add virtual DoGetTextExtent() to allow calling the overloaded wxWindowBase::GetTextEx...

[wxWidgets.git] / src / cocoa / app.mm

diff --git a/src/cocoa/app.mm b/src/cocoa/app.mm
index 00ca9fb6dc30b231144a61107530db13d6564b78..0f30885ea95c41c64bc6a9134741fc72b9a32dbe 100644 (file)
--- a/src/cocoa/app.mm
+++ b/src/cocoa/app.mm
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
 #include "wx/app.h"
 
 #ifndef WX_PRECOMP
 #include "wx/app.h"
 
 #ifndef WX_PRECOMP

-    #include "wx/dc.h"

     #include "wx/intl.h"
     #include "wx/log.h"
     #include "wx/module.h"
     #include "wx/intl.h"
     #include "wx/log.h"
     #include "wx/module.h"


@@ -26,6 +25,8 @@
 #include "wx/cocoa/mbarman.h"
 #include "wx/cocoa/NSApplication.h"
 
 #include "wx/cocoa/mbarman.h"
 #include "wx/cocoa/NSApplication.h"
 

+#include "wx/cocoa/dc.h"
+

 #import <AppKit/NSApplication.h>
 #import <Foundation/NSRunLoop.h>
 #import <Foundation/NSThread.h>
 #import <AppKit/NSApplication.h>
 #import <Foundation/NSRunLoop.h>
 #import <Foundation/NSThread.h>


@@ -34,8 +35,10 @@
 #import <Foundation/NSNotification.h>
 #import <AppKit/NSCell.h>
 
 #import <Foundation/NSNotification.h>
 #import <AppKit/NSCell.h>
 

+bool      wxApp::sm_isEmbedded = false; // Normally we're not a plugin
+

 // wxNSApplicationObserver singleton.
 // wxNSApplicationObserver singleton.

-static wxObjcAutoRefFromAlloc<wxNSApplicationObserver*> sg_cocoaAppObserver = [[wxNSApplicationObserver alloc] init];
+static wxObjcAutoRefFromAlloc<wxNSApplicationObserver*> sg_cocoaAppObserver = [[WX_GET_OBJC_CLASS(wxNSApplicationObserver) alloc] init];

 
 // ========================================================================
 // wxNSApplicationDelegate
 
 // ========================================================================
 // wxNSApplicationDelegate


@@ -51,6 +54,7 @@ static wxObjcAutoRefFromAlloc<wxNSApplicationObserver*> sg_cocoaAppObserver = [[
 }
 
 @end // implementation wxNSApplicationDelegate : NSObject
 }
 
 @end // implementation wxNSApplicationDelegate : NSObject

+WX_IMPLEMENT_GET_OBJC_CLASS(wxNSApplicationDelegate,NSObject)

 
 // ========================================================================
 // wxNSApplicationObserver
 
 // ========================================================================
 // wxNSApplicationObserver


@@ -88,6 +92,7 @@ static wxObjcAutoRefFromAlloc<wxNSApplicationObserver*> sg_cocoaAppObserver = [[
 }
 
 @end // implementation wxNSApplicationObserver : NSObject
 }
 
 @end // implementation wxNSApplicationObserver : NSObject

+WX_IMPLEMENT_GET_OBJC_CLASS(wxNSApplicationObserver,NSObject)

 
 // ========================================================================
 // wxApp
 
 // ========================================================================
 // wxApp


@@ -97,11 +102,6 @@ static wxObjcAutoRefFromAlloc<wxNSApplicationObserver*> sg_cocoaAppObserver = [[
 // wxApp Static member initialization
 // ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 IMPLEMENT_DYNAMIC_CLASS(wxApp, wxEvtHandler)
 // wxApp Static member initialization
 // ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 IMPLEMENT_DYNAMIC_CLASS(wxApp, wxEvtHandler)

-BEGIN_EVENT_TABLE(wxApp, wxEvtHandler)
-    EVT_IDLE(wxAppBase::OnIdle)
-//    EVT_END_SESSION(wxApp::OnEndSession)
-//    EVT_QUERY_END_SESSION(wxApp::OnQueryEndSession)
-END_EVENT_TABLE()

 
 // ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 // wxApp initialization/cleanup
 
 // ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 // wxApp initialization/cleanup


@@ -125,6 +125,37 @@ bool wxApp::Initialize(int& argc, wxChar **argv)
         }
     }
 
