};
+/*----------------------------------------------------------------.
+| Explain how an SR conflict between TOKEN and RULE was resolved: |
+| RESOLUTION. |
+`----------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
static inline void
-log_resolution (int lookahead, int token,
+log_resolution (rule_t *rule, int token,
enum conflict_resolution_e resolution)
{
if (report_flag & report_solved_conflicts)
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
_("\
Conflict between rule %d and token %s resolved as shift"),
- LArule[lookahead]->number,
+ rule->number,
symbols[token]->tag);
break;
case reduce_resolution:
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
_("\
Conflict between rule %d and token %s resolved as reduce"),
- LArule[lookahead]->number,
+ rule->number,
symbols[token]->tag);
break;
case nonassoc_resolution:
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
_("\
Conflict between rule %d and token %s resolved as an error"),
- LArule[lookahead]->number,
+ rule->number,
symbols[token]->tag);
break;
}
case shift_resolution:
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
" (%s < %s)",
- LArule[lookahead]->prec->tag,
+ rule->prec->tag,
symbols[token]->tag);
break;
obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
" (%s < %s)",
symbols[token]->tag,
- LArule[lookahead]->prec->tag);
+ rule->prec->tag);
break;
case left_resolution:
static void
flush_shift (state_t *state, int token)
{
- shifts *shiftp = state->shifts;
+ shifts_t *shiftp = state->shifts;
int i;
bitset_reset (lookaheadset, token);
`-------------------------------------------------------------------*/
static void
-flush_reduce (int lookahead, int token)
+flush_reduce (bitset lookaheads, int token)
{
- bitset_reset (LA[lookahead], token);
+ bitset_reset (lookaheads, token);
}
| precedence declarations. It has already been checked that the |
| rule has a precedence. A conflict is resolved by modifying the |
| shift or reduce tables so that there is no longer a conflict. |
+| |
+| LOOKAHEAD is the number of the lookahead bitset to consider. |
`------------------------------------------------------------------*/
static void
resolve_sr_conflict (state_t *state, int lookahead)
{
int i;
- /* find the rule to reduce by to get precedence of reduction */
- int redprec = LArule[lookahead]->prec->prec;
- errs *errp = errs_new (ntokens + 1);
+ /* Find the rule to reduce by to get precedence of reduction. */
+ rule_t *redrule = state->lookaheads_rule[lookahead];
+ int redprec = redrule->prec->prec;
+ bitset lookaheads = state->lookaheads[lookahead];
+ errs_t *errp = errs_new (ntokens + 1);
errp->nerrs = 0;
for (i = 0; i < ntokens; i++)
- if (bitset_test (LA[lookahead], i)
+ if (bitset_test (lookaheads, i)
&& bitset_test (lookaheadset, i)
&& symbols[i]->prec)
{
The precedence of shifting is that of token i. */
if (symbols[i]->prec < redprec)
{
- log_resolution (lookahead, i, reduce_resolution);
+ log_resolution (redrule, i, reduce_resolution);
flush_shift (state, i);
}
else if (symbols[i]->prec > redprec)
{
- log_resolution (lookahead, i, shift_resolution);
- flush_reduce (lookahead, i);
+ log_resolution (redrule, i, shift_resolution);
+ flush_reduce (lookaheads, i);
}
else
/* Matching precedence levels.
