+// DepIterator::IsIgnorable - should this packag/providr be ignored? /*{{{*/
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
+/* Deps like self-conflicts should be ignored as well as implicit conflicts
+ on virtual packages. */
+bool pkgCache::DepIterator::IsIgnorable(PkgIterator const &/*Pkg*/) const
+{
+ if (IsNegative() == false)
+ return false;
+
+ pkgCache::PkgIterator PP = ParentPkg();
+ pkgCache::PkgIterator PT = TargetPkg();
+ if (PP->Group != PT->Group)
+ return false;
+ // self-conflict
+ if (PP == PT)
+ return true;
+ pkgCache::VerIterator PV = ParentVer();
+ // ignore group-conflict on a M-A:same package - but not our implicit dependencies
+ // so that we can have M-A:same packages conflicting with their own real name
+ if ((PV->MultiArch & pkgCache::Version::Same) == pkgCache::Version::Same)
+ {
+ // Replaces: ${self}:other ( << ${binary:Version})
+ if (S->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Replaces && S->CompareOp == pkgCache::Dep::Less && strcmp(PV.VerStr(), TargetVer()) == 0)
+ return false;
+ // Breaks: ${self}:other (!= ${binary:Version})
+ if (S->Type == pkgCache::Dep::DpkgBreaks && S->CompareOp == pkgCache::Dep::NotEquals && strcmp(PV.VerStr(), TargetVer()) == 0)
+ return false;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+bool pkgCache::DepIterator::IsIgnorable(PrvIterator const &Prv) const
+{
+ if (IsNegative() == false)
+ return false;
+
+ PkgIterator const Pkg = ParentPkg();
+ /* Provides may never be applied against the same package (or group)
+ if it is a conflicts. See the comment above. */
+ if (Prv.OwnerPkg()->Group == Pkg->Group)
+ return true;
+ // Implicit group-conflicts should not be applied on providers of other groups
+ if (Pkg->Group == TargetPkg()->Group && Prv.OwnerPkg()->Group != Pkg->Group)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+ /*}}}*/
+// DepIterator::IsMultiArchImplicit - added by the cache generation /*{{{*/
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
+/* MultiArch can be translated to SingleArch for an resolver and we did so,
+ by adding dependencies to help the resolver understand the problem, but
+ sometimes it is needed to identify these to ignore them… */
+bool pkgCache::DepIterator::IsMultiArchImplicit() const
+{
+ if (ParentPkg()->Arch != TargetPkg()->Arch &&
+ (S->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Replaces ||
+ S->Type == pkgCache::Dep::DpkgBreaks ||
+ S->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Conflicts))
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+ /*}}}*/
+// DepIterator::IsSatisfied - check if a version satisfied the dependency /*{{{*/
+bool pkgCache::DepIterator::IsSatisfied(VerIterator const &Ver) const
+{
+ return Owner->VS->CheckDep(Ver.VerStr(),S->CompareOp,TargetVer());
+}
+bool pkgCache::DepIterator::IsSatisfied(PrvIterator const &Prv) const
+{
+ return Owner->VS->CheckDep(Prv.ProvideVersion(),S->CompareOp,TargetVer());
+}
+ /*}}}*/
+// ostream operator to handle string representation of a dependecy /*{{{*/
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------
+/* */
+std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& out, pkgCache::DepIterator D)
+{
+ if (D.end() == true)
+ return out << "invalid dependency";
+
+ pkgCache::PkgIterator P = D.ParentPkg();
+ pkgCache::PkgIterator T = D.TargetPkg();
+
+ out << (P.end() ? "invalid pkg" : P.FullName(false)) << " " << D.DepType()
+ << " on ";
+ if (T.end() == true)
+ out << "invalid pkg";
+ else
+ out << T;
+
+ if (D->Version != 0)
+ out << " (" << D.CompType() << " " << D.TargetVer() << ")";
+
+ return out;
+}
+ /*}}}*/
projects / apt.git / blobdiff