+2011-01-09 Joel E. Denny <joeldenny@joeldenny.org>
+
+ Improve error messages for `$' or `@' followed by `.' or `-'.
+ Previously, for this special case of an invalid reference, the
+ usual "symbol not found in production:" was printed. However,
+ because the symbol name was parsed as the empty string, that
+ message was followed immediately by a newline instead of a symbol
+ name. In reality, this is a syntax error, so the reference is
+ invalid regardless of the symbols actually appearing in the
+ production. Discussed at
+ <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2011-01/msg00012.html>.
+ * src/scan-code.l (parse_ref): Report the above case as a syntax
+ error. Other than that, continue to handle this case like any
+ other invalid reference that Bison manages to parse because
+ "possibly meant" messages can still be helpful to the user.
+ * tests/named-refs.at ($ or @ followed by . or -): New test group.
+
2011-01-08 Joel E. Denny <joeldenny@joeldenny.org>
doc: don't use @acronym.
complain_at_indent (text_loc, &indent, _("invalid reference: %s"),
quote (text));
indent += SUB_INDENT;
- if (midrule_rhs_index)
+ if (len == 0)
+ {
+ location sym_loc = text_loc;
+ sym_loc.start.column += 1;
+ sym_loc.end = sym_loc.start;
+ const char *format =
+ _("syntax error after `%c', expecting integer, letter,"
+ " `_', `[', or `$'");
+ complain_at_indent (sym_loc, &indent, format, dollar_or_at);
+ }
+ else if (midrule_rhs_index)
{
const char *format =
_("symbol not found in production before $%d: %.*s");
test.y:54.1-57.21: symbol not found in production: sym
]])
AT_CLEANUP
+
+#######################################################################
+
+AT_SETUP([[$ or @ followed by . or -]])
+AT_DATA([[test.y]],
+[[
+%%
+start:
+ .field { $.field; }
+| -field { @-field; }
+| 'a' { @.field; }
+| 'a' { $-field; }
+;
+.field: ;
+-field: ;
+]])
+AT_BISON_CHECK([[test.y]], [[1]], [],
+[[test.y:4.12-18: invalid reference: `$.field'
+test.y:4.13: syntax error after `$', expecting integer, letter, `_', `@<:@', or `$'
+test.y:4.3-8: possibly meant: $[.field] at $1
+test.y:5.12-18: invalid reference: `@-field'
+test.y:5.13: syntax error after `@', expecting integer, letter, `_', `@<:@', or `$'
+test.y:5.3-8: possibly meant: @[-field] at $1
+test.y:6.12-18: invalid reference: `@.field'
+test.y:6.13: syntax error after `@', expecting integer, letter, `_', `@<:@', or `$'
+test.y:7.12-18: invalid reference: `$-field'
+test.y:7.13: syntax error after `$', expecting integer, letter, `_', `@<:@', or `$'
+]])
+AT_CLEANUP