essantial package above most other packages but low enough
to allow an obsolete essential packages to be removed by
a conflicts on a powerfull normal package (ie libc6) */
- if ((I->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Essential) == pkgCache::Flag::Essential)
+ if ((I->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Essential) == pkgCache::Flag::Essential
+ || (I->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Important) == pkgCache::Flag::Important)
Score += PrioEssentials;
// We transform the priority
{
if ((Flags[I->ID] & Protected) != 0)
Scores[I->ID] += AddProtected;
- if ((I->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Essential) == pkgCache::Flag::Essential)
+ if ((I->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Essential) == pkgCache::Flag::Essential ||
+ (I->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Important) == pkgCache::Flag::Important)
Scores[I->ID] += AddEssential;
}
}
if ((L.ParentPkg()->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Essential) != pkgCache::Flag::Essential &&
(R.ParentPkg()->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Essential) == pkgCache::Flag::Essential)
return -1;
+
+ if ((L.ParentPkg()->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Important) == pkgCache::Flag::Important &&
+ (R.ParentPkg()->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Important) != pkgCache::Flag::Important)
+ return 1;
+ if ((L.ParentPkg()->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Important) != pkgCache::Flag::Important &&
+ (R.ParentPkg()->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Important) == pkgCache::Flag::Important)
+ return -1;
if (L->Priority != R->Priority)
return R->Priority - L->Priority;
else if ((B->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Essential) == pkgCache::Flag::Essential)
return true;
}
+ if ((A->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Important) != (B->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Important))
+ {
+ if ((A->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Important) == pkgCache::Flag::Important)
+ return false;
+ else if ((B->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Important) == pkgCache::Flag::Important)
+ return true;
+ }
// higher priority seems like a good idea
if (AV->Priority != BV->Priority)
return AV->Priority < BV->Priority;
{
if(!(PkgState[p->ID].Flags & Flag::Auto) ||
(p->Flags & Flag::Essential) ||
+ (p->Flags & Flag::Important) ||
userFunc.InRootSet(p) ||
// be nice even then a required package violates the policy (#583517)
// and do the full mark process also for required packages
// Essential packages get special treatment
bool IsEssential = false;
- if ((Pkg->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Essential) != 0)
+ if ((Pkg->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Essential) != 0 ||
+ (Pkg->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Important) != 0)
IsEssential = true;
/* Check for packages that are the dependents of essential packages and
for (DepIterator D = Pkg.RevDependsList(); D.end() == false &&
IsEssential == false; ++D)
if (D->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Depends || D->Type == pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends)
- if ((D.ParentPkg()->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Essential) != 0)
+ if ((D.ParentPkg()->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Essential) != 0 ||
+ (D.ParentPkg()->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Important) != 0)
IsEssential = true;
}
- Set the Essential flag on APT instead of only Important
* apt-pkg/packagemanager.cc:
- Do not use immediate configuration for packages with the Important flag
+ * Treat the Important flag like the Essential flag with two differences:
+ - No Immediate configuration (see above)
+ - Not automatically installed during dist-upgrade
-- David Kalnischkies <kalnischkies@gmail.com> Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:17:09 +0100