* src/print.c (print_state): Here.
* tests/conflicts.at, tests/existing.at, tests/local.at, tests/reduce.at,
tests/regression.at, tests/sets.at: Adjust.
print_state (FILE *out, state *s)
{
fputs ("\n\n", out);
- fprintf (out, _("state %d"), s->number);
+ fprintf (out, _("State %d"), s->number);
fputc ('\n', out);
print_core (out, s);
print_actions (out, s);
on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
-state 0
+State 0
0 $accept: . exp $end
1 exp: . exp OP exp
exp go to state 2
-state 1
+State 1
2 exp: NUM .
$default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
-state 2
+State 2
0 $accept: exp . $end
1 exp: exp . OP exp
OP shift, and go to state 4
-state 3
+State 3
0 $accept: exp $end .
$default accept
-state 4
+State 4
1 exp: . exp OP exp
1 | exp OP . exp
exp go to state 5
-state 5
+State 5
1 exp: exp . OP exp
1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
-state 0
+State 0
0 $accept: . exp $end
1 exp: . exp OP exp
exp go to state 2
-state 1
+State 1
2 exp: NUM .
$default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
-state 2
+State 2
0 $accept: exp . $end
1 exp: exp . OP exp
OP shift, and go to state 4
-state 3
+State 3
0 $accept: exp $end .
$default accept
-state 4
+State 4
1 exp: . exp OP exp
1 | exp OP . exp
exp go to state 5
-state 5
+State 5
1 exp: exp . OP exp
1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
on left: 4, on right: 2
-state 0
+State 0
0 $accept: . exp $end
1 exp: . num
id go to state 4
-state 1
+State 1
3 num: '0' . [$end]
4 id: '0' . [$end]
$default reduce using rule 3 (num)
-state 2
+State 2
0 $accept: exp . $end
$end shift, and go to state 5
-state 3
+State 3
1 exp: num .
$default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
-state 4
+State 4
2 exp: id .
$default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
-state 5
+State 5
0 $accept: exp $end .
on left: 8 9 10, on right: 1
-state 0
+State 0
0 $accept: . start $end
1 start: . resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
Conflict between rule 3 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
-state 1
+State 1
0 $accept: start . $end
$end shift, and go to state 3
-state 2
+State 2
1 start: resolved_conflict . 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
'a' shift, and go to state 4
-state 3
+State 3
0 $accept: start $end .
$default accept
-state 4
+State 4
1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' . reported_conflicts 'a'
8 reported_conflicts: . 'a'
reported_conflicts go to state 6
-state 5
+State 5
8 reported_conflicts: 'a' . ['a']
9 | 'a' . ['a']
$default reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
-state 6
+State 6
1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts . 'a'
'a' shift, and go to state 7
-state 7
+State 7
1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' .
empty_c3: %prec 'd' ;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
-AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^state 0$/,/^state 1$/p']], 0,
-[[state 0
+AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
+[[State 0
0 $accept: . start $end
1 start: . 'a'
Conflict between rule 13 and token 'c' resolved as reduce ('c' < 'd').
-state 1
+State 1
]])
AT_CLEANUP
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
-AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^state 0$/,/^state 1$/p']], 0,
-[[state 0
+AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
+[[State 0
0 $accept: . start $end
1 start: . 'a'
Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'c').
-state 1
+State 1
]])
AT_CLEANUP
$default reduce using rule 45 (statement)
+
+
-+state 320
++State 320
+
+ 139 non_post_simp_exp: . '!' simp_exp
+ 140 | . '(' exp r_paren
+ variable go to state 63
+
+
-+state 321
++State 321
+
+ 146 non_post_simp_exp: INCREMENT . variable
+ 154 variable: . NAME
+ variable go to state 50
+
+
-+state 322
++State 322
+
+ 147 non_post_simp_exp: DECREMENT . variable
+ 154 variable: . NAME
+ variable go to state 51
+
+
-+state 323
++State 323
+
+ 130 simp_exp: . non_post_simp_exp
+ 131 | . simp_exp '^' simp_exp
+ variable go to state 57
+
+
-+state 324
++State 324
+
+ 130 simp_exp: . non_post_simp_exp
+ 131 | . simp_exp '^' simp_exp
+ variable go to state 57
+
+
-+state 325
++State 325
+
+ 130 simp_exp: . non_post_simp_exp
+ 131 | . simp_exp '^' simp_exp
+ variable go to state 57
+
+
-+state 326
++State 326
+
+ 131 simp_exp: simp_exp . '^' simp_exp
+ 132 | simp_exp . '*' simp_exp
+ Conflict between rule 151 and token '-' resolved as reduce ('-' < UNARY).
