]> git.saurik.com Git - apt.git/blobdiff - test/integration/test-apt-cli-list
Fix multiarch package upgrade issue
[apt.git] / test / integration / test-apt-cli-list
index 8d5df90510d7b11801f3dbdda0701e66c5779c87..47507aeb8d065e506c21dc8a4fb21bbd82aff668 100755 (executable)
@@ -18,30 +18,30 @@ setupaptarchive
 APTARCHIVE=$(readlink -f ./aptarchive)
 
 testequal "Listing...
-bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386
+bar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,local]
 foo/unstable 1.0 all
-foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list
+foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0]" apt list
 
 testequal "Listing...
 foo/unstable 1.0 all
-foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list "foo*"
+foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0]" apt list "foo*"
 
 testequal "Listing...
-foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list --upgradable
+foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0]" apt list --upgradable
 
 # FIXME: hm, hm - does it make sense to have this different? shouldn't
 #        we use "installed,upgradable" consitently?
 testequal "Listing...
-bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386
-foobar/now 1.0 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0] i386" apt list --installed
+bar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,local]
+foobar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0]" apt list --installed
 
 testequal "Listing...
-foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386
-foobar/now 1.0 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0] i386
+foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0]
+foobar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0]
 " apt list foobar --all-versions
 
 testequal "Listing...
-bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386
+bar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,local]
   an autogenerated dummy bar=1.0/installed
 " apt list bar --verbose