]> git.saurik.com Git - bison.git/blob - tests/conflicts.at
tests: port to Solaris 10 'diff -u'
[bison.git] / tests / conflicts.at
1 # Exercising Bison on conflicts. -*- Autotest -*-
2
3 # Copyright (C) 2002-2005, 2007-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
4
5 # This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
6 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
7 # the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
8 # (at your option) any later version.
9 #
10 # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
11 # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
12 # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
13 # GNU General Public License for more details.
14 #
15 # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
16 # along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
17
18 AT_BANNER([[Conflicts.]])
19
20
21 ## ---------------- ##
22 ## S/R in initial. ##
23 ## ---------------- ##
24
25 # I once hacked Bison in such a way that it lost its reductions on the
26 # initial state (because it was confusing it with the last state). It
27 # took me a while to strip down my failures to this simple case. So
28 # make sure it finds the s/r conflict below.
29
30 AT_SETUP([S/R in initial])
31
32 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
33 [[%expect 1
34 %%
35 exp: e 'e';
36 e: 'e' | /* Nothing. */;
37 ]])
38
39 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
40 [[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: e: /* empty */
41 ]])
42
43 AT_CLEANUP
44
45
46 ## ------------------- ##
47 ## %nonassoc and eof. ##
48 ## ------------------- ##
49
50 AT_SETUP([%nonassoc and eof])
51
52 AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([input.y],
53 [[
54 %{
55 #include <stdio.h>
56 #include <stdlib.h>
57 #include <string.h>
58
59 #define YYERROR_VERBOSE 1
60 static void
61 yyerror (const char *msg)
62 {
63 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", msg);
64 }
65
66 /* The current argument. */
67 static const char *input;
68
69 static int
70 yylex (void)
71 {
72 static size_t toknum;
73 if (! (toknum <= strlen (input)))
74 abort ();
75 return input[toknum++];
76 }
77
78 %}
79
80 %nonassoc '<' '>'
81
82 %%
83 expr: expr '<' expr
84 | expr '>' expr
85 | '0'
86 ;
87 %%
88 int
89 main (int argc, const char *argv[])
90 {
91 input = argc <= 1 ? "" : argv[1];
92 return yyparse ();
93 }
94 ]])
95
96 m4_pushdef([AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK],
97 [AT_BISON_CHECK([$1[ -o input.c input.y]])
98 AT_COMPILE([input])
99
100 m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($2, [correct], [[, expecting $end]])])
101
102 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0'])
103 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0<0'], [1], [],
104 [syntax error, unexpected '<'AT_EXPECTING
105 ])
106
107 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0'])
108 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0>0'], [1], [],
109 [syntax error, unexpected '>'AT_EXPECTING
110 ])
111
112 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0>0'], [1], [],
113 [syntax error, unexpected '>'AT_EXPECTING
114 ])
115
116 m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])])
117
118 # Expected token list is missing.
119 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([], [[incorrect]])
120
121 # We must disable default reductions in inconsistent states in order to
122 # have an explicit list of all expected tokens.
123 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dlr.default-reductions=consistent]],
124 [[correct]])
125
126 # lr.default-reductions=consistent happens to work for this test case.
127 # However, for other grammars, lookahead sets can be merged for
128 # different left contexts, so it is still possible to have an incorrect
129 # expected list. Canonical LR is almost a general solution (that is, it
130 # can fail only when %nonassoc is used), so make sure it gives the same
131 # result as above.
132 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr]], [[correct]])
133
134 # parse.lac=full is a completely general solution that does not require
135 # any of the above sacrifices. Of course, it does not extend the
136 # language-recognition power of LALR to (IE)LR, but it does ensure that
137 # the reported list of expected tokens matches what the given parser
138 # would have accepted in place of the unexpected token.
139 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dparse.lac=full]], [[correct]])
140
141 m4_popdef([AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK])
142
143 AT_CLEANUP
144
145
146
147 ## ------------------------------------------- ##
148 ## parse.error=verbose and consistent errors. ##
149 ## ------------------------------------------- ##
150
151 AT_SETUP([[parse.error=verbose and consistent errors]])
152
153 m4_pushdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK], [
154
155 AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS([$1])
156
157 m4_pushdef([AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE],
158 [AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[int yylex (yy::parser::semantic_type *lvalp)]],
159 [[int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp)]])])
160
161 AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([AT_DATA], [AT_DATA_GRAMMAR])([input.y],
162 [AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
163
164 %code imports {
165 import java.io.IOException;
166 }]], [[
167
168 %code {]AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[
169 #include <string>]], [[
170 #include <assert.h>
171 #include <stdio.h>
172 void yyerror (char const *msg);]])[
173 ]AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE[;
174 #define USE(Var)
175 }
176
177 ]AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[%defines]], [[%define api.pure]])])[
178
179 ]$1[
180
181 %define parse.error verbose
182
183 %%
184
185 ]$2[
186
187 ]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[%code lexer {]], [[%%]])[
188
189 /*--------.