         }
     }
 

+    /*
+        Cocoa supports -Key value options which set the user defaults key "Key"
+        to the value "value"  Some of them are very handy for debugging like
+        -NSShowAllViews YES.  Cocoa picks these up from the real argv so
+        our removal of them from the wx copy of it does not affect Cocoa's
+        ability to see them.
+
+        We basically just assume that any "-NS" option and its following
+        argument needs to be removed from argv.  We hope that user code does
+        not expect to see -NS options and indeed it's probably a safe bet
+        since most user code accepting options is probably using the
+        double-dash GNU-style syntax.
+     */
+    for(int i=1; i < argc; ++i)
+    {
+        static const wxChar *ARG_NS = wxT("-NS");
+        static const int ARG_NS_LEN = wxStrlen(ARG_NS);
+        if( wxStrncmp(argv[i], ARG_NS, ARG_NS_LEN) == 0 )
+        {
+            // Only eat this option if it has an argument
+            if( (i + 1) < argc )
+            {
+                argc -= 2;
+                memmove(argv + i, argv + i + 2, argc * sizeof(wxChar*));
+                // drop back one position so the next run through the loop
+                // reprocesses the argument at our current index.
+                --i;
+            }
+        }
+    }
+

     return wxAppBase::Initialize(argc, argv);
 }
 
     return wxAppBase::Initialize(argc, argv);
 }
 


@@ -132,13 +163,16 @@ void wxApp::CleanUp()
 {
     wxAutoNSAutoreleasePool pool;
 
 {
     wxAutoNSAutoreleasePool pool;
 

-    wxDC::CocoaShutdownTextSystem();
+    wxCocoaDCImpl::CocoaShutdownTextSystem();

     wxMenuBarManager::DestroyInstance();
 
     wxMenuBarManager::DestroyInstance();
 

-    [m_cocoaApp setDelegate:nil];
-    [[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] removeObserver:m_cocoaAppDelegate];
-    [m_cocoaAppDelegate release];
-    m_cocoaAppDelegate = NULL;
+    [[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] removeObserver:sg_cocoaAppObserver];
+    if(!sm_isEmbedded)
+    {
+        [m_cocoaApp setDelegate:nil];
+        [m_cocoaAppDelegate release];
+        m_cocoaAppDelegate = NULL;
+    }

 
     wxAppBase::CleanUp();
 }
 
     wxAppBase::CleanUp();
 }


@@ -150,12 +184,10 @@ wxApp::wxApp()
 {
     m_topWindow = NULL;
 
 {
     m_topWindow = NULL;
 

-#ifdef __WXDEBUG__
-    m_isInAssert = false;
-#endif // __WXDEBUG__
-

     argc = 0;
     argc = 0;

+#if !wxUSE_UNICODE

     argv = NULL;
     argv = NULL;

+#endif

     m_cocoaApp = NULL;
     m_cocoaAppDelegate = NULL;
 }
     m_cocoaApp = NULL;
     m_cocoaAppDelegate = NULL;
 }


@@ -186,9 +218,12 @@ bool wxApp::OnInitGui()
     // Create the app using the sharedApplication method
     m_cocoaApp = [NSApplication sharedApplication];
 
     // Create the app using the sharedApplication method
     m_cocoaApp = [NSApplication sharedApplication];
 

-    // Enable response to application delegate messages
-    m_cocoaAppDelegate = [[wxNSApplicationDelegate alloc] init];
-    [m_cocoaApp setDelegate:m_cocoaAppDelegate];
+    if(!sm_isEmbedded)
+    {
+        // Enable response to application delegate messages
+        m_cocoaAppDelegate = [[WX_GET_OBJC_CLASS(wxNSApplicationDelegate) alloc] init];
+        [m_cocoaApp setDelegate:m_cocoaAppDelegate];
+    }

 
     // Enable response to "delegate" messages on the notification observer
     [[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] addObserver:sg_cocoaAppObserver
 
     // Enable response to "delegate" messages on the notification observer
     [[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] addObserver:sg_cocoaAppObserver


@@ -216,9 +251,10 @@ bool wxApp::OnInitGui()
         selector:@selector(controlTintChanged:)
         name:NSControlTintDidChangeNotification object:nil];
 
         selector:@selector(controlTintChanged:)
         name:NSControlTintDidChangeNotification object:nil];
 

-    wxMenuBarManager::CreateInstance();
+    if(!sm_isEmbedded)
+        wxMenuBarManager::CreateInstance();

 
 