+
+
-+state 327
++State 327
+
+ 131 simp_exp: simp_exp . '^' simp_exp
+ 132 | simp_exp . '*' simp_exp
+ Conflict between rule 150 and token '-' resolved as reduce ('-' < UNARY).
+
+
-+state 328
++State 328
+
+ 131 simp_exp: simp_exp . '^' simp_exp
+ 132 | simp_exp . '*' simp_exp
nth_primitive go to state 105
@@ -3256,7 +3256,7 @@
- state 102
+ State 102
- 146 place: label . [$end, LABEL, VARIABLE, NUMBER, TEXT, ORDINAL, LEFT_ARROW_HEAD, RIGHT_ARROW_HEAD, DOUBLE_ARROW_HEAD, LAST, UP, DOWN, LEFT, RIGHT, HEIGHT, RADIUS, WIDTH, DIAMETER, FROM, TO, AT, WITH, BY, THEN, SOLID, DOTTED, DASHED, CHOP, SAME, INVISIBLE, LJUST, RJUST, ABOVE, BELOW, AND, HERE, DOT_X, DOT_Y, DOT_HT, DOT_WID, DOT_RAD, SIN, COS, ATAN2, LOG, EXP, SQRT, K_MAX, K_MIN, INT, RAND, SRAND, CW, CCW, THICKNESS, FILL, COLORED, OUTLINED, SHADED, ALIGNED, SPRINTF, '(', '`', ',', '>', '+', '-', '!', ';', '}', '@:>@', ')']
+ 146 place: label . [$end, LABEL, VARIABLE, NUMBER, TEXT, ORDINAL, LEFT_ARROW_HEAD, RIGHT_ARROW_HEAD, DOUBLE_ARROW_HEAD, LAST, UP, DOWN, LEFT, RIGHT, HEIGHT, RADIUS, WIDTH, DIAMETER, FROM, TO, AT, WITH, BY, THEN, SOLID, DOTTED, DASHED, CHOP, SAME, INVISIBLE, LJUST, RJUST, ABOVE, BELOW, HERE, DOT_X, DOT_Y, DOT_HT, DOT_WID, DOT_RAD, SIN, COS, ATAN2, LOG, EXP, SQRT, K_MAX, K_MIN, INT, RAND, SRAND, CW, CCW, THICKNESS, FILL, COLORED, OUTLINED, SHADED, ALIGNED, SPRINTF, '(', '`', '+', '-', '!', ';', '}', '@:>@']
+ expr go to state 424
- state 165
+ State 165
@@ -7987,7 +7987,7 @@
text_expr go to state 112
text go to state 113
+ between go to state 425
- state 193
+ State 193
@@ -10152,7 +10152,7 @@
expr_pair go to state 317
+ expr go to state 424
- state 238
+ State 238
@@ -12937,7 +12937,7 @@
'!' shift, and go to state 94
+ expr go to state 424
- state 315
+ State 315
@@ -16124,7 +16124,7 @@
$default reduce using rule 239 (expr)
+ expr go to state 424
- state 383
+ State 383
@@ -18071,7 +18071,7 @@
'!' shift, and go to state 94
$default reduce using rule 29 (placeless_element)
+
+
-+state 423
++State 423
+
+ 146 place: label . [$end, AND, DOT_X, DOT_Y, DOT_HT, DOT_WID, DOT_RAD, ',', '>', '+', '-', ';', '}', '@:>@', ')']
+ 147 | label . corner
+ corner go to state 205
+
+
-+state 424
++State 424
+
+ 140 position_not_place: expr . between position AND position
+ 141 | expr . '<' position ',' position '>'
+ between go to state 425
+
+
-+state 425
++State 425
+
+ 134 position: . position_not_place
+ 135 | . place
+ expr go to state 424
+
+
-+state 426
++State 426
+
+ 137 position_not_place: position . '+' expr_pair
+ 138 | position . '-' expr_pair
+ '-' shift, and go to state 198
+
+
-+state 427
++State 427
+
+ 134 position: . position_not_place
+ 135 | . place
[0], [], m4_dquote($7))
m4_if(m4_index(m4_quote($3), [last-state]), -1,
- [AT_CHECK([[sed -n '/^state 0$/,$p' input.output]], [[0]],
+ [AT_CHECK([[sed -n '/^State 0$/,$p' input.output]], [[0]],
m4_dquote($8))],
- [AT_CHECK([[sed -n 's/^state //p' input.output | tail -1]], [[0]],
+ [AT_CHECK([[sed -n 's/^State //p' input.output | tail -1]], [[0]],
m4_dquote($8)[[
]])])
[],
dnl TABLES
-[[state 0
+[[State 0
0 $accept: . S $end
1 S: . 'a' A 'a'
S go to state 4
-state 1
+State 1
1 S: 'a' . A 'a'
4 A: . 'a' 'a'
A go to state 6
-state 2
+State 2
2 S: 'b' . A 'b'
4 A: . 'a' 'a'
A go to state 7
-state 3
+State 3
3 S: 'c' . c
4 A: . 'a' 'a'
c go to state 10
-state 4
+State 4
0 $accept: S . $end
$end shift, and go to state 11
-state 5
+State 5
4 A: 'a' . 'a'
5 | 'a' . ]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[['a', 'b']]], [[['a']]])[
Conflict between rule 5 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
-state 6
+State 6
1 S: 'a' A . 'a'
'a' shift, and go to state 13
-state 7
+State 7
2 S: 'b' A . 'b'
'b' shift, and go to state 14
-state 8
+State 8
4 A: 'a' . 'a'
5 | 'a' . [$end]
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 5 (A)
-state 9
+State 9
7 c: A .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 7 (c)