190 | yylex. |
191 `--------*/]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
192
193 public String input = "]$3[";
194 public int index = 0;
195 public int yylex ()
196 {
197 if (index < input.length ())
198 return input.charAt (index++);
199 else
200 return 0;
201 }
202 public Object getLVal ()
203 {
204 return new Integer(1);
205 }]], [[
206
207 ]AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE[
208 {
209 static char const *input = "]$3[";
210 *lvalp = 1;
211 return *input++;
212 }]])[
213
214 /*----------.
215 | yyerror. |
216 `----------*/]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
217
218 public void yyerror (String msg)
219 {
220 System.err.println (msg);
221 }
222
223 };
224
225 %%]], [AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[
226
227 void
228 yy::parser::error (std::string const &msg)
229 {
230 std::cerr << msg << std::endl;
231 }]], [[
232
233 void
234 yyerror (char const *msg)
235 {
236 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", msg);
237 }]])])[
238
239 /*-------.
240 | main. |
241 `-------*/]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
242
243 class input
244 {
245 public static void main (String args[]) throws IOException
246 {
247 YYParser p = new YYParser ();
248 p.parse ();
249 }
250 }]], [AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[
251
252 int
253 main (void)
254 {
255 yy::parser parser;
256 return parser.parse ();
257 }]], [[
258
259 int
260 main (void)
261 {
262 return yyparse ();
263 }]])])[
264 ]])
265
266 AT_FULL_COMPILE([[input]])
267
268 m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($5, [ab], [[, expecting 'a' or 'b']],
269 $5, [a], [[, expecting 'a']],
270 $5, [b], [[, expecting 'b']])])
271
272 AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([AT_JAVA_PARSER_CHECK([[input]], [[0]]],
273 [AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]]]),
274 [[]],
275 [[syntax error, unexpected ]$4[]AT_EXPECTING[
276 ]])
277
278 m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])
279 m4_popdef([AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE])
280 AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
281
282 ])
283
284 m4_pushdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
285 [[%nonassoc 'a';
286
287 start: consistent-error-on-a-a 'a' ;
288
289 consistent-error-on-a-a:
290 'a' default-reduction
291 | 'a' default-reduction 'a'
292 | 'a' shift
293 ;
294
295 default-reduction: /*empty*/ ;
296 shift: 'b' ;
297
298 // Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this
299 // test case looks a little more realistic.
300 start: 'b' consistent-error-on-a-a 'c' ;
301 ]])
302
303 m4_pushdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], [[a]])
304
305 # Unfortunately, no expected tokens are reported even though 'b' can be
306 # accepted. Nevertheless, the main point of this test is to make sure
307 # that at least the unexpected token is reported. In a previous version
308 # of Bison, it wasn't reported because the error is detected in a
309 # consistent state with an error action, and that case always triggered
310 # the simple "syntax error" message.
311 #
312 # The point isn't to test IELR here, but state merging happens to
313 # complicate this example.
314 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr]],
315 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
316 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
317 [[$end]], [[none]])
318 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
319 %glr-parser]],
320 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
321 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
322 [[$end]], [[none]])
323 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
324 %language "c++"]],
325 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
326 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
327 [[$end]], [[none]])
328 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
329 %language "java"]],
330 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
331 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
332 [[end of input]], [[none]])
333
334 # Even canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'!
335 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
336 %define lr.default-reductions consistent]],
337 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
338 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
339 [[$end]], [[ab]])
340 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
341 %define lr.default-reductions accepting]],
342 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
343 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
344 [[$end]], [[ab]])
345 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr]],
346 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
347 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
348 [[$end]], [[ab]])
349
350 # Only LAC gets it right.
351 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr
352 %define parse.lac full]],
353 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
354 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
355 [[$end]], [[b]])
356 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
357 %define parse.lac full]],
358 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
359 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
360 [[$end]], [[b]])
361
362 m4_popdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR])
363 m4_popdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT])
364
365 m4_pushdef([AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
366 [[%nonassoc 'a';
367
368 // If $$ = 0 here, then we know that the 'a' destructor is being invoked
369 // incorrectly for the 'b' set in the semantic action below. All 'a'
370 // tokens are returned by yylex, which sets $$ = 1.
371 %destructor {
372 if (!$$)
373 fprintf (stderr, "Wrong destructor.\n");
374 } 'a';
375
376 // Rather than depend on an inconsistent state to induce reading a
377 // lookahead as in the previous grammar, just assign the lookahead in a
378 // semantic action. That lookahead isn't needed before either error
379 // action is encountered. In a previous version of Bison, this was a
380 // problem as it meant yychar was not translated into yytoken before
381 // either error action. The second error action thus invoked a
382 // destructor that it selected according to the incorrect yytoken. The
383 // first error action would have reported an incorrect unexpected token
384 // except that, due to the bug described in the previous grammar, the
385 // unexpected token was not reported at all.
