test wxExecute() in the sample

[wxWidgets.git] / src / mac / carbon / dc.cpp

diff --git a/src/mac/carbon/dc.cpp b/src/mac/carbon/dc.cpp
index 2828b715c6f727d6f61d49424785862c2e5a9d60..5778b90b072740d901e9e6591795d84405ec4b8d 100644 (file)
--- a/src/mac/carbon/dc.cpp
+++ b/src/mac/carbon/dc.cpp
@@ -649,39 +649,15 @@ void  wxDC::SetLogicalFunction( int function )
        m_macPenInstalled = false ;
 }
 
-void  wxDC::DoFloodFill( wxCoord x, wxCoord y, const wxColour& col,
-                             int style )
+extern void wxDoFloodFill(wxDC *dc, wxCoord x, wxCoord y, 
+                          const wxColour & col, int style);
+
+void wxDC::DoFloodFill(wxCoord x, wxCoord y,
+                       const wxColour& col, int style)
 {
+    wxDoFloodFill(this, x, y, col, style);
 }
 
-    if (GetBrush().GetStyle() == wxTRANSPARENT)
-    {
-        wxLogDebug(wxT("In FloodFill, Current Brush is transparent, no filling done"));
-        return ;
-    }
-    int height = 0;
-    int width  = 0;
-    this->GetSize(&width, &height);
-    //it would be nice to fail if we don't get a sensible size...
-    if (width < 1 || height < 1)
-    {
-        wxLogError(wxT("In FloodFill, dc.GetSize routine failed, method not supported by this DC"));
-        return ;
-    }
-
-    //this is much faster than doing the individual pixels
-    wxMemoryDC memdc;
-    wxBitmap bitmap(width, height);
-    memdc.SelectObject(bitmap);
-    memdc.Blit(0, 0, width, height, (wxDC*) this, 0, 0);
-    memdc.SelectObject(wxNullBitmap);
-
-    wxImage image(bitmap);
-    image.DoFloodFill (x,y, GetBrush(), col, style, GetLogicalFunction());
-    bitmap = wxBitmap(image);
-    memdc.SelectObject(bitmap);
-    this->Blit(0, 0, width, height, &memdc, 0, 0);
-    memdc.SelectObject(wxNullBitmap);
 bool  wxDC::DoGetPixel( wxCoord x, wxCoord y, wxColour *col ) const 
 {
     wxCHECK_MSG( Ok(), false, wxT("wxDC::DoGetPixel  Invalid DC") );