deterministic user-token-number redeclaration errors.

[bison.git] / tests / reduce.at

diff --git a/tests/reduce.at b/tests/reduce.at
index 6642f6540751e87c0e8e5cfd74752f9317267c93..0db3830b0f197413dcf928f5231bb8063c8b0c84 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/reduce.at
+++ b/tests/reduce.at
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ AT_TEST_LR_TYPE([[Single State Split]],
 [[%left 'a'
 // Conflict resolution renders state 12 unreachable for canonical LR(1).  We
 // keep it so that the paser table diff is easier to code.
-%define lr.keep_unreachable_states]],
+%define lr.keep-unreachable-states]],
 [[
 S: 'a' A 'a' /* rule 1 */
  | 'b' A 'b' /* rule 2 */
@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ AT_TEST_LR_TYPE([[Lane Split]],
 [[%left 'a'
 // Conflict resolution renders state 16 unreachable for canonical LR(1).  We
 // keep it so that the paser table diff is easier to code.
-%define lr.keep_unreachable_states]],
+%define lr.keep-unreachable-states]],
 [[
 /* Similar to the last test case set but two states must be split.  */
 S: 'a' A 'a' /* rule 1 */
@@ -873,7 +873,7 @@ AT_TEST_LR_TYPE([[Complex Lane Split]],
 [[%left 'a'
 // Conflict resolution renders state 16 unreachable for canonical LR(1).  We
 // keep it so that the paser table diff is easier to code.
-%define lr.keep_unreachable_states]],
+%define lr.keep-unreachable-states]],
 [[
 /* Similar to the last test case set but forseeing the S/R conflict from the
    first state that must be split is becoming difficult.  Imagine if B were
@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ dnl PARSER-EXIT-VALUE, PARSER-STDOUT, PARSER-STDERR
 ]])])
 
 AT_TEST_LR_TYPE([[Split During Added Lookahead Propagation]],
-[[%define lr.keep_unreachable_states]],
+[[%define lr.keep-unreachable-states]],
 [[
 /* The partial state chart diagram below is for LALR(1).  State 0 is the start
    state.  States are iterated for successor construction in numerical order.
@@ -1442,33 +1442,33 @@ dnl PARSER-EXIT-VALUE, PARSER-STDOUT, PARSER-STDERR
 
 
 
-## -------------------------- ##
-## %define lr.default_rules.  ##
-## -------------------------- ##
+## ------------------------------- ##
+## %define lr.default-reductions.  ##
+## ------------------------------- ##
 
-# AT_TEST_LR_DEFAULT_RULES(GRAMMAR, INPUT, TABLES)
-# ------------------------------------------------
-m4_define([AT_TEST_LR_DEFAULT_RULES],
+# AT_TEST_LR_DEFAULT_REDUCTIONS(GRAMMAR, INPUT, TABLES)
+# -----------------------------------------------------
+m4_define([AT_TEST_LR_DEFAULT_REDUCTIONS],
 [
-AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[no %define lr.default_rules]],
+AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[no %define lr.default-reductions]],
                          [[all]], [[]],
                          [[]],
                          [$1], [$2], [[]], [$3])
-AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[%define lr.default_rules "all"]],
+AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[%define lr.default-reductions "all"]],
                          [[all]], [[]],
-                         [[%define lr.default_rules "all"]],
+                         [[%define lr.default-reductions "all"]],
                          [$1], [$2], [[]], [$3])
-AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[%define lr.default_rules "consistent"]],
+AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[%define lr.default-reductions "consistent"]],
                          [[consistent]], [[]],
-                         [[%define lr.default_rules "consistent"]],
+                         [[%define lr.default-reductions "consistent"]],
                          [$1], [$2], [[]], [$3])
-AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[%define lr.default_rules "accepting"]],
+AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[%define lr.default-reductions "accepting"]],
                          [[accepting]], [[]],
-                         [[%define lr.default_rules "accepting"]],
+                         [[%define lr.default-reductions "accepting"]],
                          [$1], [$2], [[]], [$3])
 ])
 
-AT_TEST_LR_DEFAULT_RULES([[
+AT_TEST_LR_DEFAULT_REDUCTIONS([[
 /* The start state is consistent and has a shift on 'a' and no reductions.
    After pushing the b below, enter an inconsistent state that has a shift and
    one reduction with one lookahead.  */
@@ -1484,7 +1484,7 @@ a: 'a' ;
 
 /* After the previous reduction, enter an inconsistent state that has no shift
    and multiple reductions.  The first reduction has more lookaheads than the
-   second, so the first should always be preferred as the default rule if
+   second, so the first should always be preferred as the default reduction if
    enabled.  The second reduction has one lookahead.  */
 b: ;
 c: ;