/* Set the current state of everything. In this state all of the
packages are kept exactly as is. See AllUpgrade */
int Done = 0;
- for (PkgIterator I = PkgBegin(); I.end() != true; I++,Done++)
+ for (PkgIterator I = PkgBegin(); I.end() != true; ++I, ++Done)
{
if (Prog != 0 && Done%20 == 0)
Prog->Progress(Done);
// then write the ones we have not seen yet
std::ostringstream ostr;
- for(pkgCache::PkgIterator pkg=Cache->PkgBegin(); !pkg.end(); pkg++) {
+ for(pkgCache::PkgIterator pkg=Cache->PkgBegin(); !pkg.end(); ++pkg) {
StateCache const &P = PkgState[pkg->ID];
if(P.Flags & Flag::Auto) {
if (pkgs_seen.find(pkg.FullName()) != pkgs_seen.end()) {
/* Check simple depends. A depends -should- never self match but
we allow it anyhow because dpkg does. Technically it is a packaging
bug. Conflicts may never self match */
- if (Dep.TargetPkg() != Dep.ParentPkg() ||
- (Dep->Type != Dep::Conflicts && Dep->Type != Dep::DpkgBreaks && Dep->Type != Dep::Obsoletes))
+ if (Dep.TargetPkg() != Dep.ParentPkg() || Dep.IsNegative() == false)
{
PkgIterator Pkg = Dep.TargetPkg();
// Check the base package
// Check the providing packages
PrvIterator P = Dep.TargetPkg().ProvidesList();
PkgIterator Pkg = Dep.ParentPkg();
- for (; P.end() != true; P++)
+ for (; P.end() != true; ++P)
{
/* Provides may never be applied against the same package (or group)
if it is a conflicts. See the comment above. */
- if (P.OwnerPkg()->Group == Pkg->Group &&
- (Dep->Type == Dep::Conflicts || Dep->Type == Dep::DpkgBreaks))
+ if (P.OwnerPkg()->Group == Pkg->Group && Dep.IsNegative() == true)
continue;
// Check if the provides is a hit
// Not installed
if (Pkg->CurrentVer == 0)
{
- if (State.Mode == ModeDelete &&
+ if (State.Mode == ModeDelete &&
(State.iFlags & Purge) == Purge && Pkg.Purge() == false)
iDelCount += Add;
{
unsigned char Group = 0;
- for (DepIterator D = V.DependsList(); D.end() != true; D++)
+ for (DepIterator D = V.DependsList(); D.end() != true; ++D)
{
// Build the dependency state.
unsigned char &State = DepState[D->ID];
/* Invert for Conflicts. We have to do this twice to get the
right sense for a conflicts group */
- if (D->Type == Dep::Conflicts ||
- D->Type == Dep::DpkgBreaks ||
- D->Type == Dep::Obsoletes)
+ if (D.IsNegative() == true)
State = ~State;
// Add to the group if we are within an or..
Group = 0;
// Invert for Conflicts
- if (D->Type == Dep::Conflicts ||
- D->Type == Dep::DpkgBreaks ||
- D->Type == Dep::Obsoletes)
+ if (D.IsNegative() == true)
State = ~State;
}
}
// Compute a single dependency element (glob or)
DepIterator Start = D;
unsigned char State = 0;
- for (bool LastOR = true; D.end() == false && LastOR == true; D++)
+ for (bool LastOR = true; D.end() == false && LastOR == true; ++D)
{
State |= DepState[D->ID];
LastOR = (D->CompareOp & Dep::Or) == Dep::Or;
// Perform the depends pass
int Done = 0;
- for (PkgIterator I = PkgBegin(); I.end() != true; I++,Done++)
+ for (PkgIterator I = PkgBegin(); I.end() != true; ++I, ++Done)
{
if (Prog != 0 && Done%20 == 0)
Prog->Progress(Done);
- for (VerIterator V = I.VersionList(); V.end() != true; V++)
+ for (VerIterator V = I.VersionList(); V.end() != true; ++V)
{
unsigned char Group = 0;
- for (DepIterator D = V.DependsList(); D.end() != true; D++)
+ for (DepIterator D = V.DependsList(); D.end() != true; ++D)
{
// Build the dependency state.
