the sr conflicts instead of the lookahead number that points to
that rule.
(flush_reduce): Accept the current lookahead vector as argument,
instead of the index in LA.
(resolve_sr_conflict): Accept the current number of lookahead
bitset to consider for the STATE, instead of the index in LA.
(set_conflicts): Adjust.
* src/lalr.c, src/lalr.h, src/state.h: Comment changes.
+2002-06-15 Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
+
+ * src/conflicts.c (log_resolution): Accept the rule involved in
+ the sr conflicts instead of the lookahead number that points to
+ that rule.
+ (flush_reduce): Accept the current lookahead vector as argument,
+ instead of the index in LA.
+ (resolve_sr_conflict): Accept the current number of lookahead
+ bitset to consider for the STATE, instead of the index in LA.
+ (set_conflicts): Adjust.
+ * src/lalr.c, src/lalr.h, src/state.h: Comment changes.
+
+
2002-06-15 Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
* src/state.h (state_t): Replace the `lookaheadsp' member, a
2002-06-15 Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
* src/state.h (state_t): Replace the `lookaheadsp' member, a
+/*----------------------------------------------------------------.
+| Explain how an SR conflict between TOKEN and RULE was resolved: |
+| RESOLUTION. |
+`----------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
-log_resolution (int lookahead, int token,
+log_resolution (rule_t *rule, int token,
enum conflict_resolution_e resolution)
{
if (report_flag & report_solved_conflicts)
enum conflict_resolution_e resolution)
{
if (report_flag & report_solved_conflicts)
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
_("\
Conflict between rule %d and token %s resolved as shift"),
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
_("\
Conflict between rule %d and token %s resolved as shift"),
- LArule[lookahead]->number,
symbols[token]->tag);
break;
case reduce_resolution:
symbols[token]->tag);
break;
case reduce_resolution:
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
_("\
Conflict between rule %d and token %s resolved as reduce"),
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
_("\
Conflict between rule %d and token %s resolved as reduce"),
- LArule[lookahead]->number,
symbols[token]->tag);
break;
case nonassoc_resolution:
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
_("\
Conflict between rule %d and token %s resolved as an error"),
symbols[token]->tag);
break;
case nonassoc_resolution:
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
_("\
Conflict between rule %d and token %s resolved as an error"),
- LArule[lookahead]->number,
symbols[token]->tag);
break;
}
symbols[token]->tag);
break;
}
case shift_resolution:
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
" (%s < %s)",
case shift_resolution:
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
" (%s < %s)",
- LArule[lookahead]->prec->tag,
symbols[token]->tag);
break;
symbols[token]->tag);
break;
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
" (%s < %s)",
symbols[token]->tag,
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
" (%s < %s)",
symbols[token]->tag,
- LArule[lookahead]->prec->tag);
break;
case left_resolution:
break;
case left_resolution:
`-------------------------------------------------------------------*/
static void
`-------------------------------------------------------------------*/
static void
-flush_reduce (int lookahead, int token)
+flush_reduce (bitset lookaheads, int token)
- bitset_reset (LA[lookahead], token);
+ bitset_reset (lookaheads, token);
| precedence declarations. It has already been checked that the |
| rule has a precedence. A conflict is resolved by modifying the |
| shift or reduce tables so that there is no longer a conflict. |
| precedence declarations. It has already been checked that the |
| rule has a precedence. A conflict is resolved by modifying the |
| shift or reduce tables so that there is no longer a conflict. |
+| |
+| LOOKAHEAD is the number of the lookahead bitset to consider. |
`------------------------------------------------------------------*/
static void
resolve_sr_conflict (state_t *state, int lookahead)
{
int i;
`------------------------------------------------------------------*/
static void
resolve_sr_conflict (state_t *state, int lookahead)
{
int i;
- /* find the rule to reduce by to get precedence of reduction */
- int redprec = LArule[lookahead]->prec->prec;
+ /* Find the rule to reduce by to get precedence of reduction. */
+ rule_t *redrule = state->lookaheads_rule[lookahead];
+ int redprec = redrule->prec->prec;
+ bitset lookaheads = state->lookaheads[lookahead];
errs *errp = errs_new (ntokens + 1);
errp->nerrs = 0;
for (i = 0; i < ntokens; i++)
errs *errp = errs_new (ntokens + 1);
errp->nerrs = 0;
for (i = 0; i < ntokens; i++)
- if (bitset_test (LA[lookahead], i)
+ if (bitset_test (lookaheads, i)
&& bitset_test (lookaheadset, i)
&& symbols[i]->prec)
{
&& bitset_test (lookaheadset, i)
&& symbols[i]->prec)
{
The precedence of shifting is that of token i. */
if (symbols[i]->prec < redprec)
{
The precedence of shifting is that of token i. */
if (symbols[i]->prec < redprec)
{
- log_resolution (lookahead, i, reduce_resolution);
+ log_resolution (redrule, i, reduce_resolution);
flush_shift (state, i);
}
else if (symbols[i]->prec > redprec)
{
flush_shift (state, i);
}
else if (symbols[i]->prec > redprec)
{
- log_resolution (lookahead, i, shift_resolution);
- flush_reduce (lookahead, i);
+ log_resolution (redrule, i, shift_resolution);
+ flush_reduce (lookaheads, i);
}
else
/* Matching precedence levels.