386 start: error-reduce consistent-error 'a' { USE ($][3); } ;
387
388 error-reduce:
389 'a' 'a' consistent-reduction consistent-error 'a'
390 { USE (($][1, $][2, $][5)); }
391 | 'a' error
392 { USE ($][1); }
393 ;
394
395 consistent-reduction: /*empty*/ {
396 assert (yychar == YYEMPTY);
397 yylval = 0;
398 yychar = 'b';
399 } ;
400
401 consistent-error:
402 'a' { USE ($][1); }
403 | /*empty*/ %prec 'a'
404 ;
405
406 // Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this
407 // test case looks a little more realistic.
408 start: 'b' consistent-error 'b' ;
409 ]])
410 m4_pushdef([AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT], [[aa]])
411
412 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[]],
413 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
414 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
415 [['b']], [[none]])
416 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%glr-parser]],
417 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
418 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
419 [['b']], [[none]])
420 # No C++ or Java test because yychar cannot be manipulated by users.
421
422 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.default-reductions consistent]],
423 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
424 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
425 [['b']], [[none]])
426
427 # Canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'!
428 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.default-reductions accepting]],
429 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
430 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
431 [[$end]], [[a]])
432 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr]],
433 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
434 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
435 [[$end]], [[a]])
436
437 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define parse.lac full]],
438 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
439 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
440 [['b']], [[none]])
441 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define parse.lac full
442 %define lr.default-reductions accepting]],
443 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
444 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
445 [[$end]], [[none]])
446
447 m4_popdef([AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR])
448 m4_popdef([AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT])
449
450 m4_popdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK])
451
452 AT_CLEANUP
453
454
455
456 ## ------------------------------------------------------- ##
457 ## LAC: %nonassoc requires splitting canonical LR states. ##
458 ## ------------------------------------------------------- ##
459
460 # This test case demonstrates that, when %nonassoc is used, canonical
461 # LR(1) parser table construction followed by conflict resolution
462 # without further state splitting is not always sufficient to produce a
463 # parser that can detect all syntax errors as soon as possible on one
464 # token of lookahead. However, LAC solves the problem completely even
465 # with minimal LR parser tables.
466
467 AT_SETUP([[LAC: %nonassoc requires splitting canonical LR states]])
468
469 AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]],
470 [[%code {
471 #include <stdio.h>
472 void yyerror (char const *);
473 int yylex (void);
474 }
475
476 %error-verbose
477 %nonassoc 'a'
478
479 %%
480
481 start:
482 'a' problem 'a' // First context.
483 | 'b' problem 'b' // Second context.
484 | 'c' reduce-nonassoc // Just makes reduce-nonassoc useful.
485 ;
486
487 problem:
488 look reduce-nonassoc
489 | look 'a'
490 | look 'b'
491 ;
492
493 // For the state reached after shifting the 'a' in these productions,
494 // lookahead sets are the same in both the first and second contexts.
495 // Thus, canonical LR reuses the same state for both contexts. However,
496 // the lookahead 'a' for the reduction "look: 'a'" later becomes an
497 // error action only in the first context. In order to immediately
498 // detect the syntax error on 'a' here for only the first context, this
499 // canonical LR state would have to be split into two states, and the
500 // 'a' lookahead would have to be removed from only one of the states.
501 look:
502 'a' // Reduction lookahead set is always ['a', 'b'].
503 | 'a' 'b'
504 | 'a' 'c' // 'c' is forgotten as an expected token.
505 ;
506
507 reduce-nonassoc: %prec 'a';
508
509 %%
510
511 void
512 yyerror (char const *msg)
513 {
514 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", msg);
515 }
516
517 int
518 yylex (void)
519 {
520 char const *input = "aaa";
521 return *input++;
522 }
523
524 int
525 main (void)
526 {
527 return yyparse ();
528 }
529 ]])
530
531 # Show canonical LR's failure.
532 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr -o input.c input.y]],
533 [[0]], [[]],
534 [[input.y: conflicts: 2 shift/reduce
535 ]])
536 AT_COMPILE([[input]])
537 AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
538 [[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b'
539 ]])
540
541 # It's corrected by LAC.
542 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr -Dparse.lac=full \
543 -o input.c input.y]], [[0]], [[]],
544 [[input.y: conflicts: 2 shift/reduce
545 ]])
546 AT_COMPILE([[input]])
547 AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
548 [[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' or 'c'
549 ]])
550
551 # IELR is sufficient when LAC is used.
