verbose
6056 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
6057 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6058 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6059 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6060 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6062 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6063 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6064 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6065 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6066 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6067 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6069 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6070 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6071 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6073 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6078 yyerror (char const *s)
6082 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6087 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6088 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6089 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6090 immediately return 1.
6092 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6093 an access to the current location.
6094 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6095 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6096 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6100 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6101 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6104 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6107 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6108 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6111 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6112 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6113 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6114 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
6118 /* Location tracking. */
6122 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6124 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6125 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6129 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6132 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6133 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6134 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6135 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6140 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6141 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6142 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6143 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6144 message is always passed last.
6146 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6147 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6148 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6152 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6153 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6154 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6155 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6157 @node Action Features
6158 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6159 @cindex summary, action features
6160 @cindex action features summary
6162 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6163 are useful in actions.
6165 @deffn {Variable} $$
6166 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6167 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6170 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6171 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6172 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6175 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6176 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6177 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6178 Types of Values in Actions}.
6181 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6182 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6183 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6184 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6187 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6188 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6189 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6192 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6193 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6194 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6197 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6199 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6200 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6201 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6202 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6203 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6204 going to be reduced by this rule.
6206 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6207 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6208 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6211 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6214 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6215 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6218 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6219 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6223 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6224 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6225 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6226 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6227 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6228 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6231 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6232 @findex YYRECOVERING
6233 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6234 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6235 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6238 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6239 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6240 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6241 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6242 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6244 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6247 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6248 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6250 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6252 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6255 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6256 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6257 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6258 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6261 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6262 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6263 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6264 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6266 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6269 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6270 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6271 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6272 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6274 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6279 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6280 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6283 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6287 @c int first_line, last_line;
6288 @c int first_column, last_column;
6292 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6293 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6295 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6296 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6297 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6300 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6303 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6305 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6306 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6310 @node Internationalization
6311 @section Parser Internationalization
6312 @cindex internationalization
6318 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6319 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6320 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6321 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6322 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6323 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6324 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6325 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6328 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6329 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6330 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6335 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6336 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6337 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6338 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6339 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6343 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6348 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6349 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6350 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6351 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6352 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6353 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6354 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6355 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6356 Bison-generated parser.
6359 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6360 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6361 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6365 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6368 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6369 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6370 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6374 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6375 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6376 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6379 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6385 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6389 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6395 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6396 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6397 @cindex algorithm of parser
6400 @cindex parser stack
6401 @cindex stack, parser
6403 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6404 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6405 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6407 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6408 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6411 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6412 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6413 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6414 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6415 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6416 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6417 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6419 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6426 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6427 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6430 expr: expr '*' expr;
6434 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6441 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6442 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6444 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6445 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6446 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6448 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6451 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6452 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6453 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6454 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6455 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6456 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6457 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6458 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6459 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6460 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6464 @section Lookahead Tokens
6465 @cindex lookahead token
6467 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6468 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6469 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6470 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6471 token in order to decide what to do.
6473 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6474 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6475 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6476 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6477 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6478 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6479 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6482 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6483 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6484 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6503 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6504 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6505 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6506 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6507 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6509 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6510 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6511 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6512 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6513 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6514 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6519 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6520 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6521 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6522 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6525 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6527 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6528 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6529 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6531 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6532 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6538 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6544 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6545 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6547 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6548 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6549 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6550 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6553 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6554 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6555 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6556 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6557 contrast it with the other alternative.
6559 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6560 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6564 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6566 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6569 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6570 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6571 making these two inputs equivalent:
6574 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6576 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6579 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6580 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6581 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6582 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6583 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6584 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6585 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6586 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6588 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6589 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6590 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6591 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6593 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6595 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6596 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6597 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6602 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6615 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6625 @section Operator Precedence
6626 @cindex operator precedence
6627 @cindex precedence of operators
6629 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6630 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6631 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6632 shift and when to reduce.
6635 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6636 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6637 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6638 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6641 @node Why Precedence
6642 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6644 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6645 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6660 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6661 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6662 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6663 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6664 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6665 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6666 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6669 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6670 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6671 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6672 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6673 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6674 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6675 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6676 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6679 @cindex associativity
6680 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6681 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6682 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6683 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6684 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6685 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6686 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6687 makes right-associativity.
6689 @node Using Precedence
6690 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6695 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6696 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6697 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6698 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6699 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6700 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6701 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6704 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6705 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6706 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6707 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6708 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6710 @node Precedence Examples
6711 @subsection Precedence Examples
6713 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6721 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6722 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6723 declared with @code{'-'}:
6726 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6732 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6733 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6734 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6736 @node How Precedence
6737 @subsection How Precedence Works
6739 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6740 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6741 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6742 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6743 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6744 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6746 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6747 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6748 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6749 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6750 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6751 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6752 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6755 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6756 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6758 @node Contextual Precedence
6759 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6760 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6761 @cindex unary operator precedence
6762 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6763 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6766 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6767 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6768 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6769 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6771 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6772 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6773 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6774 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6777 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6778 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6779 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6780 modifier's syntax is:
6783 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6787 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6788 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6789 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6790 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6791 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6793 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6794 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6795 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6805 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6813 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6818 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6819 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6820 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6821 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6823 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6824 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6825 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6826 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6828 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6829 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6830 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6831 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6832 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6833 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6835 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6836 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6840 @section Parser States
6841 @cindex finite-state machine
6842 @cindex parser state
6843 @cindex state (of parser)
6845 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6846 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6847 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6848 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6849 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6851 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6852 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6853 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6854 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6855 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6856 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6857 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6858 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6861 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6862 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6863 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6866 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6867 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6868 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6870 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6871 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6874 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6875 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6880 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6882 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6888 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6889 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6895 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6896 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6897 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6898 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6899 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6900 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6902 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6903 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6904 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6906 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6907 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6908 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6909 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6910 In this example, the output of the program changes.
