/* System-dependent definitions for Bison.
- Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 Free
- Software Foundation, Inc.
+ Copyright (C) 2000-2007, 2009-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
| GCC extensions. |
`-----------------*/
-/* Use this to suppress gcc's `...may be used before initialized'
- warnings. */
-#ifdef lint
-# define IF_LINT(Code) Code
-#else
-# define IF_LINT(Code) /* empty */
-#endif
+/* Use PACIFY_CC to indicate that Code is unimportant to the logic of Bison
+ but that it is necessary for suppressing compiler warnings. For example,
+ Code might be a variable initializer that's always overwritten before the
+ variable is used.
+
+ PACIFY_CC is intended to be useful only as a comment as it does not alter
+ Code. It is tempting to redefine PACIFY_CC so that it will suppress Code
+ when configuring without --enable-gcc-warnings. However, that would mean
+ that, for maintainers, Bison would compile with potentially less warnings
+ and safer logic than it would for users. Due to the overhead of M4,
+ suppressing Code is unlikely to offer any significant improvement in
+ Bison's performance anyway. */
+#define PACIFY_CC(Code) Code
#ifndef __attribute__
/* This feature is available in gcc versions 2.5 and later. */
| Assertions. |
`-------------*/
-/* <assert.h>'s assertions are too heavyweight, and can be disabled
- too easily, so use aver rather than assert. */
-static inline void
-aver (bool assertion)
-{
- if (! assertion)
- abort ();
-}
+/* In the past, Bison defined aver to simply invoke abort in the case of
+ a failed assertion. The rationale was that <assert.h>'s assertions
+ were too heavyweight and could be disabled too easily. See
+ discussions at
+ <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2006-01/msg00080.html>
+ <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2006-09/msg00111.html>.
+
+ However, normal assert output can be helpful during development and
+ in bug reports from users. Moreover, it's not clear now that
+ <assert.h>'s assertions are significantly heavyweight. Finally, if
+ users want to experiment with disabling assertions, it's debatable
+ whether it's our responsibility to stop them. See discussion
+ starting at
+ <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2009-09/msg00013.html>.
+
+ For now, we use assert but we call it aver throughout Bison in case
+ we later wish to try another scheme.
+*/
+#include <assert.h>
+#define aver assert
/*-----------.