]>
Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
1 | -*- outline -*- | |
2 | ||
3 | * Coding system independence | |
4 | Paul notes: | |
5 | ||
6 | Currently Bison assumes 8-bit bytes (i.e. that UCHAR_MAX is | |
7 | 255). It also assumes that the 8-bit character encoding is | |
8 | the same for the invocation of 'bison' as it is for the | |
9 | invocation of 'cc', but this is not necessarily true when | |
10 | people run bison on an ASCII host and then use cc on an EBCDIC | |
11 | host. I don't think these topics are worth our time | |
12 | addressing (unless we find a gung-ho volunteer for EBCDIC or | |
13 | PDP-10 ports :-) but they should probably be documented | |
14 | somewhere. | |
15 | ||
16 | * Using enums instead of int for tokens. | |
17 | Paul suggests: | |
18 | ||
19 | #ifndef YYTOKENTYPE | |
20 | # if defined (__STDC__) || defined (__cplusplus) | |
21 | /* Put the tokens into the symbol table, so that GDB and other debuggers | |
22 | know about them. */ | |
23 | enum yytokentype { | |
24 | FOO = 256, | |
25 | BAR, | |
26 | ... | |
27 | }; | |
28 | /* POSIX requires `int' for tokens in interfaces. */ | |
29 | # define YYTOKENTYPE int | |
30 | # endif | |
31 | #endif | |
32 | #define FOO 256 | |
33 | #define BAR 257 | |
34 | ... | |
35 | ||
36 | > I'm in favor of | |
37 | > | |
38 | > %token FOO 256 | |
39 | > %token BAR 257 | |
40 | > | |
41 | > and Bison moves error into 258. | |
42 | ||
43 | Yes, I think that's a valid extension too, if the user doesn't define | |
44 | the token number for error. | |
45 | ||
46 | * Unit rules | |
47 | Maybe we could expand unit rules, i.e., transform | |
48 | ||
49 | exp: arith | bool; | |
50 | arith: exp '+' exp; | |
51 | bool: exp '&' exp; | |
52 | ||
53 | into | |
54 | ||
55 | exp: exp '+' exp | exp '&' exp; | |
56 | ||
57 | when there are no actions. This can significantly speed up some | |
58 | grammars. | |
59 | ||
60 | * Stupid error messages | |
61 | An example shows it easily: | |
62 | ||
63 | src/bison/tests % ./testsuite -k calc,location,error-verbose -l | |
64 | GNU Bison 1.49a test suite test groups: | |
65 | ||
66 | NUM: FILENAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME | |
67 | KEYWORDS | |
68 | ||
69 | 51: calc.at:440 Calculator --locations --yyerror-verbose | |
70 | 52: calc.at:442 Calculator --defines --locations --name-prefix=calc --verbose --yacc --yyerror-verbose | |
71 | 54: calc.at:445 Calculator --debug --defines --locations --name-prefix=calc --verbose --yacc --yyerror-verbose | |
72 | src/bison/tests % ./testsuite 51 -d | |
73 | ## --------------------------- ## | |
74 | ## GNU Bison 1.49a test suite. ## | |
75 | ## --------------------------- ## | |
76 | 51: calc.at:440 ok | |
77 | ## ---------------------------- ## | |
78 | ## All 1 tests were successful. ## | |
79 | ## ---------------------------- ## | |
80 | src/bison/tests % cd ./testsuite.dir/51 | |
81 | tests/testsuite.dir/51 % echo "()" | ./calc | |
82 | 1.2-1.3: parse error, unexpected ')', expecting error or "number" or '-' or '(' | |
83 | ||
84 | * read_pipe.c | |
85 | This is not portable to DOS for instance. Implement a more portable | |
86 | scheme. Sources of inspiration include GNU diff, and Free Recode. | |
87 | ||
88 | * Memory leaks in the generator | |
89 | A round of memory leak clean ups would be most welcome. Dmalloc, | |
90 | Checker GCC, Electric Fence, or Valgrind: you chose your tool. | |
91 | ||
92 | * Memory leaks in the parser | |
93 | The same applies to the generated parsers. In particular, this is | |
94 | critical for user data: when aborting a parsing, when handling the | |
95 | error token etc., we often throw away yylval without giving a chance | |
96 | of cleaning it up to the user. | |
97 | ||
98 | * NEWS | |
99 | Sort from 1.31 NEWS. | |
100 | ||
101 | * Prologue | |
102 | The %union is declared after the user C declarations. It can be | |
103 | a problem if YYSTYPE is declared after the user part. [] | |
104 | ||
105 | Actually, the real problem seems that the %union ought to be output | |
106 | where it was defined. For instance, in gettext/intl/plural.y, we | |
107 | have: | |
108 | ||
109 | %{ | |
110 | ... | |
111 | #include "gettextP.h" | |
112 | ... | |
113 | %} | |
114 | ||
115 | %union { | |
116 | unsigned long int num; | |
117 | enum operator op; | |
118 | struct expression *exp; | |
119 | } | |
120 | ||
121 | %{ | |
122 | ... | |
123 | static int yylex PARAMS ((YYSTYPE *lval, const char **pexp)); | |
124 | ... | |
125 | %} | |
126 | ||
127 | Where the first part defines struct expression, the second uses it to | |
128 | define YYSTYPE, and the last uses YYSTYPE. Only this order is valid. | |
129 | ||
130 | * --graph | |
131 | Show reductions. [] | |
