+ for (i = 0; i < nLA; i++)
+ LIST_FREE (goto_list, lookback[i]);
+
+ free (lookback);
+ bitsetv_free (F);
+}
+
+
+/*----------------------------------------------------.
+| Count the number of lookahead tokens required for S |
+| (N_LOOKAHEAD_TOKENS member). |
+`----------------------------------------------------*/
+
+static int
+state_lookahead_tokens_count (state *s)
+{
+ int n_lookahead_tokens = 0;
+ reductions *rp = s->reductions;
+ transitions *sp = s->transitions;
+
+ /* We need a lookahead either to distinguish different
+ reductions (i.e., there are two or more), or to distinguish a
+ reduction from a shift. Otherwise, it is straightforward,
+ and the state is `consistent'. There is no need to check that
+ transition 0 hasn't been disabled before checking if it is a
+ shift since transitions are only disabled during conflict
+ resolution, and that hasn't happened yet. */
+ aver (sp->num == 0 || !TRANSITION_IS_DISABLED (sp, 0));
+ if (rp->num > 1
+ || (rp->num == 1 && sp->num && TRANSITION_IS_SHIFT (sp, 0)))
+ n_lookahead_tokens += rp->num;
+ else
+ s->consistent = 1;
+
+ return n_lookahead_tokens;
+}
+
+
+/*----------------------------------------------------.
+| Compute LA, NLA, and the lookahead_tokens members. |
+`----------------------------------------------------*/
+
+static void
+initialize_LA (void)
+{
+ state_number i;
+ bitsetv pLA;
+
+ /* Compute the total number of reductions requiring a lookahead. */
+ nLA = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < nstates; i++)
+ nLA += state_lookahead_tokens_count (states[i]);
+ /* Avoid having to special case 0. */
+ if (!nLA)
+ nLA = 1;
+
+ pLA = LA = bitsetv_create (nLA, ntokens, BITSET_FIXED);
+ lookback = xcalloc (nLA, sizeof *lookback);
+
+ /* Initialize the members LOOKAHEAD_TOKENS for each state whose reductions
+ require lookahead tokens. */
+ for (i = 0; i < nstates; i++)