-/*--------------------.
-| Build STATE_TABLE. |
-`--------------------*/
-
-static void
-set_state_table (void)
-{
- /* NSTATES + 1 because lookahead for the pseudo state number NSTATES
- might be used (see conflicts.c). It is too opaque for me to
- provide a probably less hacky implementation. --akim */
- state_table = XCALLOC (state_t, nstates + 1);
-
- {
- core *sp;
- for (sp = first_state; sp; sp = sp->next)
- {
- state_table[sp->number].state = sp;
- state_table[sp->number].accessing_symbol = sp->accessing_symbol;
- }
- }
-
- {
- shifts *sp;
- for (sp = first_shift; sp; sp = sp->next)
- state_table[sp->number].shift_table = sp;
- }
-
- {
- reductions *rp;
- for (rp = first_reduction; rp; rp = rp->next)
- state_table[rp->number].reduction_table = rp;
- }
-
- /* Pessimization, but simplification of the code: make sense all the
- states have a shift_table, even if reduced to 0 shifts. */
- {
- int i;
- for (i = 0; i < nstates; i++)
- if (!state_table[i].shift_table)
- state_table[i].shift_table = shifts_new (0);
- }
-
- /* Initializing the lookaheads members. Please note that it must be
- performed after having set some of the other members which are
- used below. Change with extreme caution. */
- {
- int i;
- int count = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < nstates; i++)
- {
- int k;
- reductions *rp = state_table[i].reduction_table;
- shifts *sp = state_table[i].shift_table;
-
- state_table[i].lookaheads = count;
-
- if (rp
- && (rp->nreds > 1 || (sp->nshifts && SHIFT_IS_SHIFT (sp, 0))))
- count += rp->nreds;
- else
- state_table[i].consistent = 1;
-
- for (k = 0; k < sp->nshifts; k++)
- if (SHIFT_IS_ERROR (sp, k))
- {
- state_table[i].consistent = 0;
- break;
- }
- }
- state_table[nstates].lookaheads = count;
- }
-}
-
-