\section{wxString overview}\label{wxstringoverview}
-Classes: \helpref{wxString}{wxstring}, \helpref{wxArrayString}{wxarray}, \helpref{wxStringTokenizer}{wxstringtokenizer}
+Classes: \helpref{wxString}{wxstring}, \helpref{wxArrayString}{wxarraystring}, \helpref{wxStringTokenizer}{wxstringtokenizer}
\subsection{Introduction}
arbitrary characters. The ASCII NUL character is allowed, although care should be
taken when passing strings containing it to other functions.
-wxString only works with ASCII (8 bit characters) strings as of this release,
-but support for UNICODE (16 but characters) is planned for the next one.
+wxString works with both ASCII (8 bit characters) as well as UNICODE (16 but
+characters) strings.
This class has all the standard operations you can expect to find in a string class:
-dynamic memory management (string extends to accomodate new characters),
+dynamic memory management (string extends to accommodate new characters),
construction from other strings, C strings and characters, assignment operators,
access to individual characters, string concatenation and comparison, substring
extraction, case conversion, trimming and padding (with spaces), searching and
The advantages of using a special string class instead of working directly with
C strings are so obvious that there is a huge number of such classes available.
The most important advantage is the need to always
-remember to allocate/free memory for C strings; working with fixed size buffers almost inevitably leads to buffer overflows).
-At last, C++ has a standard string class (std::string). So why the need for wxString?
+remember to allocate/free memory for C strings; working with fixed size buffers almost
+inevitably leads to buffer overflows. At last, C++ has a standard string class
+(std::string). So why the need for wxString?
There are several advantages:
However, there are several problems as well. The most important one is probably
that there are often several functions to do exactly the same thing: for
example, to get the length of the string either one of
-\helpref{length()}{wxstringlength}, \helpref{Len()}{wxstringlen} or
-\helpref{Length()}{wxstringLength} may be used. The first function, as almost
+length(), \helpref{Len()}{wxstringlen} or
+\helpref{Length()}{wxstringlength} may be used. The first function, as almost
all the other functions in lowercase, is std::string compatible. The second one
is "native" wxString version and the last one is wxWindows 1.xx way. So the
question is: which one is better to use? And the answer is that:
when used outside wxWindows) and by staying compatible with future versions of
wxWindows which will probably start using std::string sooner or later too.
-In the situations where there is no correspondinw std::string function, please
+In the situations where there is no corresponding std::string function, please
try to use the new wxString methods and not the old wxWindows 1.xx variants
which are deprecated and may disappear in future versions.
\subsection{Other string related functions and classes}
-As most programs use character strings, the standard C library provides quite a
-few functions to work with them. Unfortunately, some of them have rather
-counter-intuitive behaviour (like strncpy() which doesn't always terminate the resulting
-string with a NULL) and are in general not very safe (passing NULL to them will
-probably lead to program crash). Moreover, some very useful functions are not
-standard at all. This is why in addition to all wxString functions, there are
-also a few global string functions which try to correct these problems:
-\helpref{IsEmpty()}{wxstringisempty} verifies whether the string is empty (returning
-TRUE for NULL pointers), \helpref{Strlen()}{wxstringstrlen} also handles NULLs correctly
-and returns 0 for them and \helpref{Stricmp()}{wxstringstricmp} is just a
-platform-independent version of case-insensitive string comparison function
-known either as stricmp() or strcasecmp() on different platforms.
+As most programs use character strings, the standard C library provides quite
+a few functions to work with them. Unfortunately, some of them have rather
+counter-intuitive behaviour (like strncpy() which doesn't always terminate the
+resulting string with a NULL) and are in general not very safe (passing NULL
+to them will probably lead to program crash). Moreover, some very useful
+functions are not standard at all. This is why in addition to all wxString
+functions, there are also a few global string functions which try to correct
+these problems: \helpref{wxIsEmpty()}{wxisempty} verifies whether the string
+is empty (returning {\tt TRUE} for {\tt NULL} pointers),
+\helpref{wxStrlen()}{wxstrlen} also handles NULLs correctly and returns 0 for
+them and \helpref{wxStricmp()}{wxstricmp} is just a platform-independent
+version of case-insensitive string comparison function known either as
+stricmp() or strcasecmp() on different platforms.
+
+The {\tt <wx/string.h>} header also defines \helpref{wxSnprintf}{wxsnprintf}
+and \helpref{wxVsnprintf}{wxvsnprintf} functions which should be used instead
+of the inherently dangerous standard {\tt sprintf()} and which use {\tt
+snprintf()} instead which does buffer size checks whenever possible. Of
+course, you may also use \helpref{wxString::Printf}{wxstringprintf} which is
+also safe.
There is another class which might be useful when working with wxString:
\helpref{wxStringTokenizer}{wxstringtokenizer}. It is helpful when a string must
be broken into tokens and replaces the standard C library {\it
strtok()} function.
-And the very last string-related class is \helpref{wxArrayString}{wxarray}: it
+And the very last string-related class is \helpref{wxArrayString}{wxarraystring}: it
is just a version of the "template" dynamic array class which is specialized to work
with strings. Please note that this class is specially optimized (using its
knowledge of the internal structure of wxString) for storing strings and so it is
But as soon as one of the two (or more) strings is modified, the data has to be
copied because the changes to one of the strings shouldn't be seen in the
-otheres. As data copying only happens when the string is written to, this is
+others. As data copying only happens when the string is written to, this is
known as COW.
What is important to understand is that all this happens absolutely
counting is when a string character is taken from a string which is not a
constant (or a constant reference). In this case, due to C++ rules, the
"read-only" {\it operator[]} (which is the same as
-\helpref{GetChar()}{wxstringgetchar}) cannot be chosen and the "read/write"
+\helpref{GetChar()}{wxstringgetchar}) cannot be chosen and the "read/write"
{\it operator[]} (the same as
\helpref{GetWritableChar()}{wxstringgetwritablechar}) is used instead. As the
call to this operator may modify the string, its data is unshared (COW is done)
absolutely not necessary to read for using wxString class. Please skip it unless
you feel familiar with profilers and relative tools. If you do read it, please
also read the preceding section about
-\helpref{reference counting}{wxstringrefcounting}.}
+\helpref{reference counting}{wxstringrefcount}.}
For the performance reasons wxString doesn't allocate exactly the amount of
memory needed for each string. Instead, it adds a small amount of space to each
them on stderr on program termination. This will show you the average length of
strings your program manipulates, their average initial length and also the
percent of times when memory wasn't reallocated when string concatenation was
-done but the alread preallocated memory was used (this value should be about
+done but the already preallocated memory was used (this value should be about
98\% for the default allocation policy, if it is less than 90\% you should
really consider fine tuning wxString for your application).
projects / wxWidgets.git / blobdiff