warn_at (r->location, _("unset value: $$"));
}
}
+
+ /* See comments in grammar_current_rule_prec_set for how POSIX
+ mandates this complaint. It's only for identifiers, so skip
+ it for char literals and strings, which are always tokens. */
+ if (r->ruleprec
+ && r->ruleprec->tag[0] != '\'' && r->ruleprec->tag[0] != '"'
+ && !r->ruleprec->declared && !r->ruleprec->prec)
+ warn_at (r->location, _("token for %%prec is not defined: %s"),
+ r->ruleprec->tag);
}
void
grammar_current_rule_prec_set (symbol *precsym, location loc)
{
+ /* POSIX says that any identifier is a nonterminal if it does not
+ appear on the LHS of a grammar rule and is not defined by %token
+ or by one of the directives that assigns precedence to a token. We
+ ignore this here because the only kind of identifier that POSIX
+ allows to follow a %prec is a token and because assuming it's a
+ token now can produce more logical error messages. Nevertheless,
+ grammar_rule_check does obey what we believe is the real intent of
+ POSIX here: that an error be reported for any identifier that
+ appears after %prec but that is not defined separately as a
+ token. */
symbol_class_set (precsym, token_sym, loc, false);
if (current_rule->ruleprec)
complain_at (loc, _("only one %s allowed per rule"), "%prec");