* tests/regression.at (Token definitions): Don't rely on

AT_PARSER_CHECK for data that contains backslashes.  It currently
uses 'echo', and 'echo' isn't portable if its argument contains
backslashes.  Problem found on OpenBSD 3.4.  Also, do not assume
that the byte '\0xff' is not printable in the C locale; it is,
under OpenBSD 3.4 (!).  Luckily, '\0x80' through '\0x9e' are
not printable, so use '\0x81' to test.

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 30d4ba545e5e9360fc288dae094725acccfe9176..17e3f213b3736e75361beede7096e5a9791f570e 100644 (file)
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -2,6 +2,14 @@
 
        * NEWS: Version 2.0b.
 
+       * tests/regression.at (Token definitions): Don't rely on
+       AT_PARSER_CHECK for data that contains backslashes.  It currently
+       uses 'echo', and 'echo' isn't portable if its argument contains
+       backslashes.  Problem found on OpenBSD 3.4.  Also, do not assume
+       that the byte '\0xff' is not printable in the C locale; it is,
+       under OpenBSD 3.4 (!).  Luckily, '\0x80' through '\0x9e' are
+       not printable, so use '\0x81' to test.
+
        * data/glr.c (YYOPTIONAL_LOC): Define even if it's not a recent
        version of GCC, since the macro is used with non-GCC compilers.
 

diff --git a/tests/regression.at b/tests/regression.at
index de62cdcc4022704cbb23ec9bb7332eb601c3a55e..eb85f290053fbdbfc9161a6f6a7e483ebc31bab3 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/regression.at
+++ b/tests/regression.at
@@ -345,9 +345,9 @@ int yylex (void);
 %token B_TOKEN "b"
 %token C_TOKEN 'c'
 %token 'd' D_TOKEN
-%token SPECIAL "\\\'\?\"\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\001\377\x001\x0000ff??!"
+%token SPECIAL "\\\'\?\"\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\001\201\x001\x000081??!"
 %%
-exp: "a" "\\\'\?\"\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\001\377\x001\x0000ff??!";
+exp: "a" "\\\'\?\"\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\001\201\x001\x000081??!";
 %%
 void
 yyerror (char const *s)
@@ -370,9 +370,10 @@ main (void)
 
 AT_CHECK([bison -o input.c input.y])
 AT_COMPILE([input])
-AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input], 1, [],
-[syntax error, unexpected "\\'?\"\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\001\377\001\377?\?!", expecting a
-])
+AT_DATA([experr],
+[[syntax error, unexpected "\\'?\"\a\b\f\n\r\t\v\001\201\001\201?\?!", expecting a
+]])
+AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input], 1, [], [experr])
 AT_CLEANUP