]> git.saurik.com Git - wxWidgets.git/blame_incremental - docs/html/faqgen.htm
More null virtuals in wxRadioBoxBase (see: 'Developers_Notebook-Incomplete-API' in...
[wxWidgets.git] / docs / html / faqgen.htm
... / ...
CommitLineData
1
2<HTML>
3
4<HEAD>
5<TITLE>wxWidgets FAQ: General</TITLE>
6</HEAD>
7
8<BODY BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF TEXT=#000000 VLINK="#00376A" LINK="#00529C" ALINK="#313063">
9
10<font face="Arial, Lucida Sans, Helvetica">
11
12<table width=100% border=0 cellpadding=3 cellspacing=0>
13<tr>
14<td bgcolor="#004080" align=left height=24 background="images/bluetitlegradient.gif">
15<font size=+1 face="Arial, Lucida Sans, Helvetica" color="#FFFFFF">
16<b>wxWidgets FAQ: General</b>
17</font>
18</td>
19</tr>
20</table>
21
22<P>
23
24See also <a href="faq.htm">top-level FAQ page</a>.
25<hr>
26<h3>List of questions in this category</h3>
27<ul>
28<li><a href="#whatis">What is wxWidgets?</a></li>
29<li><a href="#licence">Can I use wxWidgets for both proprietary projects, and GPL&#39;ed projects?</a></li>
30<li><a href="#support">Is there support?</a></li>
31<li><a href="#users">Who uses wxWidgets?</a></li>
32<li><a href="#platforms">What platforms are supported by wxWidgets?</a></li>
33<li><a href="#specific">How does wxWidgets support platform-specific features?</a></li>
34<li><a href="#stl">Does wxWidgets use STL? or the standard string class?</a></li>
35<li><a href="#richedit">Is there a rich edit/markup widget for wxWidgets?</a></ li>
36<li><a href="#exceptions">How to use C++ exceptions with wxWidgets?</a></ li>
37<li><a href="#dev">How is wxWidgets being developed?</a></li>
38<li><a href="#distrib">How is wxWidgets distributed?</a></li>
39<!--
40<li><a href="#future">What are the plans for the future?</a></li>
41-->
42<li><a href="#base">What is wxBase?</a></li>
43<li><a href="#univ">What is wxUniversal?</a></li>
44<li><a href="#jave">What about Java?</a></li>
45<li><a href="#dotnet">What about .NET/Mono?</a></li>
46<li><a href="#help">How can I help the project?</a></li>
47<li><a href="#newport">How do I start a new port?</a></li>
48</ul>
49<hr>
50
51<H3><a name="whatis">What is wxWidgets?</a></H3>
52
53wxWidgets is a class library that allows you to compile graphical C++ programs on a range of
54different platforms. wxWidgets defines a common API across platforms, but uses the native graphical user interface (GUI) on each platform,
55so your program will take on the native &#39;look and feel&#39; that users are familiar with.<P>
56
57Although GUI applications are mostly built programmatically, there are several dialog editors to help
58build attractive dialogs and panels. Robert Roebling&#39;s <a href="http://www.roebling.com">wxDesigner</a>
59and Anthemion Software&#39;s <a href="http://www.anthemion.co.uk/dialogblocks/" target=_new>DialogBlocks</a>
60are two commercial examples, but there are others: see the <a href="lnk_tool.htm">Useful Tools</a> page.<P>
61
62You don&#39;t have to use C++ to use wxWidgets: there is a <a href="http://wxpython.org">Python interface</a> for wxWidgets,
63and also a <a href="http://wxperl.sourceforge.net" target=_top>Perl interface</a>.
64<P>
65
66<h3><a name="licence">Can I use wxWidgets for both proprietary (commercial) projects, and GPL&#39;ed projects?</a></h3>
67
68Yes. Please see the <a href="newlicen.htm">licence</a> for details, but basically
69you can distribute proprietary binaries without distributing any source code, and neither will wxWidgets
70conflict with GPL code you may be using or developing with it.
71<P>
72The conditions for using wxWidgets are the same whether you are a personal, academic
73or commercial developer.
74<P>
75
76<h3><a name="support">Is there support?</a></h3>
77
78No official support, but the mailing list is very helpful and some people say that
79wxWidgets support is better than for much commercial software. The developers are
80keen to fix bugs as soon as possible, though obviously there are no guarantees.