6912 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6913 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6914 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6915 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6919 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6920 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6924 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6930 | sequence redirects
6940 | redirects redirect
6945 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6946 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6947 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6948 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6949 in infinitely many ways!
6951 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6952 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6953 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6954 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6956 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6967 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6975 | sequence redirects
6989 | redirects redirect
6994 @node Mysterious Conflicts
6995 @section Mysterious Conflicts
6996 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
6998 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7006 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7009 | name_list ':' type
7025 | name ',' name_list
7030 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7031 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7032 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7033 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7037 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7039 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7040 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7041 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7043 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7044 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7045 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7046 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7047 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7048 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7049 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7052 @cindex canonical LR
7053 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7054 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7055 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7056 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7057 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7058 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7059 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7060 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7062 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7063 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7064 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7065 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7066 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7077 | ID BOGUS /* This rule is never used. */
7082 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7083 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7084 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7085 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7086 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7087 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7089 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7090 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7091 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7092 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7093 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7094 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7099 | name_list ':' type
7107 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7108 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7113 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7114 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7115 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7116 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7117 Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
7118 the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
7119 sometimes contain incorrect information.
7121 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7122 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7123 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7124 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7126 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7127 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7130 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7131 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7132 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7133 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7136 @node LR Table Construction
7137 @subsection LR Table Construction
7138 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7141 @cindex canonical LR
7142 @findex %define lr.type
7144 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7145 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7146 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7147 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7150 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7151 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7152 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7153 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7156 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7157 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7158 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7161 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7162 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7163 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7166 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7168 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7171 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7175 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7179 %define lr.type ielr
7182 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7183 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7184 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7185 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7186 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7187 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7188 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7189 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7190 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7191 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7193 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7194 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7195 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7196 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7202 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7205 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7207 @cindex GLR with LALR
7208 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7209 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7210 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7211 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7212 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7213 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7214 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7215 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7216 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7217 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7219 @item Malformed grammars.
7221 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7222 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7223 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7224 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7225 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7230 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7231 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7232 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7233 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7234 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7235 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7236 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7237 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7238 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7242 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7245 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7246 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7247 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7248 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7249 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7250 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7251 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7252 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7253 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7254 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7255 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7256 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7259 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7260 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7261 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7263 @node Default Reductions
7264 @subsection Default Reductions
7265 @cindex default reductions
7266 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7269 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7270 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7271 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7272 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7273 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7275 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7276 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7279 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7281 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7282 @cindex consistent states
7283 @cindex defaulted states
7284 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7285 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7286 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7287 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7288 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7289 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7290 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7291 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7292 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7293 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7294 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7296 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7297 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7298 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7299 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7300 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7301 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7302 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7303 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7304 should already be considered closed.
7306 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7308 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7309 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7310 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7311 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7312 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7313 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7314 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7315 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7316 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7320 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7321 @c sentence from being rejected.
7322 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7323 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7324 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7325 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7326 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7327 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7330 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7331 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7332 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7333 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7334 because the accept action ends the parse.
7336 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7337 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7338 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7339 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7340 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7341 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7342 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7343 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7344 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7345 split the parse instead.
7347 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7348 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7350 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7351 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7352 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7354 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7355 @item @code{consistent}
7356 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7359 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7360 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7365 @findex %define parse.lac
7367 @cindex lookahead correction
7369 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7370 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7371 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7372 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7373 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7374 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7375 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7376 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7377 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7379 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7380 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7381 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7382 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7383 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7385 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7386 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7387 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7388 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7390 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7391 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7393 @item @code{none} (default)
7396 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7397 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7401 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7402 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7403 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7404 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7405 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7406 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7407 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7408 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7409 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7410 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7413 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7414 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7415 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7416 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7417 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7418 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7419 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7420 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7421 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7422 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7424 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7425 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7426 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7427 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7428 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7429 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7430 language-recognition power.
7432 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7435 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7437 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7438 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7439 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7440 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7443 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7445 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7446 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7447 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7448 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7449 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7450 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7454 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7455 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7456 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7457 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7458 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7459 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7460 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7461 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7462 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7463 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7464 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7467 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7468 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7469 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7471 @node Unreachable States
7472 @subsection Unreachable States
7473 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7474 @cindex unreachable states
7476 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7477 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7478 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7479 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7481 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7482 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7483 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7484 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7486 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7487 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7488 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7491 There are a few caveats to consider:
7494 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7496 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7497 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7498 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7499 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7500 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7501 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7503 @item Other useless states.
7505 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7506 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7507 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7508 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7509 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7510 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7511 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7514 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7515 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7517 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7518 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7519 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7521 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7522 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7523 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7524 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7525 context-free languages.
