+** Types of values for %define variables
+
+ Bison used to make no difference between '%define foo bar' and '%define
+ foo "bar"'. The former is now called a 'keyword value', and the latter a
+ 'string value'. A third kind was added: 'code values', such as '%define
+ foo {bar}'.
+
+ Keyword variables are used for fixed value sets, e.g.,
+
+ %define lr.type lalr
+
+ Code variables are used for value in the target language, e.g.,
+
+ %define api.value.type {struct semantic_type}
+
+ String variables are used remaining cases, e.g. file names.
+
+** Variable api.token.prefix
+
+ The variable api.token.prefix changes the way tokens are identified in
+ the generated files. This is especially useful to avoid collisions
+ with identifiers in the target language. For instance
+
+ %token FILE for ERROR
+ %define api.token.prefix {TOK_}
+ %%
+ start: FILE for ERROR;
+
+ will generate the definition of the symbols TOK_FILE, TOK_for, and
+ TOK_ERROR in the generated sources. In particular, the scanner must
+ use these prefixed token names, although the grammar itself still
+ uses the short names (as in the sample rule given above).
+
+** Variable api.value.type
+
+ This new %define variable supersedes the #define macro YYSTYPE. The use
+ of YYSTYPE is discouraged. In particular, #defining YYSTYPE *and* either
+ using %union or %defining api.value.type results in undefined behavior.
+
+ Either define api.value.type, or use "%union":
+
+ %union
+ {
+ int ival;
+ char *sval;
+ }
+ %token <ival> INT "integer"
+ %token <sval> STRING "string"
+ %printer { fprintf (yyo, "%d", $$); } <ival>
+ %destructor { free ($$); } <sval>
+
+ /* In yylex(). */
+ yylval.ival = 42; return INT;
+ yylval.sval = "42"; return STRING;
+
+ The %define variable api.value.type supports both keyword and code values.
+
+ The keyword value 'union' means that the user provides genuine types, not
+ union member names such as "ival" and "sval" above (WARNING: will fail if
+ -y/--yacc/%yacc is enabled).
+
+ %define api.value.type union
+ %token <int> INT "integer"
+ %token <char *> STRING "string"
+ %printer { fprintf (yyo, "%d", $$); } <int>
+ %destructor { free ($$); } <char *>
+
+ /* In yylex(). */
+ yylval.INT = 42; return INT;
+ yylval.STRING = "42"; return STRING;
+
+ The keyword value variant is somewhat equivalent, but for C++ special
+ provision is made to allow classes to be used (more about this below).
+
+ %define api.value.type variant
+ %token <int> INT "integer"
+ %token <std::string> STRING "string"
+
+ Code values (in braces) denote user defined types. This is where YYSTYPE
+ used to be used.
+
+ %code requires
+ {
+ struct my_value
+ {
+ enum
+ {
+ is_int, is_string
+ } kind;
+ union
+ {
+ int ival;
+ char *sval;
+ } u;
+ };
+ }
+ %define api.value.type {struct my_value}
+ %token <u.ival> INT "integer"
+ %token <u.sval> STRING "string"
+ %printer { fprintf (yyo, "%d", $$); } <u.ival>
+ %destructor { free ($$); } <u.sval>
+
+ /* In yylex(). */
+ yylval.u.ival = 42; return INT;
+ yylval.u.sval = "42"; return STRING;
+
+** Variable parse.error
+
+ This variable controls the verbosity of error messages. The use of the
+ %error-verbose directive is deprecated in favor of "%define parse.error
+ verbose".
+
+** Renamed %define variables
+
+ The following variables have been renamed for consistency. Backward
+ compatibility is ensured, but upgrading is recommended.
+
+ lr.default-reductions -> lr.default-reduction
+ lr.keep-unreachable-states -> lr.keep-unreachable-state
+ namespace -> api.namespace
+ stype -> api.value.type
+
+** Semantic predicates
+
+ Contributed by Paul Hilfinger.