switch (symbols[i]->assoc)
{
case right_assoc:
- log_resolution (lookahead, i, right_resolution);
- flush_reduce (lookahead, i);
+ log_resolution (redrule, i, right_resolution);
+ flush_reduce (lookaheads, i);
break;
case left_assoc:
- log_resolution (lookahead, i, left_resolution);
+ log_resolution (redrule, i, left_resolution);
flush_shift (state, i);
break;
case non_assoc:
- log_resolution (lookahead, i, nonassoc_resolution);
+ log_resolution (redrule, i, nonassoc_resolution);
flush_shift (state, i);
- flush_reduce (lookahead, i);
+ flush_reduce (lookaheads, i);
/* Record an explicit error for this token. */
errp->errs[errp->nerrs++] = i;
break;
set_conflicts (state_t *state)
{
int i;
- shifts *shiftp;
+ shifts_t *shiftp;
if (state->consistent)
return;
/* Loop over all rules which require lookahead in this state. First
check for shift-reduce conflict, and try to resolve using
- precedence */
+ precedence. */
for (i = 0; i < state->nlookaheads; ++i)
- if (LArule[state->lookaheadsp + i]->prec
- && LArule[state->lookaheadsp + i]->prec->prec
- && !bitset_disjoint_p (LA[state->lookaheadsp + i], lookaheadset))
+ if (state->lookaheads_rule[i]->prec
+ && state->lookaheads_rule[i]->prec->prec
+ && !bitset_disjoint_p (state->lookaheads[i], lookaheadset))
{
- resolve_sr_conflict (state, state->lookaheadsp + i);
+ resolve_sr_conflict (state, i);
break;
}
for conflicts not resolved above. */
for (i = 0; i < state->nlookaheads; ++i)
{
- if (!bitset_disjoint_p (LA[state->lookaheadsp + i], lookaheadset))
+ if (!bitset_disjoint_p (state->lookaheads[i], lookaheadset))
conflicts[state->number] = 1;
- bitset_or (lookaheadset, lookaheadset, LA[state->lookaheadsp + i]);
+ bitset_or (lookaheadset, lookaheadset, state->lookaheads[i]);
}
}
void
conflicts_solve (void)
{
- size_t i;
+ state_number_t i;
conflicts = XCALLOC (char, nstates);
shiftset = bitset_create (ntokens, BITSET_FIXED);
{
int i;
int src_count = 0;
- shifts *shiftp = state->shifts;
+ shifts_t *shiftp = state->shifts;
if (!shiftp)
return 0;
bitset_set (shiftset, SHIFT_SYMBOL (shiftp, i));
for (i = 0; i < state->nlookaheads; ++i)
- bitset_or (lookaheadset, lookaheadset, LA[state->lookaheadsp + i]);
+ bitset_or (lookaheadset, lookaheadset, state->lookaheads[i]);
bitset_and (lookaheadset, lookaheadset, shiftset);
}
-/*----------------------------------------------.
-| Count the number of reduce/reduce conflicts. |
-`----------------------------------------------*/
+/*----------------------------------------------------------------.
+| Count the number of reduce/reduce conflicts. If ONE_PER_TOKEN, |
+| count one conflict for each token that has any reduce/reduce |
+| conflicts. Otherwise, count one conflict for each pair of |
+| conflicting reductions. |
++`----------------------------------------------------------------*/
static int
-count_rr_conflicts (state_t *state)
+count_rr_conflicts (state_t *state, int one_per_token)
{
int i;
int rrc_count = 0;
int count = 0;
int j;
for (j = 0; j < state->nlookaheads; ++j)
- if (bitset_test (LA[state->lookaheadsp + j], i))
+ if (bitset_test (state->lookaheads[j], i))
count++;
if (count >= 2)
- rrc_count++;
+ rrc_count += one_per_token ? 1 : count-1;
}
return rrc_count;
conflicts_output (FILE *out)
{
bool printed_sth = FALSE;
- size_t i;
+ state_number_t i;
for (i = 0; i < nstates; i++)
if (conflicts[i])
{
fprintf (out, _("State %d contains "), i);
fputs (conflict_report (count_sr_conflicts (states[i]),
- count_rr_conflicts (states[i])), out);
+ count_rr_conflicts (states[i], TRUE)), out);
printed_sth = TRUE;
}
if (printed_sth)
fputs ("\n\n", out);
}
+/*--------------------------------------------------------.
+| Total the number of S/R and R/R conflicts. Unlike the |
+| code in conflicts_output, however, count EACH pair of |
+| reductions for the same state and lookahead as one |
+| conflict. |
+`--------------------------------------------------------*/
+
+int
+conflicts_total_count (void)
+{
+ state_number_t i;
+ int count;
+
+ /* Conflicts by state. */
+ count = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < nstates; i++)
+ if (conflicts[i])
+ {
+ count += count_sr_conflicts (states[i]);
+ count += count_rr_conflicts (states[i], FALSE);
+ }
+ return count;
+}
+
/*------------------------------------------.
| Reporting the total number of conflicts. |
void
conflicts_print (void)
{
- size_t i;
-
/* Is the number of SR conflicts OK? Either EXPECTED_CONFLICTS is
not set, and then we want 0 SR, or else it is specified, in which
case we want equality. */
int rrc_total = 0;
/* Conflicts by state. */
- for (i = 0; i < nstates; i++)
- if (conflicts[i])
- {
- src_total += count_sr_conflicts (states[i]);
- rrc_total += count_rr_conflicts (states[i]);
- }
+ {
+ state_number_t i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nstates; i++)
+ if (conflicts[i])
+ {
+ src_total += count_sr_conflicts (states[i]);
+ rrc_total += count_rr_conflicts (states[i], TRUE);
+ }
+ }
src_ok = src_total == (expected_conflicts == -1 ? 0 : expected_conflicts);
projects / bison.git / blobdiff