* TODO (yychar == yyempty_): New.
* data/lalr1.cc: Remove the handling of this case.
This eases forthcoming changes related to yychar and yytranslate.
+2008-11-11 Akim Demaille <demaille@gostai.com>
+
+ yychar cannot be empty in yyerrlab.
+ * TODO (yychar == yyempty_): New.
+ * data/lalr1.cc: Remove the handling of this case.
+ This eases forthcoming changes related to yychar and yytranslate.
+
2008-11-11 Akim Demaille <demaille@gostai.com>
Bench: syntactic sugar for %define/#define.
return yyparse ();
}
+** yychar == yyempty_
+The code in yyerrlab reads:
+
+ if (yychar <= YYEOF)
+ {
+ /* Return failure if at end of input. */
+ if (yychar == YYEOF)
+ YYABORT;
+ }
+
+There are only two yychar that can be <= YYEOF: YYEMPTY and YYEOF.
+But I can't produce the situation where yychar is YYEMPTY here, is it
+really possible? The test suite does not exercise this case.
+
+This shows that it would be interesting to manage to install skeleton
+coverage analysis to the test suite.
* Header guards
if (yyerrstatus_ == 3)
{
/* If just tried and failed to reuse lookahead token after an
- error, discard it. */
-
- if (yychar <= yyeof_)
- {
- /* Return failure if at end of input. */
- if (yychar == yyeof_)
- YYABORT;
- }
- else
- {
- yy_destroy_ ("Error: discarding", yyla);
- yychar = yyempty_;
+ error, discard it. */
+
+ /* Return failure if at end of input. */
+ if (yychar == yyeof_)
+ YYABORT;
+ else
+ {]b4_assert_if([
+ // Previous version of this code was ready to handle
+ // yychar == yyempty_ (actually yychar <= yyeof_). Can it
+ // really be triggered?
+ assert (yychar != yyempty_);])[
+ yy_destroy_ ("Error: discarding", yyla);
+ yychar = yyempty_;
}
}