+ if test "$wx_cv_func_pthread_cleanup_push" = "yes"; then
+ AC_DEFINE(HAVE_THREAD_CLEANUP_FUNCTIONS)
+ fi
+
+ dnl mutexattr_t initialization is done in quite different ways on different
+ dnl platforms, so check for a few things:
+ dnl
+ dnl HAVE_MUTEX_RECURSIVE means that we can create recursive mutexes
+ dnl HAVE_MUTEXATTR_SETTYPE means that we do it using
+ dnl pthread_mutexattr_settype(PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE) and if it is not
+ dnl defined, we do it by directly assigned
+ dnl PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP to attr
+
+ AC_CACHE_CHECK([for pthread_mutexattr_t], wx_cv_type_pthread_mutexattr_t,
+ [
+ AC_TRY_COMPILE([#include <pthread.h>],
+ [
+ pthread_mutexattr_t attr;
+ pthread_mutexattr_settype(&attr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE);
+ ], [
+ wx_cv_type_pthread_mutexattr_t=yes
+ ], [
+ wx_cv_type_pthread_mutexattr_t=no
+ ]
+ )
+ ])
+
+ if test "$wx_cv_type_pthread_mutexattr_t" = "yes"; then
+ AC_DEFINE(HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEXATTR_T)
+ else
+ dnl don't despair, there may be another way to do it
+ AC_CACHE_CHECK([for PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER],
+ wx_cv_type_pthread_rec_mutex_init,
+ [
+ AC_TRY_COMPILE([#include <pthread.h>],
+ [
+ pthread_mutex_t attr = PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP;
+ ], [
+ wx_cv_type_pthread_rec_mutex_init=yes
+ ], [
+ wx_cv_type_pthread_rec_mutex_init=no
+ ]
+ )
+ ])
+ if test "$wx_cv_type_pthread_rec_mutex_init" = "yes"; then
+ AC_DEFINE(HAVE_PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER)
+ else
+ dnl this may break code working elsewhere, so at least warn about it
+ AC_MSG_WARN([wxMutex won't be recursive on this platform])
+ fi
+ fi
+