+2006-08-23 Joel E. Denny <jdenny@ces.clemson.edu>
+
+ Whether the default %destructor/%printer applies to a particular symbol
+ isn't a question of whether the user *declares* that symbol (in %token,
+ for example). It's a question of whether the user by any means
+ *defines* the symbol at all (by simply using a char token, for
+ example). $end is defined by Bison whereas any other token with token
+ number 0 is defined by the user. The error token is always defined by
+ Bison regardless of whether the user declares it with %token, but we
+ may one day let the user define error as a nonterminal instead.
+ * NEWS (2.3+): Say "user-defined" instead of "user-declared".
+ * doc/bison.texinfo (Freeing Discarded Symbols): Likewise, and document
+ the meaning of "user-defined".
+ * tests/actions.at (Default %printer and %destructor for user-declared
+ end token): Rename to...
+ (Default %printer and %destructor for user-defined end token): ...
+ this.
+
+ * src/symtab.c (symbol_destructor_get, symbol_printer_get): In the
+ computation of whether to apply the default, don't maintain a list of
+ every Bison-defined symbol. Instead, just check for a first character
+ of '$', which a user symbol cannot have, and check for the error token.
+
2006-08-21 Joel E. Denny <jdenny@ces.clemson.edu>
Don't apply the default %destructor or %printer to the error token,