Declare to be of type suitable for the ninf value itself, not of
type suitable for the corresponding table, since the latter might
be unsigned but the ninf value might be negative. This fixes a
bug reported by Alexandre Duret-Lutz in
<http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bison/2003-04/msg00017.html>.
/* Tables. */
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_pact])[ pact_[];
/* Tables. */
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_pact])[ pact_[];
- static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_pact])[ pact_ninf_;
+ static const ]b4_int_type(b4_pact_ninf, b4_pact_ninf)[ pact_ninf_;
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_defact])[ defact_[];
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_pgoto])[ pgoto_[];
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_defgoto])[ defgoto_[];
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_table])[ table_[];
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_defact])[ defact_[];
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_pgoto])[ pgoto_[];
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_defgoto])[ defgoto_[];
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_table])[ table_[];
- static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_table])[ table_ninf_;
+ static const ]b4_int_type(b4_table_ninf, b4_table_ninf)[ table_ninf_;
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_check])[ check_[];
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_r1])[ r1_[];
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_r2])[ r2_[];
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_check])[ check_[];
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_r1])[ r1_[];
static const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_r2])[ r2_[];
/* YYPACT[STATE-NUM] -- Index in YYTABLE of the portion describing
STATE-NUM. */
/* YYPACT[STATE-NUM] -- Index in YYTABLE of the portion describing
STATE-NUM. */
-const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_pact]) yy::b4_parser_class_name::pact_ninf_ = b4_pact_ninf[;
+const ]b4_int_type(b4_pact_ninf, b4_pact_ninf) yy::b4_parser_class_name::pact_ninf_ = b4_pact_ninf[;
const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_pact])[
yy::]b4_parser_class_name[::pact_[] =
{
const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_pact])[
yy::]b4_parser_class_name[::pact_[] =
{
/* YYTABLE[YYPACT[STATE-NUM]]. What to do in state STATE-NUM. If
positive, shift that token. If negative, reduce the rule which
number is the opposite. If zero, do what YYDEFACT says. */
/* YYTABLE[YYPACT[STATE-NUM]]. What to do in state STATE-NUM. If
positive, shift that token. If negative, reduce the rule which
number is the opposite. If zero, do what YYDEFACT says. */
-const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_table]) yy::b4_parser_class_name::table_ninf_ = b4_table_ninf[;
+const ]b4_int_type(b4_table_ninf, b4_table_ninf) yy::b4_parser_class_name::table_ninf_ = b4_table_ninf[;
const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_table])[
yy::]b4_parser_class_name[::table_[] =
{
const ]b4_int_type_for([b4_table])[
yy::]b4_parser_class_name[::table_[] =
{