+
+ The new, experimental, semantic-predicate feature allows actions of the
+ form "%?{ BOOLEAN-EXPRESSION }", which cause syntax errors (as for
+ YYERROR) if the expression evaluates to 0, and are evaluated immediately
+ in GLR parsers, rather than being deferred. The result is that they allow
+ the programmer to prune possible parses based on the values of run-time
+ expressions.
+
+** The directive %expect-rr is now an error in non GLR mode
+
+ It used to be an error only if used in non GLR mode, _and_ if there are
+ reduce/reduce conflicts.
+
+** Tokens are numbered in their order of appearance
+
+ Contributed by Valentin Tolmer.
+
+ With '%token A B', A had a number less than the one of B. However,
+ precedence declarations used to generate a reversed order. This is now
+ fixed, and introducing tokens with any of %token, %left, %right,
+ %precedence, or %nonassoc yields the same result.
+
+ When mixing declarations of tokens with a litteral character (e.g., 'a')
+ or with an identifier (e.g., B) in a precedence declaration, Bison
+ numbered the litteral characters first. For example
+
+ %right A B 'c' 'd'
+
+ would lead to the tokens declared in this order: 'c' 'd' A B. Again, the
+ input order is now preserved.
+
+ These changes were made so that one can remove useless precedence and
+ associativity declarations (i.e., map %nonassoc, %left or %right to
+ %precedence, or to %token) and get exactly the same output.
+
+** Useless precedence and associativity
+
+ Contributed by Valentin Tolmer.
+
+ When developing and maintaining a grammar, useless associativity and
+ precedence directives are common. They can be a nuisance: new ambiguities
+ arising are sometimes masked because their conflicts are resolved due to
+ the extra precedence or associativity information. Furthermore, it can
+ hinder the comprehension of a new grammar: one will wonder about the role
+ of a precedence, where in fact it is useless. The following changes aim
+ at detecting and reporting these extra directives.
+
+*** Precedence warning category
+
+ A new category of warning, -Wprecedence, was introduced. It flags the
+ useless precedence and associativity directives.
+
+*** Useless associativity
+
+ Bison now warns about symbols with a declared associativity that is never
+ used to resolve conflicts. In that case, using %precedence is sufficient;
+ the parsing tables will remain unchanged. Solving these warnings may raise
+ useless precedence warnings, as the symbols no longer have associativity.
+ For example:
+
+ %left '+'
+ %left '*'
+ %%
+ exp:
+ "number"
+ | exp '+' "number"
+ | exp '*' exp
+ ;
+
+ will produce a
+
+ warning: useless associativity for '+', use %precedence [-Wprecedence]
+ %left '+'
+ ^^^
+
+*** Useless precedence
+
+ Bison now warns about symbols with a declared precedence and no declared
+ associativity (i.e., declared with %precedence), and whose precedence is
+ never used. In that case, the symbol can be safely declared with %token
+ instead, without modifying the parsing tables. For example:
+
+ %precedence '='
+ %%
+ exp: "var" '=' "number";
+
+ will produce a
+
+ warning: useless precedence for '=' [-Wprecedence]
+ %precedence '='
+ ^^^
+
+*** Useless precedence and associativity
+
+ In case of both useless precedence and associativity, the issue is flagged
+ as follows:
+
+ %nonassoc '='
+ %%
+ exp: "var" '=' "number";
+
+ The warning is:
+
+ warning: useless precedence and associativity for '=' [-Wprecedence]
+ %nonassoc '='
+ ^^^
+
+** Empty rules
+
+ With help from Joel E. Denny and Gabriel Rassoul.
+
+ Empty rules (i.e., with an empty right-hand side) can now be explicitly
+ marked by the new %empty directive. Using %empty on a non-empty rule is
+ an error. The new -Wempty-rule warning reports empty rules without
+ %empty. On the following grammar:
+
+ %%
+ s: a b c;
+ a: ;
+ b: %empty;
+ c: 'a' %empty;
+
+ bison reports:
+
+ 3.4-5: warning: empty rule without %empty [-Wempty-rule]
+ a: {}
+ ^^
+ 5.8-13: error: %empty on non-empty rule
+ c: 'a' %empty {};
+ ^^^^^^
+
projects / bison.git / blobdiff