AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
[[State 4 contains 1 shift/reduce conflict.
+
Grammar
Number, Line, Rule
1 3 exp -> exp OP exp
2 3 exp -> NUM
+
Terminals, with rules where they appear
$ (-1)
NUM (257) 2
OP (258) 1
+
Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
exp (5)
exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1)
- $ go to state 5
+ $ shift, and go to state 5
OP shift, and go to state 3
state 5
- $ go to state 6
+ $ shift, and go to state 6
state 6
$default accept
+
+
]])
AT_CLEANUP
AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
[[Conflict in state 4 between rule 1 and token OP resolved as shift.
+
Grammar
Number, Line, Rule
1 4 exp -> exp OP exp
2 4 exp -> NUM
+
Terminals, with rules where they appear
$ (-1)
NUM (257) 2
OP (258) 1
+
Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
exp (5)
exp -> exp . OP exp (rule 1)
- $ go to state 5
+ $ shift, and go to state 5
OP shift, and go to state 3
state 5
- $ go to state 6
+ $ shift, and go to state 6
+
+
+
+state 6
+
+ $default accept
+
+
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+
+
+## ------------------- ##
+## Rule Line Numbers. ##
+## ------------------- ##
+
+AT_SETUP([Rule Line Numbers])
+
+AT_DATA([input.y],
+[[%%
+expr:
+'a'
+
+{
+
+}
+
+'b'
+
+{
+
+}
+
+|
+
+
+{
+
+
+}
+
+'c'
+
+{
+
+}
+]])
+
+AT_CHECK([bison input.y -o input.c -v], 0, [], [])
+
+# Check the contents of the report.
+AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
+[[Grammar
+
+ Number, Line, Rule
+ 1 2 @1 -> /* empty */
+ 2 2 expr -> 'a' @1 'b'
+ 3 15 @2 -> /* empty */
+ 4 15 expr -> @2 'c'
+
+
+Terminals, with rules where they appear
+
+$ (-1)
+'a' (97) 2
+'b' (98) 2
+'c' (99) 4
+error (256)
+
+
+Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
+
+expr (6)
+ on left: 2 4
+@1 (7)
+ on left: 1, on right: 2
+@2 (8)
+ on left: 3, on right: 4
+
+
+state 0
+
+ 'a' shift, and go to state 1
+
+ $default reduce using rule 3 (@2)
+
+ expr go to state 6
+ @2 go to state 2
+
+
+
+state 1
+
+ expr -> 'a' . @1 'b' (rule 2)
+
+ $default reduce using rule 1 (@1)
+
+ @1 go to state 3
+
+
+
+state 2
+
+ expr -> @2 . 'c' (rule 4)
+
+ 'c' shift, and go to state 4
+
+
+
+state 3
+
+ expr -> 'a' @1 . 'b' (rule 2)
+
+ 'b' shift, and go to state 5
+
+
+
+state 4
+
+ expr -> @2 'c' . (rule 4)
+
+ $default reduce using rule 4 (expr)
+
+
+
+state 5
+
+ expr -> 'a' @1 'b' . (rule 2)
+
+ $default reduce using rule 2 (expr)
state 6
+ $ shift, and go to state 7
+
+
+
+state 7
+
$default accept
+
+
]])
AT_CLEANUP
]])
AT_CHECK([bison input.y], [1], [],
-[input.y:2: invalid input: `?'
+[[input.y:2: invalid input: `?'
input.y:3: fatal error: no rules in the input grammar
-])
+]])
AT_CLEANUP
]])
AT_CHECK([bison input.y], [1], [],
-[input.y:2: invalid input: `}'
-])
+[[input.y:2: invalid input: `}'
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP
+
+
+
+## -------------------- ##
+## Invalid %directive. ##
+## -------------------- ##
+
+
+AT_SETUP([Invalid %directive])
+
+AT_DATA([input.y],
+[[%invalid
+]])
+
+AT_CHECK([bison input.y], [1], [],
+[[input.y:1: unrecognized: %invalid
+input.y:1: Skipping to next %
+input.y:2: fatal error: no input grammar
+]])
AT_CLEANUP
AT_TEST_CPP_GUARD_H([input/input])
AT_TEST_CPP_GUARD_H([9foo])
+
+
+## ---------------- ##
+## Broken Closure. ##
+## ---------------- ##
+
+# TC was once broken during a massive `simplification' of the code.
+# It resulted in bison dumping core on the following grammar (the
+# computation of FIRSTS uses TC). It managed to produce a pretty
+# exotic closure:
+#
+# TC: Input
+#
+# 01234567
+# +--------+
+# 0| 1 |
+# 1| 1 |
+# 2| 1 |
+# 3| 1 |
+# 4| 1 |
+# 5| 1 |
+# 6| 1|
+# 7| |
+# +--------+
+#
+# TC: Output
+#
+# 01234567
+# +--------+
+# 0| 1 |
+# 1| 111 |
+# 2| 111 |
+# 3| 1111 |
+# 4| 111 1 |
+# 5| 111 1 |
+# 6| 111 1|
+# 7| 111 |
+# +--------+
+#
+# instead of that below.
+
+AT_SETUP([Broken Closure])
+
+AT_DATA([input.y],
+[[%%
+a: b
+b: c
+c: d
+d: e
+e: f
+f: g
+g: h
+h: 'h'
+]])
+
+AT_CHECK([bison --trace input.y 2>&1 |
+ sed -n '/^TC: Output BEGIN/,/^TC: Output END/p'],
+ [0],
+[[TC: Output BEGIN
+ @&t@
+ 01234567
+ +--------+
+ 0| 1111111|
+ 1| 111111|
+ 2| 11111|
+ 3| 1111|
+ 4| 111|
+ 5| 11|
+ 6| 1|
+ 7| |
+ +--------+
+TC: Output END
+]])
+
+AT_CLEANUP