-state 10
+State 10
3 S: 'c' c .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 3 (S)
-state 11
+State 11
0 $accept: S $end .
$default accept
-state 12
+State 12
4 A: 'a' 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ ['a']]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 4 (A)
-state 13
+State 13
1 S: 'a' A 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 1 (S)
-state 14
+State 14
2 S: 'b' A 'b' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 2 (S)
-state 15
+State 15
6 c: 'a' 'b' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[]], [[
-state 16
+State 16
4 A: 'a' . 'a'
5 | 'a' . ['b']
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 5 (A)]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[
-state 17
+State 17
4 A: 'a' 'a' . [$end]
$end reduce using rule 4 (A)
-state 18
+State 18
4 A: 'a' 'a' . ['b']
[],
dnl TABLES
-[[state 0
+[[State 0
0 $accept: . S $end
1 S: . 'a' A 'a'
S go to state 4
-state 1
+State 1
1 S: 'a' . A 'a'
4 A: . 'a' 'a' 'a'
A go to state 6
-state 2
+State 2
2 S: 'b' . A 'b'
4 A: . 'a' 'a' 'a'
A go to state 7
-state 3
+State 3
3 S: 'c' . c
4 A: . 'a' 'a' 'a'
c go to state 10
-state 4
+State 4
0 $accept: S . $end
$end shift, and go to state 11
-state 5
+State 5
4 A: 'a' . 'a' 'a'
5 | 'a' . 'a'
'a' shift, and go to state 12
-state 6
+State 6
1 S: 'a' A . 'a'
'a' shift, and go to state 13
-state 7
+State 7
2 S: 'b' A . 'b'
'b' shift, and go to state 14
-state 8
+State 8
4 A: 'a' . 'a' 'a'
5 | 'a' . 'a'
'a' shift, and go to state 15
-state 9
+State 9
7 c: A .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 7 (c)
-state 10
+State 10
3 S: 'c' c .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 3 (S)
-state 11
+State 11
0 $accept: S $end .
$default accept
-state 12
+State 12
4 A: 'a' 'a' . 'a'
5 | 'a' 'a' . ]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[['a', 'b']]], [[['a']]])[
Conflict between rule 5 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
-state 13
+State 13
1 S: 'a' A 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 1 (S)
-state 14
+State 14
2 S: 'b' A 'b' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 2 (S)
-state 15
+State 15
4 A: 'a' 'a' . 'a'
5 | 'a' 'a' . [$end]
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 5 (A)
-state 16
+State 16
4 A: 'a' 'a' 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ ['a']]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 4 (A)
-state 17
+State 17
6 c: 'a' 'a' 'b' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[]], [[
-state 18
+State 18
4 A: 'a' . 'a' 'a'
5 | 'a' . 'a'
[[19]])[
-state 19]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[
+State 19]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[
4 A: 'a' 'a' 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 4 (A)
-state 20]])[
+State 20]])[
4 A: 'a' 'a' . 'a'
5 | 'a' 'a' . ['b']
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 5 (A)]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[
-state 21
+State 21
4 A: 'a' 'a' 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ ['b']]])[
[],
dnl TABLES
-[[state 0
+[[State 0
0 $accept: . S $end
1 S: . 'a' A 'a'
S go to state 4
-state 1
+State 1
1 S: 'a' . A 'a'
4 A: . 'a' 'a' B
A go to state 6
-state 2
+State 2
2 S: 'b' . A 'b'
4 A: . 'a' 'a' B
A go to state 7
-state 3
+State 3
3 S: 'c' . c
4 A: . 'a' 'a' B
c go to state 10
-state 4
+State 4
0 $accept: S . $end
$end shift, and go to state 11
-state 5
+State 5
4 A: 'a' . 'a' B
'a' shift, and go to state 12
-state 6
+State 6
1 S: 'a' A . 'a'
'a' shift, and go to state 13
-state 7
+State 7
2 S: 'b' A . 'b'
'b' shift, and go to state 14
-state 8
+State 8
4 A: 'a' . 'a' B
7 c: 'a' . 'a' 'b'
'a' shift, and go to state 15
-state 9
+State 9
8 c: A .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 8 (c)
-state 10
+State 10
3 S: 'c' c .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 3 (S)
-state 11
+State 11
0 $accept: S $end .