-    wxDC::CocoaInitializeTextSystem();
+    wxCocoaDCImpl::CocoaInitializeTextSystem();

     return true;
 }
 
     return true;
 }
 


@@ -254,56 +290,37 @@ void wxApp::Exit()
     wxAppConsole::Exit();
 }
 
     wxAppConsole::Exit();
 }
 

-// Yield to other processes
-bool wxApp::Yield(bool onlyIfNeeded)
-{
-    // MT-FIXME
-    static bool s_inYield = false;
-
-#if wxUSE_LOG
-    // disable log flushing from here because a call to wxYield() shouldn't
-    // normally result in message boxes popping up &c
-    wxLog::Suspend();
-#endif // wxUSE_LOG
-
-    if (s_inYield)
-    {
-        if ( !onlyIfNeeded )
-        {
-            wxFAIL_MSG( wxT("wxYield called recursively" ) );
-        }
-
-        return false;
-    }
-
-    s_inYield = true;
-
-    // Run the event loop until it is out of events
-    while(1)
-    {
-        wxAutoNSAutoreleasePool pool;
-        NSEvent *event = [GetNSApplication()
-                nextEventMatchingMask:NSAnyEventMask
-                untilDate:[NSDate distantPast]
-                inMode:NSDefaultRunLoopMode
-                dequeue: YES];
-        if(!event)
-            break;
-        [GetNSApplication() sendEvent: event];
-    }
-
-#if wxUSE_LOG
-    // let the logs be flashed again
-    wxLog::Resume();
-#endif // wxUSE_LOG
-
-    s_inYield = false;
-
-    return true;
-}
-

 void wxApp::WakeUpIdle()
 {
 void wxApp::WakeUpIdle()
 {

+    /*  When called from the main thread the NSAutoreleasePool managed by
+        the [NSApplication run] method would ordinarily be in place and so
+        one would think a pool here would be unnecessary.
+
+        However, when called from a different thread there is usually no
+        NSAutoreleasePool in place because wxThread has no knowledge of
+        wxCocoa.  The pool here is generally only ever going to contain
+        the NSEvent we create with the factory method.  As soon as we add
+        it to the main event queue with postEvent:atStart: it is retained
+        and so safe for our pool to release.
+     */
+    wxAutoNSAutoreleasePool pool;
+    /*  NOTE: This is a little heavy handed.  What this does is cause an
+        AppKit NSEvent to be added to NSApplication's queue (which is always
+        on the main thread).  This will cause the main thread runloop to
+        exit which returns control to nextEventMatchingMask which returns
+        the event which is then sent with sendEvent: and essentially dropped
+        since it's not for a window (windowNumber 0) and NSApplication
+        certainly doesn't understand it.
+
+        With the exception of wxEventLoop::Exit which uses us to cause the
+        runloop to exit and return to the NSApplication event loop, most
+        callers only need wx idle to happen, or more specifically only really
+        need to ensure that ProcessPendingEvents is called which is currently
+        done without exiting the runloop.
+
+        Be careful if you decide to change the implementation of this method
+        as wxEventLoop::Exit depends on the current behavior.
+     */

     [m_cocoaApp postEvent:[NSEvent otherEventWithType:NSApplicationDefined
             location:NSZeroPoint modifierFlags:NSAnyEventMask
             timestamp:0 windowNumber:0 context:nil
     [m_cocoaApp postEvent:[NSEvent otherEventWithType:NSApplicationDefined
             location:NSZeroPoint modifierFlags:NSAnyEventMask
             timestamp:0 windowNumber:0 context:nil


@@ -320,6 +337,39 @@ extern "C" static void ObserveMainRunLoopBeforeWaiting(CFRunLoopObserverRef obse
 static int sg_cApplicationWillUpdate = 0;
 #endif
 
