]> git.saurik.com Git - bison.git/blame - TODO
More.
[bison.git] / TODO
CommitLineData
416bd7a9
MA
1-*- outline -*-
2
eaff5ee3 3* Coding system independence
4358321a 4Paul notes:
eaff5ee3
AD
5
6 Currently Bison assumes 8-bit bytes (i.e. that UCHAR_MAX is
7 255). It also assumes that the 8-bit character encoding is
8 the same for the invocation of 'bison' as it is for the
9 invocation of 'cc', but this is not necessarily true when
10 people run bison on an ASCII host and then use cc on an EBCDIC
11 host. I don't think these topics are worth our time
12 addressing (unless we find a gung-ho volunteer for EBCDIC or
13 PDP-10 ports :-) but they should probably be documented
14 somewhere.
15
16* Using enums instead of int for tokens.
17Paul suggests:
18
19 #ifndef YYTOKENTYPE
20 # if defined (__STDC__) || defined (__cplusplus)
21 /* Put the tokens into the symbol table, so that GDB and other debuggers
22 know about them. */
23 enum yytokentype {
24 FOO = 256,
25 BAR,
26 ...
27 };
28 /* POSIX requires `int' for tokens in interfaces. */
29 # define YYTOKENTYPE int
30 # endif
31 #endif
32 #define FOO 256
33 #define BAR 257
34 ...
35
4358321a
AD
36> I'm in favor of
37>
38> %token FOO 256
39> %token BAR 257
40>
41> and Bison moves error into 258.
42
43Yes, I think that's a valid extension too, if the user doesn't define
44the token number for error.
45
fa770c86
AD
46* Unit rules
47Maybe we could expand unit rules, i.e., transform
48
49 exp: arith | bool;
50 arith: exp '+' exp;
51 bool: exp '&' exp;
52
53into
54
55 exp: exp '+' exp | exp '&' exp;
56
57when there are no actions. This can significantly speed up some
58grammars.
59
51dec47b
AD
60* Stupid error messages
61An example shows it easily:
62
63src/bison/tests % ./testsuite -k calc,location,error-verbose -l
64GNU Bison 1.49a test suite test groups:
65
66 NUM: FILENAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME
67 KEYWORDS
68
69 51: calc.at:440 Calculator --locations --yyerror-verbose
70 52: calc.at:442 Calculator --defines --locations --name-prefix=calc --verbose --yacc --yyerror-verbose
71 54: calc.at:445 Calculator --debug --defines --locations --name-prefix=calc --verbose --yacc --yyerror-verbose
72src/bison/tests % ./testsuite 51 -d
73## --------------------------- ##
74## GNU Bison 1.49a test suite. ##
75## --------------------------- ##
76 51: calc.at:440 ok
77## ---------------------------- ##
78## All 1 tests were successful. ##
79## ---------------------------- ##
80src/bison/tests % cd ./testsuite.dir/51
81tests/testsuite.dir/51 % echo "()" | ./calc
821.2-1.3: parse error, unexpected ')', expecting error or "number" or '-' or '('
fa770c86
AD
83
84* read_pipe.c
85This is not portable to DOS for instance. Implement a more portable
86scheme. Sources of inspiration include GNU diff, and Free Recode.
87
aef1ffd5
AD
88* Memory leaks in the generator
89A round of memory leak clean ups would be most welcome. Dmalloc,
90Checker GCC, Electric Fence, or Valgrind: you chose your tool.
91
92* Memory leaks in the parser
93The same applies to the generated parsers. In particular, this is
94critical for user data: when aborting a parsing, when handling the
95error token etc., we often throw away yylval without giving a chance
96of cleaning it up to the user.
97
52d1aeee
MA
98* NEWS
99Sort from 1.31 NEWS.
100
bcb05e75
MA
101* Prologue
102The %union is declared after the user C declarations. It can be
704a47c4 103a problem if YYSTYPE is declared after the user part. []
bcb05e75 104
704a47c4
AD
105Actually, the real problem seems that the %union ought to be output
106where it was defined. For instance, in gettext/intl/plural.y, we
107have:
108
109 %{
110 ...
111 #include "gettextP.h"
112 ...
113 %}
114
115 %union {
116 unsigned long int num;
117 enum operator op;
118 struct expression *exp;
119 }
120
121 %{
122 ...
123 static int yylex PARAMS ((YYSTYPE *lval, const char **pexp));
124 ...