7526 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7527 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7528 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7529 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7530 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7531 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7532 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7533 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7535 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7536 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7537 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7538 parser uses the same basic
7539 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7540 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7541 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7542 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7544 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7545 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7546 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7547 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7548 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7550 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7551 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7552 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7553 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7554 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7555 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7556 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7557 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7558 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7559 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7560 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7563 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7564 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7565 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7566 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7567 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7568 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7569 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7570 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7571 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7572 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7573 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7574 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7576 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7577 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7578 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7580 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7581 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7582 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7583 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7584 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7585 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7586 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7587 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7588 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7589 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7590 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7591 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7593 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7596 @node Memory Management
7597 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7598 @cindex memory exhaustion
7599 @cindex memory management
7600 @cindex stack overflow
7601 @cindex parser stack overflow
7602 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7604 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7605 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7606 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7608 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7609 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7610 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7613 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7614 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7615 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7616 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7618 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7619 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7620 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7621 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7622 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7623 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7625 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7626 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7627 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7630 @cindex default stack limit
7631 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7635 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7636 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7637 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7638 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7639 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7641 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7643 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7644 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7645 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7646 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7647 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7648 this deficiency in a future release.
7650 @node Error Recovery
7651 @chapter Error Recovery
7652 @cindex error recovery
7653 @cindex recovery from errors
7655 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7656 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7657 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7660 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7661 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7662 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7663 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7664 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7665 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7666 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7669 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7670 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7671 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7672 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7673 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7674 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7686 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7687 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
7689 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7690 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7691 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7692 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7693 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
7694 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7695 applicable in the ordinary way.
7697 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7698 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7699 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7700 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7701 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
7702 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7703 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7704 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7705 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7706 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7707 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7708 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7710 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7711 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7712 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7715 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7718 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7719 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7720 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7721 spurious error message:
7731 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7732 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7733 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7734 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7735 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7736 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7737 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7740 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7741 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7742 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7743 error messages resume.
7745 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7746 as any other rules can.
7749 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7750 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7751 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7752 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7755 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7756 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7757 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7759 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7761 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7762 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7763 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7764 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7765 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7767 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7768 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7769 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7770 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7773 @node Context Dependency
7774 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7776 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7777 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7778 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7779 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7783 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7784 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7785 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7786 error recovery rules must be written.
7789 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7790 neither clean nor robust.)
7792 @node Semantic Tokens
7793 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7795 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7796 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7802 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7803 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7804 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7806 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7807 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7808 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7809 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7810 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7812 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7813 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7814 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7815 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7816 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7817 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7818 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7820 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7821 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7822 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7823 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7827 typedef int foo, bar;
7831 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7832 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7838 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7839 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7841 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7842 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7843 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7844 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7845 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7850 declarator maybeasm '=' init
7851 | declarator maybeasm
7857 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
7858 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7864 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7865 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7866 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7868 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7869 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7870 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7871 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7872 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7873 the syntactic context.
7875 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7876 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7877 @cindex lexical tie-in
7879 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7880 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7883 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7884 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7885 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7886 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7887 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7894 void yyerror (char const *);
7903 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
7904 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
7905 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7919 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7920 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7921 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7923 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
7924 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
7925 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
7928 @node Tie-in Recovery
7929 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7931 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7932 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7934 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7935 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7936 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7937 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7942 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7944 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
7948 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7949 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7950 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7951 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7952 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7954 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7956 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7957 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7958 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7964 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
7970 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7971 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7972 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7973 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7975 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7976 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7977 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7978 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7979 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7980 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7983 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7986 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7988 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
7989 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
7990 chapter explains how to generate and read the detailed description of the
7991 automaton, and how to enable and understand the parser run-time traces.
7994 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7995 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7999 @section Understanding Your Parser
8001 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8002 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8003 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8004 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8005 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8007 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8008 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8009 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8010 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8011 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8012 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8013 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8015 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8033 @command{bison} reports:
8036 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8037 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8038 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8039 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8040 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8043 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8044 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8045 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8046 interpretation is the same.
8049 @cindex token, useless
8050 @cindex useless token
8051 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8052 @cindex useless nonterminal
8053 @cindex rule, useless
8054 @cindex useless rule
8055 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8056 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8057 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8058 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8061 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8064 Terminals unused in grammar
8067 Rules useless in grammar
8072 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8075 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8076 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8077 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8078 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8082 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8097 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8101 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8114 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8119 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8125 @cindex pointed rule
8126 @cindex rule, pointed
8127 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8128 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8129 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8130 the location of the input cursor.
8135 0 $accept: . exp $end
8137 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8142 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8143 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8144 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8145 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8146 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8147 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8148 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8149 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8151 @cindex core, item set
8152 @cindex item set core
8153 @cindex kernel, item set
8154 @cindex item set core
8155 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8156 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8157 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8158 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8159 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8160 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8165 0 $accept: . exp $end
8166 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8172 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8178 In the state 1@dots{}
8185 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8189 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8190 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8191 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8192 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8197 0 $accept: exp . $end
8198 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8203 $end shift, and go to state 3
8204 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8205 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8206 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8207 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8211 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8212 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8213 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8214 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8215 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8218 @cindex accepting state
8219 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8225 0 $accept: exp $end .
8231 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8232 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8234 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8240 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8242 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8249 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8251 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8258 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8260 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8267 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8269 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8274 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8280 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8286 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8287 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8289 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8290 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8293 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8294 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8295 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8296 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8297 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8298 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8299 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8300 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8302 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8303 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8304 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8307 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8308 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8309 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8310 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8311 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8312 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8313 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8314 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8315 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8316 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8317 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8318 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8323 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8324 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8329 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8330 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8332 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8333 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8336 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8337 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8338 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8339 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8340 conflicts in the report:
8343 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8344 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8345 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8349 The remaining states are similar:
8355 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8361 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8362 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8364 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8365 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8371 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8377 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8379 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8380 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8386 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8392 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8393 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8394 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8395 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8397 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8398 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8399 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8400 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8401 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8406 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8407 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8408 @samp{*}, but also because the
8409 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8413 @section Tracing Your Parser
8416 @cindex tracing the parser
8418 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
8419 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
8422 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
8423 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
8424 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
8427 @node Enabling Traces
8428 @subsection Enabling Traces
8429 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8432 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8434 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8435 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8436 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8437 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8440 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8441 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8442 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8444 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8446 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
8447 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
8448 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
8449 preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to
8451 the preferred solution.