132 | ||
133 | * Broken options ? | |
134 | ** %no-lines [ok] | |
135 | ** %no-parser [] | |
136 | ** %pure-parser [] | |
137 | ** %semantic-parser [] | |
138 | ** %token-table [] | |
139 | ** Options which could use parse_dquoted_param (). | |
140 | Maybe transfered in lex.c. | |
141 | *** %skeleton [ok] | |
142 | *** %output [] | |
143 | *** %file-prefix [] | |
144 | *** %name-prefix [] | |
145 | ||
146 | ** Skeleton strategy. [] | |
147 | Must we keep %no-parser? | |
148 | %token-table? | |
149 | *** New skeletons. [] | |
150 | ||
151 | * src/print_graph.c | |
152 | Find the best graph parameters. [] | |
153 | ||
154 | * doc/bison.texinfo | |
155 | ** Update | |
156 | informations about ERROR_VERBOSE. [] | |
157 | ** Add explainations about | |
158 | skeleton muscles. [] | |
159 | %skeleton. [] | |
160 | ||
161 | * testsuite | |
162 | ** tests/pure-parser.at [] | |
163 | New tests. | |
164 | ||
165 | * Debugging parsers | |
166 | ||
167 | From Greg McGary: | |
168 | ||
169 | akim demaille <akim.demaille@epita.fr> writes: | |
170 | ||
171 | > With great pleasure! Nonetheless, things which are debatable | |
172 | > (or not, but just `big') should be discuss in `public': something | |
173 | > like help- or bug-bison@gnu.org is just fine. Jesse and I are there, | |
174 | > but there is also Jim and some other people. | |
175 | ||
176 | I have no idea whether it qualifies as big or controversial, so I'll | |
177 | just summarize for you. I proposed this change years ago and was | |
178 | surprised that it was met with utter indifference! | |
179 | ||
180 | This debug feature is for the programs/grammars one develops with | |
181 | bison, not for debugging bison itself. I find that the YYDEBUG | |
182 | output comes in a very inconvenient format for my purposes. | |
183 | When debugging gcc, for instance, what I want is to see a trace of | |
184 | the sequence of reductions and the line#s for the semantic actions | |
185 | so I can follow what's happening. Single-step in gdb doesn't cut it | |
186 | because to move from one semantic action to the next takes you through | |
187 | lots of internal machinery of the parser, which is uninteresting. | |
188 | ||
189 | The change I made was to the format of the debug output, so that it | |
190 | comes out in the format of C error messages, digestible by emacs | |
191 | compile mode, like so: | |
192 | ||
193 | grammar.y:1234: foo: bar(0x123456) baz(0x345678) | |
194 | ||
195 | where "foo: bar baz" is the reduction rule, whose semantic action | |
196 | appears on line 1234 of the bison grammar file grammar.y. The hex | |
197 | numbers on the rhs tokens are the parse-stack values associated with | |
198 | those tokens. Of course, yytype might be something totally | |
199 | incompatible with that representation, but for the most part, yytype | |
200 | values are single words (scalars or pointers). In the case of gcc, | |
201 | they're most often pointers to tree nodes. Come to think of it, the | |
202 | right thing to do is to make the printing of stack values be | |
203 | user-definable. It would also be useful to include the filename & | |
204 | line# of the file being parsed, but the main filename & line# should | |
205 | continue to be that of grammar.y | |
206 | ||
207 | Anyway, this feature has saved my life on numerous occasions. The way | |
208 | I customarily use it is to first run bison with the traces on, isolate | |
209 | the sequence of reductions that interests me, put those traces in a | |
210 | buffer and force it into compile-mode, then visit each of those lines | |
211 | in the grammar and set breakpoints with C-x SPACE. Then, I can run | |
212 | again under the control of gdb and stop at each semantic action. | |
213 | With the hex addresses of tree nodes, I can inspect the values | |
214 | associated with any rhs token. | |
215 | ||
216 | You like? | |
217 | ||
218 | * input synclines | |
219 | Some users create their foo.y files, and equip them with #line. Bison | |
220 | should recognize these, and preserve them. | |
221 | ||
222 | * BTYacc | |
223 | See if we can integrate backtracking in Bison. Contact the BTYacc | |
224 | maintainers. | |
225 | ||
226 | * Automaton report | |
227 | Display more clearly the lookaheads for each item. | |
228 | ||
229 | * RR conflicts | |
230 | See if we can use precedence between rules to solve RR conflicts. See | |
231 | what POSIX says. | |
232 | ||
233 | * Precedence | |
234 | It is unfortunate that there is a total order for precedence. It | |
235 | makes it impossible to have modular precedence information. We should | |
236 | move to partial orders. | |
237 | ||
238 | * Parsing grammars | |
239 | Rewrite the reader in Bison. |