APTARCHIVE=$(readlink -f ./aptarchive)
-testequal "Listing...
+testsuccessequal "Listing...
bar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,local]
baz/unstable 2.0 all [upgradable from: 0.1]
foo/unstable 1.0 all
foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0]" apt list
-testequal "Listing...
+testsuccessequal "Listing...
foo/unstable 1.0 all
foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0]" apt list "foo*"
-testequal "Listing...
+testsuccessequal "Listing...
baz/unstable 2.0 all [upgradable from: 0.1]
foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0]" apt list --upgradable
# FIXME: hm, hm - does it make sense to have this different? shouldn't
# we use "installed,upgradable" consitently?
-testequal "Listing...
+testsuccessequal "Listing...
bar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,local]
baz/now 0.1 all [installed,upgradable to: 2.0]
foobar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0]" apt list --installed
-testequal "Listing...
+testsuccessequal "Listing...
+bar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,local]
+
foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0]
foobar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0]
-" apt list foobar --all-versions
+" apt list bar foobar --all-versions
-testequal "Listing...
+testsuccessequal "Listing...
bar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,local]
an autogenerated dummy bar=1.0/installed
" apt list bar --verbose
+# test for dpkg ^rc state
+insertinstalledpackage 'conf-only' 'i386' '1.0' '' '' 'deinstall ok config-files'
+testsuccessequal "Listing...
+conf-only/now 1.0 i386 [residual-config]" apt list conf-only
+
# ensure that the users learns about multiple versions too
-testequal "Listing...
+testsuccessequal "Listing...
baz/unstable 2.0 all [upgradable from: 0.1]
N: There are 2 additional versions. Please use the '-a' switch to see them." apt list baz -o quiet=0
+# test format strings for machine parseable output
+testsuccessequal 'bar - 1.0 - 1.0
+baz - 0.1 - 2.0' apt list -qq bar baz -o APT::Cmd::use-format=true -o APT::Cmd::format="\${Package} - \${installed:Version} - \${candidate:Version}"