81<P>
82
83<H3><a name="users">Who uses wxWidgets?</a></H3>
84
85Many organisations - commercial, government, and academic - across the
86world. It&#39;s impossible to estimate the true number of users, since
87wxWidgets is obtained by many different means, and we cannot monitor
88distribution. The mailing list contains around 300-400 entries which is
89quite large for a list of this type.<P>
90
91See <a href="users.htm">Users</a> for a list of some users and their applications, and
92also <A href="feedback.htm">Feedback</a> for comments.<P>
93Our highest-profile user yet is industry veteran and Lotus Corp. founder Mitch Kapor
94and his <a href="http://www.osafoundation.org" target=_new>Open Source Applications Foundation</a>.
95<P>
96
97<H3><a name="platforms">What platforms are supported by wxWidgets?</a></H3>
98
99<ul>
100<li>Windows 3.1, Windows 95/98, Windows NT, Windows 2000, Windows ME.
101<li>Linux and other Unix platforms with GTK+.
102<li>Unix with Motif or the free Motif clone Lesstif.
103<li>Mac OS.
104<li>Embedded platforms are being investigated. See the <a href="wxuniv.htm">wxUniversal</a> project.
105<li>An OS/2 port is in progress, and you can also compile wxWidgets for GTK+ or Motif
106on OS/2.
107</ul>
108<P>
109
110<H3><a name="specific">How does wxWidgets support platform-specific
111features?</a></H3>
112
113This is a hotly-debated topic amongst the developers. My own philosophy
114is to make wxWidgets as platform-independent as possible, but allow in a
115few classes (functions, window styles) that are platform-specific.
116For example, Windows metafiles and Windows 95 taskbar icons have
117their own classes on Windows, but nowhere else. Because these classes
118are provided and are wxWidgets-compatible, it doesn&#39;t take much
119coding effort for an application programmer to add support for
120some functionality that the user on a particular platform might otherwise
121miss. Also, some classes that started off as platform-specific, such
122as the MDI classes, have been emulated on other platforms. I can imagine
123that even wxTaskBarIcon may be implemented for Unix desktops one day.
124<P>
125
126In other words, wxWidgets is not a &#39;lowest common denominator&#39; approach,
127but it will still be possible to write portable programs using the
128core API. Forbidding some platform-specific classes would be a stupid
129approach that would alienate many potential users, and encourage
130the perception that toolkits such as wxWidgets are not up to the demands
131of today&#39;s sophisticated applications.<P>
132
133Currently resources such as bitmaps and icons are handled in a platform-specific
134way, but it is hoped to reduce this dependence in due course.<P>
135
136Another reason why wxWidgets is not a &#39;lowest common denominator&#39; toolkit is that
137some functionality missing on some platform has been provided using generic,
138platform-independent code, such as the wxTreeCtrl and wxListCtrl classes.<P>
139
140<H3><a name="stl">Does wxWidgets use STL? or the standard string class?</a></H3>
141
142No. This is a much-discussed topic that has (many times) ended with the conclusion that it is in
143wxWidgets&#39; best interests to avoid use of templates. Not all compilers can handle
144templates adequately so it would dramatically reduce the number of compilers
145and platforms that could be supported. It would also be undesirable to make
146wxWidgets dependent on another large library that may have to be downloaded and installed.
147In addition, use of templates can lead to executable bloat, which is something
148wxWidgets is strenuously trying to avoid.<P>
149
150The standard C++ string class is not used, again because it is not available to all compilers,
151and it is not necessarily a very efficient implementation. Also, we retain more flexibility
152by being able to modify our own string class. Some compatibility with the string class
153has been built into wxString.<P>
154
155There is nothing to stop an application using templates or the string class for its own
156purposes. With wxWidgets debugging options on, you may find you get errors when including
157STL headers. You can work around it either by switching off memory checking,
158or by adding this to a header before you include any STL files:<P>
159
160<PRE>
161&#35;ifdef new
162&#35;undef new
163&#35;endif
164</PRE>
165
166<P>
167
168
169<H3><a name="richedit">Is there a rich edit/markup widget for wxWidgets?</a></H3>
170
171These are the possibilities so far:<P>
172
173<ul>
174<li>See <a href="http://www.scintilla.org" target=_top>www.scintilla.org</a> for
175a very nice syntax-highlighting editor widget. Robin Dunn has written a wxWidgets wrapper
176for this widget, available in the wxWidgets distribution under contrib/src/stc.
177<li>If you only need to display marked-up information, rather than edit it,
178then wxHTML will suit your needs. wxHTML is built into wxWidgets - please see the reference
179manual for details, and samples/html.