unsigned char &State = DepState[D->ID];
Group = 0;
// Invert for Conflicts
- if (D->Type == Dep::Conflicts ||
- D->Type == Dep::DpkgBreaks ||
- D->Type == Dep::Obsoletes)
+ if (D.IsNegative() == true)
State = ~State;
}
}
void pkgDepCache::Update(DepIterator D)
{
// Update the reverse deps
- for (;D.end() != true; D++)
+ for (;D.end() != true; ++D)
{
unsigned char &State = DepState[D->ID];
State = DependencyState(D);
// Invert for Conflicts
- if (D->Type == Dep::Conflicts ||
- D->Type == Dep::DpkgBreaks ||
- D->Type == Dep::Obsoletes)
+ if (D.IsNegative() == true)
State = ~State;
RemoveStates(D.ParentPkg());
// Update the provides map for the current ver
if (Pkg->CurrentVer != 0)
for (PrvIterator P = Pkg.CurrentVer().ProvidesList();
- P.end() != true; P++)
+ P.end() != true; ++P)
Update(P.ParentPkg().RevDependsList());
// Update the provides map for the candidate ver
if (PkgState[Pkg->ID].CandidateVer != 0)
for (PrvIterator P = PkgState[Pkg->ID].CandidateVerIter(*this).ProvidesList();
- P.end() != true; P++)
+ P.end() != true; ++P)
Update(P.ParentPkg().RevDependsList());
}
/*}}}*/
DepIterator Start = Dep;
bool Result = true;
unsigned Ors = 0;
- for (bool LastOR = true; Dep.end() == false && LastOR == true; Dep++,Ors++)
+ for (bool LastOR = true; Dep.end() == false && LastOR == true; ++Dep, ++Ors)
{
LastOR = (Dep->CompareOp & Dep::Or) == Dep::Or;
*/
if (IsImportantDep(Start) == false)
continue;
-
+
+ /* If we are in an or group locate the first or that can
+ succeed. We have already cached this.. */
+ for (; Ors > 1 && (DepState[Start->ID] & DepCVer) != DepCVer; --Ors)
+ ++Start;
+ if (Ors == 1 && (DepState[Start->ID] &DepCVer) != DepCVer && Start.IsNegative() == false)
+ {
+ if(DebugAutoInstall == true)
+ std::clog << OutputInDepth(Depth) << Start << " can't be satisfied!" << std::endl;
+ if (Start.IsCritical() == false)
+ continue;
+ // if the dependency was critical, we can't install it, so remove it again
+ MarkDelete(Pkg,false,Depth + 1, false);
+ return;
+ }
+
/* Check if any ImportantDep() (but not Critical) were added
* since we installed the package. Also check for deps that
* were satisfied in the past: for instance, if a version
* package should follow that Recommends rather than causing the
* dependency to be removed. (bug #470115)
*/
- bool isNewImportantDep = false;
- bool isPreviouslySatisfiedImportantDep = false;
- if(!ForceImportantDeps && !Start.IsCritical())
+ if (Pkg->CurrentVer != 0 && ForceImportantDeps == false && Start.IsCritical() == false)
{
- bool found=false;
- VerIterator instVer = Pkg.CurrentVer();
- if(!instVer.end())
+ bool isNewImportantDep = true;
+ bool isPreviouslySatisfiedImportantDep = false;
+ for (DepIterator D = Pkg.CurrentVer().DependsList(); D.end() != true; ++D)
+ {
+ //FIXME: Should we handle or-group better here?
+ // We do not check if the package we look for is part of the same or-group
+ // we might find while searching, but could that really be a problem?
