- if (verbose_flag)
- obstack_fgrow4 (&output_obstack,
- _("\
-Conflict in state %d between rule %d and token %s resolved as %s.\n"),
- state->number, LAruleno[LAno], symbols[token]->tag,
- resolution);
+ if (report_flag & report_solved_conflicts)
+ {
+ /* The description of the resolution. */
+ switch (resolution)
+ {
+ case shift_resolution:
+ case left_resolution:
+ obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
+ _("\
+ Conflict between rule %d and token %s resolved as shift"),
+ LArule[lookahead]->number,
+ symbols[token]->tag);
+ break;
+ case reduce_resolution:
+ case right_resolution:
+ obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
+ _("\
+ Conflict between rule %d and token %s resolved as reduce"),
+ LArule[lookahead]->number,
+ symbols[token]->tag);
+ break;
+ case nonassoc_resolution:
+ obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
+ _("\
+ Conflict between rule %d and token %s resolved as an error"),
+ LArule[lookahead]->number,
+ symbols[token]->tag);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* The reason. */
+ switch (resolution)
+ {
+ case shift_resolution:
+ obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
+ " (%s < %s)",
+ LArule[lookahead]->prec->tag,
+ symbols[token]->tag);
+ break;
+
+ case reduce_resolution:
+ obstack_fgrow2 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
+ " (%s < %s)",
+ symbols[token]->tag,
+ LArule[lookahead]->prec->tag);
+ break;
+
+ case left_resolution:
+ obstack_fgrow1 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
+ " (%%left %s)",
+ symbols[token]->tag);
+ break;
+
+ case right_resolution:
+ obstack_fgrow1 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
+ " (%%right %s)",
+ symbols[token]->tag);
+ break;
+ case nonassoc_resolution:
+ obstack_fgrow1 (&solved_conflicts_obstack,
+ " (%%nonassoc %s)",
+ symbols[token]->tag);
+ break;
+ }
+ obstack_sgrow (&solved_conflicts_obstack, ".\n");
+ }