// Created: 29.12.99
// RCS-ID: $Id$
// Copyright: (c) 1999 Vadim Zeitlin <zeitlin@dptmaths.ens-cachan.fr>
-// Licence: wxWindows license
+// Licence: wxWindows licence
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// ============================================================================
wxDefaultSize,
wxSP_ARROW_KEYS | wxCLIP_SIBLINGS,
-4300, 10000, cal->GetDate().GetYear())
+
{
m_cal = cal;
}
{
wxSize sizeCombo = m_comboMonth->GetSize();
wxSize sizeStatic = m_staticMonth->GetSize();
-
+ wxSize sizeSpin = m_spinYear->GetSize();
int dy = (sizeCombo.y - sizeStatic.y) / 2;
-
+/*
+In the calender the size of the combobox for the year
+is just defined by a margin from the month combobox to
+the left border. While in wxUniv the year control can't
+show all 4 digits, in wxMsw it show almost twice as
+much. Instead the year should use it's best size and be
+left aligned to the calendar. Just in case the month in
+any language is longer than it has space in the
+calendar it is shortend.This way the year always can
+show the 4 digits.
+
+This patch relies on the fact that a combobox has a
+good best size implementation. This is not the case
+with wxMSW but I don't know why.
+
+Otto Wyss
+*/
+
+#ifdef __WXUNIVERSAL__
+ if (sizeCombo.x + HORZ_MARGIN - sizeSpin.x > width)
+ {
+ m_comboMonth->SetSize(x, y, width - HORZ_MARGIN - sizeSpin.x, sizeCombo.y);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ m_comboMonth->Move(x, y);
+ }
+ m_staticMonth->Move(x, y + dy);
+ m_spinYear->Move(x + width - sizeSpin.x, y);
+ m_staticYear->Move(x + width - sizeSpin.x, y + dy);
+#else
m_comboMonth->Move(x, y);
m_staticMonth->SetSize(x, y + dy, sizeCombo.x, sizeStatic.y);
m_spinYear->SetSize(x + xDiff, y, width - xDiff, sizeCombo.y);
m_staticYear->SetSize(x + xDiff, y + dy, width - xDiff, sizeStatic.y);
-
- wxSize sizeSpin = m_spinYear->GetSize();
+#endif
yDiff = wxMax(sizeSpin.y, sizeCombo.y) + VERT_MARGIN;
}
else // no controls on the top