8454 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8458 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8459 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8460 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8461 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8462 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8463 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8465 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8466 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8467 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8468 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8470 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8471 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8472 messages tell you these things:
8476 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8479 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8480 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8483 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8484 of the state stack afterward.
8487 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
8488 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
8489 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8490 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8491 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8492 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8493 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8494 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8495 grammar are to blame.
8497 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
8498 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8499 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8500 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8501 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8504 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
8506 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
8507 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
8508 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
8509 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
8510 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
8511 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
8513 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
8514 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
8515 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
8518 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
8520 /* Generate the parser description file. */
8522 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
8525 /* Formatting semantic values. */
8526 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
8527 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
8528 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
8531 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
8532 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
8533 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
8534 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
8535 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
8536 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
8538 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
8539 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
8540 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
8541 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
8542 printer will be used for them.
8544 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
8545 are sent onto standard error.
8548 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
8551 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
8552 -> $$ = nterm input ()
8558 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
8559 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
8560 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
8561 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
8563 Then the parser calls the scanner.
8565 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
8566 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
8571 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
8572 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
8573 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
8577 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
8578 Shifting token '(' ()
8580 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8581 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8583 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8584 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8585 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8591 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
8592 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting non-terminal
8593 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
8596 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
8597 Shifting token '-' ()
8599 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8600 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8602 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8603 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8604 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8605 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
8607 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
8608 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
8609 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8611 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8612 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
8618 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
8619 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
8622 Next token is token ')' ()
8623 Shifting token ')' ()
8625 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
8626 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
8628 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
8630 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
8636 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
8640 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
8641 Shifting token '\n' ()
8643 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
8644 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
8647 -> $$ = nterm line ()
8650 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
8653 -> $$ = nterm input ()
8658 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
8659 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
8660 completion of the parsing.
8663 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
8664 Shifting token $end ()
8667 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
8668 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
8672 @node The YYPRINT Macro
8673 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
8676 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
8677 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
8678 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
8680 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
8682 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
8683 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
8684 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
8686 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
8689 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8690 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8694 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8695 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
8696 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
8699 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8702 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8705 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8706 else if (type == NUM)
8707 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8711 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8714 @chapter Invoking Bison
8715 @cindex invoking Bison
8716 @cindex Bison invocation
8717 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8719 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8725 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8726 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8727 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8728 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8729 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8730 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8731 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8732 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8733 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8734 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8735 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8740 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8743 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8746 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8749 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8751 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8752 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8753 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8756 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8757 in alphabetical order by short options.
8758 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8759 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8763 @section Bison Options
8765 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8766 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8767 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8768 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8769 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8772 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8773 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8776 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8782 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8786 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8788 @item --print-localedir
8789 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8791 @item --print-datadir
8792 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8796 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8797 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8798 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8799 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8800 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8801 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8802 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8803 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8804 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8805 for compatibility with POSIX:
8812 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8813 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8814 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8815 this option is specified.
8817 @item -W [@var{category}]
8818 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8819 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8822 @item midrule-values
8823 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8825 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8828 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8831 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8832 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8835 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8838 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8839 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8840 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8843 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8847 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
8848 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
8849 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
8850 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
8851 no effect on the conflict report.
8854 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
8856 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
8857 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
8863 Turn off all the warnings.
8865 Treat warnings as errors.
8868 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8869 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8870 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8879 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
8880 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8881 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8883 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8884 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8885 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8886 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8887 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8888 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
8889 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8893 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8896 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8897 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8898 definition for @var{name}.
8900 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8901 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8902 definitions for @var{name}.
8904 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8905 definitions for @var{name}.
8908 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8909 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8910 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8912 @item -L @var{language}
8913 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8914 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8915 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8916 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8917 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8919 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8923 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8925 @item -p @var{prefix}
8926 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8927 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8928 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8932 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8933 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8934 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8935 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8936 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8937 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8940 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8941 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8942 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8944 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8945 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8946 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8947 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8949 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8950 file in the Bison installation directory.
8951 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8952 current working directory.
8953 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8956 @itemx --token-table
8957 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8964 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8965 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8966 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8967 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8970 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8971 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8972 with other short options.
8974 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8975 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8976 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8977 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8979 @item -r @var{things}
8980 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8981 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8982 separated list of @var{things} among:
8986 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8990 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8991 each rule's lookahead set.
8994 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8995 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8998 @item --report-file=@var{file}
8999 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9003 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9004 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9005 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9008 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9009 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9011 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9012 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9014 @item -g [@var{file}]
9015 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9016 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9017 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9018 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9019 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9020 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9023 @item -x [@var{file}]
9024 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9025 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9026 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9027 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9029 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9030 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9033 @node Option Cross Key
9034 @section Option Cross Key
9036 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9037 the corresponding short option and directive.