$default accept
-state 12
+State 12
4 A: 'a' 'a' . B
5 B: . 'a'
Conflict between rule 6 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
-state 13
+State 13
1 S: 'a' A 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 1 (S)
-state 14
+State 14
2 S: 'b' A 'b' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 2 (S)
-state 15
+State 15
4 A: 'a' 'a' . B
5 B: . 'a'
B go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[21]], [[17]])[
-state 16
+State 16
5 B: 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ ['a']]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 5 (B)
-state 17
+State 17
4 A: 'a' 'a' B .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ ['a']]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 4 (A)
-state 18
+State 18
7 c: 'a' 'a' 'b' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 7 (c)]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [], [[
-state 19
+State 19
4 A: 'a' . 'a' B
[[20]])[
-state 20]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[
+State 20]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[
5 B: 'a' . [$end]
$end reduce using rule 5 (B)
-state 21
+State 21
4 A: 'a' 'a' B . [$end]
$end reduce using rule 4 (A)
-state 22]])[
+State 22]])[
4 A: 'a' 'a' . B
5 B: . 'a'
B go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[24
-state 23
+State 23
5 B: 'a' . ['b']
'b' reduce using rule 5 (B)
-state 24
+State 24
4 A: 'a' 'a' B . ['b']
]], [])],
dnl TABLES
-[[state 0
+[[State 0
0 $accept: . S $end
1 S: . 'a' A 'f'
S go to state 4
-state 1
+State 1
1 S: 'a' . A 'f'
2 | 'a' . B
B go to state 7
-state 2
+State 2
3 S: 'b' . A 'f'
4 | 'b' . B 'g'
B go to state 10
-state 3
+State 3
6 S: 'c' . 'c' A 'g'
7 | 'c' . 'c' B
'c' shift, and go to state 11
-state 4
+State 4
0 $accept: S . $end
$end shift, and go to state 12
-state 5
+State 5
8 A: 'd' . 'e'
9 B: 'd' . 'e'
[[20]])[
-state 6
+State 6
1 S: 'a' A . 'f'
'f' shift, and go to state 14
-state 7
+State 7
2 S: 'a' B .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 2 (S)
-state 8
+State 8
5 S: 'b' 'd' . [$end]
8 A: 'd' . 'e'
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 5 (S)
-state 9
+State 9
3 S: 'b' A . 'f'
'f' shift, and go to state 15
-state 10
+State 10
4 S: 'b' B . 'g'
'g' shift, and go to state 16
-state 11
+State 11
6 S: 'c' 'c' . A 'g'
7 | 'c' 'c' . B
B go to state 18
-state 12
+State 12
0 $accept: S $end .
$default accept]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[
-state 13
+State 13
8 A: 'd' 'e' . ['f', 'g']
9 B: 'd' 'e' . [$end, 'g']
$default reduce using rule 8 (A)]], [[
-state 13
+State 13
8 A: 'd' 'e' . ['f']
9 B: 'd' 'e' . ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[[$end]]], [[['g']]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 8 (A)]])[
-state 14
+State 14
1 S: 'a' A 'f' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 1 (S)
-state 15
+State 15
3 S: 'b' A 'f' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 3 (S)
-state 16
+State 16
4 S: 'b' B 'g' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 4 (S)
-state 17
+State 17
6 S: 'c' 'c' A . 'g'
'g' shift, and go to state 19
-state 18
+State 18
7 S: 'c' 'c' B .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[$default]])[ reduce using rule 7 (S)
-state 19
+State 19
6 S: 'c' 'c' A 'g' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
[[]], [[
-state 20]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[
+State 20]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[
8 A: 'd' 'e' . ['f']
9 B: 'd' 'e' . ['g']
'g' reduce using rule 9 (B)
-state 21
+State 21
8 A: 'd' . 'e'
9 B: 'd' . 'e'
'e' shift, and go to state 22
-state 22
+State 22
8 A: 'd' 'e' . ['g']
9 B: 'd' 'e' . [$end]
]],
dnl Visit each state mentioned above.
