/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-// Name: validate.cpp
+// Name: src/common/validate.cpp
// Purpose: wxValidator
// Author: Julian Smart
// Modified by:
// Created: 04/01/98
// RCS-ID: $Id$
-// Copyright: (c) Julian Smart and Markus Holzem
-// Licence: wxWindows license
+// Copyright: (c) Julian Smart
+// Licence: wxWindows licence
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-#ifdef __GNUG__
-#pragma implementation "validate.h"
-#endif
-
// For compilers that support precompilation, includes "wx.h".
#include "wx/wxprec.h"
#ifdef __BORLANDC__
- #pragma hdrstop
-#endif
-
-#ifndef WX_PRECOMP
- #include "wx/defs.h"
+ #pragma hdrstop
#endif
#if wxUSE_VALIDATORS
+#include "wx/validate.h"
+
#ifndef WX_PRECOMP
- #include "wx/window.h"
+ #include "wx/window.h"
#endif
-#include "wx/validate.h"
-
-#if defined(__VISAGECPP__)
-// treated as a static global class by VA and thus cannot use in this form.
-// Defined as a pointer and then explicity allocated and deallocated
-// by user if desired
-const wxValidator* wxDefaultValidator;
-#else
const wxValidator wxDefaultValidator;
-#endif
-#if !USE_SHARED_LIBRARY
- IMPLEMENT_DYNAMIC_CLASS(wxValidator, wxEvtHandler)
-#endif
+IMPLEMENT_DYNAMIC_CLASS(wxValidator, wxEvtHandler)
-// VZ: personally, I think TRUE would be more appropriate - these bells are
+// VZ: personally, I think true would be more appropriate - these bells are
// _annoying_
-bool wxValidator::ms_isSilent = FALSE;
+bool wxValidator::ms_isSilent = false;
wxValidator::wxValidator()
{
- m_validatorWindow = (wxWindow *) NULL;
+ m_validatorWindow = NULL;
}
wxValidator::~wxValidator()