always define wxUSE_RICHEDIT[2] -- this is better than never defining them (closes...

[wxWidgets.git] / docs / doxygen / overviews / refcount.h

diff --git a/docs/doxygen/overviews/refcount.h b/docs/doxygen/overviews/refcount.h
index 5feb42767ee9aa1530c1f766d4c6a720852d78b1..75454a80c3149b673b9b92d969389aadc5b0c3dc 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/doxygen/overviews/refcount.h
+++ b/docs/doxygen/overviews/refcount.h
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 // Licence:     wxWindows license
 /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
-/*!
+/**
 
 @page overview_refcount Reference Counting
 
@@ -41,9 +41,10 @@ operation on it is the same.
 
 @section overview_refcount_equality Object Comparison
 
-The == and != operators of the reference counted classes always do a @c deep
-comparison. This means that the equality operator will return @true if two
-objects are identical and not only if they share the same data.
+The == and != operators of @ref overview_refcount_list "the reference counted classes"
+always do a <em>deep comparison</em>. This means that the equality operator
+will return @true if two objects are identical and not only if they share the
+same data.
 
 Note that wxWidgets follows the <em>STL philosophy</em>: when a comparison
 operator can not be implemented efficiently (like for e.g. wxImage's ==
@@ -52,8 +53,8 @@ it's not implemented at all. That's why not all reference counted classes
 provide comparison operators.
 
 Also note that if you only need to do a @c shallow comparison between two
-#wxObject derived classes, you should not use the == and != operators but
-rather the wxObject::IsSameAs function.
+wxObject derived classes, you should not use the == and != operators but
+rather the wxObject::IsSameAs() function.
 
 
 @section overview_refcount_destruct Object Destruction
@@ -71,38 +72,42 @@ it.
 The following classes in wxWidgets have efficient (i.e. fast) assignment
 operators and copy constructors since they are reference-counted:
 
-@li #wxAcceleratorTable
-@li #wxAnimation
-@li #wxBitmap
-@li #wxBrush
-@li #wxCursor
-@li #wxFont
-@li #wxIcon
-@li #wxImage
-@li #wxMetafile
-@li #wxPalette
-@li #wxPen
-@li #wxRegion
-@li #wxString
-@li #wxVariant
-@li #wxVariantData
+@li wxAcceleratorTable
+@li wxAnimation
+@li wxBitmap
+@li wxBrush
+@li wxCursor
+@li wxFont
+@li wxIcon
+@li wxImage
+@li wxMetafile
+@li wxPalette
+@li wxPen
+@li wxRegion
+@li wxString
+@li wxVariant
+@li wxVariantData
 
 Note that the list above reports the objects which are reference counted in all
 ports of wxWidgets; some ports may use this technique also for other classes.
 
+All the objects implement a function @b IsOk() to test if they are referencing valid
+data; when the objects are in uninitialized state, you can only use the @b IsOk() getter;
+trying to call any other getter, e.g. wxBrush::GetStyle() on the ::wxNullBrush object,
+will result in an assert failure in debug builds.
+
 
 @section overview_refcount_object Making Your Own Reference Counted Class
 
-Reference counting can be implemented easily using #wxObject and
-#wxObjectRefData classes. Alternatively, you can also use the
-#wxObjectDataPtr<T> template.
+Reference counting can be implemented easily using wxObject and wxObjectRefData
+classes. Alternatively, you can also use the wxObjectDataPtr<T> template.
 
-First, derive a new class from #wxObjectRefData and put there the
+First, derive a new class from wxObjectRefData and put there the
 memory-consuming data.
 
-Then derive a new class from #wxObject and implement there the public interface
+Then derive a new class from wxObject and implement there the public interface
 which will be seen by the user of your class. You'll probably want to add a
-function to your class which does the cast from #wxObjectRefData to your
+function to your class which does the cast from wxObjectRefData to your
 class-specific shared data. For example:
 
 @code
@@ -116,7 +121,7 @@ In fact, any time you need to read the data from your wxObject-derived class,
 you will need to call this function.
 
 @note Any time you need to actually modify the data placed inside your wxObject
-derived class, you must first call the wxObject::UnShare function to ensure
+derived class, you must first call the wxObject::UnShare() function to ensure
 that the modifications won't affect other instances which are eventually
 sharing your object's data.