125 %}
126
127Where the first part defines struct expression, the second uses it to
128define YYSTYPE, and the last uses YYSTYPE. Only this order is valid.
bcb05e75
MA
129
130* --graph
131Show reductions. []
132
704a47c4 133* Broken options ?
c3995d99 134** %no-lines [ok]
04a76783 135** %no-parser []
fbbf9b3b 136** %pure-parser []
04a76783
MA
137** %semantic-parser []
138** %token-table []
139** Options which could use parse_dquoted_param ().
140Maybe transfered in lex.c.
141*** %skeleton [ok]
142*** %output []
143*** %file-prefix []
144*** %name-prefix []
ec93a213 145
fbbf9b3b 146** Skeleton strategy. []
c3a8cbaa
MA
147Must we keep %no-parser?
148 %token-table?
fbbf9b3b 149*** New skeletons. []
416bd7a9 150
c111e171 151* src/print_graph.c
31b53af2 152Find the best graph parameters. []
63c2d5de
MA
153
154* doc/bison.texinfo
1a4648ff 155** Update
c3a8cbaa 156informations about ERROR_VERBOSE. []
1a4648ff 157** Add explainations about
c3a8cbaa
MA
158skeleton muscles. []
159%skeleton. []
eeeb962b 160
704a47c4 161* testsuite
c3a8cbaa
MA
162** tests/pure-parser.at []
163New tests.
0f8d586a
AD
164
165* Debugging parsers
166
167From Greg McGary:
168
169akim demaille <akim.demaille@epita.fr> writes:
170
171> With great pleasure! Nonetheless, things which are debatable
172> (or not, but just `big') should be discuss in `public': something
173> like help- or bug-bison@gnu.org is just fine. Jesse and I are there,
174> but there is also Jim and some other people.
175
176I have no idea whether it qualifies as big or controversial, so I'll
177just summarize for you. I proposed this change years ago and was
178surprised that it was met with utter indifference!
179
180This debug feature is for the programs/grammars one develops with
181bison, not for debugging bison itself. I find that the YYDEBUG
182output comes in a very inconvenient format for my purposes.
183When debugging gcc, for instance, what I want is to see a trace of
184the sequence of reductions and the line#s for the semantic actions
185so I can follow what's happening. Single-step in gdb doesn't cut it
186because to move from one semantic action to the next takes you through
187lots of internal machinery of the parser, which is uninteresting.
188
189The change I made was to the format of the debug output, so that it
190comes out in the format of C error messages, digestible by emacs
191compile mode, like so:
192
193grammar.y:1234: foo: bar(0x123456) baz(0x345678)
194
195where "foo: bar baz" is the reduction rule, whose semantic action
196appears on line 1234 of the bison grammar file grammar.y. The hex
197numbers on the rhs tokens are the parse-stack values associated with
198those tokens. Of course, yytype might be something totally
199incompatible with that representation, but for the most part, yytype
200values are single words (scalars or pointers). In the case of gcc,
201they're most often pointers to tree nodes. Come to think of it, the
202right thing to do is to make the printing of stack values be
203user-definable. It would also be useful to include the filename &
204line# of the file being parsed, but the main filename & line# should
205continue to be that of grammar.y
206
207Anyway, this feature has saved my life on numerous occasions. The way
208I customarily use it is to first run bison with the traces on, isolate
209the sequence of reductions that interests me, put those traces in a
210buffer and force it into compile-mode, then visit each of those lines
211in the grammar and set breakpoints with C-x SPACE. Then, I can run
212again under the control of gdb and stop at each semantic action.
213With the hex addresses of tree nodes, I can inspect the values
214associated with any rhs token.
215
216You like?
cd6a695e
AD
217
218* input synclines
219Some users create their foo.y files, and equip them with #line. Bison
220should recognize these, and preserve them.
0e95c1dd
AD
221
222* BTYacc
223See if we can integrate backtracking in Bison. Contact the BTYacc
224maintainers.
225
226* Automaton report
227Display more clearly the lookaheads for each item.
228
229* RR conflicts
230See if we can use precedence between rules to solve RR conflicts. See
231what POSIX says.
232
233* Precedence
234It is unfortunate that there is a total order for precedence. It
235makes it impossible to have modular precedence information. We should
236move to partial orders.
237
238* Parsing grammars
239Rewrite the reader in Bison.