we allow it anyhow because dpkg does. Technically it is a packaging
bug. Conflicts may never self match */
if (Dep.TargetPkg() != Dep.ParentPkg() ||
- (Dep->Type != Dep::Conflicts && Dep->Type != Dep::Obsoletes))
+ (Dep->Type != Dep::Conflicts && Dep->Type != Dep::DpkgBreaks && Dep->Type != Dep::Obsoletes))
{
PkgIterator Pkg = Dep.TargetPkg();
// Check the base package
{
/* Provides may never be applied against the same package if it is
a conflicts. See the comment above. */
- if (P.OwnerPkg() == Pkg && Dep->Type == Dep::Conflicts)
+ if (P.OwnerPkg() == Pkg &&
+ (Dep->Type == Dep::Conflicts || Dep->Type == Dep::DpkgBreaks))
continue;
// Check if the provides is a hit
/* Invert for Conflicts. We have to do this twice to get the
right sense for a conflicts group */
- if (D->Type == Dep::Conflicts || D->Type == Dep::Obsoletes)
+ if (D->Type == Dep::Conflicts ||
+ D->Type == Dep::DpkgBreaks ||
+ D->Type == Dep::Obsoletes)
State = ~State;
// Add to the group if we are within an or..
Group = 0;
// Invert for Conflicts
- if (D->Type == Dep::Conflicts || D->Type == Dep::Obsoletes)
+ if (D->Type == Dep::Conflicts ||
+ D->Type == Dep::DpkgBreaks ||
+ D->Type == Dep::Obsoletes)
State = ~State;
}
}
Group = 0;
// Invert for Conflicts
- if (D->Type == Dep::Conflicts || D->Type == Dep::Obsoletes)
+ if (D->Type == Dep::Conflicts ||
+ D->Type == Dep::DpkgBreaks ||
+ D->Type == Dep::Obsoletes)
State = ~State;
}
}
State = DependencyState(D);
// Invert for Conflicts
- if (D->Type == Dep::Conflicts || D->Type == Dep::Obsoletes)
+ if (D->Type == Dep::Conflicts ||
+ D->Type == Dep::DpkgBreaks ||
+ D->Type == Dep::Obsoletes)
State = ~State;
RemoveStates(D.ParentPkg());
bool found=false;
VerIterator instVer = Pkg.CurrentVer();
if(!instVer.end())
+ {
for (DepIterator D = instVer.DependsList(); D.end() != true; D++)
{
//FIXME: deal better with or-groups(?)
if(IsImportantDep(D) && Start.TargetPkg() == D.TargetPkg())
found=true;
}
- // this is a new dep if it was not found to be already
- // a important dep of the installed pacakge
- isNewImportantDep = !found;
+ // this is a new dep if it was not found to be already
+ // a important dep of the installed pacakge
+ isNewImportantDep = !found;
+ }
}
if(isNewImportantDep)
if(_config->FindB("Debug::pkgDepCache::AutoInstall",false) == true)
/* This bit is for processing the possibilty of an install/upgrade
fixing the problem */
SPtrArray<Version *> List = Start.AllTargets();
- if ((DepState[Start->ID] & DepCVer) == DepCVer)
+ if (Start->Type != Dep::DpkgBreaks &&
+ (DepState[Start->ID] & DepCVer) == DepCVer)
{
// Right, find the best version to install..
Version **Cur = List;
}
continue;
}
-
+
/* For conflicts we just de-install the package and mark as auto,
- Conflicts may not have or groups */
- if (Start->Type == Dep::Conflicts || Start->Type == Dep::Obsoletes)
+ Conflicts may not have or groups. For dpkg's Breaks we try to
+ upgrade the package. */
+ if (Start->Type == Dep::Conflicts || Start->Type == Dep::Obsoletes ||
+ Start->Type == Dep::DpkgBreaks)
{
for (Version **I = List; *I != 0; I++)
{
VerIterator Ver(*this,*I);
PkgIterator Pkg = Ver.ParentPkg();
-
- MarkDelete(Pkg);
+
+ if (Start->Type != Dep::DpkgBreaks)
+ MarkDelete(Pkg);
+ else
+ if (PkgState[Pkg->ID].CandidateVer != *I)
+ MarkInstall(Pkg,true,Depth + 1, false, ForceImportantDeps);
}
continue;
}
{
if(Dep.IsCritical())
return true;
- else if(Dep->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Recommends)
- return _config->FindB("APT::Install-Recommends", false);
+ else if(Dep->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Recommends)
+ {
+ if ( _config->FindB("APT::Install-Recommends", false))
+ return true;
+ // we suport a special mode to only install-recommends for certain
+ // sections
+ // FIXME: this is a meant as a temporarly solution until the
+ // recommends are cleaned up
+ string s = _config->Find("APT::Install-Recommends-Section","");
+ if(s.size() > 0)
+ {
+ const char *sec = Dep.ParentVer().Section();
+ if (sec && strcmp(sec, s.c_str()) == 0)
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
else if(Dep->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Suggests)
return _config->FindB("APT::Install-Suggests", false);