]> git.saurik.com Git - apt.git/blame - README.MultiArch
* apt-pkg/indexcopy.cc:
[apt.git] / README.MultiArch
CommitLineData
9a230738
DK
1Before we start with this topic: Note that MultiArch is not yet ready for
2prime time and/or for the casual user. The implementation is so far widely
3untested and only useful for developers of packagemanagment tools which
4use APT and his friends and maintainers of (upcoming) MultiArch packages.
5This README is especially NOT written for the casual user and is NOT a
6usage guide - you have been warned. It is assumed that the reader has
7at least a bit of knowledge about APT internals, dependency relations
8and the MultiArch spec [0].
9
f1a5db64
DK
10Note also that the toolchain isn't ready yet, e.g. while you can simulate
11the installation of MultiArch packages they will more sooner than later
12cause enormous problems if really installed as dpkg can't handle MultiArch
13yet (no, --force-{overwrite,architecture} aren't good options here).
14Other parts of the big picture are missing and/or untested too.
15You have been warned!
16
9a230738
DK
17
18The implementation is focused on NOT breaking existing singleArch-only
19applications and/or systems as this is the current status-quo for all
20systems. Also, many systems don't need (or can't make use of) MultiArch,
21so APT will proceed in thinking SingleArch as long as it is not explicitly
22told to handle MultiArch:
23To activate MultiArch handling you need to specify architectures you
24want to be considered by APT with the config list APT::Architectures
25(Insert architectures in order of preference).
26APT will download Packages files for all these architectures in the
27update step. Exception: In the sourcelist is the optionfield used:
28deb [ arch=amd64,i386 ] http://example.org/ experimental main
29(This optionfield is a NOP in previous apt versions)
30
31Internally in APT a package is represented as a PkgIterator -
32before MultiArch this PkgIterator was architecture unaware,
33only VerIterators include the architecture they came from.
34This is/was a big problem as all versions in a package are
35considered for dependency resolution, so pinning will not work in all cases.
36
37The problem is solved by a conceptional change:
38A PkgIterator is now architecture aware, so the packages
39of foobar for amd64 and for i386 are now for apt internal totally
40different packages. That is a good thing for e.g. pinning, but
41sometimes you need the information that such packages are belonging together:
42All these foobar packages therefore form a Group accessible with GrpIterators.
43Note that the GrpIterator has the same name as all the packages in this group,
44so e.g. apt-cache pkgnames iterates over GrpIterator to get the package names:
45This is compatible to SingleArch as a Group consists only of a single package
46and also to MultiArch as a Group consists of possible many packages which
47all have the same name and are therefore out of interest for pkgnames.
48
49
50Caused by the paragraph "Dependencies involving Architecture: all packages"
51in the MultiArch spec we have a second major conceptional change
52which could even break existing applications, but we hope for the best…
53An Architecture: all package is internally split into pseudo packages
54for all MultiArch Architectures and additional a package with the
55architecture "all" with no dependencies which is a dependency of all
56these architecture depending packages. While the architecture depending
57packages are mainly used for dependency resolution (a package of arch A which
58depends on an arch all package assumes that the dependencies of this package
59are also from arch A. Packages also sometimes change from any to all or v.v.)
60the arch "all" package is used for scheduling download/installation of the
61underlying "real" package. Note that the architecture depending packages can
62be detected with Pseudo() while the "all" package reports exactly this arch
63as package architecture and as pseudo architecture of the versions of this pkg.
64Beware: All versions of a "real" architecture all package will be report "all"
65as their architecture if asked with Arch() regardless if they are the "all" or
66the architecture depending packages. If you want to know the architecture this
67pseudo package was created for call Arch(true). Also, while the spec say that
68arch:all packages are not allowed to have a MultiArch flag APT assigns a
69special value to them: MultiArch: all.
70
71
72As you might guess this arch:all handling has a few problems (but we think so
73far that the problems are minor compared to the problems we would have with
74other implementations.)
75APT doesn't know which pseudo packages of such an arch all package are
76"installed" (to satisfy dependencies), so APT will generate a Cache in which
77all these pseudo packages are installed (e.g. apt-cache policy will display
78them all as installed). Later in the DepCache step it will "remove"
79all pseudo packages whose dependencies are not satisfied.
80The expense is that if the package state is broken APT could come to the
81conclusion to "remove" too many pseudo packages, but in a stable environment
82APT should never end up in a broken system state…
83
84
85Given all these internal changes it is quite interesting that the actual
86implementation of MultiArch is trivial: Some implicit dependencies and a few
87more provides are all changes needed to get it working. Especially noteworthy
88is that it wasn't needed to change the resolver in any way and other parts only
89need to be told about ignoring pseudo packages or using GrpIterator instead of
90PkgIterator, so chances are good that libapt-applications will proceed to work
91without or at least only require minor changes, but your mileage may vary…
92
93
94Known Issues and/or noteworthy stuff:
95* The implementation is mostly untested, so it is very likely that APT will
96 eat your kids if you aren't as lucky as the author of these patches.
97* the (install)size of a pseudo package is always NULL - if you want to know
98 the (install)size you need to get the info from the arch "all" package.
99* It is maybe confusing, but the arch "all" package does have the same versions
100 and in general roughly the same information with one subtil difference:
101 It doesn't have any dependency, regardless of the type. The pseudo packages
102 depend on this package.
103* apt-cache policy foobar on installed architecture all package foobar will
104 report all architecture depending packages as installed. Displaying here the
105 correct information would require to build the complete DepCache…
106* [BUG] An installed package which changes the architecture from any to all
107 (and v.v.) shows up in the NEW packages section instead of UPGRADE.
108* [TODO] Investigate the DepCache pseudo-package killer heuristic:
109 e.g. add more safety guards…
110* [FIXME] a few corner cases/missing features marked as FIXME in the code
111
112
113[0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec