Fixed wxToolBar for WinCE so normal bitmaps can be used;

[wxWidgets.git] / docs / latex / wx / tstring.tex

diff --git a/docs/latex/wx/tstring.tex b/docs/latex/wx/tstring.tex
index 7449e617e271bf8bd88f1423ef558cb5e2624853..17acb3070c7cfb71c1dde53268ce897be8ab060a 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/latex/wx/tstring.tex
+++ b/docs/latex/wx/tstring.tex
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Classes: \helpref{wxString}{wxstring}, \helpref{wxArrayString}{wxarraystring}, \helpref{wxStringTokenizer}{wxstringtokenizer}
 
 
 Classes: \helpref{wxString}{wxstring}, \helpref{wxArrayString}{wxarraystring}, \helpref{wxStringTokenizer}{wxstringtokenizer}
 

-\subsection{Introduction}
+\subsection{Introduction}\label{introductiontowxstring}

 
 wxString is a class which represents a character string of arbitrary length (limited by 
 {\it MAX\_INT} which is usually 2147483647 on 32 bit machines) and containing
 
 wxString is a class which represents a character string of arbitrary length (limited by 
 {\it MAX\_INT} which is usually 2147483647 on 32 bit machines) and containing


@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ replacing and both C-like \helpref{Printf()}{wxstringprintf} and stream-like
 insertion functions as well as much more - see \helpref{wxString}{wxstring} 
 for a list of all functions.
 
 insertion functions as well as much more - see \helpref{wxString}{wxstring} 
 for a list of all functions.
 

-\subsection{Comparison of wxString to other string classes}
+\subsection{Comparison of wxString to other string classes}\label{otherstringclasses}

 
 The advantages of using a special string class instead of working directly with
 C strings are so obvious that there is a huge number of such classes available.
 
 The advantages of using a special string class instead of working directly with
 C strings are so obvious that there is a huge number of such classes available.


@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ It also provides performance \helpref{statistics gathering code}{wxstringtuning}
 which may be enabled to fine tune the memory allocation strategy for your
 particular application - and the gain might be quite big.
 \item {\bf Compatibility} This class tries to combine almost full compatibility
 which may be enabled to fine tune the memory allocation strategy for your
 particular application - and the gain might be quite big.
 \item {\bf Compatibility} This class tries to combine almost full compatibility

-with the old wxWindows 1.xx wxString class, some reminiscence to MFC CString
+with the old wxWidgets 1.xx wxString class, some reminiscence to MFC CString

 class and 90\% of the functionality of std::string class.
 \item {\bf Rich set of functions} Some of the functions present in wxString are
 very useful but don't exist in most of other string classes: for example, 
 class and 90\% of the functionality of std::string class.
 \item {\bf Rich set of functions} Some of the functions present in wxString are
 very useful but don't exist in most of other string classes: for example, 


@@ -53,10 +53,10 @@ operations are supported as well.
 to and from ANSI and Unicode strings in any build mode (see the 
 \helpref{Unicode overview}{unicode} for more details) and maps to either
 {\tt string} or {\tt wstring} transparently depending on the current mode.
 to and from ANSI and Unicode strings in any build mode (see the 
 \helpref{Unicode overview}{unicode} for more details) and maps to either
 {\tt string} or {\tt wstring} transparently depending on the current mode.

-\item {\bf Used by wxWindows} And, of course, this class is used everywhere
-inside wxWindows so there is no performance loss which would result from
+\item {\bf Used by wxWidgets} And, of course, this class is used everywhere
+inside wxWidgets so there is no performance loss which would result from

 conversions of objects of any other string class (including std::string) to
 conversions of objects of any other string class (including std::string) to

-wxString internally by wxWindows.
+wxString internally by wxWidgets.

 \end{enumerate}
 
 However, there are several problems as well. The most important one is probably
 \end{enumerate}
 
 However, there are several problems as well. The most important one is probably


@@ -65,18 +65,18 @@ example, to get the length of the string either one of
 length(), \helpref{Len()}{wxstringlen} or 
 \helpref{Length()}{wxstringlength} may be used. The first function, as almost
 all the other functions in lowercase, is std::string compatible. The second one
 length(), \helpref{Len()}{wxstringlen} or 
 \helpref{Length()}{wxstringlength} may be used. The first function, as almost
 all the other functions in lowercase, is std::string compatible. The second one

-is "native" wxString version and the last one is wxWindows 1.xx way. So the
+is "native" wxString version and the last one is wxWidgets 1.xx way. So the

 question is: which one is better to use? And the answer is that:
 
 {\bf The usage of std::string compatible functions is strongly advised!} It will
 both make your code more familiar to other C++ programmers (who are supposed to
 have knowledge of std::string but not of wxString), let you reuse the same code
 question is: which one is better to use? And the answer is that:
 
 {\bf The usage of std::string compatible functions is strongly advised!} It will
 both make your code more familiar to other C++ programmers (who are supposed to
 have knowledge of std::string but not of wxString), let you reuse the same code

-in both wxWindows and other programs (by just typedefing wxString as std::string
-when used outside wxWindows) and by staying compatible with future versions of
-wxWindows which will probably start using std::string sooner or later too.
+in both wxWidgets and other programs (by just typedefing wxString as std::string
+when used outside wxWidgets) and by staying compatible with future versions of
+wxWidgets which will probably start using std::string sooner or later too.

 
 In the situations where there is no corresponding std::string function, please
 
 In the situations where there is no corresponding std::string function, please

-try to use the new wxString methods and not the old wxWindows 1.xx variants
+try to use the new wxString methods and not the old wxWidgets 1.xx variants

 which are deprecated and may disappear in future versions.
 
 \subsection{Some advice about using wxString}\label{wxstringadvices}
 which are deprecated and may disappear in future versions.
 
 \subsection{Some advice about using wxString}\label{wxstringadvices}


@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ strings inside the function faster because of
 strings should return {\it wxString} - this makes it safe to return local
 variables.
 
 strings should return {\it wxString} - this makes it safe to return local
 variables.
 

-\subsection{Other string related functions and classes}
+\subsection{Other string related functions and classes}\label{relatedtostring}

 
 As most programs use character strings, the standard C library provides quite
 a few functions to work with them. Unfortunately, some of them have rather
 
 As most programs use character strings, the standard C library provides quite
 a few functions to work with them. Unfortunately, some of them have rather