9039 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9040 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9041 @include cross-options.texi
9045 @section Yacc Library
9047 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9048 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9049 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9050 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9051 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9052 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9053 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9055 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9056 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9059 int yyerror (char const *);
9062 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9063 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9064 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9070 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9072 @node Other Languages
9073 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9076 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9077 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9081 @section C++ Parsers
9084 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9085 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9086 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9087 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9088 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9089 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9092 @node C++ Bison Interface
9093 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9094 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9098 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9099 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9100 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9101 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9103 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9105 @findex %define namespace
9106 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
9107 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
9108 generated in the following files:
9113 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
9114 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
9117 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9120 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9121 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9122 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9123 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9124 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9126 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9127 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9128 @samp{%defines} directive.
9131 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9132 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9134 @node C++ Semantic Values
9135 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9136 @c - No objects in unions
9138 @c - Printer and destructor
9140 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9141 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9142 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
9143 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
9144 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9147 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9148 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9149 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9151 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9152 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9153 to such objects are allowed.
9156 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9157 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9158 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9162 @node C++ Location Values
9163 @subsection C++ Location Values
9167 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9169 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9170 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. Two auxiliary classes
9171 define a @code{position}, a single point in a file, and a @code{location}, a
9172 range composed of a pair of @code{position}s (possibly spanning several
9176 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
9177 genuine code only the latter is used.
9180 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
9181 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
9185 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
9187 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9188 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
9189 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
9193 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9194 Reset the position to the given values.
9197 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
9198 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9199 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9200 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9201 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9204 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
9205 The line, starting at 1.
9208 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9209 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9212 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
9213 The column, starting at 1.
9216 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9217 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9220 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
9221 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
9222 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
9223 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
9224 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9227 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
9228 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
9229 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
9232 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9233 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9234 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9235 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9239 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
9241 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
9242 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9245 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
9246 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
9247 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9250 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9251 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
9254 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
9255 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
9256 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9259 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9260 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9261 Advance the @code{end} position.
9264 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
9265 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
9266 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
9267 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9270 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9271 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9274 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
9275 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
9276 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
9280 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
9281 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
9282 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
9285 @node C++ Parser Interface
9286 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
9287 @c - define parser_class_name
9289 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9291 @c - Reporting errors
9293 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9294 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9295 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9296 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9297 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9298 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9299 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9300 additional argument for its constructor.
9302 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9303 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9304 The types for semantics value and locations.
9307 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9308 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
9309 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
9310 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9311 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9312 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9315 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9316 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9317 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9320 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9321 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9324 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9325 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9326 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9330 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9331 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9332 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9333 or nonzero, full tracing.
9336 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9337 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9338 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9339 described by @var{m}.
9343 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9344 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9345 @c - prefix for yylex.
9346 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9349 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9350 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9351 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
9353 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9354 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9355 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9356 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9360 @node A Complete C++ Example
9361 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9363 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9364 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9365 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9366 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9367 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9368 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9369 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
9370 actually easier to interface with.
9373 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9374 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9375 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9376 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9377 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9380 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9381 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9383 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9384 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9385 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9386 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9387 of valid input follows.
9391 seven := one + two * three
9395 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9396 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9398 @c - A place to store error messages
9399 @c - A place for the result
9401 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9402 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9403 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9404 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9405 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9406 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9407 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9409 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9410 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9411 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9414 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9416 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9417 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9420 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9425 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9426 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9427 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9428 factor both as follows.
9430 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9432 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9434 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
9435 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
9436 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
9437 calcxx_driver& driver)
9438 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9443 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9446 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9448 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9453 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9455 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9461 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
9462 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
9464 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9466 // Handling the scanner.
9469 bool trace_scanning;
9473 Similarly for the parser itself.
9475 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9477 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
9478 int parse (const std::string& f);
9484 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9485 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9486 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9487 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9489 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9492 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9493 void error (const std::string& m);
9495 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9498 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9499 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9500 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9501 messages and set error state.
9503 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9505 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9506 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9508 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9509 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9511 variables["one"] = 1;
9512 variables["two"] = 2;
9515 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9520 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9524 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9525 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9526 int res = parser.parse ();
9532 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9534 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9538 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9540 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9545 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9547 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9548 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9549 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
9550 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
9553 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9555 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9556 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9558 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9562 @findex %code requires
9563 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
9564 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
9565 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
9566 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9567 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
9568 use a forward declaration of the driver.
9569 @xref{%code Summary}.
9571 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9575 class calcxx_driver;
9580 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9581 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9584 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9586 // The parsing context.
9587 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9588 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9592 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
9593 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9594 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9595 automatically propagated.
9597 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9602 // Initialize the initial location.
9603 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9608 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
9609 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
9612 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9619 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
9622 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9634 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9635 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9637 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9640 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9646 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9647 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
9648 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
9649 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
9652 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9654 %token END 0 "end of file"
9656 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9657 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
9662 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
9665 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9666 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9668 %printer @{ yyoutput << *$$; @} "identifier"
