don't call wxYield() from EnsureVisible(), this is too dangerous - and unnecessary...

[wxWidgets.git] / docs / latex / wx / tunicode.tex

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% Name:        tunicode.tex
%% Purpose:     Overview of the Unicode support in wxWindows
%% Author:      Vadim Zeitlin
%% Modified by:
%% Created:     22.09.99
%% RCS-ID:      $Id$
%% Copyright:   (c) 1999 Vadim Zeitlin <zeitlin@dptmaths.ens-cachan.fr>
%% Licence:     wxWindows license
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

\section{Unicode support in wxWindows}\label{unicode}

This section briefly describes the state of the Unicode support in wxWindows.
Read it if you want to know more about how to write programs able to work with
characters from languages other than English.

\subsection{What is Unicode?}

Starting with release 2.1 wxWindows has support for compiling in Unicode mode
on the platforms which support it. Unicode is a standard for character
encoding which addresses the shortcomings of the previous, 8 bit standards, by
using 16 bit for encoding each character. This allows to have 65536 characters
instead of the usual 256 and is sufficient to encode all of the world
languages at once. More details about Unicode may be found at {\tt www.unicode.org}.

% TODO expand on it, say that Unicode extends ASCII, mention ISO8859, ...

As this solution is obviously preferable to the previous ones (think of
incompatible encodings for the same language, locale chaos and so on), many
modern operating systems support it. The probably first example is Windows NT
which uses only Unicode internally since its very first version.

Writing internationalized programs is much easier with Unicode and, as the
support for it improves, it should become more and more so. Moreover, in the
Windows NT/2000 case, even the program which uses only standard ASCII can profit
from using Unicode because they will work more efficiently - there will be no
need for the system to convert all strings the program uses to/from Unicode
each time a system call is made.

\subsection{Unicode and ANSI modes}

As not all platforms supported by wxWindows support Unicode (fully) yet, in
many cases it is unwise to write a program which can only work in Unicode
environment. A better solution is to write programs in such way that they may
be compiled either in ANSI (traditional) mode or in the Unicode one.

This can be achieved quite simply by using the means provided by wxWindows.
Basically, there are only a few things to watch out for:

\begin{itemize}
\item Character type ({\tt char} or {\tt wchar\_t})
\item Literal strings (i.e. {\tt "Hello, world!"} or {\tt '*'})
\item String functions ({\tt strlen()}, {\tt strcpy()}, ...)
\end{itemize}

Let's look at them in order. First of all, each character in an Unicode
program takes 2 bytes instead of usual one, so another type should be used to
store the characters ({\tt char} only holds 1 byte usually). This type is
called {\tt wchar\_t} which stands for {\it wide-character type}.

Also, the string and character constants should be encoded on 2 bytes instead
of one. This is achieved by using the standard C (and C++) way: just put the
letter {\tt 'L'} after any string constant and it becomes a {\it long}
constant, i.e. a wide character one. To make things a bit more readable, you
are also allowed to prefix the constant with {\tt 'L'} instead of putting it
after it.

Finally, the standard C functions don't work with {\tt wchar\_t} strings, so
another set of functions exists which do the same thing but accept 
{\tt wchar\_t *} instead of {\tt char *}. For example, a function to get the
length of a wide-character string is called {\tt wcslen()} (compare with 
{\tt strlen()} - you see that the only difference is that the "str" prefix
standing for "string" has been replaced with "wcs" standing for
"wide-character string").

To summarize, here is a brief example of how a program which can be compiled
in both ANSI and Unicode modes could look like:

\begin{verbatim}
#ifdef __UNICODE__
    wchar_t wch = L'*';
    const wchar_t *ws = L"Hello, world!";
    int len = wcslen(ws);
#else // ANSI
    char ch = '*';
    const char *s = "Hello, world!";
    int len = strlen(s);
#endif // Unicode/ANSI
\end{verbatim}

Of course, it would be nearly impossibly to write such programs if it had to
be done this way (try to imagine the number of {\tt \#ifdef UNICODE} an average
program would have had!). Luckily, there is another way - see the next
section.

\subsection{Unicode support in wxWindows}

In wxWindows, the code fragment from above should be written instead:

\begin{verbatim}
    wxChar ch = wxT('*');
    wxString s = wxT("Hello, world!");
    int len = s.Len();
\end{verbatim}

What happens here? First of all, you see that there are no more {\tt \#ifdef}s
at all. Instead, we define some types and macros which behave differently in
the Unicode and ANSI builds and allows us to avoid using conditional
compilation in the program itself.

We have a {\tt wxChar} type which maps either on {\tt char} or {\tt wchar\_t} 
depending on the mode in which program is being compiled. There is no need for
a separate type for strings though, because the standard 
\helpref{wxString}{wxstring} supports Unicode, i.e. it stores either ANSI or
Unicode strings depending on the compile mode.

Finally, there is a special {\tt wxT()} macro which should enclose all literal
strings in the program. As it is easy to see comparing the last fragment with
the one above, this macro expands to nothing in the (usual) ANSI mode and
prefixes {\tt 'L'} to its argument in the Unicode mode.

The important conclusion is that if you use {\tt wxChar} instead of 
{\tt char}, avoid using C style strings and use {\tt wxString} instead and
don't forget to enclose all string literals inside {\tt wxT()} macro, your
program automatically becomes (almost) Unicode compliant!

Just let us state once again the rules:

\begin{itemize}
\item Always use {\tt wxChar} instead of {\tt char}
\item Always enclose literal string constants in {\tt wxT()} macro unless
they're already converted to the right representation (another standard
wxWindows macro {\tt \_()} does it, so there is no need for {\tt wxT()} in this
case) or you intend to pass the constant directly to an external function
which doesn't accept wide-character strings.
\item Use {\tt wxString} instead of C style strings.
\end{itemize}

\subsection{Unicode and the outside world}

We have seen that it was easy to write Unicode programs using wxWindows types
and macros, but it has been also mentioned that it isn't quite enough.
Although everything works fine inside the program, things can get nasty when
it tries to communicate with the outside world which, sadly, often expects
ANSI strings (a notable exception is the entire Win32 API which accepts either
Unicode or ANSI strings and which thus makes it unnecessary to ever perform
any conversions in the program).

To get a ANSI string from a wxString, you may use the 
mb\_str() function which always returns an ANSI
string (independently of the mode - while the usual 
\helpref{c\_str()}{wxstringcstr} returns a pointer to the internal
representation which is either ASCII or Unicode). More rarely used, but still
useful, is wc\_str() function which always returns
the Unicode string.

% TODO describe fn_str(), wx_str(), wxCharBuf classes, ...

\subsection{Unicode-related compilation settings}

You should define {\tt wxUSE\_UNICODE} to $1$ to compile your program in
Unicode mode. Note that it currently only works in Win32 and that some parts of
wxWindows are not Unicode-compliant yet (ODBC classes, for example). If you
compile your program in ANSI mode you can still define {\tt wxUSE\_WCHAR\_T} 
to get some limited support for {\tt wchar\_t} type.

This will allow your program to perform conversions between Unicode strings and
ANSI ones (\helpref{wxEncodingConverter}{wxencodingconverter} depends on this
partially) and construct wxString objects from Unicode strings (presumably read
from some external file or elsewhere).