552 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=ielr -Dparse.lac=full -o input.c input.y]],
553 [[0]], [[]],
554 [[input.y: conflicts: 2 shift/reduce
555 ]])
556 AT_COMPILE([[input]])
557 AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
558 [[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' or 'c'
559 ]])
560
561 AT_CLEANUP
562
563 ## ------------------------- ##
564 ## Unresolved SR Conflicts. ##
565 ## ------------------------- ##
566
567 AT_SETUP([Unresolved SR Conflicts])
568
569 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
570
571 AT_DATA([input.y],
572 [[%token NUM OP
573 %%
574 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
575 ]])
576
577 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
578 [input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
579 ])
580
581 # Check the contents of the report.
582 AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
583 [[State 5 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
584
585
586 Grammar
587
588 0 $accept: exp $end
589
590 1 exp: exp OP exp
591 2 | NUM
592
593
594 Terminals, with rules where they appear
595
596 $end (0) 0
597 error (256)
598 NUM (258) 2
599 OP (259) 1
600
601
602 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
603
604 $accept (5)
605 on left: 0
606 exp (6)
607 on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
608
609
610 state 0
611
612 0 $accept: . exp $end
613 1 exp: . exp OP exp
614 2 | . NUM
615
616 NUM shift, and go to state 1
617
618 exp go to state 2
619
620
621 state 1
622
623 2 exp: NUM .
624
625 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
626
627
628 state 2
629
630 0 $accept: exp . $end
631 1 exp: exp . OP exp
632
633 $end shift, and go to state 3
634 OP shift, and go to state 4
635
636
637 state 3
638
639 0 $accept: exp $end .
640
641 $default accept
642
643
644 state 4
645
646 1 exp: . exp OP exp
647 1 | exp OP . exp
648 2 | . NUM
649
650 NUM shift, and go to state 1
651
652 exp go to state 5
653
654
655 state 5
656
657 1 exp: exp . OP exp
658 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
659
660 OP shift, and go to state 4
661
662 OP [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
663 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
664 ]])
665
666 AT_CLEANUP
667
668
669
670 ## ----------------------- ##
671 ## Resolved SR Conflicts. ##
672 ## ----------------------- ##
673
674 AT_SETUP([Resolved SR Conflicts])
675
676 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
677
678 AT_DATA([input.y],
679 [[%token NUM OP
680 %left OP
681 %%
682 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
683 ]])
684
685 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y])
686
687 # Check the contents of the report.
688 AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
689 [[Grammar
690
691 0 $accept: exp $end
692
693 1 exp: exp OP exp
694 2 | NUM
695
696
697 Terminals, with rules where they appear
698
699 $end (0) 0
700 error (256)
701 NUM (258) 2
702 OP (259) 1
703
704
705 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
706
707 $accept (5)
708 on left: 0
709 exp (6)
710 on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
711
712
713 state 0
714
715 0 $accept: . exp $end
716 1 exp: . exp OP exp
717 2 | . NUM
718
719 NUM shift, and go to state 1
720
721 exp go to state 2
722
723
724 state 1
725
726 2 exp: NUM .
727
728 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
729
730
731 state 2
732
733 0 $accept: exp . $end
734 1 exp: exp . OP exp
735
736 $end shift, and go to state 3
737 OP shift, and go to state 4
738
739
740 state 3
741
742 0 $accept: exp $end .
743
744 $default accept
745
746
747 state 4
748
749 1 exp: . exp OP exp
750 1 | exp OP . exp
751 2 | . NUM
752
753 NUM shift, and go to state 1
754
755 exp go to state 5
756
757
758 state 5
759
760 1 exp: exp . OP exp
761 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
762
763 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
764
765 Conflict between rule 1 and token OP resolved as reduce (%left OP).
766 ]])
767
768 AT_CLEANUP
769
770
771 ## ---------------------- ##
772 ## %precedence suffices. ##
773 ## ---------------------- ##
774
775 AT_SETUP([%precedence suffices])
776
777 AT_DATA([input.y],
778 [[%precedence "then"
779 %precedence "else"
780 %%
781 stmt:
782 "if" cond "then" stmt
783 | "if" cond "then" stmt "else" stmt
784 | "stmt"
785 ;
786
787 cond:
788 "exp"
789 ;
790 ]])
791
792 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
793
794 AT_CLEANUP
795
796
797 ## ------------------------------ ##
798 ## %precedence does not suffice. ##
799 ## ------------------------------ ##
800
801 AT_SETUP([%precedence does not suffice])
802
803 AT_DATA([input.y],
804 [[%precedence "then"
805 %precedence "else"
806 %%
807 stmt:
808 "if" cond "then" stmt
809 | "if" cond "then" stmt "else" stmt
810 | "stmt"
811 ;
812
813 cond:
814 "exp"
815 | cond "then" cond
816 ;
817 ]])
818
819 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
820 [[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
821 input.y:12.3-18: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: cond: cond "then" cond
822 ]])
823
824 AT_CLEANUP
825
826
827 ## -------------------------------- ##
828 ## Defaulted Conflicted Reduction. ##
829 ## -------------------------------- ##
830
831 # When there are RR conflicts, some rules are disabled. Usually it is
832 # simply displayed as:
833 #
834 # $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
835 # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
836 #
837 # But when `reduce 3' is the default action, we'd produce:
838 #
839 # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
840 # $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
841 #
842 # In this precise case (a reduction is masked by the default
843 # reduction), we make the `reduce 3' explicit:
844 #
845 # $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
846 # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
847 # $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
848 #
849 # Maybe that's not the best display, but then, please propose something
850 # else.
