</citerefentry>"
>
+<!ENTITY glob "<citerefentry>
+ <refentrytitle><abbrev>glob</abbrev></refentrytitle>
+ <manvolnum>7</manvolnum>
+ </citerefentry>"
+>
+
<!-- Boiler plate docinfo section -->
<!ENTITY apt-email "
<address>
">
<!ENTITY apt-product "
- <productname>Linux</productname>
+ <productname>APT</productname>
+ <releaseinfo role='version'>&apt-product-version;</releaseinfo>
">
+<!-- this will be updated by 'prepare-release' -->
+<!ENTITY apt-product-version "0.9.7">
+
<!-- Codenames for debian releases -->
<!ENTITY oldstable-codename "lenny">
<!ENTITY stable-codename "squeeze">
<!ENTITY testing-codename "wheezy">
-
+<!ENTITY stable-version "6.0">
+<!ENTITY ubuntu-codename "precise">
+
+<!-- good and bad just refers to matching and not matching a pattern…
+ It is not a remark about the specific perl version.
+ There is no way perl could be clasified "good" (or "bad") in any version… -->
+<!ENTITY good-perl "5.10">
+<!ENTITY bad-perl "5.14">
<!-- Arguments -->
<!ENTITY synopsis-arg-option "<arg><option>-o=<replaceable>&synopsis-config-string;</replaceable></option></arg>">