@cindex reentrant parser
@cindex pure parser
@findex %define api.pure
+@findex %define api.pure full
A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
reentrant. It looks like this:
@example
-%define api.pure
+%define api.pure full
@end example
The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
@example
-%define api.pure
+%define api.pure full
%define api.push-pull push
@end example
yypstate_delete (ps);
@end example
-Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
-the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
+Adding the @code{%define api.pure full} declaration does exactly the same thing
+to the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
@code{%define api.push-pull push}.
@node Decl Summary
@item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
-@item Accepted Values: Boolean
+@item Accepted Values: @code{true}, @code{false}, @code{full}
+
+The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying @code{true}, as is
+the case for Boolean values.
+
+When @code{%define api.pure full} is used, the parser is made reentrant. This
+changes the signature for yylex (@pxref{Pure Calling}), and also that of
+yyerror when the tracking of locations has been activated, as shown below.
+
+The @code{true} value is very similar to the @code{full} value, the only
+difference is in the signature of @code{yyerror} on Yacc parsers without
+@code{%parse-param}, for historical reasons.
+
+I.e., if @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
+@code{yyerror} are:
+
+@example
+void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
+void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
+@end example
+
+But if @samp{%locations %define api.pure %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is
+used, then both parsers have the same signature:
+
+@example
+void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
+@end example
+
+(@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
+Reporting Function @code{yyerror}})
@item Default Value: @code{false}
+
+@item History: the @code{full} value was introduced in Bison 2.7
@end itemize
@c ================================================== api.push-pull
exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
@end example
+@noindent
+Using the following:
+@example
+%parse-param @{int *randomness@}
+@end example
+
+Results in these signatures:
+@example
+void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
+int yyparse (int *randomness);
+@end example
+
+@noindent
+Or, if both @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure})
+and @code{%locations} are used:
+
+@example
+void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
+int yyparse (int *randomness);
+@end example
+
@node Push Parser Function
@section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
@findex yypush_parse
@node Pure Calling
@subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
-When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
+When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure full} to request a
pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
@end deffn
+@noindent
For instance:
@example
-%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
%lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
-%parse-param @{int *randomness@}
@end example
@noindent
-results in the following signatures:
-
-@example
-int yylex (int *nastiness);
-int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
-@end example
-
-If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
+results in the following signature:
@example
-int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
-int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
+int yylex (int *nastiness);
@end example
@noindent
-and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
+If @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure}) is added:
@example
-int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
-int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
+int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
@end example
@node Error Reporting
immediately return 1.
Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
-an access to the current location.
-This is indeed the case for the GLR
-parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
-@samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
-@code{yyerror} are:
-
-@example
-void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
-void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
-@end example
+an access to the current location. With @code{%define api.pure}, this is
+indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
+historical reasons, and this is the why @code{%define api.pure full} should be
+prefered over @code{%define api.pure}.
-If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
-
-@example
-void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
-void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
-@end example
-
-Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
-convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
-convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
-@code{%define api.pure} are pure.
-I.e.:
-
-@example
-/* Location tracking. */
-%locations
-/* Pure yylex. */
-%define api.pure
-%lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
-/* Pure yyparse. */
-%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
-%parse-param @{int *randomness@}
-@end example
-
-@noindent
-results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
+When @code{%locations %define api.pure full} is used, @code{yyerror} has the
+following signature:
@example
-int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
-int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
-void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
- int *nastiness, int *randomness,
- char const *msg);
+void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
@end example
@noindent
The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
-@code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
+@code{%define api.pure full} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
@deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
-and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
+and @code{%define api.pure full} directives does not do anything when used in
Java.
Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
@quotation
My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
-although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
+although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure full}.
@end quotation
These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
projects / bison.git / blobdiff