851
852 AT_SETUP([Defaulted Conflicted Reduction])
853 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
854
855 AT_DATA([input.y],
856 [[%%
857 exp: num | id;
858 num: '0';
859 id : '0';
860 %%
861 ]])
862
863 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
864 [[input.y: conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
865 input.y:4.6-8: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: id: '0'
866 ]])
867
868 # Check the contents of the report.
869 AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
870 [[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts
871
872 4 id: '0'
873
874
875 State 1 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
876
877
878 Grammar
879
880 0 $accept: exp $end
881
882 1 exp: num
883 2 | id
884
885 3 num: '0'
886
887 4 id: '0'
888
889
890 Terminals, with rules where they appear
891
892 $end (0) 0
893 '0' (48) 3 4
894 error (256)
895
896
897 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
898
899 $accept (4)
900 on left: 0
901 exp (5)
902 on left: 1 2, on right: 0
903 num (6)
904 on left: 3, on right: 1
905 id (7)
906 on left: 4, on right: 2
907
908
909 state 0
910
911 0 $accept: . exp $end
912 1 exp: . num
913 2 | . id
914 3 num: . '0'
915 4 id: . '0'
916
917 '0' shift, and go to state 1
918
919 exp go to state 2
920 num go to state 3
921 id go to state 4
922
923
924 state 1
925
926 3 num: '0' . [$end]
927 4 id: '0' . [$end]
928
929 $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
930 $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
931 $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
932
933
934 state 2
935
936 0 $accept: exp . $end
937
938 $end shift, and go to state 5
939
940
941 state 3
942
943 1 exp: num .
944
945 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
946
947
948 state 4
949
950 2 exp: id .
951
952 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
953
954
955 state 5
956
957 0 $accept: exp $end .
958
959 $default accept
960 ]])
961
962 AT_CLEANUP
963
964
965
966
967 ## -------------------- ##
968 ## %expect not enough. ##
969 ## -------------------- ##
970
971 AT_SETUP([%expect not enough])
972
973 AT_DATA([input.y],
974 [[%token NUM OP
975 %expect 0
976 %%
977 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
978 ]])
979
980 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
981 [input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
982 input.y: expected 0 shift/reduce conflicts
983 ])
984 AT_CLEANUP
985
986
987 ## --------------- ##
988 ## %expect right. ##
989 ## --------------- ##
990
991 AT_SETUP([%expect right])
992
993 AT_DATA([input.y],
994 [[%token NUM OP
995 %expect 1
996 %%
997 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
998 ]])
999
1000 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1001 AT_CLEANUP
1002
1003
1004 ## ------------------ ##
1005 ## %expect too much. ##
1006 ## ------------------ ##
1007
1008 AT_SETUP([%expect too much])
1009
1010 AT_DATA([input.y],
1011 [[%token NUM OP
1012 %expect 2
1013 %%
1014 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
1015 ]])
1016
1017 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
1018 [input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
1019 input.y: expected 2 shift/reduce conflicts
1020 ])
1021 AT_CLEANUP
1022
1023
1024 ## ------------------------------- ##
1025 ## %expect with reduce conflicts. ##
1026 ## ------------------------------- ##
1027
1028 AT_SETUP([%expect with reduce conflicts])
1029
1030 AT_DATA([input.y],
1031 [[%expect 0
1032 %%
1033 program: a 'a' | a a;
1034 a: 'a';
1035 ]])
1036
1037 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
1038 [input.y: conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
1039 input.y: expected 0 reduce/reduce conflicts
1040 ])
1041 AT_CLEANUP
1042
1043
1044 ## ------------------------- ##
1045 ## %prec with user strings. ##
1046 ## ------------------------- ##
1047
1048 AT_SETUP([%prec with user string])
1049
1050 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1051 [[%%
1052 exp:
1053 "foo" %prec "foo"
1054 ;
1055 ]])
1056
1057 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1058 AT_CLEANUP
1059
1060
1061 ## -------------------------------- ##
1062 ## %no-default-prec without %prec. ##
1063 ## -------------------------------- ##
1064
1065 AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec without %prec])
1066
1067 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1068 [[%left '+'
1069 %left '*'
1070
1071 %%
1072
1073 %no-default-prec;
1074
1075 e: e '+' e
1076 | e '*' e
1077 | '0'
1078 ;
1079 ]])
1080
1081 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
1082 [[input.y: conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
1083 ]])
1084 AT_CLEANUP
1085
1086
1087 ## ----------------------------- ##
1088 ## %no-default-prec with %prec. ##
1089 ## ----------------------------- ##
1090
1091 AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec with %prec])
1092
1093 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1094 [[%left '+'
1095 %left '*'
1096
1097 %%
1098
1099 %no-default-prec;
1100