9669 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
9671 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <ival>
9675 The grammar itself is straightforward.
9677 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9681 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9685 | assignments assignment @{@};
9688 "identifier" ":=" exp
9689 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
9693 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9694 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9695 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9696 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9697 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
9698 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
9703 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9706 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9709 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
9710 const std::string& m)
9712 driver.error (l, m);
9716 @node Calc++ Scanner
9717 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9719 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9720 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9722 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9724 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9729 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9730 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9732 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9733 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9734 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9735 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
9739 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
9740 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
9741 not of token_type. */
9742 #define yyterminate() return token::END
9747 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9748 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9749 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9750 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
9752 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9754 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9758 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9760 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9762 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9768 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9769 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9770 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
9771 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
9772 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9773 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9774 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9776 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9780 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
9787 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
9788 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
9792 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
9793 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
9794 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
9795 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
9797 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9800 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
9802 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
9803 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
9804 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
9807 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9808 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9809 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
9811 return token::NUMBER;
9813 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
9814 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
9819 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
9820 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9822 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9826 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9828 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9829 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
9831 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9833 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
9834 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
9841 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9848 @node Calc++ Top Level
9849 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9851 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9853 @comment file: calc++.cc
9856 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9860 main (int argc, char *argv[])
9862 calcxx_driver driver;
9863 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
9864 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
9865 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9866 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
9867 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9868 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
9869 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9875 @section Java Parsers
9878 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
9879 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
9880 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
9881 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9882 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
9883 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
9884 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9885 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
9888 @node Java Bison Interface
9889 @subsection Java Bison Interface
9890 @c - %language "Java"
9892 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
9893 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9895 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
9896 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
9898 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9899 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
9900 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
9901 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
9902 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
9903 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
9904 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
9905 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
9906 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
9907 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
9909 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
9911 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
9912 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
9913 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
9914 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
9917 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
9918 api.push-pull} have no effect.
9920 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
9921 @code{glr-parser} directive.
9923 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
9924 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
9926 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
9927 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
9928 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
9929 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
9930 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
9931 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
9932 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
9933 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
9934 access the token names and codes.
9936 @node Java Semantic Values
9937 @subsection Java Semantic Values
9938 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
9940 @c - Printer and destructor
9942 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
9943 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
9944 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
9947 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
9948 %type <Integer> number
9951 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
9952 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
9953 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
9954 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
9955 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
9958 %define stype "ASTNode"
9962 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
9963 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
9965 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9966 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
9967 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
9968 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
9969 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
9970 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
9972 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
9973 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
9974 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
9976 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
9977 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
9978 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
9981 @node Java Location Values
9982 @subsection Java Location Values
9987 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
9988 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
9989 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
9990 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9991 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
9992 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
9993 renamed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
9995 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
9996 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
9997 with @code{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
9998 be supplied by the user.
10001 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10002 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10003 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10006 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10007 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10010 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10011 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10014 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10015 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10016 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10017 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10021 @node Java Parser Interface
10022 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10023 @c - define parser_class_name
10025 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10027 @c - Reporting errors
10029 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10030 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10031 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10032 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10033 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10035 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10036 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10037 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10038 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10039 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10040 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10042 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10043 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10044 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10045 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
10047 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10048 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10049 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10050 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10051 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10052 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10054 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
10055 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
10057 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10058 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10059 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10060 which initialize them automatically.
10062 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
10063 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
10065 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10066 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10067 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
10071 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10072 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
10073 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
10075 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
10076 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
10077 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
10080 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
10081 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
10082 @code{false} otherwise.
10085 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
10086 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
10087 from a syntax error.
10088 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10091 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
10092 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
10093 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10097 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
10098 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
10099 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10100 or nonzero, full tracing.
10104 @node Java Scanner Interface
10105 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
10108 @c - Lexer interface
10110 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
10111 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10112 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10113 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
10115 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10116 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10117 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10118 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10121 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10122 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10123 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10124 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10127 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10129 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10130 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10131 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10132 changed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
10135 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10136 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10137 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10140 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10141 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10144 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10145 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10146 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10147 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10148 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10150 The return type can be changed using @code{%define position_type
10151 "@var{class-name}".}
10154 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10155 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10157 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
10158 "@var{class-name}".}
10162 @node Java Action Features
10163 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10165 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10166 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10168 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10169 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10172 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10173 This may not be assigned to.
10174 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10177 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10178 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10179 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10183 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10184 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10185 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10186 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10187 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10188 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10191 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10192 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10193 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10194 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10196 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10200 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10201 This may not be assigned to.
10202 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10206 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10207 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10210 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
10211 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10212 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10215 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
10216 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10217 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10220 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
10221 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
10222 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10225 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10226 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10227 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10229 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10232 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
10233 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
10234 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
10235 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10240 @node Java Differences
10241 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10243 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10244 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10245 section summarizes these differences.
10249 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10250 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10251 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10252 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10253 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10254 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10255 @xref{Java Action Features}.
10257 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10258 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10259 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10260 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10261 corresponds to these C macros.}.
10264 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10265 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10266 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10267 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10268 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10269 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10270 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10271 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
10272 @ref{Java Action Features}.
10275 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10277 @item @code{%code imports}
10278 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10279 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10280 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
10282 @item unqualified @code{%code}
10283 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10285 @item @code{%code lexer}
10286 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10287 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10288 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
10292 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10293 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10294 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10296 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10297 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10302 @node Java Declarations Summary
10303 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10305 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10306 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10308 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10309 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10312 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10313 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10314 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10315 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10316 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10319 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10320 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10321 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10322 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10325 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10326 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10327 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10328 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10331 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10332 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10333 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10336 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10337 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10338 a Java @emph{type}.
10339 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10342 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10343 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10344 @xref{Java Differences}.
10347 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10348 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10349 @xref{Java Differences}.
10352 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10353 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10354 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10357 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10358 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10359 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10360 @xref{Java Differences}.
10363 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10364 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
10365 @xref{Java Differences}.