 static int sg_cApplicationWillUpdate = 0;
 #endif
 

+/*!
+    Invoked from the applicationWillUpdate notification observer.  See the
+    NSApplication documentation for the official statement on when this
+    will be called.  Since it can be hard to understand for a Cocoa newbie
+    I'll try to explain it here as it relates to wxCocoa.
+
+    Basically, we get called from within nextEventMatchingMask if and only
+    if any user code told the application to send the update notification
+    (sort of like a request for idle events).  However, unlike wx idle events,
+    this notification is sent quite often, nearly every time through the loop
+    because nearly every control tells the application to send it.
+
+    Because wx idle events are only supposed to be sent when the event loop
+    is about to block we instead schedule a function to be called just
+    before the run loop waits and send the idle events from there.
+
+    It also has the desirable effect of only sending the wx idle events when
+    the event loop is actualy going to block.  If the event loop is being
+    pumped manualy (e.g. like a PeekMessage) then the kCFRunLoopBeforeWaiting
+    observer never fires.  Our Yield() method depends on this because sending
+    idle events from within Yield would be bad.
+
+    Normally you might think that we could just set the observer up once and
+    leave it attached.  However, this is problematic because our run loop
+    observer calls user code (the idle handlers) which can actually display
+    modal dialogs.  Displaying a modal dialog causes reentry of the event
+    loop, usually in a different run loop mode than the main loop (e.g. in
+    modal-dialog mode instead of default mode).  Because we only register the
+    observer with the run loop mode at the time of this call, it won't be
+    called from a modal loop.
+
+    We want it to be called and thus we need a new observer.
+ */

 void wxApp::CocoaDelegate_applicationWillUpdate()
 {
     wxLogTrace(wxTRACE_COCOA,wxT("applicationWillUpdate"));
 void wxApp::CocoaDelegate_applicationWillUpdate()
 {
     wxLogTrace(wxTRACE_COCOA,wxT("applicationWillUpdate"));


@@ -328,6 +378,9 @@ void wxApp::CocoaDelegate_applicationWillUpdate()
     CFRunLoopRef cfRunLoop = CFRunLoopGetCurrent();
     wxCFRef<CFStringRef> cfRunLoopMode(CFRunLoopCopyCurrentMode(cfRunLoop));
 
     CFRunLoopRef cfRunLoop = CFRunLoopGetCurrent();
     wxCFRef<CFStringRef> cfRunLoopMode(CFRunLoopCopyCurrentMode(cfRunLoop));
 

+    /*  If we have an observer and that observer is for the wrong run loop
+        mode then invalidate it and release it.
+     */

     if(m_cfRunLoopIdleObserver != NULL && m_cfObservedRunLoopMode != cfRunLoopMode)
     {
         CFRunLoopObserverInvalidate(m_cfRunLoopIdleObserver);
     if(m_cfRunLoopIdleObserver != NULL && m_cfObservedRunLoopMode != cfRunLoopMode)
     {
         CFRunLoopObserverInvalidate(m_cfRunLoopIdleObserver);


@@ -336,6 +389,9 @@ void wxApp::CocoaDelegate_applicationWillUpdate()
 #if 0
     ++sg_cApplicationWillUpdate;
 #endif
 #if 0
     ++sg_cApplicationWillUpdate;
 #endif

+    /*  This will be true either on the first call or when the above code has
+        invalidated and released the exisiting observer.
+     */

     if(m_cfRunLoopIdleObserver == NULL)
     {
         // Enable idle event handling
     if(m_cfRunLoopIdleObserver == NULL)
     {
         // Enable idle event handling


@@ -346,6 +402,13 @@ void wxApp::CocoaDelegate_applicationWillUpdate()
         ,   NULL
         ,   NULL
         };
         ,   NULL
         ,   NULL
         };

+        /*  NOTE: I can't recall why we don't just let the observer repeat
+            instead of invalidating itself each time it fires thus requiring
+            it to be recreated for each shot but there was if I remember
+            some good (but very obscure) reason for it.
+
+            On the other hand, I could be wrong so don't take that as gospel.
+         */

         m_cfRunLoopIdleObserver.reset(CFRunLoopObserverCreate(kCFAllocatorDefault, kCFRunLoopBeforeWaiting, /*repeats*/FALSE, /*priority*/0, ObserveMainRunLoopBeforeWaiting, &observerContext));
         m_cfObservedRunLoopMode = cfRunLoopMode;
         CFRunLoopAddObserver(cfRunLoop, m_cfRunLoopIdleObserver, m_cfObservedRunLoopMode);
         m_cfRunLoopIdleObserver.reset(CFRunLoopObserverCreate(kCFAllocatorDefault, kCFRunLoopBeforeWaiting, /*repeats*/FALSE, /*priority*/0, ObserveMainRunLoopBeforeWaiting, &observerContext));
         m_cfObservedRunLoopMode = cfRunLoopMode;
         CFRunLoopAddObserver(cfRunLoop, m_cfRunLoopIdleObserver, m_cfObservedRunLoopMode);