1101 e: e '+' e %prec '+'
1102 | e '*' e %prec '*'
1103 | '0'
1104 ;
1105 ]])
1106
1107 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1108 AT_CLEANUP
1109
1110
1111 ## --------------- ##
1112 ## %default-prec. ##
1113 ## --------------- ##
1114
1115 AT_SETUP([%default-prec])
1116
1117 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1118 [[%left '+'
1119 %left '*'
1120
1121 %%
1122
1123 %default-prec;
1124
1125 e: e '+' e
1126 | e '*' e
1127 | '0'
1128 ;
1129 ]])
1130
1131 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1132 AT_CLEANUP
1133
1134
1135 ## ---------------------------------------------- ##
1136 ## Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution. ##
1137 ## ---------------------------------------------- ##
1138
1139 AT_SETUP([[Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution]])
1140
1141 # If conflict resolution makes states unreachable, remove those states, report
1142 # rules that are then unused, and don't report conflicts in those states. Test
1143 # what happens when a nonterminal becomes useless as a result of state removal
1144 # since that causes lalr.o's goto map to be rewritten.
1145
1146 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1147 [[%output "input.c"
1148 %left 'a'
1149
1150 %%
1151
1152 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' ;
1153
1154 /* S/R conflict resolved as reduce, so the state with item
1155 * (resolved_conflict: 'a' . unreachable1) and all it transition successors are
1156 * unreachable, and the associated production is useless. */
1157 resolved_conflict:
1158 'a' unreachable1
1159 | %prec 'a'
1160 ;
1161
1162 /* S/R conflict that need not be reported since it is unreachable because of
1163 * the previous conflict resolution. Nonterminal unreachable1 and all its
1164 * productions are useless. */
1165 unreachable1:
1166 'a' unreachable2
1167 |
1168 ;
1169
1170 /* Likewise for a R/R conflict and nonterminal unreachable2. */
1171 unreachable2: | ;
1172
1173 /* Make sure remaining S/R and R/R conflicts are still reported correctly even
1174 * when their states are renumbered due to state removal. */
1175 reported_conflicts:
1176 'a'
1177 | 'a'
1178 |
1179 ;
1180
1181 ]])
1182
1183 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all input.y]], 0, [],
1184 [[input.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce, 1 reduce/reduce
1185 input.y:12.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
1186 input.y:20.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
1187 input.y:21.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: /* empty */
1188 input.y:25.13: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */
1189 input.y:25.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */
1190 input.y:31.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: 'a'
1191 input.y:32.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: /* empty */
1192 ]])
1193
1194 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output]], 0,
1195 [[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts
1196
1197 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
1198
1199 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
1200 5 | /* empty */
1201
1202 6 unreachable2: /* empty */
1203 7 | /* empty */
1204
1205 9 reported_conflicts: 'a'
1206 10 | /* empty */
1207
1208
1209 State 4 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
1210 State 5 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
1211
1212
1213 Grammar
1214
1215 0 $accept: start $end
1216
1217 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
1218
1219 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
1220 3 | /* empty */
1221
1222 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
1223 5 | /* empty */
1224
1225 6 unreachable2: /* empty */
1226 7 | /* empty */
1227
1228 8 reported_conflicts: 'a'
1229 9 | 'a'
1230 10 | /* empty */
1231
1232
1233 Terminals, with rules where they appear
1234
1235 $end (0) 0
1236 'a' (97) 1 2 4 8 9
1237 error (256)
1238
1239
1240 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
1241
1242 $accept (4)
1243 on left: 0
1244 start (5)
1245 on left: 1, on right: 0
1246 resolved_conflict (6)
1247 on left: 2 3, on right: 1
1248 unreachable1 (7)
1249 on left: 4 5, on right: 2
1250 unreachable2 (8)
1251 on left: 6 7, on right: 4
1252 reported_conflicts (9)
1253 on left: 8 9 10, on right: 1
1254
1255
1256 state 0
1257
1258 0 $accept: . start $end
1259 1 start: . resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
1260 2 resolved_conflict: . 'a' unreachable1
1261 3 | . ['a']
1262
1263 $default reduce using rule 3 (resolved_conflict)
1264
1265 start go to state 1
1266 resolved_conflict go to state 2
1267
1268 Conflict between rule 3 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
1269
1270
1271 state 1
1272
1273 0 $accept: start . $end
1274
1275 $end shift, and go to state 3
1276
1277
1278 state 2
1279
1280 1 start: resolved_conflict . 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
1281
1282 'a' shift, and go to state 4
1283
1284
1285 state 3
1286
1287 0 $accept: start $end .