[['a', 'a']],
-[[state 0
+[[State 0
0 $accept: . start $end
1 start: . a b
a go to state 3
-state 1
+State 1
4 a: 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[accepting]], [[ [$end, 'a', 'b']
$default reduce using rule 4 (a)]])[
-state 2
+State 2
0 $accept: start . $end
$end shift, and go to state 4
-state 3
+State 3
1 start: a . b
2 | a . b 'a'
c go to state 6
-state 4
+State 4
0 $accept: start $end .
$default accept
-state 5
+State 5
1 start: a b . [$end]
2 | a b . 'a'
[[$end]])[ reduce using rule 1 (start)
-state 6
+State 6
3 start: a c . 'b'
'b' shift, and go to state 8
-state 7
+State 7
2 start: a b 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[accepting]], [[ [$end]
$default reduce using rule 2 (start)]])[
-state 8
+State 8
3 start: a c 'b' .]AT_COND_CASE([[accepting]], [[ [$end]
on left: 3, on right: 4
-state 0
+State 0
0 $accept: . expr $end
$@2 go to state 3
-state 1
+State 1
2 expr: 'a' . $@1 'b'
$@1 go to state 4
-state 2
+State 2
0 $accept: expr . $end
$end shift, and go to state 5
-state 3
+State 3
4 expr: $@2 . 'c'
'c' shift, and go to state 6
-state 4
+State 4
2 expr: 'a' $@1 . 'b'
'b' shift, and go to state 7
-state 5
+State 5
0 $accept: expr $end .
$default accept
-state 6
+State 6
4 expr: $@2 'c' .
$default reduce using rule 4 (expr)
-state 7
+State 7
2 expr: 'a' $@1 'b' .
on left: 4, on right: 5
-state 0
+State 0
0 $accept: . CONST_DEC_PART $end
$@1 go to state 4
-state 1
+State 1
0 $accept: CONST_DEC_PART . $end
$end shift, and go to state 5
-state 2
+State 2
1 CONST_DEC_PART: CONST_DEC_LIST .
3 CONST_DEC_LIST: CONST_DEC_LIST . CONST_DEC
$@1 go to state 4
-state 3
+State 3
2 CONST_DEC_LIST: CONST_DEC .
$default reduce using rule 2 (CONST_DEC_LIST)
-state 4
+State 4
5 CONST_DEC: $@1 . undef_id_tok '=' const_id_tok ';'
undef_id_tok shift, and go to state 7
-state 5
+State 5
0 $accept: CONST_DEC_PART $end .
$default accept
-state 6
+State 6
3 CONST_DEC_LIST: CONST_DEC_LIST CONST_DEC .
$default reduce using rule 3 (CONST_DEC_LIST)
-state 7
+State 7
5 CONST_DEC: $@1 undef_id_tok . '=' const_id_tok ';'
'=' shift, and go to state 8
-state 8
+State 8
5 CONST_DEC: $@1 undef_id_tok '=' . const_id_tok ';'
const_id_tok shift, and go to state 9
-state 9
+State 9
5 CONST_DEC: $@1 undef_id_tok '=' const_id_tok . ';'
';' shift, and go to state 10
-state 10
+State 10
5 CONST_DEC: $@1 undef_id_tok '=' const_id_tok ';' .
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all input.y]])
-AT_CHECK([[sed -n '/^state 1$/,/^state 2$/p' input.output]], [[0]],
-[[state 1
+AT_CHECK([[sed -n '/^State 1$/,/^State 2$/p' input.output]], [[0]],
+[[State 1
2 start: 'a' . a 'a'
3 a: . 'a'
a go to state 5
-state 2
+State 2
]])
AT_CLEANUP
# Get the final state in the report, from the "accept" action..
AT_CHECK([sed -n '
- /^state \(.*\)/{
+ /^State \(.*\)/{
s//final state \1/
x
}
projects / bison.git / commitdiff
