+We are adopting the Linux kernel style of numbering system where odd minor version numbers are development
+versions, and even numbers are stable versions. For example, 2.1.x are development releases,
+and the next 'stable' or final release of it would be 2.2.<P>
+
+Bug-fix patches to the stable release (if made) then become point
+releases of 2.2 (2.2.x) while development continues with wild abandon
+on 2.3.x until the end of the next development cycle when it is
+released as 2.4.<P>
+
+Development versions that end up on the FTP site or CD-ROM, as opposed to remaining
+in the CVS archive, are semi-stable -- i.e. they are checked for compilation and
+run-time problems, but not as thoroughly as the stable versions.<P>
+
+Note that since the wxWindows effort is voluntary, these are not hard-and-fast deadlines: