apt_preferences and deb822-style sources used the specialized class
pkgUserTagSection to deal with comments before/after a given stanza, but
it couldn't deal with comments in the stanza at all.
codesearch suggests that nobody else does and a vastely superior way of
working with potentially commented files is implemented now, so we can
officially discourage the use of the old incomplete hack class.
return true;
FileFd Fd(File,FileFd::ReadOnly);
return true;
FileFd Fd(File,FileFd::ReadOnly);
+ pkgTagFile TF(&Fd, pkgTagFile::SUPPORT_COMMENTS);
if (Fd.IsOpen() == false || Fd.Failed())
return false;
if (Fd.IsOpen() == false || Fd.Failed())
return false;
- pkgUserTagSection Tags;
while (TF.Step(Tags) == true)
{
// can happen when there are only comments in a record
while (TF.Step(Tags) == true)
{
// can happen when there are only comments in a record
/* Returns: the number of stanzas parsed*/
bool pkgSourceList::ParseFileDeb822(string const &File)
{
/* Returns: the number of stanzas parsed*/
bool pkgSourceList::ParseFileDeb822(string const &File)
{
- pkgUserTagSection Tags;
unsigned int i = 1;
// see if we can read the file
FileFd Fd(File, FileFd::ReadOnly);
unsigned int i = 1;
// see if we can read the file
FileFd Fd(File, FileFd::ReadOnly);
- pkgTagFile Sources(&Fd);
+ pkgTagFile Sources(&Fd, pkgTagFile::SUPPORT_COMMENTS);
if (Fd.IsOpen() == false || Fd.Failed())
return _error->Error(_("Malformed stanza %u in source list %s (type)"),i,File.c_str());
// read step by step
if (Fd.IsOpen() == false || Fd.Failed())
return _error->Error(_("Malformed stanza %u in source list %s (type)"),i,File.c_str());
// read step by step
while (Sources.Step(Tags) == true)
{
if(Tags.Exists("Types") == false)
while (Sources.Step(Tags) == true)
{
if(Tags.Exists("Types") == false)
-/* For user generated file the parser should be a bit more relaxed in exchange
- for being a bit slower to allow comments and new lines all over the place */
-class pkgUserTagSection : public pkgTagSection
+class APT_DEPRECATED_MSG("Use pkgTagFile with the SUPPORT_COMMENTS flag instead") pkgUserTagSection : public pkgTagSection
{
virtual void TrimRecord(bool BeforeRecord, const char* &End) APT_OVERRIDE;
};
{
virtual void TrimRecord(bool BeforeRecord, const char* &End) APT_OVERRIDE;
};
URIs: http://ftp.debian.org/debian
Suites: stable
Components: main
Description: summay
URIs: http://ftp.debian.org/debian
Suites: stable
Components: main
Description: summay
and the long part'
msgcleantest() {
and the long part'
msgcleantest() {
testfailureequal "Reading package lists...
E: No priority (or zero) specified for pin" \
aptget install -s coolstuff -o PinPriority=0
testfailureequal "Reading package lists...
E: No priority (or zero) specified for pin" \
aptget install -s coolstuff -o PinPriority=0
+
+# Check with comments
+echo "#Package: coolstuff
+#Pin: release n=backports
+#Pin-Priority: 0
+
+# Test
+
+Package: coolstuff
+Pin: release n=backports
+#Pin: release n=unstable
+#Pin-Priority: 999
+Pin-Priority: 999
+#Pin-Priority: 999" > rootdir/etc/apt/preferences
+
+testsuccessequal "coolstuff:
+ Installed: 2.0~bpo1
+ Candidate: 2.0~bpo2
+ Version table:
+ 2.0~bpo2 999
+ 100 file:${tmppath}/aptarchive backports/main all Packages
+ *** 2.0~bpo1 100
+ 100 ${tmppath}/rootdir/var/lib/dpkg/status
+ 1.0 500
+ 500 file:${tmppath}/aptarchive stable/main all Packages" aptcache policy coolstuff