1288
1289 $default accept
1290
1291
1292 state 4
1293
1294 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' . reported_conflicts 'a'
1295 8 reported_conflicts: . 'a'
1296 9 | . 'a'
1297 10 | . ['a']
1298
1299 'a' shift, and go to state 5
1300
1301 'a' [reduce using rule 10 (reported_conflicts)]
1302
1303 reported_conflicts go to state 6
1304
1305
1306 state 5
1307
1308 8 reported_conflicts: 'a' . ['a']
1309 9 | 'a' . ['a']
1310
1311 'a' reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
1312 'a' [reduce using rule 9 (reported_conflicts)]
1313 $default reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
1314
1315
1316 state 6
1317
1318 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts . 'a'
1319
1320 'a' shift, and go to state 7
1321
1322
1323 state 7
1324
1325 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' .
1326
1327 $default reduce using rule 1 (start)
1328 ]])
1329
1330 AT_DATA([[input-keep.y]],
1331 [[%define lr.keep-unreachable-states
1332 ]])
1333 AT_CHECK([[cat input.y >> input-keep.y]])
1334
1335 AT_BISON_CHECK([[input-keep.y]], 0, [],
1336 [[input-keep.y: conflicts: 2 shift/reduce, 2 reduce/reduce
1337 input-keep.y:22.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: /* empty */
1338 input-keep.y:26.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */
1339 input-keep.y:32.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: 'a'
1340 input-keep.y:33.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: /* empty */
1341 ]])
1342
1343 AT_CLEANUP
1344
1345
1346 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1347 ## Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state. ##
1348 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1349
1350 AT_SETUP([[Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state]])
1351
1352 # Used to lose earlier solved conflict messages even within a single S/R/R.
1353
1354 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1355 [[%left 'a'
1356 %right 'b'
1357 %right 'c'
1358 %right 'd'
1359 %%
1360 start:
1361 'a'
1362 | empty_a 'a'
1363 | 'b'
1364 | empty_b 'b'
1365 | 'c'
1366 | empty_c1 'c'
1367 | empty_c2 'c'
1368 | empty_c3 'c'
1369 ;
1370 empty_a: %prec 'a' ;
1371 empty_b: %prec 'b' ;
1372 empty_c1: %prec 'c' ;
1373 empty_c2: %prec 'c' ;
1374 empty_c3: %prec 'd' ;
1375 ]])
1376 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
1377 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^state 0$/,/^state 1$/p']], 0,
1378 [[state 0
1379
1380 0 $accept: . start $end
1381 1 start: . 'a'
1382 2 | . empty_a 'a'
1383 3 | . 'b'
1384 4 | . empty_b 'b'
1385 5 | . 'c'
1386 6 | . empty_c1 'c'
1387 7 | . empty_c2 'c'
1388 8 | . empty_c3 'c'
1389 9 empty_a: . ['a']
1390 10 empty_b: . []
1391 11 empty_c1: . []
1392 12 empty_c2: . []
1393 13 empty_c3: . ['c']
1394
1395 'b' shift, and go to state 1
1396
1397 'c' reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)
1398 $default reduce using rule 9 (empty_a)
1399
1400 start go to state 2
1401 empty_a go to state 3
1402 empty_b go to state 4
1403 empty_c1 go to state 5
1404 empty_c2 go to state 6
1405 empty_c3 go to state 7
1406
1407 Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
1408 Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as shift (%right 'b').
1409 Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c').
1410 Conflict between rule 12 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c').
1411 Conflict between rule 13 and token 'c' resolved as reduce ('c' < 'd').
1412
1413
1414 state 1
1415 ]])
1416
1417 AT_CLEANUP
1418
1419
1420 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1421 ## %nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state. ##
1422 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1423
1424 # Used to abort when trying to resolve conflicts as %nonassoc error actions for
1425 # multiple reductions in a state.
1426
1427 # For a %nonassoc error action token, used to print the first remaining
1428 # reduction on that token without brackets.