10368 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10369 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10370 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10373 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10374 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10375 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10378 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10379 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10380 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10383 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10384 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10386 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10389 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10390 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10391 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10392 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10395 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
10396 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10397 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10398 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10399 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10402 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10403 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10404 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10407 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10408 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10409 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10410 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10413 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
10414 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10415 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10416 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10419 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10420 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10421 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10424 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10425 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10426 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10429 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10430 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10431 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10434 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10435 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10436 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10437 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10441 @c ================================================= FAQ
10444 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10445 @cindex frequently asked questions
10448 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10452 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10453 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10454 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10455 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10456 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10457 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10458 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10459 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10460 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10461 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10462 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10463 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10466 @node Memory Exhausted
10467 @section Memory Exhausted
10470 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10471 message. What can I do?
10474 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10477 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10478 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10480 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10481 following typical questions:
10484 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10485 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10486 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10493 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10494 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10495 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10498 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10499 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10500 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10501 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10502 @file{first-line.l}:
10508 #include <stdlib.h>
10512 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10516 yyparse (char const *file)
10518 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10522 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10526 /* One token only. */
10528 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10531 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10549 If the file @file{input} contains
10557 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10560 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10561 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10562 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10567 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10568 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10569 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10570 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10571 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10572 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10573 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10574 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10577 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10578 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10579 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10580 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10582 @node Strings are Destroyed
10583 @section Strings are Destroyed
10586 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10587 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10588 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10591 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10592 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10593 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10599 char *yylval = NULL;
10604 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10612 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10613 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10614 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10615 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10621 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10624 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10625 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10626 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10632 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10633 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10634 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10635 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10636 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10637 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10640 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10641 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10642 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10647 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10648 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10651 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10652 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10655 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10656 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10657 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10658 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10659 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10660 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10661 execute simple instructions one after the others.
10663 @cindex abstract syntax tree
10665 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10666 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10667 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10668 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10669 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10670 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10673 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10674 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10677 @node Multiple start-symbols
10678 @section Multiple start-symbols
10681 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
10682 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
10683 multiple entry points.
10686 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
10687 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
10688 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
10689 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10693 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
10700 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10701 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10703 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10704 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10705 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10706 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10707 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10708 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10709 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10710 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10713 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10718 int t = start_token;
10723 /* @r{The rules.} */
10727 @node Secure? Conform?
10728 @section Secure? Conform?
10731 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10734 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10735 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10736 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10737 please send us a bug report.
10739 @node I can't build Bison
10740 @section I can't build Bison
10743 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10744 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10748 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10749 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10750 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10751 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10752 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10753 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10754 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10757 @node Where can I find help?
10758 @section Where can I find help?
10761 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10764 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10765 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10766 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10767 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10768 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10769 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10770 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10771 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10775 @section Bug Reports
10778 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10781 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10782 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10783 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10784 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10785 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10787 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10788 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10789 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10790 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10791 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10793 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10794 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10795 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10796 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10797 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10798 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10800 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10801 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
10803 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10805 @node More Languages
10806 @section More Languages
10809 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10810 favorite language here}?
10813 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10814 languages; contributions are welcome.
10817 @section Beta Testing
10820 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10823 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10824 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10825 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10826 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10827 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10828 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10829 essentially halted.
10831 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10832 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10833 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10834 systems are especially welcome.
10836 @node Mailing Lists
10837 @section Mailing Lists
10840 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10843 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10845 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10847 @node Table of Symbols
10848 @appendix Bison Symbols
10849 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
10850 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10852 @deffn {Variable} @@$
10853 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10854 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10857 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10858 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
10859 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10862 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
10863 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10867 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
10868 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10872 @deffn {Variable} $$
10873 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
10877 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
10878 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
10879 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
10882 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
10883 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10887 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
10888 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10892 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
10893 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
10894 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
10895 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
10898 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
10899 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
10900 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
10901 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
10902 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
10906 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
10907 Comment delimiters, as in C.
10910 @deffn {Delimiter} :
10911 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
10915 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
10916 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10919 @deffn {Delimiter} |
10920 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
10921 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10924 @deffn {Directive} <*>
10925 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
10928 This feature is experimental.
10929 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10932 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10935 @deffn {Directive} <>
10936 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
10939 This feature is experimental.
10940 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10943 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10946 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
10947 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
10948 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
10949 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
10952 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
10953 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
10954 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
10955 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
10956 @xref{%code Summary}.
10959 @deffn {Directive} %debug
10960 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10964 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
10965 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10966 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10971 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
10972 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
10973 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
10974 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
10977 @deffn {Directive} %defines
10978 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
10979 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10982 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
10983 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
10984 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10987 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
10988 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
10989 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10992 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
10993 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
10994 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
10998 @deffn {Symbol} $end
10999 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11000 used in the grammar.
11003 @deffn {Symbol} error
11004 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11005 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11006 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11007 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11008 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
11009 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
11010 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
11011 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11014 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
11015 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
11016 when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11019 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11020 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
11024 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
11025 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
11026 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11029 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
11030 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
11033 @deffn {Directive} %language
11034 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
11035 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11038 @deffn {Directive} %left
11039 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
11040 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11043 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11044 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11045 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
11049 @deffn {Directive} %merge
11050 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
11051 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
11052 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
11053 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11056 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11057 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11061 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
11062 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11063 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11068 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
11069 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
11070 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11073 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
11074 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
11075 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11078 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
11079 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
11080 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11083 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11084 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11085 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
11086 Function @code{yyparse}}.
11089 @deffn {Directive} %prec
11090 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
11091 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
11094 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11095 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
11096 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
11097 unreasonable usage.