}
else
/* Matching precedence levels.
switch (symbols[i]->assoc)
{
case right_assoc:
switch (symbols[i]->assoc)
{
case right_assoc:
- log_resolution (lookahead, i, right_resolution);
- flush_reduce (lookahead, i);
+ log_resolution (redrule, i, right_resolution);
+ flush_reduce (lookaheads, i);
- log_resolution (lookahead, i, left_resolution);
+ log_resolution (redrule, i, left_resolution);
flush_shift (state, i);
break;
case non_assoc:
flush_shift (state, i);
break;
case non_assoc:
- log_resolution (lookahead, i, nonassoc_resolution);
+ log_resolution (redrule, i, nonassoc_resolution);
- flush_reduce (lookahead, i);
+ flush_reduce (lookaheads, i);
/* Record an explicit error for this token. */
errp->errs[errp->nerrs++] = i;
break;
/* Record an explicit error for this token. */
errp->errs[errp->nerrs++] = i;
break;
/* Loop over all rules which require lookahead in this state. First
check for shift-reduce conflict, and try to resolve using
/* Loop over all rules which require lookahead in this state. First
check for shift-reduce conflict, and try to resolve using
for (i = 0; i < state->nlookaheads; ++i)
if (state->lookaheads_rule[i]->prec
&& state->lookaheads_rule[i]->prec->prec
&& !bitset_disjoint_p (state->lookaheads[i], lookaheadset))
{
for (i = 0; i < state->nlookaheads; ++i)
if (state->lookaheads_rule[i]->prec
&& state->lookaheads_rule[i]->prec->prec
&& !bitset_disjoint_p (state->lookaheads[i], lookaheadset))
{
- resolve_sr_conflict (state, (state->lookaheads - LA) + i);
+ resolve_sr_conflict (state, i);
bitsetv pLA = LA;
rule_t **pLArule = LArule;
bitsetv pLA = LA;
rule_t **pLArule = LArule;
- /* Count the number of lookaheads required for each state
- (NLOOKAHEADS member). */
+ /* Initialize the members LOOKAHEADS and LOOKAHEADS_RULE for each
+ state. */
for (i = 0; i < nstates; i++)
{
states[i]->lookaheads = pLA;
for (i = 0; i < nstates; i++)
{
states[i]->lookaheads = pLA;
-/* LA is a lr by ntokens matrix of bits. LA[l, i] is 1 if the rule
+/* LA is a LR by NTOKENS matrix of bits. LA[l, i] is 1 if the rule
LAruleno[l] is applicable in the appropriate state when the next
token is symbol i. If LA[l, i] and LA[l, j] are both 1 for i != j,
it is a conflict. */
LAruleno[l] is applicable in the appropriate state when the next
token is symbol i. If LA[l, i] and LA[l, j] are both 1 for i != j,
it is a conflict. */
state. These symbols at these items are the allowable inputs that
can follow now.
state. These symbols at these items are the allowable inputs that
can follow now.
- A core represents one state. States are numbered in the number
+ A core represents one state. States are numbered in the NUMBER
field. When generate_states is finished, the starting state is
field. When generate_states is finished, the starting state is
- state 0 and nstates is the number of states. (A transition to a
- state whose state number is nstates indicates termination.) All
- the cores are chained together and first_state points to the first
- one (state 0).
+ state 0 and NSTATES is the number of states. (FIXME: This sentence
+ is no longer true: A transition to a state whose state number is
+ NSTATES indicates termination.) All the cores are chained together
+ and FIRST_STATE points to the first one (state 0).
For each state there is a particular symbol which must have been
the last thing accepted to reach that state. It is the
For each state there is a particular symbol which must have been
the last thing accepted to reach that state. It is the
- accessing_symbol of the core.
+ ACCESSING_SYMBOL of the core.
Each core contains a vector of NITEMS items which are the indices
Each core contains a vector of NITEMS items which are the indices
- in the ritems vector of the items that are selected in this state.
+ in the RITEMS vector of the items that are selected in this state.
The link field is used for chaining symbols that hash states by
their itemsets. This is for recognizing equivalent states and
The link field is used for chaining symbols that hash states by
their itemsets. This is for recognizing equivalent states and