1429
1430 AT_SETUP([[%nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state]])
1431
1432 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1433 [[%nonassoc 'a' 'b' 'c'
1434 %%
1435 start:
1436 'a'
1437 | empty_a 'a'
1438 | 'b'
1439 | empty_b 'b'
1440 | 'c'
1441 | empty_c1 'c'
1442 | empty_c2 'c'
1443 | empty_c3 'c'
1444 ;
1445 empty_a: %prec 'a' ;
1446 empty_b: %prec 'b' ;
1447 empty_c1: %prec 'c' ;
1448 empty_c2: %prec 'c' ;
1449 empty_c3: %prec 'c' ;
1450 ]])
1451
1452 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
1453 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^state 0$/,/^state 1$/p']], 0,
1454 [[state 0
1455
1456 0 $accept: . start $end
1457 1 start: . 'a'
1458 2 | . empty_a 'a'
1459 3 | . 'b'
1460 4 | . empty_b 'b'
1461 5 | . 'c'
1462 6 | . empty_c1 'c'
1463 7 | . empty_c2 'c'
1464 8 | . empty_c3 'c'
1465 9 empty_a: . []
1466 10 empty_b: . []
1467 11 empty_c1: . []
1468 12 empty_c2: . ['c']
1469 13 empty_c3: . ['c']
1470
1471 'a' error (nonassociative)
1472 'b' error (nonassociative)
1473 'c' error (nonassociative)
1474
1475 'c' [reduce using rule 12 (empty_c2)]
1476 'c' [reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)]
1477
1478 start go to state 1
1479 empty_a go to state 2
1480 empty_b go to state 3
1481 empty_c1 go to state 4
1482 empty_c2 go to state 5
1483 empty_c3 go to state 6
1484
1485 Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'a').
1486 Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'b').
1487 Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'c').
1488
1489
1490 state 1
1491 ]])
1492 AT_CLEANUP
1493
1494
1495 ## --------------------------------- ##
1496 ## -W versus %expect and %expect-rr ##
1497 ## --------------------------------- ##
1498
1499 AT_SETUP([[-W versus %expect and %expect-rr]])
1500
1501 AT_DATA([[sr-rr.y]],
1502 [[%glr-parser
1503 %%
1504 start: 'a' | A 'a' | B 'a' ;
1505 A: ;
1506 B: ;
1507 ]])
1508 AT_DATA([[sr.y]],
1509 [[%glr-parser
1510 %%
1511 start: 'a' | A 'a' ;
1512 A: ;
1513 ]])
1514 AT_DATA([[rr.y]],
1515 [[%glr-parser
1516 %%
1517 start: A | B ;
1518 A: ;
1519 B: ;
1520 ]])
1521
1522 AT_BISON_CHECK([[sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
1523 [[sr-rr.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce, 1 reduce/reduce
1524 ]])
1525 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wno-conflicts-sr sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
1526 [[sr-rr.y: conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
1527 ]])
1528 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wno-conflicts-rr sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
1529 [[sr-rr.y: conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
1530 ]])
1531
1532 [for gram in sr-rr sr rr; do
1533 for sr_exp_i in '' 0 1 2; do
1534 for rr_exp_i in '' 0 1 2; do
1535 test -z "$sr_exp_i" && test -z "$rr_exp_i" && continue
1536
1537 # Build grammar file.
1538 sr_exp=0
1539 rr_exp=0
1540 file=$gram
1541 directives=
1542 if test -n "$sr_exp_i"; then
1543 sr_exp=$sr_exp_i
1544 file=$file-expect-$sr_exp
1545 directives="%expect $sr_exp"
1546 fi
1547 if test -n "$rr_exp_i"; then
1548 rr_exp=$rr_exp_i
1549 file=$file-expect-rr-$rr_exp
1550 directives="$directives %expect-rr $rr_exp"
1551 fi
1552 file=$file.y
1553 echo "$directives" > $file
1554 cat $gram.y >> $file
1555
1556 # Count actual conflicts.
1557 conflicts=
1558 sr_count=0
1559 rr_count=0
1560 if test $gram = sr || test $gram = sr-rr; then
1561 conflicts="1 shift/reduce"
1562 sr_count=1
1563 fi
1564 if test $gram = rr || test $gram = sr-rr; then
1565 if test -n "$conflicts"; then
1566 conflicts="$conflicts, "
1567 fi
1568 conflicts="${conflicts}1 reduce/reduce"
1569 rr_count=1
1570 fi
1571
1572 # Run tests.
1573 if test $sr_count -eq $sr_exp && test $rr_count -eq $rr_exp; then
1574 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wnone $file]])[
1575 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Werror $file]])[
1576 else
1577 echo "$file: conflicts: $conflicts" > experr
1578 if test $sr_count -ne $sr_exp; then
1579 if test $sr_exp -ne 1; then s=s; else s= ; fi
1580 echo "$file: expected $sr_exp shift/reduce conflict$s" >> experr
1581 fi
1582 if test $rr_count -ne $rr_exp; then
1583 if test $rr_exp -ne 1; then s=s; else s= ; fi
1584 echo "$file: expected $rr_exp reduce/reduce conflict$s" >> experr
1585 fi
1586 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wnone $file]], [[1]], [[]], [[experr]])[
1587 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Werror $file]], [[1]], [[]], [[experr]])[
1588 fi
1589 done
1590 done
1591 done]
1592
1593 AT_CLEANUP