180<li>There are rich edit widgets in both WIN32 and GTK+, but there is currently
181no wxWidgets wrapper for these (but text attribute functions are being added in the wxWidgets 2.3.x series).
182</ul>
183
184<P>
185
186<h3><a name="exceptions">How to use C++ exceptions with wxWidgets?</a></h3>
187
188wxWidgets library itself is unfortunately <i>not</i> exception-safe (as its
189initial version predates, by far, the addition of the exceptions to the C++
190language). However you can still use the exceptions in your own code and use
191the other libraries using the exceptions for the error reporting together with
192wxWidgets.
193
194<p>
195There are a few issues to keep in mind, though:
196<ul>
197 <li>You shouldn&#39;t let the exceptions propagate through wxWidgets code,
198 in particular you should always catch the exceptions thrown by the
199 functions called from an event handler in the handler itself and not
200 let them propagate upwards to wxWidgets.
201
202 <li>You may need to ensure that the compiler support for the exceptions is
203 enabled as, considering that wxWidgets itself doesn&#39;t use the
204 exceptions and turning their support on results in the library size
205 augmentation of 10% to 20%, it is turned off by default for a few
206 compilers. Moreover, for gcc (or at least its mingw version) you must
207 also turn on the RTTI support to be able to use the exceptions, so you
208 should use <tt>--disable-no_rtti --disable-no_exceptions</tt> options
209 when configuring the library (attention to the double negation).
210</ul>
211
212<p>
213
214<H3><a name="dev">How is wxWidgets being developed?</a></H3>
215
216We are using the <a href="cvs.htm">CVS</a> system to develop and maintain wxWidgets. This allows
217us to make alterations and upload them instantly to the server, from
218which others can update their source.<P>
219
220To build source from CVS, see the file BuildCVS.txt in the top-level wxWidgets distribution
221directory.<P>
222
223<H3><a name="distrib">How is wxWidgets distributed?</a></H3>
224
225By ftp, and via the <a href="cdrom2.htm">wxWidgets CD-ROM</a>.
226<P>
227If you are feeling adventurous, you may also check out the sources directly
228from <a href="cvs.htm">cvs</a>.
229<p>
230
231<!--
232<H3><a name="future">What are the plans for the future?</a></H3>
233
234TODO
235
236<p>
237
238-->
239
240<h3><a name="base">What is wxBase?</a></h3>
241
242wxBase is a subset of wxWidgets comprised by the non-GUI classes. It includes
243wxWidgets container and primitive data type classes (including wxString,
244wxDateTime and so on) and also useful wrappers for the operating system objects
245such as files, processes, threads, sockets and so on. With very minor
246exceptions wxBase may be used in exactly the same way as wxWidgets but it
247doesn&#39;t require a GUI to run and so is ideal for creating console mode
248utilities or server programs. It is also possible to create a program which can
249be compiled either as a console application (using wxBase) or a GUI one (using
250a full featured wxWidgets port).
251
252<H3><a name="univ">What is wxUniversal?</a></H3>
253
254The main difference between wxUniversal-based ports (such as wxX11, wxMGL) and other ports (such as wxMSW, wxGTK+, wxMac)
255is that wxUniversal implements all controls (or widgets) in
256wxWidgets itself thus allowing to have much more flexibility (for example, support for
257themes even under MS Windows). It also means that it is now much easier to
258port wxWidgets to a new platform as only the low-level classes must be ported
259which make for a small part of the library.
260<p>
261You may find more about wxUniversal <a href=wxuniv.htm>here</a>.
262
263<H3><a name="jave">What about Java?</a></H3>
264
265The Java honeymoon period is over :-) and people are realising that it cannot
266meet all their cross-platform development needs. We don&#39;t anticipate a major threat
267from Java, and the level of interest in wxWidgets is as high as ever.<P>
268
269<H3><a name="dotnet">What about .NET/Mono?</a></H3>
270
271Microsoft is spending a lot on promoting the .NET initiative, which
272is a set of languages, APIs and web service components for Windows.
273Ximian has started an open source version of .NET, mostly for Linux.
274C&#35; is Microsoft&#39;s alternative to Java, supporting &#39;managed code&#39;,
275garbage collection and various other Java-like language features.<P>
276
277Although this may be attractive to some developers, there
278is a variety of reasons why the .NET/Mono combination is unlikely
279to make wxWidgets redundant. Please note that the following comments
280are Julian Smart&#39;s opinions.<P>
281
282<ol>
283<li>Not everyone wants or needs net services.