11100 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11101 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11102 Require a Version of Bison}.
11105 @deffn {Directive} %right
11106 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
11107 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11110 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11111 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11112 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11115 @deffn {Directive} %start
11116 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11120 @deffn {Directive} %token
11121 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11122 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11125 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
11126 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
11127 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11130 @deffn {Directive} %type
11131 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11132 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11135 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11136 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11137 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11141 @deffn {Directive} %union
11142 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11143 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11146 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11147 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11148 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11149 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11150 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11152 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11156 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11157 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11158 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11159 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11161 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11165 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11166 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11167 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11170 @deffn {Variable} yychar
11171 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11172 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11173 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11174 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11177 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11178 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11179 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11182 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11183 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11184 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11187 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
11188 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11189 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11190 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11193 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11194 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11195 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11198 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11199 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
11200 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
11201 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
11202 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
11203 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11205 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11209 @deffn {Function} yyerror
11210 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11211 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
11212 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11215 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11216 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
11217 to request verbose, specific error message strings
11218 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
11219 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
11220 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11223 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
11224 Macro used to output run-time traces.
11225 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
11228 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11229 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11230 @xref{Memory Management}.
11233 @deffn {Function} yylex
11234 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11235 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11239 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11240 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11241 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11242 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11243 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11246 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
11247 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11248 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11249 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11251 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11253 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11254 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11255 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11258 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11259 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11260 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11263 @deffn {Variable} yylval
11264 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11265 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11266 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11268 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11269 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11270 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11273 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11274 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11278 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11279 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11280 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11281 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11282 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11285 @deffn {Function} yyparse
11286 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11287 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11290 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
11291 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
11292 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
11293 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
11296 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11297 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11298 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11299 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11300 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11301 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11302 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11305 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11306 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11307 call this function to create a new parser.
11308 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11309 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11310 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11311 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11314 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11315 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11316 parse the rest of the input stream.
11317 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11318 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11319 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11320 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11323 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11324 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11325 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11326 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11327 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11328 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11331 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11332 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11333 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11334 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11335 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11338 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11339 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11340 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11341 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11344 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
11345 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
11346 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
11347 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
11348 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
11349 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11350 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11352 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11353 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11354 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11355 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11356 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11357 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11358 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11361 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11362 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11363 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11371 @item Accepting state
11372 A state whose only action is the accept action.
11373 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11374 @xref{Understanding,,}.
11376 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11377 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11378 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11379 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11380 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11382 @item Consistent state
11383 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11385 @item Context-free grammars
11386 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11387 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11388 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11389 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11392 @item Default reduction
11393 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11394 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
11395 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
11396 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11399 @item Defaulted state
11400 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11402 @item Dynamic allocation
11403 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11404 compile time or on entry to a function.
11407 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11408 character string of length zero.
11410 @item Finite-state stack machine
11411 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11412 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11413 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11414 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11415 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11416 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11418 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11419 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11420 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11421 deterministic parsing
11422 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11423 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11424 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11428 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11429 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11430 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11432 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11433 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11434 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11435 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11436 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11437 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11438 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11439 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11440 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11441 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11443 @item Infix operator
11444 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11445 performs some operation.
11448 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11450 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11451 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11452 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11453 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11454 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11455 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11456 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11458 @item Language construct
11459 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11460 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11461 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11463 @item Left associativity
11464 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11465 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11466 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11468 @item Left recursion
11469 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11470 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11473 @item Left-to-right parsing
11474 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11475 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11477 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11478 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11479 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11481 @item Lexical tie-in
11482 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11483 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11485 @item Literal string token
11486 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11488 @item Lookahead token
11489 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11493 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11494 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11495 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11498 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11499 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11501 @item Nonterminal symbol
11502 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11503 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11504 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11507 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11508 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11511 @item Postfix operator
11512 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11513 performs some operation.
11516 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11517 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11521 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11522 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11523 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11525 @item Reverse polish notation
11526 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11528 @item Right recursion
11529 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11530 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11534 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11535 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11536 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11539 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11540 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11541 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11543 @item Single-character literal
11544 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11545 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11548 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11549 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11550 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11551 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11554 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11555 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11556 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11559 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11560 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11563 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11564 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11565 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11566 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11568 @item Terminal symbol
11569 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11570 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11571 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11573 @item Unreachable state
11574 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
11575 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
11576 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
11579 @node Copying This Manual
11580 @appendix Copying This Manual
11584 @unnumbered Bibliography
11588 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
11589 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
11590 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
11591 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
11593 @item [Denny 2010 May]
11594 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
11595 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
11596 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
11597 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
11599 @item [Denny 2010 November]
11600 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
11601 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
11602 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
11603 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
11605 @item [DeRemer 1982]
11606 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
11607 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
11608 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
11609 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
11612 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
11613 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
11614 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
11617 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
11618 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
11619 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
11620 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
11630 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11631 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11632 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11633 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11634 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11635 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11636 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11637 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11638 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11639 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11640 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11641 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11642 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11643 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
11644 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11645 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11646 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11647 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11648 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11649 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11650 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11651 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11652 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11653 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
11654 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11655 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11656 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11657 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11658 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11659 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11660 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
11661 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
11662 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11663 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
11664 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11665 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11666 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11667 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
11668 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
11669 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
11670 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
11671 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
11672 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
11673 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
11674 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
11675 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
11676 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
11677 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
11678 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
11679 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
11680 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
11681 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy
11682 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american
11684 @c Local Variables:
11685 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"