+ if (D.IsCritical() == true || IsImportantDep(D) == false ||
+ Start.TargetPkg() != D.TargetPkg())
+ continue;
+
+ isNewImportantDep = false;
+
+ while ((D->CompareOp & Dep::Or) != 0)
+ ++D;
+
+ isPreviouslySatisfiedImportantDep = (((*this)[D] & DepGNow) != 0);
+ if (isPreviouslySatisfiedImportantDep == true)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if(isNewImportantDep == true)
+ {
+ if (DebugAutoInstall == true)
+ std::clog << OutputInDepth(Depth) << "new important dependency: "
+ << Start.TargetPkg().FullName() << std::endl;
+ }
+ else if(isPreviouslySatisfiedImportantDep == true)
+ {
+ if (DebugAutoInstall == true)
+ std::clog << OutputInDepth(Depth) << "previously satisfied important dependency on "
+ << Start.TargetPkg().FullName() << std::endl;
+ }
+ else
{
- for (DepIterator D = instVer.DependsList(); D.end() != true; D++)
- {
- //FIXME: deal better with or-groups(?)
- if(IsImportantDep(D) && !D.IsCritical() &&
- Start.TargetPkg() == D.TargetPkg())
- {
- if(!isPreviouslySatisfiedImportantDep)
- {
- DepIterator D2 = D;
- while((D2->CompareOp & Dep::Or) != 0)
- ++D2;
-
- isPreviouslySatisfiedImportantDep =
- (((*this)[D2] & DepGNow) != 0);
- }
-
- found=true;
- }
- }
- // this is a new dep if it was not found to be already
- // a important dep of the installed pacakge
- isNewImportantDep = !found;
+ if (DebugAutoInstall == true)
+ std::clog << OutputInDepth(Depth) << "ignore old unsatisfied important dependency on "
+ << Start.TargetPkg().FullName() << std::endl;
+ continue;
}
}
- if(isNewImportantDep)
- if(DebugAutoInstall == true)
- std::clog << OutputInDepth(Depth) << "new important dependency: "
- << Start.TargetPkg().Name() << std::endl;
- if(isPreviouslySatisfiedImportantDep)
- if(DebugAutoInstall == true)
- std::clog << OutputInDepth(Depth) << "previously satisfied important dependency on "
- << Start.TargetPkg().Name() << std::endl;
-
- // skip important deps if the package is already installed
- if (Pkg->CurrentVer != 0 && Start.IsCritical() == false
- && !isNewImportantDep && !isPreviouslySatisfiedImportantDep
- && !ForceImportantDeps)
- continue;
-
- /* If we are in an or group locate the first or that can
- succeed. We have already cached this.. */
- for (; Ors > 1 && (DepState[Start->ID] & DepCVer) != DepCVer; Ors--)
- Start++;
/* This bit is for processing the possibilty of an install/upgrade
fixing the problem */
/* For conflicts we just de-install the package and mark as auto,
Conflicts may not have or groups. For dpkg's Breaks we try to
upgrade the package. */
- if (Start->Type == Dep::Conflicts || Start->Type == Dep::Obsoletes ||
- Start->Type == Dep::DpkgBreaks)
+ if (Start.IsNegative() == true)
{
for (Version **I = List; *I != 0; I++)
{
unless they are already installed */
VerIterator Last(*(pkgCache *)this,0);
- for (VerIterator I = Pkg.VersionList(); I.end() == false; I++)
+ for (VerIterator I = Pkg.VersionList(); I.end() == false; ++I)
{
if (Pkg.CurrentVer() == I)
return I;
- for (VerFileIterator J = I.FileList(); J.end() == false; J++)
+ for (VerFileIterator J = I.FileList(); J.end() == false; ++J)
{
if ((J.File()->Flags & Flag::NotSource) != 0)
continue;
bool pkgDepCache::MarkFollowsSuggests()
{
- return _config->FindB("APT::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant", false);
+ return _config->FindB("APT::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant", true);
}
// pkgDepCache::MarkRequired - the main mark algorithm /*{{{*/
projects / apt.git / blobdiff