284<li>C++ will be used for a long time to come; compared with C++, C&#35; is a recent development and its future is not certain.
285<li>Mono Forms may only target Winelib (at least to begin with), so the end result is not as native as
286wxWidgets (I&#39;m aware there is GTK&#35; for use with the C&#35; language).
287<li>C&#35; is usually byte-compiled and therefore slower. Plus, .NET adds a layer of overhead to the client computer
288that wxWidgets does not require.
289<li>Mono hasn&#39;t proven its long-term viability yet (it&#39;s a complex system of components); wxWidgets is ready now.
290<li>You may not wish to buy into Microsoft marketing spin and APIs.
291<li>Microsoft may at some point sue developers of non-Microsoft .NET implementations. After all,
292platform-independence is not in Microsoft&#39;s interest.
293<li>.NET might never be implemented on some platforms, especially Mac and embedded variants of Linux.
294<li>wxPython and other language variants provide further reasons for wxWidgets to continue.
295<li>The same issue exists for Qt: if Qt sales remain strong, it&#39;s a good indication that
296the market for a C++-based approach is still there. (Either that, or everyone&#39;s turning to wxWidgets!)
297</ol>
298
299There is nothing to stop folk from developing a C&#35; version of the wxWidgets API;
300we already have bindings to Python, Perl, JavaScript, Lua, Basic, and Eiffel.
301Update: a <a href="http://wxnet.sourceforge.net/" target=_new>wx.NET</a> project is now in progress.
302
303<P>
304
305<H3><a name="help">How can I help the project?</a></H3>
306
307Please check out the <a href="http://www.wxwidgets.org/develop2.htm">Community</a> pages,
308in particular the <a href="projects.htm">suggested projects</a>, and
309mail the developers&#39; mailing list with your own suggestions.<P>
310
311<H3><a name="newport">How do I start a new port?</a></H3>
312
313Please subscribe to the wx-dev <a href="maillst2.htm">developers&#39; mailing list</a> and
314ask if anyone else is interested in helping with the port, or
315has specific suggestions. Also please read the <a href="standard.htm">coding standards</a>.
316
317<P>
318Each port consists of a platform-specific part (e.g. src/msw, include/wx/msw),
319a generic set of widgets and dialogs for when the port doesn&#39;t support
320them natively (src/generic, include/wx/generic) and the common code
321that all ports use (src/common, include/wx). By browsing the source
322you should get a good idea of the general pattern.<P>
323
324Take a port that most closely matches your port, and strip out
325the implementation so you have a skeleton port that compiles. Ask on wx-dev
326first for the wxStubs port - however, any such predefined skeleton
327port may be out of date, so make a judgement on whether to use it.
328Perhaps it will still save you time to clean up wxStubs, and
329others may benefit from this too.<P>
330
331You will need to define a symbol for the new port, e.g. __WXXBOX__.
332Look at files such as wx/defs.h, wx/wxchar.h for areas where you&#39;ll
333need to add to existing conditionals to set up wide character
334support and other issues. If the GUI runs on a Unix variant,
335define the __UNIX__ variable in your makefile.<P>
336
337Then you can start implementing the port, starting with
338wxWindow, wxTopLevelWindow, wxFrame, wxDialog so you
339can get the minimal sample running as soon as possible.<P>
340
341If GDI objects (wxPen, wxBrush, etc.) are not concepts in your
342native GUI, you may wish to use very generic versions of
343some of these - see the wxX11 port.<P>
344
345Consider using the wxUniversal widget set as a quick way
346to implement wxWidgets on your platform. You only need
347to define some basic classes such as device contexts,
348wxWindow, wxTopLevelWindow, GDI objects etc. and
349the actual widgets will be drawn for you. See wxX11,
350wxMGL, and wxMSW/Univ for sample wxUniversal ports.<P>
351
352To begin with, you can use whatever makefiles or project
353files work for you. Look at existing makefiles to see what
354generic/common/Unix files need to be included. Later, you&#39;ll want to integrate support
355for your port into configure (Unix-like systems and gcc under Windows),
356and bakefile (for other makefiles on Windows).<P>
357
358Submit your port as patches via SourceForge; you might
359wish to separate it into one patch that touches common headers
360and source files, and another containing the port-specific code, to make
361it much easier for us to review and apply the patches.<P>
362
363Good luck!
364
365</font>
366
367</BODY>
368
369</HTML>