std::map<std::string, std::string>::const_iterator K;
LocalitySortedVersionSet bag;
- OpTextProgress progress;
+ OpTextProgress progress(*_config);
progress.OverallProgress(0, 100, 50, _("Sorting"));
GetLocalitySortedVersionSet(CacheFile, bag, progress);
LocalitySortedVersionSet::iterator V = bag.begin();
+++ /dev/null
-#!/bin/sh
-set -e
-
-TESTDIR=$(readlink -f $(dirname $0))
-. $TESTDIR/framework
-
-setupenvironment
-configarchitecture "i386"
-
-insertpackage 'unstable' 'foo' 'all' '1.0'
-insertinstalledpackage 'bar' 'i386' '1.0'
-
-insertinstalledpackage 'foobar' 'i386' '1.0'
-insertpackage 'unstable' 'foobar' 'i386' '2.0'
-
-setupaptarchive
-
-APTARCHIVE=$(readlink -f ./aptarchive)
-
-testequal "Listing...
-bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386
-foo/unstable 1.0 all
-foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list
-
-testequal "Listing...
-foo/unstable 1.0 all
-foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list "foo*"
-
-testequal "Listing...
-foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list --upgradable
-
-# FIXME: hm, hm - does it make sense to have this different? shouldn't
-# we use "installed,upgradable" consitently?
-testequal "Listing...
-bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386
-foobar/now 1.0 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0] i386" apt list --installed
-
-testequal "Listing...
-foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386
-foobar/now 1.0 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0] i386
-" apt list foobar --all-versions
-
-testequal "Listing...
-bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386
- an autogenerated dummy bar=1.0/installed
-" apt list bar --verbose
-
--- /dev/null
+#!/bin/sh
+set -e
+
+TESTDIR=$(readlink -f $(dirname $0))
+. $TESTDIR/framework
+
+setupenvironment
+configarchitecture "i386"
+
+insertpackage 'unstable' 'foo' 'all' '1.0'
+insertinstalledpackage 'bar' 'i386' '1.0'
+
+insertinstalledpackage 'foobar' 'i386' '1.0'
+insertpackage 'unstable' 'foobar' 'i386' '2.0'
+
+setupaptarchive
+
+APTARCHIVE=$(readlink -f ./aptarchive)
+
+testequal "Listing...
+bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386
+foo/unstable 1.0 all
+foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list
+
+testequal "Listing...
+foo/unstable 1.0 all
+foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list "foo*"
+
+testequal "Listing...
+foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list --upgradable
+
+# FIXME: hm, hm - does it make sense to have this different? shouldn't
+# we use "installed,upgradable" consitently?
+testequal "Listing...
+bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386
+foobar/now 1.0 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0] i386" apt list --installed
+
+testequal "Listing...
+foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386
+foobar/now 1.0 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0] i386
+" apt list foobar --all-versions
+
+testequal "Listing...
+bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386
+ an autogenerated dummy bar=1.0/installed
+" apt list bar --verbose
+
--- /dev/null
+#!/bin/sh
+set -e
+
+TESTDIR=$(readlink -f $(dirname $0))
+. $TESTDIR/framework
+
+setupenvironment
+configarchitecture "i386"
+
+DESCR='Some description that has a unusual word xxyyzz and aabbcc'
+DESCR2='Some other description with the unusual aabbcc only'
+insertpackage 'unstable' 'foo' 'all' '1.0' '' '' "$DESCR"
+insertpackage 'testing' 'bar' 'i386' '2.0' '' '' "$DESCR2"
+
+setupaptarchive
+
+APTARCHIVE=$(readlink -f ./aptarchive)
+
+# with OP progress
+testequal "Sorting...
+Full Text Search...
+foo/unstable 1.0 all
+ $DESCR
+" apt search xxyyzz
+
+# without op progress
+testequal "foo/unstable 1.0 all
+ $DESCR
+" apt search -qq xxyyzz
+
+# search with multiple words is a AND search
+testequal "foo/unstable 1.0 all
+ $DESCR
+" apt search -qq aabbcc xxyyzz
+
+# output is sorted and search word finds both package
+testequal "bar/testing 2.0 i386
+ $DESCR2
+
+foo/unstable 1.0 all
+ $DESCR
+" apt search -qq aabbcc
+
+
+