@@ -363,9 +426,24 @@ static inline bool FakeNeedMoreIdle()
 #endif
 }
 
 #endif
 }
 

+/*!
+    Called by CFRunLoop just before waiting.  This is the appropriate time to
+    send idle events.  Unlike other ports, we don't peek the queue for events
+    and stop idling if there is one.  Instead, if the user requests more idle
+    events we tell Cocoa to send us an applicationWillUpdate notification
+    which will cause our observer of that notification to tell CFRunLoop to
+    call us before waiting which will cause us to be fired again but only
+    after exhausting the event queue.
+
+    The reason we do it this way is that peeking for an event causes CFRunLoop
+    to reenter and fire off its timers, observers, and sources which we're
+    better off avoiding.  Doing it this way, we basically let CFRunLoop do the
+    work of peeking for the next event which is much nicer.
+ */

 void wxApp::CF_ObserveMainRunLoopBeforeWaiting(CFRunLoopObserverRef observer, int activity)
 {
 void wxApp::CF_ObserveMainRunLoopBeforeWaiting(CFRunLoopObserverRef observer, int activity)
 {

-    // Ensure that the app knows we've been invalidated
+    // Ensure that CocoaDelegate_applicationWillUpdate will recreate us.
+    // We've already been invalidated by CFRunLoop because we are one-shot.

     m_cfRunLoopIdleObserver.reset();
 #if 0
     wxLogTrace(wxTRACE_COCOA,wxT("Idle BEGIN (%d)"), sg_cApplicationWillUpdate);
     m_cfRunLoopIdleObserver.reset();
 #if 0
     wxLogTrace(wxTRACE_COCOA,wxT("Idle BEGIN (%d)"), sg_cApplicationWillUpdate);


@@ -384,11 +462,51 @@ void wxApp::CF_ObserveMainRunLoopBeforeWaiting(CFRunLoopObserverRef observer, in
     }
 }
 
     }
 }
 

-#ifdef __WXDEBUG__
-void wxApp::OnAssert(const wxChar *file, int line, const wxChar* cond, const wxChar *msg)
-{
-    m_isInAssert = true;
-    wxAppBase::OnAssert(file, line, cond, msg);
-    m_isInAssert = false;
-}
-#endif // __WXDEBUG__
+/*  A note about Cocoa's event loops vs. run loops:
+
+    It's important to understand that Cocoa has a two-level event loop.  The
+    outer level is run by NSApplication and can only ever happen on the main
+    thread. The nextEventMatchingMask:untilDate:inMode:dequeue: method returns
+    the next event which is then given to sendEvent: to send it.  These
+    methods are defined in NSApplication and are thus part of AppKit.
+
+    Events (NSEvent) are only sent due to actual user actions like clicking
+    the mouse or moving the mouse or pressing a key and so on.  There are no
+    paint events; there are no timer events; there are no socket events; there
+    are no idle events.
+
+    All of those types of "events" have nothing to do with the GUI at all.
+    That is why Cocoa's AppKit doesn't implement them.  Instead, they are
+    implemented in Foundation's NSRunLoop which on OS X uses CFRunLoop
+    to do the actual work.
+
+    How NSApplication uses NSRunLoop is rather interesting.  Basically, it
+    interacts with NSRunLoop only from within the nextEventMatchingMask
+    method.  It passes its inMode: argument almost directly to NSRunLoop
+    and thus CFRunLoop.  The run loop then runs (e.g. loops) until it
+    is told to exit.  The run loop calls the callout functions directly.
+    From within those callout functions the run loop is considered to
+    be running.  Presumably, the AppKit installs a run loop source to
+    receive messages from the window server over the mach port (like a
+    socket).  For some messages (e.g. need to paint) the AppKit will
+    call application code like drawRect: without exiting the run loop.
+    For other messages (ones that can be encapsulated in an NSEvent)
+    the AppKit tells the run loop to exit which returns control to
+    the nextEventMatchingMask method which then returns the NSEvent
+    object.  It's important to note that once the runloop has exited
+    it is no longer considered running and thus if you ask it which
+    mode it is running in it will return nil.
+
+    When manually pumping the event loop care should be taken to
+    tell it to run in the correct mode.  For instance, if you are
+    using it to run a modal dialog then you want to run it in
+    the modal panel run loop mode.  AppKit presumably has sources
+    or timers or observers that specifically don't listen on this
+    mode.  Another interesting mode is the connection reply mode.
+    This allows Cocoa to wait for a response from a distributed
+    objects message without firing off user code that may result
+    in a DO call being made thus recursing.  So basically, the
+    mode is a way for Cocoa to attempt to avoid run loop recursion
+    but to allow it under certain circumstances.
+ */
+